GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Finance Financial ServicesTop 10 Best Balance Sheet Preparation Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Balance Sheet Preparation Software picks, including QuickBooks Online, Xero, and Sage Intacct, to choose the best fit.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
QuickBooks Online
Bank and credit card reconciliation that validates ledger balances feeding the Balance Sheet report
Built for small to mid-size teams needing accurate balance sheets from reconciled ledgers.
Xero
Editor pickBank feeds with categorization rules that streamline the inputs behind Balance Sheet balances
Built for accounting teams preparing monthly Balance Sheets with bank reconciliation automation.
Sage Intacct
Editor pickAutomated close workflow with configurable approvals and audit trail for period-end balance readiness
Built for finance teams preparing audited balance sheets with strong controls and consolidation.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates the top balance sheet preparation software options across integration depth, data model design, and the automation and API surface used for posting and adjustments. It also compares admin and governance controls such as RBAC, audit log coverage, and configuration options that affect provisioning, extensibility, and throughput. The entries include QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, and other leading systems to show tradeoffs for different accounting workflows and data schemas.
QuickBooks Online
accounting suiteGenerates balance sheets from categorized transactions and supports audit-ready bookkeeping workflows for month-end close.
Bank and credit card reconciliation that validates ledger balances feeding the Balance Sheet report
QuickBooks Online stands out for turning balance sheet prep into a workflow tied to real accounting transactions, not a standalone reporting form. It pulls Balance Sheet data from the general ledger, supports account type mapping, and lets users adjust reporting periods and presentation settings to match internal statements.
Built-in reconciliation and audit trails help verify balances before export or sharing. Strong integrations with other business systems reduce manual rekeying of source data that feeds the balance sheet.
- +Balance Sheet report auto-populates from mapped chart of accounts and ledger balances.
- +Account categorization and class and location tracking support clearer balance sheet structure.
- +Bank and credit card reconciliation improves balance accuracy before reporting.
- +Period controls enable month-end balance snapshots for multi-period review.
- –Incorrect chart of accounts mapping can produce misleading balance sheet line totals.
- –Advanced formatting for nonstandard statement layouts requires workarounds.
- –Interpreting equity rollups can be harder when historical adjustments are frequent.
Small business bookkeepers
Month-end balance sheet preparation from ledger
Faster month-end close
Accounting managers at midmarket firms
Standardize balance sheet formats across entities
Consistent reporting across entities
Show 2 more scenarios
Finance teams with audit requirements
Validate balances before external review
Reduced audit adjustments
Uses reconciliation history and audit trails to trace balance sheet numbers to source transactions.
Controllers managing integrations
Feed balances from connected systems
Lower data-entry errors
Reduces manual rekeying by pulling transaction activity from connected apps into ledger balances.
Best for: Small to mid-size teams needing accurate balance sheets from reconciled ledgers
More related reading
Xero
accounting suiteProduces balance sheets from real-time ledger data with configurable accounts and reporting exports for financial statement preparation.
Bank feeds with categorization rules that streamline the inputs behind Balance Sheet balances
Xero stands out for connecting bank transactions to accounting workflows with real-time categorization support. Balance sheet preparation is driven by its structured chart of accounts, double-entry bookkeeping, and reporting tools like the Balance Sheet report.
Automation features such as bank feeds and recurring journals reduce manual rekeying while keeping balances audit-ready. Collaboration controls support approvals and data visibility across accounting teams handling month-end close.
- +Bank feeds speed up reconciliations that feed Balance Sheet accuracy
- +Double-entry ledgers keep assets, liabilities, and equity consistent
- +Balance Sheet reporting links directly to chart of accounts and journals
- +Recurring transactions reduce month-end journal preparation effort
- –Balance sheet setup depends heavily on correct chart of accounts design
- –Complex consolidations require add-ons and extra configuration effort
- –Some close workflows still need manual checks to confirm classifications
Small business accountants
Month-end balance sheet close workflow
Faster, audit-ready balance sheet close
In-house finance teams
Reclassify transactions for accurate equity
Cleaner equity and liability balances
Show 2 more scenarios
Accounting firms
Standardized chart of accounts mapping
Consistent month-end reporting outputs
Consistent double-entry structures support repeatable balance sheet preparation across clients.
Bookkeeping staff
Reduce manual journal rekeying
Less manual rekeying workload
Recurring journals cut rework when preparing month-end balances for review.
Best for: Accounting teams preparing monthly Balance Sheets with bank reconciliation automation
Sage Intacct
enterprise financeCreates balance sheets through automated general ledger processing with approvals and control features for financial reporting.
Automated close workflow with configurable approvals and audit trail for period-end balance readiness
Sage Intacct stands out with strong built-in financial controls and automated close workflows that support balance sheet preparation end to end. It provides configurable account structures, recurring journal capabilities, and detailed subledger-to-ledger reporting that helps reconcile balances.
Balance sheet preparation benefits from audit trails, role-based approvals, and consolidation support for multi-entity reporting. Advanced reporting and export options help standardize review packages across reporting periods.
- +Automated close workflows reduce manual balance sheet reconciliation effort
- +Subledger-to-ledger reporting improves traceability for balance sheet line items
- +Role-based approvals and audit trails strengthen period-end signoff controls
- +Consolidation features support multi-entity balance sheet preparation
- –Setup of chart of accounts mapping and consolidation structures takes time
- –Advanced reporting requires user training to build correct balance rollups
- –Workflow configuration can feel heavy for simple balance sheet needs
Controller and close teams
Prepare monthly balance sheet close packages
Faster, cleaner close documentation
Financial accountants and reconciliations
Reconcile subledger balances to GL
Reduced reconciliation discrepancies
Show 2 more scenarios
Consolidation and reporting analysts
Consolidate intercompany balance sheet positions
Consistent consolidated balance sheets
Multi-entity consolidation features standardize reporting structures and support multi-entity balance sheet review.
Audit and compliance reviewers
Validate approvals and journal history
Simplified audit evidence
Role-based approvals and detailed audit trails provide evidence for balance sheet preparation controls.
Best for: Finance teams preparing audited balance sheets with strong controls and consolidation
More related reading
NetSuite
enterprise ERPGenerates balance sheets from its financial management and general ledger modules with role-based controls for statement production.
Subledger-driven financial statements that post directly into the General Ledger
NetSuite stands out for combining General Ledger accounting with ERP data needed to produce a balance sheet from real transactional activity. Journal entries can be driven by automated subledger processes, including fixed asset accounting, intercompany, and multi-entity structures. Balance sheet preparation benefits from audit trails, role-based permissions, and built-in reporting tools that pull from a single financial data model.
- +Single financial data model links transactions to balance sheet accounts.
- +Role-based approvals and audit trails support balance sheet period close.
- +Multi-entity and intercompany capabilities reduce manual consolidation work.
- +Fixed asset subledger posts depreciation directly into the ledger.
- –Modeling chart of accounts and accounting rules can be implementation-heavy.
- –Balance sheet reporting often needs configuration to match exact reporting formats.
- –Advanced workflows and permissions require admin expertise to tune.
Best for: Mid-market finance teams preparing audited balance sheets from ERP data
Google Sheets
spreadsheet workpapersSupports collaborative balance sheet templates with formulas, named ranges, and exportable reporting layouts.
Conditional formatting with formula-driven checks to highlight unbalanced balance-sheet totals
Google Sheets stands out for building balance-sheet templates directly in a web spreadsheet with live collaboration. It supports double-entry style layouts using formulas for account rollups, subtotals, and balance checks. Pivot tables and filters help summarize ledger-style data by account, entity, or period, while conditional formatting flags mismatches like assets not equaling liabilities plus equity.
- +Fast template creation for balance sheet layouts with totals and variance formulas
- +Pivot tables quickly summarize account balances by period and account hierarchy
- +Real-time collaboration supports review workflows with comments and versioned edits
- –No dedicated accounting rules engine for automated balance validation
- –Data import and reconciliation need careful spreadsheet controls to prevent formula drift
- –Complex multi-entity consolidation becomes hard to maintain at scale
Best for: Finance teams preparing spreadsheet-based balance sheets with collaborative review
Prophix
financial performance softwarePerforms close and consolidation workflows that prepare balance sheet statements from structured inputs and allocation rules.
Guided close workflows with validation and approvals for journal and balance data
Prophix stands out for structured close and consolidation workflows that connect planning, journal preparation, and financial reporting. Balance sheet preparation is supported through guided data collection, reconciliation logic, and repeatable month-end processes. The solution emphasizes automation for adjustments and reporting outputs, which reduces manual spreadsheet assembly during close cycles.
- +Workflow-driven close supports consistent balance sheet preparation
- +Strong reconciliation and data validation reduces trial-balance cleanup
- +Automation for adjustments supports repeatable month-end reporting outputs
- +Consolidation and reporting capabilities extend beyond balance sheet prep
- –Setup and configuration can be heavy for teams without process standardization
- –Reporting and rules tuning can require specialized admin effort
- –Less spreadsheet-like flexibility for users expecting direct worksheet editing
Best for: Mid-size finance teams standardizing month-end close and reconciliations
More related reading
Board
planning and consolidationManages financial planning and reporting with balance sheet models, budgeting workflows, and reporting output.
Reusable financial models with dimension mapping for standardized balance sheet reporting
Board centers balance sheet preparation around a spreadsheet-like workspace plus guided financial modeling and reporting for faster consolidation of financial statements. It supports multi-entity structures, standardized charts of accounts, and structured adjustments that can be reused across reporting periods.
Data can be imported and then mapped to reporting dimensions to drive consistent balance sheet outputs. Collaboration features help teams review numbers before publishing reports.
- +Structured chart of accounts mapping reduces balance sheet inconsistencies
- +Reusable financial models speed recurring month-end close tasks
- +Collaboration and review workflow supports controlled balance sheet sign-off
- +Dimension-based reporting helps reconcile multi-entity submissions
- –Setup of reporting structures requires time and modeling discipline
- –Complex adjustments can feel harder to audit than row-level spreadsheets
Best for: Finance teams preparing monthly balance sheets across multiple entities
Workiva
enterprise reportingConnects data lineage and controls so balance sheet statements can be prepared and maintained with governed reporting workflows.
Wdata Linkages that connect narrative and tables to underlying source data
Workiva distinguishes itself with document-to-data connectivity that links statements, schedules, and disclosures into a controlled workflow. It supports collaborative preparation for financial reporting content and emphasizes traceability across revisions and source data. Teams use structured authoring, validation workflows, and audit-ready change management to assemble balance sheet information with fewer manual reconciliation loops.
- +Strong traceability from source data to financial statement narratives and tables
- +Workflow approvals and collaborative editing reduce document churn
- +Built-in validation helps catch inconsistencies during balance sheet preparation
- –Setup of links and data structures can require significant implementation time
- –Grid-style modeling feels heavier than basic spreadsheet workflows
- –Best results depend on disciplined template and governance practices
Best for: Reporting teams needing linked, auditable balance sheet preparation workflows
More related reading
BlackLine
close and reconciliationAutomates financial close activities including balance sheet account reconciliations and supports statement-ready evidence trails.
Account Reconciliation workflow with task assignments, approvals, and audit-ready evidence tracking
BlackLine stands out for end-to-end finance close and reconciliation workflows that extend into balance sheet preparation through structured control points. The platform supports account reconciliations, journal entry automation, and task management that keep ownership and evidence attached to balance sheet movements.
It also emphasizes compliance-ready close processes with audit trails across approvals, exceptions, and workflow status. For balance sheet preparation, these capabilities align best with teams standardizing how accounts are analyzed, reconciled, and adjusted during the close.
- +Workflow-driven balance sheet preparation with audit trails and approvals
- +Account reconciliation tooling supports evidence capture and exception handling
- +Close automation reduces manual journal preparation effort
- +Integration-friendly process design helps standardize account handling
- –Setup effort can be heavy for organizations with many custom account rules
- –Workflow configuration complexity can slow early adoption
- –Not a lightweight tool for small teams with simple balance sheets
Best for: Mid-market finance teams standardizing reconciliations and journal controls during close
Certinia
close managementSupports financial close management with workflows for balance sheet reconciliations and compliance-oriented reporting preparation.
Governed close workflow orchestration with approval trails for balance sheet sign-offs
Certinia stands out with its approach to enterprise financial close that connects planning, workflow, and approvals across teams. It supports balance sheet close workflows through structured tasking, status tracking, and audit-ready controls. The platform also emphasizes integration with enterprise systems so balance sheet data can be reconciled and validated inside governed processes.
- +Enterprise close workflows that coordinate balance sheet owners and reviewers
- +Audit-oriented workflow controls with clear approval trails and status visibility
- +Integration-friendly design for pulling balance sheet data into close activities
- –Setup for tailored close processes can require significant administration
- –Workflow configuration complexity can slow adoption for smaller teams
- –Less direct balance sheet preparation functionality than specialized finance apps
Best for: Enterprise finance teams standardizing balance sheet close workflows across departments
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 finance financial services, QuickBooks Online stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Balance Sheet Preparation Software
This buyer's guide covers balance sheet preparation tools across QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, NetSuite, Google Sheets, Prophix, Board, Workiva, BlackLine, and Certinia.
It focuses on integration depth, data model fit, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls, with tool-by-tool examples tied to month-end close and audit-readiness workflows.
Balance sheet preparation tools that turn ledger truth into statement-ready outputs
Balance sheet preparation software connects source accounting data to reporting structures that produce balance sheet statements for period close, review, and sign-off. These tools reduce rekeying by pulling balances from a chart of accounts and general ledger rather than relying on manually assembled spreadsheet totals.
QuickBooks Online and Xero produce balance sheet outputs directly from ledger activity and reconciliation workflows, while Sage Intacct and NetSuite extend that model with approvals, audit trails, and multi-entity control structures.
Evaluation criteria for statement outputs, ledger mapping, and governed close workflows
Balance sheet prep succeeds when the data model holds chart of accounts structure, period controls, and audit-ready evidence from the ledger to the statement lines.
Integration depth matters because bank feeds, reconciliation, and subledger posting determine how quickly balances become reliable enough for review packages. Automation and the API surface also matter because recurring journals, close workflows, and export pipelines reduce close-cycle throughput bottlenecks.
Ledger-driven balance sheet population
QuickBooks Online auto-populates balance sheet lines from mapped chart of accounts and ledger balances, which reduces manual assembly during month-end close. NetSuite links a single financial data model to balance sheet accounts through its general ledger and subledger processes, which cuts reconciliation churn when ERP data drives the statements.
Chart of accounts mapping and presentation controls
QuickBooks Online exposes account type mapping and period controls that support month-end snapshots, but incorrect chart of accounts mapping can misstate line totals. Xero also depends heavily on correct chart of accounts design, so consistent account structure is a gating factor for reliable exports.
Bank feed and reconciliation automation feeding balances
Xero uses bank feeds with categorization rules to streamline the inputs that behind balance sheet balances. QuickBooks Online adds bank and credit card reconciliation that validates ledger balances feeding the Balance Sheet report, which improves audit readiness before export or sharing.
Close workflows with approvals and audit trails
Sage Intacct provides an automated close workflow with configurable approvals and an audit trail for period-end balance readiness. BlackLine adds an account reconciliation workflow with task assignments, approvals, and audit-ready evidence tracking, which strengthens sign-off traceability across exceptions.
Subledger-to-ledger traceability for statement lines
Sage Intacct offers detailed subledger-to-ledger reporting that improves traceability for balance sheet line items. NetSuite pushes fixed asset accounting and intercompany and multi-entity processes into the ledger through subledger-driven financial statements, which supports audit-friendly evidence trails.
Governed reporting data connectivity for linked statements
Workiva focuses on traceability and workflow governance by linking narrative and tables to underlying source data through Wdata linkages. This connected document and data workflow fits reporting teams that need linked balance sheet preparation with validation and revision history.
Choose a tool by matching its data model, automation surface, and control depth to the close process
Start by matching the data model to where the balance sheet inputs originate. If reconciliation and bank feeds drive most balances, Xero and QuickBooks Online fit because their Balance Sheet outputs are tied to reconciled ledgers.
Then match governance and admin controls to the review cycle. If the workflow requires approvals, evidence capture, and audit trails across accounts and entities, Sage Intacct, BlackLine, and Certinia align with those controls.
Anchor the workflow to the real source of balances
If balance sheets come from bank and card activity with month-end reconciliation, start with Xero and QuickBooks Online because bank feeds and reconciliation validate the balances feeding the Balance Sheet report. If balance sheets must reflect ERP subledger posting such as fixed assets and intercompany transactions, NetSuite provides subledger-driven statement production that posts into the general ledger.
Validate chart of accounts fit and reporting structure mapping
When a statement depends on consistent account types and categories, QuickBooks Online can auto-populate from mapped chart of accounts but can misstate totals if mapping is wrong. Xero and Board both place a heavy reliance on correct chart of accounts and modeling discipline, so account taxonomy gaps show up as reporting inconsistencies.
Require automation around recurring entries and period close checkpoints
If recurring transactions and automated close readiness reduce manual journal prep, Sage Intacct supports recurring journal capabilities and automated close workflows with audit trails. Prophix also centers close and consolidation workflows with guided reconciliation logic that drives repeatable month-end reporting outputs.
Size governance needs by approvals, evidence capture, and audit trail depth
For controlled period-end signoff, use Sage Intacct because it combines role-based approvals with audit trails. For evidence-heavy reconciliation ownership at the account level, BlackLine attaches task assignments, approvals, exceptions, and evidence to reconciliation movements for balance sheet preparation.
Plan for integration and automation extensibility based on output dependencies
If balance sheet preparation must stay connected to source tables and narratives with validation workflows, Workiva’s Wdata linkages support governed connectivity and traceability. If spreadsheet-like collaboration with formula checks is acceptable for review workflows, Google Sheets can produce conditional formatting checks to flag unbalanced balance sheet totals, but it lacks a dedicated accounting rules engine.
Match admin effort tolerance to workflow complexity
If the organization can invest time in chart mapping and consolidation structures, Sage Intacct supports multi-entity consolidation with workflow controls. If admin capacity is limited, QuickBooks Online’s direct ledger-to-report pipeline can be faster to operate, while Certinia requires tailored enterprise close process administration and workflow configuration for adoption.
Which teams get the most value from governed balance sheet preparation
Different balance sheet prep workflows emphasize different failure points, including reconciliation accuracy, chart of accounts design quality, and approval evidence depth. Tool choice should track where the close process breaks and which controls the reporting cycle requires.
QuickBooks Online and Xero fit teams that need statement-ready outputs derived from reconciled ledgers, while Sage Intacct, BlackLine, and Certinia fit teams that need governed close orchestration across owners, reviewers, and audit trails.
Small to mid-size teams building accurate balance sheets from reconciled ledgers
QuickBooks Online fits this segment because bank and credit card reconciliation validates ledger balances feeding the Balance Sheet report. Xero is also suitable because bank feeds with categorization rules reduce manual rekeying into balances.
Accounting teams running monthly close with bank-driven automation and role-based review
Xero fits teams that depend on bank reconciliation automation because its Balance Sheet reporting links directly to chart of accounts, journals, and recurring transactions. QuickBooks Online also fits because period controls create month-end balance snapshots and reconciliation improves accuracy before export or sharing.
Finance teams that must produce audited balance sheets with approvals, audit trails, and consolidation support
Sage Intacct fits teams that need automated close workflows with configurable approvals and an audit trail. NetSuite also fits mid-market finance teams when subledger processes such as fixed assets and intercompany postings must drive balances inside a single financial data model.
Mid-market finance teams standardizing account reconciliation evidence and journal control points during close
BlackLine fits teams that need account reconciliation workflows with task assignments, approvals, exceptions handling, and audit-ready evidence tracking. Prophix fits teams that want guided close workflows with validation and repeatable month-end outputs tied to structured close inputs.
Enterprise reporting teams coordinating linked statements and sign-off workflows across departments
Workiva fits teams that need Wdata linkages to connect narrative and tables to underlying source data with validation and workflow approvals. Certinia fits enterprise finance teams that standardize close workflow orchestration with approval trails and integration-friendly reconciliation inside governed processes.
Pitfalls that derail balance sheet prep controls and statement accuracy
Balance sheet preparation breaks when the statement output depends on fragile mapping or when close governance is under-specified for the review cycle. Several tools show predictable failure modes tied to chart design, workflow configuration, or workbook maintenance.
Common mistakes concentrate around chart of accounts mapping quality, spreadsheet-based reconciliation drift, and workflow setup effort that delays effective use during close cycles.
Treating chart of accounts mapping as a one-time setup
QuickBooks Online and Xero both rely on correct chart of accounts design for accurate balance sheet line totals. Incorrect mapping creates misleading line totals in QuickBooks Online and complex setup dependence in Xero, so the mapping process must be validated against period outputs.
Using spreadsheets without controlling formula drift and reconciliation evidence
Google Sheets can flag unbalanced totals with conditional formatting checks, but it lacks a dedicated accounting rules engine for automated validation. Prohibit unmanaged edits and enforce disciplined spreadsheet controls because formula drift and manual import reconciliation can undermine balance sheet trust.
Skipping evidence capture and approvals when audit readiness is required
BlackLine is built around account reconciliation workflow evidence with task assignments, approvals, and exception handling, so it fits when evidence trails matter. Without that kind of workflow governance, Sage Intacct and Certinia risk ending close cycles with approvals that lack traceable reconciliation ownership.
Underestimating implementation effort for consolidation structures and workflow configuration
Sage Intacct requires time to set up chart of accounts mapping and consolidation structures, and it needs user training for advanced reporting rollups. NetSuite and Certinia also require admin expertise to tune accounting rules and configure enterprise close workflows, so workflow design capacity must be planned before first close.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, NetSuite, Google Sheets, Prophix, Board, Workiva, BlackLine, and Certinia using criteria tied to balance sheet preparation mechanics, including features for ledger-driven balance sheet outputs, ease of operating those outputs, and value for supported close and review workflows. Each tool received a weighted average score where features carried the most weight, and ease of use and value each contributed a substantial share. The ranking reflects editorial research and criteria-based scoring grounded in the included tool capabilities, not private benchmark experiments or hands-on lab testing.
QuickBooks Online separated itself from lower-ranked tools by pairing a mapped chart of accounts with a Balance Sheet report that auto-populates from ledger balances and by adding bank and credit card reconciliation that validates the balances feeding the report. That combination raised the features factor because it connects reconciliation automation to statement outputs, and it improved the operational fit for small to mid-size teams that need month-end balance accuracy with fewer manual steps.
Frequently Asked Questions About Balance Sheet Preparation Software
How do QuickBooks Online and Xero differ in where Balance Sheet numbers come from?
Which tool best supports audited, end-to-end balance sheet preparation with approval workflows?
What integrations or APIs support automation for balance sheet preparation?
How does RBAC and audit logging show up when preparing balance sheets in Sage Intacct versus BlackLine?
Which products are strongest for multi-entity consolidation during balance sheet preparation?
What is the practical tradeoff between using Google Sheets and using an accounting system like NetSuite for balance sheets?
How do Prophix and Workiva handle traceability between statement content and underlying data?
How should teams plan data migration when moving balance sheet preparation from spreadsheets to systems like Board or Workiva?
What configuration controls matter most when setting up account structures and journal automation for balance sheets in Sage Intacct versus QuickBooks Online?
How does extensibility differ between Certinia and Workiva for governed balance sheet close workflows?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Finance Financial Services alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of finance financial services tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare finance financial services tools→