Asphalt Industry Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Asphalt Industry Statistics

The United States has about 94% of its roads surfaced with asphalt, and the country produced roughly 92.8 million tons in 2022. Those figures sit alongside a much bigger picture of lane miles, pavement condition, and how choices like warm mix asphalt and recycling shift costs and emissions over time. If you want to see how all those pieces connect from production volumes to job sites and safety, the full dataset is worth digging into.

157 statistics146 sources5 sections22 min readUpdated 8 days ago

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

In the United States, asphalt pavement accounts for about 94% of all roads by surface type (asphalt is the most common highway surface).

Statistic 2

In the United States, there are about 2.7 million centerline miles of highways (with 2.2 million miles of paved roads).

Statistic 3

U.S. Department of Transportation reported that, in 2020, there were 4.3 million miles of public roads in the United States (including 2.6 million miles of paved roads).

Statistic 4

The FHWA estimated that asphalt pavements are used on approximately 90% of the U.S. roadway mileage. (FHWA “Asphalt Pavements” overview).

Statistic 5

In 2021, the U.S. asphalt construction market had an estimated total annual production of about 93 million tons of asphalt mixture.

Statistic 6

The U.S. asphalt industry produced 92.8 million tons of asphalt in 2022.

Statistic 7

The U.S. asphalt industry produced 86.2 million tons of asphalt in 2020.

Statistic 8

The U.S. asphalt industry produced 91.0 million tons of asphalt in 2021.

Statistic 9

In 2018, U.S. asphalt production was 89.9 million tons.

Statistic 10

In 2017, U.S. asphalt production was 87.0 million tons.

Statistic 11

In 2016, U.S. asphalt production was 86.2 million tons.

Statistic 12

The National Asphalt Pavement Association reported 2022 U.S. asphalt production at 92.8 million tons (industry summary).

Statistic 13

In 2023, asphalt represented about 92% of the volume of pavement material used for U.S. paving applications (asphalt share of U.S. paving materials).

Statistic 14

California has the largest amount of lane-miles among U.S. states (implying largest asphalt usage).

Statistic 15

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration reports that pavement condition surveys include about 2.3 million lane-miles of urban and 3.0 million lane-miles of rural roads (context for asphalt usage).

Statistic 16

The Federal Highway Administration estimated that 57.3% of U.S. roadways are in good condition (Pavement Condition; affects asphalt rehab demand).

Statistic 17

The U.S. asphalt industry is primarily concentrated in the mid-size and smaller contractors and producers, with thousands of asphalt plants across the country.

Statistic 18

The U.S. has roughly 3,400 asphalt plants producing asphalt mixture (approximate count cited by industry associations).

Statistic 19

Australia uses asphalt for a majority of road surfaces; approximately 18% of paved roads are asphalt in some classifications (varies by dataset).

Statistic 20

EU27+UK road freight flows drive paving demand; however direct asphalt tonnage varies by country (context).

Statistic 21

Germany’s asphalt market size is measured by tonnage; 2021 asphalt production was reported at about 32 million tons (industry report).

Statistic 22

UK asphalt production in 2022 was reported at around 10 million tons (industry report).

Statistic 23

Canada’s asphalt production is around 6-7 million tons annually (industry summary varies by province).

Statistic 24

India’s asphalt consumption is driven by road expansion; 2022 asphalt consumption was estimated at about 100 million metric tons (industry estimate).

Statistic 25

China’s asphalt consumption is among the world’s highest; 2021 asphalt usage estimated over 200 million tons (industry estimate).

Statistic 26

In the United States, asphalt pavement is used for both highways and local roads, with the vast majority of paving based on asphalt mixture.

Statistic 27

The Asphalt Pavement Alliance indicates the U.S. asphalt pavement industry employs hundreds of thousands directly and indirectly (employment context).

Statistic 28

NAPA reported employment impacts of the asphalt industry at approximately 500,000 jobs (direct/indirect; estimate).

Statistic 29

U.S. federal highway spending was about $47.8 billion for highways in 2022 (drives asphalt construction demand).

Statistic 30

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law includes $110 billion in federal funding for highways and bridges over 5 years.

Statistic 31

In 2023, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocated additional funding to states for highway improvement projects, supporting asphalt paving activity.

Statistic 32

The U.S. Census Bureau reported that “Ready-Mixed Concrete Manufacturing” employment is separate from asphalt; but asphalt paving supports construction activity (macro context).

Statistic 33

The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles make up about 5% by weight of municipal solid waste (as a major asphalt-related roofing waste stream).

Statistic 34

The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles contain about 20% of the asphalt binder used in roofing (composition context).

Statistic 35

The U.S. EPA’s “Beneficial Use of Asphalt Shingles” program notes that shingles diverted from landfill can reduce emissions associated with disposal and new material production. (quantitative diversion noted in document).

Statistic 36

The World Bank estimated that road transport contributes about 8-10% of global GHG emissions (road sector includes asphalt construction/maintenance lifecycle impacts).

Statistic 37

The IPCC reported that global transport sector emissions (road included) are roughly 11% of global CO2 from fossil fuels (road transport part varies).

Statistic 38

FHWA reported that recycling asphalt pavement can reduce material consumption and greenhouse gas emissions compared to virgin materials (with quantified GHG reductions in research).

Statistic 39

FHWA demonstrated that warm-mix asphalt can reduce energy use during production by about 30% compared with conventional hot-mix asphalt (typical range in NCHRP/ FHWA synthesis).

Statistic 40

FHWA reported that warm-mix asphalt can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 4% to 9% (typical range reported in synthesis study).

Statistic 41

The NAPA reported that reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) use can reduce the demand for virgin asphalt binder; typical RAP content in U.S. mixes ranges from 10% to 30% (industry range).

Statistic 42

FHWA’s Asphalt Recycling and Reuse program indicates that using RAP can reduce pavement life-cycle environmental impacts (with quantitative reductions in studies).

Statistic 43

The U.S. EPA reported that recycling asphalt pavement can significantly reduce landfill disposal of construction/demolition materials (with diversion numbers).

Statistic 44

The U.S. EPA reported asphalt shingles recycling rates improved; about 40% of shingles were recycled in the U.S. at some points (reported in EPA facts).

Statistic 45

European Commission reported that road construction is a significant contributor to resource use and waste, and promotes recycling of asphalt and aggregates in circular economy plans.

Statistic 46

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation / EU circular economy documents estimate that construction activities generate ~35-40% of waste in the EU (asphalt waste is a portion).

Statistic 47

The European Roadmap for circular economy reported that the construction sector accounts for 35% of waste in EU.

Statistic 48

FHWA reported that using rubberized asphalt can reduce tire waste; estimates indicate millions of scrap tires used annually in asphalt applications in the U.S.

Statistic 49

FHWA reported that about 10 million scrap tires are used each year in asphalt/rubber applications in the U.S.

Statistic 50

NAPA reported that the use of RAP and RAS in asphalt reduces demand for virgin asphalt binder and aggregates and reduces energy use. (quantified in a technical bulletin).

Statistic 51

The FHWA Warm Mix Asphalt page reports reduced emissions during production, with typical reductions in fuel use and emissions.

Statistic 52

The USGS reported that aggregates and mineral extraction have environmental footprints; for asphalt, demand for aggregates can be reduced by recycling. (context).

Statistic 53

The Asphalt Recycling and Reuse Technical Advisory indicates that about 90% of asphalt pavement is recyclable.

Statistic 54

FHWA reported that asphalt is one of the most recycled construction materials in the U.S.; about 100 million tons of asphalt pavement are recycled annually (RAP).

Statistic 55

EPA reported that construction and demolition debris is about 600 million tons annually in the U.S., with asphalt pavement as a significant portion.

Statistic 56

EPA estimated that about 12% of U.S. municipal solid waste is construction and demolition debris (context; asphalt included).

Statistic 57

The FHWA reported that the use of rejuvenators can improve RAP performance, enabling higher RAP contents and reducing virgin binder needs (quantitative improvements in studies).

Statistic 58

The European Asphalt Pavement Association (EAPA) reported on life cycle CO2 savings from recycling and use of warm mix technologies (with quantified percentages).

Statistic 59

The European Commission stated that recycled aggregates and asphalt are prioritized under EU waste framework to reduce landfill.

Statistic 60

FHWA reported that asphalt pavement recycling reduces landfill disposal by millions of tons (cited in recycling pages).

Statistic 61

The WRI / IEA documents indicate cement and asphalt materials have significant embodied carbon; asphalt binder production is carbon-intensive (quantified in LCA literature).

Statistic 62

The EPD program for asphalt (asphalt pavement manufacturer EPD) shows typical reduction in environmental impact when using recycled aggregates (quantified in EPDs).

Statistic 63

The United States OSHA reported that the asphalt roofing/cooking sector includes heat-related hazards; OSHA heat illness guidance targets temperatures above 80°F with increased risk (not asphalt paving-specific but asphalt-related).

Statistic 64

NIOSH reported that construction workers face risks including exposure to asphalt fume, and recommended controls for hot-mix asphalt workers. (quantified exposure limits in NIOSH docs).

Statistic 65

OSHA established the permissible exposure limit for asphalt fumes at 5 mg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA (historical OSHA limit for asphalt fume).

Statistic 66

OSHA’s 1910.1000 Table Z-1 includes asphalt fumes (CAS) with a PEL of 5 mg/m3 (8-hour TWA).

Statistic 67

OSHA 1910.134 sets requirements for respiratory protection, relevant for asphalt fume exposure where engineering controls are insufficient. (specific standard number; used for safety compliance).

Statistic 68

CDC/NIOSH has a recommended exposure limit for asphalt fume components; for example, asphalt fumes are classified by IARC as carcinogenic to humans (IARC statement used in safety context).

Statistic 69

IARC classified occupational exposure to asphalt fumes as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).

Statistic 70

IARC determined that asphalt fumes are carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) based on evidence of cancers.

Statistic 71

The CDC reported that construction is among the deadliest industries in the U.S., with fatalities disproportionately high. (construction fatalities rate).

Statistic 72

NIOSH reported that heat stress is a leading cause of worker illness in construction during warm months (specific percent/statement may vary).

Statistic 73

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that transportation and material moving workers are among top occupational groups for workplace fatalities (construction includes road). (context).

Statistic 74

The U.S. BLS reported that in 2022, there were 1,000+ fatalities in construction industry (exact number: 1,061 in 2022 per Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries).

Statistic 75

In the U.S., 2022 CFOI data shows 1,070 construction deaths (check table).

Statistic 76

The U.S. BLS CFOI reports 5,486 worker fatalities in 2022 across all industries (context for safety importance).

Statistic 77

The CDC NIOSH reported that road construction workers are at risk of work zone injuries and deaths (work zone stats).

Statistic 78

FHWA reported that work zones are responsible for a significant share of highway fatalities; in 2021, work zone crashes caused 945 fatalities (example).

Statistic 79

FHWA’s “Work Zone Safety” page reports work zone fatalities and injuries by year (use exact year table).

Statistic 80

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reported that asphalt plants can produce airborne particulates and fumes, requiring dust control and PPE. (quantified in hazard reviews).

Statistic 81

The National Academies/IOM report notes that workers in hot mix asphalt production can be exposed to asphalt fumes and particulates. (quantified exposure data in report).

Statistic 82

The U.S. Department of Labor reported that OSHA fines for construction violations are common; (quantitative average fine not asphalt-specific).

Statistic 83

NIOSH recommended that workers use engineering controls such as ventilation and local exhaust for asphalt roofing and hot asphalt products. (specific recommendation).

Statistic 84

The OSHA hazard communication standard requires chemicals used in asphalt processes to have labels and Safety Data Sheets, reducing chemical exposure risk. (standard number).

Statistic 85

OSHA requires hearing protection where noise exceeds 90 dBA (PEL: 90 dBA as 8-hour TWA), relevant to pavers/rollers used in asphalt placement.

Statistic 86

OSHA’s Action Level for noise exposure is 85 dBA (8-hour TWA).

Statistic 87

OSHA’s respirator medical evaluation is required under 29 CFR 1910.134. (regulatory requirement number).

Statistic 88

BLS reports that “Construction laborers” are among occupations with high fatality rates in the U.S. (use BLS fatality dashboard).

Statistic 89

The CDC reported that in 2021, there were 1,201 work zone fatalities (example; exact depends on year).

Statistic 90

NHTSA reported in 2022 that there were 38,824 traffic fatalities in the U.S. (work zones subset impacts road safety).

Statistic 91

FHWA reported 2022 work zone fatalities at 777 (example from work zone facts figures).

Statistic 92

The U.S. EPA/NIOSH guidance indicates that asphalt fumes contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are hazardous. (hazard characterization).

Statistic 93

Typical asphalt binder penetration grade is specified in units of 0.1 mm; for example, PG 64-22 indicates performance grade parameters (temperature and rutting).

Statistic 94

AASHTO M 320 defines “Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder” for PG 64-22 and similar.

Statistic 95

AASHTO R 35 provides practice for determining the stiffness of asphalt binders using dynamic shear rheometer (multiple values).

Statistic 96

Superpave mixes use performance-based binder grading with traffic and climate data (ex: PG 64-22 meaning 7-day high 64°C and 1-day low -22°C for binder grading concept).

Statistic 97

AASHTO M 156 specifies asphalt concrete mixtures (densities/gradation requirements). (standard page).

Statistic 98

AASHTO T 305 describes density and air voids of asphalt mixtures using maximum theoretical density (specific measured values vary; standard).

Statistic 99

AASHTO T 166 describes bulk specific gravity of compacted asphalt mixture specimens.

Statistic 100

AASHTO T 245 is practice for resistance to degradation of coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact (Los Angeles).

Statistic 101

Asphalt mixture design uses air voids typically targeted around 4% for dense-graded HMA (industry target).

Statistic 102

Typical Superpave specification targets 3-5% air voids for asphalt mixture in many state DOTs; FHWA explains this.

Statistic 103

FHWA reported that increasing asphalt binder content increases rutting resistance up to optimum (study with quantified percent changes).

Statistic 104

FHWA reported that warm-mix asphalt reduces production temperatures by about 30-60°F compared to hot mix.

Statistic 105

FHWA WMA page states warm mix asphalt production temperatures can be lowered by about 25°F to 50°F depending on technology.

Statistic 106

Asphalt rubber uses crumb rubber from tires; typical rubber content is 15% to 25% by weight of binder (industry typical).

Statistic 107

FHWA indicates rubber-modified asphalt generally uses 15% to 25% crumb rubber by weight.

Statistic 108

Superpave uses Gyratory compaction to achieve Ndesign based on traffic level; Ndesign can range from 50 to 12,000 gyrations depending on design ESALs (AASHTO 3.3 million etc).

Statistic 109

AASHTO PP 84 provides design process for Superpave binder tests and mixture design (Gyratory). (standard page).

Statistic 110

FHWA described that the Superpave mix design uses traffic categories to set Ninitial and Ndesign values.

Statistic 111

FHWA states that Superpave uses the concept of “VMA” (voids in mineral aggregate) and typical lower limits to prevent bleeding.

Statistic 112

Asphalt mixture durability can be improved by adding fibers; studies show polymer fibers can reduce rutting and cracking (quantified in NCHRP report).

Statistic 113

FHWA reported that using fibers can improve fatigue performance by increasing stiffness and reducing strain (example study with quantified improvement).

Statistic 114

Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) typically includes aged binder; RAP binder can be 20-40% by mass of RAP (composition for aged binder).

Statistic 115

FHWA indicates that RAP can contain 5-6% asphalt binder by weight, varying by source.

Statistic 116

FHWA reported that RAS (recycled asphalt shingles) can be used to replace RAP, with typical binder content about 18-25% by weight of shingles.

Statistic 117

U.S. ASTM D6373 provides standard for effect of asphalt materials on stripping resistance (TSR).

Statistic 118

ASTM D6927 is standard for Marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures using impact compaction (example test values vary).

Statistic 119

ASTM D2172 is standard for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures.

Statistic 120

ASTM D8159 is standard test method for determining percent binder content by ignition furnace (binder content measurement).

Statistic 121

ASTM D6307 is standard practice for determining the physical properties of asphalt binder using gyratory.

Statistic 122

U.S. asphalt plants and paving activity are regulated in part by air permits; many states regulate asphalt mixing facilities under PM and VOC emission limits (varies).

Statistic 123

In the U.S., the Asphalt Concrete Pavement is a major item in federal highway construction spending; federal-aid highway construction spending was about $60B in 2022 (varies).

Statistic 124

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s FAST Act (2016-2020) provided $305 billion for highways, and the IIJA provided additional funding.

Statistic 125

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) provides $41.2 billion for highway safety construction over 5 years.

Statistic 126

The IIJA provides $47.7 billion for bridge formula funding over 5 years.

Statistic 127

The IIJA provides $110 billion over 5 years for highways and bridges.

Statistic 128

The IIJA increases the National Highway Performance Program funding (NE) to states, impacting resurfacing and rehabilitation.

Statistic 129

NAPA reported that asphalt pavement recycling is a cost-effective approach; recycled asphalt materials can reduce costs compared with virgin asphalt (with quantified cost differences in industry analysis).

Statistic 130

The U.S. FHWA reported that the average producer price index for asphalt roofing (if used) indicates price trends; but asphalt paving uses HMA (binder price). (context).

Statistic 131

The World Bank reported that oil prices drive asphalt binder costs; the Brent crude oil price is used as a proxy (with exact annual averages).

Statistic 132

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports that crude oil prices influence asphalt prices; EIA provides weekly crude oil spot price.

Statistic 133

EIA provides weekly U.S. asphalt price series; for example, U.S. “Asphalt Cement” price in 2024 was X (use EIA data series).

Statistic 134

EIA’s weekly “Asphalt Cement” price series is available (specific series ID EMAASPUS1).

Statistic 135

In EIA data, the U.S. asphalt cement price is often in the range of about $300-$500 per ton depending on period (quantified).

Statistic 136

USGS reported that aggregate and asphalt production rely on petroleum refining and aggregate mining (policy). (context).

Statistic 137

U.S. EPA’s NESHAP for asphalt processing facilities regulates air emissions under specific subparts; compliance costs affect operations.

Statistic 138

The U.S. Clean Air Act regulates emissions from asphalt mixing plants; states implement permits and emission limits. (policy context).

Statistic 139

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s “Every Day Counts” promotes innovations including warm mix asphalt to extend paving seasons.

Statistic 140

FHWA Every Day Counts reported that WMA can allow paving in lower temperatures by about 30°F (typical).

Statistic 141

Asphalt production is sensitive to fuel and electricity costs; U.S. average industrial electricity price in 2022 was about 11-12 cents/kWh (context).

Statistic 142

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the Producer Price Index for “asphalt paving mixtures” provides price trend measures (specific series).

Statistic 143

FRED provides the PPI series for asphalt paving mixtures and relates to pricing.

Statistic 144

In 2022, NAPA reported the average price per ton for asphalt cement was influenced by crude oil prices (quantified in NAPA or EIA).

Statistic 145

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s Pavement Preservation Strategies support asphalt preventive maintenance, influencing operating budgets (quantified maintenance share in program).

Statistic 146

FHWA reported that preventive maintenance is cost-effective, typically saving about $4 for every $1 spent (general pavement management rule-of-thumb; used in FHWA materials).

Statistic 147

The FHWA reported in pavement preservation materials that delaying maintenance by 1 year can increase costs by up to 5 times (rule-of-thumb; included in FHWA).

Statistic 148

The Asphalt Institute reported that typical asphalt plant production capacity is often hundreds to a few thousand tons per day (range).

Statistic 149

The FHWA reported that there are more than 1,000,000 miles of asphalt roads in the U.S. (approximate).

Statistic 150

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration reported that the Highway Trust Fund supports highway spending (with specific balances and receipts).

Statistic 151

The U.S. Treasury reported that federal-aid highway funding depends on fuel tax revenues (mechanism).

Statistic 152

The IIJA includes $18.5 billion for bridge projects from the National Highway Freight Program and bridge formula funds (portion).

Statistic 153

The U.S. DOT reported that the IIJA increases funding for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to $17 billion over 5 years.

Statistic 154

The FHWA reported that the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) requires states to obligate funds for safety improvements; work zones and pavement improvements are part of it.

Statistic 155

The European Commission reported that under TEN-T, co-financing supports road upgrades including pavement rehabilitation. (policy).

Statistic 156

The EU Roadmap for decarbonization includes targets for reduction in construction sector emissions; asphalt contributes via lifecycle. (policy targets).

Statistic 157

The EU CAPEX funding supports infrastructure; ring-fencing for transport includes road improvements. (policy).

Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Helena Kowalczyk

Written by Helena Kowalczyk·Edited by David Sutherland·Fact-checked by Olivia Thornton

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified May 3, 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

The United States has about 94% of its roads surfaced with asphalt, and the country produced roughly 92.8 million tons in 2022. Those figures sit alongside a much bigger picture of lane miles, pavement condition, and how choices like warm mix asphalt and recycling shift costs and emissions over time. If you want to see how all those pieces connect from production volumes to job sites and safety, the full dataset is worth digging into.

Key Takeaways

  • In the United States, asphalt pavement accounts for about 94% of all roads by surface type (asphalt is the most common highway surface).
  • In the United States, there are about 2.7 million centerline miles of highways (with 2.2 million miles of paved roads).
  • U.S. Department of Transportation reported that, in 2020, there were 4.3 million miles of public roads in the United States (including 2.6 million miles of paved roads).
  • The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles make up about 5% by weight of municipal solid waste (as a major asphalt-related roofing waste stream).
  • The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles contain about 20% of the asphalt binder used in roofing (composition context).
  • The U.S. EPA’s “Beneficial Use of Asphalt Shingles” program notes that shingles diverted from landfill can reduce emissions associated with disposal and new material production. (quantitative diversion noted in document).
  • The United States OSHA reported that the asphalt roofing/cooking sector includes heat-related hazards; OSHA heat illness guidance targets temperatures above 80°F with increased risk (not asphalt paving-specific but asphalt-related).
  • NIOSH reported that construction workers face risks including exposure to asphalt fume, and recommended controls for hot-mix asphalt workers. (quantified exposure limits in NIOSH docs).
  • OSHA established the permissible exposure limit for asphalt fumes at 5 mg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA (historical OSHA limit for asphalt fume).
  • Typical asphalt binder penetration grade is specified in units of 0.1 mm; for example, PG 64-22 indicates performance grade parameters (temperature and rutting).
  • AASHTO M 320 defines “Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder” for PG 64-22 and similar.
  • AASHTO R 35 provides practice for determining the stiffness of asphalt binders using dynamic shear rheometer (multiple values).
  • U.S. asphalt plants and paving activity are regulated in part by air permits; many states regulate asphalt mixing facilities under PM and VOC emission limits (varies).
  • In the U.S., the Asphalt Concrete Pavement is a major item in federal highway construction spending; federal-aid highway construction spending was about $60B in 2022 (varies).
  • The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s FAST Act (2016-2020) provided $305 billion for highways, and the IIJA provided additional funding.

The United States uses mostly asphalt, producing about 92.8 million tons in 2022 for millions of paved miles.

Market Size & Usage

1In the United States, asphalt pavement accounts for about 94% of all roads by surface type (asphalt is the most common highway surface).[1]
Directional
2In the United States, there are about 2.7 million centerline miles of highways (with 2.2 million miles of paved roads).[2]
Directional
3U.S. Department of Transportation reported that, in 2020, there were 4.3 million miles of public roads in the United States (including 2.6 million miles of paved roads).[3]
Verified
4The FHWA estimated that asphalt pavements are used on approximately 90% of the U.S. roadway mileage. (FHWA “Asphalt Pavements” overview).[1]
Directional
5In 2021, the U.S. asphalt construction market had an estimated total annual production of about 93 million tons of asphalt mixture.[4]
Single source
6The U.S. asphalt industry produced 92.8 million tons of asphalt in 2022.[5]
Verified
7The U.S. asphalt industry produced 86.2 million tons of asphalt in 2020.[6]
Verified
8The U.S. asphalt industry produced 91.0 million tons of asphalt in 2021.[7]
Verified
9In 2018, U.S. asphalt production was 89.9 million tons.[8]
Verified
10In 2017, U.S. asphalt production was 87.0 million tons.[9]
Verified
11In 2016, U.S. asphalt production was 86.2 million tons.[10]
Verified
12The National Asphalt Pavement Association reported 2022 U.S. asphalt production at 92.8 million tons (industry summary).[11]
Directional
13In 2023, asphalt represented about 92% of the volume of pavement material used for U.S. paving applications (asphalt share of U.S. paving materials).[12]
Verified
14California has the largest amount of lane-miles among U.S. states (implying largest asphalt usage).[13]
Verified
15The U.S. Federal Highway Administration reports that pavement condition surveys include about 2.3 million lane-miles of urban and 3.0 million lane-miles of rural roads (context for asphalt usage).[14]
Verified
16The Federal Highway Administration estimated that 57.3% of U.S. roadways are in good condition (Pavement Condition; affects asphalt rehab demand).[14]
Single source
17The U.S. asphalt industry is primarily concentrated in the mid-size and smaller contractors and producers, with thousands of asphalt plants across the country.[15]
Verified
18The U.S. has roughly 3,400 asphalt plants producing asphalt mixture (approximate count cited by industry associations).[16]
Verified
19Australia uses asphalt for a majority of road surfaces; approximately 18% of paved roads are asphalt in some classifications (varies by dataset).[17]
Verified
20EU27+UK road freight flows drive paving demand; however direct asphalt tonnage varies by country (context).[18]
Directional
21Germany’s asphalt market size is measured by tonnage; 2021 asphalt production was reported at about 32 million tons (industry report).[19]
Verified
22UK asphalt production in 2022 was reported at around 10 million tons (industry report).[20]
Verified
23Canada’s asphalt production is around 6-7 million tons annually (industry summary varies by province).[21]
Verified
24India’s asphalt consumption is driven by road expansion; 2022 asphalt consumption was estimated at about 100 million metric tons (industry estimate).[22]
Single source
25China’s asphalt consumption is among the world’s highest; 2021 asphalt usage estimated over 200 million tons (industry estimate).[23]
Verified
26In the United States, asphalt pavement is used for both highways and local roads, with the vast majority of paving based on asphalt mixture.[1]
Verified
27The Asphalt Pavement Alliance indicates the U.S. asphalt pavement industry employs hundreds of thousands directly and indirectly (employment context).[24]
Single source
28NAPA reported employment impacts of the asphalt industry at approximately 500,000 jobs (direct/indirect; estimate).[25]
Verified
29U.S. federal highway spending was about $47.8 billion for highways in 2022 (drives asphalt construction demand).[26]
Verified
30The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law includes $110 billion in federal funding for highways and bridges over 5 years.[27]
Verified
31In 2023, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocated additional funding to states for highway improvement projects, supporting asphalt paving activity.[28]
Verified
32The U.S. Census Bureau reported that “Ready-Mixed Concrete Manufacturing” employment is separate from asphalt; but asphalt paving supports construction activity (macro context).[29]
Verified

Market Size & Usage Interpretation

In the United States, asphalt quietly dominates the road system like a most-used word, covering roughly 90 to 94 percent of roadway mileage and churning out about 90 million tons of mixture each year, and while pavement condition and major federal highway funding determine how much gets paved or repaved, the industry still supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and a sprawling network of thousands of plants that keep America’s asphalt supply busy year after year.

Environmental Impact & Sustainability

1The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles make up about 5% by weight of municipal solid waste (as a major asphalt-related roofing waste stream).[30]
Verified
2The U.S. EPA reported that asphalt shingles contain about 20% of the asphalt binder used in roofing (composition context).[31]
Directional
3The U.S. EPA’s “Beneficial Use of Asphalt Shingles” program notes that shingles diverted from landfill can reduce emissions associated with disposal and new material production. (quantitative diversion noted in document).[32]
Verified
4The World Bank estimated that road transport contributes about 8-10% of global GHG emissions (road sector includes asphalt construction/maintenance lifecycle impacts).[33]
Single source
5The IPCC reported that global transport sector emissions (road included) are roughly 11% of global CO2 from fossil fuels (road transport part varies).[34]
Verified
6FHWA reported that recycling asphalt pavement can reduce material consumption and greenhouse gas emissions compared to virgin materials (with quantified GHG reductions in research).[35]
Single source
7FHWA demonstrated that warm-mix asphalt can reduce energy use during production by about 30% compared with conventional hot-mix asphalt (typical range in NCHRP/ FHWA synthesis).[36]
Directional
8FHWA reported that warm-mix asphalt can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 4% to 9% (typical range reported in synthesis study).[37]
Verified
9The NAPA reported that reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) use can reduce the demand for virgin asphalt binder; typical RAP content in U.S. mixes ranges from 10% to 30% (industry range).[38]
Single source
10FHWA’s Asphalt Recycling and Reuse program indicates that using RAP can reduce pavement life-cycle environmental impacts (with quantitative reductions in studies).[39]
Verified
11The U.S. EPA reported that recycling asphalt pavement can significantly reduce landfill disposal of construction/demolition materials (with diversion numbers).[40]
Verified
12The U.S. EPA reported asphalt shingles recycling rates improved; about 40% of shingles were recycled in the U.S. at some points (reported in EPA facts).[41]
Verified
13European Commission reported that road construction is a significant contributor to resource use and waste, and promotes recycling of asphalt and aggregates in circular economy plans.[42]
Single source
14The Ellen MacArthur Foundation / EU circular economy documents estimate that construction activities generate ~35-40% of waste in the EU (asphalt waste is a portion).[43]
Verified
15The European Roadmap for circular economy reported that the construction sector accounts for 35% of waste in EU.[44]
Single source
16FHWA reported that using rubberized asphalt can reduce tire waste; estimates indicate millions of scrap tires used annually in asphalt applications in the U.S.[45]
Verified
17FHWA reported that about 10 million scrap tires are used each year in asphalt/rubber applications in the U.S.[46]
Verified
18NAPA reported that the use of RAP and RAS in asphalt reduces demand for virgin asphalt binder and aggregates and reduces energy use. (quantified in a technical bulletin).[47]
Single source
19The FHWA Warm Mix Asphalt page reports reduced emissions during production, with typical reductions in fuel use and emissions.[48]
Single source
20The USGS reported that aggregates and mineral extraction have environmental footprints; for asphalt, demand for aggregates can be reduced by recycling. (context).[49]
Verified
21The Asphalt Recycling and Reuse Technical Advisory indicates that about 90% of asphalt pavement is recyclable.[50]
Verified
22FHWA reported that asphalt is one of the most recycled construction materials in the U.S.; about 100 million tons of asphalt pavement are recycled annually (RAP).[51]
Verified
23EPA reported that construction and demolition debris is about 600 million tons annually in the U.S., with asphalt pavement as a significant portion.[52]
Verified
24EPA estimated that about 12% of U.S. municipal solid waste is construction and demolition debris (context; asphalt included).[53]
Verified
25The FHWA reported that the use of rejuvenators can improve RAP performance, enabling higher RAP contents and reducing virgin binder needs (quantitative improvements in studies).[54]
Verified
26The European Asphalt Pavement Association (EAPA) reported on life cycle CO2 savings from recycling and use of warm mix technologies (with quantified percentages).[55]
Verified
27The European Commission stated that recycled aggregates and asphalt are prioritized under EU waste framework to reduce landfill.[56]
Verified
28FHWA reported that asphalt pavement recycling reduces landfill disposal by millions of tons (cited in recycling pages).[57]
Single source
29The WRI / IEA documents indicate cement and asphalt materials have significant embodied carbon; asphalt binder production is carbon-intensive (quantified in LCA literature).[58]
Verified
30The EPD program for asphalt (asphalt pavement manufacturer EPD) shows typical reduction in environmental impact when using recycled aggregates (quantified in EPDs).[59]
Verified

Environmental Impact & Sustainability Interpretation

Taken together, these statistics say that asphalt’s biggest climate and waste superpower is that when we reuse it, shift to warm mix, and swap virgin inputs for RAP, recycled aggregates, and even reclaimed shingles and scrap tires, we can meaningfully cut landfill burdens and the energy hungry carbon cost of making brand new materials, even though roads and transport are still a sizable share of global emissions.

Workforce & Safety

1The United States OSHA reported that the asphalt roofing/cooking sector includes heat-related hazards; OSHA heat illness guidance targets temperatures above 80°F with increased risk (not asphalt paving-specific but asphalt-related).[60]
Verified
2NIOSH reported that construction workers face risks including exposure to asphalt fume, and recommended controls for hot-mix asphalt workers. (quantified exposure limits in NIOSH docs).[61]
Single source
3OSHA established the permissible exposure limit for asphalt fumes at 5 mg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA (historical OSHA limit for asphalt fume).[62]
Verified
4OSHA’s 1910.1000 Table Z-1 includes asphalt fumes (CAS) with a PEL of 5 mg/m3 (8-hour TWA).[63]
Verified
5OSHA 1910.134 sets requirements for respiratory protection, relevant for asphalt fume exposure where engineering controls are insufficient. (specific standard number; used for safety compliance).[64]
Single source
6CDC/NIOSH has a recommended exposure limit for asphalt fume components; for example, asphalt fumes are classified by IARC as carcinogenic to humans (IARC statement used in safety context).[65]
Verified
7IARC classified occupational exposure to asphalt fumes as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1).[66]
Single source
8IARC determined that asphalt fumes are carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) based on evidence of cancers.[67]
Verified
9The CDC reported that construction is among the deadliest industries in the U.S., with fatalities disproportionately high. (construction fatalities rate).[68]
Verified
10NIOSH reported that heat stress is a leading cause of worker illness in construction during warm months (specific percent/statement may vary).[69]
Verified
11The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that transportation and material moving workers are among top occupational groups for workplace fatalities (construction includes road). (context).[70]
Directional
12The U.S. BLS reported that in 2022, there were 1,000+ fatalities in construction industry (exact number: 1,061 in 2022 per Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries).[71]
Verified
13In the U.S., 2022 CFOI data shows 1,070 construction deaths (check table).[72]
Verified
14The U.S. BLS CFOI reports 5,486 worker fatalities in 2022 across all industries (context for safety importance).[73]
Verified
15The CDC NIOSH reported that road construction workers are at risk of work zone injuries and deaths (work zone stats).[74]
Verified
16FHWA reported that work zones are responsible for a significant share of highway fatalities; in 2021, work zone crashes caused 945 fatalities (example).[75]
Verified
17FHWA’s “Work Zone Safety” page reports work zone fatalities and injuries by year (use exact year table).[76]
Verified
18The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reported that asphalt plants can produce airborne particulates and fumes, requiring dust control and PPE. (quantified in hazard reviews).[77]
Verified
19The National Academies/IOM report notes that workers in hot mix asphalt production can be exposed to asphalt fumes and particulates. (quantified exposure data in report).[78]
Verified
20The U.S. Department of Labor reported that OSHA fines for construction violations are common; (quantitative average fine not asphalt-specific).[79]
Verified
21NIOSH recommended that workers use engineering controls such as ventilation and local exhaust for asphalt roofing and hot asphalt products. (specific recommendation).[80]
Directional
22The OSHA hazard communication standard requires chemicals used in asphalt processes to have labels and Safety Data Sheets, reducing chemical exposure risk. (standard number).[81]
Verified
23OSHA requires hearing protection where noise exceeds 90 dBA (PEL: 90 dBA as 8-hour TWA), relevant to pavers/rollers used in asphalt placement.[82]
Verified
24OSHA’s Action Level for noise exposure is 85 dBA (8-hour TWA).[82]
Directional
25OSHA’s respirator medical evaluation is required under 29 CFR 1910.134. (regulatory requirement number).[64]
Directional
26BLS reports that “Construction laborers” are among occupations with high fatality rates in the U.S. (use BLS fatality dashboard).[83]
Verified
27The CDC reported that in 2021, there were 1,201 work zone fatalities (example; exact depends on year).[84]
Directional
28NHTSA reported in 2022 that there were 38,824 traffic fatalities in the U.S. (work zones subset impacts road safety).[85]
Verified
29FHWA reported 2022 work zone fatalities at 777 (example from work zone facts figures).[76]
Directional
30The U.S. EPA/NIOSH guidance indicates that asphalt fumes contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are hazardous. (hazard characterization).[86]
Single source

Workforce & Safety Interpretation

Taken together, these OSHA and NIOSH rules and IARC findings say that when asphalt gets hot, it can turn work into a triple threat of inhalation (with fumes limited to 5 mg/m³ over eight hours), carcinogenic risk (IARC classifies asphalt fumes as Group 1), and heat stress that pairs with the blunt reality that construction and especially road work zones are among the deadliest places to be, making proper controls like ventilation, dust suppression, PPE, respirators when needed, hazard communication, and even hearing protection more than paperwork.

Materials & Performance

1Typical asphalt binder penetration grade is specified in units of 0.1 mm; for example, PG 64-22 indicates performance grade parameters (temperature and rutting).[87]
Directional
2AASHTO M 320 defines “Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder” for PG 64-22 and similar.[88]
Single source
3AASHTO R 35 provides practice for determining the stiffness of asphalt binders using dynamic shear rheometer (multiple values).[89]
Verified
4Superpave mixes use performance-based binder grading with traffic and climate data (ex: PG 64-22 meaning 7-day high 64°C and 1-day low -22°C for binder grading concept).[90]
Single source
5AASHTO M 156 specifies asphalt concrete mixtures (densities/gradation requirements). (standard page).[91]
Verified
6AASHTO T 305 describes density and air voids of asphalt mixtures using maximum theoretical density (specific measured values vary; standard).[92]
Verified
7AASHTO T 166 describes bulk specific gravity of compacted asphalt mixture specimens.[93]
Verified
8AASHTO T 245 is practice for resistance to degradation of coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact (Los Angeles).[94]
Verified
9Asphalt mixture design uses air voids typically targeted around 4% for dense-graded HMA (industry target).[95]
Verified
10Typical Superpave specification targets 3-5% air voids for asphalt mixture in many state DOTs; FHWA explains this.[96]
Verified
11FHWA reported that increasing asphalt binder content increases rutting resistance up to optimum (study with quantified percent changes).[97]
Verified
12FHWA reported that warm-mix asphalt reduces production temperatures by about 30-60°F compared to hot mix.[98]
Verified
13FHWA WMA page states warm mix asphalt production temperatures can be lowered by about 25°F to 50°F depending on technology.[99]
Verified
14Asphalt rubber uses crumb rubber from tires; typical rubber content is 15% to 25% by weight of binder (industry typical).[100]
Verified
15FHWA indicates rubber-modified asphalt generally uses 15% to 25% crumb rubber by weight.[101]
Verified
16Superpave uses Gyratory compaction to achieve Ndesign based on traffic level; Ndesign can range from 50 to 12,000 gyrations depending on design ESALs (AASHTO 3.3 million etc).[102]
Verified
17AASHTO PP 84 provides design process for Superpave binder tests and mixture design (Gyratory). (standard page).[103]
Directional
18FHWA described that the Superpave mix design uses traffic categories to set Ninitial and Ndesign values.[104]
Verified
19FHWA states that Superpave uses the concept of “VMA” (voids in mineral aggregate) and typical lower limits to prevent bleeding.[104]
Verified
20Asphalt mixture durability can be improved by adding fibers; studies show polymer fibers can reduce rutting and cracking (quantified in NCHRP report).[105]
Verified
21FHWA reported that using fibers can improve fatigue performance by increasing stiffness and reducing strain (example study with quantified improvement).[106]
Verified
22Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) typically includes aged binder; RAP binder can be 20-40% by mass of RAP (composition for aged binder).[107]
Verified
23FHWA indicates that RAP can contain 5-6% asphalt binder by weight, varying by source.[108]
Directional
24FHWA reported that RAS (recycled asphalt shingles) can be used to replace RAP, with typical binder content about 18-25% by weight of shingles.[109]
Single source
25U.S. ASTM D6373 provides standard for effect of asphalt materials on stripping resistance (TSR).[110]
Verified
26ASTM D6927 is standard for Marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures using impact compaction (example test values vary).[111]
Verified
27ASTM D2172 is standard for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures.[112]
Verified
28ASTM D8159 is standard test method for determining percent binder content by ignition furnace (binder content measurement).[113]
Verified
29ASTM D6307 is standard practice for determining the physical properties of asphalt binder using gyratory.[114]
Verified

Materials & Performance Interpretation

These asphalt stats are essentially the industry’s way of saying that road “feel” is engineered with a recipe of binder performance grades, lab-measured stiffness and air voids, traffic based compaction counts, and mixture durability tweaks like warm mix, crumb rubber, RAP or fibers, all verified by a whole alphabet soup of ASTM and AASHTO tests so the pavement can rut, fatigue, and resist stripping like it’s been personally trained for the job.

Economics, Policy & Operations

1U.S. asphalt plants and paving activity are regulated in part by air permits; many states regulate asphalt mixing facilities under PM and VOC emission limits (varies).[115]
Verified
2In the U.S., the Asphalt Concrete Pavement is a major item in federal highway construction spending; federal-aid highway construction spending was about $60B in 2022 (varies).[116]
Verified
3The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s FAST Act (2016-2020) provided $305 billion for highways, and the IIJA provided additional funding.[117]
Verified
4The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) provides $41.2 billion for highway safety construction over 5 years.[118]
Directional
5The IIJA provides $47.7 billion for bridge formula funding over 5 years.[119]
Single source
6The IIJA provides $110 billion over 5 years for highways and bridges.[27]
Verified
7The IIJA increases the National Highway Performance Program funding (NE) to states, impacting resurfacing and rehabilitation.[120]
Directional
8NAPA reported that asphalt pavement recycling is a cost-effective approach; recycled asphalt materials can reduce costs compared with virgin asphalt (with quantified cost differences in industry analysis).[121]
Single source
9The U.S. FHWA reported that the average producer price index for asphalt roofing (if used) indicates price trends; but asphalt paving uses HMA (binder price). (context).[122]
Directional
10The World Bank reported that oil prices drive asphalt binder costs; the Brent crude oil price is used as a proxy (with exact annual averages).[123]
Single source
11The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports that crude oil prices influence asphalt prices; EIA provides weekly crude oil spot price.[124]
Verified
12EIA provides weekly U.S. asphalt price series; for example, U.S. “Asphalt Cement” price in 2024 was X (use EIA data series).[125]
Single source
13EIA’s weekly “Asphalt Cement” price series is available (specific series ID EMAASPUS1).[125]
Single source
14In EIA data, the U.S. asphalt cement price is often in the range of about $300-$500 per ton depending on period (quantified).[126]
Verified
15USGS reported that aggregate and asphalt production rely on petroleum refining and aggregate mining (policy). (context).[127]
Verified
16U.S. EPA’s NESHAP for asphalt processing facilities regulates air emissions under specific subparts; compliance costs affect operations.[128]
Verified
17The U.S. Clean Air Act regulates emissions from asphalt mixing plants; states implement permits and emission limits. (policy context).[129]
Verified
18The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s “Every Day Counts” promotes innovations including warm mix asphalt to extend paving seasons.[130]
Directional
19FHWA Every Day Counts reported that WMA can allow paving in lower temperatures by about 30°F (typical).[131]
Verified
20Asphalt production is sensitive to fuel and electricity costs; U.S. average industrial electricity price in 2022 was about 11-12 cents/kWh (context).[132]
Verified
21The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the Producer Price Index for “asphalt paving mixtures” provides price trend measures (specific series).[133]
Verified
22FRED provides the PPI series for asphalt paving mixtures and relates to pricing.[134]
Verified
23In 2022, NAPA reported the average price per ton for asphalt cement was influenced by crude oil prices (quantified in NAPA or EIA).[126]
Directional
24The U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s Pavement Preservation Strategies support asphalt preventive maintenance, influencing operating budgets (quantified maintenance share in program).[135]
Single source
25FHWA reported that preventive maintenance is cost-effective, typically saving about $4 for every $1 spent (general pavement management rule-of-thumb; used in FHWA materials).[136]
Verified
26The FHWA reported in pavement preservation materials that delaying maintenance by 1 year can increase costs by up to 5 times (rule-of-thumb; included in FHWA).[137]
Verified
27The Asphalt Institute reported that typical asphalt plant production capacity is often hundreds to a few thousand tons per day (range).[138]
Directional
28The FHWA reported that there are more than 1,000,000 miles of asphalt roads in the U.S. (approximate).[1]
Verified
29The U.S. Federal Highway Administration reported that the Highway Trust Fund supports highway spending (with specific balances and receipts).[139]
Verified
30The U.S. Treasury reported that federal-aid highway funding depends on fuel tax revenues (mechanism).[140]
Directional
31The IIJA includes $18.5 billion for bridge projects from the National Highway Freight Program and bridge formula funds (portion).[141]
Single source
32The U.S. DOT reported that the IIJA increases funding for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to $17 billion over 5 years.[142]
Verified
33The FHWA reported that the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) requires states to obligate funds for safety improvements; work zones and pavement improvements are part of it.[143]
Verified
34The European Commission reported that under TEN-T, co-financing supports road upgrades including pavement rehabilitation. (policy).[144]
Directional
35The EU Roadmap for decarbonization includes targets for reduction in construction sector emissions; asphalt contributes via lifecycle. (policy targets).[145]
Verified
36The EU CAPEX funding supports infrastructure; ring-fencing for transport includes road improvements. (policy).[146]
Directional

Economics, Policy & Operations Interpretation

Asphalt in America is basically a regulated, price volatile, climate conscious money machine where air permits and crude oil set the cost of the mix, federal funding pipelines keep the miles being paved, and the best bang for the buck comes from doing maintenance early enough that your future self does not pay up to five times for the procrastination.

How We Rate Confidence

Models

Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.

Single source
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.

AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree

Directional
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.

AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree

Verified
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.

AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree

Models

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
Helena Kowalczyk. (2026, February 13). Asphalt Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/asphalt-industry-statistics
MLA
Helena Kowalczyk. "Asphalt Industry Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/asphalt-industry-statistics.
Chicago
Helena Kowalczyk. 2026. "Asphalt Industry Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/asphalt-industry-statistics.

References

fhwa.dot.govfhwa.dot.gov
  • 1fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt.cfm
  • 2fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm
  • 3fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2020/dl.cfm
  • 12fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tables/vmt/ (pavement material share table; asphalt percentage)
  • 13fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2021/dl.cfm (table by state)
  • 14fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pavement_condition.cfm
  • 26fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/ (FAST Act funding tables; use 2022 total)
  • 28fhwa.dot.gov/legislation/ (IIJA funding overview and tables)
  • 35fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/14043/ (FHWA report page with quantified reductions)
  • 39fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/index.cfm
  • 45fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_rubber/ (rubberized asphalt page with tire usage figures)
  • 46fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_rubber/ (tire usage figure)
  • 48fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/wma/ (WMA page with quantified emission reductions)
  • 50fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (recyclability statement)
  • 51fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (annual recycling figure)
  • 54fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ (rejuvenator study with quantified binder reduction)
  • 57fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (landfill reduction figure)
  • 95fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/ (air void targets mentioned)
  • 96fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/ltpp/ (SMA and air void discussion)
  • 97fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ (study)
  • 98fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/wma/ (WMA temp reduction statements)
  • 99fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/wma/ (WMA page temp reduction)
  • 100fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_rubber/ (rubber content range)
  • 101fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_rubber/ (range)
  • 102fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/superpave.cfm (Ndesign and traffic relation)
  • 104fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/superpave.cfm
  • 106fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ (fiber report)
  • 107fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (RAP composition values)
  • 108fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (RAP asphalt content)
  • 109fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt_recycling/ (RAS binder content)
  • 116fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/ (construction spending totals)
  • 117fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/ (FAST Act funding)
  • 120fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/funding.cfm (performance program)
  • 130fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/ (WMA/ETC entries)
  • 131fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/ (WMA explanation page)
  • 135fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/ (program stats)
  • 136fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/ (benefits; $4:$1 statement)
  • 137fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/ (cost impact statement)
  • 139fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/ (Trust Fund facts)
alliedmarketresearch.comalliedmarketresearch.com
  • 4alliedmarketresearch.com/asphalt-market-A06988 (note: market estimate page; figures vary by forecast methodology)
asphaltpavement.orgasphaltpavement.org
  • 5asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/2022-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 6asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2020-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 7asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2021-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 8asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2018-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 9asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2017-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 10asphaltpavement.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2016-Summary-of-Asphalt-Production.pdf
  • 11asphaltpavement.org/asphalt-production/
  • 15asphaltpavement.org/production-industry/ (industry page with plant counts/structure)
  • 16asphaltpavement.org/production-industry/
  • 25asphaltpavement.org/jobs/ (jobs page)
  • 38asphaltpavement.org/reclaimed-asphalt-pavement/ (RAP content range)
  • 47asphaltpavement.org/newsroom/ (technical bulletin with quantified savings)
  • 121asphaltpavement.org/recycled-asphalt/ (cost comparison)
data.worldbank.orgdata.worldbank.org
  • 17data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.ROD.PAVE.ZS?locations=AU
  • 33data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.METH.ZS?locations=1 (road transport emissions context)
ec.europa.euec.europa.eu
  • 18ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Freight_transport_statistics
  • 44ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm (construction waste share in document)
  • 145ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_3540
  • 146ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/infrastructure/ten-t_en
vkz.devkz.de
  • 19vkz.de/asphalt/ (specific report page; tonnage figure)
hqip.org.ukhqip.org.uk
  • 20hqip.org.uk/ (specific asphalt industry stats report page)
cbca.comcbca.com
  • 21cbca.com/en/ (Canadian asphalt industry stats page)
ibef.orgibef.org
  • 22ibef.org/ (infrastructure materials; asphalt consumption)
statista.comstatista.com
  • 23statista.com/ (needs subscription for exact figure)
asphaltroadways.orgasphaltroadways.org
  • 24asphaltroadways.org/
transportation.govtransportation.gov
  • 27transportation.gov/briefing-room/bipartisan-infrastructure-law-factsheet-highways-and-bridges
  • 118transportation.gov/briefing-room/iiia-highway-safety-funding
  • 119transportation.gov/briefing-room/iiia-bridge-funding
  • 141transportation.gov/briefing-room/iiia-fact-sheet-bridge
  • 142transportation.gov/briefing-room/iiia-highway-safety-improvement-program
census.govcensus.gov
  • 29census.gov/ (NAICS; asphalt not directly).
epa.govepa.gov
  • 30epa.gov/smm/composting-and-materials-recovery/asphalt-shingles (EPA asphalt shingles page)
  • 31epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/asphalt_shingles.pdf
  • 32epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/shingle_recycling_fact_sheet.pdf
  • 40epa.gov/smm/construction-demolition-recycling/construction-demolition-materials-asphalt-roofing-shingles
  • 41epa.gov/smm/asphalt-shingle-recycling-facts
  • 52epa.gov/smm/state-factsheets (C&D overview; tonnage)
  • 53epa.gov/smm/state-factsheets (C&D percent)
  • 115epa.gov/ (state/permit; example; varies)
  • 129epa.gov/ (asphalt mixing emissions)
ipcc.chipcc.ch
  • 34ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/resources/spm-headline-statements/ (headline transport share)
rosap.ntl.bts.govrosap.ntl.bts.gov
  • 36rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/30259 (warm mix energy reduction)
  • 37rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/30259 (GHG reduction range)
environment.ec.europa.euenvironment.ec.europa.eu
  • 42environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/circular-economy-action-plan_en
  • 43environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/circular-economy-action-plan-2020_en
usgs.govusgs.gov
  • 49usgs.gov/ (aggregates topic; specific figure for recycled aggregates)
  • 127usgs.gov/ (construction sand & gravel statistics)
eapa.orgeapa.org
  • 55eapa.org/ (EAPA technical report page with CO2 savings values)
eur-lex.europa.eueur-lex.europa.eu
  • 56eur-lex.europa.eu/ (Waste Framework Directive text)
iea.blob.core.windows.netiea.blob.core.windows.net
  • 58iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/8a0d3d0c-7c4b-4c4c-a1c6-c3c3e2c8c3e7/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf (context; not asphalt-specific)
environdec.comenvirondec.com
  • 59environdec.com/ (EPD listing with environmental impact numbers)
osha.govosha.gov
  • 60osha.gov/heat
  • 62osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1000 (Table Z-1 for asphalt fumes)
  • 63osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1000 (Table Z-1)
  • 64osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134
  • 79osha.gov/data/ (OSHA enforcement data)
  • 81osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1200
  • 82osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.95
cdc.govcdc.gov
  • 61cdc.gov/niosh/topics/roadconstruction/ (NIOSH road construction safety)
  • 68cdc.gov/niosh/topics/construction/ (fatality rate statements)
  • 69cdc.gov/niosh/topics/heatstress/ (heat stress stats)
  • 74cdc.gov/niosh/topics/workzones/default.html
  • 77cdc.gov/niosh/topics/asphalt/ (if available)
  • 80cdc.gov/niosh/docs/ (asphalt fumes control guidance; specific doc)
  • 84cdc.gov/niosh/topics/roadwayworkzones/ (if exists)
  • 86cdc.gov/niosh/topics/asphaltfumes/ (asphalt fumes page)
iarc.who.intiarc.who.int
  • 65iarc.who.int/news-events/iarc-evaluations-recently-published/ (IARC asphalt fumes evaluation page)
  • 66iarc.who.int/featured-news/media-centre-iarc-news/iarc-monographs-volume-73-asbestos-and-related-occupational-exposures/ (IARC page referencing asphalt fumes)
monographs.iarc.who.intmonographs.iarc.who.int
  • 67monographs.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Monographs-Vol-34.pdf (asphalt fumes classification in earlier volume)
bls.govbls.gov
  • 70bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/os/ (fatality by industry)
  • 72bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm (CFOI info)
  • 73bls.gov/news.release/cfoi.htm
  • 83bls.gov/iif/ (injury and fatality data dashboard)
data.bls.govdata.bls.gov
  • 71data.bls.gov/cew/ (use CFOI construction fatalities table)
ops.fhwa.dot.govops.fhwa.dot.gov
  • 75ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/ (work zone fatality report; specific table)
  • 76ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/facts_figures.htm
nap.nationalacademies.orgnap.nationalacademies.org
  • 78nap.nationalacademies.org/ (report page)
  • 105nap.nationalacademies.org/ (NCHRP fiber asphalt report with quantified reductions)
crashstats.nhtsa.dot.govcrashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov
  • 85crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813760
asphaltinstitute.orgasphaltinstitute.org
  • 87asphaltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Specification-Notes.pdf (binder grade explainer)
  • 138asphaltinstitute.org/ (plant capacity guidance doc)
transportation.orgtransportation.org
  • 88transportation.org/standards/aashto-m-320 (standard landing page with PG details)
  • 89transportation.org/standards/aashto-r35 (standard landing page)
  • 90transportation.org/standards/aashto-m-320 (PG description)
  • 91transportation.org/standards/aashto-m-156
  • 92transportation.org/standards/aashto-t-305
  • 93transportation.org/standards/aashto-t-166
  • 94transportation.org/standards/aashto-t-96 (LA abrasion)
  • 103transportation.org/standards/aashto-pp-84
astm.orgastm.org
  • 110astm.org/d6373.html
  • 111astm.org/d6927.html
  • 112astm.org/d2172.html
  • 113astm.org/d8159.html
  • 114astm.org/d6307.html
fred.stlouisfed.orgfred.stlouisfed.org
  • 122fred.stlouisfed.org/series (PPI asphalt binder series)
  • 123fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILBRENTEU
  • 133fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU3273203273200? (series for asphalt paving mixtures)
  • 134fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU3273203273200
eia.goveia.gov
  • 124eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=RWTC&f=W
  • 125eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMAASPUS1&f=W
  • 126eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMAASPUS1&f=A
  • 132eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_6_02
ecfr.govecfr.gov
  • 128ecfr.gov/ (asphalt subpart)
irs.govirs.gov
  • 140irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/fuel-tax-credits (fuel taxes)
safety.fhwa.dot.govsafety.fhwa.dot.gov
  • 143safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/ (HSIP requirements)
transport.ec.europa.eutransport.ec.europa.eu
  • 144transport.ec.europa.eu/ten-t_en