
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Cloud Based Network Monitoring Software of 2026
Top 10 cloud based network monitoring software ranked by features and alerts, with comparisons of Datadog, Dynatrace, SolarWinds, and more.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
ThousandEyes is the best fit when you need correlated path insight across internet, SD‑WAN, and cloud dependencies for fast network troubleshooting, whereas Paessler PRTG works better when you want a more hands-on cloud deployment with detailed per-sensor protocol coverage.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ThousandEyes
BGP session visibility tied to path measurements supports routing-aware root cause for WAN and internet issues.
Built for fits when network teams need correlated path, DNS, and routing visibility across hybrid and SaaS dependencies..
LogicMonitor
Editor pickEvent-to-action automation using LogicMonitor’s API and alerting workflows with suppression-aware routing.
Built for fits when network teams need governed alerting and automation across hybrid estates without losing topology context..
Datadog
Editor pickTrace-to-monitor and event correlation inside one investigation workflow for network-linked incidents.
Built for fits when network teams collaborate on incident response with application and infrastructure signals..
Related reading
Comparison Table
ThousandEyes
enterpriseCisco-owned network intelligence platform that monitors application and network paths across the internet, SD-WAN, and cloud providers using distributed agents.
BGP session visibility tied to path measurements supports routing-aware root cause for WAN and internet issues.
ThousandEyes runs cloud-based network sensors and can coordinate synthetic probing to measure latency, jitter, and packet loss along observed paths. It maps network topology using routing and discovery inputs so investigations can follow where traffic likely traveled between endpoints. Alerting can be tuned with thresholds and failure criteria so teams can focus on meaningful degradations rather than every transient spike. Governance is handled through workspace and account controls that separate administrative scopes from monitoring observers.
A key tradeoff is that deep, accurate path analysis depends on deploying the right sensors near traffic ingress and egress points. Teams get the best results when they place sensors where routing decisions change, such as between regions or between data center and cloud. For pure host-level metrics and infrastructure saturation models, ThousandEyes can feel limited compared with telemetry systems that specialize in server and container metrics.
- +Path analysis correlates routing context with measured latency and loss
- +Cloud network sensor deployment supports hybrid visibility patterns
- +APIs enable automated provisioning of tests, agents, and alert workflows
- +Synthetic and agent-based measurements share investigation timelines
- –Sensor placement decisions strongly affect troubleshooting accuracy
- –Initial configuration takes time for multi-region and multi-workspace setups
- –Less suited for high-cardinality server metrics and container CPU saturation analysis
- –Large estates can produce many alert candidates without careful tuning
Network operations teams
Diagnose internet path latency spikes
Faster mean time to detect
SRE and platform teams
Validate SaaS reachability and degradation
Earlier detection of customer impact
Show 2 more scenarios
Enterprise security analysts
Monitor hybrid connectivity change impact
Reduced false incident escalations
Topology and sensor telemetry help separate routing regressions from endpoint outages during migrations.
IT governance and admin
Automate monitoring configuration
Consistent deployment across regions
API-driven provisioning keeps sensor and test configuration synchronized with change management.
Best for: Fits when network teams need correlated path, DNS, and routing visibility across hybrid and SaaS dependencies.
More related reading
LogicMonitor
enterpriseSaaS infrastructure monitoring platform that auto-discovers network devices and collects SNMP, WMI, and flow data without on-premises collectors.
Event-to-action automation using LogicMonitor’s API and alerting workflows with suppression-aware routing.
LogicMonitor provides a centralized inventory and monitoring configuration layer that ties together thresholds, alerting, and device or interface relationships across large estates. The alert engine supports suppression patterns and notification policies so recurring events do not dominate mean time to detect workflows. Automation is supported through an API surface that connects monitoring events to ticketing, chat, and runbook actions.
A key tradeoff is that comprehensive coverage depends on aligning collector deployment, credential management, and data source mapping for each environment. It is a strong fit when networks are mixed vendor and mixed platform, including frequently changing WAN and cloud edge paths that require consistent baselining and correlation.
- +API-driven alert actions connect monitoring events to operational workflows
- +Unified alert suppression reduces noise across recurring topology and threshold events
- +Topology-centric views support faster root cause across device relationships
- +RBAC and audit logging support governed monitoring operations
- –High telemetry scope increases collector and credentials management overhead
- –Initial mapping of metrics to alerts takes planning for consistent baselines
- –Some advanced correlations require careful configuration of data sources
- –Automation quality depends on internal runbook and integration maturity
NOC operations teams
Reduce alert storms on WAN links
Lower MTTR for recurring outages
Network engineering teams
Validate capacity and interface behavior changes
Faster change impact triage
Show 2 more scenarios
Platform and security operations
Correlate syslog signals with device health
Earlier detection of anomalous behavior
Log ingestion and alerting policies tie network events to operational incident workflows.
Enterprise IT governance teams
Control who can change monitoring logic
Reduced configuration risk
RBAC and audit visibility support safe configuration changes across teams.
Best for: Fits when network teams need governed alerting and automation across hybrid estates without losing topology context.
Datadog
enterpriseCloud-scale monitoring platform with a dedicated Network Performance Monitoring module that visualizes traffic flows across cloud and on-premises infrastructure.
Trace-to-monitor and event correlation inside one investigation workflow for network-linked incidents.
Datadog supports agent-based telemetry for hosts, containers, and Kubernetes, then correlates those signals with network monitoring views in the same investigations. Network-focused data is typically brought in via integrations and can be mapped into dashboards, monitors, and trace correlation so teams can connect customer impact to network symptoms. The unified data surface makes cross-domain root cause work feasible, such as relating deploy events and service errors to network degradation and latency shifts. Governance is centered on role-based access and audit visibility across spaces, dashboards, and monitor actions.
A practical tradeoff is that deep device-native telemetry often depends on what each integration can ingest and normalize, so coverage can vary across network vendors and collector patterns. Teams get the best results when they treat network signals as part of a broader observability program, not as a standalone NMS replacement. A common fit is correlating north-south and east-west performance changes with service-level latency baselines during incidents.
- +Single investigation view links network symptoms to services and traces
- +Automation API supports monitor creation, updates, and bulk governance
- +Unified dashboards reduce handoffs between network and application teams
- +RBAC and audit trails help control who can edit monitors and alerts
- –Network depth depends on integration coverage per vendor and path
- –Normalization can hide device-specific counters that engineers need
SRE and platform teams
Correlate deploys with network latency spikes
Mean time to detect improves
Network operations teams
Monitor WAN performance by service
Packet loss correlation is faster
Show 2 more scenarios
Security operations teams
Investigate anomalies using unified context
Fewer context switches
Security-relevant events can be examined alongside traffic-related performance indicators.
DevOps automation owners
Manage alert rules via API
Consistent alert configuration at scale
Provision monitors and alert changes programmatically across environments with guardrails.
Best for: Fits when network teams collaborate on incident response with application and infrastructure signals.
More related reading
Paessler PRTG
SMBNetwork monitoring vendor offering PRTG Hosted Monitor as a fully managed cloud deployment alongside its traditional on-premises product.
The PRTG sensor model lets monitoring, thresholds, dependencies, and alert routing be configured at the individual sensor level.
Paessler PRTG delivers cloud-based network monitoring with a sensor-first model for SNMP polling, ICMP checks, and event-driven alerting. It combines live device telemetry with automated alert workflows, including reporting views that map monitoring results to specific hosts, services, and dependencies.
Its configuration supports repeatable templates and controlled deployment into hybrid environments, including on-prem networks and cloud segments. Administrative governance is centered on role-based access to configuration and monitoring views, plus audit visibility for changes.
- +Sensor-first configuration makes per-device tuning granular and auditable
- +Alert notifications can be routed to chat tools, ticketing, and scripts
- +Topology and dependency views help correlate outages across related systems
- +Extensible sensor catalog supports many protocols without custom code
- –High sensor counts can create operational overhead for large estates
- –Some advanced automations require scripting to reach full flexibility
- –Workflow complexity grows quickly when many alerts and dependencies interact
- –RBAC controls are less detailed than enterprise governance suites
Best for: Fits when teams need detailed protocol coverage and alert routing with strong per-sensor control.
Site24x7
SMBZoho-owned cloud monitoring platform with network monitoring capabilities covering SNMP device health, flow analysis, and network path testing.
Network event correlation across reachability checks and syslog-sourced incidents within shared incident views.
Site24x7 provides cloud-based network monitoring with device polling, availability checks, and alerting built around monitoring workflows. The platform combines SNMP polling, TCP and ICMP reachability tests, and syslog forwarding so network and application signals appear in one operations view.
It also supports agentless monitoring across hybrid environments by letting teams add sites and devices without deploying a full monitoring footprint on every host. Administrators can tune alert rules and reporting so detection signals map to operational priorities across networks.
- +One operations console for network reachability, SNMP polling, and alert workflows
- +syslog forwarding centralizes event context for troubleshooting timelines
- +Hybrid-friendly device onboarding supports agentless monitoring patterns
- +Flexible alert configuration supports threshold and condition tuning
- –Topology mapping depth can lag vendors that specialize in automated discovery workflows
- –Large device estates can require careful polling interval planning to control noise
- –Packet capture ingestion depth is limited compared with network-first analysis tools
Best for: Fits when teams need unified network monitoring workflows with agentless onboarding and tuned alerting across hybrid sites.
ExtraHop
enterpriseNetwork detection and response platform delivered as Reveal(x) Cloud, providing real-time L2-L7 visibility into east-west and north-south traffic.
System-generated transaction views that correlate network telemetry with application impact across multiple hops.
ExtraHop targets network operations teams that need cloud-to-hybrid visibility with flow analytics and packet-level context. It collects telemetry from network sensors and surfaces transaction and path views for troubleshooting across east-west and north-south traffic.
The platform supports automation via APIs for configuring sensors, managing detections, and integrating results into external workflows. Administrators can apply role-based access and governance around who can view, query, and act on investigation data.
- +Flow-based investigations connect behavior changes to specific network paths
- +API-driven configuration and data export for detection workflows
- +Transaction views tie latency, loss, and application impact to telemetry
- +RBAC and audit-oriented access separation for investigators and admins
- –Sensor deployment adds operational overhead in each monitored segment
- –Some advanced use cases depend on consistent telemetry coverage design
- –High-cardinality environments can increase query complexity for analysts
- –Investigations may require tuning detections to reduce alert noise
Best for: Fits when network teams need transaction-oriented troubleshooting with automation and controlled access.
More related reading
Domotz
SMBCloud-based network monitoring and mapping tool designed for MSPs and IT departments managing remote site networks.
Topology-aware inventory with configuration change detection built around sensor-collected device context.
Domotz delivers cloud-based network monitoring through a lightweight approach that depends on sensors for data collection rather than full agents. It focuses on visibility for network inventory, health status, and configuration change detection with a centralized console.
The monitoring workflow centers on recurring device polling plus event surfacing so teams can correlate incidents with topology context. Domotz is geared toward multi-site and hybrid environments where on-prem collection needs to feed a SaaS dashboard.
- +Cloud console centralizes device inventory and health views across sites
- +Sensor-based collection reduces host overhead compared with full agents
- +Configuration change detection helps track drift between scans
- +Topology mapping improves navigation from incidents to affected segments
- –Alert customization depth can feel limited versus enterprise monitoring suites
- –Troubleshooting workflows are less granular than flow and packet-centric tools
- –Discovery coverage depends on sensor placement and reachability to devices
- –Long-term trend modeling is not as deep as metric-first monitoring systems
Best for: Fits when multi-site teams need agentless sensor collection and cloud visibility for inventory, health, and change detection.
LiveAction
enterpriseNetwork performance monitoring platform with LiveNX cloud deployment offering flow analysis, WAN monitoring, and path visualization.
LiveAction path and session correlation that ties topology discovery to performance impact across specific routes.
LiveAction delivers cloud-based network monitoring that focuses on end-to-end visibility using active and passive traffic context rather than agent-only telemetry. Core capabilities include traffic discovery, path analysis across routed networks, and performance insights tied to specific flows.
The monitoring workflow emphasizes drill-down from topology to impacted interfaces and sessions, with guided troubleshooting outputs for network incidents. LiveAction also provides integration and automation surfaces for governance, including API-driven configuration and exportable monitoring results.
- +Topology-to-path drill-down reduces time from symptom to root location.
- +Traffic-centric views connect performance impact to specific sessions and routes.
- +API-driven integration supports automated provisioning and data export.
- +Hybrid monitoring patterns fit environments mixing virtual and physical networks.
- –Deep workflow coverage depends on correct network discovery inputs.
- –Less suitable for teams that only need basic SNMP polling dashboards.
- –Automation and integration require operational ownership of monitoring workflows.
- –Advanced correlation views can be harder to interpret without network context.
Best for: Fits when network teams need flow-level troubleshooting and path visibility across hybrid routing domains.
More related reading
New Relic
enterpriseObservability platform with network monitoring features that capture SNMP data and flow records alongside application and infrastructure metrics.
Cross-linking network-adjacent events to application spans inside the same incident context.
New Relic ingests cloud and infrastructure telemetry and turns it into network visibility through integrations with observability agents and data sources. Network-focused workflows rely on configuration of telemetry collection, correlated metrics, and alerting tied to services and hosts.
It works best when network signals are available as platform metrics and enriched events rather than as raw packet streams. Governance and automation come through administrative controls, policy-driven alerting, and an API surface for extending ingestion and operational workflows.
- +Strong correlation between network-adjacent signals and service timelines
- +Automation options through APIs for ingestion and operational workflows
- +Extensive integrations for cloud telemetry and agent-based collection
- +Configurable alerting with routing rules tied to monitored assets
- –Packet-level visibility depends on external capture or network observability add-ons
- –Best results require disciplined tagging so network events map to services
- –Topology mapping is limited compared with dedicated network sensor products
- –High-cardinality network dimensions can stress query performance
Best for: Fits when network monitoring must integrate tightly with service observability and automation.
Catchpoint
enterpriseInternet resilience platform providing network path monitoring, synthetic tests, and BGP visibility from a global probe network.
Synthetic monitoring workflows that connect multi-step transaction failures to routing and dependency context in incident timelines.
Catchpoint focuses on measuring user experience and service performance with synthetic tests and agentless network observability across distributed targets. It supports end-to-end workflow visibility for DNS, web, and API transactions, then ties those measurements to network and routing conditions for faster impact assessment.
Catchpoint also provides alerting logic, reporting views for MTTD and MTTR trends, and integrations that bring telemetry into adjacent observability workflows. Teams use it to compare latency baseline behavior over time and correlate spikes with dependency failures.
- +End-user synthetic monitoring with multi-step transaction checks
- +Correlates synthetic failures with network and routing context
- +Alert suppression and workflow-based notification control
- +Strong integration surface for incident and ops workflows
- –Deeper network telemetry analysis often needs additional instrumentation
- –Synthetic scenario design requires ongoing maintenance as dependencies change
- –Topology mapping fidelity depends on the monitored footprint
- –Correlation timelines can be slower to tune for high-noise environments
Best for: Fits when distributed teams need synthetic transaction monitoring with incident-grade correlation across DNS and web dependencies.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, ThousandEyes stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right cloud based network monitoring software
Cloud based network monitoring software in this guide focuses on routing-aware troubleshooting, hybrid telemetry collection, and automation paths that can be triggered from network events. Coverage starts with ThousandEyes for BGP session visibility tied to path measurements and continues through LogicMonitor, which builds event-to-action automation using its API and alerting workflows with suppression-aware routing.
Datadog supports trace-to-monitor and event correlation inside one investigation workflow for network-linked incidents. SolarWinds is also included alongside tools like Dynatrace, with monitoring experiences aimed at incident correlation across infrastructure and application signals.
Cloud based network monitoring software for hybrid visibility, routing correlation, and API-driven automation
Cloud based network monitoring software collects network telemetry through cloud-delivered monitoring components and correlates it with topology and incident timelines for WAN, hybrid, and SaaS dependencies. ThousandEyes ties BGP session visibility to path measurements, which helps teams connect routing context to measured latency and loss during troubleshooting.
LogicMonitor centers automation by using its API to connect monitoring events to alert actions and operational workflows, then applies unified alert suppression to reduce noise across recurring topology and threshold events. This category also emphasizes governance-ready execution paths such as bulk monitor updates and controlled workflows that depend on how network events are mapped to services.
Cloud telemetry correlation, automation surfaces, and governance controls
Routing-aware troubleshooting depends on correlating path measurements with routing state, and ThousandEyes ties BGP session visibility to path measurements so WAN and internet issues map to routing context. Hybrid network monitoring also depends on how collected signals get stitched into incident timelines, and tools like Datadog link network symptoms to services and traces inside one investigation workflow.
Routing-aware path context for root cause
ThousandEyes connects BGP session visibility with measured latency and loss through path analysis. LiveAction ties topology-to-path drill-down to performance impact across specific routes.
API-driven automation from alert events
LogicMonitor uses its API and alerting workflows to run event-to-action automation with unified alert suppression. Datadog’s automation API supports monitor creation, updates, and bulk governance to keep incident rules consistent.
Incident workflows that cross-link network and application signals
Datadog links network-linked incidents to services and traces in a single investigation view. New Relic cross-links network-adjacent events to application spans inside the same incident context.
Deep control at the sensor and dependency level
Paessler PRTG uses a sensor-first model where thresholds, dependencies, and alert routing are configured per sensor. ExtraHop provides flow-based investigations that correlate behavior changes to specific network paths.
Operational consoles that unify reachability, polling, and log context
Site24x7 provides one operations console for network reachability, SNMP polling, and alert workflows tied to syslog forwarding. Domotz centralizes device inventory and health views in its cloud console using sensor-collected context.
Synthetic transactions mapped to routing and dependency context
Catchpoint runs end-user synthetic workflows and correlates multi-step transaction failures with network and routing context. ThousandEyes focuses on correlated path and routing measurements that align with internet and WAN troubleshooting.
Choose by correlation workflow, automation model, and how network context is governed
Selection starts with the incident workflow goal because tools differ in how they connect topology, routing context, and measured performance into one troubleshooting path. The second split is the automation model because some platforms prioritize API-driven event actions and bulk governance while others emphasize sensor-level tuning and workflow-specific views.
Select routing-first correlation for WAN and internet troubleshooting
If root cause needs routing context, ThousandEyes ties BGP session visibility to measured latency and loss through path analysis. If topology discovery must connect directly to session impact on specific routes, LiveAction offers topology-to-path drill-down tied to performance impact.
Pick API-first governance for alert-to-automation workflows
If monitoring rules must feed governed operational actions, LogicMonitor runs event-to-action automation via its API with suppression-aware routing workflows. If teams need fast monitor lifecycle management and consistent governance, Datadog provides an automation API for monitor creation, updates, and bulk governance.
Decide between investigation links across app traces or network-focused telemetry depth
If incident handling requires one investigation view that links network symptoms to services and traces, Datadog’s trace-to-monitor and event correlation fits the workflow. If troubleshooting is transaction-oriented with controlled access and flow investigations, ExtraHop provides flow-based investigations that connect behavior changes to network paths.
Choose sensor-level tuning when alert routing must be granular per device
If engineers want alert routing and thresholds controlled per protocol sensor, Paessler PRTG’s sensor-first configuration enables granular tuning and auditable changes. If topology inventory and change detection are the primary operational needs, Domotz provides topology-aware inventory with configuration change detection built around sensor-collected device context.
Match incident workflow to how events enter the system
If troubleshooting timelines rely on syslog forwarding tied to reachability and polling, Site24x7 consolidates network reachability, SNMP polling, and syslog-sourced incident context in one console. If synthetic failures must map to routing and dependencies in incident timelines, Catchpoint connects multi-step synthetic transaction checks to routing and dependency context.
Common implementation mistakes that break correlation and automation
Many failures come from mismatched telemetry coverage to the correlation workflow the team expects. Some tools also trade sensor count or discovery accuracy for depth, so setup discipline affects troubleshooting outcomes.
Placing sensors without a plan for where path measurements will actually represent the user impact
ThousandEyes notes that sensor placement decisions strongly affect troubleshooting accuracy. LiveAction also ties workflow outcomes to correct network discovery inputs, so topology discovery coverage must be planned.
Creating alerts and automations without mapping monitoring events to the service model used in operations
Datadog’s network depth depends on integration coverage, and normalization can hide device-specific counters engineers need. New Relic requires disciplined tagging so network events map to services inside incident context.
Letting telemetry scope grow without credentials and collector governance
LogicMonitor flags that high telemetry scope increases collector and credentials management overhead. ExtraHop warns that sensor deployment adds operational overhead per monitored segment.
Overloading the environment with excessive sensor counts or per-device tuning beyond the team’s operating capacity
Paessler PRTG warns that high sensor counts can create operational overhead in large estates. Domotz reduces host overhead through sensor-based collection, but alert customization depth can lag enterprise monitoring suites.
Treating synthetic scenarios as a one-time setup instead of a continuously maintained dependency model
Catchpoint notes that synthetic scenario design requires ongoing maintenance as dependencies change. Correlation depth for network analysis can also need additional instrumentation when packet-level detail is not already collected.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated the ten platforms using features, ease, and value with features weighted at 40 percent, ease weighted at 30 percent, and value weighted at 30 percent. ThousandEyes set the ranking baseline because BGP session visibility is tied directly to path measurements through routing-aware path analysis for WAN and internet troubleshooting.
LogicMonitor ranked highly because its API-driven event-to-action automation works with unified alert suppression and keeps topology context from degrading into noise. Datadog ranked highly because trace-to-monitor and event correlation links network symptoms to services and traces inside one investigation workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions About cloud based network monitoring software
How do ThousandEyes and Catchpoint compare for correlating routing signals with user experience outcomes?
Which platform is better for event-to-action automation using monitoring APIs: LogicMonitor or Datadog?
What data migration work is required to move existing SNMP and syslog monitoring into LogicMonitor or Paessler PRTG?
When do network teams choose ExtraHop over agentless polling tools like Domotz?
How does RBAC governance differ between ExtraHop and Paessler PRTG for day-to-day administration?
What breaks if a monitoring strategy depends on only SNMP polling and skips flow telemetry: LiveAction or ExtraHop?
How do throughput and latency investigations work differently in Datadog versus Catchpoint?
Which tool is better for topology mapping and path analysis in hybrid routing domains: LiveAction or ThousandEyes?
How do integrations and APIs typically differ between ExtraHop and New Relic when extending monitoring workflows?
When should teams use Site24x7 instead of LogicMonitor for agentless onboarding across multiple sites?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→