GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 9 Best Acoustic Treatment Software of 2026
Compare Acoustic Treatment Software with a ranked top 10 list for studio measurement and room tuning. Review ARTA, Smaart, EASE picks.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ARTA
Room modal and response prediction with treatment placement iteration
Built for studios and engineers planning acoustic treatment around measured room behavior.
Smaart
Real-time coherence-assisted measurement quality during frequency and impulse analysis
Built for acoustic engineers measuring rooms and systems with validation workflows.
EASE
EASE 3D sound-field and reverberation prediction for treatment impact testing
Built for acoustic consultants needing simulation-first treatment planning and validation.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps core capabilities across leading acoustic treatment and room measurement tools, including ARTA, Smaart, EASE, Odeon, and SketchUp, plus other widely used options. It highlights how each software supports measurement, room or acoustics modeling, simulation workflows, and practical use cases for tuning spaces with controllable variables like geometry, absorption, and diffusion.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARTA Provides audio measurement and analysis tools for characterizing room acoustics and identifying issues that treatments can address. | measurement-analysis | 8.4/10 | 8.9/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 |
| 2 | Smaart Delivers transfer function measurement workflows used to assess room and system behavior before and after acoustic treatment changes. | systems-measurement | 8.1/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 3 | EASE Supports acoustics simulation for sound propagation and room behavior modeling used in treatment and geometry studies. | propagation-simulation | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 4 | Odeon Provides predictive acoustics modeling for sound fields in rooms used to evaluate and optimize acoustic treatment layouts. | acoustic-prediction | 7.9/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 5 | SketchUp Acts as a geometry modeling foundation for acoustic treatment design when paired with acoustics analysis workflows. | 3d-modeling | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 6 | Revit Enables architectural modeling that supports acoustics planning workflows for treatment placement in engineered building models. | architectural-modeling | 7.2/10 | 7.2/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 7 | Sonic Visualiser Desktop software for visualizing audio, inspecting waveforms and spectra, and annotating acoustic measurement signals. | measurement visualization | 8.0/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 8 | Room EQ Wizard Interactive desktop tool for measuring room frequency response and generating corrective filter curves. | room response | 7.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 9 | WinMLS Acoustic measurement and analysis software for recording room impulse responses and evaluating reverberation-related metrics. | measurement and analysis | 7.4/10 | 7.5/10 | 6.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
Provides audio measurement and analysis tools for characterizing room acoustics and identifying issues that treatments can address.
Delivers transfer function measurement workflows used to assess room and system behavior before and after acoustic treatment changes.
Supports acoustics simulation for sound propagation and room behavior modeling used in treatment and geometry studies.
Provides predictive acoustics modeling for sound fields in rooms used to evaluate and optimize acoustic treatment layouts.
Acts as a geometry modeling foundation for acoustic treatment design when paired with acoustics analysis workflows.
Enables architectural modeling that supports acoustics planning workflows for treatment placement in engineered building models.
Desktop software for visualizing audio, inspecting waveforms and spectra, and annotating acoustic measurement signals.
Interactive desktop tool for measuring room frequency response and generating corrective filter curves.
Acoustic measurement and analysis software for recording room impulse responses and evaluating reverberation-related metrics.
ARTA
measurement-analysisProvides audio measurement and analysis tools for characterizing room acoustics and identifying issues that treatments can address.
Room modal and response prediction with treatment placement iteration
ARTA from artalabs.hr stands out for acoustic treatment planning focused on measurable room response and speaker or microphone placement. It supports importing room geometry, defining surfaces, and running acoustic calculations to predict how treatment changes modal behavior. The workflow emphasizes iterative adjustments so users can converge on placement and treatment targets without manual hand calculations.
Pros
- Predicts room response changes from treatment using iterative acoustic modeling
- Handles room geometry and surface definitions for realistic placement scenarios
- Lets users test alternate speaker and measurement positions efficiently
Cons
- Model setup can be time-consuming for complex spaces
- Tool results rely on correct geometry and parameter choices
Best For
Studios and engineers planning acoustic treatment around measured room behavior
More related reading
Smaart
systems-measurementDelivers transfer function measurement workflows used to assess room and system behavior before and after acoustic treatment changes.
Real-time coherence-assisted measurement quality during frequency and impulse analysis
Smaart stands out for real-time audio analysis built for validating room and system changes with measurement-grade workflows. Core capabilities include frequency-domain analysis, time-domain alignment tools, and coherence-based verification during capture. The software supports multi-channel measurement and comparison so engineers can track before-and-after acoustic treatment effects. It is used to identify problems like frequency response irregularities and timing issues that broadband treatment alone may not solve.
Pros
- Real-time frequency and time-domain analysis for treatment verification
- Coherence and measurement quality indicators reduce bad takes
- Multi-channel workflows support complex room and system setups
Cons
- Requires measurement literacy and consistent calibration practices
- Interface and workflow can feel dense for non-specialists
- Setup overhead is high for quick, casual acoustic checks
Best For
Acoustic engineers measuring rooms and systems with validation workflows
EASE
propagation-simulationSupports acoustics simulation for sound propagation and room behavior modeling used in treatment and geometry studies.
EASE 3D sound-field and reverberation prediction for treatment impact testing
EASE centers acoustic treatment workflow around room acoustics modeling with actionable results. The software supports the EASE 3D engine for predicting reverberation and sound-field behavior across a room layout. It pairs simulation with visualization tools that help teams validate treatment placements and levels. The workflow is strongest for projects that need consistent, repeatable acoustic design iterations.
Pros
- Accurate room acoustic simulation with sound-field and RT60 oriented outputs
- EASE 3D workflow supports detailed room geometry and material-driven modeling
- Visualization tools make treatment placement and impact easy to verify
Cons
- Model setup and parameter tuning takes expert attention and time
- Library and workflow depth can overwhelm teams without acoustics training
- Iterating large designs requires careful project organization
Best For
Acoustic consultants needing simulation-first treatment planning and validation
More related reading
Odeon
acoustic-predictionProvides predictive acoustics modeling for sound fields in rooms used to evaluate and optimize acoustic treatment layouts.
Odeon’s room acoustic ray-tracing and image-source simulation for treatment scenario prediction
Odeon stands out with room-acoustics simulation built for real acoustic treatment design, not generic audio tooling. It supports acoustic modeling, visualization, and measurement-informed workflows so teams can predict how changes will affect clarity, reverberation, and speech performance. The software targets iterative optimization of absorber, diffuser, and configuration parameters across complex spaces. It emphasizes technical control over results presentation, which can reduce guesswork during treatment planning.
Pros
- High-fidelity room simulation for predicting treatment impact on acoustics
- Detailed control of surfaces and absorber behavior for targeted tuning
- Strong visualization to compare scenarios during iterative design
Cons
- Complex setup and modeling details increase time-to-first useful results
- User workflow favors acoustics specialists over rapid exploratory use
- Requires careful input quality to avoid misleading simulation outcomes
Best For
Acoustic design teams optimizing treatment plans using simulation and iteration
SketchUp
3d-modelingActs as a geometry modeling foundation for acoustic treatment design when paired with acoustics analysis workflows.
Push pull 3D modeling for accurate room shapes and treatment placement
SketchUp stands out for fast 3D modeling of room layouts with a large ecosystem of geometry and visualization tools. It supports acoustic planning through imported CAD, manual surface definition, and exportable views for review and documentation. Acoustic workflows rely on external plugins and render outputs rather than built-in absorption and simulation. That makes it useful for communicating treatment concepts and placements even when it is not a dedicated acoustic solver.
Pros
- Quick room geometry modeling with intuitive push pull workflows
- Strong visualization for communicating treatment placement and coverage
- Large plugin and asset library for adding acoustic or material behaviors
Cons
- Limited native acoustic simulation and no authoritative absorption modeling
- Acoustic results depend on third party plugins and manual setup
- Projects can become heavy when adding detailed meshes and materials
Best For
Studios needing visual room plans and treatment layout communication
More related reading
Revit
architectural-modelingEnables architectural modeling that supports acoustics planning workflows for treatment placement in engineered building models.
Revit Families with parametric geometry for custom acoustic diffusers and absorbers
Revit is distinct because it combines BIM modeling with detailed acoustic-aware workflows inside building design deliverables. Core capabilities include parametric 3D modeling, material assignment on building elements, and coordination tools that support whole-room design changes. For acoustic treatment planning, it enables exportable geometry and documentation to align diffuser, absorber, and layout decisions with architectural drawings. Its acoustic analysis depth is not its primary focus, so it often relies on external analysis or specialized add-ins for accurate room acoustics metrics.
Pros
- Parametric BIM modeling keeps acoustic treatment elements aligned with design changes
- Material and element documentation supports consistent absorber and diffuser specification
- Collaboration and clash workflows reduce rework during acoustic layout revisions
Cons
- Room acoustics predictions require external tools or specialized add-ins
- Steep learning curve for modeling, families, and parameter management
- Geometry-heavy workflows can slow down large projects
Best For
Architectural teams needing coordinated BIM drawings for acoustic treatment layouts
Sonic Visualiser
measurement visualizationDesktop software for visualizing audio, inspecting waveforms and spectra, and annotating acoustic measurement signals.
Layered annotations directly on spectrogram views for precise acoustic documentation
Sonic Visualiser stands out for turning audio into editable time-frequency and analysis views for measuring and documenting sound. Core capabilities include spectrogram visualization, annotation layers, and plugins that support tasks like pitch tracking and audio analysis. It also supports importing common audio formats and exporting both images and annotation data for review workflows. The software is best treated as an analysis and measurement workspace rather than a room correction or speaker tuning controller.
Pros
- Multi-layer annotations tied to time and frequency
- Spectrograms with analysis tooling for detailed acoustic measurements
- Plugin-driven analysis extends beyond basic viewing
Cons
- Workflow setup for acoustic treatment measurements can be time-consuming
- Advanced results depend on correct settings and plugin selection
- No dedicated room modeling or automated treatment recommendations
Best For
Audio analysts documenting acoustic issues through spectrogram evidence
More related reading
Room EQ Wizard
room responseInteractive desktop tool for measuring room frequency response and generating corrective filter curves.
Filter export and detailed measurement views for direct EQ tuning
Room EQ Wizard distinguishes itself with real-time audio measurement and analysis workflows focused on room acoustics. It supports automated sweep-based frequency response, impulse response timing, and extensive EQ filter visualization for tuning playback systems. It also enables measurement overlays and standardized comparisons across multiple mic positions. The tool is geared toward practical calibration rather than architectural modeling, which keeps it tightly focused on tuning and validation.
Pros
- Sweep and frequency response measurements with clear EQ visualization
- Multiple measurement overlays support repeatable before and after comparisons
- Impulse response and time-domain analysis help diagnose timing issues
Cons
- Setup and calibration steps can feel technical for new users
- Results depend heavily on correct mic placement and routing configuration
- Advanced workflows require manual learning of menus and signal routing
Best For
Enthusiasts tuning audio systems with measurement-led acoustic correction
WinMLS
measurement and analysisAcoustic measurement and analysis software for recording room impulse responses and evaluating reverberation-related metrics.
Room parameter and treatment planning workflow with exportable project results
WinMLS stands out by tying acoustic treatment workflow to measurable room parameters and a structured project data model. It supports planning and documentation of acoustic elements by letting users work from room and target requirements toward recommended treatments. The software emphasizes repeatable calculation outputs and exportable project results for handoff to installers and stakeholders. Its value is strongest for studios and professional rooms that need traceable treatment decisions rather than one-off sketches.
Pros
- Structured room and treatment workflow supports repeatable design decisions
- Project outputs provide traceable documentation for client and installer handoff
- Acoustic planning centers on measurable room targets and treatment elements
Cons
- Setup of room parameters can feel slower than faster acoustic calculators
- Results interpretation requires acoustic familiarity to avoid over-treating
Best For
Studios and consultants needing documented, parameter-driven acoustic treatment planning
How to Choose the Right Acoustic Treatment Software
This buyer's guide explains how to choose Acoustic Treatment Software tools for measured room behavior planning, simulation-first design, and validation workflows. It covers ARTA, Smaart, EASE, Odeon, SketchUp, Revit, Sonic Visualiser, Room EQ Wizard, WinMLS, and how each supports a different treatment workflow stage.
What Is Acoustic Treatment Software?
Acoustic Treatment Software is software that helps define acoustic goals, simulate or measure room behavior, and document treatment decisions for absorbers, diffusers, and placement changes. Some tools focus on measurement-grade analysis like Smaart and Room EQ Wizard to verify frequency and time-domain results before and after treatment. Other tools focus on prediction and design iteration like EASE and Odeon using geometry and acoustics modeling to test how treatment choices affect reverberation and sound-field behavior.
Key Features to Look For
These feature checks determine whether the tool supports repeatable design decisions, measurement validation, or documented handoff for treatment projects.
Treatment-aware room response and modal prediction
ARTA supports room modal and response prediction tied to treatment placement iteration so the workflow can converge on speaker and measurement positions. This reduces guesswork when treatment targets depend on how room modes respond to changes.
Coherence-assisted, measurement-grade validation workflows
Smaart provides real-time frequency and time-domain analysis with coherence-based measurement quality indicators. That workflow helps prevent invalid captures that can lead to incorrect conclusions about treatment effectiveness.
Sound-field and reverberation simulation with a 3D engine
EASE centers acoustic treatment workflow around the EASE 3D engine for predicting reverberation and sound-field behavior across a room layout. The visualization and RT60 oriented outputs support consistent simulation-first iteration for consultants and design teams.
High-fidelity ray-tracing and image-source scenario prediction
Odeon uses room acoustic ray-tracing and image-source simulation to predict treatment scenarios across clarity and reverberation outcomes. Detailed surface and absorber behavior controls support targeted tuning rather than generic room estimates.
Fast 3D geometry modeling for placement communication
SketchUp provides push pull 3D modeling to define accurate room shapes and treatment placement coverage. This is valuable for communicating treatment concepts when acoustic solving happens through other tools or plugins.
Structured treatment planning with exportable documentation
WinMLS provides a structured room parameter and treatment planning workflow with exportable project results. This supports traceable decisions for studios and professional rooms that need stakeholder and installer handoff.
How to Choose the Right Acoustic Treatment Software
Choosing the right tool depends on whether the project needs prediction-first design, measurement validation, or documented planning tied to geometry and targets.
Start with the workflow stage: predict, measure, or document
For prediction-first treatment planning, EASE and Odeon focus on simulation outputs and scenario comparison for reverberation and sound-field behavior. For measurement validation after changes, Smaart and Room EQ Wizard emphasize sweep-based frequency response, impulse response timing, and repeatable before-and-after comparisons.
Match the tool to the decision type: modal targets, clarity, or system tuning
For modal and placement iteration tied to measurable room response, choose ARTA because it predicts room response changes from treatment using iterative acoustic modeling. For system tuning and corrective filter visualization tied to room frequency response, choose Room EQ Wizard because it supports filter export and detailed measurement views for direct EQ tuning.
Use the right visualization and annotation workflow for evidence and iteration
For spectrogram evidence and layered measurement documentation, choose Sonic Visualiser because it supports spectrogram visualization, annotation layers, and plugin-driven analysis. For geometry-level treatment verification and repeatable design iterations, choose EASE or Odeon because they visualize sound-field behavior and treatment impacts across room layouts.
Plan for geometry ownership and handoff with BIM or 3D modeling tools
For coordinated architectural delivery, choose Revit because Revit Families support parametric geometry for custom acoustic diffusers and absorbers. For concept-level room layout planning and treatment placement communication, choose SketchUp because push pull workflows and exportable views help communicate coverage and placement even when simulation is external.
Prioritize repeatability and project outputs when multiple stakeholders are involved
For traceable treatment decisions and exportable project documentation, choose WinMLS because it builds a structured room and treatment workflow around measurable targets. For engineering-grade validation where measurement quality must be protected, choose Smaart because coherence-assisted indicators help reduce invalid captures during measurement-driven before-and-after verification.
Who Needs Acoustic Treatment Software?
Acoustic Treatment Software fits teams who need measurable, repeatable room behavior outcomes, whether through simulation, measurement, or documented planning.
Studios and engineers planning acoustic treatment around measured room behavior
ARTA fits this audience because it supports room modal and response prediction with iterative treatment placement modeling. WinMLS also fits because it ties room parameter targets to a structured treatment workflow with exportable project results for studio rooms.
Acoustic engineers validating room and system changes with measurement-grade workflows
Smaart fits this audience because it delivers real-time frequency and time-domain analysis with coherence-based measurement quality indicators. Room EQ Wizard also fits when the focus is sweep measurements and EQ filter visualization for practical calibration and repeatable overlays across mic positions.
Acoustic consultants and design teams who need simulation-first treatment planning and scenario comparison
EASE fits this audience because the EASE 3D engine predicts reverberation and sound-field behavior and supports visualization for treatment placement and level iteration. Odeon fits this audience because ray-tracing and image-source simulation support high-fidelity absorber and diffuser scenario prediction with technical control.
Architectural and coordination teams building treatment elements inside engineered building models
Revit fits this audience because parametric BIM modeling and Revit Families enable custom acoustic diffusers and absorbers tied to building elements. SketchUp fits teams that need fast room geometry modeling and treatment placement visualization to communicate concepts even when acoustic solving relies on external tools or plugins.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Tool choice errors usually come from mixing up measurement validation, simulation prediction, and geometry or documentation needs.
Using simulation tools without correct geometry and parameter discipline
EASE and Odeon both rely on geometry and material-driven modeling inputs to produce actionable acoustic predictions. ARTA also depends on correct geometry and parameter choices because its treatment-aware modal and response predictions require accurate room definitions.
Treating measurement software as a plug-and-play room correction engine
Room EQ Wizard focuses on corrective filter visualization and measurement overlays rather than automated treatment recommendations. Sonic Visualiser is an analysis and annotation workspace that visualizes spectrogram evidence without room modeling or automated treatment planning.
Skipping measurement quality checks during before-and-after validation
Smaart includes coherence-assisted measurement quality indicators to reduce bad captures. Without that discipline, measurement-driven conclusions about treatment effectiveness can be based on invalid frequency and impulse measurements.
Relying on geometry tools that do not own authoritative acoustics modeling
SketchUp provides fast push pull geometry modeling but it does not supply authoritative absorption and simulation as a native acoustic solver. Revit also supports acoustic-aware deliverables through BIM workflows but room acoustics predictions typically require external analysis or specialized add-ins.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions with features weighted at 0.4, ease of use weighted at 0.3, and value weighted at 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average using overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. ARTA separated itself by delivering room modal and response prediction with treatment placement iteration, which strengthened the features score because it directly supports iterative placement decisions instead of only analysis or visualization.
Frequently Asked Questions About Acoustic Treatment Software
Which acoustic treatment software is best for predicting how specific absorber and diffuser placements affect modal behavior?
ARTA is designed for acoustic treatment planning that targets measurable room response and modal behavior through acoustic calculations tied to speaker or microphone placement. Odeon and EASE also support placement-driven optimization, with Odeon using ray-tracing and image-source simulation and EASE using EASE 3D sound-field and reverberation predictions.
What tool is most suitable for validating before-and-after acoustic treatment changes with measurement-grade results?
Smaart supports real-time frequency-domain and time-domain analysis with coherence-based verification during capture. Room EQ Wizard complements validation by automating sweep-based measurements, impulse response timing checks, and EQ filter visualization for comparing multiple mic positions.
Which software workflow targets repeatable simulation iterations across a full room model for consultants?
EASE centers on simulation-first workflows using the EASE 3D engine to predict reverberation and sound-field behavior, then visualizes treatment impact for consistent iterations. Odeon supports iterative optimization across absorber, diffuser, and configuration parameters with detailed acoustic modeling suitable for technical consultant deliverables.
Which platform is better for rooms where accurate technical modeling matters less than communicating treatment layout and geometry?
SketchUp is built for fast 3D modeling and review exports, and acoustic planning often relies on imported CAD, manual surface definition, and external plugins rather than built-in absorption solvers. Revit also supports coordinated design deliverables by tying treatments to building elements, but it typically relies on external analysis or add-ins for accurate acoustic metrics.
What software best supports time-frequency evidence gathering and annotation for diagnosing acoustic issues?
Sonic Visualiser turns audio into editable spectrogram views with annotation layers for documenting acoustic evidence. It also supports plugins such as pitch tracking and can export annotated views and data for review workflows.
Which tool is most aligned with tuning playback systems using measurement overlays and EQ filter visualization?
Room EQ Wizard focuses on practical calibration by showing detailed EQ filter views, enabling measurement overlays, and exporting filter results for direct application. ARTA can also support measurement-led placement and response predictions, but its emphasis is on iterative room-response modeling tied to treatment changes.
Which software is best for teams that need traceable, parameter-driven treatment decisions with exportable project results?
WinMLS emphasizes structured project data, traceable room parameter inputs, and repeatable calculation outputs that can be exported for handoff. ARTA also targets iterative placement convergence, while WinMLS is more focused on documented workflows tied to room and target requirements.
How do simulation-first tools compare with measurement-first tools when the goal is to reduce guesswork in treatment planning?
EASE and Odeon reduce guesswork by simulating treatment scenarios and visualizing predicted reverberation or sound-field outcomes before installation. Smaart and Room EQ Wizard reduce guesswork by verifying changes using measurement capture workflows, then comparing results across multiple mic positions or time alignment checks.
What common setup work causes issues across acoustic treatment software, and how do different tools handle it?
Geometry and coordinate consistency commonly break planning workflows, since ARTA, EASE, and Odeon rely on room layout data for accurate predictions. SketchUp and Revit handle geometry for documentation and coordination, while Smaart and Room EQ Wizard depend on consistent measurement capture and mic positioning for meaningful before-and-after comparisons.
Which tools support integration into broader design or engineering workflows through geometry export or modeling pipelines?
Revit supports parametric BIM modeling with material assignment and coordination tools that export geometry for diffuser, absorber, and layout alignment in architectural deliverables. SketchUp supports CAD import and exportable views for communicating treatment placements, while EASE and Odeon focus on simulation pipelines once the room model is defined.
Conclusion
After evaluating 9 technology digital media, ARTA stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.