GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Construction InfrastructureTop 9 Best Crane Inspection Software of 2026
Discover top 10 crane inspection software to streamline compliance, safety & efficiency. Compare features & choose the best fit today.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
SafetyCulture
Offline inspections with evidence capture and automated report generation
Built for teams running standardized crane inspections with evidence capture and tracked corrective actions.
GoCanvas
Offline-capable GoCanvas mobile inspections with attachments and signatures
Built for field teams needing mobile inspection checklists with approvals and evidence capture.
MaintainX
Mobile offline-capable inspections that generate work orders from completed checklist items
Built for maintenance teams standardizing crane inspection checklists across multiple sites.
Comparison Table
This comparison table reviews crane inspection software used to schedule inspections, capture field evidence, and manage corrective actions across SafetyCulture, GoCanvas, MaintainX, UpKeep, Fiix, and other common platforms. Readers can compare key capabilities such as offline capture, inspection workflows, asset and location tracking, reporting, audit trails, and integrations to select the best fit for compliance and maintenance operations.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SafetyCulture Digital inspection templates for cranes and lifting gear support checklists, photo evidence, issue tracking, and compliance reporting across teams. | inspection platform | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 2 | GoCanvas Form and workflow automation for mobile inspection lets crews run crane checklists, capture photos, and route findings into scheduled corrective work. | form automation | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 3 | MaintainX Maintenance management workflows support scheduled crane inspections, asset-based records, and task-driven remediation with mobile execution. | CMMS for inspection | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 4 | UpKeep Asset-centric maintenance and inspection scheduling for cranes supports recurring checks, mobile reporting, and maintenance histories. | maintenance management | 7.5/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 5 | Fiix Cloud CMMS provides inspection scheduling for lifting equipment, maintenance work orders, and historical compliance evidence per asset. | CMMS | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 6 | Nexudus Digital inspection and audit workflows help manage crane safety checks, findings, and remedial tasks with controlled documentation. | audit workflows | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 7 | OnSiteIQ Mobile inspections for job sites enable crane checks with photos, standardized forms, and actionable reporting for safety programs. | site inspections | 7.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 8 | Contractor Foreman Construction workflow and inspection processes let teams run equipment checks, track issues, and coordinate corrective work across sites. | construction operations | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 9 | Autodesk Construction Cloud Inspection and field documentation workflows support structured crane-related checklists and evidence capture tied to construction projects. | construction cloud | 8.0/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.6/10 |
Digital inspection templates for cranes and lifting gear support checklists, photo evidence, issue tracking, and compliance reporting across teams.
Form and workflow automation for mobile inspection lets crews run crane checklists, capture photos, and route findings into scheduled corrective work.
Maintenance management workflows support scheduled crane inspections, asset-based records, and task-driven remediation with mobile execution.
Asset-centric maintenance and inspection scheduling for cranes supports recurring checks, mobile reporting, and maintenance histories.
Cloud CMMS provides inspection scheduling for lifting equipment, maintenance work orders, and historical compliance evidence per asset.
Digital inspection and audit workflows help manage crane safety checks, findings, and remedial tasks with controlled documentation.
Mobile inspections for job sites enable crane checks with photos, standardized forms, and actionable reporting for safety programs.
Construction workflow and inspection processes let teams run equipment checks, track issues, and coordinate corrective work across sites.
Inspection and field documentation workflows support structured crane-related checklists and evidence capture tied to construction projects.
SafetyCulture
inspection platformDigital inspection templates for cranes and lifting gear support checklists, photo evidence, issue tracking, and compliance reporting across teams.
Offline inspections with evidence capture and automated report generation
SafetyCulture stands out for turning crane inspections into repeatable digital workflows with offline capture and instant reports. The platform supports checklist-based inspections, photo and video evidence, location and asset tagging, and role-based sign-off for findings. Teams can standardize templates and prompts for hazards, then share exportable inspection outputs for compliance and internal audits. Findings can be converted into tracked actions with ownership and status updates across inspection cycles.
Pros
- Offline-first inspection capture keeps checks moving in remote crane sites
- Configurable checklists with evidence and structured findings reduce reporting gaps
- Action tracking links inspection issues to owners and resolution status
- Consistent templates support multi-site standardization and repeatable audits
Cons
- Complex workflows require careful setup to avoid fragmented evidence
- Advanced customization can feel heavy for teams needing simple paper-to-PDF replacement
- Integrations beyond core workflow rely on external tooling for full data pipelines
Best For
Teams running standardized crane inspections with evidence capture and tracked corrective actions
GoCanvas
form automationForm and workflow automation for mobile inspection lets crews run crane checklists, capture photos, and route findings into scheduled corrective work.
Offline-capable GoCanvas mobile inspections with attachments and signatures
GoCanvas stands out with mobile-first form capture and field workflow execution for inspections, including crane inspection checklists and daily reports. The platform supports structured data entry, photo attachments, and signature capture tied to each inspection record. Inspections can be routed through approval steps so issues and completion status are visible back in the office.
Pros
- Mobile forms with photo and signature capture for inspection evidence
- Workflow and approvals link field completion to back-office review
- Offline-capable data entry helps inspections continue without connectivity
Cons
- Complex inspection workflows can require careful configuration
- Limited crane-specific automation reduces out-of-box specialization
- Reporting customization can be slower than spreadsheet-style reporting
Best For
Field teams needing mobile inspection checklists with approvals and evidence capture
MaintainX
CMMS for inspectionMaintenance management workflows support scheduled crane inspections, asset-based records, and task-driven remediation with mobile execution.
Mobile offline-capable inspections that generate work orders from completed checklist items
MaintainX distinguishes itself with field-first maintenance workflows that connect assets, checklists, and work orders into a consistent execution layer. The platform supports inspection plans, recurring preventive maintenance, and mobile capture for condition notes, photos, and compliance-oriented documentation. It also provides asset hierarchies and history so crane inspection results remain tied to specific equipment and maintenance schedules. Reporting and auditing features help managers track open issues, overdue tasks, and recurring defect patterns across sites.
Pros
- Mobile checklist inspections with photo and note capture for crane components
- Asset hierarchy ties inspections to specific cranes and maintenance history
- Recurring work orders support consistent periodic crane inspection cycles
- Analytics show overdue tasks, open issues, and recurring inspection findings
Cons
- Crane-specific inspection templates require setup work for full adoption
- Advanced reporting can feel rigid without careful configuration
- Multi-site governance takes time to standardize forms and workflows
Best For
Maintenance teams standardizing crane inspection checklists across multiple sites
UpKeep
maintenance managementAsset-centric maintenance and inspection scheduling for cranes supports recurring checks, mobile reporting, and maintenance histories.
Mobile checklist-driven crane inspection work orders with photo attachments
UpKeep stands out by combining mobile-first work order execution with standardized asset maintenance workflows tied to inspection checklists. It supports recurring crane inspections, task scheduling, assignment, and photo evidence captured during field work. The system centralizes documentation so inspection histories and corrective actions stay linked to each crane asset. It also provides reporting to track compliance and maintenance completion across sites.
Pros
- Mobile inspection capture with checklist workflows for cranes and other assets
- Recurring tasks and assignment keep inspection schedules on track
- Photo and attachment support improves audit-ready inspection evidence
- Maintenance history stays organized per asset for faster follow-ups
- Dashboards and reports help monitor completion and compliance
Cons
- Workflow flexibility can feel limited for highly custom crane inspection standards
- Reporting depth for regulatory compliance varies by how data is modeled
- Some advanced automation needs careful setup across assets and tasks
Best For
Maintenance teams needing mobile crane inspections with checklist-based work orders
Fiix
CMMSCloud CMMS provides inspection scheduling for lifting equipment, maintenance work orders, and historical compliance evidence per asset.
Inspection findings that generate corrective work orders inside the same maintenance workflow
Fiix distinguishes itself with structured asset maintenance workflows that connect inspections to work orders and corrective actions. It supports mobile inspection data capture, checklists, and photos so crane findings can be recorded consistently. The platform ties inspection outcomes to follow-up tasks and audit trails for compliance oriented maintenance teams.
Pros
- Mobile inspection checklists with photo capture for accurate crane findings
- Automated linkage from inspection findings to corrective work orders
- Strong maintenance workflow structure with clear task ownership
Cons
- Crane specific workflows require setup to match unique inspection regimes
- Reporting and dashboards need configuration for advanced compliance views
- Multi-site asset and approval processes can feel heavy for small teams
Best For
Maintenance teams managing crane inspections and corrective actions in one workflow
Nexudus
audit workflowsDigital inspection and audit workflows help manage crane safety checks, findings, and remedial tasks with controlled documentation.
Nexudus mobile inspections tied to work orders and asset records
Nexudus stands out with a workflow-first mobile inspection experience that centers work orders, assets, and field execution. It supports crane inspection processes through structured forms, checklists, and the ability to capture findings in the field and route them into operations. It also emphasizes collaboration with team roles, task assignment, and status tracking so inspection work can move through defined stages. For crane-heavy environments, it fits best when inspections need consistent documentation and traceability rather than custom one-off spreadsheets.
Pros
- Workflow-driven inspection execution with work orders, assets, and checklists
- Mobile-friendly capture of inspection findings for field-to-back-office continuity
- Team roles and task tracking help keep crane inspection statuses visible
Cons
- Configuration effort can be high for crane-specific data structures and rules
- Advanced reporting depends on how inspection data is modeled upfront
- Usability can feel complex when many inspection steps and permissions are enabled
Best For
Teams standardizing crane inspections with mobile capture and workflow tracking
OnSiteIQ
site inspectionsMobile inspections for job sites enable crane checks with photos, standardized forms, and actionable reporting for safety programs.
Mobile inspection capture that ties findings to equipment and photo evidence for audit-ready closure
OnSiteIQ stands out for handling field inspection workflows with a mobile-first capture process tailored to asset checks and documentation. It supports structured inspection forms, photo evidence collection, and automated routing so crane inspections can move through review and closure steps. The system also manages findings and generates audit-ready records that tie work performed to specific equipment and locations. Reporting emphasizes traceability across inspections rather than only producing summary spreadsheets.
Pros
- Mobile capture with photos and structured inspection fields
- Workflow routing connects inspectors, reviewers, and closure
- Audit trails link findings to equipment, dates, and evidence
Cons
- Form and workflow setup can feel heavy for simple inspections
- Reporting is stronger for audit trails than deep analytics
- Role-based controls require careful configuration for scaling
Best For
Operations teams running repeat crane inspections with photo evidence and audit trails
Contractor Foreman
construction operationsConstruction workflow and inspection processes let teams run equipment checks, track issues, and coordinate corrective work across sites.
Checklist-based crane inspections stored per job with evidence attachments
Contractor Foreman focuses on turning crane inspection paperwork into structured, job-linked records with inspector assignments and repeatable checklists. The tool supports scheduling and workflow tracking around inspections, along with document storage for evidence like photos and notes. It emphasizes field-to-office visibility through centralized inspection history that teams can search by job and date. The solution is strongest when inspections are part of a broader contractor job management flow rather than a standalone inspection-only app.
Pros
- Job-linked inspection records keep crane checks tied to specific projects
- Checklist-driven inspections standardize forms and reduce missed fields
- Stored evidence supports audit-ready proof with photos and notes
- Scheduling and workflow tracking help coordinate inspection timing
- Searchable inspection history improves review and compliance follow-up
Cons
- Crane-specific workflows can require setup beyond generic inspection needs
- Reporting depth depends on how teams model inspections and fields
- User permissions and approval flows may feel limited for complex governance
- Mobile capture experience can vary based on field connectivity
Best For
Contractor teams managing crane inspections inside broader job workflow
Autodesk Construction Cloud
construction cloudInspection and field documentation workflows support structured crane-related checklists and evidence capture tied to construction projects.
BIM-linked field documentation with inspection photo evidence and traceable issue history
Autodesk Construction Cloud stands out for connecting crane inspection workflows to broader BIM and project documentation through Autodesk Construction Cloud and Autodesk Construction Cloud Field. The platform supports structured inspection checklists, mobile capture, photo attachments, and issue tracking so defects link to drawings and project records. It also enables collaboration via shared documents, managed work packages, and audit-friendly histories of inspection findings and resolutions. For crane inspection use cases, the strongest fit is when inspection data must feed project controls and model-based context.
Pros
- Model-linked document workflows connect crane findings to project records
- Mobile inspections support photo evidence, structured checklists, and offline-ready capture
- Issue tracking keeps defect status, history, and handoffs organized
Cons
- Crane-specific inspection templates require setup to avoid repetitive custom work
- Model context depends on consistent data alignment and drawing management
- Workflow configuration can be heavy for teams that only need basic checklists
Best For
Teams needing inspections tied to model context and cross-project documentation
Conclusion
After evaluating 9 construction infrastructure, SafetyCulture stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Crane Inspection Software
This buyer's guide helps teams select Crane Inspection Software for checklist-based safety checks, evidence capture, and corrective action tracking. It covers SafetyCulture, GoCanvas, MaintainX, UpKeep, Fiix, Nexudus, OnSiteIQ, Contractor Foreman, and Autodesk Construction Cloud alongside five other leading options.
What Is Crane Inspection Software?
Crane Inspection Software is a workflow system for running crane and lifting gear inspections with structured checklists, photo evidence, and tracked findings tied to specific assets or locations. It replaces paper and disconnected spreadsheets by routing inspections through roles, approvals, and closure steps with audit-ready records. Tools like SafetyCulture and OnSiteIQ focus on mobile capture plus evidence and traceable closure so inspections remain provable during safety and compliance reviews. MaintainX and UpKeep extend this into maintenance and recurring work so inspection outcomes turn into scheduled corrective actions.
Key Features to Look For
The right crane inspection tool must turn field capture into standardized evidence, enforceable workflows, and actionable follow-up so compliance and safety improve without creating extra admin work.
Offline-first mobile inspections with evidence capture
Offline capture matters because crane sites often have unreliable connectivity, and SafetyCulture delivers offline inspections with photo and automated report generation. MaintainX also supports mobile offline-capable inspections that generate work orders from completed checklist items.
Checklist-driven inspections tied to assets, locations, or jobs
Inspections must attach to the right crane or project so findings remain traceable over time. Contractor Foreman stores checklist-based crane inspections per job with evidence attachments, while UpKeep and MaintainX tie findings to asset records and maintenance histories.
Photo and attachment evidence linked to each finding
Audit readiness depends on attaching evidence to the specific defect or hazard, not just to the overall inspection. SafetyCulture includes photo and video evidence on structured findings, and Fiix captures mobile inspection checklists with photo capture for accurate crane findings.
Action tracking that turns findings into corrective work
Corrective work must connect back to inspection outcomes so issues do not disappear after closure. SafetyCulture converts findings into tracked actions with ownership and resolution status, and Fiix generates corrective work orders inside the same maintenance workflow.
Work orders and recurring inspection plans for continuous compliance
Recurring schedules keep inspections consistent across equipment and sites, and they also help managers monitor overdue tasks. MaintainX supports recurring preventive maintenance and inspection plans, while UpKeep provides recurring crane inspection scheduling with assignment and photo evidence.
Workflow routing across roles with approvals and status tracking
Workflow routing ensures inspectors, reviewers, and closure owners follow a defined path for every inspection. GoCanvas routes field completion through approval steps so office teams can track completion status, and Nexudus routes mobile inspection findings into work order and asset-based stages.
How to Choose the Right Crane Inspection Software
Selection should match the way inspections are executed in the field and the way corrective work or project controls are managed in the office.
Match offline and mobile evidence needs to site conditions
If inspections must continue on remote crane sites, prioritize offline-capable capture such as SafetyCulture and MaintainX. If evidence must include photo and also signatures for each inspection record, choose GoCanvas for mobile forms that capture photos and signatures tied to each record.
Decide what the inspection must be tied to: asset, job, or model context
For asset-centric programs that need maintenance histories, tools like UpKeep and MaintainX keep inspection results linked to specific equipment and schedules. For contractor workflows that organize inspections per project, Contractor Foreman stores inspection history searchable by job and date. For projects that must connect inspections to drawings and BIM context, Autodesk Construction Cloud links inspection photo evidence and issue tracking to project records.
Confirm that inspection findings create tracked corrective work, not just reports
Teams that need closure discipline should require action tracking or work-order generation from checklist findings. SafetyCulture links inspection issues to owners with resolution status updates, while Fiix ties inspection outcomes to follow-up tasks inside the maintenance workflow.
Validate the workflow stages used by the actual inspection process
If inspections require review and approval routing, GoCanvas provides approval steps that make back-office review and completion status visible. If work order stages and role-based task tracking are required, Nexudus centers work orders, assets, and checklist execution with status tracking across defined stages.
Evaluate how much configuration is required for crane-specific standards
If crane templates and data structures must be complex, choose tools designed for configurable workflows like SafetyCulture and Autodesk Construction Cloud. If the organization needs faster rollout with more standard inspection execution, OnSiteIQ and Contractor Foreman emphasize repeatable audit trails with structured forms and evidence linked to equipment and dates.
Who Needs Crane Inspection Software?
Crane Inspection Software benefits teams that must standardize inspections, attach evidence to findings, and keep corrective actions connected to the original checks.
Standardized crane inspection programs that require offline field capture and audit-ready evidence
SafetyCulture fits because offline inspections capture photo and video evidence and generate automated reports with tracked corrective actions. OnSiteIQ also fits because it ties findings to equipment and photo evidence for audit-ready closure with mobile routing.
Field teams that run mobile checklists and need approvals and signatures as part of the inspection record
GoCanvas fits because it supports mobile-first inspection forms with photo attachments and signature capture tied to each inspection record. It also routes completion through approval steps so office teams can see status and closure readiness.
Maintenance teams managing crane inspections as recurring preventive maintenance tied to work orders
MaintainX fits because it supports inspection plans, recurring preventive maintenance, and mobile capture that generates work orders from completed checklist items. UpKeep fits because it provides recurring crane inspection task scheduling with assignment, checklists, and photo evidence tied to maintenance histories.
Organizations that need inspections tied into broader project documentation and model-based context
Autodesk Construction Cloud fits because it connects crane inspection workflows to BIM-linked project documentation with issue tracking that keeps defect status and history organized. SafetyCulture and Nexudus also fit for structured traceability, but Autodesk Construction Cloud is strongest when inspection findings must link to project records and drawings.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Common buying failures come from selecting tools that cannot deliver evidence-linked workflows, from underestimating setup effort for crane-specific standards, and from choosing systems that produce reports without enforceable corrective action tracking.
Choosing a system that captures checklists but does not enforce evidence-linked corrective work
SafetyCulture avoids this gap by converting findings into tracked actions with ownership and resolution status updates. Fiix avoids it by generating corrective work orders inside the same maintenance workflow so findings move directly into remediation.
Underestimating the configuration work for crane-specific templates and roles
Multiple tools, including MaintainX and Nexudus, require setup work for crane-specific inspection templates and rules for full adoption. SafetyCulture also needs careful workflow setup to prevent fragmented evidence when teams use advanced customization.
Assuming generic inspection structures will fit all sites without asset or job linkage
UpKeep ties inspection histories to asset records, which prevents findings from becoming detached from the crane they describe. Contractor Foreman ties inspections to jobs and supports searchable inspection history by job and date, which prevents cross-project confusion.
Treating offline capture as optional when inspections occur on remote sites
SafetyCulture and MaintainX provide offline-first inspection capture so inspections continue with evidence capture when connectivity is unavailable. GoCanvas also supports offline-capable data entry so mobile crews can complete inspections with attachments and signatures.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features carry weight 0.4, ease of use carries weight 0.3, and value carries weight 0.3. The overall rating is computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. SafetyCulture separated itself with strong offline-first inspection capture and automated report generation, which scored highly in features while still scoring well for ease of use.
Frequently Asked Questions About Crane Inspection Software
Which crane inspection tools work offline in the field?
SafetyCulture supports offline inspections with evidence capture and instant report generation after syncing. GoCanvas also supports offline-capable mobile inspections with photo attachments and signature capture tied to each inspection record.
Which platforms convert inspection findings into corrective work orders automatically?
MaintainX generates work orders from completed checklist items so open issues turn into scheduled maintenance tasks. Fiix ties inspection outcomes to follow-up tasks with audit trails and corrective action workflows in the same maintenance system.
Which crane inspection software is best for standardized checklists and role-based sign-off?
SafetyCulture standardizes checklist templates and prompts for hazard capture while supporting role-based sign-off for findings. Contractor Foreman uses repeatable checklists with inspector assignment and job-linked records so approvals stay tied to the specific inspection.
Which option offers the strongest photo and audit-ready traceability across equipment and locations?
OnSiteIQ generates audit-ready records by tying findings to specific equipment and collecting photo evidence for review and closure steps. UpKeep centralizes inspection histories and corrective actions by crane asset, then reports compliance and maintenance completion across sites.
Which tools support inspection workflows with approval routing back to the office?
GoCanvas routes inspections through approval steps so issue status and completion visibility return to office teams. OnSiteIQ also routes inspections into review and closure steps with structured findings and automated workflow movement.
Which platforms connect crane inspections to broader asset management and maintenance schedules?
MaintainX connects asset hierarchies and history so crane inspection results remain tied to specific equipment and recurring preventive maintenance. Nexudus centers work orders, assets, and field execution so inspection documentation stays traceable across defined workflow stages.
Which crane inspection software is designed for operations teams that need evidence-led closure records?
OnSiteIQ emphasizes traceability and generates audit-ready closure records backed by photos and structured inspection forms. SafetyCulture also supports photo and video evidence collection and converts findings into tracked actions with ownership and status updates.
Which solution is better when crane inspections must link to drawings and model context?
Autodesk Construction Cloud connects mobile inspection checklists and photo evidence to project documentation so issues link to drawings and project records. This model-aware context is a stronger fit than standalone inspection-only workflows.
Which tool is best when inspections are part of a larger contractor job management flow?
Contractor Foreman stores inspection documentation per job with centralized inspection history searchable by job and date, and it supports scheduling and workflow tracking around inspections. This design aligns better with contractor operations than an inspection-only approach.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Construction Infrastructure alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of construction infrastructure tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare construction infrastructure tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.