GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
General KnowledgeTop 10 Best Card File Software of 2026
Top 10 Card File Software picks compared for organizing cards, notes, and collections. Explore ranks and choose the right tool.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Notion
Database views with properties, filters, and relationships
Built for personal research or knowledge bases using interconnected card records.
Microsoft Lists
Power Automate triggers and actions tied directly to list item changes
Built for teams managing card-based trackers with Microsoft 365 collaboration and automation.
Airtable
Relational fields that link card records across multiple tables
Built for teams building relational card files with automation and shared governance.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates Card File Software options side by side, including Notion, Microsoft Lists, Airtable, Coda, ClickUp, and other popular tools. It summarizes how each platform structures records, supports collections and tags, enables search, and manages collaboration so readers can identify the best fit for a card-style workflow.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Notion Notion provides database-backed card views for contact-like records, tags, templates, and fast search for a digital card file system. | all-in-one | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 |
| 2 | Microsoft Lists Microsoft Lists supports card-style views over structured list items, with filtering, grouping, and sharing for maintaining a card file of contacts or references. | office-collaboration | 8.1/10 | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 3 | Airtable Airtable delivers card and grid views over customizable records, with relations, forms, and automations for building a card file workflow. | database-cards | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 4 | Coda Coda enables card-style item collections inside doc-based apps, with formulas and tables for a flexible card file that stays searchable. | doc-apps | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 |
| 5 | ClickUp ClickUp supports database views such as card-style boards for organizing entries with statuses, fields, and workflows like a structured card file. | task-board | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 6 | Trello Trello boards use cards, labels, and custom fields to maintain lightweight card files for people, vendors, or reference material. | kanban-cards | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 | 5.9/10 |
| 7 | Zoho Creator Zoho Creator builds custom card-style apps with forms, searchable records, and role-based access for maintaining a card file database. | custom-apps | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 8 | Google Sheets Google Sheets can be structured as a card-file table and displayed as card-like layouts using add-ons and templates while staying fully searchable. | spreadsheet-based | 7.8/10 | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 9 | Google Contacts Google Contacts stores contact cards with searchable profiles, labels, and syncing across devices for a basic digital card file. | contacts | 7.8/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 10 | Evernote Evernote organizes content into notes and notebooks with saved tags and search, supporting card-like personal reference files. | notes | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.7/10 |
Notion provides database-backed card views for contact-like records, tags, templates, and fast search for a digital card file system.
Microsoft Lists supports card-style views over structured list items, with filtering, grouping, and sharing for maintaining a card file of contacts or references.
Airtable delivers card and grid views over customizable records, with relations, forms, and automations for building a card file workflow.
Coda enables card-style item collections inside doc-based apps, with formulas and tables for a flexible card file that stays searchable.
ClickUp supports database views such as card-style boards for organizing entries with statuses, fields, and workflows like a structured card file.
Trello boards use cards, labels, and custom fields to maintain lightweight card files for people, vendors, or reference material.
Zoho Creator builds custom card-style apps with forms, searchable records, and role-based access for maintaining a card file database.
Google Sheets can be structured as a card-file table and displayed as card-like layouts using add-ons and templates while staying fully searchable.
Google Contacts stores contact cards with searchable profiles, labels, and syncing across devices for a basic digital card file.
Evernote organizes content into notes and notebooks with saved tags and search, supporting card-like personal reference files.
Notion
all-in-oneNotion provides database-backed card views for contact-like records, tags, templates, and fast search for a digital card file system.
Database views with properties, filters, and relationships
Notion stands out by letting card-file records live inside a database with full wiki-style pages and linked context. Users can build customizable card layouts using database views, then enrich each card with properties, tags, and relationships to other records. The tool supports fast retrieval through sorting, filtering, and search across database content, plus lightweight workflows through templates and recurring page structures.
Pros
- Database-backed cards with sortable and filterable views for quick retrieval
- Rich page content inside each record supports notes, media, and context
- Relational links connect cards into networks instead of isolated entries
Cons
- Complex schemas and relations can become hard to maintain at scale
- Card-style workflows feel less specialized than dedicated card-file tools
- Bulk edits across structured properties can be slower than expected
Best For
Personal research or knowledge bases using interconnected card records
More related reading
Microsoft Lists
office-collaborationMicrosoft Lists supports card-style views over structured list items, with filtering, grouping, and sharing for maintaining a card file of contacts or references.
Power Automate triggers and actions tied directly to list item changes
Microsoft Lists stands out for building card-based trackers inside Microsoft 365, using list views that map cleanly to index-card workflows. It supports fields, sorting, and filtering to organize cards by category, status, owner, or due date. Integrations with Microsoft Power Automate and Microsoft Teams enable alerts, assignment updates, and approval-style flows tied to card changes. As a result, it works well for lightweight card files that need governance and collaboration rather than standalone database power.
Pros
- Card-like list views with sorting and filtering for fast lookup
- Rich column types support tags, dates, choice fields, and person assignments
- Power Automate workflows can react to item creation and status changes
Cons
- Card files with complex relationships require workarounds across lists or columns
- Offline use and advanced desktop editing are limited compared to dedicated database tools
- Global search across many card libraries can feel slower than specialized indexing
Best For
Teams managing card-based trackers with Microsoft 365 collaboration and automation
Airtable
database-cardsAirtable delivers card and grid views over customizable records, with relations, forms, and automations for building a card file workflow.
Relational fields that link card records across multiple tables
Airtable stands out by combining a spreadsheet-like database with a configurable card view for contact, asset, and project tracking. It supports relational linking between tables, automated workflows, and per-view filtering and sorting. Card layouts can be tailored with fields, attachments, and custom record views, making it feel closer to a card file than a traditional form builder. It also integrates with external tools and supports granular permissioning for collaborative record curation.
Pros
- Card views over rich records with attachments, links, and custom field layouts
- Relational table linking enables multi-entity card files with consistent metadata
- Automations trigger on record changes for hands-off card updates
- Permissions and shared bases support controlled team curation of records
- Integrations and sync options connect card files to existing workflows
Cons
- Database modeling takes planning for complex card relationships
- Performance and usability degrade with very large bases and heavy attachments
- Advanced formatting options are limited compared to dedicated CRM card systems
Best For
Teams building relational card files with automation and shared governance
More related reading
Coda
doc-appsCoda enables card-style item collections inside doc-based apps, with formulas and tables for a flexible card file that stays searchable.
Formula-powered tables and doc-native views that transform card fields into dynamic layouts
Coda stands out by turning card-style records into fully programmable documents with tables, embeds, and automations in one workspace. Card File creation is driven by database-style tables that support rich fields like text, numbers, dates, dropdowns, and attachments. It also enables relationships between card tables, repeatable views for pipelines, and rules-based updates across linked records. The result is a practical hybrid of a card file and a lightweight workflow builder without leaving the document canvas.
Pros
- Card records live inside documents with tables, views, and embeds
- Linked tables support relationships for structured card collections
- Automation rules can update and route items based on field changes
- Dashboard-like views make scanning and filtering card files fast
Cons
- Form-heavy card workflows require careful setup and permissions
- Advanced formulas and automation logic add complexity over time
- Large card collections can feel slower to iterate during editing
Best For
Teams building relational card files with workflow automation and dashboards
ClickUp
task-boardClickUp supports database views such as card-style boards for organizing entries with statuses, fields, and workflows like a structured card file.
Custom Fields across boards, lists, and dashboards for card-level structured metadata
ClickUp distinguishes itself with customizable “views” and a unified workspace that turns tasks, lists, and data into a card-like filing system. It supports kanban boards, list views, and dashboards that can organize cards by status, owner, priority, and custom fields. Workflow automation through rules and integrations helps move cards through repeatable steps without building separate tooling. Document attachments on tasks add a light content layer for card records.
Pros
- Multiple board and list views make card filing adaptable to workflow changes
- Custom fields let cards store structured metadata like categories and due dates
- Rules and automations move and update cards based on status and triggers
- Dashboards aggregate cards across spaces and teams for quick scanning
Cons
- Card data modeling can get complex with many custom fields and rules
- Search and filtering feel less precise than dedicated database-style filing tools
- Large workspaces can become harder to maintain without governance
Best For
Teams using card-based workflows with structured fields and automation
Trello
kanban-cardsTrello boards use cards, labels, and custom fields to maintain lightweight card files for people, vendors, or reference material.
Automation via Butler for moving cards, assigning members, and triggering workflows
Trello stands out with a highly visual card and board model that maps naturally to a personal card file of ideas, contacts, or tasks. Boards, lists, and cards let users store structured notes with checklists, labels, attachments, and due dates. Power-Ups and automations add cross-system links and workflow triggers without building custom software. Search and filters help retrieve cards, while built-in permissions support shared workflows for small teams.
Pros
- Boards and cards provide a clear visual card-file hierarchy
- Cards support attachments, labels, checklists, and due dates
- Power-Ups extend storage, integrations, and automation options
- Search across boards and tags speeds retrieval
Cons
- Indexing beyond labels can feel limited for complex card metadata
- Card-file schemas require manual discipline instead of strong fields
- Large boards can become slow and harder to maintain over time
Best For
Individuals or small teams organizing card-like records in boards
More related reading
Zoho Creator
custom-appsZoho Creator builds custom card-style apps with forms, searchable records, and role-based access for maintaining a card file database.
Workflow Automations with conditional approvals tied to each record
Zoho Creator stands out by turning card-based data entry into fully customizable applications with visual builders and reusable components. It provides form creation, record views, and workflow automations with role-based access controls for structured internal data tracking. The platform also supports integrations through APIs, webhooks, and Zoho apps so card records can feed other systems. It is a strong choice for building lightweight card file workflows, but advanced card-style UX and deep layout control can require more building effort than dedicated card catalog tools.
Pros
- Visual form and view builder for card-style record management
- Workflow automation links approvals, statuses, and notifications to card records
- Granular permissions support secure multi-role card workflows
- Integrations via APIs and webhooks keep card data synced across systems
- Reporting and dashboards summarize card records without exporting
Cons
- Card layout customization can feel limited without extra app logic
- Complex workflows require careful scripting for maintainability
- Performance tuning may be needed for large card datasets
- Cross-app data modeling can become cumbersome for highly normalized catalogs
Best For
Teams building card-based internal tracking apps with workflow automation
Google Sheets
spreadsheet-basedGoogle Sheets can be structured as a card-file table and displayed as card-like layouts using add-ons and templates while staying fully searchable.
Filters and Pivot Tables for fast tag-based retrieval and collection summaries
Google Sheets stands out as a card-file style system because it can store records in a grid and use filters, sorts, and views to navigate large collections. It supports structured data with cell validation, formulas, pivot tables, and macros through Google Apps Script. Collaboration is built in with real-time co-editing and change history, so shared card files remain consistent across users.
Pros
- Filters and sorts turn a large table into a fast card index
- Formulas enable computed fields like status, priority, and summaries
- Data validation enforces consistent card attributes
- Pivot tables summarize collections by tags and categories
- Real-time collaboration keeps shared card files synchronized
Cons
- No true card UI breaks workflows that expect one-record-at-a-time screens
- Scales poorly for heavy logic and large datasets compared with purpose-built apps
- Apps Script customization can add complexity and maintenance overhead
Best For
Small teams building flexible, spreadsheet-based card files with shared collaboration
More related reading
Google Contacts
contactsGoogle Contacts stores contact cards with searchable profiles, labels, and syncing across devices for a basic digital card file.
Live contact sync with Gmail to keep emails and saved contacts aligned
Google Contacts centers on fast contact capture inside the Google account ecosystem and pairs it with Gmail and Google Workspace identity management. It supports contact details like multiple emails, phone numbers, addresses, notes, and relationship fields, plus labels for organization. It also provides contact import and export to move data in and out of other systems.
Pros
- Labels and search make large contact lists easy to navigate
- Bi-directional sync with Gmail contacts keeps updates consistent
- Import and export workflows support common CSV and vCard moves
- Shared contacts enable team-wide address book access
Cons
- Limited custom fields restrict card-style data modeling
- No built-in pipeline stages for sales or relationship tracking
- Offline-first card viewing and editing is not a core strength
Best For
Individuals and teams managing shared address books tied to Google accounts
Evernote
notesEvernote organizes content into notes and notebooks with saved tags and search, supporting card-like personal reference files.
Universal search with OCR makes handwritten and image content retrievable
Evernote stands out with fast note capture across mobile, desktop, and web, turning scattered ideas into searchable cards. It supports handwritten notes, photo capture, and document scans that become indexed content for retrieval. Core workflows rely on notebooks, tags, and saved searches, with powerful full-text search across text, OCR from images, and attachments. Card-file organization is strongest for personal knowledge management rather than rigid, form-based card layouts.
Pros
- Cross-device capture keeps notes available for quick card-style filing
- Full-text search indexes OCR from images and scans for retrieval
- Tags and notebooks support flexible card organization
- Web clipper saves pages and images into the note library
- Attachments stay tied to notes for complete card records
Cons
- Card-style layouts are not as strict as dedicated card-file systems
- Bulk cleanup across many notes can feel slower than database tools
- Complex workflows depend on manual tagging consistency
- Offline edits can be less predictable with large synced libraries
Best For
Individuals managing searchable knowledge notes with photo and scan intake
How to Choose the Right Card File Software
This buyer's guide explains how to select Card File Software for contact-like records, reference libraries, and workflow-driven trackers. It covers Notion, Microsoft Lists, Airtable, Coda, ClickUp, Trello, Zoho Creator, Google Sheets, Google Contacts, and Evernote with concrete feature tradeoffs. It also maps common mistakes to tools that avoid those pitfalls.
What Is Card File Software?
Card File Software stores information as individual records that behave like index cards and makes them easy to scan, filter, and retrieve. The best tools add structured fields, searchable views, and record-to-record links so cards function as a reusable system instead of a flat list. Notion uses database-backed card views with properties, tags, and relationships. Microsoft Lists builds card-style trackers inside Microsoft 365 with filtering, grouping, and Power Automate tied to list item changes.
Key Features to Look For
Card file tools succeed when they combine fast retrieval, structured card data, and the right level of workflow automation for the way records get updated.
Database-backed card views with properties, filters, and sorting
Notion provides database views that expose properties, filters, and sorting directly on card records. Airtable offers card and grid views over customizable records with per-view filtering and sorting. This matters for turning large libraries into quick lookups.
Record relationships that connect cards into networks
Notion supports relational links so cards become connected knowledge units. Airtable delivers relational fields that link records across multiple tables. Coda adds linked tables so related cards and documents stay connected.
Workflow automation triggered by record changes
Microsoft Lists ties card-like list item changes to Power Automate triggers and actions for status updates and alerts. Zoho Creator uses workflow automations with conditional approvals tied to each record. Airtable and Coda also support automations that react to record or field changes.
Card layouts with rich content inside each record
Notion stores rich page content inside each card record so notes, media, and context stay attached to the card. Airtable cards support attachments and custom field layouts. Trello cards also keep checklists, labels, attachments, and due dates on each card.
Structured metadata via custom fields, column types, and validation
ClickUp provides custom fields across boards, lists, and dashboards so cards carry structured metadata like categories and due dates. Microsoft Lists supports rich column types such as tags, dates, choice fields, and person assignments. Google Sheets enables consistent card attributes with cell validation and structured filters.
Search depth including tags, full text, and OCR indexing
Evernote delivers universal search with OCR indexing so handwritten notes and scanned images remain searchable. Google Contacts enables fast contact search by labels across contact profiles and syncing. Evernote is the strongest fit when card files must retrieve content captured as images or scans.
How to Choose the Right Card File Software
Choosing the right tool starts with matching card storage style and retrieval speed to the record complexity and collaboration needs of the use case.
Pick the card data model that matches how records relate
If records must connect across entities, Notion and Airtable lead with database-backed views plus relationships. If card data can stay simple and needs fast grouping, Microsoft Lists and Trello deliver card-like organization with sorting and labels. If card records need to live across tables and dashboards, Coda adds linked tables plus doc-native views.
Match card retrieval to the way people scan information
For scanning card libraries with property-driven views, Notion and Airtable provide sortable and filterable database views. For list-style card scanning tied to roles and Teams usage, Microsoft Lists supports card-like list views with grouping and filtering. For spreadsheet-style card browsing, Google Sheets uses filters and pivot tables to retrieve tag-based collections.
Decide how much automation should move cards for us
If card updates should trigger alerts and assignment changes, Microsoft Lists connects list item changes to Power Automate. If records require approvals and conditional routing, Zoho Creator ties workflow automations to each record. If card workflows must move through steps with lightweight rule automation, Airtable and Coda support automations based on field changes.
Choose the tool that keeps card content attached and searchable
For cards that must store rich notes and media in the same record, Notion keeps page content inside each card. Airtable cards attach files and keep record context together with custom field layouts. Evernote is better when the card file includes photos, document scans, and handwritten notes that depend on OCR search.
Validate collaboration and governance needs with the right ecosystem
Teams that already use Microsoft 365 should use Microsoft Lists for card trackers with Power Automate and Teams-ready collaboration. Shared team curation works well with Airtable due to permissions and shared bases. For teams wanting doc-native dashboards over card records, Coda combines card views with tables and embedded content in one workspace.
Who Needs Card File Software?
Card File Software fits when information must be captured as records that stay searchable and actionable rather than stored as scattered notes or files.
Personal research and interconnected knowledge bases
Notion fits this workflow with database views, card properties, and relational links that build a connected research network. Evernote also fits when the card file emphasizes photo capture, handwritten notes, and OCR-enabled universal search.
Teams managing card-style trackers inside Microsoft 365
Microsoft Lists is built for teams that manage card-based trackers with sorting, filtering, and collaboration in the Microsoft ecosystem. Power Automate triggers and actions tied to list item changes make it strong for status updates, alerts, and approval-style flows.
Teams building relational card files with shared governance
Airtable supports relational fields that link card records across multiple tables, which helps create multi-entity card catalogs. Coda also supports linked tables and formula-powered views for dynamic dashboards over related card data.
Teams and operators who need card-based workflows with structured automation
Zoho Creator supports card-style app creation with workflow automations and conditional approvals tied to each record. ClickUp and Trello also support card-based workflows with structured metadata, rules, and automation through board views and triggers.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several predictable pitfalls show up across card-file tools when the system design fights the tool’s strengths.
Overbuilding complex relationships without a plan for maintainability
Notion can become hard to maintain at scale when schemas and relations grow complex across database views. Airtable and Coda can also require careful planning for complex card relationships so modeling does not slow ongoing updates.
Expecting card-style UX to work like a dedicated database catalog without setup effort
Coda’s card-style workflows can become form-heavy and require careful setup and permissions to avoid workflow friction. Zoho Creator can require more building effort for advanced card-style layout control, especially for highly specific card interfaces.
Treating the card system as a pure file repository instead of a searchable index
Evernote depends on tagging and notebook organization for reliable manual retrieval across many notes and scans. Trello search and indexing can feel limited beyond labels when cards rely on complex metadata instead of strong fields.
Letting boards and workspaces grow without governance
ClickUp workspaces can become harder to maintain when many custom fields and automation rules accumulate. Trello boards can become slow and harder to maintain over time when large numbers of cards grow without a disciplined schema.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features accounted for 0.4 of the final score because card views, relational links, and automation capabilities determine how well records work as a card file. Ease of use accounted for 0.3 because card-file adoption depends on fast filtering, scanning, and low-friction daily handling. Value accounted for 0.3 because the system must deliver practical card-file workflow outcomes rather than just flexible storage. The overall rating is a weighted average of those three sub-dimensions using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Notion separated itself from lower-ranked options by scoring strongly in features with database views that combine sortable properties, filters, and relationships in one card-file system.
Frequently Asked Questions About Card File Software
Which card-file tool works best for relational records that behave like an interconnected knowledge base?
Notion fits this need because database views store each card as a record with properties, tags, and relationships to other cards. Coda supports similar relational linking with tables and doc-native views that render card fields into repeatable layouts.
Which option maps most directly to an index-card style workflow with simple fields and fast filtering?
Trello matches index-card behavior through boards, lists, and cards with labels, checklists, attachments, and due dates. Google Sheets offers a grid-based card file with filters, sorts, and views that keep large collections navigable.
What tool supports cross-system automation when card status changes?
Microsoft Lists integrates tightly with Microsoft Power Automate so list item changes can trigger assignments, approvals-style flows, and alerts in Teams. ClickUp also automates card movement across custom views using rules and integrations built into the workspace.
Which platform is strongest for contact-style card files that stay synced with email?
Google Contacts is built for contact cards with multiple emails, phone numbers, addresses, labels, and relationship notes tied to Google accounts. Gmail-aligned contact behavior keeps saved contacts and outreach details consistent through live sync.
Which tool is best for building lightweight card-based apps with role access and conditional workflows?
Zoho Creator supports customizable card-based record entry inside fully built applications, with workflow automations that include conditional approvals. It pairs those record flows with role-based access controls so card-level data stays governed.
Which option handles attachments and scans as first-class content inside the card record?
Evernote treats captured images and document scans as searchable content by applying OCR, then ties them to notebooks and tags for retrieval. Airtable also supports attachments on records so card files can store documents alongside structured fields and views.
Which card-file tool is most useful for teams that need dashboard views and structured metadata?
ClickUp provides dashboards plus kanban and list views that organize cards by status, priority, owner, and custom fields. Airtable adds governance for shared card curation through relational fields, per-view filtering, sorting, attachments, and granular permissions.
What common problem appears when teams outgrow a basic card layout, and which tool helps most?
A frequent failure mode is cards that start as freeform notes but later require consistent fields, filtering, and cross-record linking. Notion and Coda address this by converting card layouts into database-style records and views with properties, relationships, and templated structure.
Which platform is best when the goal is rapid card capture with universal search across text and images?
Evernote is designed for fast capture across mobile, desktop, and web, then uses full-text search with OCR so handwritten and image content becomes searchable. Google Sheets can help with searchable structure through filterable fields, but it does not provide the same OCR-first capture workflow.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 general knowledge, Notion stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
General Knowledge alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of general knowledge tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare general knowledge tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.