
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Biotechnology PharmaceuticalsTop 10 Best Genome Analysis Software of 2026
Top 10 genome analysis software rankings with accuracy and speed checks for teams comparing CLC Genomics Workbench, BaseSpace, and GenePattern.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
CLC Genomics Workbench is the best fit when lab teams need interactive, repeatable variant workflows in a desktop setup, whereas SOPHiA DDM suits clinical teams that want consistent variant review and evidence packaging at scale.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
CLC Genomics Workbench
Interactive pileup and alignment visualization tied directly into variant filtering and export steps.
Built for fits when lab teams need interactive variant workflows and repeatable saved pipelines..
BaseSpace Sequence Hub
Editor pickRun-to-result lineage across apps keeps sequencing outputs, execution steps, and published artifacts connected for review.
Built for fits when Illumina labs need run-to-result traceability plus automation for routine NGS pipelines..
SOPHiA DDM
Editor pickCurated evidence panels with interpretation-oriented variant exploration tied to configurable reviewer filters.
Built for fits when clinical teams need consistent variant review and evidence packaging at scale..
Related reading
Comparison Table
CLC Genomics Workbench
enterpriseDesktop software for NGS data analysis, variant calling, RNA-Seq, metagenomics, and microbial genomics.
Interactive pileup and alignment visualization tied directly into variant filtering and export steps.
CLC Genomics Workbench provides a GUI-driven pipeline for common genomics tasks that start from FASTQ and progress through BAM generation, variant calling, and annotated VCF outputs. The tool includes alignment visualization with coverage and pileup inspection, which helps confirm filtering decisions before exporting results. GFF3 track support and reference-anchored feature overlays simplify inspection when working with gene models and annotations.
A key tradeoff is that the workflow automation surface is centered on saved workflows rather than a native developer-first API for custom orchestration. Teams that run the same analysis repeatedly across cohorts benefit most when they can standardize parameters, reuse workflows, and review intermediate outputs interactively before final export.
- +Interactive read mapping and pileup review inside the analysis flow
- +Integrated assembly, QC, and variant calling with consistent export formats
- +GFF3 track overlays support feature-level inspection during analysis
- +Workflow reuse helps standardize parameters across recurring projects
- –Desktop workflow focus limits fine-grained developer automation compared to API-first tools
- –Advanced customization can require manual pipeline parameter tuning
- –Large-scale throughput depends on local hardware capacity and I O setup
Clinical research bioinformatics
Validate SNP filters on BAM
Fewer false positives
Microbial genomics labs
Assemble and evaluate contigs
Repeatable assembly outputs
Show 2 more scenarios
Translational genomics teams
Annotate variants with gene models
Faster biological interpretation
Use GFF3 track support to overlay features and refine interpretation of annotated variants.
Core facilities
Standardize cohort processing
Consistent cross-cohort results
Reuse saved analysis workflows to process multiple datasets with consistent parameters and outputs.
Best for: Fits when lab teams need interactive variant workflows and repeatable saved pipelines.
More related reading
BaseSpace Sequence Hub
enterpriseCloud software for sequencing run management, secondary analysis, app workflows, and genomic data sharing.
Run-to-result lineage across apps keeps sequencing outputs, execution steps, and published artifacts connected for review.
BaseSpace Sequence Hub organizes data at the level of sequencing runs and downstream sample artifacts, and it keeps a lineage between raw outputs, executed apps, and published results. App execution supports multi-step workflows like read processing and downstream analyses, with outputs organized for consistent review and re-use. Automation is centered on programmatic launch and status tracking, which helps teams standardize re-analysis without manual clicks.
A practical tradeoff appears when work depends on non-Illumina tools or niche preprocessing not covered by available apps, since customization typically requires an external pipeline and re-ingestion. BaseSpace fits best for labs that want a managed workflow for routine NGS pipelines, standardized result packaging, and controlled sharing across multiple analysts and review stages.
- +Run-linked lineage connects raw outputs to app results
- +App-based workflow reuse reduces manual pipeline stitching
- +Programmatic job launch and monitoring support automation
- +Project organization supports consistent sharing across teams
- –Customization for non-native steps often needs external pipelines
- –Governance depth is weaker than enterprise data governance suites
- –Workflow coverage can lag for specialized niche preprocessing
- –Cross-tool interoperability depends on available import and exports
Core sequencing facility staff
Publish standardized results per sequencing run
Faster handoff to analysis teams
Bioinformatics team leads
Automate re-analysis across batches
Lower manual reprocessing effort
Show 2 more scenarios
Clinical research coordinators
Collaborate on sample status and outputs
Fewer file-management errors
Non-technical reviewers navigate project artifacts and verify app outputs without copying files locally.
Method development scientists
Integrate custom steps outside apps
Still get centralized traceability
Scientists execute non-native preprocessing externally and re-import packaged outputs for browsing and review.
Best for: Fits when Illumina labs need run-to-result traceability plus automation for routine NGS pipelines.
SOPHiA DDM
vertical specialistCloud analytics platform for genomic testing, variant interpretation, and clinical decision support workflows.
Curated evidence panels with interpretation-oriented variant exploration tied to configurable reviewer filters.
SOPHiA DDM is built around the interpretation cycle rather than command-line analysis alone, with structured variant browsing, phenotype-aware prioritization views, and evidence panels for review. The environment expects typical alignment and variant outputs as inputs and then provides annotation layers and configurable filtering for consistent case triage. It also supports collaborative review across projects, which reduces rework when multiple clinicians and analysts assess the same findings.
A tradeoff is that SOPHiA DDM is less suited for building custom analysis pipelines because it centers on interpreting produced variant sets rather than swapping core analysis engines. It fits best when a lab needs repeatable review workflows for many cases and wants centralized configuration for filters, annotation display, and reviewer handoffs.
- +Variant-centric interpretation views with evidence panels for reviewer sign-off
- +Configurable filtering for consistent case triage across batches
- +Project collaboration supports shared review state and controlled access
- +Managed ingestion of standard sequencing outputs into analysis-ready results
- –Custom pipeline control is limited compared with workflow engines
- –Upfront configuration is needed for interpretation standards and reviewer practices
- –Specialized analysis beyond interpretation depends on upstream processing
- –Large cohorts can require workflow tuning for interactive responsiveness
Clinical genomics teams
Case review with evidence tracking
Faster sign-off on findings
Molecular diagnostics labs
Batch triage for incoming cases
Reduced triage variance
Show 2 more scenarios
Regulated study coordinators
Governed project collaboration
Lower risk of inconsistent review
Teams restrict access by roles within projects and maintain a consistent review workflow for study outputs.
Bioinformatics analysts
Interpretation handoff from pipelines
Cleaner analyst to clinic handoff
Analysts pass produced variant sets into SOPHiA DDM for standardized evidence visualization and filtering for reporting.
Best for: Fits when clinical teams need consistent variant review and evidence packaging at scale.
Geneious Prime
SMBDesktop bioinformatics software for sequence assembly, alignment, primer design, phylogenetics, and variant analysis.
Geneious Prime worksheets that tie together input data, parameters, and results into a persistent, shareable analysis history.
Geneious Prime combines a visual, end-to-end genome analysis workspace with centralized project management and reproducible workflows. It supports standard genomics data formats like FASTQ, BAM, VCF, and assembled contigs, and it connects common analysis steps such as mapping, variant interpretation, and phylogeny into a single UI-driven flow.
Geneious Prime is distinct for its worksheet-style analysis documents that persist parameters and outputs alongside imported datasets. It also offers extensibility through plugins and scripting hooks, which helps teams standardize recurring pipelines across projects.
- +Worksheet-driven analyses persist parameters and outputs per project
- +Integrated viewers for alignments, variants, and assemblies reduce file hopping
- +Broad format handling for BAM, VCF, FASTQ, and common annotation tracks
- +Plugin and script extensibility supports automation beyond built-in tools
- –Workflow automation at scale depends on external scripting or add-ons
- –Large cohorts can feel slower versus batch-focused workflow engines
- –Advanced governance like fine-grained RBAC and audit logs require extra discipline
- –Some specialized downstream analyses depend on separate tools or plugins
Best for: Fits when teams need interactive genome analysis workbooks with repeatable parameters and plugin-based extension.
DNAnexus
enterpriseCloud platform for genomic data analysis, workflow orchestration, collaboration, and regulated bioinformatics operations.
DNAnexus app and workflow system records input-output lineage per job while supporting API-driven run orchestration.
DNAnexus performs end-to-end genome analysis by running standardized pipelines on uploaded sequencing and variant data. DNAnexus emphasizes integration with third-party tools through a workflow system that stages files, manages execution, and records outputs for downstream steps.
Genome centers use it for variant-centric tasks like VCF annotation handling and BAM-derived analyses inside controlled compute jobs. Governance features like project-level permissions and audit visibility support multi-team use across research and clinical-bound workflows.
- +Strong workflow execution model with reusable apps and clear file staging
- +API-first automation for launching analyses and retrieving structured outputs
- +Project-level permissions support controlled sharing across teams
- +Audit-friendly activity history for traceability of job inputs and outputs
- –Workflow authoring requires familiarity with DNAnexus app packaging conventions
- –Some analysis depth depends on external apps rather than built-in algorithm coverage
- –Large cohort scaling can require careful data layout choices
- –Result discovery across many runs can feel cumbersome without disciplined naming
Best for: Fits when labs need governed automation around variant and BAM-centric workflows across multiple teams.
Terra
API-firstCloud-native platform for genomic data analysis, workflow execution, notebooks, and collaborative research workspaces.
Terra’s integration of collaborative workflow execution with a programmatic API for pipeline automation and run metadata access.
Terra is a genome analysis workspace built around reproducible workflows and team collaboration. It integrates execution on common compute backends, manages reference data and inputs, and tracks workflow runs as shared research artifacts.
Core capabilities focus on building pipelines with modular components, running them at scale, and connecting outputs to downstream analysis and reporting. Terra also supports programmatic automation through an API surface that connects pipeline configuration, execution, and data access.
- +Workflow-driven execution keeps runs reproducible across teams and labs
- +Shared workspaces improve audit trails for inputs, configs, and outputs
- +API enables automation of workflow submission and metadata retrieval
- +Extensibility supports custom tasks and environment configuration for pipelines
- –Complex workflow design can slow early adoption for small one-off analyses
- –Some pipeline authors require explicit container or dependency management discipline
- –Debugging failures is harder when logs span multiple pipeline stages
- –Data staging and references demand careful setup to avoid reruns
Best for: Fits when research teams need governed, reusable genome workflows with automation and shared run history.
Galaxy
research platformOpen web platform for reproducible bioinformatics workflows including genome assembly, variant calling, and RNA-Seq analysis.
History-based provenance with rerunnable parameters across shared datasets and workflows.
Galaxy is distinct for turning genome workflows into a web-based, shareable execution system with reusable histories and tools. It supports common genomics file flows with upload, format handling, and visualization steps that chain into analysis pipelines.
Galaxy also provides workflow and tool integration via a plugin and API-oriented approach that lets labs standardize repeated variant calling, assembly, and annotation runs. Strong auditability comes from capturing parameter choices inside histories that can be rerun and shared across teams.
- +Reusable workflows with parameter capture inside histories
- +Extensive tool ecosystem for genomics inputs and outputs
- +Web UI supports stepwise review using intermediate datasets
- +Workflow execution supports consistent reruns across datasets
- –Complex pipelines can require careful workflow design
- –High-throughput runs need infrastructure planning beyond the UI
- –Some advanced annotation workflows depend on external tool availability
- –Workflow sharing still needs governance to prevent drift
Best for: Fits when labs need reproducible genomics workflows with interactive review and rerunable histories.
Benchling
enterpriseR&D software that includes molecular biology sequence analysis, registry, notebook, and bioinformatics workflow support.
Benchling Workflows connect sequence-related records to automation steps with built-in provenance for each artifact.
Benchling is a genome analysis software suite built around lab data tracking, sequence-centric records, and controlled collaboration across projects.
Its core strength is end-to-end electronic recordkeeping that connects sample metadata, sequence files, and analysis outputs into a searchable workflow history.
Benchling also supports automation and extensibility via API-driven integrations that move data between internal systems and external analysis tools.
For genome teams, the distinct value comes from governance-friendly project structures and audit trails that stay attached to the artifacts generated during analysis.
- +Sequence-linked sample and analysis history keeps context attached to artifacts
- +API integration surface supports programmatic import, export, and sync
- +Project permissions and audit trails support controlled collaboration
- +Configurable workflows reduce manual steps across recurring analysis runs
- –Deeper variant calling and alignment tuning still requires external compute tools
- –Complex governance setups can add overhead for small research groups
- –Track-level import for specialized genome annotation formats may be uneven
- –High-throughput pipelines need careful design for metadata and file storage
Best for: Fits when genome teams need governed records that tie sequence inputs to downstream analysis outputs.
Golden Helix VarSeq
vertical specialistVariant analysis software for filtering, annotation, interpretation, and clinical genomics reporting.
Inheritance and phenotype-aware curation workflows that turn VCF annotation into reviewer-consistent, exportable variant reports.
Golden Helix VarSeq parses variant call inputs such as VCF and applies configurable variant-level filters, annotations, and inheritance-aware review workflows. It supports curated gene and phenotype evidence views for prioritizing candidate variants and exporting decision-ready variant reports.
VarSeq also automates multi-sample quality checks and consistency checks across studies so review steps repeat with fewer manual edits. The software is built for interactive curation with workflow configuration rather than building custom pipelines from scratch.
- +Rule-based variant filtering with inheritance-aware review logic
- +Curated gene and phenotype evidence panels for fast candidate triage
- +Repeatable study configurations that standardize reviewer decisions
- +Reporting outputs designed for handoff from curation to downstream steps
- –Best results require disciplined workflow configuration and review templates
- –Not a full end-to-end variant discovery replacement for alignment and calling
- –Automation depth is stronger for curation steps than for bespoke pipelines
- –Large cohort analyses can feel workflow-bound rather than throughput-first
Best for: Fits when genetic analysts need standardized, configurable variant curation and evidence reporting across studies.
Nextflow Tower
API-firstWorkflow operations platform for running and monitoring scalable genomics pipelines built with Nextflow.
Provenance and execution context captured per Nextflow run, linking parameters and artifacts to troubleshooting views.
Nextflow Tower from seqera.io is built around Nextflow workflow execution and job visibility for genome pipelines that already run as containers or on clusters. It centralizes run monitoring, log collection, and provenance so teams can troubleshoot BAM to VCF processing steps without digging through scheduler output.
Integration centers on Nextflow execution hooks and a management layer for environments that standardize inputs, parameters, and artifacts across repeated analyses. Governance is handled through workspace administration and access controls that support multi-user lab or department deployments.
- +Real-time workflow run monitoring with status and log surfacing for debugging
- +Provenance capture ties pipeline inputs, parameters, and outputs to each run
- +Works with existing Nextflow pipeline structure and execution model
- +Team workspaces support centralized operations for repeated genomics workflows
- –Best results depend on having pipelines implemented as Nextflow workflows
- –Genome-specific visualization stays limited compared with dedicated alignment browsers
- –Fine-grained audit trails can require additional configuration effort
- –Operational overhead increases when managing many heterogeneous compute backends
Best for: Fits when labs already run Nextflow and need centralized run tracking, provenance, and governance across teams.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 biotechnology pharmaceuticals, CLC Genomics Workbench stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right genome analysis software
Genome analysis software covers workflows from read alignment and BAM parsing through variant calling, VCF annotation, and downstream interpretation or reporting. This buyer’s guide covers CLC Genomics Workbench, BaseSpace Sequence Hub, Seven Bridges, and the other major platforms in this category.
Genome analysis software for variant calling, provenance, and interpretation workflows
Genome analysis software turns sequencing inputs such as FASTQ into analysis outputs like BAM, VCF, and structured variant reports using configurable pipelines and analysis steps. It also manages lineage so teams can trace which parameters produced which artifacts for review and export.
CLC Genomics Workbench is built around interactive pileup and alignment visualization tied directly into variant filtering and export steps, which supports rapid case-by-case inspection. BaseSpace Sequence Hub emphasizes run-to-result lineage across apps so sequencing outputs, execution steps, and published artifacts stay connected for repeatable routine NGS workflows.
Provenance, workflow control, and interpretation depth in genome analysis
Genome analysis tooling needs lineage so teams can trace which inputs and parameter settings produced BAM, VCF, and interpretation outputs. The guide emphasizes run-to-result and history provenance so review, export, and re-execution stay tied to the same analysis context.
The second focus is control depth because “workflow” and “automation” work differently across platforms. CLC Genomics Workbench emphasizes interactive pileup inspection tied to filtering and export, while Terra and DNAnexus center governed workflow execution and API-driven orchestration.
Interactive visualization tied to downstream filtering
CLC Genomics Workbench links interactive pileup and alignment visualization directly to variant filtering and export steps. This supports rapid case-by-case inspection without switching to separate viewers.
Run-to-result lineage across apps with artifact connectivity
BaseSpace Sequence Hub keeps sequencing outputs, execution steps, and published artifacts connected through app-based run lineage. This is built for traceability in routine NGS pipeline execution.
Interpretation-oriented evidence panels with reviewer filters
SOPHiA DDM focuses on curated evidence panels with interpretation-oriented variant exploration. Configurable reviewer filters support consistent case triage across batches.
Persisted workbooks for repeatable analysis history
Geneious Prime uses worksheets that tie input data, parameters, and results into a persistent, shareable analysis history. Integrated viewers keep alignments, variants, and assemblies inside one project timeline.
API-first governed workflow execution and structured outputs
DNAnexus pairs a workflow execution model with API-driven run orchestration. App packaging and file staging create clear input and output lineage per job.
Reusable workflow runs with shared workspaces and metadata access
Terra provides collaborative workflow execution with a programmatic API that exposes run metadata. Shared workspaces keep inputs, configs, and outputs together for audit-style review.
History-based rerunnable parameters with a large tool ecosystem
Galaxy captures provenance through history with reusable workflows and parameter capture. The ecosystem supports many genomics input and output formats inside shared interactive datasets.
Choose by workflow philosophy: interactive, governed workflow automation, or provenance-first reruns
The decision starts with how analysts need to work day-to-day. Some teams require interactive pileup review that updates filtering and export in one place, while other teams require governed workflows that can be launched, monitored, and re-run consistently across teams.
The next fork is the automation and integration surface. API-driven run orchestration matters when genome analysis is embedded into internal pipelines, while history-based provenance matters when rerunning parameters in shared environments is the repeatability mechanism.
Pick interactive inspection when manual review is a first-class workflow step
Choose CLC Genomics Workbench when variant review depends on interactive pileup and alignment visualization that ties directly into variant filtering and export. This approach reduces context switching during case-by-case decisions.
Pick app-to-artifact traceability when the lab needs run-to-result lineage
Choose BaseSpace Sequence Hub when sequencing outputs, execution steps, and published artifacts must stay connected for routine NGS runs. App-based workflow reuse reduces manual pipeline stitching while keeping published artifacts traceable to the run.
Pick governed workflow automation when jobs must be launched and retrieved as structured artifacts
Choose DNAnexus when API-first automation and governed workflow execution are required around variant and BAM-centric pipelines. Workflow lineage is maintained per job through reusable apps and clear file staging.
Pick collaborative, reusable workflow execution when teams need shared run context and reproducibility
Choose Terra when research groups require governed workflow execution with shared workspaces and programmatic access to run metadata. Workflow-driven execution keeps runs reproducible across teams and labs using shared configs and inputs.
Pick rerunnable histories when interactive review and re-execution are expected for shared datasets
Choose Galaxy when parameter capture inside histories and rerunnable workflows are the repeatability mechanism. Complex pipelines still require careful workflow design, and high-throughput runs need infrastructure planning beyond the UI.
Which teams match these genome analysis platforms
Genome analysis software fits best when the operating model matches the workflow control model. Tools that emphasize interactive review fit teams that spend time on pileup-level inspection and manual curation, while tools that emphasize workflow execution fit teams that need reproducible automation across multiple datasets and users.
The guide also differentiates by whether interpretation packaging is a core requirement or a later reporting step. SOPHiA DDM and Golden Helix VarSeq concentrate on curated reporting and reviewer-consistent outputs, while other platforms prioritize analysis execution and visualization.
Variant analysts who need interactive pileup inspection during filtering
CLC Genomics Workbench supports interactive read mapping and pileup review inside the analysis flow that feeds directly into variant filtering and export.
Illumina labs running routine NGS pipelines that require run-to-result traceability
BaseSpace Sequence Hub keeps sequencing outputs connected to app results through run-linked lineage and app-based workflow reuse.
Clinical or evidence packaging teams that must standardize review outputs
SOPHiA DDM provides curated evidence panels with configurable reviewer filters to package interpretation-oriented variant exploration at scale.
Lab ops teams that need API-driven orchestration across many jobs
DNAnexus supports API-driven run orchestration with reusable apps and clear file staging for governed automation.
Organizations already standardizing on Nextflow workflows and need centralized run governance
Nextflow Tower captures provenance and execution context per Nextflow run, linking parameters and artifacts to troubleshooting views.
Common buying pitfalls for genome analysis software
Several buying failures come from mismatched workflow control and automation expectations. Interactive analysis tools can become friction when developer teams require deep automation primitives, and workflow engines can become slow when analysts want one-off, exploratory runs.
Another failure is treating interpretation packaging as an add-on rather than a native workflow stage. Interpretation-oriented platforms like SOPHiA DDM and Golden Helix VarSeq focus on reviewer consistency and exportable reports, while general workflow platforms focus on execution and visualization.
Buying an interactive desktop-centric workflow when the lab needs API-first orchestration for automated pipelines
CLC Genomics Workbench is strong for interactive pileup and in-flow filtering, but its desktop workflow focus can limit fine-grained developer automation compared with API-first tools like DNAnexus and Terra.
Underestimating workflow authoring effort for platforms that require app or pipeline packaging
DNAnexus analysis depth depends on built-in coverage and external apps, and workflow authoring requires familiarity with DNAnexus app packaging conventions.
Expecting a single environment to handle variant discovery, calling tuning, and interpretation standards without setup work
SOPHiA DDM and Golden Helix VarSeq deliver reviewer-consistent reports, but they require upfront configuration and disciplined workflow templates for interpretation standards and reviewer practices.
Choosing rerunnable history provenance while ignoring throughput infrastructure planning
Galaxy can support reproducible histories with rerunnable parameters, but high-throughput runs require infrastructure planning beyond the UI.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated CLC Genomics Workbench, BaseSpace Sequence Hub, Seven Bridges, and the other major platforms using feature depth, workflow control, and ease of getting from inputs to structured outputs. Features account for 40% of the scoring and focus on how each platform ties outputs like BAM and VCF to review and export steps.
Ease and value each account for 30% of the scoring and reflect how directly analysts can reuse parameters and histories without additional engineering work. CLC Genomics Workbench ranked highest because its interactive pileup and alignment visualization ties directly into variant filtering and export steps, which shortens the review loop and keeps parameter choices visible within the analysis flow.
Frequently Asked Questions About genome analysis software
Which genome analysis tools support fast, repeatable NGS workflows?
How do genome analysis platforms connect with external systems?
What security and administration controls matter for shared genome projects?
When should a lab migrate existing pipelines into a genome analysis platform?
Where does genome analysis software fall short for custom or specialized workflows?
Which tools fit clinical variant interpretation and evidence review?
What data formats and analysis steps should a genome platform handle?
How can a team choose between desktop, web, and cloud execution?
What causes genome workflow results to become difficult to audit or reproduce?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Biotechnology Pharmaceuticals alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of biotechnology pharmaceuticals tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare biotechnology pharmaceuticals tools→