GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
AI In IndustryTop 8 Best Automatic Digitizing Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Automatic Digitizing Software tools for speed, stitch quality, and ease, with ranked picks for small studios and pros.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Adobe Illustrator
Image Trace with adjustable tracing settings for turning artwork into vectors
Built for designers preparing vectors for embroidery digitizers and stitch conversion pipelines.
Fusion 360
Editor pickIntegrated CAM with adaptive toolpaths and simulation for digitized CAD geometry
Built for engineering teams digitizing 3D parts for milling and prototyping workflows.
Fusion 360
Editor pickIntegrated CAM with adaptive toolpaths and simulation for digitized CAD geometry
Built for engineering teams digitizing 3D parts for milling and prototyping workflows.
Related reading
Comparison Table
The comparison table benchmarks automatic digitizing workflows across common design and CAM ecosystems, including Illustrator, AutoCAD, Fusion 360, CAMWorks, RoboDK, and other tools. It compares integration depth, the underlying data model and schema for vector or CAD entities, automation and API surface for batch processing, and admin and governance controls such as RBAC and audit log coverage. The goal is to map tradeoffs in throughput, configuration, and extensibility so teams can predict how each tool fits their provisioning and production pipeline.
Adobe Illustrator
vector automationVectorizes raster artwork with Image Trace and provides automated workflows for creating digitized vector graphics for production.
Image Trace with adjustable tracing settings for turning artwork into vectors
Adobe Illustrator stands out with its mature vector editing engine and file formats that digitizing workflows rely on for clean artwork. It supports vector creation and cleanup tools like Image Trace, anchor point editing, and precise path construction that translate into embroidery-style outlines.
It can automate parts of the workflow using scripting and repeatable actions, but it does not provide a dedicated, end-to-end stitch generation pipeline inside the design canvas. For automatic digitizing, it works best as an upstream artwork tool that exports to stitch or embroidery-specific software.
- +Image Trace converts raster artwork into editable vector shapes quickly
- +Path editing tools enable precise outlines and clean geometry for digitizing
- +Scripting and actions automate repetitive cleanup and layout adjustments
- –Illustrator does not generate stitch-ready embroidery output directly
- –Image Trace often needs manual cleanup to avoid messy nodes
- –Automatic digitizing depends on external embroidery software for stitch logic
Embroidery digitizers and pattern makers
Clean vector outlines from scanned artwork
Fewer manual redraws
Small apparel customization studios
Standardize artwork for repeat client orders
More predictable production
Show 2 more scenarios
Brand teams creating embroidery-ready assets
Convert logo artwork into stitch inputs
Faster artwork handoff
Vector exports from Illustrator provide controlled shapes that downstream embroidery tools can process.
Marketing and design coordinators
Prepare scalable designs for multiple formats
Reduced rework cycles
Illustrator maintains editable vector geometry so designs can be adapted for different hoop sizes.
Best for: Designers preparing vectors for embroidery digitizers and stitch conversion pipelines
More related reading
Fusion 360
3D digitizingConverts imported scan data into usable sketches and curves through automated import tools for model digitizing workflows.
Integrated CAM with adaptive toolpaths and simulation for digitized CAD geometry
Fusion 360 stands out by combining CAD modeling, CAM machining workflows, and simulation in one authoring environment. It supports digital-to-manufacturing digitizing through surface and mesh handling, then drives toolpath generation for cutting or milling from 3D data.
Automatic digitizing is strongest when scanning or imported geometry is cleaned and converted into CAD-ready surfaces, then routed through CAM operations. It is less focused on automated 2D pattern digitizing for textiles and sports than on engineering-grade geometry preparation and machining-ready outputs.
- +CAD-to-CAM workflow converts digitized geometry into executable toolpaths
- +Mesh and surface tools help repair scanned data into CAD form
- +Built-in simulation supports validation before cutting
- –Automating digitizing steps depends on data quality and manual repair work
- –Workflow can feel heavy for simple, pattern-focused digitizing needs
- –Learning curve is steep for reliable mesh-to-surface conversion
CNC machinists and programmers
Toolpaths from imported 3D mesh models
Reduced re-modeling time
Product engineers and design teams
Scan-to-CAD conversion for part redesign
Faster iteration on parts
Show 2 more scenarios
Prototyping teams
Reverse engineering a physical component
Quicker prototype turnaround
Uses mesh and surface handling to create machining-ready geometry from digitized references.
Manufacturing engineering departments
Digitized inspection data to machining plan
Lower production planning risk
Converts digitized geometry into CAM setups and verifies outcomes using simulation tools.
Best for: Engineering teams digitizing 3D parts for milling and prototyping workflows
Fusion 360
3D digitizingConverts imported scan data into usable sketches and curves through automated import tools for model digitizing workflows.
Integrated CAM with adaptive toolpaths and simulation for digitized CAD geometry
Fusion 360 stands out by combining CAD modeling, CAM machining workflows, and simulation in one authoring environment. It supports digital-to-manufacturing digitizing through surface and mesh handling, then drives toolpath generation for cutting or milling from 3D data.
Automatic digitizing is strongest when scanning or imported geometry is cleaned and converted into CAD-ready surfaces, then routed through CAM operations. It is less focused on automated 2D pattern digitizing for textiles and sports than on engineering-grade geometry preparation and machining-ready outputs.
- +CAD-to-CAM workflow converts digitized geometry into executable toolpaths
- +Mesh and surface tools help repair scanned data into CAD form
- +Built-in simulation supports validation before cutting
- –Automating digitizing steps depends on data quality and manual repair work
- –Workflow can feel heavy for simple, pattern-focused digitizing needs
- –Learning curve is steep for reliable mesh-to-surface conversion
CNC machinists and programmers
Toolpaths from imported 3D mesh models
Reduced re-modeling time
Product engineers and design teams
Scan-to-CAD conversion for part redesign
Faster iteration on parts
Show 2 more scenarios
Prototyping teams
Reverse engineering a physical component
Quicker prototype turnaround
Uses mesh and surface handling to create machining-ready geometry from digitized references.
Manufacturing engineering departments
Digitized inspection data to machining plan
Lower production planning risk
Converts digitized geometry into CAM setups and verifies outcomes using simulation tools.
Best for: Engineering teams digitizing 3D parts for milling and prototyping workflows
More related reading
CAMWorks
manufacturing digitizingUses geometry recognition on imported models to accelerate programming from digitized parts into toolpaths for manufacturing.
CAMWorks Machining Recognizer for automatic feature detection and toolpath generation
CAMWorks stands out for translating 3D CAD models into manufacturable CAM toolpaths and digitized machining workflows with minimal manual rework. It supports automatic feature recognition and machining parameter generation to speed up NC programming and reduce repetitive setup work.
Strong associativity to CAD geometry helps keep toolpaths synchronized when design changes occur. Toolpath simulation and verification features support safer digitizing-to-machine handoff.
- +Automatic feature recognition accelerates CAM programming from 3D geometry
- +Tight CAD associativity helps maintain toolpath updates after design edits
- +Integrated verification and simulation improves confidence before machining
- –Best results depend on clean CAD geometry and consistent feature intent
- –Workflow complexity increases for specialized machining strategies
- –Digitizing-to-toolpath mapping can require more setup for nonstandard parts
Best for: Teams digitizing CAD into CNC toolpaths with strong CAD associativity
RoboDK
industrial automationAutomates robot path generation from imported CAD and digitized workcell geometry for industrial process digitizing.
Robot machining and process toolpath execution with offline simulation and collision checking
RoboDK stands out for turning digitized geometry into robot-ready toolpaths across many robot brands and 3D workcells. Core capabilities include importing CAD and point clouds, generating offline robot programs, simulating robot motion with collision checking, and producing machining or painting paths from models.
It also supports process-focused workflows like laser, plasma, welding, milling, and additive-style toolpath execution by linking geometric data to robot actions. The digitizing-to-automation pipeline is practical, but full automatic conversion from raw scan data into optimized robot toolpaths depends heavily on preparation and modeling quality.
- +Offline programming with CAD imports and robot motion simulation
- +Collision checking and cycle time estimates for safe path validation
- +Supports many applications like milling, welding, and painting toolpaths
- +Links digitized geometry to robot programs for repeatable production
- –Automatic digitizing from raw scans needs manual cleanup and modeling
- –Toolpath tuning can require significant parameter knowledge
- –Setup of stations, fixtures, and robot calibration takes time
- –Complex scenes may slow simulation and iteration
Best for: Manufacturers digitizing CAD or cleaned scans into robot toolpaths
More related reading
Vectorizer AI
AI vectorizationAutomatically converts bitmap images into vector formats using AI-based tracing for fast digitizing of line art.
AI-assisted raster-to-vector tracing optimized for cleaner embroidery outlines
Vectorizer AI focuses on turning raster images into clean vector artwork intended for embroidery workflows. It supports converting designs into stitch-ready shapes by reducing noisy edges and preserving usable outlines for digitizing. The tool emphasizes automation from artwork to production-ready geometry rather than manual drafting inside a full digitizing editor.
- +Automates raster-to-vector cleanup to speed embroidery layout preparation
- +Preserves outlines better than basic image tracing for stitch pathways
- +Generates consistent geometry that digitizers can refine quickly
- +Reduces manual edge cleanup time for logos and artwork scans
- –Embroidery stitch settings still require follow-up control
- –Fine textures can simplify too aggressively for high-detail designs
- –Bold fills may need manual adjustments for density and stability
Best for: Embroidery digitizers needing fast vector cleanup from logos and scans
Photo to Vector
automated tracingTransforms raster images into vector outlines using automated vector tracing to speed up digitizing for graphics workflows.
Vector path tracing that converts artwork edges into clean shapes for digitizing workflows
Photo to Vector stands out by turning raster artwork into vector paths that can feed embroidery digitizing workflows. It focuses on automation for shape tracing and cleanup so users can move from images to stitch-ready geometry without manual redrawing. The tool’s core capabilities center on vectorization and edge shaping that support downstream converting for machine embroidery layouts.
- +Automates image-to-vector conversion for embroidery-ready outlines
- +Produces clean paths that reduce manual redrawing work
- +Supports faster iteration on graphic shapes and edges
- –Works best on high-contrast images with clear boundaries
- –Limited control over stitch logic compared with full digitizers
- –May require manual touch-ups for complex artwork
Best for: Embroidery teams needing automated vector tracing before digitizing
More related reading
Silhouette Studio
cut-path digitizingTraces images into cut-ready paths for digitizing designs into vector-like results for production tooling.
Auto-trace converts raster images into editable vectors for fast digitizing workflows
Silhouette Studio stands out by turning scanned images into ready-to-cut and stitchable designs through tracing workflows built for Silhouette cutters and embroidery compatibility. The software supports automatic vector tracing, line cleanup, and parameter tuning so outlines can become digitizing-ready paths.
It also includes workspace tools for scaling, layout, and exporting files for stitching workflows. Automation is strongest for simple artwork like logos and shapes, while complex textures and dense artwork need more manual attention.
- +Automatic tracing converts images into clean cut paths quickly
- +Design scaling and layout tools speed up multi-part workflows
- +Embroidery export workflows fit common Silhouette-driven processes
- +Preview-oriented editing reduces guesswork during path cleanup
- –Automatic digitizing coverage is weaker for complex artwork
- –Dense fills and textures still require manual stitch planning
- –Feature set is narrower than full dedicated digitizing suites
- –Stitch-property controls can feel indirect versus embroidery-first tools
Best for: Small teams digitizing simple logos and shapes for stitching workflows
Conclusion
After evaluating 8 ai in industry, Adobe Illustrator stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Automatic Digitizing Software
This buyer's guide covers eight automatic digitizing and digitizing-adjacent tools: Adobe Illustrator, AutoCAD, Fusion 360, CAMWorks, RoboDK, Vectorizer AI, Photo to Vector, and Silhouette Studio. Each option is mapped to real workflow behavior like raster-to-vector conversion, CAD-to-CAM automation, and robot toolpath generation from imported geometry.
The guide compares integration depth, data model fit, automation and API surface coverage where available in the product workflow, and admin governance controls at the level each tool supports. The emphasis stays on speed, output quality, and operational ease for producing production-ready vector or machine-ready toolpaths.
Automatic digitizing workflows that convert artwork or geometry into production-ready paths
Automatic digitizing software turns raster artwork, scan data, or CAD geometry into intermediate vectors, stitch-ready outlines, or machining and robot toolpaths using automated tracing, feature recognition, or CAD-to-CAM conversion. It reduces manual redrawing time by producing geometry structures that downstream systems can interpret, whether that downstream is embroidery digitizers or CNC and robot programming.
Adobe Illustrator illustrates the raster-to-vector path approach with Image Trace that creates editable shapes for later digitizing conversion, while Fusion 360 illustrates the CAD and CAM pipeline approach with mesh and surface handling plus toolpath generation. These tools typically serve embroidery digitizers, CAD and manufacturing teams, and production engineers who need repeatable throughput from images, scans, or imported geometry.
Evaluation criteria for automation, integration depth, and governance readiness
Automatic digitizing tools succeed when the automation produces geometry that matches the target machine or workflow expectations. The evaluation should focus on how inputs map into an explicit data model that can be edited, validated, and reused.
Integration depth and automation surface matter because stitching logic, toolpath logic, and verification steps often live in different products. Admin and governance controls also determine whether workflows can be reproduced safely across teams, especially when automation depends on configuration and repeatable actions.
Raster-to-vector tracing with controllable geometry output
Vectorizer AI and Photo to Vector convert bitmap images into vector paths intended for embroidery workflows, and they reduce edge cleanup time by preserving usable outlines. Adobe Illustrator’s Image Trace adds adjustable tracing settings plus path editing tools like anchor point editing, but manual cleanup is still needed to prevent messy nodes.
Stitch-ready readiness versus geometry-only conversion
Vector tracing tools like Vectorizer AI, Photo to Vector, and Silhouette Studio generate outlines that digitizers can refine, but they still require follow-up stitch-property control. Adobe Illustrator also stops at vector artwork and does not generate stitch-ready embroidery output directly inside the design canvas.
CAD-to-toolpath automation with simulation for validation
AutoCAD and Fusion 360 support a CAD workflow where digitized or imported geometry is cleaned into CAD-ready surfaces and then routed through CAM operations that produce executable toolpaths. Fusion 360 and AutoCAD add built-in simulation for validation before cutting, which directly reduces unsafe handoff risk.
Feature recognition and associativity for edit propagation
CAMWorks accelerates NC programming by using machining parameter generation and feature recognition on imported models. CAMWorks also keeps toolpaths synchronized through CAD associativity, which reduces rework when design changes occur.
Offline automation for robot process toolpaths with collision checking
RoboDK converts imported CAD and point clouds into robot-ready toolpaths across many robot brands and 3D workcells. RoboDK’s offline simulation includes collision checking and cycle time estimates, which supports repeatable production even when full automatic conversion from raw scans still needs modeling cleanup.
Data preparation sensitivity and cleanup workload predictability
Automation quality degrades when inputs contain noise, low contrast, or nonstandard geometry, which forces manual repair and parameter tuning. Fusion 360 and AutoCAD depend on data quality for reliable mesh-to-surface conversion, while RoboDK depends on preparation and modeling quality for converting raw scan data into optimized robot toolpaths.
Pick the right digitizing automation by matching automation logic to the target machine
Selection should start with the target output type, because tracing tools and CAD-to-CAM tools automate different steps. A tool that outputs clean outlines is not the same as a tool that outputs verified toolpaths.
The second step is to map where automation logic lives in the workflow, because Adobe Illustrator automates vector creation while CAMWorks automates machining feature recognition and RoboDK automates robot motion programs. The final step is to verify configuration and governance needs by checking whether the workflow is reproducible via scripts, actions, recognizers, or explicit workspace exports.
Define the downstream system that must interpret the output
If downstream is an embroidery digitizer that expects stitch-property control, tools like Vectorizer AI and Photo to Vector are designed to produce embroidery-oriented outlines that digitizers can refine. If downstream is CNC or milling, AutoCAD and Fusion 360 focus on turning cleaned CAD geometry into executable toolpaths through CAM operations.
Choose the automation style that matches the input source
For logos and line art from bitmap images, start with Adobe Illustrator’s Image Trace or Silhouette Studio’s auto-trace that converts images into editable vectors for fast layout cleanup. For digitizing CAD or imported 3D parts, use CAMWorks or Fusion 360 because both generate machining outputs from CAD geometry with feature recognition or CAD-to-CAM conversion.
Estimate cleanup and data repair effort from how the tool handles imperfect inputs
Expect manual touch-ups when tracing introduces messy nodes in Adobe Illustrator Image Trace, especially on noisy artwork. Expect mesh repair and conversion effort in Fusion 360 and AutoCAD when imported scan data requires reliable surface conversion, and expect modeling and station setup overhead in RoboDK when converting raw scans into optimized robot toolpaths.
Validate before execution using built-in simulation and verification where available
For CNC or milling pipelines, Fusion 360 and AutoCAD add simulation to validate the digitized-to-machine handoff before cutting. For robotics, RoboDK provides offline robot motion simulation plus collision checking and cycle time estimates, which supports safer toolpath execution without needing machine trials.
Require configuration reproducibility via automation surfaces
If repeatability depends on reusable actions, Adobe Illustrator supports scripting and repeatable actions around Image Trace and cleanup steps. If repeatability depends on recognizing consistent machining features, CAMWorks uses machining recognizer logic to generate parameters and toolpaths from CAD geometry.
Match governance needs to workflow boundaries and export expectations
When output is geometry intended for a separate stitching system, governance centers on consistent exports and trace settings, which tools like Silhouette Studio and Vectorizer AI support through their tracing and cleanup workspaces. When output is executable toolpaths, governance centers on CAD associativity, simulation validation, and verification steps, which CAMWorks, Fusion 360, and AutoCAD support through their CAD-linked workflows.
Which teams should use which automatic digitizing automation
Different digitizing stacks automate different steps, so audience fit depends on whether the team needs vector outlines, stitch-ready geometry support, or machining or robot toolpaths. The most productive choices align automation to the target output and validation method.
The segments below reflect the tool best-fits based on the intended workflow focus, from embroidery vector cleanup to engineering-grade CAD-to-toolpath conversion and production robot programming.
Embroidery digitizers who need fast vector cleanup from logos and scans
Vectorizer AI and Photo to Vector are built to turn raster images into embroidery-oriented vector paths with automated cleanup so digitizers can refine stitch settings afterward. Adobe Illustrator also works for designers preparing vectors for embroidery digitizers, but it does not generate stitch-ready embroidery output directly inside the design canvas.
Small teams digitizing simple logos and shapes for Silhouette cutter workflows
Silhouette Studio uses auto-trace to create editable vectors for fast cleanup and includes scaling and layout tools for multi-part workflows. The automatic coverage is strongest for simpler artwork, and dense textures still need manual attention.
Engineering teams digitizing 3D parts for milling and prototyping
AutoCAD and Fusion 360 are designed for CAD and CAM workflows, where digitized or imported geometry is cleaned into CAD-ready surfaces and then routed to CAM operations. Both support simulation for validation before cutting, which reduces handoff risk for machining.
CNC teams that rely on CAD feature stability and toolpath synchronization
CAMWorks fits teams digitizing CAD into CNC toolpaths because it uses automatic feature recognition and machining parameter generation to accelerate NC programming. CAMWorks maintains tight associativity so toolpaths update after design edits.
Manufacturers turning CAD or cleaned workcell geometry into robot process programs
RoboDK targets offline robot programming from imported CAD and point clouds across many robot brands and workcells. Collision checking and cycle time estimates support validation, while fully automatic conversion from raw scans still requires manual cleanup and modeling.
Common selection and workflow mistakes that break automation expectations
Automation fails when inputs and target outputs are mismatched or when the organization assumes stitch logic or toolpath logic is generated inside the same canvas. Several tools intentionally automate only part of the pipeline, so governance and handoffs matter.
The pitfalls below are derived from recurring constraints like geometry-only outputs, reliance on input quality, and workflow heaviness for cases the tool is not optimized for.
Expecting stitch logic from vector tracing tools
Vectorizer AI, Photo to Vector, and Silhouette Studio focus on automated vector tracing and outlines, not on full stitch-property generation. Adobe Illustrator also stops at vector creation and export workflows, so stitch logic must be handled in a downstream digitizing tool.
Using CAD-to-CAM tools for pattern-focused textile digitizing
AutoCAD and Fusion 360 are tuned for engineering-grade geometry preparation and machining-ready outputs, so automation can feel heavy for 2D pattern digitizing use cases. Fusion 360 and AutoCAD depend on clean mesh-to-surface conversion steps that add manual repair when scan inputs are messy.
Assuming automatic conversion works well on noisy scans and complex scenes
RoboDK can automate robot path generation from imported geometry, but automatic conversion from raw scans depends heavily on cleanup and modeling quality. Adobe Illustrator’s Image Trace often needs manual cleanup to avoid messy nodes, especially when raster edges are noisy.
Ignoring simulation and verification gaps for executable outputs
Toolpath production should use simulation and verification steps before execution, which Fusion 360 and AutoCAD provide for cutting workflows. RoboDK provides offline simulation with collision checking for robot motion, so skipping that validation creates avoidable production risk.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Adobe Illustrator, AutoCAD, Fusion 360, CAMWorks, RoboDK, Vectorizer AI, Photo to Vector, and Silhouette Studio using criteria centered on features that directly drive automatic digitizing throughput, ease of using the automation steps, and value in reducing manual cleanup or reprogramming effort. We rated each tool on those three themes and produced an overall weighted average in which features carry the most weight, then ease of use and value each contribute the same amount. This scoring reflects editorial research against each tool’s documented workflow behavior, including what it automates in tracing, recognizers, CAD-to-CAM conversion, or robot programming.
Adobe Illustrator separated itself by pairing Image Trace with adjustable tracing settings and mature path editing tools like anchor point editing, which raised automation quality for raster-to-vector conversion and supported repeatable cleanup actions. That strength improved the features score most, because it directly reduces manual edge work while still producing editable vectors that downstream embroidery digitizers can refine.
Frequently Asked Questions About Automatic Digitizing Software
Which tools in the list generate embroidery-ready geometry automatically from raster artwork?
When should Automatic Digitizing Software be chosen for engineering digitizing rather than textile pattern digitizing?
How does Adobe Illustrator fit an automatic digitizing pipeline if it does not generate stitches inside the design canvas?
What is the practical difference between Vectorizer AI and Silhouette Studio for automated vector cleanup?
Which tools support automation through offline simulation and collision checking for robot or machine workflows?
For teams with changing CAD designs, which software keeps digitized toolpaths synchronized?
Which tool type is best for converting scanned geometry into automation-ready outputs with minimal manual remeshing?
How should teams compare Vector path automation tools with CAD and CAM tools when choosing for throughput?
What admin and access control capabilities matter when deploying automatic digitizing workflows across teams?
Which products are most extensible when integration needs require scripting or pipeline automation?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
AI In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of ai in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare ai in industry tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.