Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Children Educational Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Education Learning

Top 10 Best Children Educational Software of 2026

Compare children educational software options for kids, with clear tradeoffs and fit notes to help families choose programs like ABCmouse.

20 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Parents, teachers, and education operators use children educational software to keep daily practice measurable while matching content to age and skill level. This comparison focuses on the tradeoffs between guided early literacy, curriculum-aligned math drills, and creative coding systems that vary by engagement mechanics, assessment depth, and support for at-home versus classroom use.

Tynker is the best choice for schools that want hands-on coding projects because its browser editor guides step-by-step challenges that turn into runnable games right away, whereas IXL is better for families or teachers needing standards-aligned reading and math practice with skill diagnostics.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Tynker

A browser-based editor with guided coding challenges that outputs playable projects immediately after each step.

Best for: Fits when schools want coding-focused learning activities with a hands-on project workflow.

2

ABCmouse

Editor pick

Built-in learning path that sequences reading and math mini-lessons by skill stage with immediate corrective responses.

Best for: Fits when families or small classrooms need guided early literacy and math practice with child-friendly feedback.

3

Duolingo ABC

Editor pick

Sound-to-letter exercises that adapt by sending learners back through the exact activity type they struggled with.

Best for: Fits when families want daily, low-friction early reading practice with light adult oversight.

Comparison Table

1
TynkerBest overall
vertical specialist
9.1/10
Overall
2
vertical specialist
8.7/10
Overall
3
vertical specialist
8.6/10
Overall
4
vertical specialist
8.3/10
Overall
5
vertical specialist
8.0/10
Overall
6
vertical specialist
7.7/10
Overall
7
vertical specialist
7.6/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.1/10
Overall
9
vertical specialist
6.9/10
Overall
10
6.5/10
Overall
#1

Tynker

vertical specialist

Tynker teaches children programming through coding courses, game projects, robotics, and Minecraft activities.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

A browser-based editor with guided coding challenges that outputs playable projects immediately after each step.

Tynker turns kid-friendly coding into interactive lessons that generate and run projects directly inside a web editor. It offers curriculum-like pathways for creating games, animations, and app-style experiences, plus blocks-to-text transitions for languages such as Python and JavaScript.

The platform also includes shareable projects that support peer viewing and iteration, which fits classroom practice better than worksheets alone. Compared with other learning tools in this category, Tynker’s core differentiator is the project-first workflow paired with guided challenges that keep learners building rather than just completing quizzes.

Pros
  • +Project-first lessons produce runnable games and animations in the same workspace
  • +Blocks-to-code progression helps learners move toward Python and JavaScript
  • +Built-in sharing supports classroom discussion and iterative improvements
  • +Coding challenges provide stepwise guidance that reduces blank-page time
Cons
  • –Curriculum depth in non-coding subjects is limited compared with math or literacy programs
  • –Some advanced activities need careful supervision to prevent rushed copy-and-editing
Use scenarios
  • Children and classroom coding groups

    Build playable games from sprites

    Playable games show programming concepts

  • Parents and children

    Follow guided coding practice at home

    Learners stay on a path

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Creative coding classes and families

    Program animation stories with characters

    Stories become shareable projects

    Learners create animated scenes and motion sequences by programming character behavior for shareable story projects.

  • Elementary and middle-school educators

    Introduce coding through short projects

    Concepts practice through working builds

    Teachers assign guided block-based activities that introduce programming logic through interactive creations.

Best for: Fits when schools want coding-focused learning activities with a hands-on project workflow.

#2

ABCmouse

vertical specialist

ABCmouse provides structured early-learning lessons, activities, games, and assessments for children.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Built-in learning path that sequences reading and math mini-lessons by skill stage with immediate corrective responses.

ABCmouse blends an early-childhood learning path with game-based activities across literacy, numeracy, art, music, and science. The content uses levels, frequent practice loops, and immediate feedback to keep activities aligned to a learner’s stage.

Parent-facing progress views emphasize completed lessons, accuracy, and skill progress across reading and math. In administration, teacher and parent accounts support classroom or at-home routines but remain light on district-grade integration controls.

Pros
  • +Clear early-childhood learning path with staged literacy and math skills
  • +Frequent rewards and feedback tied to skill practice
  • +Parent progress views track lesson completion and skill growth
  • +Large library of short activities across multiple subject themes
Cons
  • –Limited reporting depth compared with classroom management systems
  • –Course scope focuses on early grades more than later standards
  • –Integration options are not designed for complex district LMS deployments
  • –Customization outside the built-in paths is limited
Use scenarios
  • Young learners with limited coaching

    Complete short tablet activities with audio

    Practice runs with less supervision

  • Preschool and kindergarten families

    Practice counting and adding core numbers

    Numeracy improves through repeated practice

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Teachers and caregivers of learners

    Target extra literacy or math practice

    More practice on weak skills

    Adults direct children toward repeated activities in areas that need additional work using skill-focused practice loops.

  • Parents and caregivers

    Do a sequenced phonics routine

    More consistent decoding practice

    Caregivers follow ordered phonics and early reading activities to practice letter-sound mapping and decoding.

Best for: Fits when families or small classrooms need guided early literacy and math practice with child-friendly feedback.

#3

Duolingo ABC

vertical specialist

Duolingo ABC teaches early reading through phonics, letter practice, and short literacy activities.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Sound-to-letter exercises that adapt by sending learners back through the exact activity type they struggled with.

Duolingo ABC organizes instruction into letter and sound activities with immediate feedback after each attempt. The exercises include spelling by selecting letters, matching sounds to words, and listening-based prompts that keep children engaged for brief sessions. Progress is presented in a way parents can observe, with completed activities and skill movement shown as the child advances through levels.

A key tradeoff is that Duolingo ABC is most effective for early decoding and foundational literacy rather than sustained reading practice for advanced grades. It works best when a child can complete short sessions on a computer with a parent or teacher checking that the child is staying on task.

Pros
  • +Early literacy lessons use short interaction cycles and instant feedback
  • +Letter and sound activities support repeated practice without manual grading
  • +Progress tracking is simple for parent review
  • +On-screen prompts reduce reading load during activities
Cons
  • –Content focus stays mainly on early decoding and may not fit older readers
  • –Less guidance for adults beyond activity completion views
  • –Limited visibility into skill-level mastery for instructional planning
Use scenarios
  • Families supporting preschoolers

    Build letter-sound routine at home

    Improved letter recognition

  • Reading intervention tutors

    Repetition for decoding gaps

    More consistent decoding

Show 1 more scenario
  • Teachers planning home practice

    Assign foundational reading reinforcement

    Fewer handouts needed

    Homework can be monitored as completion and advancement through early stages.

Best for: Fits when families want daily, low-friction early reading practice with light adult oversight.

#4

Osmo

vertical specialist

Osmo combines tablet software with physical pieces for learning games in math, spelling, drawing, and coding.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Real-world object interaction scored through computer vision using the Osmo camera and kit materials.

Osmo’s core loop depends on a camera-driven activity view where the app prompts learners to perform a visible action that the system then scores. Early literacy coverage includes letter and phonics-style mechanics, while early numeracy coverage includes counting and problem solving tied to tangible play. Progress tracking is surfaced to adults through dashboards that show completion and performance outcomes by skill area.

Pros
  • +Camera-based play turns blocks and writing into scored learning tasks
  • +Skill-focused activity library for early literacy and early numeracy practice
  • +Adult dashboards summarize learner performance across activities
  • +Guided sessions structure practice into repeatable routines
Cons
  • –Camera setup and lighting can affect recognition accuracy
  • –Physical kits create more friction than app-only learning tools
Use scenarios
  • Early childhood educators

    Daily station-based literacy practice

    More consistent practice cycles

  • Parents at home

    Guided phonics and counting games

    Higher engagement during routines

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Intervention specialists

    Targeted early numeracy drills

    Clearer skill-area progress

    Specialists assign focused activities and monitor skill performance over time.

  • Classrooms with learning stations

    Center rotation with physical prompts

    Lower friction during rotations

    Students complete visible tasks that are recognized by the app without typed input.

Best for: Fits when classrooms need short, kit-based literacy and numeracy practice with visible learner actions.

#5

Starfall

vertical specialist

Starfall offers interactive early-learning activities focused on reading, phonics, mathematics, and music.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Letter-to-sound and word-building games that reuse the same skill pattern across multiple activities.

Starfall’s core materials center on literacy skills from letter recognition through early reading, using interactive stories and practice screens that keep tasks tightly scoped. Progress tracking supports parent and teacher review of completed activities and skill practice patterns. Printable worksheets and leveled reading activities add an offline option for practice away from the device.

Pros
  • +Skill-scaffolded phonics and word building with short practice loops
  • +Printable worksheets support device-free reinforcement
  • +Interactive stories reinforce early reading comprehension
  • +Progress visibility for parent and classroom review
Cons
  • –Limited coverage beyond early literacy and foundational decoding
  • –Assessment depth is narrower than full learning management systems
Use scenarios
  • Elementary literacy interventionists

    Target decoding gaps in small groups

    More consistent decoding accuracy

  • Parents coaching early readers

    Run daily reading practice at home

    Improved reading confidence

Show 1 more scenario
  • Kindergarten teachers

    Supplement classroom literacy centers

    More time on targeted skills

    Students rotate through phonics activities while the teacher reviews completion and skill repetition patterns.

Best for: Fits when early readers need structured phonics practice with printable reinforcement.

#6

Lingokids

vertical specialist

Lingokids provides play-based English learning activities for young children.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Character-led, spoken interaction games that reinforce phonics through audio prompts during play.

Lingokids combines an early-childhood learning app with animated characters that guide literacy, numeracy, and phonics practice through short activities. Content is organized as kid-paced quests with immediate feedback, and it emphasizes spoken interaction alongside touch-based games.

Pros
  • +Short, character-driven activities fit frequent early-learner sessions
  • +Phonics and letter-focused games pair audio prompts with interaction
  • +Parent progress views track activity completion and engagement signals
  • +Kid-friendly UI reduces friction for independent practice
Cons
  • –Limited evidence of classroom administration workflows like bulk assignment
  • –Data signals emphasize activity completion over detailed mastery traces
  • –Subject coverage is strongest for early literacy and numeracy than later grades
  • –Curriculum mapping depth is less visible than in management-focused platforms
Use scenarios
  • Parents managing screen time

    Run short guided device sessions

    Less planning, more guidance

  • Preschool caregivers

    Reinforce early literacy with stories

    More sound and word practice

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Families seeking spoken practice

    Repeat simple English in story prompts

    More chances to use English

    Children respond to audio or video prompts and repeat language within story-led activities for guided speaking practice.

  • Parents supporting young English learners

    Complete daily English listening and speaking

    A repeatable early English routine

    Children follow short guided activities that combine listening, vocabulary, phonics, and speaking prompts.

Best for: Fits when parents need early literacy and numeracy practice with guided, game-like routines.

#7

Scratch

vertical specialist

Scratch lets children create and share interactive stories, games, and animations with block-based code.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Remix from shared projects encourages learners to modify real examples instead of starting from blank screens.

Scratch is a web-based creative coding environment where children build interactive stories, games, and animations with drag-and-drop blocks.

Pros
  • +Drag-and-drop blocks make events, loops, and variables visible
  • +Remix workflows support iterative learning from shared projects
  • +Project sharing provides a clear audience for creative motivation
  • +Browser-based access reduces device setup barriers
Cons
  • –No built-in teacher dashboard for standards-based tracking
  • –Limited automation for class provisioning and role management
  • –Project artifacts are not packaged in widely used training formats
  • –Community sharing increases moderation workload for adults
Use scenarios
  • Children and creative coding educators

    Create interactive narratives with events

    Stories become playable projects

  • Young learners and families

    Practice by experimenting with tutorials

    Confidence grows through self-directed builds

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Student communities and educators

    Publish work for others to review

    Projects gain shareable feedback

    Creators share projects for others to play and use as a basis for remixing and further development.

  • Teachers and beginner students

    Teach sequencing and control flow with blocks

    Core concepts practice with projects

    Teachers use block-based activities to introduce sequencing, events, variables, and control flow through visible projects.

Best for: Fits when students need creative coding practice with quick, visual feedback and remix-based iteration.

#8

IXL

enterprise

IXL provides curriculum-aligned practice, diagnostics, and analytics across multiple school subjects.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

IXL skill diagnostics and mastery progression maps practice to specific standards-aligned subskills.

IXL pairs thousands of practice items with instant feedback across math, language arts, science, and social studies. The item engine supports skill-by-skill mastery progression and generates detailed performance views for parents and teachers.

Pros
  • +Skill diagnostics and progress views support targeted practice over time
  • +Granular feedback on student work helps reduce repeated mistakes
  • +Broad curriculum coverage spans core subjects with aligned skill sets
  • +Parent and teacher views keep goals visible across home and school
Cons
  • –Practice-first design limits depth for inquiry or long-form instruction
  • –Integration and automation depend on external rostering and platform setup
  • –Limited offline delivery can interrupt learning during low connectivity
  • –Administration tooling focuses on assignments and reporting, not workflows
Use scenarios
  • Elementary and middle school teachers

    Run differentiated practice during stations

    More usable classroom time

  • K-12 classroom teachers

    Assign short standards-aligned daily work

    Consistent practice habits form

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Students, parents, and tutors

    Continue learning with assigned practice

    Families see completion and progress

    Families use assigned practice and progress views to keep practicing at home while tracking what gets completed.

  • Language arts and English teachers

    Reassign grammar and reading practice

    Skills improve after targeted repeats

    Departments assign formative skill exercises and review performance at the skill level to target errors again.

Best for: Fits when schools need standards-aligned practice plus reporting for teachers and parents.

#9

Prodigy Math

vertical specialist

Prodigy Math uses role-playing game mechanics to provide curriculum-aligned math practice.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Game-driven progression that adapts math practice while maintaining a teacher dashboard view of skill mastery signals.

Prodigy Math delivers a question-and-reward math game that routes students into practice aligned to grade-level skills. It combines adaptive practice with a teacher dashboard that tracks skill mastery signals across classes, and it includes parent access for viewing progress.

Pros
  • +Narrative gameplay keeps math practice going during short daily sessions
  • +Teacher dashboard groups progress by skill concepts for instructional planning
  • +Adaptive question selection matches practice difficulty to student performance
  • +Parent portal surfaces progress without exposing students to full teacher controls
Cons
  • –Game context can reduce focus for classes that prefer direct problem sets
  • –Skill breakdown reporting can be too high-level for advanced standards micro-coverage
  • –No documented educator automation or API surface for custom systems integration
  • –Classroom setup depends on adding students and managing rosters in-app
Use scenarios
  • Students needing engagement

    Answer quest-based curriculum math questions

    More time on core math

  • Parents and caregivers

    Check student-linked math progress

    Caregivers track practice needs

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Elementary and middle school teachers

    Use game-based activities in rotations

    Focused practice fits rotation time

    Schools run short independent game stations during classroom rotations so students practice focused math in set periods.

  • Elementary students and early programs

    Practice addition through interactive games

    Foundations strengthen in games

    Younger learners work on foundational numeracy areas like addition using interactive game activities.

Best for: Fits when classrooms want game-based math practice plus teacher-visible skill mastery reporting.

#10

Quizlet

SMB

Quizlet provides digital flashcards, practice tests, study activities, and AI-assisted learning features.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Assign ready-made or custom flashcard sets and track completion inside a class workflow.

Quizlet is a children learning site built around flashcards, practice sets, and quick quizzes. Its core workflows include creating or selecting study sets, running timed and mode-based practice, and tracking learner progress inside teacher or class contexts.

Pros
  • +Flashcard and quiz formats support fast retrieval practice for core skills
  • +Assignment flow lets teachers distribute ready-made sets or custom sets
  • +Search and reuse of public sets reduces prep time for common topics
  • +Multiple practice modes keep learners working across question types
Cons
  • –Content quality varies when relying on user-created study sets
  • –Limited evidence of deep curriculum mastery logic compared with adaptive instruction tools
  • –Integrations for classroom systems are not a primary focus
  • –Teacher analytics are narrower than full learning management systems
Use scenarios
  • Students and self-directed learners

    Study synced flashcards on devices

    Study routines stay consistent

  • Training teams and employees

    Reinforce recall of procedures and exceptions

    Operational knowledge gets repeated

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Certification candidates

    Turn question banks into timed review

    Exam prep repeats on schedule

    Candidates reuse outlines or question banks as sets for self-testing and timed practice for definitions and factual questions.

  • Teachers and university courses

    Assign sets for homework review

    Students get common practice materials

    Teachers distribute shared sets for homework, revision, intervention, or short review within course contexts.

Best for: Fits when teachers need quick recall practice and assignable content without building lessons from scratch.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 children educational software, Tynker stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Tynker

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Children Educational Software

How do I choose between Prodigy Math and IXL for daily math practice?
Prodigy Math routes students through adaptive game questions and shows teachers skill mastery signals across classes. IXL uses skill-by-skill mastery progression with detailed performance views and standards-aligned diagnostics.
Which tool provides early literacy practice with minimal setup: Duolingo ABC, Starfall, or Khan Academy?
Duolingo ABC and Starfall both focus on early reading readiness behaviors through short, guided lessons. Khan Academy shifts toward broader instruction and may require more teacher or parent setup to match the child’s exact phonics or readiness level.
What breaks if a classroom needs physical, hands-on inputs instead of touch-only activities?
Osmo depends on its camera and kit materials, so it loses the scored real-world interaction when kits are unavailable. Duolingo ABC and IXL can run purely on-screen, but they do not capture object-level actions the way Osmo does.
How should teachers handle progress visibility for both parents and educators in Prodigy Math versus ABCmouse?
Prodigy Math gives a teacher dashboard with skill mastery signals and also provides parent access to view progress. ABCmouse includes parent-facing progress views and classroom or at-home teacher and parent accounts, but it stays lighter for district-grade integration controls.
Which workflow fits better for teaching coding through built projects: Tynker or Scratch?
Tynker uses a browser-based editor that outputs playable projects after guided challenge steps. Scratch emphasizes remix-based creation inside a shareable community workflow, which can change how projects evolve during instruction.
How does Osmo score learning actions differently than typical app taps?
Osmo uses computer vision on the Osmo camera to score handwriting, blocks, and object interaction with kit materials. Most app experiences, including Lingokids and Quizlet, rely on touch or click responses without camera-based object scoring.
What admin controls and moderation support exist for classroom use in Scratch compared with Quizlet?
Scratch provides basic account tools and moderation support for participation at the community level. Quizlet supports teacher or class contexts so teachers can assign sets and track completion without building lesson content from scratch.
How do adult-facing reporting details differ between IXL and Lingokids?
IXL generates standards-aligned analytics with diagnostics, goal tracking, and performance views for parents and teachers. Lingokids reporting focuses on completion and progress signals, which is less suited to fine-grained assessment workflows.
When does Duolingo ABC’s repetition model become a limitation compared with Khan Academy?
Duolingo ABC routes learners back through the exact activity type the child struggled with during sound-to-letter exercises. Khan Academy can provide broader practice coverage across topics, which reduces the chance of over-repeating one narrow activity type when a learner needs wider content exposure.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Children Educational Software

In children educational software, the biggest differences show up in how well content reacts to a child’s choices and how reliably it records what happened. We recommend checking adaptive learning quality, feedback clarity, and parent progress reporting before committing to a tool.

Adaptive learning behavior

Why it matters

Adaptive learning behavior matters because kids learn at different speeds, and the software should respond in ways that feel fair. When it’s too rigid or too jumpy, progress can stall or frustrate.

How to check

During a demo session, have the child start at a mid-level activity, then intentionally make a few wrong and a few correct choices. Watch whether the next step changes in a reasonable way and stays within age-appropriate content.

Feedback that guides, not just scores

Why it matters

Feedback clarity matters for children because the “why” behind a mistake is what turns practice into learning. If the tool only marks right or wrong, many children will guess and move on.

How to check

Ask the demo to show one wrong answer and one right answer for the same skill. Look for specific explanations or guided hints, plus a way to try again immediately.

Age fit and content variety

Why it matters

Age fit and content variety prevent a tool from feeling repetitive or above a child’s reading and attention level. Good variety also helps keep practice focused on key skills.

How to check

Request examples for at least two age bands and show multiple activity types (for example, stories, interactive problems, and simple challenges). Check that instructions match a child’s reading level and that activities rotate rather than repeating the same format.

Parent progress reporting clarity

Why it matters

Parent progress reporting clarity matters because caregivers need to understand effort and concepts, not just raw completion. Clear reporting supports follow-up practice at home.

How to check

In the demo, switch to a parent view and open one week of activity. Confirm you can see which skills were practiced, trends over time, and what to do next without needing a specialist explanation.

Privacy controls for child accounts

Why it matters

Privacy controls for child accounts matter because families need confidence around what the software collects and who can view it. Lack of control can make adoption harder across households.

How to check

Ask what data is shown in parent views and what can be turned off or limited. Review account management steps: how a parent adds a child, updates settings, and removes access.

Red flags

  • Adaptive learning jumps levels too quickly without explaining why.
  • Feedback only tells the score and doesn’t offer hints or try-again guidance.
  • Parent reporting shows activity time but not skills or actionable next steps.

Fit by situation

  • If you’re buying for a child who struggles to stay challenged, prioritize adaptive learning behavior.
  • If you expect caregivers to support learning at home, prioritize parent progress reporting clarity.
  • If you’re testing for mixed reading levels in one household, prioritize age fit and content variety.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.