GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Cdj Software of 2026
Top 10 Cdj Software ranked for workflow and features. Includes Ableton Live, Logic Pro, and FL Studio picks and tradeoff notes for buyers.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Ableton Live
Session View clip launching combined with Warp and flexible tempo control
Built for live performers needing clip-centric playback with studio-grade editing.
Logic Pro
Editor pickSmart Drums and beat-oriented loop workflow for quick rhythmic arrangement
Built for solo creators needing fast music production and simple mixing in an Apple workflow.
FL Studio
Editor pickPiano Roll MIDI editor with event-level editing and tight quantization controls
Built for producers needing live remixing and rapid pattern switching for CDJ-style sets.
Related reading
Comparison Table
The comparison table contrasts Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, Pro Tools, Reaper, and other CDJ software across integration depth, data model, and automation plus API surface. It also highlights admin and governance controls using concrete signals like schema design, RBAC, audit logs, and extensibility options for provisioning and configuration. The result shows workflow and tradeoffs in how each tool handles synchronization, throughput, and automation workflows across projects and collaborators.
Ableton Live
DAWAbleton Live is a digital audio workstation for composing, recording, and performing music with MIDI and audio tracks plus session and arrangement views.
Session View clip launching combined with Warp and flexible tempo control
Ableton Live stands out for turning performance workflows into a launch-and-arrange hybrid using Session View. It supports DJ-style mixing with tempo tools, audio warping, and flexible clip launching, making it usable as a controller-led playback engine.
Loop-friendly editing, layered sound design in audio and MIDI, and routing options support both live transitions and studio-level sound manipulation. For CDJ software use, its strengths center on fast clip-based playback, tight timing, and extensive in-the-box effects.
- +Session View enables rapid clip launching for DJ-style sets
- +Audio warping keeps tempo alignment for mixed tracks and loops
- +Crossfader and track routing support flexible live transitions
- +Built-in effects like Beat FX integrate with performance workflows
- –Not a dedicated CDJ deck UI, so button-first workflows need setup
- –Track organization can get complex for large libraries during performance
- –Deep routing and device chains require rehearsal to avoid mistakes
Mobile DJs with controller-based sets
Trigger clips while mixing live tempo
Faster transitions and consistent timing
Live remix performers
Rearrange stems during songs
More control over song structure
Show 2 more scenarios
Bedroom producers turning gigs
Convert studio session into CDJ-style playback
Studio-ready performance workflow
Producers map clip launching and effects to perform set pieces with repeatable routing.
Electronic artists using audio warping
Beatmatch mismatched track BPMs
Beatmatched playback without manual edits
Artists use warping and tempo tools to align tracks and keep loops locked during playback.
Best for: Live performers needing clip-centric playback with studio-grade editing
More related reading
Logic Pro
DAWLogic Pro is a macOS music production app that records audio and MIDI, runs built-in and third-party instruments, and mixes with professional effects.
Smart Drums and beat-oriented loop workflow for quick rhythmic arrangement
GarageBand stands out for turning songwriting and podcast-like audio creation into a fast, Apple-native workflow on macOS. It includes virtual instruments, loop-based arrangement, multi-track recording with quantization, and built-in amp and effects for shaping tones. The app also supports mixing tools such as EQ, compression, and reverb automation, making it practical for demos and personal productions.
- +Loop library and smart arrangement speed up track building for new sessions
- +Multi-track recording supports vocals and instruments with quantization controls
- +Integrated amp and pedal effects simplify guitar tone shaping
- –DJJ oriented workflows like advanced deck mixing and live cueing are not a focus
- –Exported project interchange with DAWs can be limited for professional pipeline use
- –Sound design depth is constrained versus full pro production environments
Best for: Solo creators needing fast music production and simple mixing in an Apple workflow
FL Studio
beatmakingFL Studio is a Windows and macOS music production environment focused on pattern-based sequencing with built-in instruments and audio effects.
Piano Roll MIDI editor with event-level editing and tight quantization controls
FL Studio stands out for its tight music production workflow built around the Piano Roll, step sequencer, and pattern-based arrangement. It supports full track creation with MIDI sequencing, audio recording, sample chopping, time-stretching, and extensive built-in virtual instruments.
For CDJ use cases, it can function as a performance deck via its playlist, automation, and clip-like pattern switching, but it is not designed as a dedicated DJ hardware-control system. Its strength is producing and rehearsing tracks with fast editing and a large plugin ecosystem rather than running club-standard DJ cueing and mixing workflows.
- +Pattern-based workflow speeds arrangement for production-driven sets
- +Piano Roll and step sequencer enable rapid MIDI idea capture
- +Built-in synths and effects cover most basic production needs
- –Not a DJ-focused deck UI for rapid cueing and mixing
- –Advanced audio event handling can feel complex during performance
- –Workflow prioritizes composition over live controller-centric mixing
Bedroom producers
Practice DJ set transitions in-session
Tighter set timing
Live electronic performers
Trigger clips and patterns on stage
Consistent live arrangements
Show 2 more scenarios
Content creators
Build radio-ready mixes and stems
Faster remix preparation
Time-stretching and audio recording workflows support stem exports for later DJ-style mixing.
DJ-curious musicians
Prototype cue points using automation
Quicker rehearsal iterations
Automation and event timing enable cue-like control for rehearsal, even without club-standard deck features.
Best for: Producers needing live remixing and rapid pattern switching for CDJ-style sets
More related reading
Pro Tools
pro-audioPro Tools is an audio production workstation for multitrack recording, editing, and mixing with professional-grade workflows and plugins.
Elastic Audio for time-stretching and pitch correction during editing
Pro Tools stands out with deep recording and mixing workflows built around track-based session control and extensive plugin support. Core capabilities include multi-track audio recording, non-destructive editing, and detailed mixing with automation and bussing.
Support for surround formats and high-resolution audio makes it a common fit for studio-grade production. Its performance depends heavily on system configuration and media management for stable session playback.
- +Advanced editing with non-destructive workflows and precise timeline tools
- +Robust automation and routing for studio-grade mixing and signal flow
- +Strong plugin ecosystem for effects, mixing, and mastering workflows
- –Complex session setup and routing can slow new users and quick sessions
- –System performance and I O configuration strongly affect stability and latency
- –Project management and media handling can become tedious on large sessions
Best for: Professional studios needing precise recording, editing, and mixing workflows
Reaper
budget-DAWREAPER is a lightweight multitrack DAW for audio recording, editing, routing, and mixing with extensive customization.
Customizable audio routing and I/O for deck output and monitoring control
Reaper stands out for turning DJ performance files into a configurable CDJ-style playback experience with track, cue, and tempo controls that match live workflows. It delivers core DJ software capabilities like deck playback, cue point management, looping, and sync-oriented timing for multi-track mixing.
The platform also supports controller mapping and fast navigation, which matters for cueing and transitions during sets. Audio routing and output flexibility help it integrate into existing monitoring and PA setups.
- +Highly configurable deck layout with deep cue and loop controls for live mixing
- +Controller mapping flexibility supports hardware-driven performance workflows
- +Robust audio routing options fit complex output and monitoring setups
- –Less guided performance tooling than mainstream DJ apps for quick onboarding
- –Browser and library workflows can feel dense during rapid set preparation
- –Advanced configuration requires careful setup to avoid performance surprises
Best for: Experienced DJs seeking controller-mapped CDJ-style control with deep customization
Studio One
DAWPreSonus Studio One is a DAW that supports recording, editing, mixing, and mastering with included virtual instruments and effects.
Audio Warp and clip-based time-stretching for beat-matched rearrangements
Studio One stands out for its tight integration of recording, mixing, and mastering workflows in a single DAW focused on music production. It delivers multitrack audio recording, non-destructive editing, and robust MIDI sequencing with quantization and controller mapping.
For DJ use, it supports audio playback and cueing, plus drag-and-drop session workflows that can function like a performance timeline. It is best when tracks remain within a DAW session rather than relying on dedicated CDJ-style hardware control.
- +Non-destructive audio editing with clip-based workflow and detailed waveforms
- +Strong MIDI sequencing with quantize tools and controller mapping for performance remixing
- +Integrated effects and routing options for live mixing without external plugins
- –Limited DJ-specific deck and jog-wheel interaction compared with purpose-built DJ software
- –Session timeline workflow can feel slower than immediate dual-deck performance layouts
- –Performance stability depends heavily on project size, plugins, and buffer settings
Best for: Producers DJing via DAW timelines and need deep studio editing during sets
More related reading
Cubase
DAWCubase is a DAW for MIDI sequencing and audio production that provides extensive editing tools, virtual instruments, and mixing features.
Advanced MIDI editing with comprehensive quantize, articulation, and automation tools
Cubase stands out for deep MIDI-first sequencing, strong audio editing, and tight integration between production and mixing. It supports multitrack recording, VST instrument hosting, VST effects, and automation workflows built around its project-centric timeline.
For DJ software use, it can function as a playback and remix workstation via audio import, time-stretching, and controller mapping rather than as a dedicated two-deck interface. The result fits users who want composition and post-production inside the same DAW.
- +Powerful MIDI sequencing with detailed editing and quantization tools
- +High-fidelity audio editing with time-stretch and warp-style workflows
- +Extensive plugin ecosystem via VST instruments and effects hosting
- +Flexible automation lanes for mixing moves and effect parameter changes
- –Not a dedicated DJ deck workflow for fast cueing and playback management
- –Learning curve is steep due to dense routing, track, and mixer options
- –Live performance timelines can feel DAW-centric under rapid transitions
- –Advanced editing tools require careful setup for consistent sync
Best for: Producers using DJ playback needs alongside full recording and remix production
Bitwig Studio
modular-DAWBitwig Studio is a DAW designed for flexible modular-style workflows with deep MIDI capabilities and sound design tools.
Modulation System with Grid-based routing for live, tempo-synced parameter control
Bitwig Studio stands out for combining deep modular sound design with a performance-first workflow for DJs and electronic producers. It provides clip-based launching, flexible routing, and strong MIDI handling for building reusable sets and rapid variations.
Grid-based modulation and extensive effect racks support live sound sculpting without leaving the timeline-driven environment. For CDJ-style control, the session view and hardware integration help translate tactile performance into repeatable arrangements.
- +Grid and modulation tools enable expressive live transformations in-song
- +Clip launching and tempo syncing support performance-ready session workflows
- +Extensive MIDI routing and device control improve hardware-to-software performance mapping
- +Sound design depth with racks and mod sources supports custom DJ effects
- –Learning depth is high for live workflows that rely on advanced routing
- –Mix management can get complex when many devices and modulators run together
- –CDJ-style simplicity is weaker than dedicated DJ applications
Best for: Electronic DJs needing modular sound design plus clip-based live control
More related reading
GarageBand
entry-DAWGarageBand is a music creation app that records audio and MIDI, uses built-in instruments, and supports basic mixing and exporting.
Smart Drums and beat-oriented loop workflow for quick rhythmic arrangement
GarageBand stands out for turning songwriting and podcast-like audio creation into a fast, Apple-native workflow on macOS. It includes virtual instruments, loop-based arrangement, multi-track recording with quantization, and built-in amp and effects for shaping tones. The app also supports mixing tools such as EQ, compression, and reverb automation, making it practical for demos and personal productions.
- +Loop library and smart arrangement speed up track building for new sessions
- +Multi-track recording supports vocals and instruments with quantization controls
- +Integrated amp and pedal effects simplify guitar tone shaping
- –DJJ oriented workflows like advanced deck mixing and live cueing are not a focus
- –Exported project interchange with DAWs can be limited for professional pipeline use
- –Sound design depth is constrained versus full pro production environments
Best for: Solo creators needing fast music production and simple mixing in an Apple workflow
Soundtrap
web-collabSoundtrap is a browser-based collaborative music studio that enables recording, editing, and arranging with virtual instruments.
Live collaborative audio recording inside a web-based DAW timeline
Soundtrap stands out with real-time, browser-based audio recording and collaborative music making. It provides a DAW-like timeline for arranging loops, recording vocals, and editing tracks in a shared project.
Built-in instrument and loop libraries support quick composition, while export tools finalize mixes for playback or sharing. For teams, session collaboration is the core capability rather than heavy post-production workflows.
- +Browser-based DAW workflow enables instant recording and editing without local installs
- +Real-time collaboration supports shared sessions for vocals, beats, and arrangement work
- +Loop and instrument libraries accelerate song production from a blank project
- –Advanced mixing and mastering tools remain less deep than pro desktop DAWs
- –Large session complexity can feel constrained versus full-featured production suites
- –Export and project portability are practical but not as flexible as specialist editors
Best for: Education, creators, and small teams making collaborative audio tracks in-browser
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music and audio, Ableton Live stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Cdj Software
This guide covers Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, Pro Tools, Reaper, Studio One, Cubase, Bitwig Studio, GarageBand, and Soundtrap for CDJ-style workflows.
It maps integration depth, automation and API surface expectations, and admin and governance controls to concrete capabilities shown in each tool’s feature set and stated strengths.
The goal is to help teams pick the right playback, cueing, and tempo-matching behavior for live sets while avoiding configuration pitfalls that show up during performance.
CDJ-style software workspaces for cueing, tempo alignment, and deck-like playback
CDJ software is a performance workspace that supports deck-like playback, cueing, and tempo alignment while letting operators move between tracks or clips quickly.
Tools like Ableton Live deliver Session View clip launching plus Warp for tempo alignment, which directly maps to rapid transitions during DJ sets.
By contrast, Logic Pro, FL Studio, and GarageBand center on song production timelines and loop-based editing rather than two-deck live cueing workflows.
Reaper stands out as a configurable playback environment where deck controls, cue points, and tempo sync can be mapped to match controller-driven performance needs.
Evaluation criteria for CDJ workflows: integration, automation surface, and control depth
CDJ software selection works best when the evaluation focuses on how the tool models performance assets like tracks, clips, cues, and tempo changes.
Integration depth matters because live setups rely on routing, controller mapping, and predictable output to mixers and monitoring systems.
Automation and API surface affects whether playlists, cue points, and parameter states can be generated or triggered during events.
Admin and governance controls affect multi-operator venues through RBAC-like access patterns, audit trails, and repeatable configuration management.
Session or deck playback controls tied to cues and clip launching
Ableton Live uses Session View clip launching plus tight tempo control via Warp for fast performance transitions. Reaper provides deck playback with cue and loop controls designed to match live mixing behavior through controller mapping.
Tempo alignment and time-stretch behavior for beat-matched transitions
Ableton Live’s Warp keeps tempo alignment for mixed tracks and loops, which reduces manual corrections during set playback. Studio One’s Audio Warp and Pro Tools’ Elastic Audio support time-stretching and timing corrections, which helps when tracks need rearrangement.
Controller mapping and routing control for live hardware integration
Reaper emphasizes controller mapping flexibility and customizable deck layouts, which makes it practical for hardware-driven performance workflows. FL Studio, Cubase, and Studio One also support controller mapping, but their strongest value appears when the DJ playback workload stays inside the DAW session.
Automation lanes and repeatable parameter moves
Logic Pro includes automation lanes that make repeatable mix moves possible, which helps when transitions require consistent effect behavior. Pro Tools adds robust automation and bussing for detailed routing and signal flow during studio-grade mixing.
Extensible data model for remix-ready editing structures
Cubase emphasizes advanced MIDI editing with comprehensive quantize, articulation, and automation tools, which supports remix structures built from MIDI. FL Studio’s Piano Roll and step sequencer enable event-level editing and tight quantization, which supports pattern switching for CDJ-style remixing.
Complexity management for stable performance under dense routing and device graphs
Bitwig Studio includes Grid-based modulation and flexible routing, but mix management can become complex when many devices and modulators run together. Reaper can deliver stable deck output via I O flexibility, but advanced configuration requires careful setup to avoid performance surprises.
Decision framework for selecting CDJ software based on integration depth and performance control
Start with the performance interface model. Session View clip launching favors fast trigger workflows in Ableton Live and Bitwig Studio.
Then verify how the tool handles tempo changes and time-stretch behavior, because cueing without reliable alignment creates extra manual work mid-set.
Next evaluate automation and extensibility needs, since multi-operator venues and event production pipelines require triggerable states rather than manual editing.
Finally check governance and operational repeatability, because stable output, routing, and device chains must be configured once and reused consistently.
Map the performance model to clip launching versus timeline arrangement
If clip launching and rapid triggers drive the workflow, Ableton Live fits because Session View supports rapid clip launching for DJ-style sets. If the workflow stays anchored to a production timeline with automation lanes, Logic Pro and Studio One fit when DJing is done via DAW sessions rather than deck-like dual decks.
Validate tempo alignment and time-stretch tools for the catalog
Choose Ableton Live when Warp-based tempo control matters for mixed tracks and loops with minimal friction. Choose Studio One when Audio Warp time-stretching and clip-based beat-matched rearrangements are the primary transition method, or choose Pro Tools when Elastic Audio is needed for editing and correction.
Confirm controller mapping and output routing are controllable end-to-end
Choose Reaper when controller mapping flexibility plus customizable deck layouts matter for hardware integration. Choose Cubase when custom DJ-style control surfaces must map to deep automation lanes and MIDI-first sequencing, while accepting that dense routing can add setup complexity.
Plan for automation and extensibility needs before building sets
Choose tools that already model repeatable performance moves as automation in the project, like Logic Pro’s automation lanes and Pro Tools’ robust automation and bussing. If the operational requirement is modular live parameter control, choose Bitwig Studio because its Modulation System and Grid-based routing support tempo-synced parameter control.
Design governance via repeatable configuration and predictable session complexity
Choose Ableton Live for a clip-centric workflow but budget rehearsal time if deep routing and device chains are used, because mistakes can happen when routing is changed during performance. Choose Reaper for governance by configuration reuse via deck layout and output I O, while ensuring advanced configuration stays stable and tested for throughput and latency.
Match the editing depth to the event goal
Choose FL Studio when pattern-based remixing and fast pattern switching are the main CDJ-style actions, because Piano Roll and step sequencing enable rapid MIDI idea capture. Choose Soundtrap when collaboration is the primary operational goal, because browser-based real-time collaboration supports shared recording and arrangement work during production.
Audience fit for CDJ software picks by workflow and control requirements
Different CDJ software tools match different performance roles, like clip-trigger DJing, DAW timeline production DJing, or controller-mapped deck building.
The best fit depends on whether the session center is clip launching, timeline automation, or deck-like cue and loop controls.
Governance and integration depth requirements also narrow the selection for venues and teams managing multiple operators and devices.
Live performers running clip-trigger sets and beat-matched transitions
Ableton Live is a direct fit because Session View supports rapid clip launching and Warp keeps tempo alignment for mixed tracks and loops. Bitwig Studio is a second option when modular sound design and Grid-based tempo-synced modulation are needed during live parameter control.
Producers DJing inside a DAW timeline with automation-driven transitions
Logic Pro fits when automation lanes and quantized MIDI sequencing help build repeatable mix moves during sets. Studio One fits when Audio Warp supports beat-matched rearrangements while the performance stays anchored to the DAW session.
Experienced DJs building controller-driven deck workflows with deep customization
Reaper matches this role because it supports deck playback with cue points, looping, and tempo controls plus controller mapping and customizable audio routing. Cubase fits when controller mapping must operate alongside deep MIDI sequencing and automation lanes, with acceptance that learning curve and routing density can slow fast preparation.
Pattern-based remix performers switching musical sections quickly
FL Studio fits because the Piano Roll and step sequencer support event-level editing and tight quantization for rapid pattern switching. This role benefits from the large built-in instrument and effects ecosystem that supports production-driven performance sets.
Teams collaborating in-browser to assemble tracks before performance
Soundtrap fits for education, creators, and small teams because browser-based real-time collaboration enables shared recording and arrangement in a single timeline. It is best when advanced mastering depth is not the primary goal and when the collaborative workflow is the constraint.
Performance pitfalls caused by mismatched workflow models, routing complexity, and setup overhead
Most CDJ workflow failures come from choosing a tool whose primary UI model conflicts with live operation speed.
Other failures come from underestimating the setup time required for routing, device chains, and dense timelines.
The mistake patterns below map directly to practical issues seen across tools like Ableton Live, Reaper, and Bitwig Studio.
Treating production timelines as a deck substitute without testing transition latency
Logic Pro and Studio One work well for DAW-session DJing, but their deck mixing and live cueing are not the main focus, so cue speed can suffer. Rehearsal should include rapid track or clip changes while monitoring output stability and buffer-related performance behavior.
Overbuilding routing and device chains and then changing them under show conditions
Ableton Live supports deep routing and device chains, but rehearsal is needed because mistakes are possible when chains are adjusted during performance. Bitwig Studio’s flexible routing and Grid-based modulation can add complexity when many devices and modulators run together.
Assuming cue and deck behavior will appear automatically without a configurable deck model
Reaper can deliver deck-like cue and loop controls, but advanced configuration requires careful setup to avoid performance surprises. For deck-first operations, ensure controller mapping and deck layout are fully defined before building large libraries.
Expecting DJ cue workflows from tools that focus on composition-first editing
FL Studio is not designed as a dedicated DJ hardware-control system, so cueing and live mixing workflows may take more adaptation. Cubase and Studio One can run playback and remix work, but they are DAW-centric and can feel timeline-heavy under rapid transitions.
Ignoring session preparation complexity for dense libraries and large projects
Ableton Live can become complex when track organization grows during performance, which can slow down browsing and cue selection. Reaper’s browser and library workflows can feel dense during rapid set preparation if navigation is not streamlined.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, Pro Tools, Reaper, Studio One, Cubase, Bitwig Studio, GarageBand, and Soundtrap using criteria based on features, ease of use, and value.
Features carried the most weight in the final score, while ease of use and value each counted less than features in the overall rating.
We also weighted the practical fit of each tool to CDJ-style workflows using concrete capabilities like Ableton Live Session View clip launching with Warp, Reaper deck controls with cue and loop behavior, and Bitwig Studio Grid-based modulation for tempo-synced parameter control.
Ableton Live separated from lower-ranked tools because Session View clip launching combined with Warp and flexible tempo control lifts both performance workflow fit and live transition reliability, which raised its features rating and supported its high ease-of-use score.
Frequently Asked Questions About Cdj Software
Which tool works best for CDJ-style clip launching with tempo control?
What is the fastest workflow for building an arrangement timeline rather than cue decks?
Which option is most suitable for pattern-based live remixing and switching?
How do controller mapping and navigation typically affect CDJ-like performance in DAWs?
What are the key integration paths for working with external systems through APIs?
How do SSO and account-level security controls show up in these tools for team workflows?
What data migration steps are most relevant when moving projects into a different tool?
Which platform makes admin controls and auditability practical for shared workspaces?
Why do some setups feel unstable when using studio DAWs for performance playback?
Which tool offers the strongest extensibility for custom workflows and modular routing?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.