GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Employment WorkforceTop 10 Best Agency Timesheet Software of 2026
Top 10 Agency Timesheet Software picks for agencies, with a technical comparison of Replicon, Toggl Track, Kissflow Timesheet, and others.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Related reading
Comparison Table
The comparison table maps Agency Timesheet software across integration depth, data model, and the automation and API surface used for time capture and sync. It also breaks out admin and governance controls, including RBAC, configuration options, provisioning, and audit log coverage, so agencies can assess fit for multi-team deployments. Replicon, Toggl Track, and Kissflow Timesheet are used as anchor examples to show how each schema and automation approach affects workflow throughput.
Toggl Track
time trackingWeb and desktop time tracking with timesheets, team reporting, and project-based cost tracking for agency teams that bill by time.
Idle detection and smart reminders to surface forgotten or stalled timers
Toggl Track is a timesheet solution built around quick capture, using one-click timers and fast manual entry so agency staff can record work during client calls, revisions, and handoffs without switching tools. It organizes tracked time by client and project, which supports reporting that reflects how agency work is structured for internal review and client status reporting.
Team reporting turns tracked activity into summaries that agencies can use to understand allocation across projects and staff, including views that help identify untracked gaps and out-of-hours work. A practical tradeoff is that it depends on consistent project and client assignment at capture time, so agencies with frequent ad hoc work naming need clear conventions to keep reports clean.
It fits agency teams that want lightweight time logging without heavy workflow overhead, such as creative, marketing, and technical services where deliverables change often. It also works well for maintaining a credible activity trail for review meetings when the agency needs evidence of effort rather than only end-of-month totals.
- +Quick start timers and keyboard shortcuts speed up daily time logging
- +Client and project structure supports agency-style tracking and reporting
- +Detailed reports break down time by person, project, and time range
- +Automatic idle detection flags likely forgotten times
- –Advanced approval and billing workflows require careful configuration
- –Time tracking data export can feel cumbersome for complex agency processes
Account managers coordinating multi-client deliverables
Capture time for client meetings, feedback rounds, and production coordination across several active projects in the same day
More consistent activity records per client and faster internal reporting for weekly check-ins.
Creative teams running iterative design and revision cycles
Track time by project during rapid revisions where tasks change after each review
Project-level time visibility that aligns with iteration-heavy workflows.
Show 2 more scenarios
Agency leadership reviewing resource allocation
Audit where team time was spent across projects and staff to inform staffing decisions for upcoming sprints
Better planning inputs based on actual logged effort patterns.
Leadership can use team reporting to compare logged time by project and person and spot patterns such as recurring under-tracking or over-allocation. Clear labeling of client and project during capture improves the usefulness of these allocation views.
Developers and technical producers supporting delivery work and support requests
Separate time across client projects and ongoing support tasks without adopting a heavyweight process
More traceable effort breakdown across delivery and support workstreams.
Technical producers can start timers for development work and separate entries by client and project, while developers can record updates immediately after implementation. Team summaries help correlate tracked work with delivery milestones and ongoing tasks.
Best for: Agencies needing rapid time capture and dependable project reporting
More related reading
Kissflow Timesheet
workflow timesheetsTimesheet workflow automation that captures time entries, supports approvals, and ties submissions to organizational processes for agency staffing.
Timesheet approval workflow automation with configurable submission and edit controls
Kissflow Timesheet stands out for combining timesheet capture with approval workflow automation inside a centralized work management experience. It supports manager approvals, policy controls around submissions, and structured time entry for projects and teams.
Stronger configurations enable visibility into workload and status by linking time tracking to operational process steps. It is less strong for extremely lightweight, offline-first timesheet capture needs where simplicity outweighs workflow depth.
- +Workflow-driven approvals reduce timesheet back-and-forth with managers
- +Project and team-based time entry keeps reporting aligned to delivery work
- +Policy controls help enforce submission and edit rules
- –Setup for detailed processes requires more configuration than simple timesheet tools
- –Dense configuration can slow adoption for teams needing minimal features
- –Reporting granularity depends on how work objects and workflows are modeled
Project-based agencies managing shared resourcing across multiple clients
Agencies collect employee time against client projects and route submissions for manager approval with built-in policy checks.
Reduced cycle time from time entry to approved billing inputs and fewer manual spreadsheet adjustments.
Operations leaders running workload governance for delivery teams
Operations teams link timesheet status to process steps so managers can monitor progress and intervene when entries stall or violate policy.
Improved forecasting accuracy through faster access to complete and approved time data.
Show 1 more scenario
Finance and compliance teams that require controlled time capture and auditability
Finance teams enforce standardized time entry behavior, approval routing, and exceptions handling for periods, projects, and roles.
Lower audit effort from more consistent approval trails and fewer post-approval edits.
Workflow automation supports controlled submissions and review outcomes so finance can rely on consistent records rather than ad hoc corrections.
Best for: Agencies needing workflow approvals and structured timesheet governance
Clockify
budget-friendlyTeam time tracking with timesheets, timesheet approvals, and project and client reporting for agencies managing billable work.
Cross-platform time tracking with browser extension, desktop app, and manual entry
Clockify fits agency teams that need consistent time capture across multiple clients, projects, and staff locations without switching tools. It combines web and desktop timers with manual entry so work can be logged during active tasks or after the fact when context is available. Its reporting and export-oriented summaries support client-facing reconciliation workflows where the same time categories must be repeatable month to month.
A tradeoff for agencies is that teams still need to maintain correct project and client setup so dashboards and exports group time the way finance expects. This is most noticeable when new client projects are spun up frequently or when staff start logging before project structures are finalized. It also works best when agencies use role-based workflow discipline for review and corrections rather than relying on ad hoc cleanup after reporting is generated.
- +Instant timer with browser and desktop tracking for quick agency timesheets
- +Flexible client and project structure supports multi-client, multi-workstream tracking
- +Reports provide dashboards and exportable summaries for billing and profitability views
- –Advanced role controls and governance options feel limited for complex agencies
- –Timesheet review workflows lack dedicated approvals and audit trails
Timesheet managers coordinating multi-client work across several staff members
Centralized weekly timesheet review using team activity views and export-ready reports for each client
Faster staff corrections and cleaner client-ready totals with fewer manual re-mapping steps.
Project leads managing ongoing work with frequent task switching
Mixed timer and manual logging for campaigns that require logging during work and updating after meetings
More complete project histories that support accurate internal status reporting and billing alignment.
Show 2 more scenarios
Agency administrators handling standardization across departments
Create consistent client and project structures so reporting dashboards produce comparable outputs across teams
Reduced variance in reporting outputs and fewer errors caused by inconsistent categorization.
Administrators can enforce a shared organization model for projects and clients so team dashboards and exported summaries follow the same structure over time.
Finance and billing operations teams reconciling timesheets for client invoicing
Generate repeatable summaries with exports that match invoicing categories
Lower reconciliation effort due to time exports that align with invoice-ready categories.
Finance teams can use Clockify reporting views to produce structured time summaries and export them for downstream invoice workflows that require consistent grouping.
Best for: Agencies needing lightweight time tracking and reporting for client work
More related reading
Harvest
agency billing-readyTimesheets and time tracking with client and project organization, invoicing exports, and reporting for agencies that need billable hours visibility.
Automatic time tracking that infers activity and populates timesheets
Harvest stands out with automatic time tracking from desktop and mobile activity, reducing manual timesheet entry. It supports project-based tracking with client and task structures, plus timesheet approvals for agency workflows. The tool also includes reporting for utilization and billing views, and it connects to common work tools to streamline context.
- +Automatic time capture cuts timesheet entry overhead significantly
- +Project, client, and task tracking maps well to agency work structures
- +Approval workflows support controlled timesheet sign-off per role
- –Setup of tracking rules and team conventions can take time
- –Reporting is strong for time metrics but limited for complex agency profitability views
- –Some advanced workflow needs require external process support
Best for: Agencies needing low-friction time capture and project-level approval workflows
Time Doctor
productivity trackingTime tracking with timesheets, productivity monitoring, and detailed reporting aimed at agencies overseeing distributed teams.
Automatic time tracking with app and website monitoring plus idle detection
Time Doctor stands out with automated time tracking that captures activity and app or website usage alongside manual timesheets. Agency teams can manage projects and tasks, review detailed reports per user and client, and set productivity-focused rules like screenshots and idle detection. The solution supports approval workflows for timesheets and helps managers spot unproductive patterns through built-in analytics and exportable history.
- +Automated tracking with app and website activity reduces manual entry
- +Project and client reporting shows time allocation by team member
- +Timesheet approvals support controlled, agency-ready workflows
- –Productivity monitoring options like screenshots can face adoption resistance
- –Setup of tracking and rules can take time across mixed workflows
- –Reporting is strong but can feel rigid for highly customized agency processes
Best for: Agencies needing automated timesheets and activity-level reporting across client projects
Workyard
field workforceField-service workforce time tracking with timesheets, shift management, and scheduling features for agencies running on-site crews.
GPS location verification for time entries tied to scheduled jobs
Workyard stands out for visually driven time tracking built around job scheduling and field activity, which helps teams log work against real assignments. Core capabilities include employee time capture, timesheet approvals, GPS-based location checks, and project and job management that ties hours to specific work.
Reporting supports utilization and profitability views by aggregating logged time across clients and projects. The workflow is geared toward service and field teams that need fast capture and clear accountability.
- +Job and schedule-linked timesheets reduce misattributed hours
- +GPS-based location checks strengthen timecard integrity
- +Approval workflows support oversight for project-based labor
- –Setup of jobs, roles, and workflows can be time-consuming
- –Reporting depth may require analyst-style cleanup of time data
- –Bulk corrections and edge-case adjustments are not as seamless
Best for: Service agencies tracking field labor against scheduled jobs
More related reading
ClickUp
all-in-one work managementProject management with built-in time tracking and task-level timesheets that agencies use to plan work and record time against projects.
Task time tracking with multiple reporting dashboards for work captured by assignee and project
ClickUp stands out by combining project management with built-in time tracking and reporting inside one workspace. Agencies can log time directly on tasks, set up recurring work items, and generate views for capacity and billing-ready summaries. Its automations, dashboards, and custom fields support agency workflows like intake to delivery and multi-project reporting.
- +Task-level time tracking links effort to specific deliverables
- +Dashboards and reports support cross-project staffing and utilization views
- +Automations reduce manual updates when work status or assignees change
- +Custom fields and statuses fit agency workflows from intake to delivery
- –Reporting for strict billing requirements can require careful setup
- –Workspace customization can add complexity for teams managing many projects
- –Timesheet-style approvals need stronger role and audit controls
- –Deep configuration of views and formulas can slow early adoption
Best for: Agencies needing unified project management and time tracking with flexible reporting
Zoho Projects
project plus timesheetsProject management suite with time tracking and timesheets tied to tasks and projects for agency delivery and reporting.
Timesheets linked directly to tasks and milestones in project workspace
Zoho Projects distinguishes itself with tight project-to-timesheet linkage inside the Zoho suite, enabling agencies to manage work and capture time against tasks and milestones. Users get configurable project workflows with tasks, subtasks, milestones, and status views that pair directly with time entries.
Reporting covers project, task, and team time summaries, supporting utilization and delivery tracking for multi-client engagements. Role-based permissions help separate client visibility while keeping collaboration centralized.
- +Task-based time tracking tied to projects and milestones
- +Built-in reports for time by project, task, and user
- +Role-based permissions for client and team visibility control
- –Timesheet workflows can feel rigid for complex agency approvals
- –Advanced utilization metrics require more manual report setup
- –UI navigation becomes slower with many active projects
Best for: Agencies needing structured task time capture and basic utilization reporting
More related reading
Paymo
time and invoicingTime tracking with timesheets, invoicing, and project cost tracking built for agencies managing billable client work.
Timesheet approvals with role-based access across clients and project work
Paymo stands out for combining timesheets with project billing workflows and built-in reporting in one workspace. It supports time tracking, task assignment, approvals, and timesheet management designed for client-facing delivery teams.
Resource views and productivity reporting help agencies monitor utilization and status across projects. The system also includes invoicing-oriented exports and role-based controls for multiple stakeholders.
- +Integrated timesheets, tasks, and project tracking for agency delivery
- +Timesheet approvals and roles support client and internal review workflows
- +Reporting links time to projects for clearer progress and productivity tracking
- –Setup and custom fields can feel heavy for small teams
- –Workflow depth can require training to use consistently across projects
- –Some agency-specific billing edge cases depend on careful configuration
Best for: Agencies needing structured timesheet approvals and project-linked reporting
BigTime
agency PSATimesheets and resource time tracking with project cost controls, billing-grade time capture, and analytics for agencies.
Time change audit trail tied to role permissions and workflow status transitions.
BigTime fits agencies that need time capture tied to projects, clients, and resources with governance controls for distributed teams. Its integration story centers on a defined data model for timesheets and work assignments, plus API-based automation for pulling and pushing operational data.
Admin controls support role-based access and oversight workflows, including audit-oriented activity tracking around time changes. Extensibility and throughput depend on how consistently the API maps to the same schema used by the UI and provisioning flows.
- +API-backed timesheet and project data model for consistent automation
- +Role-based access supports separated agency operations and editing rights
- +Audit-focused change history aids governance and time dispute handling
- +Configuration supports process alignment across multiple client engagements
- –Integration depth varies by work lifecycle fields and status transitions
- –Automation depends on API coverage for every required custom workflow field
- –Admin governance features may require deliberate setup to avoid permission drift
Best for: Fits when agencies need API-driven time capture with RBAC, audit visibility, and controlled edits.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 employment workforce, Toggl Track stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Agency Timesheet Software
This buyer’s guide covers agency timesheet software selection across Toggl Track, Kissflow Timesheet, Clockify, Harvest, Time Doctor, Workyard, ClickUp, Zoho Projects, Paymo, and BigTime.
The guidance focuses on integration depth, the underlying data model, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls for review-ready timesheet operations.
Agency timesheet workflow systems that map time entries to client work and approvals
Agency timesheet software records effort by client, project, task, or job and then turns those time entries into reports that agencies use for staffing visibility and client reconciliation. These tools also manage edits and sign-off through approvals so timesheets become an auditable record rather than a spreadsheet-only workflow.
Toggl Track is an example focused on rapid capture with project and client structure. Kissflow Timesheet is an example that pairs time capture with workflow-driven approvals tied to configurable submission and edit controls.
Evaluation criteria for integration, automation, and governed timesheet data
Agencies fail when the system’s data model does not match how work is named during capture. They also fail when automation cannot enforce consistent project, client, and status mapping across every change.
The strongest options expose an automation surface that aligns with their schema and then add admin controls like RBAC and audit history to prevent permission drift and disputed edits.
Schema alignment for client, project, task, and workflow objects
The data model must support how agencies structure work so time capture can be attributed correctly at entry time. Toggl Track organizes captured time by client and project for reporting that matches agency work structure, while Zoho Projects links timesheets directly to tasks and milestones inside the Zoho workspace.
API-backed automation that maps to the same timesheet schema
API coverage determines whether automation can push and pull the same fields that the UI uses for approvals and reporting. BigTime centers integration on an API-driven data model for timesheets and work assignments, and it flags governance gaps when API coverage does not cover every custom workflow field.
Approval workflow automation with configurable submission and edit controls
Approval mechanics need to enforce when entries can be edited and who can approve. Kissflow Timesheet emphasizes approval workflow automation with configurable submission and edit controls, while Paymo pairs timesheet approvals with role-based access across clients and project work.
Admin governance controls with role permissions and audit visibility
Governance requires RBAC that restricts edits by role and an audit log that records time changes for disputes. BigTime’s audit-focused change history is tied to role permissions and workflow status transitions, while Clockify highlights limited audit trails and governance controls for complex agencies.
Automated time capture signals that reduce missed or stalled entries
Automation that detects idle time or activity helps agencies reduce blank timesheets and forgotten timers. Toggl Track uses idle detection and smart reminders for stalled timers, while Harvest and Time Doctor infer activity and populate timesheets using automatic capture plus idle detection.
Extensibility through consistent configuration of workflow fields and reporting exports
Extensibility depends on whether custom workflows stay consistent across exports and reporting. Toggl Track’s export experience can feel cumbersome for complex agency processes, while Workyard ties timesheets to scheduled jobs and uses GPS location verification to strengthen timecard integrity for field labor reporting.
A decision framework for governed, automation-ready agency timesheet operations
Start with the agency’s capture reality. Determine whether time is logged during calls, revisions, and handoffs with frequent ad hoc naming, or whether capture happens against prebuilt work objects like tasks, milestones, or scheduled jobs.
Next, test whether automation can enforce the same mapping rules the UI expects. Then confirm governance by verifying RBAC and audit visibility for time edits and approval transitions.
Match the data model to real capture events
If capture must be fast during ongoing client work with frequent project naming variation, Toggl Track’s project and client structure supports agency-style tracking with quick one-click timers. If capture must be tied to defined work objects like tasks and milestones, Zoho Projects links timesheets directly to those tasks and milestones.
Select the automation surface and confirm the API mapping
When integration requires automated provisioning and downstream synchronization of time and assignments, BigTime is the closest fit because its integration story centers on an API-backed timesheet and project data model. If integration needs are lighter and the main goal is quick capture plus recurring reporting, Clockify provides browser extension and desktop timer options with exportable summaries.
Require approval logic that covers submission and edits, not just approvals
When managers must approve submissions and enforce edit controls, Kissflow Timesheet provides workflow automation with configurable submission and edit rules. When approvals must also enforce role separation across client and project stakeholders, Paymo couples timesheet approvals with role-based access.
Validate admin governance and audit trail coverage for disputes
For distributed agencies that need traceability of every time change, BigTime’s audit trail ties changes to role permissions and workflow status transitions. Clockify’s governance and audit trails are described as limited for complex agencies, so it is a weaker choice when dispute handling requires detailed audit visibility.
Choose capture automation based on the risk pattern of missed time
If the risk is forgotten or stalled timers during busy client calls, Toggl Track’s idle detection and smart reminders are designed for that failure mode. If the risk is manual overhead from inferring activity context, Harvest’s automatic time tracking populates timesheets and Time Doctor adds app and website monitoring with idle detection.
Confirm reporting depth matches billing-grade reconciliation needs
If agencies need multi-client, multi-project dashboards and repeatable summaries for billing reconciliation, Clockify offers reporting and export-oriented summaries. If reporting needs tie tightly to delivery structure, ClickUp uses task-level time tracking with multiple dashboards, while Workyard supports utilization and profitability views aggregated from job- and schedule-linked field logs.
Agency teams and operating models that benefit from specific timesheet capabilities
Agency needs vary by capture timing, work object structure, and governance strength. The best fit depends on whether timesheets function as fast logging, as workflow approvals, or as an auditable record with API-driven automation.
The segments below map those needs to specific tools from the top set.
Agencies that need rapid time capture with dependable client and project reporting
Toggl Track matches this operating model with one-click timers, keyboard shortcuts, and reporting that breaks down time by person, project, and time range. Its idle detection and smart reminders reduce the operational risk of forgotten timers.
Agencies that need structured timesheet governance with approval automation and edit controls
Kissflow Timesheet fits because it runs timesheet approvals as configurable workflow automation tied to submission and edit rules. Paymo also fits for role-based access across clients and project work when multiple stakeholders review timesheets.
Agencies that depend on integrations and governed automation across timesheet fields
BigTime is designed for API-driven time capture tied to a defined data model and RBAC governance. Its audit-focused change history supports time dispute handling when integrations push or pull time and workflow status fields.
Agencies managing field labor against scheduled jobs with accountability
Workyard is built for job and schedule-linked timesheets and adds GPS location checks to strengthen timecard integrity. This matches service agencies where hours must tie to assignments rather than general project labels.
Agencies that want unified project management and task-level time capture
ClickUp fits because it records time on tasks and provides dashboards by assignee and project. Harvest fits for low-friction capture through automatic time tracking that infers activity and populates timesheets with client and project organization.
Common failure modes when adopting agency timesheet software
The most common failures come from mismatched time attribution rules, insufficient workflow enforcement, and governance gaps that surface only during approvals or disputes.
These pitfalls show up repeatedly across the reviewed tools where setup discipline and configuration depth determine how clean reporting stays over time.
Capturing time without stable client and project attribution conventions
Toggl Track and Clockify both rely on consistent client and project setup at capture time, so ad hoc naming breaks reporting grouping. Establish project and client naming rules before rollout so exports and dashboards remain repeatable month to month.
Assuming approvals handle edits, when edit permissions and workflow status transitions must be configured
Kissflow Timesheet only delivers clean governance when submission and edit controls match the workflow, not just when approvals are enabled. BigTime’s audit trail is tied to workflow status transitions and role permissions, so workflow misconfiguration creates audit gaps.
Choosing automatic capture without confirming the audit and governance story for contested entries
Harvest and Time Doctor reduce manual entry through automatic time tracking and app or website monitoring, but contested entries still require clear governance around edits and approvals. For dispute handling, BigTime provides audit-focused change history tied to role permissions.
Overbuilding workflow complexity without matching how teams actually work
Kissflow Timesheet can require more configuration than lightweight timesheet tools, which slows adoption when teams need minimal features. ClickUp’s deep workspace customization and reporting formulas can also slow early adoption when strict billing requirements demand careful setup.
Expecting role controls and audit trails to cover complex agencies without verifying governance depth
Clockify’s advanced role controls and governance options are described as limited for complex agencies, and its timesheet review workflows lack dedicated approvals and audit trails. If the agency requires audit-oriented visibility of time changes, BigTime fits the governance requirement with an audit-oriented activity trail.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Toggl Track, Kissflow Timesheet, Clockify, Harvest, Time Doctor, Workyard, ClickUp, Zoho Projects, Paymo, and BigTime using a criteria-based scoring model that combines features, ease of use, and value, with features carrying the most weight at 40 percent. Ease of use and value each account for the remaining half of the score, so capture speed and operational friction mattered as much as governance fit. Scores reflect only the capabilities and tradeoffs available in the provided product review records, not lab testing or proprietary benchmarks.
Toggl Track set itself apart by scoring high on features and ease of use with idle detection and smart reminders for forgotten or stalled timers, which directly lifted both integration readiness for daily capture and operational control through more reliable time entry behavior.
Frequently Asked Questions About Agency Timesheet Software
Which agency timesheet tools keep project and client reporting accurate when work names change often?
How do Replicon-style approval workflows compare with Kissflow Timesheet for structured submission control?
Which tools support integrations via API so agencies can sync timesheets into billing and work management systems?
What SSO and access controls are typically required for agency teams with multiple clients and shared resources?
How should agencies migrate existing time records into a new system without breaking the project-to-timesheet schema?
Which software handles automated capture without losing context for agency reviews and client status reporting?
What admin controls matter most when agencies need audit logs for time edits and corrections?
Which tools are a better fit for field or job-based agencies that need location or schedule validation?
What configuration approach reduces errors when approvals and edits happen across managers and multiple stakeholders?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Employment Workforce alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of employment workforce tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare employment workforce tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.