GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW
Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Energy Consumption Software of 2026
Rank the top energy consumption software with criteria and tradeoffs for facilities teams, covering tools like ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
EnergyCAP is the strongest pick if facilities teams need disciplined, recurring utility reporting across many sites, whereas GridPoint works better for multi-site operators focused on interval-driven monitoring, and Energy Elephant suits smaller teams that want recurring utility data refresh and controlled setup.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
EnergyCAP
EnergyCAP’s measurement and verification workflow keeps savings reporting anchored to baseline logic and adjustment events tied to metering history.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need recurring utility reporting plus disciplined measurement and verification across many sites.
IBM Envizi
Editor pickRule-driven energy and emissions calculation configuration tied to enterprise reporting boundaries and reference data management.
Best for: Fits when enterprise energy teams need governed calculations and repeatable reporting across many sites.
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager
Editor pickENERGY STAR benchmarking calculations tie energy totals to EUI and standardized reporting outputs.
Best for: Fits when consistent benchmarking and portfolio reporting across many buildings matter most.
Comparison Table
EnergyCAP
enterpriseEnergyCAP manages utility invoices, energy consumption, costs, and sustainability data.
EnergyCAP’s measurement and verification workflow keeps savings reporting anchored to baseline logic and adjustment events tied to metering history.
EnergyCAP is built around portfolio reporting, where recurring utility data flows feed standardized metrics like energy use intensity and savings baselines tied to project work. The system supports data ingestion for utility and meter reads and maintains the history needed for trend reporting and compliance-style review cycles. Configuration can be standardized across sites, which reduces manual effort when onboarding new meters or facilities.
A tradeoff is that EnergyCAP configuration for complex tariff logic and multi-source data mapping can require administrator time before dashboards and M&V outputs stabilize. EnergyCAP fits best when an organization already has consistent utility feeds or interval exports and wants recurring reporting plus disciplined savings verification across projects.
- +Portfolio rollups keep EUI, trends, and savings tied to meter history
- +M&V workflows support disciplined baseline and adjustment handling
- +Configurable imports and scheduled refresh reduce manual reporting work
- +Role-based controls and audit trail support multi-site governance
- –Tariff and mapping complexity can slow onboarding for new meter types
- –Advanced reporting customization depends on administrator configuration
- –Data cleansing gaps in source files surface during dashboard validation
Energy management teams
Monthly portfolio reporting and EUI tracking
Lower manual reporting effort
Sustainability program owners
Savings-backed carbon and performance narratives
More defensible savings claims
Show 2 more scenarios
Facilities analytics teams
Interval data refresh into dashboards
Faster variance detection
Scheduled updates move metering changes into reporting so teams can react to abnormal usage patterns.
Program governance leads
Multi-site access and audit controls
Tighter internal controls
EnergyCAP uses role-based access and auditability so changes and reporting actions stay traceable.
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need recurring utility reporting plus disciplined measurement and verification across many sites.
IBM Envizi
enterpriseIBM Envizi centralizes energy, emissions, utility, and sustainability data for enterprise reporting.
Rule-driven energy and emissions calculation configuration tied to enterprise reporting boundaries and reference data management.
IBM Envizi supports utility and operational data workflows where consumption history must be normalized and mapped to organizational structures like sites, assets, and reporting boundaries. Its configuration centers on business rules for energy and emissions calculations, which helps align teams on the same EnPIs and carbon factors. The automation model favors scheduled data loads and repeatable calculation runs rather than one-off spreadsheets.
A key tradeoff is that Envizi administration typically requires careful upfront configuration of mappings, reference data, and calculation logic to keep results consistent across units. It fits teams running recurring utility bill processing or interval meter ingestion where governance controls, change tracking, and standardized outputs reduce manual review time.
- +Governed calculation rules reduce inconsistent energy and carbon math across sites
- +Structured ingestion supports repeatable data loads for portfolio reporting workflows
- +Automation around recurring runs reduces manual spreadsheet reconciliation
- +Strong mapping and reference data configuration supports enterprise reporting boundaries
- –Upfront configuration work is required to align mappings and calculation logic
- –Deep integrations can require systems knowledge to design data handoffs
- –Complex portfolio models can increase admin overhead for smaller teams
- –Reporting customization may depend on mastering Envizi configuration patterns
Sustainability and ESG reporting teams
Standardize portfolio emissions outputs
Fewer manual reconciliation cycles
Energy managers at utilities-adjacent enterprises
Automate interval data processing
Faster monthly reporting turnaround
Show 2 more scenarios
Facilities and asset data teams
Map consumption to assets and sites
More reliable portfolio visibility
Configured mappings connect operational entities to consumption sources for consistent rollups.
Enterprise BI and data governance teams
Control definitions across systems
Aligned metrics across departments
Envizi configuration centralizes business rules so downstream reporting uses the same governed logic.
Best for: Fits when enterprise energy teams need governed calculations and repeatable reporting across many sites.
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager
enterpriseENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager benchmarks building energy and water consumption.
ENERGY STAR benchmarking calculations tie energy totals to EUI and standardized reporting outputs.
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager provides a built-in benchmarking model that organizes performance by account, property, and reporting year. It supports importing or entering energy data and tracking calculated indicators over time, which is useful for program reporting and internal trend reviews. It also supports emissions-related fields aligned to common reporting approaches, so energy and carbon metrics can be kept in one place.
The main tradeoff is that Portfolio Manager is oriented around benchmarking and reporting rather than advanced interval analytics or forecasting engines. It fits best when a team needs consistent performance measurement across many buildings and wants a repeatable workflow for collecting utility data and producing standardized outputs. A typical usage situation is managing an annual portfolio submission where multiple sites must be updated with energy totals and calculated indicators.
- +Benchmark-first data structure keeps asset metrics comparable across portfolios
- +Built-in EUI and reporting calculations reduce manual spreadsheet work
- +Portfolio management supports multi-building tracking in one workflow
- +Standardized fields support recurring program submissions
- –Interval-data analytics and load modeling depth are limited
- –Complex imports require careful mapping of property and utility inputs
Facilities reporting teams
Annual portfolio benchmarking updates
Repeatable annual submissions
Sustainability managers
Track energy and emissions metrics
Fewer disconnected spreadsheets
Show 1 more scenario
Property portfolio analysts
Compare performance across sites
Clear cross-site comparisons
Analysts use the property structure and calculated indicators to compare EUI trends across buildings.
Best for: Fits when consistent benchmarking and portfolio reporting across many buildings matter most.
GridPoint
vertical specialistGridPoint combines building controls, energy monitoring, and operational analytics for commercial sites.
Tariff-aware time-series cost views tied to interval meter signals for portfolio cost and load performance tracking.
GridPoint centers energy consumption management on interval-meter data ingestion and portfolio-level analytics tied to facilities and accounts. The system supports tariff-aware calculations for cost and load views, and it can automate workflows around exceptions and review cycles.
- +Interval-data centric workflows reduce manual normalization work
- +Tariff-aware cost modeling supports time-based reporting
- +Portfolio structure supports multi-site rollups and comparisons
- +Governance controls include RBAC and administrative traceability
- –Meter onboarding requires disciplined configuration and mapping
- –Deep customization of models can increase admin effort
- –Some integrations depend on utility and feed availability
- –Complex portfolios may need ongoing data quality review
Best for: Fits when multi-site operators need interval-focused analytics with governance for managed utility data.
Energy Elephant
SMBEnergy Elephant collects utility data and supports energy, carbon, and sustainability management.
Recurring import and reporting workflows that keep tariff-applied cost outputs synchronized with interval meter updates.
Energy Elephant is energy consumption software that ingests interval meter data and utility billing records to produce usage analytics and cost views. It supports automated workflows for recurring data refresh, tariff and rate schedule mapping, and reporting by building, meter, or account.
- +Automated refresh workflows reduce manual interval and bill rework.
- +Clear configuration for tariff and rate schedule mapping to meters.
- +Report outputs stay organized by building, meter, and account.
- +Exports support downstream analysis and audit-style documentation.
- –Interval data preparation and schema alignment can require setup discipline.
- –Advanced modeling depth for weather normalization varies by dataset quality.
Best for: Fits when teams need recurring utility data refresh, tariff mapping, and interval-based reporting with controlled configuration access.
UtilityAPI
API-firstUtilityAPI connects applications to customer-authorized utility interval and billing data.
Entity mapping for accounts and meters exposed through utility data API endpoints for downstream automation.
UtilityAPI targets teams that need an API-first utility data pipeline instead of manual bill-to-spreadsheet work. It focuses on collecting and normalizing utility and meter inputs so downstream workflows can calculate energy use over time, align it to billing periods, and support analytics.
- +API-first ingestion and normalized outputs for automated energy workflows
- +Account and meter mapping reduces manual reconciliation across sources
- +Programmatic access supports high-throughput processing and reuse
- +Integration-oriented configuration supports custom downstream analytics
- –Workflow coverage for tariff modeling and reporting is not its focus
- –Requires careful setup of source mappings to avoid entity misalignment
- –Less suited for teams needing built-in modeling UI for analysts
- –Automation depth increases integration and monitoring responsibilities
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need utility bill and meter ingestion through an API for automated energy analysis.
Arcadia
API-firstArcadia provides utility data access and energy intelligence through software and APIs.
Interval-meter centric consumption workflows that keep reporting and analytics aligned to account and building context.
Arcadia focuses on energy consumption management workflows tied to utility and building data, with emphasis on interval-meter visibility and account-ready reporting. The core capabilities center on ingesting meter and usage signals, normalizing and analyzing consumption over time, and turning those results into actionable performance and cost insights.
- +Interval meter reporting workflow is built around continuous usage timelines.
- +Automated ingestion reduces manual CSV rework for recurring analyses.
- +Multi-user governance supports team workflows with controlled access.
- +Consumption analytics connect directly to reporting outputs for programs.
- –Integration depth varies by utility data source and meter data availability.
- –Complex configuration increases setup time for multi-building programs.
- –Less suited for highly custom M&V baselines without established templates.
- –Automation controls depend on the quality of upstream meter metadata.
Best for: Fits when mid-size organizations need ongoing interval-based usage analysis with governed user workflows.
Smappee
SMBSmappee monitors electricity consumption and supports energy optimization for buildings and businesses.
Circuit-level monitoring with dashboard analytics built directly on Smappee meter readings and device pairing.
Smappee combines energy monitoring hardware with software that turns interval-level signals into per-site dashboards and analytics. The system focuses on data capture from Smappee meters and device pairing, then applies rules for consumption tracking, load visibility, and usage reporting across monitored circuits.
- +Interval-level insights derived from Smappee meter data
- +Clear dashboards for site and circuit level consumption tracking
- +Utility bill import supports reconciliation against monitored usage
- +Device pairing and configuration flow reduces manual data wrangling
- –Utility data and AMI alignment depend on importing rather than universal connectors
- –Extensibility is narrower than general-purpose EMS suites
- –Advanced modeling workflows are less comprehensive than dedicated analytics tools
- –Reporting setup requires careful mapping of monitored assets
Best for: Fits when facilities need circuit level monitoring with dashboards and bill reconciliation, using Smappee meters as the source.
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor
enterpriseResource Advisor tracks energy, carbon, utility, and sustainability performance across operations.
Meter hierarchy mapping that ties imported interval usage to site structure for consistent reporting across periods.
Schneider Electric Resource Advisor is an energy consumption management application that ingests interval meter data and links usage to meter hierarchy for reporting. It supports automated workflows for importing utility reads and normalizing the timeline so consumption views stay consistent across reporting periods.
- +Interval meter imports mapped to a configurable meter hierarchy
- +Automated workflows reduce manual cleanup of recurring utility reads
- +Load profile analytics for peak patterns and consumption trends
- +Energy use intensity outputs for cross-site performance comparisons
- –API-based automation depends on the available integration connectors
- –Data source configuration requires governance to avoid mis-mapped meters
- –Advanced tariff modeling capabilities are not as broad as specialist bill platforms
- –Works best when meter structure is defined before scaling to many sites
Best for: Fits when utilities data needs repeatable imports and consistent meter mapping for reporting and EUI tracking.
Sensorfact
vertical specialistSensorfact monitors industrial energy consumption and equipment performance with connected sensors.
Rule-driven handling of meter ingestion that ties consumption analytics to operational context within the monitoring workflow.
Sensorfact targets teams that need energy monitoring workflows tied to site activity data, not just basic reporting. The solution centers on meter data ingestion and normalization, then adds tracking and analytics that connect consumption to operational context.
- +Workflow-oriented handling of meter readings for recurring review cycles
- +Configuration-driven ingestion supports repeatable site onboarding
- +Analytics focus on connecting consumption patterns to operational context
- +Time-window comparisons support operational follow-up after data refreshes
- –Limited visibility into advanced automation primitives for complex transformations
- –Integration depth outside core ingestion and reporting is not consistently detailed
- –Governance controls like fine-grained RBAC and audit logging are not clearly specified
- –Custom data mapping effort can rise when meter structures differ widely
Best for: Fits when operations teams need repeatable consumption review workflows across multiple sites.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 energy consumption software, EnergyCAP stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Energy Consumption Software
Energy consumption software consolidates interval meter signals, utility bill data, and portfolio reporting logic into repeatable workflows for multi-site teams. This guide covers EnergyCAP, IBM Envizi, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, GridPoint, Energy Elephant, UtilityAPI, Arcadia, Smappee, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor, and Sensorfact.
After reviewing each tool’s ingestion, calculation, and reporting mechanics, the comparison focuses on how teams turn raw meter history into governed outputs like savings claims, EUI trends, and tariff-aware cost views. The tools differ most in how they handle baseline and adjustment logic, how rule configuration is governed, and how automation surfaces support external systems.
Energy Consumption Software that turns interval meter data into governed reporting and cost models
Energy consumption software imports interval meter data and utility-related reference information, then calculates energy use, time-based costs, and standardized reporting outputs for portfolios or individual sites. EnergyCAP anchors savings reporting with an M&V workflow that ties baseline logic and adjustment handling to meter history.
IBM Envizi focuses on governed rule-driven energy and emissions calculations tied to enterprise reporting boundaries and reference data management. Tools in this category also vary by how interval-based workflows are structured, how tariff mapping is configured, and how API-first ingestion or integration connectors support automated energy analysis across many accounts and meters.
Energy data ingestion, governed calculation, and external automation controls
Energy consumption software only becomes reusable when interval meter signals and utility reference inputs land in a consistent internal representation and then flow through the same calculations every time.
This category separates teams that can automate reporting and savings claims from teams that stay stuck on manual normalization. The best fit depends on how each tool handles interval history, tariff-aware cost modeling, and the governance of calculation rules.
M&V anchored baseline and adjustment events
EnergyCAP ties savings reporting to baseline logic and adjustment handling using measurement and verification workflows tied to meter history. This differs from approaches that focus on benchmarking structure, like ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, where EUI and standardized outputs drive the model more than baseline-event traceability.
Rule-driven calculation governance for enterprise reporting boundaries
IBM Envizi uses governed calculation rules tied to enterprise reporting boundaries and reference data management to reduce inconsistent energy and carbon math across sites. GridPoint focuses more on tariff-aware time-series cost views tied to interval meter signals than on governed calculation configuration depth.
Portfolio benchmarking structure built around EUI and standardized reporting outputs
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager builds its data structure around benchmarking calculations that produce EUI-centric reporting outputs. EnergyCAP can align savings claims to baseline and adjustment logic, which becomes a better fit when reporting must reflect M&V mechanics beyond benchmarking.
API-first ingestion and entity mapping for automated energy workflows
UtilityAPI is centered on utility data API endpoints that expose account and meter entity mappings to downstream automation. Schneider Electric Resource Advisor also supports automated workflows for interval imports, but its automation depends more on meter hierarchy mapping and configured connectors than an API-first ingestion focus.
Tariff-aware cost modeling synchronized to interval updates
Energy Elephant runs recurring import and reporting workflows that keep tariff-applied cost outputs synchronized with interval meter updates. GridPoint also emphasizes tariff-aware cost views, but Energy Elephant’s recurring refresh workflow and controlled configuration access address the repeat-update operational need more directly.
Interval-meter centric consumption workflows with continuous timeline alignment
Arcadia organizes interval-meter reporting around continuous usage timelines so analytics stay aligned to account and building context. Sensorfact uses workflow-oriented handling of meter readings for recurring review cycles, which improves review repeatability but provides thinner automation primitives for complex transformations.
Choose based on how governance, interval history, and automation primitives fit the reporting workflow
The decision hinges on whether the reporting workflow needs baseline-event traceability, governed calculation rule consistency, or API-level ingestion and automation.
Tools also differ in where configuration effort lands. Some concentrate configuration in tariff and mapping layers, while others require up-front alignment of calculation logic and enterprise reporting boundaries.
Start with the reporting claim type and baseline expectations
If savings reporting must reflect baseline logic and adjustment events tied to metering history, EnergyCAP is built around measurement and verification workflows. If the primary requirement is consistent EUI benchmarking outputs across assets, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager matches that benchmarking-first data structure more closely.
Pick the governance model for energy and carbon math
If a centralized team must enforce governed calculation rules across many sites, IBM Envizi’s rule-driven configuration tied to enterprise reporting boundaries fits the governance goal. If the priority is interval-focused cost and load performance reporting, GridPoint’s tariff-aware time-series cost views shift the governance emphasis toward time-based modeling rather than rule configuration depth.
Decide whether automation needs API-first ingestion or governed import workflows
If engineering needs utility data ingestion through an API with normalized outputs and account and meter mapping endpoints, UtilityAPI fits the automation requirement. If the workflow is centered on recurring imports with configurable mappings and hierarchical structure, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor focuses more on meter hierarchy mapping and automated cleanup than on API-first ingestion.
Match tariff mapping complexity to the team’s configuration bandwidth
If tariff mapping and rate schedule alignment must run on recurring intervals with controlled configuration access, Energy Elephant’s workflow-based refresh and tariff mapping to meters targets that operational pattern. If onboarding requires disciplined configuration for meter onboarding and model customization effort, GridPoint’s meter onboarding and deep customization trade-off becomes the heavier governance burden.
Select the interval timeline model that fits the analysis style
If analytics and reporting must stay attached to continuous usage timelines across buildings, Arcadia’s interval-meter centric reporting workflow supports that timeline alignment. If circuit-level visibility is needed from Smappee meter readings with device pairing and dashboards, Smappee targets that device-to-dashboard workflow rather than portfolio-level governance calculations.
Teams that need governed interval-to-reporting pipelines across many sites
Energy consumption software fits teams that run recurring interval analytics or utility bill reporting where the same rules must produce the same outputs across accounts.
The best fit depends on whether the team needs disciplined M&V baseline-event traceability, enterprise rule governance, or automation through API surfaces.
Facilities and energy managers running portfolio reporting plus M&V for savings claims
EnergyCAP supports disciplined measurement and verification workflows that anchor savings reporting to baseline logic and adjustment handling tied to metering history across many sites.
Enterprise energy and sustainability teams enforcing consistent energy and emissions calculations
IBM Envizi uses governed calculation rules tied to enterprise reporting boundaries and reference data management to keep energy and carbon math consistent across portfolios.
Engineering teams that need interval and utility data ingestion through automation surfaces
UtilityAPI provides API-first ingestion with entity mapping for accounts and meters so downstream energy analysis can run without manual reconciliation.
Operators focused on interval cost and load performance for multi-site utilities workflows
GridPoint emphasizes tariff-aware time-series cost views tied to interval meter signals with governance for managed utility data, while energy Elephant adds recurring refresh workflows tied to tariff-applied cost outputs.
Program teams standardizing benchmarking across buildings using EUI outputs
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager concentrates on benchmarking calculations that tie energy totals to EUI and produce standardized reporting outputs with a benchmark-first structure.
Common implementation pitfalls that create inconsistent energy outputs
Energy consumption software projects fail when mapping and governance are treated as one-time imports instead of repeatable configuration layers.
These pitfalls show up as mismatched meters, slow onboarding for new meter types, or reporting that cannot explain savings changes against baseline logic.
Using portfolio rollups without enforcing baseline-event handling for savings reporting
EnergyCAP’s M&V workflow is designed to keep savings reporting anchored to baseline logic and adjustment events tied to meter history. Tools focused on benchmarking or reporting outputs, like ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, can leave interval analytics or load modeling depth limited for baseline-event traceability.
Treating calculation-rule configuration as a one-time spreadsheet alignment
IBM Envizi requires upfront configuration work to align mappings and calculation logic, which becomes necessary to keep governed energy and emissions math consistent across sites. GridPoint can shift the effort into tariff-aware time-series modeling and meter onboarding configuration, so governance discipline must match the configuration surface the tool emphasizes.
Assuming tariff modeling workflows are equally mature across all tools
Energy Elephant synchronizes tariff-applied cost outputs with interval meter updates via recurring import and reporting workflows. Energy consumption tools that prioritize other workflows, like UtilityAPI’s API-first ingestion, do not focus on tariff modeling and reporting workflow depth, which forces extra downstream work.
Overloading interval schema alignment without planning for recurring refresh cadence
Arcadia reduces recurring CSV rework through automated ingestion, but complex configuration across multi-building programs can still increase setup time. EnergyCAP’s tariff and mapping complexity can slow onboarding for new meter types, so schema alignment planning should cover new metering scenarios as well as initial onboarding.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated EnergyCAP, IBM Envizi, ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, GridPoint, Energy Elephant, UtilityAPI, Arcadia, Smappee, Schneider Electric Resource Advisor, and Sensorfact using features coverage, ease of use, and value for interval-to-reporting workflows. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking, while ease and value each accounted for 30%.
EnergyCAP ranked highest because measurement and verification workflow mechanics tie baseline logic and adjustment handling to metering history, which makes savings reporting more traceable than interval-only reporting models. We also weighted how each product handles recurring imports, tariff-aware cost views, and automation or API surfaces because these determine whether interval updates translate into governed outputs without manual rework.
Frequently Asked Questions About Energy Consumption Software
Which tools in the lineup support an API-first workflow for interval and utility data ingestion?
How does energy consumption software preserve auditability for configuration and data changes across multi-site deployments?
When should a team choose a benchmarking workflow like ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager over interval-focused analytics?
What breaks if meter hierarchy mapping is missing when importing interval data into Schneider Electric Resource Advisor?
Which tools handle measurement and verification anchored to baseline logic tied to metering history?
How do recurring imports and scheduled refresh differ between Energy Elephant and Arcadia?
Which tools provide circuit-level monitoring context through device pairing rather than only portfolio aggregation?
What tradeoff occurs when choosing tariff-aware cost modeling, as in GridPoint, versus focusing on standardized benchmarking workflows?
How should teams plan data migration from spreadsheets or legacy reporting systems when adopting EnergyCAP or Energy Elephant?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→