GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Easy To Use Photo Editing Software of 2026
Top 10 best easy to use photo editing software options ranked for beginners, with side-by-side features and notes on Photoshop, Polarr, Capture One.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Adobe Photoshop is the safest pick for small teams and studios that need detailed retouching with reliable masking and print-ready exports, whereas Polarr fits better when small teams want repeatable, low-complexity edits with minimal setup overhead.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Adobe Photoshop
Content-Aware Fill with editable sampling lets complex object removal be refined without rebuilding the whole composition.
Built for fits when detailed retouching, masking, and print-ready exports matter for small teams and studios..
Polarr
Editor pickOne-click look presets with adjustable sliders that update on-demand across saved styles.
Built for fits when small teams need repeatable photo edits with minimal complexity overhead..
Capture One
Editor pickStyles plus variants let one edit logic apply across sets while preserving per-image adjustments.
Built for fits when RAW photographers need non-destructive consistency across batches..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Adobe Photoshop
enterpriseA professional image editor with layers, selections, retouching, compositing, and generative fill.
Content-Aware Fill with editable sampling lets complex object removal be refined without rebuilding the whole composition.
Photoshop provides a full layer stack for non-destructive editing, including adjustment layers and layer masks for reversible changes. Selection tools and object-removal features support background removal and cleanup workflows that can be refined iteratively. RAW development handles lens and perspective corrections, exposure and white-balance adjustments, and histogram-based tonal checks.
A tradeoff is that dense controls require workflow discipline to keep files organized and edits reversible across many layers and masks. It fits best when retouching requires pixel-level decisions, like product cutouts, complex compositing, or multi-step color corrections for print delivery.
- +Layer masks and adjustment layers keep edits reversible and controllable
- +RAW development supports lens and perspective correction with fine tonal control
- +Selection and object removal tools handle detailed background cleanup
- +Export options cover JPEG, PNG transparency, and TIFF print workflows
- –Large layer stacks can slow edits and increase file-management overhead
- –Automation and batch workflows require scripting or careful action setup
- –Color-managed output depends on consistently applying the right ICC profile
- –Advanced tools have a steep learning curve for repeatable results
Studio retouching teams
Remove objects and rebuild backgrounds
Faster revisions with fewer redraws
Product photo operators
Create cutouts for catalog listings
More consistent transparency outputs
Show 2 more scenarios
Wedding and event editors
Unify color and exposure across RAW sets
More uniform final galleries
Applies RAW development controls with histogram checks and targeted adjustments layers.
Print prepress production
Prepare ICC-managed exports for press
Fewer color shifts at output
Exports TIFF with color management and controlled sharpening for print deliverables.
Best for: Fits when detailed retouching, masking, and print-ready exports matter for small teams and studios.
More related reading
Polarr
consumerA web and mobile editor with presets, color adjustments, masks, retouching, and selective editing controls.
One-click look presets with adjustable sliders that update on-demand across saved styles.
Polarr’s editor is built around adjustment controls that update images without destructive overwrites, so revisiting earlier settings is straightforward. RAW file support enables exposure, white balance, and noise reduction adjustments before JPEG export or PNG transparency when a transparent background is needed. Preset creation and reuse helps maintain a consistent look across batches, which is a common need for product images and social content.
A tradeoff is that Polarr’s masking and layering depth is smaller than full pro editors that rely on multi-layer comps. It works best when edits stay within a single photo workflow such as correcting perspective, cleaning noise, and applying a consistent style, rather than building complex scenes from scratch.
- +Fast preset workflows for consistent batch edits
- +RAW development controls that cover exposure and white balance
- +PNG transparency export for graphic-style finishing
- +Non-destructive adjustments that are easy to revisit
- –Layer and mask complexity is less than pro compositor tools
- –Advanced selection workflows can feel limited for edge cases
- –Deep color management controls are not the editor’s focus
- –Batch pipelines lack fine-grained per-image automation controls
Social media marketers
Batch color correction for weekly posts
Lower editing time per post
Ecommerce photo editors
Transparent PNG export for product overlays
Faster campaign layout work
Show 2 more scenarios
Freelance photographers
RAW cleanup before sharing exports
Consistent delivery look
RAW adjustments handle exposure, white balance, noise reduction, and lens fixes.
Content ops teams
Repeatable style updates across batches
More uniform visual output
Saved edits and reusable looks reduce drift between creators and time periods.
Best for: Fits when small teams need repeatable photo edits with minimal complexity overhead.
Capture One
vertical specialistA photo workflow application for RAW processing, tethered capture, color grading, masking, and catalog management.
Styles plus variants let one edit logic apply across sets while preserving per-image adjustments.
Capture One delivers a dedicated RAW development workflow with precise tone and color controls, plus metadata preservation during editing and export. Editing can be non-destructive with adjustment layers and layer masks, which helps refine results without overwriting earlier decisions. File handling is built around catalogs and session-style organization, which makes it easier to move from capture to deliverables.
A tradeoff appears in the learning curve for its advanced organization tools like styles, variants, and tethering setups. Capture One fits best when a photographer needs consistent results across many similar RAW files and wants tight control of how edits transfer during batch processing.
- +Non-destructive adjustment layers and layer masks for reversible edits
- +Fast RAW development controls for exposure, white balance, and lens correction
- +Catalog and batch workflows for predictable multi-image delivery
- +Color management with ICC handling and export-focused output controls
- –Advanced organization tools require time to learn
- –Layer workflow can feel slower for quick one-off edits
- –Some niche retouch tasks need external plugins
- –Tethering setup depends on session and camera connection configuration
Wedding photographers
Edit large RAW sets consistently
Faster delivery with consistent color
Studio product teams
Batch refine backgrounds and details
More uniform product imagery
Show 2 more scenarios
Portrait editors
Iterate exposure and skin tone non-destructively
Easier revisions between client rounds
Layer masks keep local fixes isolated from global exposure changes.
Freelance editors
Return print-ready exports with controlled output
Reliable deliverables for print houses
Export settings target specific formats while keeping edits organized in catalogs.
Best for: Fits when RAW photographers need non-destructive consistency across batches.
Canva
SMBBrowser-based editing with templates, filters, retouching, background removal, and social export tools.
One-click background removal with automatic edge cleanup for product and portrait cutouts.
Canva combines photo editing with design layout in one cloud editor, which keeps common edits close to exporting share-ready visuals. Its drag-and-drop workflow supports cropping, filters, background removal, and basic retouching without a timeline or complex mask management.
Canva also includes templates for consistent sizing across social posts and marketing creatives, which reduces rework during iteration. Cloud sharing and collaboration make review cycles faster for teams that need edits tied to specific assets.
- +Background removal runs inside the editor for quick cutout results
- +Template-based canvas sizes reduce export back-and-forth for social formats
- +Cloud collaboration supports comments on assets during review
- +Editing controls like cropping and filters are simple and fast to apply
- –Layer masks and advanced non-destructive workflows are limited
- –RAW development controls and lens corrections are not as deep as dedicated editors
- –Batch processing for large folders is basic compared to pro tools
- –Color management and print-ready tuning can be shallow for critical output
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need fast, repeatable photo edits inside a broader design workflow.
Pixlr
consumerA browser and mobile photo editor with templates, one-click effects, background removal, and generative tools.
Adjustment layers with editable layer masks support reversible edits without destroying underlying pixels.
Pixlr lets users edit photos in a web browser with a layer-based workflow and direct painting tools for quick visual changes. Core capabilities include non-destructive adjustment layers, selection tools, and export to common formats like JPEG and PNG transparency.
The editor also supports RAW development for workflows that start from camera files. Pixlr prioritizes an approachable interface for common retouching tasks like background removal, object removal, and color corrections.
- +Layer-based editing with adjustment layers for reversible color changes
- +Fast selection and masking tools for clean cutouts and edge refinement
- +Export workflow supports JPEG and PNG transparency for web and graphics
- +RAW development tools cover common exposure and white-balance corrections
- –Advanced retouching tools cover key cases but lack deep compositing controls
- –Batch processing is limited for large multi-folder imports
- –Color management controls are basic for ICC workflow precision
- –Project organization for complex multi-layer jobs is less structured
Best for: Fits when teams need browser-based photo edits with layers, masks, and quick export for web deliverables.
Adobe Lightroom
vertical specialistA cloud-based photo editor with automatic organization, presets, masking, RAW adjustments, and synchronized libraries.
Masking and selective adjustments inside Lightroom keep edits editable after retouch and color changes.
Adobe Lightroom is a cloud-first photo editor that pairs non-destructive editing with a single catalog across desktop and mobile. It provides RAW development tools like exposure and white-balance adjustment plus guided guided retouching for common cleanup tasks.
Lightroom also supports lens and perspective corrections, then syncs edits to the library for consistent export. The overall workflow is built around organizing images, applying adjustments, and exporting JPEG files with metadata retained.
- +Non-destructive edits keep RAW changes reversible per adjustment
- +Mobile and desktop sync preserves edits and selections
- +Masking tools make targeted color and retouch adjustments practical
- +Batch exports support fast delivery for multiple image sets
- –Layer-masking depth is limited versus dedicated compositing tools
- –Some advanced retouch workflows require extra manual passes
- –Catalog and sync behavior can feel opaque during large imports
- –Round-trip TIFF and Photoshop workflows need careful handoffs
Best for: Fits when photographers want quick, repeatable RAW edits synced across devices.
BeFunky
consumerA browser photo editor with touch-up tools, effects, collage layouts, and graphic design templates.
Background removal with guided refinements for quick cutouts without moving into a dedicated compositor.
BeFunky pairs quick, guided editing with a large toolkit for common photo fixes. It focuses on an easy click-and-adjust workflow for effects, touch-ups, and background changes, then exports to standard image formats.
Tool choices are organized by task, so color tweaks, retouching, and graphics overlays land in predictable places. Editing is browser-based, so projects can be finished without switching between desktop and mobile apps.
- +Task-based editor layout reduces hunting for controls
- +Background removal and object touch-up tools cover frequent needs
- +Built-in effects and templates support fast style changes
- +Exports work for common print and web workflows
- –Non-destructive layer workflows are limited versus pro editors
- –Batch processing and workflow automation are not the core strength
- –RAW development controls lack the depth of dedicated RAW tools
- –Metadata preservation options are not as transparent as in pro software
Best for: Fits when quick edits for social, design mockups, and lightweight retouching matter more than deep RAW control.
Photopea
desktop alternativeA browser editor with layers, masks, filters, and support for PSD, XCF, Sketch, and common image formats.
PSD import and layered editing workflow inside a browser editor.
Photopea is a web-based, editor-style alternative to desktop image tools, built around a familiar Photoshop-like workspace. It supports a layer-based workflow with layer masks, selection tools, and adjustment layers for non-destructive edits.
Common formats like JPEG, PNG transparency, PSD import, and TIFF export cover everyday photo retouching and print-oriented deliverables. Export tools include format conversion and resizing for sharing-ready outputs.
- +Layer masks and adjustment layers support non-destructive retouching
- +Selection tools cover precise cutouts and targeted edits
- +PSD import keeps layered assets usable during revisions
- +PNG transparency export supports web-ready graphics
- –RAW development workflow is limited compared with dedicated editors
- –Complex color management needs manual attention
- –Large batch processing is not a first-class workflow
- –Browser-based performance can lag on very large documents
Best for: Fits when quick browser-based edits are needed on layered images.
Fotor
consumerA web and mobile editor for enhancement, portrait retouching, collages, templates, and AI image tasks.
One-tap background removal combined with easy layer placement for fast cutout compositions.
Fotor edits photos in a browser workflow with one-click tools for common fixes like exposure and color. Its editor centers on drag-and-drop controls, auto-enhancement options, and a guided set of filters and effects for fast results.
Layer-based work is available for composing elements with masks and text, while export supports standard image formats for sharing and print workflows. The tool also includes background removal and object cleanup features intended for quick polish rather than deep, manual retouching.
- +Browser editor reduces install friction for casual edits
- +Background removal works quickly for cutout-style edits
- +Layering and masking support compositing with text and elements
- +Auto-enhance and one-tap adjustments speed up baseline fixes
- –Non-destructive layer workflow depth is limited versus pro editors
- –RAW development controls are not as extensive as desktop RAW tools
- –Batch processing capabilities are basic for large catalogs
- –Precision selection tools feel less granular than advanced retouching suites
Best for: Fits when quick web-based edits, cutouts, and simple layering matter more than advanced retouching.
PhotoScape X
desktop alternativeA desktop editor with batch processing, collages, filters, screen capture, RAW conversion, and retouching tools.
Batch processing that applies repeatable edits across folders with minimal setup time.
PhotoScape X targets simple, fast photo edits on a desktop workflow with a UI designed around common tasks like cropping, retouching, and color adjustments. It supports RAW development for cameras that export RAW, plus one-shot JPEG export and PNG transparency for graphics-style edits.
Batch processing helps repeat the same edits across multiple images, and metadata handling stays in the editing flow rather than being an afterthought. The overall experience centers on guided, visible adjustments instead of deep layer systems or scripting.
- +Batch processing applies the same edits across many photos
- +RAW development supports direct exposure and white-balance adjustments
- +PNG export supports transparency for overlays and UI assets
- +Non-destructive preview style keeps edits easy to iterate
- –Layer-based workflows like masks are limited compared with editor-grade tools
- –Object removal and background removal are not as comprehensive
- –Color management controls are shallow for print-focused ICC workflows
- –No documented automation or API surface for integrations
Best for: Fits when quick desktop edits and batch repeats matter more than deep layer work.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 technology digital media, Adobe Photoshop stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right easy to use photo editing software
This guide covers easy-to-use photo editing tools that balance guided controls with real editing workflows across browser and desktop editors. Adobe Photoshop, Polarr, Capture One, Canva, Pixlr, Lightroom, BeFunky, Photopea, Fotor, and PhotoScape X are included.
The walkthrough focuses on what makes editing feel simple in practice and where each tool gets complicated. It also maps common failure points such as limited batch automation, shallow color management, and growing layer stacks.
Easy photo editing software that turns common edits into repeatable workflows
Easy-to-use photo editing software provides non-destructive adjustments that can be revisited, with selection and masking tools for targeted edits. It reduces friction by keeping the editor centered on common tasks like exposure correction, white balance changes, and quick background removal.
This category typically serves photographers and small teams that need fast deliverables without taking on a full compositor workflow. Tools like Polarr and Canva demonstrate how presets, guided controls, and one-click cutouts can cover the most frequent edit requests.
Evaluation checklist for editors that feel simple without becoming limited
Ease of use in photo editing comes from how quickly the tool reaches repeatable outcomes like consistent color looks, clean cutouts, and batch export. It also depends on whether edits remain editable when later changes are needed.
The checklist below emphasizes concrete capabilities tied to what tools actually do well. Adobe Photoshop prioritizes deep retouching and compositing control, while Capture One centers on repeatable RAW workflows and catalog-based delivery.
One-click background removal with controlled edge behavior
Background removal should produce usable cutouts with minimal manual cleanup. Canva generates product and portrait cutouts with automatic edge cleanup, while BeFunky and Fotor focus on guided or one-tap cutouts for fast polishing.
Editable selection and mask workflows for reversible edits
Reversible edits matter because later changes are common during review and iteration. Photoshop and Pixlr rely on adjustment layers with layer masks to keep changes controllable, while Photopea adds a layered editor experience inside a browser with adjustment layers and masks.
RAW development controls that match the editor’s workflow
RAW development should be deep enough for exposure, white balance, lens correction, and noise reduction without forcing a separate pipeline. Capture One is built around RAW processing and batch delivery with ICC-handled output controls, while Lightroom provides RAW adjustments synced across desktop and mobile through a single catalog.
Preset-driven look consistency across sets
Repeatable looks require saved presets that can be applied across multiple images with minimal adjustment time. Polarr uses one-click look presets with sliders that update across saved styles, while Capture One provides Styles plus variants to apply one edit logic across a set while preserving per-image adjustments.
Export coverage that fits real deliverables
Easy editing still fails if export formats do not match production needs. Photoshop outputs JPEG, PNG transparency, and print-oriented TIFF workflows, while Polarr and Pixlr cover JPEG and PNG transparency and keep export settings consistent for teams.
Batch processing that does not collapse nuance
Batch processing should apply repeatable edits across multiple images without forcing heavy manual repeats. PhotoScape X applies the same edits across folders with minimal setup time, while Capture One supports batch workflows designed for predictable multi-image delivery through catalog organization.
Pick the tool by mapping the editing workflow to the UI model
Start with the edit shape rather than the file format. Photoshop and Pixlr favor layered editing control, while Canva and Fotor favor guided one-click cutouts and quick finishing.
Then confirm that the tool’s simplicity does not hide missing depth in the areas needed most. Polarr and Lightroom emphasize quick repeatable RAW and masking workflows, while Photopea and Pixlr are browser-first layer editors with performance constraints on large documents.
Choose the editor model: layer-compositor control or guided task edits
If the workflow requires detailed compositing and object removal, Adobe Photoshop fits because content-aware fills support editable sampling and refined object removal without rebuilding the whole composition. If the workflow needs quick results with fewer controls, Canva keeps cropping, filters, and background removal close to exporting share-ready visuals.
Match the RAW depth to the consistency goal
If consistency across batches is the main requirement, Capture One applies one edit logic through Styles plus variants and organizes delivery with catalog and batch workflows. If the main requirement is synced convenience across devices for photographers, Lightroom keeps non-destructive RAW adjustments and masking editable inside a single catalog across desktop and mobile.
Select for cutout speed if backgrounds dominate the workload
For product and portrait cutouts where edge quality matters, Canva’s one-click background removal includes automatic edge cleanup for cleaner edges. For fast cutouts in a browser, BeFunky and Pixlr prioritize background and object removal workflows with guided or layer-based refinement.
Decide how repeatability is achieved: presets or variants
If repeatability means applying the same look across many images, Polarr’s one-click presets with adjustable sliders update across saved styles and reduce per-image tweaking. If repeatability means reusing logic while allowing per-image differences, Capture One’s styles plus variants preserve per-image adjustments.
Validate export formats against the target pipeline
For print-ready delivery and mixed web and graphic needs, Photoshop supports JPEG, PNG transparency, and print-oriented TIFF export workflows. If PNG transparency and web delivery are the main targets, Polarr and Pixlr focus export on JPEG and PNG transparency without deep print-tuning complexity.
Avoid tools that hide complexity behind limited automation or shallow color management
If batch pipelines need per-image nuance beyond basic repetition, Polarr’s batch pipelines lack fine-grained per-image automation controls and can feel limiting for advanced selection edge cases. If strict ICC workflows matter, Photoshop’s color-managed output depends on applying the correct ICC profile, while Capture One and Lightroom provide ICC handling with export-focused controls and Polarr keeps deep color management as a secondary focus.
Which teams and photographers benefit from easy photo editing without sacrificing control
Easy-to-use photo editors fit teams that need predictable output while keeping edits editable for later changes. The right choice depends on whether the primary pain is cutouts, RAW batch consistency, or review-driven adjustments.
The segments below map to the stated best-for use cases and the specific editing strengths each tool carries.
Small teams needing repeatable edits with minimal complexity overhead
Polarr fits teams that want fast, timeline-free photo edits with presets and non-destructive adjustments that remain easy to revisit. BeFunky also fits social and design mockup workflows where background removal and guided touch-ups are used more than deep RAW control.
RAW photographers producing consistent batches for delivery
Capture One fits RAW photographers who need non-destructive adjustment layers plus catalog and batch workflows for predictable delivery. Lightroom fits photographers who want quick repeatable RAW edits with masking and selective adjustments synced across desktop and mobile using a single catalog.
Marketing teams that iterate cutouts and social formats inside a design workflow
Canva fits marketing teams that need fast background removal and template-based sizing for social and marketing creatives. Its cloud collaboration and comments on assets reduce review churn when edits must stay tied to specific creatives.
Web-first teams that need a Photoshop-like layered editor in the browser
Pixlr fits teams that want browser-based editing with adjustment layers, editable layer masks, selection and masking tools, and quick JPEG or PNG transparency export for web deliverables. Photopea fits browser workflows that need PSD import and layered editing inside a familiar workspace, with TIFF export for print-oriented deliverables.
Teams that repeat the same edits across many folders on desktop
PhotoScape X fits desktop workflows where batch processing applies repeatable edits across folders with minimal setup time. It also supports RAW conversion plus one-shot JPEG and PNG transparency output for graphics-style overlays.
Common reasons easy photo editors become frustrating mid-project
Many editing projects fail due to mismatches between the tool’s simplicity and the required workflow depth. The most frequent problems come from limited layer workflow depth, shallow automation, and color management gaps.
These pitfalls show up across the tools and have concrete workarounds tied to specific editors.
Assuming one-click tools cover advanced edge cases
Canva’s one-click background removal is fast for product and portrait cutouts, but complex selection edges can still require more advanced control than Canva’s limited non-destructive workflows. For deeper edge refinement and reversible control, switch to Photoshop or Pixlr where selection and layer masks support more detailed cleanup.
Choosing a browser editor for large, multi-layer documents
Photopea and Pixlr are browser-first layered editors, but browser performance can lag on very large documents and complex projects. For large layer stacks that slow down editing or for heavy compositing needs, Adobe Photoshop is built for detailed control with robust layer masking and selection tooling.
Relying on basic batch processing when per-image nuance is required
Polarr and PhotoScape X support batch-oriented repeatability, but Polarr lacks fine-grained per-image automation controls and PhotoScape X targets guided, repeatable edits. Capture One fits better when batch delivery must preserve variants and consistent logic through Styles plus variants.
Treating color management as an afterthought for critical output
Photoshop provides color-managed output with ICC handling, but output depends on consistently applying the correct ICC profile for the target. Capture One and Lightroom include ICC-handled export controls that are designed for consistency, while Polarr keeps deep color management from being its focus.
Expecting advanced object removal from tools built for quick finishing
Photoshop’s content-aware fill with editable sampling enables refined object removal without rebuilding the composition. Canva, BeFunky, and Fotor focus on quick cutouts and touch-ups where object removal is intended for light polishing rather than deep compositing.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Adobe Photoshop, Polarr, Capture One, Canva, Pixlr, Adobe Lightroom, BeFunky, Photopea, Fotor, and PhotoScape X by scoring each tool on features, ease of use, and value, with features carrying the most weight while ease of use and value each account for a large share of the overall score. The scoring emphasizes concrete workflow capabilities such as layer masks, adjustment layers, non-destructive RAW development controls, background removal behavior, export format coverage, and batch repeatability rather than generic usability claims.
Adobe Photoshop set the ranking apart because it combines reversible layer masks and adjustment layers with RAW development that supports lens and perspective correction plus content-aware fill with editable sampling for refined object removal. That combination lifted the tool through both feature breadth and practical ease of iterating on complex edits, which in turn improved the overall rating more than tools that focus on guided edits or preset-driven finishing.
Frequently Asked Questions About easy to use photo editing software
Which tools handle non-destructive layer workflows for detailed edits?
How does batch processing work across easy-to-use editors?
Which editor is best for repeatable RAW development without rebuilding settings each time?
When should a browser-based tool be chosen instead of a desktop editor?
What breaks if a workflow needs transparent PNG and print-oriented exports in one pass?
How do easy editors handle background removal and edge refinement?
Which tools keep masking workflows editable after color and retouch changes?
How do integrations and APIs differ for photo editing inside broader systems?
Which tools provide security controls like SSO, RBAC, or audit logs for team workflows?
How is data migration handled when moving existing catalogs or layered files into a new editor?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→