Top 10 Best File Managment Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Storage Moving Relocation

Top 10 Best File Managment Software of 2026

Compare the Top 10 Best File Managment Software tools for 2026, including Dropbox, Box, and Google Drive, and pick the right fit.

10 tools compared25 min readUpdated 6 days agoAI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

File management software determines how organizations store, move, and secure documents across devices and environments, including shared workflows and policy controls. This ranked list helps readers compare standout options and choose the best fit based on sync reliability, access governance, and relocation-friendly features, with Dropbox highlighted as a key example of cloud-first capability.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Dropbox

Smart Sync and selective sync to save disk space while retaining access

Built for teams needing consistent file sync, sharing, and version recovery.

2

Box

Editor pick

Box Governance and compliance controls for retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking

Built for enterprises managing shared content with strong governance and collaboration.

3

Google Drive

Editor pick

Version history with restore for Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive files

Built for teams collaborating in Google Workspace with strong sharing and search needs.

Comparison Table

This comparison table evaluates file storage and management tools used for document sharing, sync, and cloud object storage. It contrasts Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, Amazon S3, IBM Cloud Object Storage, and additional options across common decision criteria like storage model, access controls, collaboration features, and integration fit.

1
DropboxBest overall
cloud sync
9.2/10
Overall
2
enterprise content
8.9/10
Overall
3
cloud storage
8.6/10
Overall
4
object storage
8.3/10
Overall
5
8.0/10
Overall
6
consumer storage
7.7/10
Overall
7
secure sync
7.4/10
Overall
8
encrypted storage
7.1/10
Overall
9
enterprise file management
6.8/10
Overall
10
managed transfer
6.5/10
Overall
#1

Dropbox

cloud sync

Cloud storage and file synchronization with shared folders, version history, and admin controls for moving and relocating files across users and devices.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.3/10
Ease of Use9.1/10
Value9.2/10
Standout feature

Smart Sync and selective sync to save disk space while retaining access

Dropbox stands out for its cross-device file sync that keeps documents and folders continuously updated across computers and mobile devices. It centralizes file storage with searchable content, version history for files, and shared links for controlled collaboration. Teams can organize work with shared folders, permissions, and activity visibility, which reduces coordination overhead. Strong integrations support workflows with common productivity apps and third-party tools.

Pros
  • +Reliable background sync across desktop, mobile, and web
  • +Version history restores prior file states easily
  • +Flexible shared links and folder permissions for collaboration
  • +Strong search speeds up locating files and content
Cons
  • Large file transfers can feel slower on congested networks
  • Shared links can become hard to audit at scale
  • Offline edits require careful handling to avoid conflicts
  • Granular permission management takes more setup than basic sharing

Best for: Teams needing consistent file sync, sharing, and version recovery

#2

Box

enterprise content

Enterprise content management with file storage, permissions, collaboration workflows, retention, and migration features for relocation and sharing.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value9.1/10
Standout feature

Box Governance and compliance controls for retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking

Box distinguishes itself with strong enterprise-grade collaboration plus granular admin control for file security and access. It supports uploading, organizing, and sharing files with folder structures, permissions, and guest access when needed. Box also provides audit visibility, retention controls, and integrations through Box Drive and Box APIs to connect desktop workflows and systems. Document collaboration is handled through in-platform commenting, activity tracking, and workflow capabilities for managing approvals.

Pros
  • +Enterprise permission model with user, group, and granular sharing controls
  • +Audit logs for access, activity, and administrative changes
  • +Box Drive syncs content to desktops using managed endpoints
Cons
  • Complex admin configuration can slow time-to-setup for small teams
  • Some advanced workflows rely on additional configuration or integrations
  • External sharing governance can feel restrictive for ad-hoc sharing needs

Best for: Enterprises managing shared content with strong governance and collaboration

#3

Google Drive

cloud storage

Cloud file storage and sharing with granular access, offline support, and admin-backed controls for relocating files within organizations.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Version history with restore for Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive files

Google Drive stands out for deep integration with Google Workspace apps and shared team storage. It supports cloud file storage, folder organization, and real-time collaboration via Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides. Version history and advanced sharing controls help manage document changes and access across individuals and groups. Search across Drive content speeds up locating files, even within large libraries.

Pros
  • +Tight integration with Docs, Sheets, and Slides for collaborative editing
  • +Granular sharing controls for people, domains, and links
  • +Version history tracks edits and restores prior document states
  • +Powerful search finds files using names and content
  • +Cross-device access via web and mobile apps
Cons
  • Advanced admin controls can feel complex for smaller setups
  • Large file collaboration outside Google formats is less smooth
  • Shared drives require clear governance to avoid messy structure
  • Offline editing is limited and depends on device setup

Best for: Teams collaborating in Google Workspace with strong sharing and search needs

#4

Amazon S3

object storage

Object storage for moving files into buckets, using lifecycle policies and migration tooling for relocation at scale.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

S3 Lifecycle management for automated transitions, expiration, and intelligent tiering

Amazon S3 stands out for object storage built for extreme durability, scale, and global availability across regions. It provides secure file storage via IAM policies, bucket policies, and optional encryption with server-side or client-side keys. Core capabilities include versioning, lifecycle management for tiering and deletion, and event notifications for downstream automation. Standard tooling supports REST APIs plus SDKs for programmatic uploads, downloads, and bulk operations.

Pros
  • +Highly durable object storage designed for large-scale file retention
  • +Fine-grained access control with IAM and bucket policies
  • +Versioning and lifecycle rules automate retention, tiering, and deletion
  • +Event notifications integrate S3 changes with external processing
Cons
  • Object storage model lacks native filesystem semantics like directories
  • Managing complex policies can increase operational overhead
  • Large metadata and lifecycle complexity requires careful configuration
  • Cross-region workflows need explicit setup for replication

Best for: Enterprises needing secure, scalable object storage for long-term file retention

#5

IBM Cloud Object Storage

object storage

S3-compatible object storage with bucket organization and data migration support for relocating stored files.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

S3-compatible API access with lifecycle policies for automated storage tiering and retention

IBM Cloud Object Storage stands out for storing massive amounts of unstructured data in a durable, distributed object store. It supports S3-compatible APIs, making it practical for applications and tooling that already speak S3. Lifecycle management policies help control cost by moving objects through storage classes and expiring data. Event notifications and audit-ready access patterns support operational file management workflows at scale.

Pros
  • +S3-compatible APIs simplify migration from existing object storage tooling
  • +High durability design reduces risk for long-term file retention
  • +Lifecycle policies move objects between storage classes automatically
  • +Event notifications enable workflow triggers on object changes
  • +Strong access controls support separation of duties across teams
Cons
  • Not optimized for frequent file system style random reads
  • Directory semantics are minimal since storage is object based
  • Cross-region setups add complexity for consistent data access
  • Managing many buckets can increase operational overhead

Best for: Enterprises managing large unstructured files with S3-compatible application access

#6

pCloud

consumer storage

Consumer and small-business cloud storage with folder sharing and client sync designed for moving personal files between locations.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

pCloud Encrypted Drive for client-side encryption of selected folders

pCloud stands out for its hybrid-style approach that combines cloud storage with client-side syncing using desktop and mobile apps. Core file management includes folder organization, shared links, and multi-device access with offline availability through sync. It also supports version history for recovering prior file states and includes collaboration-friendly sharing controls. Admin and security options include granular access features and encrypted storage modes for sensitive files.

Pros
  • +Client-side sync keeps folders mirrored across desktop, mobile, and web
  • +Granular sharing options include links and access restrictions
  • +Version history helps restore previous file states after changes
  • +Optional encrypted storage protects selected files beyond basic encryption
  • +Efficient upload and download flows for large file folders
Cons
  • Encrypted storage mode adds operational steps for file access
  • Advanced collaboration features remain limited versus dedicated collaboration suites
  • Recovery options depend on versioning and prior sync behavior
  • Shared link management can require extra manual upkeep

Best for: Users needing secure cloud storage with reliable syncing and simple sharing

#7

Sync.com

secure sync

Secure cloud storage with client-side encryption, sharing links, and file sync for relocating files with controlled access.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Zero-knowledge, client-side encryption for stored files.

Sync.com stands out for security-first file storage built on client-side encryption and zero-knowledge design. It provides encrypted cloud drives, folder sharing, and controlled access for files across devices. Collaboration is supported with link-based sharing, permissions, and remote file previews without downloading. Administrative controls help teams manage user access and reduce accidental exposure during sharing.

Pros
  • +Client-side encryption with zero-knowledge model protects data from Sync servers.
  • +Granular sharing permissions support secure collaboration across folders.
  • +Version history helps recover prior file states after edits.
  • +Remote previews reduce unnecessary downloads of shared documents.
Cons
  • Desktop and mobile apps can feel less polished than top cloud drives.
  • Advanced collaboration tools are lighter than full productivity suites.
  • Sharing workflows rely heavily on permission configuration to stay secure.

Best for: Teams prioritizing encrypted storage and controlled sharing over broad collaboration suites

#8

Tresorit

encrypted storage

End-to-end encrypted file sharing and storage with synced folders and admin controls for relocating sensitive documents.

7.1/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

End-to-end encrypted storage with per-user device keys

Tresorit stands out for strong end-to-end encryption that protects files before they leave the device. It provides secure file storage with shared links, team folders, and controlled access for collaboration. Advanced sharing options include expiring links and permission rules that help limit exposure. Client apps support syncing across desktop and mobile to keep encrypted content up to date.

Pros
  • +End-to-end encryption keeps file contents unreadable to servers
  • +Granular sharing controls for links and team folders
  • +Cross-platform desktop and mobile apps with background sync
  • +Versioning supports recovery after edits and overwrites
  • +Server-side metadata minimization reduces exposure of file details
Cons
  • Sharing workflows can feel complex for large permission structures
  • Search and indexing are limited compared with non-encrypted storage
  • Admin visibility into file content is intentionally restricted
  • Offline access depends on local sync state accuracy

Best for: Teams needing encrypted file sharing with tight access controls

#9

Egnyte

enterprise file management

Enterprise file management with hybrid storage, web access, and policy controls that support migrations and relocation workflows.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

Granular permission and compliance-friendly activity auditing across shared folders

Egnyte stands out with an enterprise-focused hybrid approach that supports on-premise file storage plus cloud management in a single interface. Core capabilities include centralized file governance, granular permissions, and audit-ready activity logging across shared folders. Content collaboration is supported through managed sharing controls and secure access policies for internal and external users. Egnyte also provides administrative tooling for lifecycle management and data protection workflows.

Pros
  • +Hybrid storage support combines on-premise files with cloud administration
  • +Granular permissions and policy-based access control for shared content
  • +Detailed activity logs support auditing for file and user events
  • +Secure external sharing options with administrator governance controls
Cons
  • Complex admin configuration can slow early rollout for small teams
  • Advanced workflows require careful setup to avoid permission sprawl
  • User interface can feel heavy compared with simpler sync tools

Best for: Enterprises needing hybrid file governance and controlled collaboration

#10

Citrix ShareFile

managed transfer

Managed file transfer and secure storage with file routing, sharing permissions, and migration workflows for moving data.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.3/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Secure link sharing with expiration and granular folder permissions

Citrix ShareFile stands out with secure file sharing and managed file transfer workflows for business teams. It supports branded portals, role-based access controls, and expiring links for controlled external sharing. Admins can centralize storage organization with folder permissions and auditing to track document activity. Automated requests and workflows help route files for approval, collection, and handoffs across departments.

Pros
  • +Branded sharing portals with controlled access for external stakeholders
  • +Expiring links and permission controls for safer file distribution
  • +Folder-level security and admin oversight for organized document storage
  • +Activity auditing supports governance and incident investigation
Cons
  • Advanced workflow setup can require careful configuration and training
  • Interface can feel complex for users focused on simple uploads

Best for: Enterprises needing secure external sharing and managed file transfer workflows

How to Choose the Right File Managment Software

This buyer's guide covers how to select file management software for cloud sync, secure sharing, governance, and object storage workflows using tools including Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, Amazon S3, IBM Cloud Object Storage, pCloud, Sync.com, Tresorit, Egnyte, and Citrix ShareFile. It focuses on the specific capabilities highlighted by these products, such as Dropbox Smart Sync, Box Governance, Google Drive version history, and S3 lifecycle policies. It also maps those capabilities to real decision needs like encrypted sharing, hybrid governance, and managed external file transfer.

What Is File Managment Software?

File managment software centralizes file storage and helps users move files across devices, groups, and locations. It manages access with permissions and sharing controls, and it supports recovery workflows like version history and restore so teams can undo mistakes. It also enforces governance features like retention, audit logging, and expiring links for safer collaboration. Dropbox is a direct example for cross-device syncing and version recovery, while Box is a direct example for enterprise governance with audit-grade tracking.

Key Features to Look For

The right file management tool matches capabilities to how files are created, shared, secured, searched, and recovered in the real workflow.

  • Selective or optimized sync that preserves disk space

    Dropbox uses Smart Sync and selective sync so files remain accessible without fully consuming local disk space. This matters for teams that need consistent desktop workflows while keeping storage usage under control.

  • Version history and restore for recovering prior file states

    Google Drive provides version history with restore for Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive files so document edits can be rolled back. Dropbox also includes version history that makes restoring prior file states easy, which reduces the impact of accidental overwrites.

  • Governance for retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking

    Box Governance delivers retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking for enterprise shared content. Egnyte adds compliance-friendly activity auditing with granular permissions across shared folders so administrators can trace file and user events.

  • End-to-end or zero-knowledge encryption for secure sharing

    Sync.com uses client-side encryption with a zero-knowledge model so stored files are protected from Sync servers. Tresorit adds end-to-end encrypted storage with per-user device keys, and both products support controlled access via sharing links.

  • S3 lifecycle policies for automated transitions, expiration, and tiering

    Amazon S3 supports S3 Lifecycle management that automates transitions, expiration, and intelligent tiering for long-term retention. IBM Cloud Object Storage matches the S3-compatible pattern by using lifecycle policies to control storage class changes and cost.

  • Managed external sharing with expiring links and auditing

    Citrix ShareFile supports secure link sharing with expiration plus granular folder permissions and activity auditing. Dropbox also supports flexible shared links and folder permissions, while Dropbox can become harder to audit at scale, which makes Citrix ShareFile a stronger fit for managed distribution workflows.

How to Choose the Right File Managment Software

Pick the tool that aligns file movement, sharing controls, and recovery requirements with the operational model of the organization.

  • Match the storage model to the workflow

    Choose Dropbox when the priority is cross-device file synchronization with Smart Sync and selective sync for disk efficiency. Choose Amazon S3 or IBM Cloud Object Storage when the priority is object storage for durable, scalable retention using lifecycle rules and S3-compatible APIs.

  • Define recovery requirements before migrating content

    If recovery from document edits is critical inside the Google ecosystem, choose Google Drive because version history includes restore for Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive files. If recovery for mixed file types and folder structures is needed across devices, choose Dropbox because version history restores prior file states easily.

  • Lock down access with governance features that fit the organization size

    Choose Box for retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking when enterprise governance must cover shared content. Choose Egnyte when hybrid governance is required because it combines on-premise file storage with cloud administration and policy-based access plus detailed activity logs.

  • Select encryption strength based on who must be able to read data

    Choose Sync.com for zero-knowledge, client-side encryption so stored files stay protected from Sync servers while sharing uses permissions and remote previews. Choose Tresorit when end-to-end encryption is required with per-user device keys and expiring or tightly controlled sharing links.

  • Use managed sharing tools for external stakeholders and approvals

    Choose Citrix ShareFile when branded portals, expiring links, and workflow routing for approval and collection are required for external stakeholders. Choose Dropbox for internal team collaboration with shared folders and flexible shared links, but plan for link audit complexity when sharing scales.

Who Needs File Managment Software?

Different teams need different combinations of sync, sharing controls, governance, and encryption to manage files safely and efficiently.

  • Teams needing consistent file sync, sharing, and version recovery

    Dropbox fits this segment because it delivers reliable background sync across desktop, mobile, and web plus version history for restoring prior file states. Google Drive also fits teams working inside Google Workspace because version history with restore works for Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive files.

  • Enterprises managing shared content with strong governance and collaboration

    Box fits enterprises because it provides Box Governance with retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking plus audit logs for access and administrative changes. Egnyte also fits enterprise governance needs because it supports hybrid storage and compliance-friendly activity auditing across shared folders.

  • Teams and developers needing secure, scalable object storage for long-term retention

    Amazon S3 is the fit when extreme durability and automated retention are required through S3 lifecycle policies plus IAM and bucket policies. IBM Cloud Object Storage fits when S3-compatible APIs must connect existing tooling to lifecycle-driven storage tiering and retention.

  • Teams prioritizing encryption-first sharing with tight access controls

    Sync.com fits teams that need zero-knowledge, client-side encryption and controlled link-based sharing with remote previews. Tresorit fits teams that require end-to-end encrypted storage with per-user device keys and granular sharing controls like expiring links.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Several recurring pitfalls appear across the reviewed tools when file movement and security requirements are mismatched to product capabilities.

  • Treating object storage like a shared file system

    Amazon S3 and IBM Cloud Object Storage use an object storage model that lacks native filesystem directory semantics, which makes workflows that assume filesystem behavior harder to implement. These tools are built for buckets, lifecycle rules, and APIs rather than shared-folder navigation.

  • Overlooking encryption tradeoffs that affect search and admin visibility

    Tresorit limits search and indexing compared with non-encrypted storage, and admin visibility into file content is intentionally restricted. Sync.com also centers security-first design with client-side encryption, so file management should be planned around encrypted access rather than server-side indexing.

  • Underestimating admin setup complexity for governance-heavy platforms

    Box can require complex admin configuration that slows time to setup for small teams. Egnyte can similarly feel heavy in interface and requires careful permission and workflow setup to avoid permission sprawl.

  • Scaling shared links without an auditing plan

    Dropbox shared links can become hard to audit at scale, and that can undermine governance when external distribution grows. Citrix ShareFile focuses on expiring links and activity auditing, which reduces the auditing burden for distributed collaboration.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features have weight 0.4, ease of use has weight 0.3, and value has weight 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average of those three values using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Dropbox separated itself with strong features tied to everyday use such as Smart Sync and selective sync for disk space savings while also delivering reliable background sync across desktop, mobile, and web.

Frequently Asked Questions About File Managment Software

Which file management tool is best for continuous cross-device syncing?
Dropbox is designed for cross-device file sync so folders and documents stay current across desktop and mobile. It also supports Smart Sync and selective sync to keep storage use lower while preserving access.
How do enterprise governance features differ between Box, Egnyte, and ShareFile?
Box emphasizes Box Governance with retention, eDiscovery, and audit-grade tracking for shared content. Egnyte focuses on hybrid file governance with centralized permissions and audit-ready activity logging across shared folders. Citrix ShareFile centers on managed sharing through role-based access controls, expiring links, and auditing for external document activity.
Which option is strongest for collaboration inside a suite, not just file storage?
Google Drive is tightly integrated with Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides for real-time collaboration and shared team storage. Dropbox and Box support collaboration through shared folders and in-platform or activity-based collaboration features, but Drive’s co-authoring workflows are centered on Workspace documents.
What tool set works best for encrypted storage and privacy-focused sharing?
Sync.com uses client-side encryption and a zero-knowledge design, so stored files remain encrypted before they reach the cloud. Tresorit provides end-to-end encryption that protects files before leaving the device and adds expiring link sharing plus per-user device keys.
Which products support secure external file sharing with expiring links?
Citrix ShareFile provides expiring links and role-based access controls for external sharing. Tresorit also supports expiring links with permission rules to reduce exposure. Dropbox and Box support link sharing, but ShareFile and Tresorit pair expiring links with stronger external access controls as core workflow features.
How do Amazon S3 and IBM Cloud Object Storage fit file management workflows differently than sync-and-share tools?
Amazon S3 stores objects with durability and region-based availability using IAM and bucket policies plus versioning and lifecycle management. IBM Cloud Object Storage offers S3-compatible APIs, lifecycle policies for tiering and deletion, and event notifications, which suits application-driven content management rather than end-user desktop syncing.
Which tool is most useful when S3-compatible integration with existing systems is required?
Amazon S3 is built around REST APIs and SDKs for programmatic uploads, downloads, and bulk operations. IBM Cloud Object Storage supports S3-compatible APIs, which helps reuse tooling that already speaks S3 for controlled object lifecycle and automation.
How can teams recover files after accidental edits or deletions?
Dropbox maintains version history for files, which supports recovery from earlier states after changes. Google Drive offers version history with restore for Drive files and Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides. pCloud also provides version history to recover prior file states.
Which platform is best for hybrid setups that combine on-prem storage with cloud management?
Egnyte is designed for hybrid governance by combining on-premise file storage with cloud management in one interface. This includes granular permissions and audit-ready activity logging across shared folders, while still supporting controlled internal and external collaboration.
What are common technical requirements for getting started with these tools on day one?
Dropbox, pCloud, Sync.com, and Tresorit typically require installing desktop and mobile apps to enable syncing and local offline access where supported. Amazon S3 and IBM Cloud Object Storage require API or SDK integration through IAM or S3-compatible access patterns, while Box and Google Drive rely on browser-based access plus optional desktop sync or Drive and Box Drive workflow components.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 storage moving relocation, Dropbox stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Dropbox

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.