
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Audio Routing Software of 2026
Top 10 Audio Routing Software picks ranked for studios and live rigs. Compare Pyramix, TotalMix FX, Studio One, and more.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Merging Technologies Pyramix
Modular routing matrix for deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring
Built for studios needing deterministic multichannel routing with tight monitoring control.
RME TotalMix FX
TotalMix FX routing matrix with independent per-output monitor mixes
Built for rME-based studios needing advanced monitor routing and repeatable internal mixes.
PreSonus Studio One
Studio One Console with monitor send and cue routing for live recording and overdubs
Built for studio engineers routing audio between software, interfaces, and cues in one DAW.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates audio routing software used in recording studios and live control rooms, including Merging Technologies Pyramix, RME TotalMix FX, PreSonus Studio One, Steinberg Nuendo, Steinberg Cubase, and additional options. It breaks down how each tool handles routing and monitoring, including signal flow design, device integration, latency behavior, and workflow fit for tracking, mixing, and playback.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Merging Technologies Pyramix Pyramix routes and mixes multi-channel audio for studio and broadcast workflows using flexible I/O mapping and advanced mixing engines. | pro studio | 8.8/10 | 9.2/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 |
| 2 | RME TotalMix FX TotalMix FX performs low-latency audio routing and mixing for RME hardware by mapping inputs to outputs with per-channel processing. | hardware mixing | 8.3/10 | 8.9/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | PreSonus Studio One Studio One includes channel routing, bus and I/O management for flexible signal paths between virtual instruments, tracks, and audio interfaces. | DAW routing | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 4 | Steinberg Nuendo Nuendo supports multi-route audio workflows with buses, sends, and I/O channel configuration for complex production routing. | DAW routing | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 5 | Steinberg Cubase Cubase provides extensive audio channel and bus routing with customizable mixer paths for multi-track production signal flow. | DAW routing | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 6 | Soundscape by Audiokinetic Soundscape enables spatial audio routing and mixing for interactive audio by controlling signal paths from emitters to output. | spatial audio | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 7 | Voicemeeter VB-Audio Voicemeeter routes multiple audio sources to selectable outputs using virtual mixer strips and device patching. | virtual mixer | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 8 | Soundflower Soundflower creates virtual audio devices on macOS and allows applications to route audio between apps for recording and mixing. | virtual audio | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 9 | Audio Hijack Audio Hijack captures and routes audio streams with channel-by-channel rules and virtual outputs for downstream processing. | routing automation | 8.4/10 | 9.1/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 10 | Loopback Rogue Amoeba Loopback routes macOS audio by connecting apps and devices to virtual channels with flexible mix and resampling. | virtual audio | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.7/10 |
Pyramix routes and mixes multi-channel audio for studio and broadcast workflows using flexible I/O mapping and advanced mixing engines.
TotalMix FX performs low-latency audio routing and mixing for RME hardware by mapping inputs to outputs with per-channel processing.
Studio One includes channel routing, bus and I/O management for flexible signal paths between virtual instruments, tracks, and audio interfaces.
Nuendo supports multi-route audio workflows with buses, sends, and I/O channel configuration for complex production routing.
Cubase provides extensive audio channel and bus routing with customizable mixer paths for multi-track production signal flow.
Soundscape enables spatial audio routing and mixing for interactive audio by controlling signal paths from emitters to output.
VB-Audio Voicemeeter routes multiple audio sources to selectable outputs using virtual mixer strips and device patching.
Soundflower creates virtual audio devices on macOS and allows applications to route audio between apps for recording and mixing.
Audio Hijack captures and routes audio streams with channel-by-channel rules and virtual outputs for downstream processing.
Rogue Amoeba Loopback routes macOS audio by connecting apps and devices to virtual channels with flexible mix and resampling.
Merging Technologies Pyramix
pro studioPyramix routes and mixes multi-channel audio for studio and broadcast workflows using flexible I/O mapping and advanced mixing engines.
Modular routing matrix for deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring
Pyramix stands out for its audio routing and processing workflow built around a high-channel-count studio control surface and deterministic routing behavior. The system integrates routing, monitoring, and signal processing in a way that supports multichannel production pipelines, not just simple device switching. It also works well for complex studio layouts where consistent latency handling and configurable workflows matter during recording, mixing, and playback.
Pros
- Studio-grade routing for complex multichannel signal paths
- Deterministic monitoring and latency-consistent workflow during production
- Tight integration between routing controls and audio processing tasks
Cons
- Advanced routing depth increases setup time for new teams
- Editing large routing configurations can feel less streamlined
Best For
Studios needing deterministic multichannel routing with tight monitoring control
More related reading
RME TotalMix FX
hardware mixingTotalMix FX performs low-latency audio routing and mixing for RME hardware by mapping inputs to outputs with per-channel processing.
TotalMix FX routing matrix with independent per-output monitor mixes
TotalMix FX stands out because it provides deep, matrix-style routing and mixing directly inside RME hardware control, not as a generic software mixer. It supports flexible input and output routing, per-channel DSP processing, monitor mixes, and routing snapshots tightly aligned with RME driver architecture. It is strongest for complex headphone and speaker monitoring setups that need multiple simultaneous mixes and repeatable signal paths.
Pros
- Highly granular routing matrix across inputs, outputs, and internal busses
- Multiple monitor mixes with fast per-output level control
- Reliable DSP monitoring workflow tightly integrated with RME drivers
Cons
- Routing grid learning curve for large I O configurations
- Interface density can slow setup for simple stereo monitoring
- Less suited for non-RME devices and mixed driver environments
Best For
RME-based studios needing advanced monitor routing and repeatable internal mixes
PreSonus Studio One
DAW routingStudio One includes channel routing, bus and I/O management for flexible signal paths between virtual instruments, tracks, and audio interfaces.
Studio One Console with monitor send and cue routing for live recording and overdubs
PreSonus Studio One stands out with tight, DAW-level integration of routing using its Console and flexible track and bus architecture. Audio routing tasks are handled with routable inputs and outputs, internal buses, and configurable monitoring paths for recording, mixing, and playback. The same environment supports external hardware routing through device I/O management while keeping automation and track control aligned with the signal path.
Pros
- Console view makes complex routing chains easy to visualize and verify
- Track, bus, and monitor routing supports both recording and cue workflows
- Internal buses keep effects and control routing consistent across sessions
Cons
- Routing to external devices is powerful but can feel layered for beginners
- Deep matrix-style routing requires careful setup versus dedicated router tools
- Complex cue mixes can become harder to troubleshoot without disciplined naming
Best For
Studio engineers routing audio between software, interfaces, and cues in one DAW
More related reading
Steinberg Nuendo
DAW routingNuendo supports multi-route audio workflows with buses, sends, and I/O channel configuration for complex production routing.
Surround monitoring and routing within Nuendo’s integrated mixer and cue workflow
Nuendo pairs a pro audio workstation with deep routing and monitoring features for complex production setups. The software provides flexible audio routing across tracks and buses, plus surround-oriented monitoring options that support session-scale signal flow. Nuendo’s built-in mixer and cueing workflows make it practical for mapping external inputs and monitoring multiple destinations during recording and post. It is strongest when advanced routing needs align with Nuendo’s broader production features like multi-format editing and extensive I O management.
Pros
- Extensive routing with buses and monitoring paths for multi-destination workflows
- Surround and cue monitoring tools support complex signal layouts
- Tightly integrated mixer workflow reduces patching friction inside sessions
Cons
- Routing setup can feel complex for simple studio signal chains
- Advanced monitoring and multi-format workflows increase configuration overhead
- Requires careful session organization to avoid signal path confusion
Best For
Media production teams needing advanced routing and surround monitoring in one workstation
Steinberg Cubase
DAW routingCubase provides extensive audio channel and bus routing with customizable mixer paths for multi-track production signal flow.
Control Room for monitoring and headphone routing with per-output signal paths
Cubase stands out with deep integration between routing and a full DAW environment, including flexible track-based signal flow. It provides comprehensive audio input and output routing with extensive bus, group, and effects chain capabilities. Its audio track layout, control room workflow, and robust plugin signal paths make it strong for complex multi-output sessions. Real-world routing depth can feel high for users who only need simple device-to-output switching.
Pros
- Control Room enables sophisticated monitoring routing and quick input output swaps
- Extensive buses and group tracks support multi-stage audio routing and mixing
- Sample-accurate automation and plugin chains stay intact through routed paths
Cons
- Routing setup can be complex for straightforward I O switching workflows
- More advanced monitoring configurations require careful configuration discipline
- Learning curve rises when combining external inputs with complex internal busing
Best For
Studios routing many inputs and outputs within a full DAW workflow
Soundscape by Audiokinetic
spatial audioSoundscape enables spatial audio routing and mixing for interactive audio by controlling signal paths from emitters to output.
Real-time interactive audio routing with event-driven control of playback behavior
Soundscape by Audiokinetic stands out with its real-time interactive audio pipeline that translates gameplay events into routed sound behaviors. It provides node-based audio routing and integration with audio assets managed in Audiokinetic toolchains for spatial, priority, and effect-aware playback. The system supports authoring of interactive triggers and mixing behaviors, with routing choices tied to in-engine logic. This makes it well suited to complex scene audio coordination where routing must respond to gameplay state.
Pros
- Real-time routing driven by gameplay events and interactive logic
- Strong spatial audio controls for multi-source scene organization
- Integrated workflow with Audiokinetic audio asset and mixing toolchains
Cons
- Setup and debugging can be complex without strong pipeline familiarity
- Routing outcomes depend heavily on correct authoring and event wiring
- Best results require adopting the broader Audiokinetic ecosystem
Best For
Game audio teams needing responsive audio routing with interactive scene control
More related reading
Voicemeeter
virtual mixerVB-Audio Voicemeeter routes multiple audio sources to selectable outputs using virtual mixer strips and device patching.
Virtual Input and multi-bus mixer routing to virtual and physical outputs
Voicemeeter stands out for using virtual audio devices to route microphones, system audio, and external inputs into multiple mix buses. It offers a configurable chain with multiple inputs per device, per-channel EQ and filtering, and routing to physical outputs or virtual devices. Advanced users can leverage multiple insert points and mapping rules to build low-latency monitoring and complex bus workflows. The tool targets real-time audio mixing and routing rather than device management or recording-layer features.
Pros
- Multi-bus virtual mixer routes mic, system audio, and device inputs simultaneously
- Per-channel EQ and filtering enable corrective tuning before output
- Low-latency monitoring supports real-time talkback and stream mixes
- Flexible output routing to both virtual and physical devices
Cons
- GUI complexity and signal-flow conventions require time to learn
- Visual meters do not substitute for clear routing diagrams in setup
- Inconsistent terminology across tabs slows troubleshooting for new users
- Advanced routing can be fragile when Windows audio devices change
Best For
Creators needing granular routing and mixing between apps and virtual outputs
Soundflower
virtual audioSoundflower creates virtual audio devices on macOS and allows applications to route audio between apps for recording and mixing.
Virtual audio device driver for capturing and routing system audio between apps
Soundflower is a macOS audio routing tool built around a virtual audio device that exposes system audio to apps and processors. It enables per-application monitoring and routing by creating inputs and outputs that other audio software can select. It also supports chaining with effect plug-ins and DAWs through standard audio device selection. Its distinct approach relies on driver-level virtual devices instead of a graph-based patcher UI.
Pros
- Creates virtual audio devices that apps can select like real hardware
- Enables loopback routing for recording system audio with standard DAWs
- Works with common audio workflows that expect audio device inputs and outputs
Cons
- Setup requires careful device selection and routing configuration
- Graphical routing control is limited compared with node-based alternatives
- Compatibility can be sensitive to macOS audio permission and driver behavior
Best For
Mac users routing system audio into DAWs, stream tools, and effects
More related reading
Audio Hijack
routing automationAudio Hijack captures and routes audio streams with channel-by-channel rules and virtual outputs for downstream processing.
Audio Hijack Blocks graph routes with effects and recordings tied directly to each route
Audio Hijack is distinctive for its node-based audio routing and processing in a single macOS app. It combines virtual audio cables with graph-style chains that can tap, transform, and route system audio, microphone input, and app audio. Core capabilities include recording from routes, per-route effects, flexible session control, and robust routing to speakers, external devices, or virtual outputs.
Pros
- Node-based routing and processing chains for precise audio workflow control.
- Captures and routes audio from specific apps, system output, and microphone inputs.
- Built-in effects and recording from routes for streaming and podcast production.
Cons
- Graph setup can feel complex for simple one-path routing tasks.
- Storing and reusing complex chains requires careful naming and organization.
- macOS-only operation limits use with cross-platform audio routing needs.
Best For
Audio routing power users on macOS building reusable recording and processing workflows
Loopback
virtual audioRogue Amoeba Loopback routes macOS audio by connecting apps and devices to virtual channels with flexible mix and resampling.
Virtual audio devices that bridge app audio into controllable inputs and outputs
Loopback stands out for its macOS-centric audio routing and virtualization, turning physical inputs and apps into controllable virtual audio devices. It enables per-application and per-device routing with mixing, filtering, and multi-output setups that stay consistent across apps. The tool also supports hot-pluggable virtual devices for common workflows like conferencing, streaming, and app-to-app audio bridging. Loopback’s strength is practical audio system orchestration with a visual, device-based approach rather than code-based patching.
Pros
- Creates virtual audio devices that other apps can select and route reliably
- Provides a clear, visual routing graph for managing inputs, outputs, and mixes
- Supports multi-destination routing for monitoring and simultaneous recording
Cons
- Routing complexity can become harder to manage in large multi-route projects
- macOS-only focus limits options for cross-platform audio workflows
- Some advanced studio routing and plugin chains require extra setup
Best For
Mac audio workflows needing virtual devices for routing, monitoring, and conferencing
How to Choose the Right Audio Routing Software
This buyer's guide explains how to choose audio routing software for studio monitoring, DAW cueing, spatial game audio, and macOS app-to-app bridging. Coverage includes Merging Technologies Pyramix, RME TotalMix FX, PreSonus Studio One, Steinberg Nuendo, Steinberg Cubase, Soundscape by Audiokinetic, Voicemeeter, Soundflower, Audio Hijack, and Loopback. It maps practical selection criteria to the routing behaviors and workflow strengths of each tool.
What Is Audio Routing Software?
Audio routing software connects audio sources to destinations using selectable buses, virtual devices, or graph-style pipelines. It solves problems like sending inputs to multiple monitor mixes, creating cue paths for live recording, and routing app audio into DAWs for capture and processing. In practice, studio-first routing tools like Merging Technologies Pyramix focus on deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring. macOS bridging tools like Loopback and Soundflower create virtual audio devices so other apps can select routed inputs and outputs.
Key Features to Look For
The right feature set determines whether routing stays predictable during recording and playback or becomes difficult to trace when projects grow.
Deterministic multichannel routing and modular signal flow
Merging Technologies Pyramix emphasizes a modular routing matrix designed for deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring. This fits studio workflows that require consistent routing and repeatable latency-consistent behavior across complex I/O layouts.
Hardware-integrated routing matrix with per-output monitor mixes
RME TotalMix FX delivers a highly granular routing matrix across inputs, outputs, and internal busses with independent per-output monitor mixes. This keeps monitor mixes and DSP monitoring workflows tightly aligned with RME driver behavior for repeatable cue and headphone routing.
DAW-level console routing with cue and monitor send workflows
PreSonus Studio One uses its Console to route monitor sends and cue paths for live recording and overdubs. Steinberg Cubase uses Control Room to manage sophisticated monitoring routing with per-output signal paths.
Integrated surround monitoring and routed mixer workflows
Steinberg Nuendo combines flexible audio routing with surround monitoring and cueing tools inside the integrated mixer workflow. This supports session-scale signal flow when audio needs to be delivered to multiple monitoring destinations beyond stereo.
Real-time event-driven routing for interactive audio pipelines
Soundscape by Audiokinetic routes and mixes spatial audio based on gameplay events and interactive logic. This keeps routing choices tied to scene state so emitters and priority behavior can change in real time.
Virtual audio devices and graph-based chains for macOS app bridging
Loopback and Soundflower create virtual audio devices so macOS apps can select routed inputs and outputs like real hardware. Audio Hijack uses node-based routing and Audio Hijack Blocks to tie effects and recordings directly to graph routes.
How to Choose the Right Audio Routing Software
Selection should start with the routing problem to solve first, then match the tool’s routing model to that workflow.
Match the routing model to the way monitoring and cueing must work
Studios needing deterministic multichannel signal flow should evaluate Merging Technologies Pyramix because its modular routing matrix is built for consistent monitoring and signal paths. RME-based studios needing repeatable headphone and speaker mixes should evaluate RME TotalMix FX because its routing matrix includes independent per-output monitor mixes.
Choose a DAW-integrated console approach for session-based workflows
Teams routing software tracks, internal buses, and cue sends inside one workstation should use PreSonus Studio One because its Console view makes complex routing chains easier to visualize and verify. Media production workflows that require surround monitoring and cue routing should use Steinberg Nuendo because its integrated mixer and cue workflow includes surround-oriented monitoring.
Pick Control Room when monitoring needs per-output control inside the DAW
Studios routing many inputs and outputs while monitoring headphones and speakers should use Steinberg Cubase because Control Room enables quick input output swaps and per-output monitoring paths. This approach keeps plugin signal paths aligned with routed channels for multi-output sessions.
Use interactive routing tools when routing must respond to logic
Game audio teams needing routing that changes based on gameplay state should evaluate Soundscape by Audiokinetic because its real-time interactive pipeline ties routing outcomes to in-engine logic. It supports spatial controls and mixing behavior driven by interactive triggers.
Select virtual devices or node-based chains for app-to-app and recording pipelines on macOS
Creators who need to route system audio and microphone inputs into multiple outputs should evaluate Voicemeeter because it routes sources through a virtual multi-bus mixer with per-channel EQ and flexible output routing. macOS users who need applications to select routed audio devices should evaluate Loopback or Soundflower because they create virtual audio devices, while Audio Hijack should be selected when node-based graph routes must include recording and effects attached to each route.
Who Needs Audio Routing Software?
Audio routing software fits teams that must control monitoring, cueing, or app-to-app audio capture with repeatable paths.
Studios requiring deterministic multichannel routing and tight monitoring control
Merging Technologies Pyramix fits this need because it provides a modular routing matrix intended for deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring. This setup targets studio workflows where latency-consistent behavior and configurable routing tasks matter during recording and playback.
RME-based studios building repeatable internal monitor and headphone mixes
RME TotalMix FX fits this need because it offers a highly granular routing matrix with independent per-output monitor mixes. It also integrates monitoring workflows directly with RME driver architecture for stable DSP monitoring behavior.
Studio engineers routing between software, interfaces, and cues inside one DAW
PreSonus Studio One fits this need because its Console supports monitor send and cue routing for recording and overdubs. It also keeps internal buses and external hardware routing aligned with the signal path.
Media production teams needing surround monitoring and complex session routing
Steinberg Nuendo fits this need because it combines flexible routing with surround monitoring and cue workflows inside the integrated mixer. This is designed for session-scale signal flow across multiple destinations.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Routing failures often come from mismatching the tool to the routing scope or from underestimating how routing complexity affects setup and troubleshooting.
Overbuilding with deep matrix routing for simple stereo switching
Routing grids and deep matrix configurations can add overhead when the task is only simple device-to-output switching. RME TotalMix FX may slow setup for simple stereo monitoring due to interface density, and Merging Technologies Pyramix setup time increases with advanced routing depth.
Letting monitoring and cue paths become hard to troubleshoot
Complex cue mixes become harder to troubleshoot without disciplined naming in PreSonus Studio One, and signal path confusion can increase in Nuendo when session organization is weak. Steinberg Cubase also requires careful configuration discipline when advanced monitoring configurations are used.
Choosing a macOS-only routing approach for cross-platform studio workflows
Soundflower, Audio Hijack, and Loopback target macOS routing and virtual audio devices, which limits cross-platform audio routing flexibility. Voicemeeter also depends on Windows audio device behavior, so routing can become fragile when Windows audio devices change.
Expecting interactive routing results without correct event wiring
Soundscape by Audiokinetic routing outcomes depend on correct authoring and event wiring, so miswired events can produce routing that looks correct in isolation but fails in the interactive pipeline. This can also increase setup and debugging complexity for teams that do not already use the Audiokinetic toolchain.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions with features weighted at 0.4, ease of use weighted at 0.3, and value weighted at 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Merging Technologies Pyramix separated from lower-ranked tools because its modular routing matrix delivered deterministic multichannel signal flow and monitoring as a core feature strength. That feature strength carried through because it directly supports advanced studio routing workflows where predictable signal paths matter more than basic device switching.
Frequently Asked Questions About Audio Routing Software
Which audio routing tool is best for deterministic multichannel studio workflows?
Merging Technologies Pyramix fits studios that need deterministic multichannel routing with consistent latency handling across recording, mixing, and playback. Its routing, monitoring, and signal processing workflow is built around a studio control surface model rather than simple device switching.
Which tool offers the most control for complex headphone and speaker monitor mixes?
RME TotalMix FX fits RME-based setups that require multiple simultaneous monitor mixes with repeatable signal paths. Its TotalMix FX routing matrix provides independent per-output monitor mixes plus per-channel DSP.
What should a DAW-centric engineer use for routing between software tracks, cue paths, and external hardware?
PreSonus Studio One fits engineers who want routing handled inside the DAW via its Console, routable inputs and outputs, and internal buses. Its device I/O management keeps automation and track control aligned with the actual signal path.
Which workstation is strongest for surround-oriented routing and monitoring during production and post?
Steinberg Nuendo fits media production teams that need session-scale signal flow with surround monitoring options. Its integrated mixer and cue workflows support mapping external inputs and monitoring multiple destinations during recording and post.
What routing software is best when the session already includes many outputs, groups, and effects chains?
Steinberg Cubase fits studios routing many inputs and outputs within a full DAW workflow. Its Control Room and track-based signal flow handle complex multi-output sessions, though the depth can feel high for users who only need basic device-to-output switching.
Which tool is designed for event-driven audio routing in interactive applications and games?
Soundscape by Audiokinetic fits game audio teams that need routing behavior tied to gameplay state. Its node-based interactive audio pipeline maps gameplay events to routed sound behaviors with spatial priority and effect-aware playback.
Which tool targets creators who need to route multiple app audio streams into virtual buses with processing?
Voicemeeter fits creators who need granular routing between microphones, system audio, and multiple virtual mix buses. It also supports configurable chains with EQ and filtering per channel and routes to physical outputs or other virtual devices.
What’s the best option on macOS for exposing system audio to other apps as a virtual input?
Soundflower fits macOS users who need system audio to appear as a selectable virtual audio device for other apps. It enables per-application monitoring and routing by creating virtual inputs and outputs that downstream DAWs and tools can select.
Which macOS app is better for building reusable node-based capture and processing routes with recordings per route?
Audio Hijack fits users who want node-based routing plus processing in one app using graph-style chains. Each route can be tapped, transformed, and routed while supporting recording from routes and sending audio to speakers, external devices, or virtual outputs.
Which macOS routing tool is best for turning specific apps and devices into controllable virtual devices for conferencing and streaming?
Loopback fits Mac audio workflows that require per-application and per-device routing into controllable virtual audio devices. Its visual, device-based approach supports multi-output setups and hot-pluggable virtual devices for common bridging tasks like conferencing and streaming.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music and audio, Merging Technologies Pyramix stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.
