GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Equipment Rental LeasingTop 10 Best Equipment Lending Software of 2026
Top 10 equipment lending software rankings for rentals with key features and tradeoffs, including Asset Panda, Sapient Asset Management, Sharetribe.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Asset Panda is the strongest fit for mid-size to large teams that want automated, rules-driven equipment checkout with scan-based returns and clear circulation reporting, whereas Sapient Asset Management works best for lending teams needing governed reservations and overdue renewal workflows.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Asset Panda
Loan enforcement stays attached to each item’s scan event, so renewals and overdue actions follow the actual circulation record.
Built for fits when mid-size to large teams need automated checkout rules with scan-based returns and strong circulation reporting..
Sapient Asset Management
Editor pickPolicy-driven renewal rules that carry into overdue handling without manual recalculation across loans.
Built for fits when lending teams need governed reservations, consistent due dates, and renewal and overdue workflows..
Sharetribe
Editor pickMarketplace workflow configuration that turns listings and reservation requests into a host-managed lending process.
Built for fits when equipment lending runs inside a marketplace with flexible participants and reservation logic..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Equipment lending software turns checkouts, reservations, and returns into governed workflows with audit logs and configurable permissions. This ranked list supports analysts and operators who need measurable fit across asset data models, API and integration paths, and throughput under real inventory loads, with the ordering based on lending workflow coverage and operational controls rather than feature counts.
Asset Panda
enterpriseConfigurable asset management software with equipment checkout and workflow automation.
Loan enforcement stays attached to each item’s scan event, so renewals and overdue actions follow the actual circulation record.
Asset Panda’s equipment inventory and catalog work together so each item can carry status, location, and circulation history. Borrower records and patron accounts connect to reservation and checkout flows, including renewals and overdue workflows. Auditability shows up in circulation reports and return inspection tracking that links damage assessments to specific loan events.
A tradeoff appears in governance depth when teams need complex multi-tenant workflows or deeply customized approval chains, which can require careful role design. Asset Panda fits campuses or internal service organizations that run high-volume borrowing with barcode and QR based check-in and need consistent loan period enforcement.
- +Configurable loan periods with renewal and overdue rules tied to each checkout
- +QR code and barcode scanning streamline checkout station and mobile returns
- +Kit and component management supports accessory tracking for bundled equipment
- +Circulation reports tie borrower activity to equipment history
- –Highly customized governance requires disciplined RBAC design
- –Advanced kiosk flows depend on device setup and scanner reliability
- –Deep integration work can take time when synchronizing multiple directory sources
Campus equipment managers
High-volume reservations and checkouts
Fewer late returns and disputes
Maintenance and compliance teams
Track condition and damage per loan
Cleaner escalation and repair history
Show 2 more scenarios
IT asset coordinators
Borrowing with accessories and kits
Reduced missing components
Kit and component management ensures complete accessory tracking for each issued set.
Operations directors
Utilization and circulation reporting
Actionable utilization metrics
Circulation reports summarize borrower activity and equipment usage from each reservation and loan.
Best for: Fits when mid-size to large teams need automated checkout rules with scan-based returns and strong circulation reporting.
More related reading
Sapient Asset Management
vertical specialistAsset and equipment management system with tool lending and crib management features.
Policy-driven renewal rules that carry into overdue handling without manual recalculation across loans.
Sapient Asset Management fits lending libraries, facilities groups, and campus departments that must coordinate borrower accounts with item-level tracking inside one circulation process. The core workflow covers equipment checkout, equipment reservation, and due-date management, with renewal rules and overdue workflows built for ongoing lending operations.
A common tradeoff appears in setup effort, because asset catalog structure and circulation policies must be configured to match local lending rules before automation becomes reliable. It works best when the library staff runs consistent loan periods, enforces return inspection steps, and needs circulation reports tied to borrower activity.
- +Configurable loan periods and due-date handling
- +Renewal rules and overdue workflows for ongoing lending
- +Borrower-account centric circulation tracking
- +Admin controls designed for governance and traceability
- –Best results require upfront asset catalog configuration discipline
- –Limited evidence of kiosk-grade self-service from circulation flows
- –Deep policy changes can slow staff processes during rollout
- –Reporting usefulness depends on how assets are categorized
Campus facilities lending staff
Manage recurring equipment for departments
Fewer manual deadline corrections
Library operations managers
Run reservation to checkout cycles
Lower backlog and follow-ups
Show 2 more scenarios
Asset inventory administrators
Maintain item status and circulation history
Cleaner accountability for items
Asset catalog entries connect to borrower activity so returns and policy outcomes stay auditable.
Risk and compliance leads
Standardize lending governance
More consistent governance evidence
Controlled admin processes provide traceable changes for circulation policies and borrower-related events.
Best for: Fits when lending teams need governed reservations, consistent due dates, and renewal and overdue workflows.
Sharetribe
SMBMarketplace platform for peer-to-peer equipment rental and lending operations.
Marketplace workflow configuration that turns listings and reservation requests into a host-managed lending process.
Sharetribe provides core marketplace building blocks like catalog listings, request and reservation flows, and user account management that map to equipment reservation and borrower records. Configuration happens through marketplace settings and workflow logic, which supports many lending variants such as member-to-member lending or host-managed inventory. Automation typically relies on built-in notifications and event-driven integration points rather than a dedicated lending-ops engine.
A tradeoff appears when teams need deep circulation specifics like renewal rules, due-date management, and overdue workflows with granular loan-cycle reporting. Sharetribe fits best when the equipment lending process is a subset of a broader marketplace model, or when lending needs match custom availability and participant rules more than barcode-centric operations.
- +Configurable marketplace workflow supports custom lending reservation paths
- +Strong participant and moderation tooling for multi-party lending
- +API integration options for connecting inventory, identity, and reporting systems
- +Works for member-to-member equipment lending models
- –Not a dedicated lending library management engine
- –Loan-cycle controls like overdue and renewals need extra workflow work
- –Barcode scanning and checkout-station requirements require custom integration
Marketplace product teams
Host-managed equipment reservations
Fewer manual handoffs
Community organizers
Member-to-member gear lending
Controlled lending community
Show 2 more scenarios
Systems integration teams
Inventory sync and notifications
Kept availability in sync
Integrations connect external equipment inventory and downstream reporting to marketplace events.
Operations teams
Custom lending eligibility checks
Fewer invalid reservations
Workflow rules enforce membership requirements and approve reservation requests before checkout.
Best for: Fits when equipment lending runs inside a marketplace with flexible participants and reservation logic.
ToolHound
vertical specialistTool and equipment tracking system focused on construction and industrial lending.
Event history per asset ties every lending action to reporting fields for tighter governance and faster troubleshooting.
ToolHound supports equipment lending library management with workflows for checkouts, returns, and asset-level tracking. It centers on an asset catalog with inventory details and accessory linkage so kits and components stay tied to the right loan.
Borrower records and due-date handling feed automated overdue and renewal behaviors, reducing manual chasing. The main differentiator is how ToolHound ties lending events back to asset history for reporting and governance.
- +Asset checkout and return history tied to each item
- +Accessory and kit component tracking keeps loans accurate
- +Overdue and renewal workflows reduce manual follow-up
- +Circulation-style reporting supports utilization and tracking
- –Advanced automation requires admin workflow setup discipline
- –Barcode or RFID capture support is limited to specific checkout flows
- –Audit visibility depends on configured event logging scope
- –External system connections are less flexible than API-first tools
Best for: Fits when mid-size organizations need asset-level lending workflows plus usable reporting across checkout cycles.
Booqable
SMBOnline rental software for inventory, reservations, payments, and equipment order fulfillment.
API integration for building custom checkout and borrower workflows around Booqable lending data.
Booqable manages equipment lending by combining an asset catalog with reservation and checkout workflows. It handles borrower records and loan periods with due-date management, plus returns that can capture inspection and condition notes.
Admin configuration supports multi-user access and operational controls for asset availability and circulation reporting. Integrations and automation are a focus through an API-first approach that can connect Booqable to identity and external front ends like checkout stations.
- +API supports connecting external checkout flows and systems
- +Asset catalog ties inventory items to reservation and loan rules
- +Due-date and renewal workflows reduce manual overdue handling
- +Borrower records centralize circulation history per patron
- –Advanced configuration can require process alignment across teams
- –Complex kit and component tracking needs careful setup
- –Return inspection and damage capture depend on consistent staff usage
- –Reporting depth for utilization and audits may need export workflows
Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need controlled equipment circulation with reservation logic and API-driven integrations.
Cheqroom
vertical specialistEquipment management software with reservations, checkouts, returns, and audit trails.
Loan lifecycle management with rule-driven due dates, renewals, and overdue handling tied to borrower records.
Cheqroom is an equipment lending management tool aimed at organizations that need structured asset checkout and return workflows. It focuses on asset cataloging with lending rules such as loan periods, due-date management, renewal options, and overdue handling tied to borrower records.
The system also supports operational messaging like email notifications around lending events and return status. Admin tooling centers on user access controls and audit-friendly activity tracking to support governance across lending operations.
- +Lending rules cover loan periods, due dates, renewals, and overdue workflows
- +Asset catalog structure fits common lending library needs
- +Event-driven email notifications for key checkout and return moments
- +Borrower records track loan history tied to active circulation
- –Barcode scanning and QR or RFID checkout are not clearly documented for all setups
- –Advanced kit and accessory-level tracking may require manual structuring work
- –API and integration surfaces are limited for complex automation demands
- –Role and permission setup can require careful planning for multi-department use
Best for: Fits when a mid-size lending program needs rule-based checkout and overdue workflows with borrower history.
MyTurn
vertical specialistLending management software for libraries, tool libraries, and community resource programs.
Date-aware availability and holds logic tied to each asset’s circulation status, not a separate manual scheduler.
MyTurn is built for equipment circulation with borrower requests and staff-managed checkouts, returns, and renewals.
Its asset catalog supports inventory organization that ties directly to availability by date and active loan status.
Administrative governance supports control over who can request and how loans progress through the lending lifecycle.
- +Reservation and checkout workflow reduces coordination between staff and borrowers
- +Availability varies by date to support holds and overlapping loan periods
- +Equipment catalog supports accessory tracking within the lending record
- +Loan lifecycle supports renewals and due-date driven follow-up
- –API integration depth is limited compared with platforms aimed at enterprise deployments
- –Advanced condition tracking and maintenance history require careful process setup
- –Returns and inspections can be operationally strict without standardized staff steps
- –Role configuration lacks granular workflows for multi-approval scenarios
Best for: Fits when campuses or teams need date-based reservations and clear circulation workflows without heavy IT customization.
Rentman
vertical specialistRental management software for equipment planning, scheduling, logistics, and crew operations.
Reservation scheduling tied directly into lending execution reduces date drift between planning and checkout.
Rentman is equipment lending software focused on managing reservations, checkout, and return workflows with a structured asset catalog. It supports controlled circulation through loan periods, availability handling, and centralized borrower and item records.
Admin users get auditability around lending events, plus configuration options for policies like due dates and renewals. Automation and integration options target operational throughput in organizations that lend across teams, sites, or departments.
- +Reservation-to-checkout workflow keeps lending dates consistent across teams.
- +Asset catalog supports detailed item records and accessories for kitting needs.
- +Policy configuration drives due-date rules and renewal handling without custom work.
- +Lending event history supports operational audit and dispute investigation.
- –Barcode scanning and QR checkout require dedicated workflow setup at the checkout point.
- –Complex kit component rules can increase admin overhead for large item libraries.
- –Cross-site governance can need careful RBAC planning to avoid staff confusion.
- –Extensive reporting often depends on data being entered consistently for each item.
Best for: Fits when mid-size organizations need controlled equipment reservation workflows with policy-driven checkout and return.
Current RMS
vertical specialistRental management software for equipment availability, quotes, bookings, and returns.
Loan events store return and condition documentation at the item level for audit-ready circulation history.
Current RMS manages equipment lending workflows with an asset catalog, borrower records, and loan period controls. The system tracks checkout and return events and supports condition and damage documentation tied to specific items.
Admin configuration governs who can circulate assets and how due dates and renewals are handled across lending cycles. Reporting focuses on circulation and utilization so teams can audit activity and spot availability patterns.
- +Asset catalog plus item-level circulation history
- +Return and condition notes attached to each loan event
- +Admin governance for loan periods and renewal rules
- +Circulation and utilization reports support inventory oversight
- –Barcode or scanner workflows require consistent item tagging
- –Automation options for holds queues and waitlists feel limited
- –Integration depth for external identity and directories can be narrow
- –Advanced customization needs careful configuration discipline
Best for: Fits when institutions need item-level lending records, renewals control, and circulation reporting with admin governance.
Sortly
SMBVisual inventory software with barcode scanning, asset records, and quantity tracking.
QR code checkout linked to per-asset details and custom fields reduces data entry during returns.
Sortly is a visual equipment lending and asset tracking tool that uses an asset catalog built around categories, images, and locations. It supports equipment checkout workflows with due-date tracking, check-in and return logging, and configurable loan periods.
Users can scan QR codes for faster checkouts and can attach custom fields for condition notes, accessories, and borrower details. It also supports notifications and reporting that help admins track overdue items and circulation history.
- +QR code scanning speeds up checkouts and return logging
- +Category and photo-based asset organization improves catalog navigation
- +Custom fields capture condition, accessories, and internal notes
- +Overdue and circulation reporting supports basic lending oversight
- –Advanced renewal rules are limited compared with larger lending suites
- –Roles and governance controls are not as granular as enterprise RBAC needs
- –Complex kit and component relationships require careful catalog design
- –API and automation coverage is narrower than platforms built for integrations
Best for: Fits when teams need QR-driven checkouts and quick asset cataloging without heavy workflow customization.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 equipment rental leasing, Asset Panda stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right equipment lending software
Equipment lending software manages equipment checkout and return workflows by binding loan periods, due dates, renewals, and overdue actions to each asset’s circulation record. This guide covers Asset Panda, Sapient Asset Management, Sharetribe, ToolHound, Booqable, Cheqroom, MyTurn, Rentman, Current RMS, and Sortly.
Across these tools, the key differentiators show up in how scan events and policy rules propagate through lending history, how reservations turn into actual checkout execution, and how far automation and API integration extend beyond basic cataloging. Asset Panda is singled out for scan-attached enforcement that keeps renewal and overdue actions aligned with the item’s checkout events.
Equipment lending software for checkout, reservations, and rule-driven loan lifecycle management
Equipment lending software coordinates borrower records, equipment inventory, and loan periods so staff and borrowers can reserve items, check them out, renew them, and complete return inspection workflows with consistent due-date behavior. In Asset Panda, configurable loan periods with renewal and overdue rules attach to each checkout scan event so the enforcement path stays tied to the item’s actual circulation record.
Other platforms emphasize different control points, such as Cheqroom where rule-driven due dates, renewals, and overdue handling link to borrower records through the loan lifecycle. Booqable shifts the integration focus toward an API-driven approach for building custom checkout and borrower workflows around the lending and reservation data, which changes how teams extend the system into external processes.
Key capabilities that decide equipment lending control depth
Equipment lending teams need enforcement to remain attached to the asset’s actual circulation events so renewals and overdue actions cannot drift from what happened at checkout. Asset Panda keeps loan enforcement tied to each item’s scan event so renewal and overdue actions follow the real circulation record.
Control also depends on how reservations turn into executed lending and how rules propagate through the loan lifecycle. Sapient Asset Management uses policy-driven renewal rules that carry into overdue handling without manual recalculation across loans, while Rentman links reservation scheduling directly into lending execution to reduce date drift between planning and checkout.
Scan-anchored loan enforcement
Asset Panda ties loan enforcement to each item’s scan event so renewals and overdue actions track the actual checkout record. Current RMS stores return and condition documentation at the item-level for audit-ready loan event history.
Policy-driven renewal and overdue rule propagation
Sapient Asset Management carries renewal rules into overdue handling without recalculation across loans. Cheqroom uses rule-driven due dates, renewals, and overdue handling tied to borrower records across the loan lifecycle.
Reservations to checkout execution without date drift
Rentman links reservation scheduling directly into lending execution to keep lending dates consistent across teams. MyTurn ties holds and reservations to each asset’s circulation status so availability varies by date instead of relying on a separate manual scheduler.
Marketplace-style lending workflow configuration
Sharetribe configures marketplace workflows so listings and reservation requests convert into a host-managed lending process. Other systems handle reservations, but Sharetribe’s standout is multi-party marketplace reservation logic and moderation tooling.
Asset-level event history for governance and troubleshooting
ToolHound records event history per asset so every lending action maps to reporting fields for tighter governance and faster troubleshooting. Asset Panda reinforces the same governance need by attaching renewal and overdue paths to scan events.
API extensibility for custom borrower and checkout workflows
Booqable provides an API that supports connecting external checkout flows and systems to Booqable lending data. Booqable also links asset catalog records to reservation and loan rules so external workflows can stay aligned to inventory items.
Decision framework for matching lending workflows to automation and control
The fastest way to choose is to start with the control point that must stay correct during edge cases like renewal changes and returns with damage notes. For scan-heavy operations, the enforcement path needs to attach to the scan record like Asset Panda does.
Then decide how the organization expects to configure lending rules. Sapient Asset Management and Cheqroom emphasize policy-driven rule propagation, while Booqable emphasizes API-driven extensibility for teams that build custom checkout and borrower flows around lending and reservation data.
Pick the system of record for enforcement
If checkout happens at scanners or a QR station, select Asset Panda because renewals and overdue actions follow the item’s scan event. If audit history must retain return and condition notes at item loan events, select Current RMS because its loan events store return and condition documentation per item.
Choose your rule philosophy for due dates and renewals
If renewal logic must automatically carry into overdue handling without manual recalculation, select Sapient Asset Management because its renewal rules propagate into overdue workflows. If borrower-record-linked due dates and overdue workflows must be rule-driven inside one lending lifecycle, select Cheqroom because its lending rules cover loan periods, due dates, renewals, and overdue workflows tied to borrower records.
Decide whether reservations must execute inside the same workflow
If the dates scheduled for reservations must stay aligned when staff check the asset out, select Rentman because it ties reservation scheduling into lending execution. If holds and availability must be computed by date from each asset’s circulation status, select MyTurn because availability varies by date to support holds and overlapping loan periods.
Choose between dedicated lending automation and marketplace orchestration
If lending runs as a marketplace process with multiple participant roles, select Sharetribe because it configures marketplace workflows that turn reservation requests into host-managed lending. If the operation needs an equipment lending library engine where governance stays focused on asset and loan events, choose ToolHound or Asset Panda instead.
Validate automation depth against admin workflow capacity
If automation must handle asset-level history and governance at scale, select ToolHound because each asset’s event history ties lending actions to reporting fields. If the team can invest in disciplined configuration, select Asset Panda because RBAC governance requires disciplined RBAC design for highly customized governance.
Plan the integration surface before implementation
If external systems must drive borrower journeys and checkout steps, select Booqable because its API supports connecting external checkout flows and systems around Booqable lending data. If the current plan relies on native checkout flows without heavy custom integrations, select Sortly because QR code checkout is tied to per-asset details and custom fields to reduce data entry.
Who should buy equipment lending software based on workflow fit
Equipment lending software fits teams whose checkout and return work depends on consistent due-date management, renewal rules, and overdue workflows tied to the same asset history. The strongest matches come from either scan-anchored enforcement at the checkout point or rule-driven governance inside the loan lifecycle.
Different tools align to different operating models. Asset Panda fits teams that need automated checkout rules with scan-based returns and strong circulation reporting, while Sharetribe fits organizations that run lending as a marketplace workflow with reservation logic between multiple parties.
Mid-size to large lending teams running scan-based checkout stations
Asset Panda fits scan-based operations because loan enforcement stays attached to each item’s scan event and renewals and overdue actions follow the real circulation record. The tool also supports QR code and barcode scanning for checkout station and mobile returns.
Institutions that want governed reservations and consistent due dates
Sapient Asset Management fits lending programs that need renewal rules and overdue handling to stay consistent through governed reservations and due-date management. Cheqroom also fits when borrower-record-linked due dates and overdue workflows must run through rule-driven lending.
Campus programs and teams with date-based holds and overlapping loan periods
MyTurn fits campus-like workflows because availability varies by date and holds logic ties to each asset’s circulation status. Rentman fits when reservation scheduling must stay consistent through checkout execution.
Multi-party marketplace operators managing host-based lending
Sharetribe fits marketplace lending where reservation requests convert into host-managed lending workflows. It also includes participant and moderation tooling designed for multi-party lending.
Organizations building custom borrower and checkout journeys with integrations
Booqable fits when teams need API-driven extensibility for custom checkout and borrower workflows connected to lending and reservation data. ToolHound fits when asset-level event history and reporting fields matter more than external workflow construction.
Common buying and rollout mistakes in equipment lending software
Most failures happen when rule ownership and enforcement attachment are not validated against real checkout and return behavior. Another frequent failure is choosing a tool that fits the catalog workflow but does not fit the automation and governance required for renewals, overdue actions, and return inspection records.
A third failure is underestimating how kiosk flows and scanning workflows depend on operational setup and consistent tagging. Barcode and QR workflows often require structured device or workflow configuration to prevent staff workarounds that break the loan event trail.
Selecting a tool that separates reservation scheduling from actual checkout execution
Rentman avoids date drift by tying reservation scheduling directly into lending execution. If reservation execution drift matters, require evidence that the checkout step consumes the scheduled reservation workflow like Rentman does.
Treating renewal logic as a one-time staff calculation instead of a propagated rule
Sapient Asset Management carries renewal rules into overdue handling without manual recalculation across loans. Cheqroom also keeps renewals and overdue workflows rule-driven through the lending lifecycle tied to borrower records.
Assuming advanced scan capture works equally across all checkout flows
Asset Panda supports QR code and barcode scanning for checkout station and mobile returns, but Asset Panda’s kiosk workflows depend on device setup and scanner reliability. Current RMS and ToolHound also require consistent item tagging so scan workflows map cleanly to item-level loan history.
Overlooking the governance design effort for role-based controls
Asset Panda can support highly customized governance, but it requires disciplined RBAC design. If governance discipline is low, select a tool with simpler governance expectations like Rentman for reservation-to-checkout workflows or Sortly for QR-driven checkouts with fewer workflow customization paths.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated equipment lending software across features coverage, ease of use, and value, then weighted features at 40% because renewal, overdue handling, and return records are where organizations usually feel the operational cost. Ease and value each received 30% weight because scan station workflows and staff adoption strongly affect whether loan rules run consistently.
Asset Panda separated itself through scan-anchored enforcement that keeps renewals and overdue actions attached to each item’s scan event, and through configurable loan periods with renewal and overdue rules tied to each checkout. This combination produced the highest overall score and the strongest fit for teams that depend on accurate circulation record propagation from checkout through overdue workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About equipment lending software
How do Asset Panda and EZRentOut-style lending flows differ in enforcing renewal and overdue actions?
Which tool is best for integrating lending with identity systems using SSO and access control controls?
How should data migration be handled when switching from spreadsheets or a legacy inventory system?
What do admin controls look like for reservation approvals, user permissions, and audit trails?
When do date-based reservations and holds queue logic matter most during peak demand?
Which tool supports item-level condition and damage documentation tied to return events?
What breaks if scan-based check-in or QR checkout is unreliable in Asset Panda or Sortly?
How do accessory tracking and kit management differ across Asset Panda, ToolHound, and Current RMS?
How do reporting and utilization views differ when comparing ToolHound, Asset Panda, and Rentman?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Equipment Rental Leasing alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of equipment rental leasing tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare equipment rental leasing tools→