Top 10 Best Cash Liquidity Forecasting Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Business Finance

Top 10 Best Cash Liquidity Forecasting Software of 2026

Top 10 cash liquidity forecasting software tools ranked for treasury teams, with criteria, tradeoffs, and brief notes on Fathom, Float, Dryrun.

28 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Cash liquidity forecasting software maps bank and accounting data into a cash position model that supports rolling forecasts, scenario runs, and audit-ready reporting for finance teams. This ranked list targets evidence-minded buyers by comparing integration paths, automation depth, extensibility, and controls like RBAC and audit logs, using concrete evaluation criteria instead of feature claims.

Fathom is the best pick if treasury teams need driver-based rolling cash forecasts with bank-fed refresh and controlled scenarios, whereas Kyriba is the better fit when you want enterprise governance and banking-connected assumption workflows.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Fathom

Driver-level scenario modeling links cash movement changes to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability in the planning workspace.

Built for fits when treasury teams need driver-based rolling cash forecasts with bank-fed refresh and scenario control..

2

Float

Editor pick

Rule-based transaction mapping that converts ingested activity into scheduled inflow and outflow projections.

Built for fits when finance teams want fast rolling cash forecast updates from bank data and scenario edits..

3

Dryrun

Editor pick

Forecast governance that tracks changes across refresh cycles and helps attribute forecast variance to drivers.

Built for fits when treasury teams need frequent rolling forecasts plus variance explanations for assumption changes..

Comparison Table

1
FathomBest overall
SMB
9.5/10
Overall
2
9.2/10
Overall
3
8.8/10
Overall
4
enterprise
8.6/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.3/10
Overall
6
8.0/10
Overall
7
7.6/10
Overall
8
enterprise
7.3/10
Overall
9
specialist
7.0/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

Fathom

SMB

Financial reporting software includes cash flow forecasting, scenario analysis, and management reporting.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.7/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

Driver-level scenario modeling links cash movement changes to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability in the planning workspace.

Fathom is built for short-term cash planning where daily or weekly updates change outcomes, so it focuses on driver-based forecast logic rather than static reporting. Bank connectivity and electronic statement ingestion feed starting balances, while configurable cash movement inputs drive the forecast to cash position outputs. Scenario analysis and forecast variance views help teams trace which drivers changed the rolling cash forecast.

A key tradeoff is that forecast quality depends on maintaining driver mappings and model configuration as cash processes change. Fathom fits teams that already have bank connectivity working and can standardize cash movement categories across accounts to keep forecast inputs consistent.

Pros
  • +Bank ingestion to keep starting balances aligned with actuals
  • +Scenario analysis tied to driver inputs for faster what-if comparisons
  • +API and automation for pulling forecast drivers from upstream systems
  • +Variance views that isolate the cash movement drivers behind changes
Cons
  • –Forecast setup requires disciplined driver mapping across accounts
  • –Advanced integrations may need treasury data model adjustments
Use scenarios
  • Treasury operations teams

    Run weekly rolling cash positioning

    Shorter forecast refresh cycles

  • Finance planning teams

    Perform monthly liquidity what-if analysis

    Clear scenario deltas

Show 1 more scenario
  • FP&A and treasury analysts

    Analyze forecast variance vs actuals

    Faster variance root-cause

    Compare planned vs actual cash movements to identify which drivers shifted outcomes.

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need driver-based rolling cash forecasts with bank-fed refresh and scenario control.

#2

Float

SMB

Cash flow forecasting software creates rolling forecasts from accounting and banking data.

9.2/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

Rule-based transaction mapping that converts ingested activity into scheduled inflow and outflow projections.

Float’s core workflow centers on bank connectivity and transaction ingestion, then transforms those transactions into time-bucketed cash projections. The configuration layer lets teams define how transactions should map to categories and forecast periods, which reduces manual re-entry for frequent bank feeds. Automation and data handling are geared toward finance users who need rolling cash forecast views that update as new movements arrive.

A key tradeoff is that deeper ERP-linked cash logic still depends on what can be modeled through Float’s import and rule configuration, not on native general-ledger semantics. Float fits best when a finance team primarily forecasts cash timing from bank activity and then adds scenario changes for controllable drivers like payment schedules or collections assumptions.

Pros
  • +Automates cash timing updates from connected bank transactions
  • +Configurable mapping rules reduce repeated forecast rework
  • +Scenario adjustments update forecast outputs without rebuilding spreadsheets
  • +Task-style workflow helps teams keep forecast ownership clear
Cons
  • –ERP-native cash logic often requires model work via imports
  • –Advanced governance needs can outpace what small teams can administer
Use scenarios
  • FP&A teams

    Daily rolling liquidity view

    Fewer manual forecast refresh cycles

  • Treasury teams

    Cash planning with scenario changes

    Faster liquidity decision iterations

Show 1 more scenario
  • Accounting operations

    Payables timing discipline

    Cleaner short-term cash outlook

    Forecast outputs align payment timing with recorded and categorized transactions from feeds.

Best for: Fits when finance teams want fast rolling cash forecast updates from bank data and scenario edits.

#3

Dryrun

SMB

Financial forecasting software models cash flow, budgets, and business scenarios visually.

8.8/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Forecast governance that tracks changes across refresh cycles and helps attribute forecast variance to drivers.

Dryrun targets cash and liquidity forecasting where forecasts must stay aligned with bank reality through frequent refresh cycles. It supports structured inputs for inflows and outflows and produces scenarios for short-term cash forecast planning. Forecast variance analysis ties forecast deltas to specific drivers so teams can adjust assumptions rather than reforecast blindly.

A tradeoff is that teams with highly custom cash models may need configuration work to map their transaction logic into Dryrun inputs. Dryrun fits situations where daily bank updates and operational cash drivers need to roll into the same forecasting workflow, such as monthly close support with near-real-time cash visibility.

Pros
  • +Driver-level forecast variance analysis links deltas to specific assumptions
  • +Rolling refresh workflow keeps short-term forecasts aligned with recent movements
  • +Scenario planning supports changes to key cash drivers without rebuilding models
  • +Forecast cycle governance records edits for auditability across iterations
Cons
  • –Mapping complex custom cash logic into standard inputs can take time
  • –Heavily bespoke bank feeds may require additional integration effort
  • –Advanced modeling beyond standard cash drivers needs more setup discipline
Use scenarios
  • Treasury teams

    Daily cash positioning with explanations

    Faster assumption corrections

  • FP&A teams

    Scenario planning for near-term liquidity

    Clear liquidity tradeoffs

Show 1 more scenario
  • Finance operations teams

    Standardized cash workflow controls

    Reduced forecast inconsistency

    Uses audit-ready change tracking to coordinate model edits across forecast cycles.

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need frequent rolling forecasts plus variance explanations for assumption changes.

#4

Kyriba

enterprise

Treasury software provides cash positioning, liquidity forecasting, and cash management.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Forecast variance visibility tied to assumption changes across entities, so reviewers can trace why the next cash position moved.

Kyriba is a treasury cash visibility and liquidity forecasting system that feeds near-term cash planning from connected banking and corporate finance data. The tool supports rolling cash forecast workflows with centralized assumptions and forecast variance visibility across entities.

Kyriba also provides an automation surface through integration and API capabilities that move bank balances, transactions, and cash positions into the forecasting model. Governance features such as role-based access and audit trails support controlled forecast changes across treasury and finance users.

Pros
  • +Automated ingestion of bank data into rolling cash forecast positioning
  • +Scenario and assumption controls for structured forecast updates
  • +Role-based permissions and audit trails for controlled forecast changes
  • +Integration and API access for connecting ERP and treasury inputs
Cons
  • –Liquidity forecasting setup needs treasury-specific data mapping and rules
  • –Forecast model depth can feel heavy without strong internal ownership
  • –Advanced automation requires careful governance of data sources and overrides
  • –Customization of assumptions may increase maintenance across forecast cycles

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need rolling cash forecast governance with banking-connected inputs and controlled assumption workflows.

#5

HighRadius

enterprise

Finance software supports cash forecasting, treasury management, and working capital control.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

Forecast change governance with tracked user permissions and audit-ready planning history for multi-team liquidity cycles.

HighRadius supports cash and liquidity forecasting workflows that connect financial planning inputs with short-horizon cash positioning and variance monitoring. It is used to drive day-to-day visibility by rolling forecasts forward, aligning receivables and payables expectations to forecast timelines, and capturing operational drivers that shift cash outcomes.

The differentiator in many deployments is the depth of transaction and banking integration options that feed forecast models and keep bank balances synchronized with planning assumptions. Governance controls for forecast planning, including user role permissions and auditability of planning changes, reduce operational risk when forecasts flow across treasury and finance teams.

Pros
  • +Rolling short-horizon forecasting supports frequent cash visibility updates
  • +Receivables and payables expectations tie forecast outputs to operational drivers
  • +Integration options help keep bank balances aligned with planning assumptions
  • +Governance controls support controlled forecast changes across finance roles
Cons
  • –Integration depth can require substantial implementation effort
  • –Forecast model configuration can slow down changes for teams without planning analysts
  • –Scenario analysis requires disciplined assumption management to avoid conflicting drivers
  • –Complex data connectivity can increase dependency on ongoing data operations

Best for: Fits when treasury and finance need rolling cash forecasts with strong banking and transaction integration.

#6

Agicap

SMB

Cash management software provides cash visibility, forecasting, and scenario planning.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Forecast cycle workflows that connect driver updates, approvals, and bank reconciliation into one rolling operating rhythm.

Agicap targets teams that need a rolling cash forecast with daily visibility across bank accounts, instead of a static monthly model. It centralizes cash positioning, links operational drivers like receivables and payables, and supports scenario work to see how planned changes shift the short-term outlook.

Forecasts stay connected to actuals through continuous bank feed ingestion and reconciliation workflows that reduce manual variance handling. The tool’s fit is clearest where finance teams need repeatable forecasting cycles with clear ownership and auditability.

Pros
  • +Rolling short-term cash forecasting tied to continuously updated bank balances
  • +Scenario modeling that updates forecast outputs from planned driver changes
  • +Configurable workflow for forecast cycles with defined responsibilities
  • +Strong ingestion and reconciliation to reduce manual bank-to-forecast mismatches
Cons
  • –Workflow setup and driver mapping require disciplined configuration
  • –Complex multi-ledger structures can increase forecast model maintenance effort
  • –API and automation options may require specialist integration work for edge cases
  • –Variance analysis depth depends on how drivers are structured in the forecast

Best for: Fits when finance teams need daily cash visibility with a rolling forecast cycle and repeatable scenario workflows.

#7

Jirav

SMB

FP&A software provides cash flow forecasting, budgeting, reporting, and financial modeling.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Driver-based rolling cash forecast built around recurring bank statement ingestion and forecast recalculation across scenarios.

Jirav targets short-term cash planning with a modeled workflow that links budgets, forecast drivers, and bank balances into one rolling view. It supports bank account aggregation and electronic bank statement ingestion to reduce manual tie-outs and keep daily cash positioning current.

The product also covers accounts payable forecasting and accounts receivable forecasting to translate operational activity into a cash forecast, then applies scenario analysis for forecast variance review. Admin and control features focus on configuring planning entities and managing who can revise forecasts and view results.

Pros
  • +Rolling cash forecast view ties bank balances to forecast drivers
  • +Electronic bank statement ingestion supports recurring refresh cycles
  • +AP and AR forecasting reduces manual cash model maintenance
  • +Scenario analysis supports variance-driven forecast updates
Cons
  • –Depth of host-to-host connectivity can lag TMS-centric deployments
  • –Scenario governance needs disciplined approval workflows for audit trails

Best for: Fits when finance teams need rolling cash forecast workflows with frequent bank refreshes and structured AP and AR drivers.

#8

Pigment

enterprise

Business planning software models cash flow, budgets, forecasts, and operational scenarios.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Pigment’s worksheet-level scenario management keeps scenario parameters, calculations, and outputs synchronized in one planning workspace.

Pigment is a planning and analytics environment used to model cash and liquidity forecasts with interactive dashboards and calculation logic. It supports forecast inputs, scenario comparison, and workflow-driven planning that finance teams can configure without building a custom app from scratch.

Pigment’s integration approach centers on connecting data sources, loading structured planning inputs, and pushing results back into the rest of the finance data flow. Strongest fit appears when forecasting governance, version control, and repeatable scenario runs matter more than pure bank-statement ingestion.

Pros
  • +Scenario runs and variance views stay tied to the same planning model
  • +Configurable calculations reduce reliance on external spreadsheet logic
  • +Forecast workflows align planning steps with approver review cycles
  • +Audit-friendly change history supports month-end reconciliation
Cons
  • –Bank statement ingestion and bank connectivity are not the core focus
  • –Rolling daily cash positioning needs careful model and refresh design
  • –Complex cash concentration pooling logic may require custom calculation work
  • –Integration depth depends on connectors and data mapping effort

Best for: Fits when finance teams need governed cash and liquidity scenario planning with workflow and reporting control.

#9

Tesorio

specialist

Cash flow performance software forecasts collections and provides real-time cash visibility.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Rolling cash positioning tied to configurable cash drivers for automated forecast refresh and scenario variance tracking.

Tesorio ingests bank and account data to produce a daily rolling cash positioning view and short-term cash forecast outputs for finance teams. Forecast logic is centered on configurable cash flow drivers mapped to bank balances, with scenario comparison for variance planning.

The product emphasizes workflow automation for updates, approvals, and forecast publishing so teams can keep liquidity views current without spreadsheet rework. Integration depth is mainly expressed through data ingestion and connectivity options, with an API surface intended for extending forecast inputs and syncing results.

Pros
  • +Daily rolling cash positioning reduces reliance on manual balance stitching
  • +Configurable driver mapping supports repeatable short-term cash forecast models
  • +Scenario comparisons help trace forecast variance against baseline plans
  • +Automated forecast update and publishing workflows reduce spreadsheet carryover
Cons
  • –Advanced setups can require disciplined driver definitions across scenarios
  • –Less depth for procurement and receivables forecasting compared with ERP-native planning

Best for: Fits when treasury teams need daily rolling cash forecast updates with scenario variance analysis and repeatable driver mapping.

#10

Runway

SMB

Financial planning software provides cash runway forecasts, scenario modeling, and reporting.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Forecast assumption workflows with change traceability for cash scenario iterations across rolling forecast cycles.

Runway is a cash liquidity forecasting software built around connecting data sources and translating them into rolling cash forecasts for finance teams. Its core value comes from bank and accounting data ingestion, forecasting workflows, and scenario inputs that feed short-term cash positioning.

Runway also emphasizes automation through reusable models and scheduled refresh so forecasts stay aligned with new transactions. Where teams need governance over who can change assumptions and what data is used, Runway focuses on admin controls and audit visibility.

Pros
  • +Scenario inputs support rolling cash forecast what-if comparisons.
  • +Scheduled data refresh reduces manual rebuilds of short-term forecasts.
  • +Bank data ingestion helps keep daily cash positioning current.
  • +Assumption workflows keep updates traceable across forecast cycles.
Cons
  • –Automation depth depends on the quality of connected source data.
  • –Scenario structures can require careful assumption mapping to avoid drift.
  • –Advanced reporting needs tighter configuration than built-in summary views.
  • –Requires consistent setup discipline to prevent forecast variance noise.

Best for: Fits when finance teams need rolling cash forecast refresh plus scenario modeling with tight assumption control.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 business finance, Fathom stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Fathom

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right cash liquidity forecasting software

Cash liquidity forecasting software brings bank-fed cash positioning and forward-looking inflow and outflow schedules into one operating rhythm for finance and treasury teams. This buyer’s guide covers Fathom, Workday Adaptive Planning, and eight additional tools that differ most in driver-level modeling, forecast variance traceability, and automation for rolling refresh cycles.

Selection hinges on integration depth, the planning data model used for cash drivers and scenarios, and how each product handles automation and API surface for ingestion, recalculation, and approvals. Fathom leads with driver-linked scenario modeling tied to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability in the planning workspace, while Float emphasizes rule-based transaction mapping to convert ingested activity into scheduled projections.

Cash liquidity forecasting software for rolling cash visibility, driver modeling, and scenario governance

Cash liquidity forecasting software produces short-term cash forecast outputs that roll forward as new bank balances and transactional inputs refresh the model. It typically connects bank ingestion to cash positioning and combines cash drivers for inflows, outflows, and timing so scenario edits change forecast results in a controlled workflow.

Fathom applies driver-level scenario modeling that links changes in cash movement assumptions to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability, which supports governance when reviewers need to see why the next cash position moved. Kyriba pairs automated bank data ingestion with assumption and scenario controls across entities, so forecast variance visibility ties back to what changed in the inputs during rolling governance.

Integration, automation, and governance features that decide forecast reliability

Cash liquidity forecasting software fails or succeeds based on how bank balances and transactional activity become a rolling short-term cash forecast with correct timing and consistent inputs. These features determine whether the model updates predictably on refresh cycles or requires manual rebuilds and spreadsheet reconciliation.

  • Driver-linked scenario modeling with variance traceability

    Fathom ties driver changes to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability in the planning workspace. Dryrun also links forecast deltas to specific assumptions across refresh cycles for frequent rolling forecasts.

  • Rule-based transaction mapping from ingested bank activity

    Float converts connected bank transaction activity into scheduled inflow and outflow projections using rule-based transaction mapping. Agicap uses a rolling forecast cycle that connects driver updates, approvals, and bank reconciliation into daily operating rhythm.

  • Forecast governance across refresh cycles and multi-team planning

    Kyriba provides scenario and assumption controls that support structured forecast updates across entities with visibility into what changed. HighRadius adds forecast change governance with tracked user permissions and audit-ready planning history for multi-team liquidity cycles.

  • Rolling refresh workflow design for short-horizon cash positioning

    Jirav builds a rolling cash forecast workflow around recurring electronic bank statement ingestion and scenario recalculation. Tesorio emphasizes daily rolling cash positioning tied to configurable cash drivers for automated forecast refresh and scenario variance tracking.

  • Planning workspace model control versus external spreadsheet logic

    Pigment keeps scenario parameters, calculations, and outputs synchronized at the worksheet level in one planning workspace. Fathom also prioritizes a planning workspace that keeps traceability attached to driver-linked scenario changes.

Choose by forecast operating model, not by feature checklists

Cash liquidity forecasting software selection should start with the forecast operating model the team will actually run each day or each week. The deciding factors are how ingestion becomes forecast inputs, how drivers and scenarios recalculate, and how variance is explained back to reviewers.

  • Pick driver discipline if variance explanations must tie to assumption changes

    Select Fathom when forecast reviewers must trace how changes in cash movement assumptions produce forecast variance with audit-ready traceability. Select Dryrun when frequent rolling refreshes must attribute forecast variance to specific assumptions across refresh cycles for governance.

  • Pick transaction mapping automation if the team needs fast timing updates

    Select Float when connected bank transactions must be converted into scheduled inflow and outflow projections through configurable mapping rules. Select Agicap when daily cash visibility depends on continuously updated bank balances tied to a rolling forecast cycle with repeatable scenario workflows.

  • Pick governance depth when multiple teams iterate scenarios with permissions

    Select HighRadius when tracked user permissions and audit-ready planning history across multi-team liquidity cycles are required. Select Kyriba when assumption and scenario controls must provide traceable governance across entities with banking-connected inputs.

  • Pick recurring statement-driven refresh when bank ingestion is the heartbeat

    Select Jirav when rolling cash forecasting must run on recurring bank statement ingestion and scenario recalculation across scenarios. Select Runway when scheduled data refresh supports rolling cash forecast refresh plus scenario modeling with tight assumption control.

  • Validate implementation shape against internal planning ownership capacity

    Choose Fathom when driver mapping can be maintained with disciplined driver-to-account mapping for forecast setup. Choose Pigment when worksheet-level scenario parameter control reduces reliance on external spreadsheet logic, but validate whether bank connectivity is sufficient for rolling daily cash positioning.

Who benefits from cash liquidity forecasting software

Treasury and finance teams benefit when rolling cash positioning refreshes from bank-connected inputs and scenario edits recalculate forecast outputs in a controlled workflow. The best fit depends on whether the organization needs driver governance, transaction mapping speed, or multi-team audit-ready history.

  • Treasury teams running rolling cash forecasts with scenario governance

    Fathom fits teams that need driver-based scenario modeling that links cash movement changes to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability. Kyriba fits teams that need assumption and scenario controls tied to banking-connected inputs across entities.

  • Finance teams updating forecast timing from bank transactions

    Float fits teams that want rule-based transaction mapping to convert ingested activity into scheduled projections with configurable mapping rules. Tesorio fits teams that need daily rolling cash positioning with configurable driver mapping to reduce manual balance stitching.

  • Organizations coordinating liquidity cycles across teams with audit requirements

    HighRadius fits organizations that need forecast change governance with tracked user permissions and audit-ready planning history. Dryrun fits organizations that require variance explanations tied to assumptions across refresh cycles for governance.

  • Teams centered on recurring electronic bank statement refresh operations

    Jirav fits teams that build rolling cash forecasting around recurring electronic bank statement ingestion and forecast recalculation across scenarios. Runway fits teams that rely on scheduled data refresh to reduce manual rebuilds in rolling forecast cycles.

Common pitfalls that create forecast drift and governance gaps

Cash liquidity forecasting software commonly fails when the forecast model is configured without matching the organization’s operating cadence and approval workflow. Another frequent failure is treating variance explanations as an afterthought instead of wiring them into refresh cycles and assumption changes.

  • Building the model without disciplined driver mapping across accounts

    Fathom can require disciplined driver mapping across accounts so forecast setup stays consistent when scenarios change. Tesorio also needs careful driver definitions across scenarios to avoid drift in automated refresh.

  • Using complex custom cash logic that does not map cleanly into standard inputs

    Dryrun can take time when mapping complex custom cash logic into standard inputs. Kyriba can require treasury-specific data mapping and rules so reviewers can trust assumption workflow outcomes.

  • Over-indexing on bank ingestion while under-designing the forecast governance workflow

    Agicap reduces manual balance stitching through rolling daily cash forecasting tied to bank reconciliation, but workflow setup still needs disciplined configuration and driver mapping. HighRadius adds forecast change governance, but forecast model configuration can slow changes for teams without planning analysts.

  • Assuming scenario governance will hold without structured approvals for audit trails

    Runway scenario structures require careful assumption mapping to avoid drift in rolling iterations. Jirav scenario governance needs disciplined approval workflows so audit trails remain consistent across refresh cycles.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated cash liquidity forecasting software across bank-fed rolling cash positioning, driver-linked scenario recalculation, and forecast variance traceability. Features made up 40% of the score, and ease of use and value each made up 30% of the score.

Fathom ranked first because driver-level scenario modeling links cash movement changes to forecast variance with audit-ready traceability inside the planning workspace. Kyriba, Float, and Dryrun placed highest in governance and automation depth where reviewers need to see exactly what changed in assumptions and inputs between refresh cycles.

Frequently Asked Questions About cash liquidity forecasting software

How does Fathom handle scenario changes in rolling cash forecasts?
Fathom ties forecast variance to driver-level scenario edits so finance teams can see which cash movement change drove the next forecast outcome. The planning workspace keeps traceability from assumptions to results so variance analysis stays reproducible across refresh cycles.
Which tool is better for rule-based allocation of bank transactions into cash timing?
Float is built around transaction timing using configurable rules that map ingested activity into scheduled inflows and outflows. This approach reduces spreadsheet rebuilding when actual cash timing shifts because the allocation rules apply at refresh time.
When teams need daily cash positioning with bank reconciliation workflows, what should be evaluated?
Agicap connects rolling cash forecast cycles to continuous bank feed ingestion and reconciliation workflows. That design keeps daily cash visibility aligned with actuals, which reduces manual variance handling compared with tools that only refresh on demand.
What breaks if forecast governance and audit trails are missing from a liquidity forecasting workflow?
Dryrun relies on forecast governance to make changes auditable across refresh cycles so variance explanations can be traced back to assumption updates. Without that governance layer, forecast variance analysis becomes dependent on manual notes instead of an audit trail linked to drivers.
How do Kyriba and HighRadius differ in what they expose for forecast variance and permissions?
Kyriba emphasizes forecast variance visibility tied to assumption changes across entities and pairs it with role-based access and audit trails. HighRadius focuses on forecast change governance with tracked user permissions and audit-ready planning history across multi-team liquidity cycles.
Where does bank statement ingestion matter most for rolling cash forecasts?
Jirav centers its rolling cash forecast on recurring electronic bank statement ingestion and forecast recalculation across scenarios. This workflow reduces tie-outs for teams that need frequent bank refreshes and structured forecast drivers for AP and AR.
How do integration approaches affect extensibility when connecting upstream planning systems to liquidity models?
Fathom offers an API surface so finance teams can integrate forecast outputs into treasury workflows and upstream planning systems. Pigment focuses on workflow-driven configuration with a calculation environment that connects data sources, loads structured planning inputs, and pushes results back into the finance data flow.
What admin controls are typically required to manage who can revise a rolling cash forecast?
Kyriba includes role-based access and audit trails to control who can change assumptions and approve forecast updates. Runway similarly targets assumption workflows with change traceability so reviews can audit what data and inputs produced each cash scenario iteration.
How should a team choose between a cash positioning-first workflow and a driver-first modeling workflow?
Tesorio starts with daily rolling cash positioning and then produces short-term cash forecast outputs using configurable cash flow drivers mapped to bank balances. In contrast, Dryrun connects daily cash positioning to driver-level assumptions and generates rolling forecasts with variance explanations linked to those assumptions.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.