GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Business FinanceTop 10 Best Easy To Use Project Management Software of 2026
Discover the top 10 easy-to-use project management tools for seamless workflows.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
monday.com
Automations for status changes, assignments, and cross-field updates across boards
Built for teams needing visual workflow automation and reporting without custom code.
Asana
Timeline view with dependencies to coordinate tasks and see schedule impact.
Built for teams needing intuitive task management with timelines, automation, and capacity tracking.
ClickUp
Timeline view with dependencies for visual project planning and progress tracking
Built for teams needing flexible task views and automation for ongoing delivery.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table benchmarks easy-to-use project management software across tools such as monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Trello, and Notion. It highlights how each platform supports core workflows like task assignment, team collaboration, and status tracking so teams can match features to day-to-day use.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | monday.com Provides customizable project boards, timelines, automations, and team collaboration to plan and track work. | all-in-one | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 2 | Asana Manages tasks, projects, timelines, and team workflows with views that support planning, execution, and reporting. | task-workflow | 8.2/10 | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 3 | ClickUp Runs projects with tasks, documents, goals, and reporting across multiple customizable views. | flexible-workspace | 8.3/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| 4 | Trello Organizes work into Kanban boards with cards, checklists, labels, and simple automation for quick setup. | kanban | 7.7/10 | 7.3/10 | 9.0/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 5 | Notion Tracks projects with databases, task views, and collaborative documentation in a single workspace. | workspace-database | 7.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 6 | Smartsheet Plans and tracks projects using spreadsheet-like grids, templates, dashboards, and collaboration features. | spreadsheet-style | 7.8/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 7 | Wrike Coordinates work with customizable request intake, task management, and progress reporting for teams. | work-management | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 8 | Linear Manages software-style projects with issue tracking, streamlined planning, and team collaboration for delivery. | issue-tracking | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 9 | Jira Software Tracks and plans complex work using customizable issue types, agile boards, and reporting for delivery teams. | agile-issue-tracking | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 10 | Basecamp Runs projects through a small set of organized tools for messages, schedules, documents, and task lists. | simple-team | 7.6/10 | 7.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 6.9/10 |
Provides customizable project boards, timelines, automations, and team collaboration to plan and track work.
Manages tasks, projects, timelines, and team workflows with views that support planning, execution, and reporting.
Runs projects with tasks, documents, goals, and reporting across multiple customizable views.
Organizes work into Kanban boards with cards, checklists, labels, and simple automation for quick setup.
Tracks projects with databases, task views, and collaborative documentation in a single workspace.
Plans and tracks projects using spreadsheet-like grids, templates, dashboards, and collaboration features.
Coordinates work with customizable request intake, task management, and progress reporting for teams.
Manages software-style projects with issue tracking, streamlined planning, and team collaboration for delivery.
Tracks and plans complex work using customizable issue types, agile boards, and reporting for delivery teams.
Runs projects through a small set of organized tools for messages, schedules, documents, and task lists.
monday.com
all-in-oneProvides customizable project boards, timelines, automations, and team collaboration to plan and track work.
Automations for status changes, assignments, and cross-field updates across boards
monday.com stands out for visual, configurable work management using boards, views, and drag-and-drop updates. Teams can plan work with timelines, manage dependencies with automations, and coordinate execution across statuses and owners. Reporting dashboards track progress from multiple perspectives such as workload, timeline health, and custom metrics. Integrations connect task workflows to communication and data sources without rebuilding processes.
Pros
- Highly configurable boards with many field types and reusable templates
- Timeline view and automations keep plans aligned with real execution
- Dashboards summarize work status, workload, and custom metrics quickly
Cons
- Complex workflows can become harder to maintain across many automations
- Advanced reporting needs careful board design to avoid misleading metrics
- Large boards with heavy activity can feel slower during high-volume updates
Best For
Teams needing visual workflow automation and reporting without custom code
More related reading
Asana
task-workflowManages tasks, projects, timelines, and team workflows with views that support planning, execution, and reporting.
Timeline view with dependencies to coordinate tasks and see schedule impact.
Asana stands out with a clean task-and-timeline experience that keeps work visible across teams. It supports projects, task assignments, due dates, recurring tasks, and approval-style workflows to structure execution. Views like lists, boards, timelines, and calendars make it easy to switch between planning and tracking without rebuilding the model. Built-in reporting and workload views help managers spot bottlenecks and manage capacity as tasks move.
Pros
- Multiple project views including timeline and board for instant planning changes
- Robust task dependencies and recurring tasks for repeatable delivery schedules
- Workload and reporting surfaces help managers track capacity and progress quickly
- Automation rules reduce manual updates across assignments and status changes
- Solid mobile experience keeps updates and comments usable on the go
Cons
- Complex portfolio-style reporting can feel harder than task-level tracking
- Advanced governance needs more setup for large programs with many teams
- Reporting and automation can require workarounds for highly custom workflows
Best For
Teams needing intuitive task management with timelines, automation, and capacity tracking
ClickUp
flexible-workspaceRuns projects with tasks, documents, goals, and reporting across multiple customizable views.
Timeline view with dependencies for visual project planning and progress tracking
ClickUp stands out with highly customizable workspaces that let teams build task views, workflows, and reporting around their process. It centralizes execution with tasks, subtasks, dependencies, statuses, assignees, comments, and file attachments. Teams can switch between list, board, calendar, timeline, and dashboard views while keeping updates and activity logs in one place. Automation features and built-in templates help standardize recurring workflows without heavy setup.
Pros
- Multiple native views like Board, Calendar, Timeline, and Dashboards
- Powerful task structure with subtasks, custom fields, and dependencies
- Workflow automation reduces manual status updates and routing
- Centralized activity feed improves accountability during execution
- Templates speed up initial setup for common team processes
Cons
- Deep customization can overwhelm teams during initial configuration
- Advanced reporting and dashboards require careful field modeling
- Large workspaces can feel slower if activity volume is high
Best For
Teams needing flexible task views and automation for ongoing delivery
More related reading
Trello
kanbanOrganizes work into Kanban boards with cards, checklists, labels, and simple automation for quick setup.
Butler automation for triggering rules that update, move, or create cards
Trello stands out with its Kanban boards that map tasks to columns so workflows stay visually readable. It supports drag-and-drop movement, due dates, labels, checklists, file attachments, and recurring card templates for repeatable processes. Built-in automation via Butler and collaborative features like comments and mentions help teams keep work moving without heavy setup. Views and board permissions support common project tracking patterns, but complex dependencies and advanced reporting stay limited compared with full project management suites.
Pros
- Kanban drag-and-drop makes task flow updates fast for any team
- Checklists, due dates, labels, and attachments cover everyday project tracking
- Butler automation reduces repetitive card and workflow actions
Cons
- Dependency management and critical-path style planning are not strong
- Reporting and metrics for complex programs are comparatively basic
- Large multi-team boards can become cluttered without disciplined structure
Best For
Small teams managing visual workflows and lightweight projects
Notion
workspace-databaseTracks projects with databases, task views, and collaborative documentation in a single workspace.
Databases with kanban and timeline views for task and roadmap management
Notion stands out for turning project management into a customizable wiki where tasks, docs, and dashboards live together. It supports databases for tasks and roadmaps, plus kanban boards, timeline views, and recurring workflows through templates. Team coordination benefits from comments, mentions, and permissions across spaces and pages. Lightweight automation appears through built-in integrations and workflow tools, but it is not a dedicated project execution suite.
Pros
- Databases power flexible task models without rigid field constraints
- Kanban and timeline views cover common planning styles
- Templates and page links make project setup fast and repeatable
- Comments and mentions keep decisions attached to work artifacts
Cons
- Advanced reporting needs manual dashboard building
- Dependency and resource planning features remain limited for complex projects
- Automations are more workflow support than full project execution
Best For
Teams needing wiki-centric project tracking with flexible task databases
Smartsheet
spreadsheet-stylePlans and tracks projects using spreadsheet-like grids, templates, dashboards, and collaboration features.
Smartsheet Automations for rule-based approvals and status updates across projects
Smartsheet stands out for turning spreadsheets into collaborative project workspaces with structured views. Core tools include task tracking with grid, calendar, and Gantt-style planning, plus workflows like approvals and automated status updates. Reports and dashboards connect live sheet data to progress metrics, while integrations and automation help coordinate work across teams. It is easy to get running with templates and a familiar interface that still supports real project management.
Pros
- Spreadsheet-based UI makes project tracking familiar and fast to adopt
- Gantt views and calendar scheduling support multiple planning styles
- Automated workflows drive approvals, reminders, and status synchronization
- Dashboards and reports summarize progress across many sheets
- Permissions and sharing controls handle cross-team collaboration
Cons
- Smaller teams can feel workflow-heavy compared with simple task boards
- Complex dependency mapping can be less straightforward than dedicated PM tools
- Navigation between views can slow down large, deeply nested workspaces
Best For
Teams managing work in spreadsheets with automation and reporting
More related reading
Wrike
work-managementCoordinates work with customizable request intake, task management, and progress reporting for teams.
Wrike Automation Rules
Wrike stands out for its flexible work management across projects, tasks, and requests with configurable workflows. It combines visual planning views, task dependencies, and robust reporting to support execution and tracking from intake to delivery. Automation rules and recurring work help teams reduce manual status updates while keeping processes consistent. Collaboration tools like comments, approvals, and document sharing keep work anchored to the same items that drive the plan.
Pros
- Configurable workflows for projects, requests, and intake without rebuilding processes
- Strong dependency handling supports realistic timelines and execution tracking
- Automation rules reduce manual updates and standardize recurring work
- Reporting and dashboards provide actionable visibility without heavy setup
- Collaboration stays attached to tasks through comments and approvals
Cons
- Advanced configuration can feel complex for teams needing simple task boards
- Setup of dependencies and custom fields can slow initial rollout
- Some reporting views require careful configuration to match workflows
Best For
Teams running cross-functional projects that need workflow automation and reporting
Linear
issue-trackingManages software-style projects with issue tracking, streamlined planning, and team collaboration for delivery.
Linear automations that trigger actions on issue events to streamline workflows
Linear stands out for its fast, keyboard-first issue tracking that turns work into a simple stream of tickets and updates. It supports boards, issue states, labels, and milestones, plus sprint-style workflows that keep teams aligned on priorities. Built-in automations connect events to workflows, while integrations pull in information from Git and other common developer tools. Collaboration is handled through comments, mentions, and notifications that are designed to reduce setup friction during daily execution.
Pros
- Keyboard-first issue creation makes daily planning and updates quick
- Roadmap and issue states keep execution aligned without heavy configuration
- Automation reduces repetitive triage and status changes across projects
- Git integrations link commits and pull requests to issue work
- Clear notification model supports focused collaboration across teams
Cons
- Project management depth can feel thin for non-software workflows
- Advanced reporting options are limited compared with full PM suites
- Complex dependency modeling requires extra process discipline
Best For
Software teams needing lightweight, visual workflow management with strong issue tracking
More related reading
Jira Software
agile-issue-trackingTracks and plans complex work using customizable issue types, agile boards, and reporting for delivery teams.
Workflow Designer with rule-based transitions, conditions, and validators
Jira Software stands out with configurable issue types and workflow rules that let teams model work exactly how they deliver. It provides core project management building blocks like boards, backlog planning, and sprint execution backed by strong search and reporting. Atlassian integration with other products supports collaborative development workflows across teams. Setup can be straightforward for basic tracking, while deeper customization and governance add complexity.
Pros
- Highly configurable workflows and issue types for tailored delivery processes
- Scrum and Kanban boards support sprint planning and continuous flow tracking
- Powerful Jira query search enables precise reporting across projects
Cons
- Workflow configuration and permissions require admin discipline to avoid friction
- Reporting can become complex when custom fields and automation grow
Best For
Teams managing software delivery with customizable workflows and agile execution
Basecamp
simple-teamRuns projects through a small set of organized tools for messages, schedules, documents, and task lists.
Message Boards for project discussions tied to shared workspaces
Basecamp stands out for its simple, conversation-first project organization that keeps plans and decisions visible in one place. It delivers message boards, to-dos, scheduling via calendar, file sharing, and lightweight reporting that support day-to-day execution. Project managers get straightforward workflows for checklists and recurring work without complex configuration. Coordination stays centralized across teams with fewer moving parts than many feature-heavy project suites.
Pros
- Message boards keep project context and decisions in one readable thread
- To-dos, checklists, and reminders support practical execution without heavy setup
- Centralized files, links, and calendar reduce task switching across tools
Cons
- Limited automation and workflow customization compared with advanced task platforms
- Reporting stays lightweight for teams needing deep analytics and dashboards
- Structure can feel rigid for projects that require complex dependencies
Best For
Small teams managing straightforward projects with clear communication and simple task tracking
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 business finance, monday.com stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Easy To Use Project Management Software
This buyer’s guide explains what to look for in easy-to-use project management software and how to match tool behavior to real team workflows. It covers monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Trello, Notion, Smartsheet, Wrike, Linear, Jira Software, and Basecamp with specific feature-to-work mapping. It also highlights common setup mistakes that make these tools feel harder than they need to be.
What Is Easy To Use Project Management Software?
Easy to use project management software helps teams plan work, move tasks through states, and keep collaboration attached to the work item without heavy process engineering. These tools reduce coordination friction by offering visual views, fast updates, and workflow automation that updates statuses, assignees, or related fields when something changes. Teams use them to replace scattered spreadsheets, chat-only coordination, and manual status chasing. Tools like Trello and Basecamp emphasize quick, visual, and conversation-centered execution, while monday.com and Asana emphasize structured planning with timelines and dashboards.
Key Features to Look For
Ease of use comes from features that keep planning, execution, and status visibility aligned with minimal manual rework.
Visual planning views with fast updates
Look for timeline, board, and calendar-style views that let teams change plans and see execution impact without rebuilding the model. Asana’s timeline view with dependencies and ClickUp’s timeline view with dependencies support schedule-aware planning in a format teams can interpret quickly.
Workflow automation that updates real work state
Choose automation that triggers on concrete events like status changes and assignments so work stays consistent across views. monday.com automations update status changes, assignments, and cross-field values across boards, while Wrike Automation Rules standardize recurring execution from intake to delivery.
Dependencies for schedule impact and realistic sequencing
For teams that need sequencing, dependencies must be more than labels. Asana and ClickUp both include dependencies tied to timeline planning, and Wrike supports dependency handling for realistic timeline tracking.
Task data that stays centralized during execution
Easy tools keep comments, attachments, and activity history attached to the same execution object so teams do not hunt across systems. ClickUp centralizes tasks, comments, and attachments in one place, and Wrike keeps collaboration through comments, approvals, and document sharing attached to the work item.
Reporting dashboards that reflect actual workflow states
Select reporting that summarizes progress from the fields the team already uses. monday.com dashboards summarize workload, timeline health, and custom metrics quickly, while Wrike dashboards provide actionable visibility without requiring heavy setup.
Templates and configurable workflow structure
Use templates and repeatable workflow building blocks to reduce setup time for recurring work. Trello recurring card templates and Butler automation help standardize lightweight processes, while ClickUp templates speed up initial setup for common team processes.
How to Choose the Right Easy To Use Project Management Software
Pick the tool that matches how work is updated and coordinated each day, then validate that the tool’s structure supports that pattern.
Map the team’s work movement to the available views
If work requires timeline planning with schedule-aware coordination, compare Asana and ClickUp because both provide timeline views with dependencies that show schedule impact. If work is primarily flow-based with simple movement through stages, Trello’s Kanban drag-and-drop updates make day-to-day status changes fast.
Choose automation that reduces manual status work
If the team loses time to copying status and assignments across fields, monday.com’s automations for status changes, assignments, and cross-field updates keep boards aligned to execution. For teams that run intake to delivery processes, Wrike Automation Rules reduce manual updates by standardizing recurring work across configurable workflows.
Verify dependency handling matches real project sequencing
For projects where sequencing matters, prioritize tools with dependencies tied to timeline planning, like Asana and ClickUp. For organizations using structured request-to-delivery work, Wrike’s dependency handling supports realistic execution tracking without building a separate planning spreadsheet.
Confirm collaboration artifacts attach to the right execution objects
When decisions and documents must stay with the work item, select tools that anchor collaboration to tasks. ClickUp keeps comments and file attachments with tasks, while Wrike attaches collaboration through comments, approvals, and document sharing to the item driving the plan.
Check whether reporting is easy to keep truthful
If dashboard metrics must reflect accurate state fields, monday.com’s dashboards summarize workload, timeline health, and custom metrics from board data. If reporting needs are lighter and mainly operational, Basecamp provides lightweight reporting tied to message boards, to-dos, and schedules instead of deep analytics that require careful data modeling.
Who Needs Easy To Use Project Management Software?
Easy-to-use project management tools fit distinct execution styles, from visual task flow to software issue tracking and wiki-centric planning.
Teams needing visual workflow automation and reporting without custom code
monday.com fits teams that want configurable project boards plus automations for status changes, assignments, and cross-field updates across boards. Reporting dashboards in monday.com help managers summarize workload and timeline health from board and field data.
Teams needing intuitive task management with timelines, automation, and capacity tracking
Asana suits teams that plan and execute with timelines because the timeline view supports dependencies that coordinate tasks and show schedule impact. Workload and reporting views in Asana help spot bottlenecks and manage capacity as tasks move.
Teams needing flexible task views and automation for ongoing delivery
ClickUp is a fit for teams that want multiple native views like Board, Calendar, Timeline, and Dashboards while keeping execution updates and activity logs centralized. ClickUp automations and templates support standardizing recurring delivery workflows.
Small teams managing visual workflows and lightweight projects
Trello works well when a Kanban board with drag-and-drop movement matches day-to-day work. Butler automation helps trigger repetitive actions like updating, moving, or creating cards, which keeps workflow simple without complex dependency planning.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several recurring setup and usage patterns make these platforms feel harder than they need to be.
Building complex automations without a stable workflow model
monday.com can become harder to maintain when many automations interact across boards, especially when cross-field updates are too broad. Wrike Automation Rules are powerful, but advanced configuration can feel complex for teams that only need simple task boards.
Assuming dependencies exist without verifying schedule impact behavior
Tools like Trello are strong for Kanban flow, but dependency management is comparatively limited for critical-path style planning. Asana and ClickUp provide dependencies tied to timeline planning, which helps prevent planners from making schedule decisions on incomplete dependency behavior.
Treating dashboards as “automatic truth” instead of modeling the right fields
monday.com advanced reporting works best when board design supports the metrics that managers need, since unclear field modeling can produce misleading dashboards. ClickUp dashboards and reporting also require careful field modeling to reflect the team’s actual statuses and progress measurements.
Overextending a wiki tool into full execution and reporting
Notion’s databases support flexible task models with kanban and timeline views, but dependency and resource planning features remain limited for complex projects. Teams needing execution depth and reliable scheduling should look at Asana, ClickUp, or Wrike instead of relying on database flexibility alone.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions that directly affect day-to-day adoption: features with weight 0.4, ease of use with weight 0.3, and value with weight 0.3. The overall rating for each product is the weighted average of those three sub-dimensions, using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. monday.com separated from lower-ranked tools by combining high configurability with practical ease mechanisms like automations for status changes, assignments, and cross-field updates across boards. That combination makes it easier to keep planning aligned with execution as teams update work through timeline and board views.
Frequently Asked Questions About Easy To Use Project Management Software
Which easy-to-use tool best fits teams that want visual status tracking without complex setup?
monday.com fits teams that want visual workflow control using boards, timeline planning, and drag-and-drop updates. Asana also emphasizes simple task-and-timeline visibility, while Trello keeps execution readable with Kanban columns and quick card movement.
What tool supports approvals and recurring workflows with minimal process engineering?
Smartsheet supports approval-style workflows and automated status updates tied to sheet data. Wrike and Asana also handle recurring work, with Wrike adding automation rules for status changes and Asana supporting recurring tasks and approval-style execution.
Which option is easiest for building a repeatable workflow model for ongoing delivery?
ClickUp supports customizable workspaces with built-in templates and automation features that standardize recurring delivery. Trello complements repeatability with recurring card templates, and Wrike helps maintain consistency using recurring work and automation rules.
Which tool is best for managing dependencies and seeing how schedule impact changes?
Asana includes a timeline view that supports dependencies so changes show schedule impact. monday.com also tracks cross-field work updates through automations, while ClickUp and Linear use dependency-aware timeline views for visual planning.
What platform works well when the project system must double as documentation and a knowledge base?
Notion is designed for project tracking as a wiki by combining task databases with docs and dashboards. Basecamp can also centralize decisions using message boards, but it stays focused on conversation-first organization rather than database-heavy planning.
Which software suits teams that prefer spreadsheet-style work management while still running real project workflows?
Smartsheet targets spreadsheet-driven teams by converting familiar grids into collaborative planning with calendar and Gantt-style views. It also layers approvals and status automation, while monday.com and Asana shift teams toward board or timeline models.
Which tool is most efficient for software teams that want keyboard-first issue tracking?
Linear fits software teams that need fast, keyboard-first ticket handling with issue states, labels, and milestones. Jira Software targets agile teams with configurable issue types and workflow rules, while ClickUp and Wrike support broader work management across functions.
Which option integrates cleanly with developer tools and supports automation triggered by events?
Linear integrates with Git and uses automations that react to issue events. Jira Software also supports Atlassian integrations for development collaboration, while monday.com connects workflows to communication and data sources so cross-tool activity updates stay tied to the same items.
What tool is best for cross-functional work intake through requests and delivery tracking?
Wrike supports workflows from intake to delivery using configurable task and request handling with reporting and dependency-aware planning. Asana manages cross-team execution through multiple views and workload tracking, while monday.com helps route execution across statuses and owners using automations.
Which platform is simplest to onboard for teams that want discussion plus lightweight task tracking in one place?
Basecamp provides message boards tied to shared workspaces, to-dos, scheduling via calendar, and file sharing with minimal configuration. Trello also stays quick to adopt with drag-and-drop Kanban boards, but it relies less on centralized conversation tied to the work items.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Business Finance alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of business finance tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare business finance tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.