GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Construction InfrastructureTop 8 Best Ac Duct Design Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Ac Duct Design Software options for ductwork plans, with picks and rankings to choose the best tool. Explore picks.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
AutoCAD MEP
Duct system routing with editable rules for automated layout and fitting placement
Built for teams producing consistent 2D duct plans with CAD-native control and rules.
Revit MEP
Duct system routing with connectors that automatically propagates size, fittings, and system rules
Built for mEP design teams needing coordinated duct modeling and schedule-driven documentation.
Trimble Connect
Model-based comments with spatial context inside Trimble Connect 3D viewers
Built for teams coordinating HVAC duct BIM reviews and approvals across disciplines.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates HVAC and duct design tools used for modeling, coordination, and clash detection, including AutoCAD MEP, Revit MEP, Trimble Connect, Navisworks, and Duct Designer. The entries highlight how each platform handles duct layout creation, file interchange, collaboration workflows, and downstream review so readers can match software capabilities to project requirements.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AutoCAD MEP AutoCAD MEP supports HVAC duct layout, duct sizing workflows, and mechanical drafting in a toolchain used for building systems design. | CAD HVAC | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 |
| 2 | Revit MEP Revit supports parametric MEP modeling for HVAC duct routing, sizing coordination, and clash-aware building systems documentation. | BIM MEP | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 3 | Trimble Connect Trimble Connect manages model collaboration and coordination for MEP teams using shared BIM datasets that include HVAC duct geometry. | BIM collaboration | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 4 | Navisworks Navisworks reviews MEP model clashes and construction sequencing so HVAC duct systems can be validated against other building elements. | coordination | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 5 | Duct Designer Duct Designer focuses on HVAC duct sizing and pressure drop calculations for system design outputs used by mechanical contractors. | duct sizing | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 6 | CADMATIC HVAC CADMATIC supports MEP design automation for HVAC duct routing and documentation using model-based workflows. | CAD HVAC | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 7 | Carrier HAP (Heat Load System Design) Carrier HAP performs HVAC system load and design calculations that feed duct and equipment selection workflows for air distribution. | system design | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 8 | IES VE IES VE supports mechanical and airflow modeling used for HVAC system analysis where ducted air distribution performance must be evaluated. | HVAC simulation | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.2/10 |
AutoCAD MEP supports HVAC duct layout, duct sizing workflows, and mechanical drafting in a toolchain used for building systems design.
Revit supports parametric MEP modeling for HVAC duct routing, sizing coordination, and clash-aware building systems documentation.
Trimble Connect manages model collaboration and coordination for MEP teams using shared BIM datasets that include HVAC duct geometry.
Navisworks reviews MEP model clashes and construction sequencing so HVAC duct systems can be validated against other building elements.
Duct Designer focuses on HVAC duct sizing and pressure drop calculations for system design outputs used by mechanical contractors.
CADMATIC supports MEP design automation for HVAC duct routing and documentation using model-based workflows.
Carrier HAP performs HVAC system load and design calculations that feed duct and equipment selection workflows for air distribution.
IES VE supports mechanical and airflow modeling used for HVAC system analysis where ducted air distribution performance must be evaluated.
AutoCAD MEP
CAD HVACAutoCAD MEP supports HVAC duct layout, duct sizing workflows, and mechanical drafting in a toolchain used for building systems design.
Duct system routing with editable rules for automated layout and fitting placement
AutoCAD MEP stands out for extending AutoCAD with duct-focused modeling tools, so duct routes, fittings, and system behavior stay tied to a familiar CAD workflow. It supports rule-based duct system design, including configurable routing rules, automatic generation of ductwork from selection and constraints, and fitting insertion behavior aligned to system configuration. Core capabilities include parametric duct sizing, system properties, and detailed 2D output with standards-driven drafting that supports downstream coordination. The software also integrates with Autodesk design and documentation workflows to reduce rework between layout design and sheet sets.
Pros
- Rule-based duct routing and system constraints reduce manual duct cleanup
- Strong AutoCAD compatibility keeps 2D duct drafting workflows fast
- Configurable fittings and duct sizing behavior match established MEP standards
Cons
- Setup of system rules and styles can require time before best results
- Model edits across large duct networks can feel heavy compared to specialized tools
- Guided automation depends on correct configuration of systems and components
Best For
Teams producing consistent 2D duct plans with CAD-native control and rules
More related reading
Revit MEP
BIM MEPRevit supports parametric MEP modeling for HVAC duct routing, sizing coordination, and clash-aware building systems documentation.
Duct system routing with connectors that automatically propagates size, fittings, and system rules
Revit MEP stands out with a parametric MEP modeling workflow that ties duct geometry to building systems behavior. It supports Revit families, system types, routing, and connector-based component placement for duct and related MEP elements. For Ac Duct Design tasks like layouts, clash-prone coordination with other building disciplines, and schedule-driven documentation, it delivers model-to-drawing consistency through views and sheets. Its strength also becomes a limitation for purely 2D duct drafting, because the model-first approach demands disciplined Revit setup and families.
Pros
- Parametric duct modeling stays linked to systems, connectors, and parameters
- Automatic views and schedules keep documentation synchronized with the 3D model
- Strong coordination tools support clash discovery across disciplines in Revit projects
Cons
- Steep setup demands for duct system types, templates, and family standards
- Model-heavy workflows can slow iterations versus lightweight 2D duct drafting tools
- Highly specialized AC duct fabrication outputs require additional detailing processes
Best For
MEP design teams needing coordinated duct modeling and schedule-driven documentation
Trimble Connect
BIM collaborationTrimble Connect manages model collaboration and coordination for MEP teams using shared BIM datasets that include HVAC duct geometry.
Model-based comments with spatial context inside Trimble Connect 3D viewers
Trimble Connect stands out for cloud-backed collaboration around construction BIM data, with project-linked workspaces and markup that keep duct model revisions traceable. It supports viewing and reviewing 3D models through web and mobile experiences, making coordination artifacts accessible beyond desktop CAD. For AC duct design workflows, it helps teams manage model-based comments, approvals, and document deliverables tied to specific locations and assets. Its duct design strength depends on pairing with authoring tools like Revit or other BIM authoring and then managing results through Trimble Connect.
Pros
- Project-linked model review with clear markup and version history
- 3D web and mobile viewing reduces dependency on desktop CAD
- Structured collaboration supports approvals and coordination sign-off workflows
Cons
- Duct modeling tools are limited compared with dedicated HVAC design software
- Model quality and discipline coordination still require strong upstream BIM practices
- Advanced extraction or duct-specific calculations are not its primary focus
Best For
Teams coordinating HVAC duct BIM reviews and approvals across disciplines
More related reading
Navisworks
coordinationNavisworks reviews MEP model clashes and construction sequencing so HVAC duct systems can be validated against other building elements.
Clash Detective for automated coordination checks in federated Navisworks models
Navisworks distinguishes itself with construction-style model coordination through strong federated model viewing and review workflows. It supports clash detection, model status tracking, and rule-based searching across multi-discipline BIM datasets. For AC duct design use cases, it is strongest at validating routed duct geometry against other building systems and visualizing coordination issues in shared models. It does not function as a dedicated duct authoring application, so duct creation and parametric HVAC design depend on upstream design tools.
Pros
- Federated model review supports multi-discipline duct coordination workflows
- Clash detection finds intersections across large BIM assemblies
- Rule-based search helps isolate specific duct components quickly
Cons
- Not a duct design engine for parametric layout and sizing
- Setup of model properties and clash rules can be time-consuming
- Performance can degrade with very large federated models
Best For
BIM coordination teams validating duct routing against other systems
Duct Designer
duct sizingDuct Designer focuses on HVAC duct sizing and pressure drop calculations for system design outputs used by mechanical contractors.
Diagram-driven duct routing tied to sizing calculations for rapid revisions
Duct Designer focuses on AC duct design workflows with a calculation-first approach and diagram-driven layout. The core toolset supports sizing, duct routing layouts, and component selection for HVAC duct runs, then outputs design-ready documentation. It also emphasizes quick iteration through reusable project data, so designers can refine sizing and layout without rebuilding from scratch. The workflow fits teams that need consistent duct layouts more than teams requiring advanced simulation depth.
Pros
- Duct layout tools support efficient routing and consistent run geometry.
- Sizing workflows reduce manual calculation steps during iterative design.
- Project data reuse speeds up revisions across similar duct systems.
Cons
- Advanced engineering outputs are narrower than full HVAC simulation suites.
- Customization flexibility for nonstandard design conventions is limited.
- Getting optimal results requires HVAC domain knowledge and parameter setup.
Best For
HVAC design teams needing fast duct layout and sizing documentation
More related reading
CADMATIC HVAC
CAD HVACCADMATIC supports MEP design automation for HVAC duct routing and documentation using model-based workflows.
Object-driven duct layout and documentation that maintains consistent detailing during changes
CADMATIC HVAC is strong for designing and documenting HVAC ductwork directly inside a CAD workflow, with object-based ducts that support consistent detailing. It focuses on duct geometry, layout, and calculation-driven documentation that helps teams produce installation-ready outputs rather than just sketches. The tool also supports project data reuse across drawings, which reduces rework when routes and dimensions change. CADMATIC HVAC is best evaluated as an integrated duct design and documentation environment rather than a standalone viewer.
Pros
- Object-based duct modeling supports consistent geometry across drawings
- Duct documentation outputs reduce manual drafting effort for revisions
- Workflow supports reuse of project data to limit rework during redesigns
- Integrated HVAC duct design aligns CAD layout with specification-style details
Cons
- Learning curve is steep for teams new to CADMATIC’s HVAC workflow
- Advanced customization can require CAD-oriented configuration rather than simple forms
- Best results depend on standards setup and template discipline across projects
Best For
HVAC engineering teams producing duct drawings and documentation in CAD workflows
Carrier HAP (Heat Load System Design)
system designCarrier HAP performs HVAC system load and design calculations that feed duct and equipment selection workflows for air distribution.
Heat load calculations integrated with airside system modeling for duct sizing inputs
Carrier HAP stands out with engineering-first HVAC calculations for heat load and system sizing, including duct-related inputs for airside design workflows. It supports modeling spaces, schedules, and equipment, then generates design outputs tied to load calculations and system performance assumptions. The tool is best aligned to HVAC design and verification tasks rather than general CAD-based duct drafting. Duct design results still depend heavily on how ducts are represented through the available HVAC system modeling structure.
Pros
- Strong heat load and airside modeling foundation for HVAC design decisions
- Structured inputs for spaces and schedules reduce calculation inconsistency
- Outputs support downstream sizing workflows without custom spreadsheets
Cons
- Duct-specific geometry and layout design depth is limited versus dedicated duct CAD
- Input setup complexity can slow up front for new projects
- Iterative duct balancing workflows feel less visual than diagram-centric tools
Best For
HVAC engineers running heat load sizing and verification driving duct system parameters
More related reading
IES VE
HVAC simulationIES VE supports mechanical and airflow modeling used for HVAC system analysis where ducted air distribution performance must be evaluated.
Integrated whole-building HVAC and energy modeling that connects system behavior to zone outcomes
IES VE stands out with integrated building performance modeling that can drive HVAC and ductwork design workflows from shared geometry and assumptions. For AC duct design, it supports airflow and thermal load context through its HVAC and ventilation simulation capabilities and ties results to whole-building energy performance outputs. The best fit is projects that need duct sizing decisions coordinated with room conditions, plant operation, and compliance-style performance checks rather than standalone duct drafting.
Pros
- Whole-building simulation links duct design assumptions to room and energy performance
- HVAC modeling supports airflow and thermal context beyond duct-only calculations
- Visualization tools help review duct-related impacts on zone conditions
- Workflow supports iterative refinement across plant, zones, and system behavior
Cons
- Duct-specific detailing is less direct than dedicated duct design CAD tools
- Model setup and HVAC configuration require significant upfront effort
- Interpreting airflow outputs for duct sizing can be slower for duct-focused tasks
Best For
Teams coordinating ductwork design with building performance and compliance workflows
How to Choose the Right Ac Duct Design Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to select Ac Duct Design Software by matching duct drafting, duct sizing, and coordination capabilities to real design workflows. It covers tools like AutoCAD MEP, Revit MEP, Duct Designer, CADMATIC HVAC, and engineering-focused calculators like Carrier HAP and IES VE. It also maps collaboration and coordination tools like Trimble Connect and Navisworks to duct design delivery requirements.
What Is Ac Duct Design Software?
Ac Duct Design Software helps teams create HVAC duct layouts, size duct runs, place fittings, and document duct systems for installation and coordination. Some tools center on CAD-native duct routing and rule-based fitting insertion such as AutoCAD MEP. Other tools center on parametric building-system models with connector-based propagation such as Revit MEP. Teams that need analysis-driven decisions often pair duct geometry with engineering calculations in Carrier HAP or performance simulation in IES VE.
Key Features to Look For
Duct design quality depends on how reliably a tool turns routing intent into consistent geometry, sizing behavior, documentation, and coordination artifacts.
Rule-based duct routing and fitting placement
AutoCAD MEP uses editable duct system routing rules so duct routes, fittings, and system behavior stay aligned to defined constraints. This reduces manual cleanup when duct networks change because fitting insertion behavior follows system configuration.
Connector-based parametric duct propagation
Revit MEP supports connector-based component placement so duct size, fittings, and system rules can propagate through the model. This model-first behavior keeps schedule-driven documentation synchronized across views and sheets.
Diagram-driven duct routing tied to sizing calculations
Duct Designer focuses on diagram-driven duct routing that is tied directly to duct sizing workflows. That linkage speeds iterative revisions because layout decisions and sizing inputs move together in one workflow.
Object-based duct modeling that preserves consistent detailing
CADMATIC HVAC uses object-driven ducts to keep duct layout and documentation consistent during changes. This supports installation-ready drawing outputs without forcing teams back into repetitive manual drafting.
Integrated HVAC engineering calculations for airside inputs
Carrier HAP integrates heat load and airside modeling so outputs feed duct and equipment selection workflows. This approach supports HVAC engineers who drive duct system parameters from heat load sizing and verification rather than duct-only CAD drafting.
Whole-building HVAC and energy context for duct assumptions
IES VE connects HVAC and ventilation simulation to whole-building energy performance outputs. This supports projects where duct sizing decisions must align with zone outcomes, plant assumptions, and compliance-style performance checks.
How to Choose the Right Ac Duct Design Software
The right choice matches duct geometry creation and sizing depth to the project’s delivery goals and coordination workflow.
Start with the deliverable type: CAD drafting, parametric BIM, or engineering outputs
Teams producing consistent 2D duct plans with CAD-native control should evaluate AutoCAD MEP because its duct system routing uses editable rules for automated layout and fitting placement. Teams needing model-to-drawing consistency and schedule-driven documentation should evaluate Revit MEP because connectors and system rules propagate duct sizing and fittings through the model.
Choose routing intelligence based on how duct changes should behave
For constraint-driven routing and faster cleanup after edits, AutoCAD MEP’s rule-based routing and fitting insertion behavior is built around system configuration. For connector-based propagation during coordination iterations, Revit MEP’s connector system helps maintain size and fitting consistency when rerouting.
Match sizing and calculation depth to the design workflow
For quick duct sizing and pressure-drop-oriented documentation with diagram-driven layout, Duct Designer provides a calculation-first workflow that supports rapid revisions. For heat load and airside modeling that feeds duct and equipment selection decisions, Carrier HAP integrates heat load calculations with airside system inputs.
Plan coordination and review workflows before committing to duct authoring
If HVAC duct models must be reviewed and approved across teams with spatial context, Trimble Connect supports model-based comments tied to locations and assets inside 3D viewers. If coordination checks against other discipline elements matter most, Navisworks supports Clash Detective for automated clash checks in federated models.
Use performance modeling when duct design assumptions must map to zone and energy outcomes
If ducted air distribution performance must link to zone conditions and whole-building energy results, IES VE connects HVAC and ventilation simulation to system behavior and energy outputs. For projects focused on HVAC engineering decisions that drive duct system parameters from heat load sizing, Carrier HAP supports airside system modeling that produces duct-related sizing inputs.
Who Needs Ac Duct Design Software?
Ac Duct Design Software fits distinct duct work patterns that range from CAD-native drafting to parametric BIM coordination and engineering-driven sizing.
CAD-native duct plan teams
AutoCAD MEP is the best fit for teams producing consistent 2D duct plans with rule-based duct system routing and fitting placement. This audience benefits from CAD-native workflows where duct routing rules reduce manual duct cleanup.
MEP design teams doing coordinated BIM duct modeling and schedules
Revit MEP is designed for MEP teams needing parametric duct modeling tied to systems with connector-based behavior. Teams gain automatic views and schedules that keep documentation synchronized with the 3D model.
Duct reviewers and approvers managing model comments across disciplines
Trimble Connect suits teams that coordinate HVAC duct BIM reviews and approvals using project-linked workspaces and spatial-context markup in 3D viewers. It works best when duct modeling is handled in an authoring tool and coordination is managed through Trimble Connect.
BIM coordination teams validating duct routing against other building systems
Navisworks fits BIM coordination teams that must validate routed duct geometry against other building elements. Clash Detective supports automated coordination checks in federated Navisworks models.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Common failures happen when teams select tools for duct authoring while their primary need is coordination, performance modeling, or calculation-driven decisioning.
Selecting a coordination-only tool for duct authoring
Navisworks and Trimble Connect support review and coordination workflows but they do not function as dedicated duct authoring engines. For duct creation and parametric duct behavior, teams should use AutoCAD MEP or Revit MEP.
Skipping rule and template setup for rule-driven or connector-driven workflows
AutoCAD MEP depends on correct configuration of system rules and styles for guided automation to produce consistent routing and fittings. Revit MEP also requires disciplined setup of duct system types, templates, and families to avoid slow iterations.
Using duct-only drafting tools when heat-load-driven decisions control the design
Carrier HAP is built around heat load and airside modeling for HVAC design decisions that feed duct and equipment selection. Duct Designer accelerates duct layout and sizing documentation, but heat-load verification and airside assumptions are handled more completely through Carrier HAP.
Ignoring whole-building consequences of duct design assumptions
IES VE ties duct-related assumptions to HVAC and energy performance results across zones. Projects that require compliance-style performance checks should avoid treating duct sizing as a purely duct-only activity.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. Features carry a weight of 0.4, ease of use carries a weight of 0.3, and value carries a weight of 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. AutoCAD MEP separated itself by scoring strongly on features through duct system routing with editable rules that support automated layout and fitting placement while keeping CAD-native 2D drafting workflows fast.
Frequently Asked Questions About Ac Duct Design Software
Which AC duct design tools create geometry automatically from routing rules instead of manual drafting?
AutoCAD MEP generates ductwork using rule-based routing and editable constraints, then places fittings according to system configuration. CADMATIC HVAC also uses object-driven ducts that keep layout and documentation consistent when routes and dimensions change. Revit MEP relies on connector-based routing and system types to propagate duct sizes and fittings through the model.
What software best supports coordinated ductwork documentation with schedules and sheets?
Revit MEP supports duct routing tied to system types and connector behavior, and it produces schedule-driven documentation through views and sheets. AutoCAD MEP supports standards-driven 2D output that integrates with Autodesk design and documentation workflows. CADMATIC HVAC focuses on calculation-driven duct documentation inside CAD drawings to reduce rework during revisions.
Which tool is best for clash detection and validating duct routes against other BIM disciplines?
Navisworks excels at federated model coordination with clash detection, model status tracking, and rule-based searching across multi-discipline datasets. Trimble Connect supports model-based review with spatially anchored comments for traced model revisions. Revit MEP helps prevent downstream issues through connector-based routing, but it still requires separate coordination checks for cross-discipline validation.
Which applications are suited for diagram-driven duct layout tied to sizing calculations?
Duct Designer uses a calculation-first workflow with diagram-driven layout, then outputs design-ready documentation for consistent HVAC duct runs. CADMATIC HVAC emphasizes calculation-driven documentation tied to object-based duct geometry, which supports installation-ready outputs. Carrier HAP focuses on load and system sizing calculations, which then drive duct parameters through the available HVAC system modeling structure.
What tool fits teams that want web and mobile access to duct model reviews and approvals?
Trimble Connect is built for cloud-backed collaboration, using project-linked workspaces and model-based markup inside web and mobile viewers. It keeps review artifacts tied to specific spatial locations and model revisions. Navisworks supports desktop-style coordination workflows but is not a dedicated duct authoring environment.
Which software is best for duct design driven by thermal load, airflow assumptions, and performance outputs?
Carrier HAP integrates heat load system design with HVAC equipment and airside system modeling to generate outputs tied to design assumptions used for duct-related sizing inputs. IES VE connects duct-related design decisions to whole-building HVAC and energy performance modeling and zone outcomes. These tools prioritize engineering verification over standalone CAD drafting of duct geometry.
When should duct designers avoid a pure 2D drafting workflow and switch to model-first HVAC duct modeling?
Revit MEP can outperform 2D-only drafting when connector behavior, system types, and schedule-driven documentation must stay consistent across revisions. AutoCAD MEP supports duct-focused modeling inside a familiar CAD workflow with rule-based routing that reduces manual rework. Navisworks and Trimble Connect support validation and review on top of duct geometry authored elsewhere.
What common workflow reduces rework when duct routes and dimensions change after layout decisions?
CADMATIC HVAC supports project data reuse across drawings so route and dimension changes propagate through consistent detailing and documentation. AutoCAD MEP ties duct layout and fitting insertion to system properties and editable routing rules to maintain consistency. Revit MEP maintains model-to-drawing alignment through views and sheets, which reduces discrepancies during re-routing.
How do teams typically structure the software stack between duct authoring, coordination, and performance verification?
Revit MEP or AutoCAD MEP can author duct geometry, then Navisworks performs federated coordination checks and clash detection across discipline models. Trimble Connect overlays collaborative model review and markup on top of authoring tools like Revit. Carrier HAP and IES VE add performance and load verification layers that feed duct sizing parameters through HVAC system modeling structures.
Conclusion
After evaluating 8 construction infrastructure, AutoCAD MEP stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Construction Infrastructure alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of construction infrastructure tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare construction infrastructure tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.