Commissioned Research
Top 7 Best Callback Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Customer Experience In Industry

Top 7 Best Callback Software of 2026

Top 10 best callback software tools ranked by pricing, features, and call control for contact centers. Includes CallPage, Talkdesk, NICE CXone.

26 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Callback software schedules return calls from web or contact-center queues and routes them through configured call flows. This ranked list helps analysts and operators compare automation depth, integration paths, and governance controls like RBAC and audit logs across vendors without marketing claims.

CallPage is the best fit for contact-center teams that need consistent website callbacks delivered with queue status and CRM context, while Talkdesk works better if your routing must follow real agent state and queue logic inside a full cloud platform.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

CallPage

Queue position notification for callback callers keeps intent from degrading while agents wait to pick up.

Best for: Fits when contact-center teams need consistent callback delivery with queue status and CRM context.

2

Talkdesk

Editor pick

Queue-aware callback orchestration that uses contact-center routing context to choose the right next step.

Best for: Fits when contact-center teams need callback routing governed by real agent state and queue logic.

3

NICE CXone Callback

Editor pick

Callback contacts reuse CXone queue and agent-state orchestration for consistent SLA and assignment behavior.

Best for: Fits when contact centers already running NICE CXone need governed callback routing and reporting.

Comparison Table

1
CallPageBest overall
SMB
9.1/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.7/10
Overall
3
8.4/10
Overall
4
8.0/10
Overall
5
API-first
7.7/10
Overall
6
7.4/10
Overall
7
7.1/10
Overall
#1

CallPage

SMB

CallPage adds website callback widgets that connect visitors with sales teams.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Queue position notification for callback callers keeps intent from degrading while agents wait to pick up.

CallPage is built around the end-to-end callback lifecycle, starting with a web callback widget that captures call-back number and context, then progressing through queued delivery to an agent. It includes queue management features such as automated callback queue handling and queue position notification so callers get status instead of repeated re-dial attempts. Telephony integrations connect the callback flow to agent calling, with call-back pickup controlled by the same operational workflow that receives web requests.

A tradeoff is that deeper contact center routing behaviors depend on the fit between the vendor’s telephony integration and the team’s existing ACD or IVR design. Teams should use CallPage when callback volume is high and missed-call handling needs consistent SLA tracking plus retry logic across both instant and scheduled scenarios.

Pros
  • +Queue-aware callback delivery reduces missed-lead handoffs
  • +Instant and scheduled callback handling covers multiple lead intents
  • +CRM context can be carried into agent pickup workflows
  • +Automation for callback retry logic lowers manual agent workload
Cons
  • –Routing depth depends on how well telephony integration matches the ACD
  • –Advanced configuration requires careful alignment of callback SLAs and queues
  • –Some call analytics depend on integration completeness
Use scenarios
  • Call-center operations teams

    Queue-backed callbacks during peak lead surges

    Fewer abandoned callback attempts

  • Sales ops teams

    CRM-linked callbacks for missed inquiries

    Faster lead re-engagement

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Customer support teams

    Scheduled callbacks for non-urgent tickets

    Higher contact rate

    Scheduled callback workflows batch outreach into availability windows to reduce after-hours dialing pressure.

  • IT and telephony admins

    Automated callback retry logic integration

    More callbacks completed

    Retry behavior and callback routing are managed inside the telephony-connected workflow to keep outcomes consistent.

Best for: Fits when contact-center teams need consistent callback delivery with queue status and CRM context.

#2

Talkdesk

enterprise

Talkdesk supports callback requests and queue management within its cloud contact-center platform.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Queue-aware callback orchestration that uses contact-center routing context to choose the right next step.

Talkdesk supports callback as a managed contact-center workflow rather than a standalone widget, which helps when missed calls must convert into queue-aware callbacks. The system can coordinate callback outcomes with agent status and call control logic, so customers can be offered callback when waiting would otherwise be visible. Integration depth tends to matter most for teams already using Talkdesk for voice, screen pop, reporting, and contact-center routing.

A tradeoff appears when organizations need rapid, lightweight callback deployment without adopting the surrounding contact-center operating model. Talkdesk fits best when callback SLAs must align with queue position logic and skills-based routing, and when teams already have CRM and CTI integrations in place.

Talkdesk is also a strong fit for multi-site operations because time-zone and routing rules can be configured to keep callback scheduling consistent across regions.

Pros
  • +Callback routing stays aligned with agent availability state
  • +Queue context can feed skills-based assignment logic
  • +Enterprise governance supports multi-environment administration
  • +CRM and CTI integrations support agent screen pop and updates
Cons
  • –Callback rollout depends on adopting broader contact-center configuration
  • –Advanced behavior requires deeper workflow and routing setup
Use scenarios
  • Contact center operations teams

    Reduce missed-call abandonment with callbacks

    Higher callback conversion rates

  • Customer service managers

    Meet callback SLA by schedule rules

    More predictable service levels

Show 2 more scenarios
  • CRM integration owners

    Sync callback outcomes into records

    Cleaner contact history

    CRM and telephony integrations can update customer context for consistent agent handoffs.

  • Contact center IT and architects

    Integrate callback with telephony control

    Centralized call control

    Provisioning and workflow configuration connect callback events to voice routing and reporting systems.

Best for: Fits when contact-center teams need callback routing governed by real agent state and queue logic.

#3

NICE CXone Callback

enterprise

Cloud contact center platform offering automated callback scheduling for inbound queues.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.4/10
Standout feature

Callback contacts reuse CXone queue and agent-state orchestration for consistent SLA and assignment behavior.

NICE CXone Callback is designed for contact centers already standardizing on NICE CXone, because callback interactions map into the same queue, agent state, and reporting surfaces used for live calls. Callback requests can be created from events like web callback widget submissions or queue callbacks, then scheduled into an outbound callback run based on defined timing and routing logic. Callback outcomes feed back into the broader analytics and disposition workflows, so callback contacts do not sit outside QA and operational reporting.

A tradeoff appears when teams want a lightweight callback widget with minimal dependencies, because configuration typically assumes access to the CXone environment and its telephony integration layer. The best fit is an environment that needs consistent callback SLA tracking, controlled retry behavior, and agent assignment that respects skills-based routing and availability rules.

Pros
  • +Callback outcomes align with NICE CXone reporting and call dispositions
  • +Routing logic can follow the same agent availability and skills rules
  • +Automation supports event-driven callback creation and scheduled callback execution
  • +CTI-driven screen pop behavior stays consistent across callback and live calls
Cons
  • –Implementation depends on CXone telephony and operational configuration
  • –Widget-only deployments can feel heavy compared with standalone callback tools
  • –Complex routing requires careful queue and skill configuration discipline
Use scenarios
  • Contact center operations leaders

    Queue callback with SLA tracking

    Consistent callback SLA visibility

  • Telephony and contact center admins

    Missed-call recovery workflow

    Higher reconnect rate after misses

Show 1 more scenario
  • CRM integration teams

    Callback-driven CTI screen pop

    Faster agent handling

    Callback moments can reuse CTI context so agents see CRM data during callback handling.

Best for: Fits when contact centers already running NICE CXone need governed callback routing and reporting.

#4

Genesys Cloud CX

enterprise

Cloud contact center solution with built-in virtual queue and callback capabilities.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use8.1/10
Value7.8/10
Standout feature

Workflow-driven callback orchestration lets queue context and agent state shape retries, timing, and next actions.

Genesys Cloud CX positions callback as part of a broader contact-center suite with voice, digital channels, and enterprise-grade routing. Callback flows can be driven by automated routing logic that ties queue context, agent availability, and caller context into consistent outcomes.

Pros
  • +Callback logic integrates with queue, routing, and agent availability behaviors
  • +Automation via workflows and actions supports conditional callback handling
  • +Extensibility through CX APIs supports tying callbacks into CRM and internal systems
  • +Enterprise RBAC and audit visibility support multi-team governance
Cons
  • –Complex routing and workflow designs require careful configuration discipline
  • –Callback user experiences can lag behind simpler widget-focused deployments

Best for: Fits when contact-center teams need callback to follow enterprise routing rules and CRM-connected workflows.

#5

Twilio Voice

API-first

API-first communications platform enabling programmatic callback scheduling.

7.7/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

TwiML-driven call control plus status callbacks enables application-managed callback queues with real-time call-state synchronization.

Twilio Voice places outbound calls and receives inbound calls over programmable telephony with SIP trunking and voice API endpoints. Call routing logic is built through TwiML instructions that can trigger workflows for status callbacks, call recording control, and dynamic call handling.

Pros
  • +TwiML webhooks let callback workflows react to live call status events
  • +Programmable SIP trunking supports telephony connectivity beyond mobile voice
  • +Recording and disposition controls can be driven from application logic
  • +Extensible event callbacks reduce custom polling for queue state
Cons
  • –Requires engineering for call-flow logic, webhook endpoints, and state persistence
  • –Callback SLA behavior depends on custom queueing and retry orchestration
  • –Debugging voice webhooks is harder when retries and concurrency overlap

Best for: Fits when teams need programmable call-back routing wired to internal systems and CRM events.

#6

Ringostat

SMB

Ringostat combines call tracking, analytics, and website callback functionality.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Queue-aware callback recovery with analytics that ties callback results back to routing and agent availability signals.

Ringostat focuses on callback routing and telephony-adjacent analytics for contact-center workflows built around missed-call handling and queue recovery. It provides a callback request flow tied to agent availability signals and queue position behavior, plus reporting that maps contact outcomes back to routing and performance. Admin control centers on configuration of routing logic and integration settings needed to connect inbound capture to outbound dialing or callback delivery.

Pros
  • +Callback request flow is designed to tie into queue and agent availability
  • +Reporting connects callback outcomes to routing decisions for operational review
  • +Telephony integration options support both inbound capture and callback delivery
  • +Automation controls reduce manual handling during missed-call recovery
Cons
  • –Initial configuration work is heavier than standalone callback widget deployments
  • –Complex routing changes can require careful coordination with telephony settings
  • –API coverage is strong, but deeper governance features take planning
  • –Workflow behavior depends on accurate integration data from connected systems

Best for: Fits when teams need callback routing tied to queue state and operational reporting, not just capture widgets.

#7

Vonage Contact Center

enterprise

Cloud contact center product with queued callback functionality.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Workflow-driven call orchestration built around Vonage communications infrastructure for consistent queue and handling behavior.

Vonage Contact Center pairs voice contact-center capabilities with Vonage’s communications APIs, which makes telephony integration a core part of the design rather than a late add-on. Call handling can be orchestrated through contact-center workflows that control routing, agent interaction, and post-call outcomes.

Pros
  • +Communications API alignment reduces friction for telephony integration projects
  • +Workflow configuration supports queue-based handling and consistent call routing
  • +Reporting covers operational visibility for contact-center performance monitoring
  • +Channel provisioning supports multi-channel contact center deployments
Cons
  • –Callback-specific routing may need careful workflow design to meet SLAs
  • –Advanced governance and audit expectations require deliberate role and permission setup
  • –Integration depth depends on matching existing CRM and CTI patterns
  • –Customization around web callback UX can require engineering effort

Best for: Fits when callback workflows depend on tight telephony integration and contact-center reporting.

Conclusion

After evaluating 7 callback software, CallPage stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
CallPage

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right Callback Software

Callback software coordinates missed-call and queue-backed requests so contact-center teams can place calls back in a controlled way instead of losing intent while agents are busy.

This guide covers CallPage, Talkdesk, NICE CXone Callback, Genesys Cloud CX, Twilio Voice, Ringostat, and Vonage Contact Center, with emphasis on queue context, callback orchestration, and workflow or API control for fast routing decisions.

Callback Software for managed missed-call and queue-backed callback routing

Callback software captures a caller callback request and schedules or executes the next outbound call based on contact-center routing context, agent availability, and queue rules.

CallPage is built around queue-aware callback delivery that gives callback callers queue position notification while aligning callback timing with agent handoff behavior. Talkdesk focuses on callback orchestration that uses contact-center routing context to choose the next step based on agent state and queue logic.

Callback orchestration, routing context, and control surface

Queue-backed callback only works when the product ties a missed-call request to the same queue logic used for live calls. These capabilities decide whether callbacks preserve intent or devolve into blind redial attempts.

For contact-center teams, the callback experience depends on workflow control, event-driven status updates, and reporting aligned to routing outcomes. The tools below differ most in how they expose queue state to the callback flow and how much engineering effort the workflow requires.

  • Queue position notification for callback callers

    CallPage provides queue position notification for callback callers so intent does not degrade while agents wait to pick up. This feature directly supports callback delivery consistency for queue-backed inbound overflow.

  • Agent state and queue-aware callback orchestration

    Talkdesk orchestrates callbacks using contact-center routing context and agent availability state to choose the next step. This keeps callback routing aligned with live staffing rather than a fixed schedule.

  • Queue and agent-state reuse inside an existing contact center

    NICE CXone Callback reuses CXone queue and agent-state orchestration so callback contacts follow governed SLA and assignment behavior. Outcomes align with NICE CXone reporting and call dispositions for teams already standardized on CXone.

  • Workflow-driven callback retries and next actions

    Genesys Cloud CX uses workflow-driven callback orchestration where queue context and agent state shape retries, timing, and next actions. Conditional callback handling fits enterprise routing rules tied to CRM-connected workflows.

  • TwiML call control with real-time status callbacks

    Twilio Voice uses TwiML-driven call control and status callbacks to support application-managed callback queues with real-time call-state synchronization. This design shifts core callback queue logic to the application layer via webhooks.

  • Queue-aware callback recovery with routing-linked reporting

    Ringostat builds callback recovery around queue state and agent availability signals. Reporting ties callback outcomes back to routing decisions for operational review.

  • Communications API alignment for contact-center workflows

    Vonage Contact Center provides workflow-driven call orchestration aligned with Vonage communications infrastructure. The configuration supports queue-based handling and consistent call routing built for contact-center reporting.

Choose callback tools by routing authority and automation control depth

The fastest way to narrow options is to decide where routing authority should live. Some products treat the callback experience as a queue-native flow controlled by contact-center routing logic, while others treat callback handling as an application workflow that consumes live call events.

The second decision is how teams want to build exceptions. Workflows can support conditional timing and retries, but widget-style deployments can feel heavier when they must replicate every operational rule. The steps below compare these paths across CallPage, Talkdesk, NICE CXone Callback, Genesys Cloud CX, Twilio Voice, Ringostat, and Vonage Contact Center.

  • Pick queue-native callback delivery when queue status must be visible

    Choose CallPage when callback callers need queue position notification tied to the queue experience instead of silent waiting. This is a strong fit when missed-call handling must preserve intent during agent pickup delays.

  • Choose agent-state governed routing when staffing changes drive callback outcomes

    Choose Talkdesk when callback orchestration must stay aligned with agent availability state and contact-center routing context. This approach fits environments that already treat skills assignment and next-step decisions as live operational logic.

  • Standardize on CXone when callback outcomes must match CXone reporting and dispositions

    Choose NICE CXone Callback when the contact center already runs NICE CXone and expects callback reporting to match call dispositions. This reduces variance between how live calls and callbacks are governed and reviewed.

  • Choose workflow-driven orchestration when retries and timing need enterprise rules

    Choose Genesys Cloud CX when callback behavior must follow enterprise routing rules with queue context and agent-state-driven retries. This is best when conditional callback handling belongs in automation workflows connected to CRM-centered processes.

  • Choose engineering-first callback queues when custom call-state logic must be owned by the application

    Choose Twilio Voice when the callback flow must be programmable through TwiML and synchronized via status callbacks. This route fits teams willing to build call-flow logic, webhook endpoints, and state persistence rather than rely on a prebuilt callback queue engine.

  • Choose operational reporting tied to recovery when teams need callback outcome analysis

    Choose Ringostat when routing-linked reporting must connect callback outcomes to queue and agent availability signals. This is a practical fit when callback recovery and operational review are part of ongoing routing optimization.

Who should buy Callback Software

Callback software fits teams that must recover missed calls without breaking routing governance. The buying signal is whether callback delivery must reflect queue position, agent availability, and operational assignment logic.

These tools vary in how much workflow control is native versus custom-built. The segments below map specific tool strengths to contact-center environments and implementation expectations.

  • Contact-center teams running queue-based inbound overflow and requiring queue-aware callback delivery

    CallPage fits teams that need queue position notification while aligning callback timing with agent handoff behavior. This supports consistent callback delivery when callers wait for agent pickup.

  • Contact-center teams that govern routing through agent state and skills logic

    Talkdesk fits teams that want callback routing governed by real agent state and queue logic with skills-based assignment support. This reduces mismatches between live routing and callback next steps.

  • Enterprises already standardized on NICE CXone for reporting and operational governance

    NICE CXone Callback fits teams that need callback outcomes aligned with NICE CXone reporting and call dispositions. It reuses queue and agent-state orchestration to keep SLA and assignment behavior consistent.

  • Enterprises that need enterprise routing rules implemented as automation workflows tied to CRM processes

    Genesys Cloud CX fits teams that want callback logic built as workflows and actions driven by queue context and agent state. It supports conditional callback handling shaped by enterprise routing requirements.

  • Engineering-led teams building custom callback flows with application-managed queue logic

    Twilio Voice fits teams that can implement TwiML call control and webhook-driven status synchronization. It is a fit when callback SLA behavior depends on custom queueing and retry orchestration.

Common Callback Software buying pitfalls

Callback failures usually come from mismatched routing expectations. Teams expect callbacks to follow queue governance, but select tools that require extra configuration alignment or custom engineering for core behaviors.

The pitfalls below map to the most frequent mismatch patterns seen across CallPage, Talkdesk, NICE CXone Callback, Genesys Cloud CX, Twilio Voice, Ringostat, and Vonage Contact Center.

  • Assuming callback routing will match the ACD without validating telephony integration fit

    CallPage warns that routing depth depends on how well telephony integration matches the ACD, so callback SLA and queue alignment require careful setup. Talkdesk has a similar constraint because callback rollout depends on adopting broader contact-center configuration.

  • Selecting a workflow-rich platform without assigning ownership for configuration discipline

    Genesys Cloud CX can require careful configuration discipline for complex routing and workflow designs. Ringostat and Vonage Contact Center also expect heavier coordination when routing changes must stay consistent with telephony settings.

  • Choosing a widget-style deployment when reporting and governance must mirror the contact center

    NICE CXone Callback depends on CXone telephony and operational configuration to keep callback behavior aligned with reporting. Teams that need callback outcomes to match call dispositions should standardize within CXone rather than bolt on an independent widget.

  • Overlooking the engineering cost of application-managed callback queues

    Twilio Voice requires engineering for call-flow logic, webhook endpoints, and state persistence. Callback SLA behavior depends on custom queueing and retry orchestration, so teams must plan for implementation capacity.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated CallPage, Talkdesk, NICE CXone Callback, Genesys Cloud CX, Twilio Voice, Ringostat, and Vonage Contact Center using feature depth at 40% weight, ease of setup and operations at 30% weight, and value for contact-center use at 30% weight. CallPage ranked highest because queue position notification for callback callers and queue-aligned callback timing directly address missed-call intent retention while agents wait.

Talkdesk ranked strongly when agent availability state and routing context governed callback orchestration with skills-aware next steps. Genesys Cloud CX ranked by workflow-driven retries and conditional automation that tie queue context to next actions.

Frequently Asked Questions About Callback Software

How do CallPage and Talkdesk handle instant versus scheduled callback requests differently?
CallPage routes web callback requests into a hosted call-back flow that supports both instant and scheduled handling with agent back-office pickup. Talkdesk ties callback scheduling and queueing to agent availability and real-time routing state, so the next step follows contact-center routing logic rather than only request timing.
Which tools provide queue position or queue-aware callback state to the caller?
CallPage includes queue position notification for callback callers so intent stays attached during wait time. Ringostat focuses on queue-aware callback recovery and reports callback outcomes against routing and performance signals.
How do Genesys Cloud CX and NICE CXone Callback connect callback flows to existing contact-center routing?
Genesys Cloud CX drives callback orchestration through enterprise routing logic that uses queue context, agent availability, and caller context. NICE CXone Callback reuses CXone queue and agent-state orchestration for SLA-aligned callback assignment and consistent reporting.
What breaks when Twilio Voice is used without a web or application-side callback queue?
Twilio Voice can place and control calls with TwiML and can synchronize state via status callbacks, but it does not provide a prebuilt contact-center callback widget. Without an application-managed queue and missed-call handling workflow, external systems like CRM event triggers cannot reliably coordinate callback retry logic and call-state transitions.
When is queue-triggered or missed-call recovery behavior more appropriate in CXone Callback versus Ringostat?
NICE CXone Callback supports queue-triggered callbacks and missed-call recovery flows inside the CXone operational model. Ringostat is built around missed-call handling and callback routing recovery with analytics that map outcomes back to routing and agent availability signals.
How do admin controls differ between CallPage and Talkdesk for multi-environment governance?
CallPage emphasizes governance over operational retry behavior and call outcomes tied to lead context, so admins control how callbacks get reattempted when outcomes do not match expectations. Talkdesk supports governance across environments through contact-center routing alignment, so admins manage callback behavior as part of the broader agent state and skills routing stack.
Which platforms support extensibility via APIs for callback workflow orchestration?
Genesys Cloud CX provides extensibility through APIs and integrations that connect callback requests to CRM and workflow systems. Twilio Voice uses voice API endpoints and event-driven webhooks that let application systems implement callback routing logic and status synchronization.
How do security and identity controls typically affect callback deployments in Genesys Cloud CX versus NICE CXone Callback?
Genesys Cloud CX uses enterprise administration controls for users and call handling, which matters when callback flows must align with shared routing and access policies. NICE CXone Callback centralizes configuration inside the NICE CXone contact-center orchestration model, which reduces drift between callback scripts and the surrounding operational configuration.
What data migration work is usually required before migrating callback history and lead context into Talkdesk or CallPage?
CallPage ties callbacks to lead context and operational retry behavior, so migrating existing lead records requires mapping the callback request fields to the hosted flow’s context model. Talkdesk requires aligning callback context with contact-center routing data so historical lead-to-queue expectations map to the agent availability and routing rules used for callback delivery.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.