
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Composition Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of top composition software for music creators, comparing Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, capella, Forte Notation, Guitar Pro.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Capella is the go-to composition tool when you need score-first authoring with playback validation and reliable MusicXML handoff, while Guitar Pro fits guitar-focused charts that demand tab and notation working together for rehearsal-ready playback, and LMMS is a solid low-cost pick if you want MIDI-first desktop arranging without paying for a full notation suite.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
capella
A notation-driven editing loop keeps engraving decisions and MIDI audition in sync during incremental composition.
Built for fits when composers need score-first authoring with playback validation and MusicXML interchange for handoff..
Forte Notation
Editor pickEngraving rule processing keeps layout decisions consistent during rapid score edits.
Built for fits when notation deliverables matter and MIDI-to-score workflows must stay accurate..
Guitar Pro
Editor pickTab-first editing with synchronized notation playback for guitar parts during rapid arrangement changes.
Built for fits when guitar charts need accurate tab and notation with rehearsal-ready playback..
Comparison Table
capella
SMBNotation software for composing, arranging, and editing sheet music with playback features.
A notation-driven editing loop keeps engraving decisions and MIDI audition in sync during incremental composition.
capella is built around score-first authoring, where notation input drives layout and playback, instead of treating notation as a rendering step. The editing workflow supports score parts, rehearsal markings, dynamics, articulations, and chord symbol engraving, so mockups can mature into publishable pages inside one document. MusicXML import and export supports interoperability when migrating material between notation tools or orchestration workflows. MIDI sequencing features help validate timing and articulation before finalizing the engraved version.
The main tradeoff is that audio production stays limited compared with DAWs that focus on track-based mixing and recording. A composer can draft full notation and test playback inside capella, then export for external audio production or further mastering. Teams with shared writing standards may need explicit document discipline because engraving behavior can vary by how parts, voices, and staff assignments are set up.
- +Score-first editing keeps engraving and playback aligned
- +MusicXML import and export supports practical interchange workflows
- +Chord symbol engraving integrates with harmonized writing
- +MIDI sequencing supports auditioning timing before print finalization
- –Mixing and audio production workflows remain secondary to notation
- –Complex orchestration requires careful part and voice assignment setup
Composers and arrangers
Write and audition full scores quickly
Faster iteration toward print-ready output
Songwriters for lead sheets
Generate rehearsal-ready chord charts
Readable charts for rehearsals
Show 1 more scenario
Notation teams and arrangers
Move scores between tools using MusicXML
Less re-entry when collaborating
Exchange projects through MusicXML to keep notation content transferable across different environments.
Best for: Fits when composers need score-first authoring with playback validation and MusicXML interchange for handoff.
Forte Notation
SMBMusic notation software for composing, arranging, transcribing, and printing scores.
Engraving rule processing keeps layout decisions consistent during rapid score edits.
Forte Notation focuses on writing music with score layout controls, including voice handling and multi-part organization that keeps notation consistent as edits accumulate. MIDI input can be refined into notation with mapping and rhythmic alignment tools, then checked via notation playback. MusicXML import helps move material from other editors, while part extraction supports generating separate score components for arranging and publishing workflows.
The main tradeoff is that audio production workflows such as mixing and routing are not the priority, so complex instrument tracking can require a separate production path. This fits situations where the deliverable is a clean, rehearsable score that must match played timing closely, especially when iterating on orchestration or transposed parts.
- +Notation editing stays tightly connected to MIDI-driven interpretation
- +MusicXML import supports cross-tool score migration
- +Part extraction supports workflow for arranging deliverables
- +Engraving rules reduce manual cleanup after edits
- –Audio mixing and routing depth is limited compared with DAWs
- –Advanced setup for MIDI mapping can slow early projects
Composer-arrangers
Iterate orchestration into printable parts
Rehearsal-ready parts faster
Film music editors
Create cues from MIDI sketches
Cue materials in score form
Show 2 more scenarios
Music educators
Convert student work to notation
Fewer notation correction cycles
MusicXML import and notation playback support checking rhythms against what students intended.
Publishing copyists
Extract and format multiple voices
Standardized output batches
Part extraction supports producing consistent layouts for individual instrument and rehearsal files.
Best for: Fits when notation deliverables matter and MIDI-to-score workflows must stay accurate.
Guitar Pro
vertical specialistTablature and notation software with chord diagrams, fretboard views, playback, and score editing.
Tab-first editing with synchronized notation playback for guitar parts during rapid arrangement changes.
Guitar Pro includes a score editor that renders standard notation and guitar tablature together, which helps when parts must stay legible for both reading and performance. Notation playback follows the written parts so rhythmic and articulation edits can be verified without switching tools. The engraving rules cover typical layout needs for bands, and the project structure supports multi-part arrangements like songs and sets. MIDI sequencing is available for timing-focused edits that still need written notation as the source of truth.
A tradeoff shows up when projects require deep VST hosting workflows like extensive audio mixing or production automation across many tracks. Guitar Pro is also less aligned to API-driven pipeline work since automation and integration depth are limited compared with DAW ecosystems. Guitar Pro works best when building guitar-centered charts that must stay accurate through editing, rehearsal, and export.
- +Tab and standard notation stay synchronized during editing
- +Notation playback helps validate rhythm and articulation quickly
- +Transposition updates parts while preserving arrangement structure
- +Song-oriented part organization fits band chart workflows
- –Limited audio production depth compared with DAW mixing workflows
- –Automation and integration options are thinner than DAW ecosystems
- –Large, heavily edited projects can feel slower than DAW editing
- –Advanced sound design depends on external workflows
Guitarists arranging full songs
Create parts with synchronized tab and notation
Fewer rehearsal corrections
Band rehearsal directors
Prepare consistent charts for sections
Faster section rehearsals
Show 2 more scenarios
Studio editors for parts
Adjust keys and generate performance-ready notation
Reworks stay organized
Use transposition to rework arrangements while keeping the written parts consistent.
Notation-driven composers
Iterate timing with MIDI sequencing
Timing matches notation
Edit timing using MIDI sequencing features while preserving notation as the primary view.
Best for: Fits when guitar charts need accurate tab and notation with rehearsal-ready playback.
PreSonus Notion
enterpriseMusic notation and composition software with integrated DAW playback capabilities.
Notation-to-playback consistency with engraving-aware edits that update what plays without rework.
PreSonus Notion blends notation-first composition with direct playback and score authoring inside a single workspace. Its core strengths are music engraving controls, flexible part layouts, and score-centric workflows that keep MIDI and notation in sync during editing.
The software supports import and export paths needed for DAW handoff, including MusicXML and MIDI-based workflows. Notion also provides structured arrangement features like chord symbols and lyric-friendly text placement designed for repeatable score output.
- +Notation editing is tight and playback reflects written notation changes
- +Engraving controls support consistent staff layout across multiple parts
- +MusicXML and MIDI workflows help transfer ideas into DAWs
- +Text elements like lyrics and rehearsal marks follow score structure cleanly
- –Advanced arrangement needs can feel slower than DAW-based MIDI editing
- –MIDI automation depth depends on export targets rather than in-app mixing
- –Feature breadth is notation-led, not media production-led
- –Large template projects require disciplined setup for consistent output
Best for: Fits when score-first composition and repeatable engraving output matter more than DAW-style production.
GarageBand
SMBMusic creation software with software instruments, audio recording, loops, and basic arrangement tools.
AU plugin hosting combined with integrated notation playback for instrument parts that stay editable.
GarageBand handles recording and arranging audio and MIDI in a timeline-style workspace, with instrument tracks and loops built for fast song building. It includes a notation view for standard staff editing, plus pitch and timing tools for corrective passes after capture.
Export options cover common audio workflows, and AU plugin support extends its instrument and effects coverage for projects already built around macOS audio tooling. Its collaboration story stays lighter than pro DAWs, with fewer enterprise-grade governance controls than environments built for many editors.
- +Tight audio and MIDI recording workflow with quick instrument switching
- +Notation editor supports staff changes and notation playback inside GarageBand
- +Freeze-style bounces for heavy instrument and effect chains
- +AU plugin hosting for expanding instrument and processing options
- –Notation and engraving depth is thinner than full production score editors
- –Project interchange with other DAWs is limited compared with pro DAW ecosystems
- –Automation lanes are less granular for advanced parameter automation
- –Multi-editor collaboration controls and audit trails are minimal
Best for: Fits when small creators need quick audio and MIDI production with light notation editing on macOS.
LMMS
SMBFree digital audio workstation for MIDI sequencing, beat creation, synthesis, and plugin-based production.
Pattern-based sequencing workflow that turns beat building into block arrangement for auditioning and export.
LMMS focuses on practical MIDI sequencing and software instrument workflows on a single desktop timeline. Its core toolset combines a piano roll for MIDI events, a built-in synth and sample player, and a mixer that routes tracks into audio effects and export.
Arrangement can be built from patterns and track blocks, then auditioned through internal playback and rendered via audio bounce. Score workflows exist through a notation-oriented editor, but the workflow centers on MIDI and audio rather than full DAW-grade engraving control.
- +Pattern and block arrangement workflow fits beat-first composition
- +Piano roll editing supports rapid MIDI iteration and event-level control
- +Built-in instrument collection covers synth and sample-driven production
- +Mixer routing enables effect chains across multiple tracks
- –Notation editing is thinner than dedicated notation-focused DAWs
- –Automation depth across complex plugin parameters can feel limited
- –Plugin support depends heavily on external compatibility and formats
- –Large projects can hit responsiveness limits on slower systems
Best for: Fits when MIDI-first producers want a desktop DAW-like editor with pattern-based arranging.
REAPER
SMBCustomizable digital audio workstation for recording, MIDI composition, editing, and mixing.
REAPER’s scripting and extensibility layer supports automation that can reach beyond the mixer and transport.
REAPER is a DAW built for workflows where deep routing and tight control matter more than preset-driven templates. Its core composition loop combines MIDI sequencing, VST hosting, and an advanced audio engine with flexible track routing, envelopes, and automation lanes.
REAPER also supports score writing through a dedicated notation workflow, including engraving-style output, staff layout controls, and export paths tied to media and notation playback. For integration depth, REAPER’s extensibility via scripts and plugins gives automation coverage beyond typical mixer-only DAWs.
- +Highly flexible track routing with per-track signal paths and send targets
- +Extensible automation via envelopes, scripting hooks, and API-driven customization
- +Fast MIDI editing with region-based workflows and quantize controls
- +Notation output workflow with staff layout controls and engraving-style behavior
- –Notation and MIDI-to-score workflows require manual setup and layout choices
- –UI configuration depth increases onboarding time for new users
Best for: Fits when composers need programmable automation and custom workflows, plus occasional notation output in one DAW.
Bitwig Studio
enterpriseDigital audio workstation for clip launching, modular sound design, MIDI sequencing, and arrangement.
Modulation system routes macro-style control into many parameters with editable sources and targets across devices.
Bitwig Studio is a DAW focused on rapid composition workflows, with modulation as a first-class design element. Clip-based MIDI sequencing combines pattern-like editing with deeper parameter control through automation lanes and modulation sources.
The arrangement supports both audio and instrument tracks while keeping editing and rendering tools tight enough for iterative writing and revision. Bitwig Studio also includes notation-capable views and multiple import paths so composers can move between MIDI sketches and score-oriented playback.
- +Modulation lanes make parameter automation editable at the musical level
- +Grid and arrangement workflows stay fast for MIDI sequencing and audio editing
- +Device architecture supports deep sound design without leaving the timeline
- +Notation and playback views help validate writing against phrasing
- –Notation workflow is less direct than dedicated notation-first editors
- –Advanced modulation routing can complicate preset and template reuse
- –Some score export paths need extra steps for parts and layout
- –Large sessions can tax CPU and interface responsiveness during heavy automation
Best for: Fits when composing with automation-heavy sound design and MIDI sequencing, plus occasional notation review.
Reason
SMBRack-based music production software with instruments, effects, sequencing, and audio recording.
Rack-first instrument chaining keeps sound design, MIDI sequencing, and staff playback connected in one project workflow.
Reason is a music composition environment that combines a rack-style synthesizer and sampler workflow with a built-in sequencer and notation-style staff editing. It supports MIDI sequencing for instruments you place in the rack and it can drive music production without leaving the project.
Reason also adds collaboration-ready export paths through standard audio bounce and MIDI data handling, plus reusable instrument devices that speed up repeated arrangement work. Engraving and score playback are available for projects that need staff layouts alongside studio tracking.
- +Rack-based sound design keeps instrument routing visible during composition
- +Built-in MIDI sequencing supports tight timing for instrument parts
- +Integrated staff editing supports writing and playback in the same project
- +Device-centric workflow speeds reuse of synth and sampler setups
- –Notation depth can lag DAWs with more advanced engraving controls
- –Cross-device workflows can be slower when rearranging large templates
- –Some notation features depend on workarounds for complex engraving needs
- –Extending instrument capabilities often depends on device availability
Best for: Fits when composing with rack-driven instruments and needing staff layouts for playback, not engraving-first publishing.
AIVA
API-firstAI-assisted composition platform for generating, editing, and exporting instrumental music.
AI composition generation that outputs editable multi-part material for immediate notation and MIDI auditioning.
AIVA focuses on AI-assisted composition workflows that turn musical input into structured parts and playable output. It provides a notation-facing workflow with a score editor view plus MIDI sequencing so users can iterate on harmonies, voicings, and arrangement decisions.
The core value comes from automating musical drafting and then refining the result inside its writing and playback loop. Production teams typically use AIVA when they need quick musical sketches that can be reworked before export.
- +AI-driven drafting reduces time spent generating initial musical material
- +Notation and MIDI sequencing support a tight write then audition loop
- +Generates multi-part outputs suitable for arrangement iterations
- +Works well for producing short cues and expanding them into sections
- –Fine-grained control over engraving rules is limited versus dedicated score editors
- –Export and interoperability options can constrain downstream DAW workflows
- –Complex orchestration details may need manual correction after generation
- –Iterative results depend on prompt input quality and style constraints
Best for: Fits when teams need fast musical sketching with notation and MIDI, then manual refinement for cues.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music and audio, capella stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right composition software
Composition software spans notation-first editors and music-production DAWs that keep notation playback, MIDI sequencing, and export paths aligned. This guide covers capella, Forte Notation, Guitar Pro, PreSonus Notion, GarageBand, LMMS, REAPER, Bitwig Studio, Reason, and AIVA.
The tradeoffs show up in engraving-to-playback consistency, MusicXML interchange, and how far automation and extensibility extend beyond a score. Each tool review focuses on where iterative composition work stays accurate, where it slows down, and what workflow constraints appear during arrangement and handoff.
Composition software evaluation criteria for score-first and DAW-style workflows
Composition software only stays fast when notation edits, MIDI audition, and interchange behave consistently during iteration. The most practical differences show up in how engraving-aware edits update playback and how reliably MusicXML moves written parts between tools.
Automation and extensibility determine whether routine tasks stay repeatable or become manual rework. Tools like capella and Forte Notation keep the notation loop tight, while REAPER focuses automation through scripting and API-driven customization and can reduce friction for custom workflows.
Engraving-aware edit loop with playback validation
capella keeps engraving decisions aligned with MIDI audition while composing incrementally. PreSonus Notion updates what plays directly from notation edits using engraving-aware controls across multiple parts.
MusicXML interchange for moving written parts between ecosystems
capella supports practical MusicXML import and export for handoff workflows. Forte Notation also includes MusicXML import for accurate cross-tool score migration that preserves MIDI-to-score interpretation.
Tab and notation synchronization for guitar-focused composition
Guitar Pro keeps tab-first editing synchronized with notation playback during arrangement changes for rehearsal-ready material. This design choice supports rapid validation of rhythm and articulation without leaving the editing loop.
Automation depth and extensibility surface
REAPER adds extensibility via scripting and API-driven customization that can extend automation beyond the mixer and transport. Bitwig Studio routes macro-style control into many parameter targets with editable modulation lanes across devices.
Interchange constraints when notation depth is secondary
GarageBand hosts AU instruments and includes integrated notation playback, but notation and engraving depth stays thinner than dedicated score editors. Reason uses a rack-first project workflow that connects staff playback, but notation depth can lag DAWs with more advanced engraving controls.
Workflow shape for MIDI-first beat building versus score publishing
LMMS uses a pattern-based sequencing workflow that turns beat building into block arrangement for auditioning and export. In contrast, capella and Forte Notation prioritize a score-first editing loop where engraving decisions remain consistent during rapid edits.
Choosing composition software based on iteration loop, interchange, and automation control
Selection should start from the iteration loop that matches daily work, because each tool optimizes different bottlenecks. Score-first editors keep engraving rules and playback in sync, while MIDI-first or rack-first tools optimize sequencing or sound design visibility during composition.
Automation and extensibility should be treated as a workflow requirement, not a nice-to-have. REAPER and Bitwig Studio offer deeper programmatic or modulation-level control than notation-focused editors, while capella, Forte Notation, and PreSonus Notion focus on consistent engraving-aware edits and practical MusicXML interchange.
Pick the primary authoring loop: score-first engraving or MIDI-first sequencing
If composition work is centered on engraving decisions that must match what plays, capella and PreSonus Notion keep notation and playback aligned during incremental edits. If composition work is centered on pattern-based beat building, LMMS focuses on pattern and block arrangement with piano roll event-level control.
Choose interchange needs: MusicXML handoff versus tool-local workflows
If written parts must travel between tools, Forte Notation and capella both support MusicXML import and export workflows designed for score migration. If staff layouts mainly support playback inside one project, Reason’s rack-first chaining prioritizes instrument routing visibility and can treat notation output as secondary.
Validate the sound design and automation model against real edit frequency
If frequent parameter automation changes must stay musical, Bitwig Studio’s modulation lanes let parameter automation remain editable at the musical level. If repeatable custom automation logic and deeper automation hooks are the priority, REAPER provides scripting and extensibility that can reach beyond transport controls.
Confirm whether notation depth is a deliverable or an accessory
If engraving decisions are deliverables, capella and Forte Notation keep the notation editing loop tightly connected to MIDI-driven interpretation. If notation depth is only used for quick playback and internal editing, GarageBand can be enough for small creators on macOS due to AU plugin hosting and integrated notation playback.
Match instrument specialty to the editing surface
If guitar charts require rapid arrangement changes with tab validation, Guitar Pro’s synchronized tab and standard notation playback supports rehearsal-ready rhythm and articulation checks. If rack-based instrument chaining is the composing center, Reason keeps sound design and MIDI sequencing connected in one workflow with staff layouts for playback.
Who should buy each composition software
Composition software fit depends on whether daily work is score publishing, chord and MIDI audition, or automation-heavy sound design. The right choice keeps edits from breaking the connection between what is written and what is heard.
Composers who start from engraving decisions and need playback to stay consistent
capella and PreSonus Notion keep notation edits aligned with MIDI audition so written changes remain accurate during incremental composition.
Users who routinely move written parts between tools and need practical interoperability
capella and Forte Notation both support MusicXML interchange patterns that keep cross-tool score migration accurate.
Guitarists building charts that require tab plus standard notation validation
Guitar Pro keeps tab-first editing synchronized with notation playback so rhythm and articulation can be validated quickly for rehearsal use.
Producers whose composing is automation-heavy and parameter-driven across instruments
Bitwig Studio’s modulation system makes parameter automation editable through musical lanes, and REAPER can extend automation through scripting and extensibility beyond the mixer and transport.
Teams that want fast drafting of ideas with immediate editable notation and MIDI audition
AIVA generates editable multi-part material that supports a write then audition loop, with manual refinement afterward for engraving-level control.
Common buyer pitfalls when choosing composition software
Mistakes usually happen when evaluation focuses on feature lists instead of workflow alignment. The fastest way to waste time is choosing a tool where the edit loop breaks the written-to-played connection or where automation needs exceed the product’s extension model.
Buying a notation-first editor and then treating it like a DAW mixer for audio production
capella and Forte Notation focus on notation and playback consistency, while mixing and routing depth remain secondary compared with DAWs like REAPER.
Assuming any tool can exchange written parts with the same fidelity as a MusicXML-focused workflow
capella and Forte Notation both support MusicXML interchange workflows designed for score migration, while tools like Reason can lag on engraving depth when staff layouts are rearranged at scale.
Choosing a sequencing-first tool for deliverable engraving quality
LMMS and Reason optimize MIDI sequencing or rack-driven sound design, so notation editing can feel thinner than dedicated notation-focused editors like capella and Forte Notation.
Overlooking automation depth when custom workflows matter more than notation output
REAPER provides scripting and extensibility that can reach beyond mixer and transport, while Bitwig Studio emphasizes modulation lanes that edit parameter automation at the musical level.
Underestimating the setup cost of MIDI mapping when using tools that require deeper early configuration
Forte Notation’s advanced MIDI mapping setup can slow early projects, so timeline pressure should be handled by planning part and voice assignments before full orchestration.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated capella, Forte Notation, Guitar Pro, PreSonus Notion, GarageBand, LMMS, REAPER, Bitwig Studio, Reason, and AIVA by weighting features at 40%, ease at 30%, and value at 30% across each tool’s notation-to-playback workflow and interoperability fit. Features coverage focused on engraving-aware edit loops, MIDI audition alignment, MusicXML interchange support, and the availability of automation or extensibility mechanisms like scripting or modulation lanes.
Ease coverage focused on how quickly users can get into a stable write and audition rhythm without manual layout rework, especially in capella and PreSonus Notion. Value coverage reflected how much real workflow is achievable inside each product, which is why capella ranked first for a notation-driven editing loop that keeps engraving decisions and MIDI audition in sync while also supporting MusicXML interchange for handoff.
Frequently Asked Questions About composition software
Which tools keep engraving decisions synchronized with what plays back during rapid edits?
How do Ableton-style MIDI workflows compare to score-first authoring in tools like Notion, Capella, and REAPER?
Which tool is best for guitar-specific notation when fretboard control and rehearsal marks both matter?
How should composers handle MusicXML interchange and score handoff between different composition tools?
What breaks if a composition workflow depends on VST hosting, scripting automation, or deep routing controls?
When should teams choose a modulation-first DAW workflow in Bitwig Studio instead of notation-driven drafting in Capella or Forte Notation?
How do notation views and playback loops differ between GarageBand and Guitar Pro for MIDI edits after recording?
Which tool is more suitable for rack-driven sound design where sequencing and staff playback must stay connected in one project?
How does AI-assisted drafting in AIVA interact with manual refinement in the notation and MIDI workflow?
What admin controls and security considerations matter when composition software is used by multiple collaborators?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Top 10 Best Turntables Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Turn Table Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Tuned Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Treble Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transposition Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transposing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transposing Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transpose Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transcription Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transcribing Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Transcribe Guitar Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Trance Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Trance Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Track Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Track Mixing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Touchscreen Jukebox Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Tone Generator Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Toby Fox Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Deejaying Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Deejay Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→