Top 10 Best Cash Liquidity Forecasting Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Business Finance

Top 10 Best Cash Liquidity Forecasting Software of 2026

Top 10 ranking of cash liquidity forecasting software for cash planning, with Fathom, Workday Adaptive Planning, and others compared for finance teams.

29 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Cash liquidity forecasting software turns banking and accounting feeds into rolling cash position models with scenario outputs and auditable assumptions. This ranked list targets analysts and finance operators who must compare integration depth, forecasting data models, and governance controls across treasury and FP&A workflows, including Planful and Workday Adaptive Planning.

Fathom is the best pick for treasury teams that run daily rolling liquidity forecasts with scenario comparisons and bank-driven actuals, whereas Kyriba fits when you need tight banking-to-forecast integration plus recurring review workflows.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Fathom

Cash concentration forecasting with scenario-specific visibility across account pools and daily positions.

Built for fits when treasury teams run daily rolling cash forecasts with scenario comparisons and bank-driven actuals..

2

Float

Editor pick

Rolling cash forecast logic that re-calcualtes using connected bank transactions and settlement timing rules.

Built for fits when FP&A or treasury teams need rolling cash forecasts with repeatable timing and bank-driven automation..

3

Dryrun

Editor pick

Daily rolling cash positioning workflow recalculates forecasts from connected transaction inputs as they update.

Built for fits when finance teams need frequent rolling liquidity updates with controlled forecast change management..

Comparison Table

Cash liquidity forecasting software turns banking and accounting feeds into rolling cash position models with scenario outputs and auditable assumptions. This ranked list targets analysts and finance operators who must compare integration depth, forecasting data models, and governance controls across treasury and FP&A workflows, including Planful and Workday Adaptive Planning.

1
FathomBest overall
SMB
9.5/10
Overall
2
9.2/10
Overall
3
8.8/10
Overall
4
enterprise
8.6/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.3/10
Overall
6
8.0/10
Overall
7
7.6/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.3/10
Overall
9
specialist
7.0/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

Fathom

SMB

Financial reporting software includes cash flow forecasting, scenario analysis, and management reporting.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.7/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

Cash concentration forecasting with scenario-specific visibility across account pools and daily positions.

Fathom ingests bank data and ties it to forecast logic for short-term cash forecasting and variance tracking against actual cash movement. The application is built around scenario management so assumptions can be swapped and compared without rewriting models. Automation is a first-order feature, with recurring refresh behavior that keeps rolling forecasts aligned to the latest inputs.

A key tradeoff is that deeper operational planning requires deliberate modeling of your cash drivers and timing rules, which adds upfront configuration work. Fathom fits best when treasury or FP&A owns a repeatable daily forecasting cadence and needs bank-level visibility plus scenario comparisons for short-term planning.

Pros
  • +Rolling cash forecast updates link bank movement to driver assumptions
  • +Scenario management supports fast assumption swaps and forecast comparison
  • +Cash concentration views summarize pooled positions and account-level detail
  • +Recurring automation reduces spreadsheet reconciliation and late forecast shifts
Cons
  • Cash-driver timing rules require careful setup to avoid forecast bias
  • Complex multi-entity structures can increase workflow configuration overhead
  • Advanced reconciliation paths may demand tighter input hygiene
Use scenarios
  • Treasury operations teams

    Daily liquidity forecast with scenario views

    Faster variance investigation

  • FP&A finance teams

    Driver-based short-term cash forecast

    Less manual spreadsheet work

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Finance systems administrators

    Automated bank ingestion and refresh

    Consistent forecasting cadence

    Coordinates recurring data refresh so forecast inputs stay aligned with bank-provided movement data.

  • CFO treasury governance

    Controlled scenarios for planning alignment

    More consistent planning decisions

    Uses scenario management to standardize assumptions across stakeholders and reduce ad hoc model edits.

Best for: Fits when treasury teams run daily rolling cash forecasts with scenario comparisons and bank-driven actuals.

#2

Float

SMB

Cash flow forecasting software creates rolling forecasts from accounting and banking data.

9.2/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

Rolling cash forecast logic that re-calcualtes using connected bank transactions and settlement timing rules.

Float is a spreadsheet-friendly cash forecasting product that centers forecasting logic around bank-connected inputs and repeatable timing assumptions. Forecasts can be configured with cash flow line items and rules for when transactions are expected to settle, which helps keep daily cash positioning consistent as new data arrives. Automation is geared toward updating the forecast using fresh transaction activity and scheduled refreshes rather than one-off imports.

The main tradeoff is that deeper general ledger or ERP-level mapping still depends on setup of the right accounts, categories, and timing rules, which can take time before the forecast matches reporting. Float fits best when a treasury or FP&A function already has a bank connectivity path and wants fewer spreadsheet copies while keeping forecast granularity for operational decisions.

Pros
  • +Rolling forecast updates from bank transaction activity
  • +Configurable timing rules for expected cash settlement
  • +API access supports pulling inputs and syncing outputs
  • +Scenario controls for planning comparisons
Cons
  • Account and category mapping setup can be time-consuming
  • Forecast logic depth can lag complex treasury workflows
  • Scenario changes may require careful review for downstream effects
  • Automation depends on reliable bank data feeds
Use scenarios
  • Treasury teams

    Daily cash positioning with rolling updates

    Fewer manual forecast refreshes

  • FP&A analysts

    Monthly rolling forecast for operating cash

    Improved forecast repeatability

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Accounting operations

    Cash visibility from reconciled transactions

    Reduced reclassification work

    Imports and classifies transaction data so cash categories align with operational reporting.

  • Finance system integrators

    Forecast sync via API automation

    Less spreadsheet handoff

    Uses the API to push modeled assumptions and pull forecast outputs into other finance tools.

Best for: Fits when FP&A or treasury teams need rolling cash forecasts with repeatable timing and bank-driven automation.

#3

Dryrun

SMB

Financial forecasting software models cash flow, budgets, and business scenarios visually.

8.8/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Daily rolling cash positioning workflow recalculates forecasts from connected transaction inputs as they update.

Dryrun is geared toward teams that need short-term cash forecast outputs that refresh as new transactions arrive, with configuration built around rolling horizons. Cash visibility is delivered through a daily positioning workflow that can be recalculated when inputs change. The integration surface is practical for recurring forecasting since connectivity and synchronization reduce manual spreadsheet updates.

A key tradeoff is that setup depends on getting bank connectivity and account mapping right before forecasts produce reliable cash balances. Dryrun fits best when a finance team runs frequent variance analysis cycles and needs faster turnaround on forecast edits than manual rework.

Pros
  • +Daily rolling cash workflow aligns forecasting with near-term liquidity decisions
  • +Automated refresh reduces manual spreadsheet reconciliation
  • +Workspace governance supports controlled forecast edits
  • +Forecast outputs synchronize with connected planning and reporting workflows
Cons
  • Accurate account mapping is required for dependable cash positioning
  • Complex model tuning takes time when multiple drivers interact
  • Some operational edge cases require additional configuration work
  • Sandboxing changes for stakeholders can add process overhead
Use scenarios
  • Treasury teams

    Daily liquidity position and actions

    Faster liquidity decision cycles

  • FP&A teams

    Near-term forecast refresh cadence

    Less manual forecast maintenance

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Finance operations

    Scenario updates from operational drivers

    More consistent forecast outputs

    Applies scenario assumptions and keeps downstream reports synchronized.

  • Controllers and audit owners

    Governed forecast changes

    Tighter forecast governance

    Uses admin controls and audit trails to manage and review forecast edits.

Best for: Fits when finance teams need frequent rolling liquidity updates with controlled forecast change management.

#4

Kyriba

enterprise

Treasury software provides cash positioning, liquidity forecasting, and cash management.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Treasury workflow orchestration that turns forecast runs into scheduled tasks and exception handling for variance-driven reforecasting.

Kyriba is a cash liquidity forecasting solution used for short-term cash forecast execution with treasury-focused workflows. It supports rolling cash forecast modeling and daily cash positioning by combining bank account aggregation with forecast logic that treasury teams can run on a recurring schedule.

Automation centers on configurable forecast calendars, tasking, and exception review so forecast variance analysis can flow into next-cycle adjustments. Integration depth is centered on treasury and banking connectivity so cash visibility updates can be reflected in forecasts without manual rekeying.

Pros
  • +Rolling cash forecast execution with recurring treasury workflows
  • +Forecast variance analysis designed for operational review loops
  • +Bank account aggregation supports daily cash positioning updates
  • +Automation reduces manual rekeying between cash visibility and forecast runs
Cons
  • Deeper configuration and governance needed for dependable forecast cycles
  • AP and AR forecasting coverage can require tighter upstream data modeling
  • Scenario analysis depends on disciplined input management across cycles
  • Advanced automation can increase implementation effort for complex bank setups

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need recurring rolling forecasts, variance review workflows, and tight banking-to-forecast integration for daily cash positioning.

#5

HighRadius

enterprise

Finance software supports cash forecasting, treasury management, and working capital control.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

Operational workflow automation that ties cash forecast updates to collections and payables execution timing.

HighRadius performs cash and working capital forecasting by linking transactional inputs to rolling short-term cash forecasts and scenario pivots. It is strongest where forecasting needs tight alignment to collections, payables, and credit risk timing so daily cash positioning stays consistent with expected inflows and outflows.

The product emphasizes automation and integration with enterprise systems rather than spreadsheet-only planning, which helps drive forecast variance analysis at a workflow level. Governance is handled through configurable permissions, monitored data flows, and controlled model updates so forecast changes follow review cycles.

Pros
  • +Forecast-to-collections and forecast-to-payables timing alignment
  • +Scenario pivots for rolling short-term cash forecast updates
  • +Integration depth for enterprise data feeds and operational workflows
  • +Forecast variance analysis workflows for follow-up actions
Cons
  • Requires strong data mapping discipline across banking and ERP inputs
  • Advanced automation needs more setup than basic rolling forecasts
  • Bank format coverage depends on upstream bank connectivity strategy
  • Change governance workflows can add coordination overhead

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need automated, operations-linked rolling cash forecasts with review-controlled changes.

#6

Agicap

SMB

Cash management software provides cash visibility, forecasting, and scenario planning.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Forecasting workflows that tie bank-fed balances to managed assumptions enable rolling updates without rebuilding the model.

Agicap is a cash and liquidity forecasting system built for daily cash positioning and rolling cash forecasts. It connects bank account data to forecasting workflows used by treasury and finance teams, then supports scenario planning and variance review across forecast periods.

The product is distinct for how it turns bank-fed balances into repeatable forecast cycles with managed assumptions and forecast ownership. Agicap also provides an integration and automation surface aimed at reducing manual rework in cash flow modeling and cash visibility reporting.

Pros
  • +Bank-fed balances update forecasting inputs for near-real-time daily cash positioning
  • +Scenario planning supports multiple short-term cash outcomes without rebuilding models
  • +Forecast variance views track deviations between expected and actual cash movements
  • +Workflow controls help finance teams standardize assumptions across forecast runs
Cons
  • Advanced automation often depends on IT support for deeper API-based integrations
  • Complex multi-entity cash pooling requires careful setup of account mappings
  • Granular reconciliation workflows can feel limited versus dedicated treasury workstation tools
  • Role-based governance features are not as detailed as some enterprise BI and FP&A suites

Best for: Fits when finance teams need repeatable rolling cash forecasts from bank data with scenario and variance controls.

#7

Jirav

SMB

FP&A software provides cash flow forecasting, budgeting, reporting, and financial modeling.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Cash forecasting built around forecast versions and assumption-driven scenarios that rerun without rebuilding mappings.

Jirav focuses on cash and liquidity forecasting by converting operational activity into a short-term cash forecast model that can run on a rolling schedule.

Data ingestion and transformation support forecast-ready timing, then compare actuals versus forecast to surface variance drivers during forecast variance analysis.

Assumptions and scenarios can be reconfigured so teams can repeat cash forecast runs and track changes across forecast versions.

Pros
  • +Forecast workflow maps transactions into timing buckets for usable rolling cash forecasting
  • +Versioned scenarios support repeatable assumption changes for short-term planning cycles
  • +Actuals and forecast reconciliation supports ongoing forecast variance analysis
  • +Built-in automation reduces manual spreadsheet refresh for daily and near-term views
Cons
  • Complex forecast logic can require careful configuration to avoid timing misalignment
  • Treasury management system integration depth may be limited outside supported connectors
  • Large multi-entity models can feel constrained by templated structures
  • Advanced electronic bank statement formats can require preprocessing before modeling

Best for: Fits when mid-market finance teams need a rolling cash forecast workflow with scenario reruns and reconciliation.

#8

Pigment

enterprise

Business planning software models cash flow, budgets, forecasts, and operational scenarios.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Model-level what-if scenario management with dependency-aware recalculation across cash views.

Pigment brings spreadsheet-like planning UX to liquidity forecasting workflows by letting treasury teams model cash positions with configurable data mappings and multi-dimensional scenarios. It connects forecasting to execution-ready outputs through reusable workspaces, approval-ready narratives, and dependency tracking between assumptions and cash views.

Pigment also supports automation via APIs and scheduled refresh patterns so bank account aggregation and forecast recalculation can run with governance controls. Strong model configuration and change tracking help teams manage rolling cash forecasts that need frequent updates without rebuilding scenarios.

Pros
  • +Scenario versions update from shared assumptions with clear dependency propagation
  • +API and automation hooks support scheduled recalculation of cash views
  • +Reusable planning workspaces reduce rework for rolling cash forecast runs
  • +Configurable permissions support treasury and finance governance around model access
Cons
  • Deep bank connectivity and cash format handling require integration design work
  • Complex treasury data pipelines can increase configuration overhead during setup
  • High-frequency refresh at scale can require careful throughput planning

Best for: Fits when finance and treasury teams want scenario-driven liquidity forecasts with automation and governed access.

#9

Tesorio

specialist

Cash flow performance software forecasts collections and provides real-time cash visibility.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Assumption-to-cash outcomes tracking in forecast variance review to pinpoint which drivers moved rolling liquidity.

Tesorio generates short-term cash forecasts by combining bank balances, cash movement data, and forecast drivers into rolling daily views. It is distinct for treasury-style forecasting workflows that connect forecast assumptions to transaction-level history for ongoing forecast variance review.

Core capabilities include multi-entity cash visibility, scenario planning around expected inflows and outflows, and automated refresh cycles that keep daily cash positioning current. Integrations focus on bringing data into the cash position workflow and pushing forecast outputs back into treasury reporting processes.

Pros
  • +Rolling daily cash forecast views for near-term liquidity decisions
  • +Scenario analysis tied to forecast assumptions for clearer variance drivers
  • +Multi-entity cash visibility to consolidate positions across legal units
  • +Automated data refresh cycles reduce manual forecast rework
Cons
  • Forecast outcome governance depends on disciplined assumption ownership
  • API and integration depth can require implementation effort for ERP-native flows
  • Less coverage of accounts payable and accounts receivable forecasting workflows
  • Model detail may be limited for highly customized cash flow method logic

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need rolling daily cash positioning with scenario planning and bank-balance-driven reconciliation.

#10

Runway

SMB

Financial planning software provides cash runway forecasts, scenario modeling, and reporting.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Rolling cash forecast refresh driven by operational inputs and bank activity timing, not a manual spreadsheet-style rebuild.

Runway focuses on producing a rolling cash forecast from operational inputs rather than limiting teams to static budgets. It connects forecast drivers into bank activity workflows so near-term daily cash positioning can update as data changes.

The tool also supports scenario analysis to compare outcomes across assumptions for receipts, payments, and timing. Runway’s governance is aimed at treasury users who need repeatable forecast refresh cycles and reviewable adjustments.

Pros
  • +Rolling forecast updates from operational drivers with day-level granularity
  • +Scenario analysis supports assumption comparisons for short-term liquidity decisions
  • +Bank-activity workflows help align forecast timing to actual cash movement
  • +Repeatable refresh cycles support consistent forecast maintenance
Cons
  • Limited coverage for complex multi-entity cash concentration structures
  • Deep ERP accounting granularity often needs extra mapping work
  • Automation relies heavily on correct data staging for accurate forecasts
  • Audit logging and RBAC controls are not detailed enough for strict treasury governance

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need rolling liquidity forecasting tied to operational drivers and bank activity refresh cycles.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 business finance, Fathom stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Fathom

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right cash liquidity forecasting software

Cash liquidity forecasting software keeps a rolling short-term cash forecast current by recalculating outcomes from connected transaction activity, timing rules, and bank-fed balances. This buyer’s guide covers Fathom, Float, Dryrun, Kyriba, HighRadius, Agicap, Jirav, Pigment, Tesorio, and Runway.

The practical buying questions focus on how each product refreshes forecasts, how it handles scenario reruns and forecast variance, and how operational workflows turn forecasts into daily liquidity decisions. The evaluations also prioritize automation and integration surfaces that reduce manual spreadsheet reconciliation while preserving forecast change control across entities.

Cash liquidity forecasting software for rolling daily cash positioning and scenario-driven liquidity planning

Cash liquidity forecasting software is built to produce a rolling cash forecast that updates as bank transactions and operational timing inputs change. Many tools then maintain scenario versions so teams can rerun forecasts using swapped assumptions without rebuilding the underlying timing setup.

Fathom is designed for cash concentration forecasting with scenario-specific visibility across account pools and daily positions, and its rolling updates connect bank movement to driver assumptions. Float targets repeatable rolling cash forecasts that recalculate from connected bank transactions using configurable settlement timing rules.

What to verify in cash liquidity forecasting automation and control

Cash liquidity forecasting software succeeds when it refreshes a rolling short-term forecast from connected transaction activity and bank-fed balances while preserving the timing assumptions that drive outcomes.

In this buyer’s guide set, the biggest differences show up in scenario rerun mechanics, daily positioning workflows, and how forecast runs get operationalized into variance-driven reviews and exception handling.

  • Scenario reruns with fast assumption swaps

    Fathom supports scenario management for quick assumption swaps and forecast comparison on daily positions. Jirav and Pigment both use versioned scenario workflows that rerun without rebuilding the timing setup.

  • Rolling forecast refresh driven by bank activity and timing rules

    Float recalculates rolling cash forecasts from connected bank transactions using configurable settlement timing rules. Agicap updates forecasting inputs from bank-fed balances so teams can roll forward without rebuilding the model.

  • Daily liquidity positioning workflow that auto-recalculates

    Dryrun recalculates forecasts from connected transaction inputs as they update to keep daily rolling cash positioning current. Tesorio provides rolling daily cash forecast views for near-term liquidity decisions tied to forecast assumptions for variance interpretation.

  • Operational workflow orchestration for forecast runs and exceptions

    Kyriba turns forecast runs into scheduled tasks and exception handling that drives variance-based reforecasting loops. HighRadius ties forecast updates to collections and payables execution timing so operational timing feeds the forecast refresh.

  • Dependency-aware scenario recalculation across cash views

    Pigment manages model-level what-if scenarios with dependency-aware recalculation across cash views. Pigment also exposes API and automation hooks that support scheduled recalculation for governed access.

  • Forecast-to-operations alignment across collections, payables, and timing

    HighRadius aligns rolling short-term cash forecast updates with forecast-to-collections and forecast-to-payables timing. Runway refreshes rolling forecasts from operational drivers with day-level granularity rather than manual spreadsheet-style rebuilds.

How to choose cash liquidity forecasting software by workflow and governance fit

The decision should start with the rolling forecast workflow that finance or treasury actually uses each day, because several products are built around daily positioning views while others are built around scheduled forecast orchestration and exception handling.

The second decision point should be how scenario reruns connect to forecast variance review, since some tools track assumption-driven outcomes while others structure scenario swaps around pool-level visibility or dependency propagation.

  • Match the refresh trigger to bank-led or transaction-led operations

    Choose Float when the forecast refresh should recompute from connected bank transaction activity using settlement timing rules. Choose Dryrun when the daily rolling cash positioning workflow should recalculate as connected transaction inputs update.

  • Pick scenario rerun design based on how assumptions change in practice

    Choose Fathom when scenario comparisons need scenario-specific visibility across account pools and daily positions with fast assumption swaps. Choose Jirav when scenario reruns should use forecast versions and assumption-driven reruns that avoid remapping.

  • Decide whether variance review is a workflow loop or an outcome trace

    Choose Kyriba when variance-driven reforecasting should run as scheduled tasks with exception handling for operational review loops. Choose Tesorio when forecast variance review should track assumption-to-cash outcomes so driver movement is pinpointed.

  • Evaluate integration depth by forecasting upstream inputs, not by connectivity claims

    Choose HighRadius when cash forecast updates must align with collections and payables execution timing and upstream operational inputs are already structured for that workflow. Choose Agicap when rolling updates should originate from bank-fed balances, and IT support is available if deeper API-based integrations are required.

  • Set governance expectations based on modeling complexity and multi-entity structures

    Choose Pigment when scenario views must update with dependency-aware recalculation across cash views and governed access is required via API and automation hooks. Choose Runway when coverage for complex multi-entity cash concentration structures must be assessed because limited coverage can add mapping work.

Who benefits from these cash liquidity forecasting workflows

Treasury teams use these tools to maintain cash visibility and make near-term liquidity decisions, but the day-to-day workflow differs by team structure and by how cash drivers are managed.

Finance teams also use them when FP&A owns rolling cash forecast models and needs repeatable scenario reruns tied to bank-driven updates.

  • Treasury teams running daily rolling cash forecasts with bank-led actuals

    Fathom supports daily rolling positions tied to cash concentration forecasting with scenario-specific visibility across account pools. Kyriba adds scheduled forecast execution and exception handling for daily variance review loops.

  • FP&A teams that need rolling cash forecasts with repeatable settlement timing rules

    Float recalculates rolling forecasts from connected bank transactions using configurable settlement timing rules. Agicap focuses on bank-fed balances that update forecasting inputs so rolling refresh happens without rebuilding the model.

  • Finance teams that want controlled change management for daily liquidity decisions

    Dryrun keeps daily rolling cash positioning current by recalculating forecasts from transaction inputs as they update. Tesorio structures forecast variance review around assumption ownership so governance depends on disciplined driver management.

  • Operations-linked treasury teams connecting cash forecasts to collections and payables

    HighRadius aligns forecast updates to collections and payables execution timing with scenario pivots for rolling short-term updates. Runway refreshes rolling forecasts from operational inputs with day-level granularity.

  • Mid-market teams that need versioned scenario reruns with reconciliation support

    Jirav organizes rolling cash forecasting around forecast versions and assumption-driven scenarios that rerun without rebuilding mappings. Dryrun also supports reconciliation through automated refresh that reduces spreadsheet reconciliation.

Common failure modes in cash liquidity forecasting deployments

Many cash liquidity forecasting implementations fail because they treat forecast refresh as a generic reporting refresh rather than a modeled timing system tied to bank-driven inputs.

Other failures come from scenario design that does not match how assumptions change in the organization or from weak account mapping that breaks cash positioning fidelity.

  • Assuming forecast timing will be correct without testing driver timing rules

    Fathom requires careful setup of cash-driver timing rules to avoid forecast bias. Float also depends on configurable timing rules for settlement outcomes to match actual bank behavior.

  • Building scenario changes without aligning them to the forecast workflow ownership model

    Tesorio governance depends on disciplined assumption ownership, which can cause forecast outcome governance drift. Pigment mitigates change propagation issues by using dependency-aware recalculation across cash views.

  • Skipping upstream account mapping validation before expecting trustworthy cash positioning

    Dryrun and Tesorio both require accurate account mapping for dependable cash positioning and forecast reconciliation. Runway can add extra mapping work when deep ERP accounting granularity is needed for complex multi-entity cash concentration structures.

  • Overloading automation without assessing configuration and governance overhead

    Kyriba needs deeper configuration and governance discipline for dependable forecast cycles. Fathom can increase workflow configuration overhead when multi-entity structures are complex.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated Fathom, Float, Dryrun, Kyriba, HighRadius, Agicap, Jirav, Pigment, Tesorio, and Runway on scenario rerun mechanics, rolling refresh behavior, and operational workflow automation. Features carried 40% of the weight because each tool’s forecast refresh model and scenario workflow determine whether daily liquidity decisions stay current.

Ease and value each carried 30% because mapping effort and configuration overhead directly affect whether rolling forecasts can be maintained after initial setup. Fathom ranked highest because its cash concentration forecasting delivered scenario-specific visibility across account pools and daily positions while its rolling updates linked bank movement to driver assumptions with fast scenario management.

Frequently Asked Questions About cash liquidity forecasting software

How do Fathom and Kyriba differ in rolling cash forecast execution for daily cash positioning?
Fathom runs rolling forecasts by modeling daily cash positioning from connected bank and operational inputs with scenario-based recalculation. Kyriba emphasizes treasury workflow orchestration by turning forecast runs into scheduled tasks with exception review to drive variance-driven reforecasting.
What breaks when Float’s settlement timing rules do not match actual payment processing for a short-term cash forecast?
Float recalculates forecasts using connected bank transactions and settlement timing rules. If settlement rules diverge from real processing, Dryrun-style daily cash positioning may still update from transactions, but forecast variance review will show persistent timing drift that requires assumption governance.
How do Pigment and Jirav handle forecast versions when teams need month-ahead and near-term daily positioning?
Jirav keeps forecast-ready timing buckets and maintains forecast versions so scenario reruns can be executed without rebuilding mappings. Pigment uses reusable workspaces and dependency-aware recalculation so changes in assumptions propagate across cash views and approval-ready narratives.
When should a treasury team choose Agicap over Tesorio for bank-fed balance forecasting cycles?
Agicap turns bank-fed balances into repeatable forecast cycles with managed assumptions and forecast ownership. Tesorio centers on daily views driven by bank balances and cash movement data, with assumption-to-cash outcomes tracked for ongoing forecast variance review.
Which tools provide native automation that updates forecasts from connected transaction changes instead of manual spreadsheet reconciliation?
Float automates forecast updates from bank transactions and scheduled inputs, reducing manual rework each forecasting cycle. Dryrun and Fathom recalculate daily rolling cash positioning from connected transaction inputs, while Pigment adds dependency-aware recalculation across cash views.
How do Planful-style planning workflows compare with Workday Adaptive Planning-style integration approaches for cash liquidity forecasting?
HighRadius links transactional inputs to rolling short-term cash forecasts so collections and payables timing stays aligned with daily cash positioning. Kyriba and Tesorio focus more on treasury-style execution workflows that connect banking-to-forecast updates into reporting cycles, which reduces manual rekeying but shifts governance to treasury tasking.
How do Dryrun and Kyriba support admin controls and audit trails for forecast change management?
Dryrun focuses on workspace governance and auditability for forecast changes tied to rolling cash positioning workflows. Kyriba’s administration centers on configurable forecast calendars, tasking, and exception review so model changes follow a structured review cycle.
What integration approach is most practical when cash visibility must aggregate multiple bank accounts into one short-term cash forecast?
Kyriba centers its cash visibility on bank account aggregation tied to treasury-focused forecast execution so daily positions reflect consolidated connectivity. Agicap and Tesorio also connect bank data into rolling forecasts, but Kyriba’s recurring tasking model is more tightly aligned with treasury daily operations.
Where does cash liquidity forecasting fall short when the data migration path from existing models is incomplete?
Pigment and Jirav depend on model configuration and mappings to map operational sources into forecast-ready timing buckets and cash views. If existing forecast structures and assumption definitions cannot be migrated into these mappings, forecast refresh cycles will still run, but scenario reruns and variance analysis will become less reliable, as seen when HighRadius automation cannot align transactional timing with the prior model logic.
How do Kyriba and Fathom support scenario analysis when teams must rerun assumptions after forecast variance review?
Fathom supports configurable forecast scenarios with automated update cycles so teams can compare daily positions under different assumptions. Kyriba turns variance review into scheduled exception handling for variance-driven reforecasting, which drives the next run from the reviewed scenario deltas rather than manual edits.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.