GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Composers Software of 2026
Top 10 composers software ranked for music creators with Sibelius, Dorico, and Finale comparisons plus tools like LilyPond and Noteflight.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
LilyPond is the best fit when you need printed-score iteration with reproducible layout, whereas Noteflight suits teams that value web collaboration and MusicXML exchange, and REAPER is a smart budget pick if you want one timeline for MIDI orchestration plus audio production.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
LilyPond
Engraving rules are generated from text input, producing consistent typography across repeated builds.
Built for fits when printed score iteration and reproducible layout matter more than real-time playback..
Noteflight
Editor pickReal-time collaborative score editing with web-native sharing and review workflows.
Built for fits when web collaboration and MusicXML-based exchange matter more than advanced engraving fine-tuning..
PreSonus Notion
Editor pickScore-integrated playback updates articulation and instrument mapping as notation changes.
Built for fits when composers want notation-led composition with reliable rehearsal playback and MusicXML export..
Comparison Table
LilyPond
SMBText-based music engraving program producing high-quality printed scores.
Engraving rules are generated from text input, producing consistent typography across repeated builds.
LilyPond compiles music notation from a declarative input language into high-control engraving output, including beam grouping, slur positioning, and consistent line breaking. The project’s strength is source-level automation, because changes in the input propagate through the entire score render. It also supports exporting notation formats like MusicXML for interchange, which helps when collaboration requires editing in other notation tools.
A practical tradeoff is that playback and DAW-style MIDI sequencing are not the focus, so sustained audition workflows may feel slower than in notation editors with integrated performance. LilyPond fits composers who iterate on printed layout and want repeatable score rendering driven by text input, especially when generating multiple parts from shared music sources.
- +Deterministic score rendering for reproducible printed output
- +Text-first input enables scripted changes and version-controlled notation
- +Powerful engraving control for spacing, beams, and slur placement
- +MusicXML export supports notation interchange with other editors
- –Playback is not designed for DAW-grade audition and mixing
- –Learning the input language and layout idioms takes time
- –Interactive WYSIWYG editing is limited compared with GUI notation editors
Composers using version control
Iterate scores through Git commits
Reproducible printed editions
Orchestration editors
Generate multiple instrument parts
Faster part production
Show 2 more scenarios
Notation teams exchanging files
Move drafts into other editors
Lower interchange friction
MusicXML export supports round-tripping when collaborators prefer different notation workflows.
Academic engraving workflows
Publish notation from standard templates
Uniform document style
Reusable engraving settings support consistent staff layout across publications.
Best for: Fits when printed score iteration and reproducible layout matter more than real-time playback.
Noteflight
SMBWeb-based music notation software for composing and teaching music.
Real-time collaborative score editing with web-native sharing and review workflows.
Noteflight’s core workflow is web-first score writing with a notation grid, staff tools, and playback that responds to changes as edits are made. The collaboration model supports shared access to a score for multiple editors and reviewers, which reduces version churn during arranging and classroom use. Export to MusicXML supports round-tripping with notation editors that accept that format, and printable score output supports study and rehearsal workflows.
A key tradeoff is that deep orchestration and advanced engraving controls are not as granular as in desktop-first notation suites. Noteflight works well when the primary goal is readable scores plus fast feedback loops through web sharing and playback, rather than highly specialized engraving automation.
- +Browser-based editing removes OS and file-sync friction
- +Shared score access supports real-time co-writing and review
- +MusicXML export supports interoperability with desktop notation tools
- +Instant notation playback supports quick musical checks
- –Advanced engraving control depth is limited versus desktop notation suites
- –Large, highly instrumented projects can feel constrained
Composition teachers
Assign scores for student feedback
Faster revision cycles
Small composer teams
Co-write arrangements in one score
Less version fragmentation
Show 2 more scenarios
Scene and theater writers
Produce rehearsal-ready printable parts
More consistent rehearsals
Scores can be exported for printing while playback supports cue timing checks before rehearsals.
Indie arrangers
Round-trip with desktop notation tools
Reduced format friction
MusicXML exchange supports moving work between Noteflight and other notation environments for final detailing.
Best for: Fits when web collaboration and MusicXML-based exchange matter more than advanced engraving fine-tuning.
PreSonus Notion
enterpriseNotation software combining traditional scoring with realistic playback.
Score-integrated playback updates articulation and instrument mapping as notation changes.
Notion is built around score-based composition where MIDI input and notation editing stay in sync, which reduces round-trip friction versus tools that treat playback as secondary. Its playback engine uses an instrument and articulation setup so staff edits update what is heard during notation playback. Export options include MusicXML for score exchange and MIDI file output for performance continuity.
A tradeoff appears when teams need deep automation through scripting or external systems, because extensibility is oriented around built-in workflows rather than broad API access. Notion fits most when composers want rehearsal-grade playback from their score and need reliable score export for arrangement handoff.
- +Playback settings follow staff edits for faster rehearsal iterations
- +MusicXML export supports score handoff to notation pipelines
- +MIDI-centric workflow keeps performance and notation aligned
- +Instrument and articulation mapping supports realistic audition playback
- –External automation depends on built-in features more than code-based extensibility
- –Large template libraries require consistent setup to avoid playback drift
- –Workflow can feel notation-first even when composing via MIDI
Film and game composers
Rehearse cues from staff edits
Faster cue iteration
Commercial music arrangers
Handoff parts via MusicXML
Cleaner downstream editing
Show 1 more scenario
Producer-composers
Create from MIDI then engrave
One workflow from demo
Start with MIDI sequencing and convert ideas into notation with consistent part behavior.
Best for: Fits when composers want notation-led composition with reliable rehearsal playback and MusicXML export.
Flat
SMBCollaborative online music notation software for real-time score editing.
Browser-first score editing with immediate playback feedback tied to the same notation canvas.
Flat is an online notation editor built for composing and engraving inside a browser. Its core workflow centers on real-time score editing with notation input, layout controls, and playback tied to the edited score.
Flat also supports file exchange through common formats and lets projects stay organized for collaboration-oriented workstreams. For composers who want quick iteration on staff layout and playback behavior without switching tools, Flat’s browser-first workflow reduces friction.
- +Browser-based editing keeps score changes visible without desktop sync steps
- +Notation input and layout controls are tightly coupled to the score view
- +Playback follows edits closely for rapid checking of rhythm, voices, and dynamics
- +Project files remain shareable as a working score artifact
- –Advanced engraving controls can feel shallow for highly customized rule sets
- –Large orchestral scores can become sluggish compared with desktop editors
- –Deep automation across multiple scores needs more workflow discipline
- –External MIDI routing and audio-bounce workflows are less direct than DAW-centric setups
Best for: Fits when browser-native score editing and near-real-time playback checks matter more than extreme engraving customization.
Capella
SMBMusic notation software popular in European markets for choir and ensemble scores.
Engraving rulesets that preserve layout decisions while iterating, reducing manual reformatting between drafts.
Capella is a composing environment that targets fast score-first workflows, with built-in playback and notation editing focused on repeatable layout decisions. It provides engraving rulesets, staff and voice controls, and expression handling aimed at keeping rendered notation consistent during iteration.
Capella also supports file interchange workflows through MusicXML export and MIDI file output so projects can travel between notation, DAW, and collaboration tools. Capella’s differentiator is its automation around engraving choices and playback mapping for multi-part writing rather than treating notation and MIDI as separate deliverables.
- +Engraving rules keep spacing and staff layout consistent across edits
- +Expression and playback mapping helps keep notation and audition aligned
- +MusicXML export supports round-tripping to notation and DAW toolchains
- +Voice and part management reduces rework during multi-part revisions
- –Workflow depends on setup of per-project playback and mapping choices
- –Advanced MIDI sequencing tasks feel less deep than DAW-first editors
- –Some complex notation edge cases require manual tweaks to match expectations
- –Extensibility centers on built-in features rather than third-party plugin ecosystems
Best for: Fits when score-first composition needs repeatable engraving behavior and consistent playback.
Finale
professionalLong-established notation software for composers and educators.
Document-wide engraving rules and saved appearance settings that keep staff layout consistent across large multi-part scores.
Finale targets composers who need edit control over staff layout, engraving rules, and a mature notation workflow built around mature file exchange. Score engraving and notation playback are driven by detailed score settings, part extraction, and repeatable appearance choices tied to the document.
Finale supports MusicXML export and MIDI file workflows for moving between notation editing and MIDI sequencing. It also supports automation through saved expressions, playback setups, and reusable libraries that reduce rework across projects.
- +Deep control over staff layout and engraving rules per document and part
- +Strong MusicXML export for exchanging scores with other notation tools
- +Playback configuration that maps notation to articulations and dynamics
- +Reusable libraries for expressions and common engraving decisions
- –Large feature surface makes first-time setup and workflows slower
- –Advanced engraving changes can require careful step-by-step configuration
- –Interchange with MIDI sequencing can need manual cleanup after import
- –Some layout outcomes depend on document-wide settings that affect many objects
Best for: Fits when notation work needs fine engraving control and reliable exchange via MusicXML between tools.
Logic Pro
desktop DAWLogic Pro combines MIDI sequencing, audio recording, notation, mixing, and instrument libraries.
Apple loops plus MIDI and audio recording feed the same arrangement, keeping reharmonization and orchestration edits synchronized.
Logic Pro differentiates itself with deep macOS and Apple ecosystem integration plus a composition workflow built around audio-to-MIDI iteration. It supports MIDI sequencing, audio routing with bus-based mixing, and extensive automation for both virtual instruments and external gear via controller mapping.
Notation work is handled through a score editor with export paths to common interchange formats, and playback stays tightly coupled to the arrangement timeline. Compared with Sibelius, Dorico, and Finale, Logic Pro trades notation-first editing depth for a unified DAW environment that keeps tracking, production, and composition moves in one project.
- +Tight MIDI sequencing to audio iteration inside one project timeline
- +Expression mapping and articulation control for instrument playback realism
- +Audio routing and bus architecture that supports complex mix workflows
- +Score editor stays linked to arrangement playback for faster edits
- –Notation engraving controls are less extensive than notation-first editors
- –External MIDI controller mapping can become configuration-heavy on larger rigs
Best for: Fits when composing in a DAW first and needing notation plus production in one timeline.
FL Studio
desktop DAWFL Studio combines pattern sequencing, piano roll composition, audio recording, mixing, and plugin hosting.
Pattern-based sequencing with mixer-linked automation lets MIDI ideas stay connected to audio effects throughout arrangement.
FL Studio pairs an event-focused MIDI sequencer with dense audio routing and a built-in VST plugin host.
The arrangement workflow centers on step sequencing, pattern workflows, and mixer-driven audio and FX chains.
Core composing outputs include MIDI file handling, audio bounce for finished mixes, and MusicXML export with instrument and part mapping.
For notation-based work, FL Studio supports limited score display compared with dedicated notation editors, so composition often stays inside MIDI and the audio engine.
- +Mixer-first audio routing keeps automation tied to FX and bus paths
- +Step sequencing and piano roll editing support fast rhythmic sketching
- +Per-pattern and per-clip workflows reduce friction for loop-based composing
- +Built-in plugin hosting supports multitrack instrument and effect chains
- –Score engraving and staff layout controls are weaker than dedicated notation tools
- –Large projects can feel harder to administer across many instruments and versions
- –Automation targets can require careful lane management to stay readable
- –Notation workflows depend on export and mapping rather than full editorial control
Best for: Fits when writing compositions in MIDI and sound first, with light export to notation.
REAPER
SMBREAPER is a configurable DAW for MIDI sequencing, audio recording, routing, editing, and mixing.
Script-driven automation that maps composer workflows into repeatable actions across MIDI, audio, and routing.
REAPER provides a full DAW environment for MIDI sequencing and audio recording, with automation envelopes that composers can shape per track and per parameter.
VST plugin hosting and configurable routing let orchestration cues move through instrument chains and bus processing before playback or export.
Notation workflows can support engraving-related output through notation-oriented features and MusicXML export for exchange with notation editors.
Sibelius, Dorico, and Finale remain stronger for score-first layout and notation-centric editing, while REAPER is a production timeline for composition to cue deliverables.
- +Extensible workflow with REAPER scripts and macros for repeatable composition tasks
- +High-granularity MIDI editing with per-event control and dense automation lanes
- +Flexible audio routing with track and bus architecture for complex cue mixes
- +Efficient audio bounce workflow through customizable render settings
- –Notation authoring is not score-first, so engraving-heavy edits cost more time
- –Deep configuration options can slow onboarding for MIDI-first composers
- –Plugin hosting depends on third-party instruments and effects for final sound
- –Cross-app interchange needs manual attention for consistent formatting
Best for: Fits when composers need one timeline for MIDI orchestration, cue playback, and audio production without switching tools.
SmartScore
vertical specialistSmartScore provides optical music recognition, notation editing, MIDI playback, and MusicXML conversion.
Tight MIDI input to notation output loop with playback for rapid auditioning during score drafting.
SmartScore from musitek.com is a composers-focused desktop tool aimed at turning MIDI sketching into notation-ready scores. It supports MIDI input and score export workflows, plus performance-oriented playback so composers can audition ideas before engraving polish.
The software is oriented around structured score building rather than purely audio production, with notation layout that reflects musical timing and phrasing decisions. SmartScore fits composers who want a repeatable path from MIDI sequencing to readable notation and back to auditioning.
- +MIDI-to-notation workflow supports composer iteration from sketch to score
- +Notation playback helps validate phrasing before final engraving passes
- +Score export supports interchange with notation editors and DAWs
- +Editing tools map musical structure more directly than DAW-only approaches
- –Not as deep in large-scale engraving rule control as Dorico or Sibelius
- –Workflow depends on MIDI preparation quality to avoid messy notation output
- –Limited orchestration-scale tooling compared with full-featured notation suites
- –Automation and batch processing are less extensive than in top-tier competitors
Best for: Fits when MIDI sketches must convert into readable notation quickly for review and revision.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music and audio, LilyPond stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right composers software
This buyer’s guide covers composers software built for score drafting and playback-driven revision, with LilyPond at the top of the short list and Sibelius, Dorico, and Finale used as the desktop notation benchmarks. The remaining coverage spans Noteflight, Flat, PreSonus Notion, Capella, Logic Pro, FL Studio, REAPER, and SmartScore, so notation-first and production-first workflows are both represented.
The ranking emphasis follows repeatable output, collaboration and exchange workflows, and how tightly notation edits drive playback. Each entry is grounded in concrete mechanisms like deterministic score rendering in LilyPond and browser-canvas playback feedback in Flat so comparisons map to real composer tasks.
Composers software for score engraving plus MIDI and playback iteration
Composers software is used to write notation, control engraving and layout behavior, and validate musical phrasing through notation playback and MIDI workflows. Tools like LilyPond focus on deterministic engraving from text input so repeated builds reproduce typography and spacing consistently across iterations.
Desktop notation suites like Finale prioritize document-wide engraving rules and saved appearance settings that keep multi-part layout consistent. Music-first environments like Logic Pro and REAPER instead align MIDI sequencing and audio production on one timeline, with notation support that trades engraving depth for tighter orchestration-to-audio iteration.
Composer workflow features that change output quality and iteration speed
The fastest composers move between notation edits and audition, because playback settings that follow score changes reduce rehearsal rework. The ranking emphasizes tools where engraving behavior stays consistent across repeated builds, or where browser-native editing keeps the score canvas and audio feedback synchronized.
Deterministic engraving from script or text-first input
LilyPond generates engraving rules from text input so repeated builds reproduce typography and spacing consistently across revisions. This approach is typically more reproducible than canvas-first browser editors like Flat for the same repeated layout goals.
Document-wide engraving rules for large multi-part consistency
Finale stores engraving rules and appearance settings per document so staff layout stays consistent across large scores. Dorico and Sibelius target similar desktop expectations, but Finale’s document-wide saved controls are the clearest match to multi-part layout stability.
Score-integrated playback that updates with notation edits
PreSonus Notion links playback settings to staff edits so rehearsal playback reflects notation changes as the score evolves. SmartScore also supports a quick MIDI-to-notation audition loop, but Notion’s approach is notation-led and designed for rehearsal iteration.
Browser-native editing with immediate playback checks
Flat keeps notation input and layout controls tightly coupled to the score view while providing near-real-time playback feedback. Noteflight also runs in the browser for collaboration, but Flat’s immediate canvas feedback is the sharper fit for fast playback spot checks.
Real-time collaboration and review workflows
Noteflight enables real-time collaborative score editing through web-native sharing and review workflows. It trades off advanced engraving fine-tuning versus desktop suites, which makes collaboration the central differentiator for teams that co-write in one score.
Automation depth across MIDI sequencing and audio production
Logic Pro ties Apple loops plus MIDI and audio recording into one arrangement timeline, which keeps orchestration edits synchronized with audio iteration. REAPER provides script-driven workflow automation across MIDI, audio, and routing, which suits composers who want repeatable actions across sessions.
Choose composers software by workflow control points and iteration loop
A composer choosing software should start with the loop that must be fast and trustworthy, either repeated printed output or rehearsal-ready playback as notation changes. The right choice depends on whether the primary control point is engraving rules stored in a document, browser-canvas feedback tied to live edits, or a DAW timeline where audio and MIDI move together.
Pick the iteration philosophy: reproducible printed output vs real-time audition loops
If repeated builds must yield the same spacing and typography, LilyPond’s deterministic score rendering from text input matches that requirement. If auditions must stay tightly coupled to what is being changed on screen, Flat’s browser-first canvas with immediate playback feedback is a closer fit.
Decide where playback authority lives: notation-led playback or DAW timeline production
If rehearsal playback should update as staff edits change articulation and instrument mapping, PreSonus Notion keeps playback settings aligned to notation changes. If production and orchestration live on one timeline, Logic Pro or REAPER aligns MIDI sequencing with audio iteration.
Select the scaling model: multi-part engraving rules vs orchestration administration overhead
For multi-part document work where engraving rules and saved appearance settings must persist across many parts, Finale’s document-wide controls provide a consistent framework. If large instrument projects feel constrained in the browser, choose a desktop-first option like Finale, Dorico, or Sibelius instead of Noteflight or Flat for day-to-day heavy orchestration.
Choose exchange and review workflows as a first-class requirement
If collaborative co-writing and review are central, Noteflight’s web-native sharing supports real-time editing and comment-style workflows. If handoff to other notation pipelines must be routine, PreSonus Notion’s MusicXML export support and LilyPond’s deterministic builds give more predictable cross-tool outcomes.
Match sketch-to-score conversion needs to the MIDI-to-notation depth available
When MIDI sketches must convert quickly into readable notation for review and revision, SmartScore focuses on a tight MIDI input to notation output loop with notation playback. When draft-to-draft engraving behavior must stay stable as spacing decisions persist, Capella’s engraving rulesets help preserve layout decisions during iteration.
Who these composers software tools fit best
Composers should map their work to the tool’s control points, either engraving rules that protect layout consistency, collaboration workflows that keep teams in one shared score, or timeline-driven production that unifies MIDI and audio. The segments below target concrete workflow outcomes rather than generic user levels.
Composers who iterate on printed layout and want reproducible typography across builds
LilyPond fits when deterministic score rendering must preserve spacing and typography from repeated text-driven builds, reducing manual cleanup between drafts.
Composers running co-writing and review with collaborators who need web-native access
Noteflight fits when real-time collaborative score editing and browser-native sharing reduce file-sync friction and keep reviewers working in the same score.
Notation-led composers who need rehearsal playback to reflect staff edits immediately
PreSonus Notion fits when playback settings follow staff edits so articulation and instrument mapping stay aligned during rehearsal iterations.
Composers producing audio-first arrangements while still keeping notation as a controlled output
Logic Pro fits when a DAW timeline drives orchestration and reharmonization while MIDI and audio recording stay synchronized with notation output.
Composers who convert MIDI sketches into readable notation for quick validation
SmartScore fits when a tight MIDI-to-notation audition loop helps validate phrasing before deeper engraving passes are applied.
Common selection mistakes that create avoidable rework
Most rework comes from picking a tool that optimizes the wrong control point, such as treating a notation editor like a DAW or treating a DAW like a score engraving system. The mistakes below show where composers typically lose time based on the tools’ stated strengths and limitations.
Assuming a notation-first tool will provide DAW-grade auditioning and mixing workflow
LilyPond prioritizes deterministic printed output and makes playback a secondary concern, so it is best paired with a playback-driven audition workflow instead of expecting DAW mixing depth inside the engraving system.
Choosing browser collaboration without planning for engraving fine-tuning on complex scores
Noteflight supports real-time collaboration but has limited advanced engraving control depth versus desktop notation suites, so complex layout work should be scheduled for a desktop tool when the score demands it.
Skipping setup discipline for template libraries and playback mapping in notation-led projects
PreSonus Notion can update playback with staff edits, but large template libraries require consistent setup to avoid playback drift, so templates and instrument mapping should be validated early.
Overloading desktop-first engraving workflows into a score view that becomes sluggish for large orchestral layouts
Flat provides near-real-time playback tied to the score canvas, but large orchestral scores can become sluggish compared with desktop editors, so heavier orchestration sessions may need a desktop notation suite.
Expecting MIDI sketch quality problems to be fixed by the notation tool
SmartScore’s MIDI-to-notation output quality depends on MIDI preparation quality, so quantization and note data cleanup before import prevents messy notation output.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated engraving control fit, playback iteration behavior, and collaboration or exchange workflows across LilyPond, Sibelius, Dorico, Finale, Noteflight, Flat, PreSonus Notion, Capella, Logic Pro, FL Studio, REAPER, and SmartScore. Features counted for 40% because engraving rules control, playback linkage, and MIDI sketch handling drive day-to-day rework.
Ease and value each counted for 30% because learning time affects throughput and dense configuration can slow adoption. LilyPond took the top position because deterministic engraving rules generated from text input produce consistent typography across repeated builds, which directly supports reproducible printed score iteration.
Frequently Asked Questions About composers software
How do Sibelius, Dorico, and Finale differ in built-in engraving control during iteration?
Which notation tools handle real-time browser collaboration best?
When exporting for downstream DAW work, which tools focus on MIDI file workflows versus MusicXML?
What breaks if a MIDI sketch generated in SmartScore needs deterministic, reproducible engraving on every build?
How does REAPER manage automation and routing when composers move between MIDI orchestration and audio bounce?
How do Noteflight and Flat compare for score playback checks during note entry?
Which tools provide structured extensibility through scripts or automation beyond in-app settings?
When importing external notation, where do common MusicXML round-trip issues show up?
How do data migration and admin controls differ between desktop notation tools and browser-based editors?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Top 10 Best Karaoke Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Digital Sound Processor Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Writing Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Write Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Worship Song Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Worship Music Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Wave Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Wav Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Wav Editing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Tuning Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Reverb Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Checking Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Cancellation Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Acting Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocoding Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocoder Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocals Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocals Removing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocal Studio Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocal Synth Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→