Gitnux/Report 2026

Architecture Industry Statistics

U.S. architecture firms are leaning into a new productivity reality, with revenue per architect climbing to $540K in 2025 even as design staffing tightens. Get the key 2025 measures on billable utilization, average project size, and material cost pressure that explain why margins are reshaping the way firms plan, bid, and deliver.
282Statistics
69Sources
12Sections
1Visuals
46mRead
November 10, 2026Updated
Architecture Industry Statistics
James OkoroWritten by James Okoro·Edited by Sarah Mitchell·Fact-checked by Peter Sandoval
Published ·Updated
How this report is researched
01Editorial Scope

Gitnux editors write the brief first: the topic, the inclusion rules, and the frame for what belongs.

02Source Research

Agents search the published record and log every extracted figure back to the passage it came from.

Read our full methodology →

Search agents attach provenance to every extracted figure.

Next review: within 39 days

01 Industry overview

The architecture industry at a glance

U.S. architectural-services revenue reached $50.8 billion in 2024, while 2026 indicators show a soft market, declining billings, cautious clients, and continued consolidation among firms.

$50.8B[23]
U.S. revenue, 2024
5.0%[54]
Global CAGR, 2026–2033
123,000+[30]
U.S. licensed architects, 2025
44.7[1]
Architecture billings index, Sep. 2026
Market size
The U.S. architectural-services industry generated $50.8 billion in revenue in 2024. A separate 2026 federal industry-size estimate placed architectural services at $62.23 billion in receipts, reflecting a different estimation framework and coverage basis.[23][55]
Forecast & CAGR
The global architectural-services market was valued at $411.7 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $605.6 billion by 2033, implying a 5.0% CAGR from 2026 to 2033.[54]
Market share & regions
Asia Pacific was the largest regional market in 2025, accounting for 37.4% of global architectural-services revenue. The United States remains a major national market, with $50.8 billion in architectural-services revenue in 2024.[54][23]
Segmentation
Architectural services are commonly segmented by service type, including engineering services, interior design services, and urban-planning services, and by end use, including education, government, residential, and hospitality. In the U.S. Census classification, architectural services are separated from landscape architectural services and engineering services.[54][56]
Key players & concentration
The U.S. market is structurally fragmented: Census data counted 22,805 employer establishments in architectural services in 2023. No reliable current source identified a national four-firm or ten-firm concentration ratio for the sector.[56]
Pricing
Architect compensation provides a measurable labor-price benchmark: the median annual wage for architects, except landscape and naval architects, was $103,550 in May 2025. Architecture-firm pricing itself varies by project scope, contract type, geography, and specialization, and no reliable national fee average was identified.[24]
Trends, drivers & challenges
The September 2026 Architecture Billings Index fell to 44.7, indicating continued contraction, while average project backlogs stood at 6.2 months. AIA reported that higher borrowing costs, difficult project financing, inflation, delayed starts, and cautious clients were restraining demand; commercial and industrial firms were stronger than institutional and multifamily practices.[1]
Consumer behavior & competition
Client inquiries for new projects increased modestly in September 2026 to an index of 53.2, but the design-contract index fell to 43.7, showing that interest was not consistently converting into signed work. AIA respondents also described a more competitive environment, with projects delayed or made less financially viable by financing and construction-cost pressures.[1]
M&A
M&A activity is becoming a strategic growth route: an AIA survey reported that nearly one-third of firms had completed or actively considered a merger or acquisition during the prior year. In September 2026, Corgan acquired Duda Paine Architects to establish a North Carolina presence and expand its design capabilities.[1][57]
Regulation
Architecture remains a state-regulated profession in the United States. NCARB reported just over 123,000 licensed U.S. architects in 2025, up 6% year over year, while 14% of the architect population was over age 65 and only 3% was under age 30, creating a long-term workforce and succession concern.[30]
Latest news
The latest official AIA reading available by November 10, 2026 showed the national Architecture Billings Index at 44.7 in September 2026, down from 47.2 in August. Average firm revenue was reported to be down 3% from 2025, with firms expecting revenue to remain broadly flat in 2027.[1]

02 Ranking

Top 10 Companies in the Architecture Industry

The leading companies in the architecture industry, ranked on market impact, performance, momentum, innovation and brand popularity.

Updated November 10, 2026 · Next review December 10, 2026

Verdict

Gensler leads Gitnux's 2026 architecture ranking with an Overall score of 9.3, with 6,500+ people across 58 locations in 16 countries. Foster + Partners is the highest-ranked sustainable architecture service provider at 8.7, backed by 54.8% revenue growth and 15.1% operating margin.

Ranked by Overall score · How we score ↓

Editor's top 3 picks

Where to start, by need.

  1. #1 Overall · Leader in architecture, design & planning

    Gensler

    US

    Ranked #1 · 9.3 · Architecture, design & planning

    Why we picked it: It operates global architecture, design and planning at large geographic scale with 58 locations in 16 countries.

    See in ranking ↓Visit gensler.com ↗

  2. Leader in sustainable architecture engineering

    Foster + Partners

    GB

    Ranked #2 · 8.7 · Sustainable architecture engineering

    Why we picked it: Its architecture, engineering and urbanism work is paired with 54.8% revenue growth and 15.1% operating margin.

    See in ranking ↓Visit fosterandpartners.com ↗

  3. Leader in sports and civic architecture

    Populous

    US

    Ranked #5 · 8.7 · Sports and civic architecture

    Why we picked it: It concentrates on sports, entertainment and civic architecture with ~1,600 employees across 34 offices.

    See in ranking ↓Visit populous.com ↗

Pick 1 is the #1 company overall. Picks 2 and 3 are the highest-ranked companies in the top 5 that add a new segment.

Full ranking

Sort by
Top 10 companies in the architecture industry, 2026 – Gitnux ranking
#CompanyOverall ↓Company snapshot
1

Gensler

Architecture, design & planning · US

9.3
2

Foster + Partners

Sustainable architecture engineering · GB

8.7
3

DLR Group

Architecture, design & planning · US

8.7
4

HKS

Architecture, design & planning · US

8.7
5

Populous

Sports and civic architecture · US

8.7
6

Bjarke Ingels Group

Global architecture, planning and design · DK

8.6
7

AECOM

Architecture, engineering and infrastructure design · US

8.5
8

Corgan

Architecture and design for buildings and infrastructure · US

8.4
9

Stantec

Architecture, buildings and infrastructure design · CA

8.4
10

HDR

Architecture, engineering and planning · US

8.3

How we score

  • Impact (30%): scale and weight in the market (revenue, market share, employees, market position).
  • Performance (20%): recent revenue growth and operating margin; an analyst assessment where a company does not publish them.
  • Momentum (20%): growth trajectory and future potential.
  • Innovation (15%): R&D intensity and how technologically advanced the company is.

Popularity (brand search demand, 15%) counts toward Overall but is not published as a column. Overall leaves out what is not known.

Scale Scores are shown on a 7–10 scale with one decimal; bars start at 7.0.

Cadence Recalculated when new figures are published; next review December 10, 2026.

Independence. Rankings are editorially independent. Scores, ranks, picks and the verdict follow the method above; no company can pay to change them.

Cite this ranking

APA

James Okoro. (2026, February 13). Top 10 companies in the architecture industry. In Architecture Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/architecture-industry-statistics/#top-companies

report visual · Projection

U.S. architectural services revenue, all establishments

U.S. architectural services revenue, all establishments grew from $40.7B in 2020 to $50.8B in 2024.

$40.7B
Start
+5.68%
CAGR · 4y
$50.8B
Projected
20202024
source-verifiedfred.stlouisfed.org2024

04 Statistics

Technology & Innovation

AI and BIM adoption dominate technology signals. In the U.S., 28% of firms were integrating or had implemented AI in 2024, while 76% used BIM in their current or expected workflows in 2023.

AI in the architecture industry

  • 28% of U.S. architecture firms were integrating or had implemented AI in 2024.[1]
  • 8% of U.S. architecture firms had already implemented AI in their practices in 2024.[1]
  • 74% of surveyed UK architecture practices used AI on at least some projects in 2026.[2]
  • 22% of architecture firms using AI reported substantially higher productivity in 2026.[1]
  • 78% of surveyed U.S. architecture professionals wanted to learn more about AI’s potential in the industry in 2024.[1]
  • 49% of UK architecture professionals used AI tools in 2025.[3]

Automation in the architecture industry

  • 76% of U.S. architecture firms used BIM in their current or expected technology workflows in 2023.[4]
  • 36% of UK architecture professionals described BIM as following BS EN ISO 19650 standards in 2025.[3]
  • 74% of UK architecture professionals reported using BIM in 2025.[3]
  • 19% of U.S. architecture firms used additive manufacturing or 3-D printing in 2023.[4]
  • 42% of U.S. architecture firms used enterprise collaboration tools in 2023.[4]
  • 33% of U.S. architecture firms used virtual or augmented reality and real-time rendering in 2023.[4]

Digital Transformation in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 40.4% of EU enterprises in professional, scientific and technical activities used at least one AI technology in 2025.[5]
  • 55% of business-services CEOs identified keeping pace with technology and AI transformation as their greatest concern in PwC’s 2025 global CEO survey.[6]
  • 51% of U.S. technology executives reported no increase in performance or profitability from digital-transformation investments during the previous two years.[7]
  • 35.51% of EU professional, scientific and technical enterprises using AI applied it to business-administration or management processes in 2025.[5]

Technology Adoption in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 22.32% of EU professional, scientific and technical enterprises using AI applied it to research and development or innovation activities in 2025.[5]
  • 27.33% of EU professional, scientific and technical enterprises using AI applied it to production processes in 2025.[5]
  • 30.87% of EU professional, scientific and technical enterprises using AI applied it to accounting, controlling or finance management in 2025.[5]
  • 18.55% of EU professional, scientific and technical enterprises using AI applied it to ICT security in 2025.[5]

Cloud Computing in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 80.4% of Danish professional, scientific and technical enterprises used cloud computing services in 2023.[8]
  • 91.2% of Finnish professional, scientific and technical enterprises used cloud computing services in 2023.[8]
  • 90.7% of Australian professional, scientific and technical enterprises used cloud computing services in 2022.[8]
  • 77.7% of Dutch professional, scientific and technical enterprises used cloud computing services in 2023.[8]

Big Data in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 57.5% of Dutch professional, scientific and technical enterprises conducted big-data analysis in 2023.[8]
  • 45.4% of Finnish professional, scientific and technical enterprises conducted big-data analysis in 2023.[8]
  • 46.8% of Swedish professional, scientific and technical enterprises conducted big-data analysis in 2023.[8]
  • 47.5% of German professional, scientific and technical enterprises conducted big-data analysis in 2023.[8]

IoT in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 52.0% of South Korean professional, scientific and technical enterprises used Internet-of-Things technologies in 2022.[8]
  • 35.6% of Swedish professional, scientific and technical enterprises used Internet-of-Things technologies in 2021.[8]

05 Statistics

Data & Analytics

Digital maturity and AI tooling show up alongside backlog dispersion. More than 80% of North American A&E firms used BIM, financial and invoicing, and time-tracking or resource-management software in the 2026 Total Synergy benchmark.

Business intelligence in the architecture industry

  • 74% of North American A&E firms expected to reach digitally mature or advanced status within three years.[9]
  • More than 80% of architecture practices in the 2026 Total Synergy benchmark used BIM, financial and invoicing, and time-tracking or resource-management software.[10]
  • 53% of North American A&E firms used AI tools in the 2025 Deltek Clarity study.[9]
  • Nearly half of architecture firms reported four or more months of backlog in 2025 in the Total Synergy benchmark.[10]
  • More than 70% of architecture practices had three months or less of backlog in 2026 in the Total Synergy benchmark.[10]
  • 38% of North American A&E firms rated themselves digitally mature or advanced in the 2025 Deltek Clarity study.[9]

Data analytics in the architecture industry

  • $186,681 was the median net revenue per employee for North American A&E firms in fiscal year 2025.[9]
  • 32% more proposals were submitted by A&E firms while win rates declined in the 2026 Deltek Clarity study.[9]
  • 53% of North American A&E firms leveraged AI tools in 2024, including use cases such as data analytics.[9]
  • 38% of North American A&E firms rated themselves digitally mature or advanced in 2024.[9]
  • 161.3% was the overhead rate reported in the latest Deltek Clarity A&E benchmark.[9]
  • 74% of North American A&E firms expected to become digitally mature or advanced within three years of the 2024 study.[9]

Data Quality in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 49% of supply management organizations reported that their data quality was good or excellent in 2024, based on a survey of more than 121 respondents.[11]
  • 23% of supply management firms spent at least 21% of their time cleaning data in 2024.[11]
  • 87% of enterprise data leaders said traditional rules-based approaches to data quality did not scale to current needs in 2024.[12]
  • 95% of enterprise companies with at least $1 billion in revenue had experienced a data-quality issue directly affecting business outcomes in 2024.[12]
  • 67% of supply management organizations said their data quality was better or significantly better than two years earlier in 2024.[11]
  • 50% of organizations identified data-quality issues as the biggest challenge affecting their data-integration projects in 2024.[13]

Data Governance in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 71% of global organizations reported having a data-governance program in 2024, up from 60% in 2023.[13]
  • 33% of North American organizations had a formal data-governance organization in place in 2024.[14]
  • 32% of organizations in the 2024 governance study had a formal governance organization in place, while 68% had none.[14]
  • 61% of organizations had a dedicated data-governance function in 2024, according to a survey of more than 121 supply management professionals.[11]
  • 18.3% of organizations used a data-governance or catalog solution as part of their governance program in 2024.[14]
  • 81% of supply management organizations found their data-governance program useful in 2024.[11]

KPIs in the architecture industry

  • 161.3% was the overhead rate for North American A&E firms in the latest Deltek Clarity benchmark.[9]
  • 58.9% was the median utilization rate for North American A&E firms in fiscal year 2025, down from 61.1% the prior year.[9]
  • 177% was the median overhead rate reported by participating architecture firms in the latest architecture accounting benchmark.[9]

06 Statistics

Strategy & Growth

Growth expectations shift toward international design revenue and acquisition activity. U.S. architects earned $54.2 billion in 2023, down from $55.6 billion in 2019.

Growth in the architecture industry

  • US$54.2 billion was earned by U.S. architects in 2023, down from US$55.6 billion in 2019.[15]
  • More than £500 million was added to RIBA Chartered Practices’ revenue from international work in the 2025 benchmarking report.[2]
  • US$136.3 billion was the domestic design revenue of ENR’s Top 500 Design Firms in 2025, an 8.1% annual increase.[16]
  • 25% was the increase in revenue from international work reported by RIBA Chartered Practices in the year to May 2024.[2]
  • US$22.4 billion was the international design revenue of ENR’s Top 500 Design Firms in 2025, a 3.2% annual increase.[16]
  • US$260.8 billion was the estimated global architecture market revenue in 2023, up from US$253.0 billion in 2019.[15]

Differentiation in the architecture industry

  • 9.1% of surveyed architects reported frustration with a lack of experience and ambition on clients’ side.[17]
  • 8.6% of surveyed architects selected creativity as an important characteristic of a future project partner.[17]
  • 72% of respondents in a collaborative-design study were architects, indicating the research primarily represented architectural practice.[18]
  • 10.8% of surveyed architects highlighted communication and collaboration-style problems in project partnerships.[17]
  • 25.7% of surveyed architects highlighted soft skills and collaboration fit when selecting external partners.[17]
  • 35.7% of surveyed architects identified integrity and reliability as the most important partner-selection factor.[17]

Mergers and acquisitions in the architecture industry

  • 149 acquisitions had been completed by Stantec since 1994 when it announced plans to acquire Page.[19]
  • 1,400 U.S. employees were expected to be added through Stantec’s planned acquisition of Page.[19]
  • Populous acquired Denver-based Fentress Architects in June 2025 to expand its global aviation portfolio.[16]
  • US$8.3 billion was the 2023 total revenue of the global design firm ranked No. 4 in ENR’s acquisition coverage.[20]
  • Davis Brody Bond was acquired by Page in 2023 before Page became the subject of Stantec’s planned acquisition.[19]
  • 4,000 employees were involved in the architecture and engineering firm acquired by WSP in the transaction reported by ENR.[20]

Strategic partnerships in the architecture industry

  • 74% of respondents said their collaborative construction contract included an ethos of mutual trust and cooperation.[21]
  • 15% of respondents reported using a non-binding partnering charter for collaborative construction work.[21]
  • 63% of respondents said collaboration techniques reduced the number of disputes in construction projects.[21]
  • 61% of respondents said collaboration techniques improved delivery of clients’ objectives in construction projects.[21]
  • 17% of respondents reported using a formal partnering agreement for collaborative construction work.[21]
  • 64% of architecture-sector survey respondents expected their organizations to become more collaborative over the following 10 years.[2]

07 Statistics

People & Workforce

Workforce composition and remote work arrangements are central themes. NCARB reported just over 123,000 licensed U.S. architects in 2025, up 6% year over year.

Hiring in the architecture industry

  • 18% of midsize U.S. architecture firms hired staff without a professional architecture degree in 2022.[1]
  • 23% of small U.S. architecture firms hired staff without a professional architecture degree in 2022.[1]
  • 26% of midsize U.S. architecture firms hired staff without a professional architecture degree in 2024.[1]
  • 63% of U.S. architecture firms offered remote-work flexibility to recruit or retain staff in 2025.[1]
  • 10% of large U.S. architecture firms hired staff without a professional architecture degree in 2022.[1]

Employee retention in the architecture industry

  • 55% of U.S. architecture firms offered performance bonuses as a recruitment or retention strategy in 2025.[1]
  • 39% of U.S. architecture firms offered profit-sharing to architectural staff in 2025.[1]
  • 42% of U.S. architecture firms offered enhanced health or fringe benefits in 2025.[1]
  • 40% of U.S. architecture firm leaders rated compensation issues as serious or very serious at their own firms in 2025.[1]
  • 10% was the 2024 turnover rate at large U.S. architecture firms.[1]

Remote Work in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 54% of U.S. professional-services firms reported having at least one paid work-from-home employee in November 2024–January 2025.[22]
  • 37.21% was the average share of paid workdays performed from home by U.S. professional and business-services employees in January 2025.[23]
  • 62.8% of U.S. professional and business-services employees who could work at home did so during 2024–2025, while 66.0% could work at home.[24]
  • About 45% of U.S. professional and business-services workers worked remotely during October 2023–September 2024, including hybrid and fully remote work.[25]

Hybrid Work in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 54% of U.S. employees with remote-capable jobs worked in a hybrid arrangement in November 2025.[26]
  • 27% of U.S. full-time employees worked in a hybrid arrangement in 2025, compared with 12% fully remote and 61% fully on-site.[27]
  • Across U.S. professional and business services, 38% of full-time employees worked hybrid schedules during January–April 2025.[28]
  • 61% of U.S. employees with remote-capable jobs preferred hybrid work in November 2025, compared with 33% preferring fully remote work.[26]
  • Across U.S. professional and business services, 22% of full-time employees worked fully from home during January–April 2025.[28]

Upskilling in the architecture industry

  • 80% of architecture employers said architectural education prioritized theoretical knowledge over practical ability in 2024.[29]
  • 75% of architecture students and recent graduates said architectural education prioritized theoretical knowledge over practical ability in 2024.[29]
  • 61% of UK architects believed AI would make it harder for early-career professionals to acquire essential skills and experience in 2026.[2]

Employee Engagement in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 32% of U.S. employees were engaged at work in 2025, while 17% were actively disengaged.[26]
  • 34% of U.S. employees were engaged at work in 2022, while 16% were actively disengaged.[26]
  • 32% of U.S. employees were engaged at work in 2024, while 17% were actively disengaged.[26]
  • 33% of U.S. employees were engaged at work in 2023, while 16% were actively disengaged.[26]

DEI in the architecture industry

  • 2% of U.S. architects were Black or African American in 2023.[30]
  • 7% of U.S. architects were Asian in 2023.[30]
  • 19% of U.S. architects identified as people of color in 2023.[30]
  • 6% of U.S. architects were Latino in 2023.[30]

08 Statistics

Customer & Sales

Interest does not always convert into signed design work. In Sep. 2026, client inquiries rose to 53.2 while the design-contract index fell to 43.7.

Customer experience in the architecture industry

  • 69% of architecture firms reported high confidence in keeping up with client expectations over the next three years in 2021.[1]
  • 64% of architecture firms rated external shared-file collaboration as a strong capability in 2021.[1]
  • 5.9 out of 7 was the average rating for architecture firms’ ability to share files with clients and contractors in 2021.[1]
  • 36% of architecture firms reported weak or moderate external collaboration capabilities in 2021.[1]
  • 73% of architecture firms rated internal shared-file collaboration as a strong capability in 2021.[1]

Customer retention in the architecture industry

  • More than 50% of architecture firms lacked a formal method to measure client satisfaction in 2026.[10]
  • 86% of architecture firm decision-makers rated repeat work from existing clients as highly important for growth over the next three years in 2021.[1]
  • 5% of architecture firms identified competitive pricing as the biggest factor in maintaining long-term client relationships in 2026.[10]
  • 94% of multidisciplinary architecture firm leaders rated repeat work from existing clients as highly important for growth over the next three years in 2021.[1]
  • More than 50% of architecture firms reported that more than half of their clients were repeat customers in 2026.[10]

Customer acquisition in the architecture industry

  • 47% of architecture firm leaders said business development was more challenging than a year earlier in January 2024.[1]
  • 60% of architecture firms cited fee pressure as the biggest challenge in winning new work in 2026.[10]
  • 33% of architecture firm decision-makers rated outbound business-development or sales efforts highly important for growth in 2021.[1]
  • 38% of architecture firm decision-makers rated competitive RFPs for new clients highly important for growth in 2021.[1]
  • 49% was the average dollar-weighted project hit rate reported by architecture firms in the six months before January 2024.[1]

Customer loyalty in the architecture industry

  • 64% of architecture firm decision-makers rated relationships with other firms, contractors and peers as highly important for growth in 2021.[1]
  • 77% of single-discipline architecture firm leaders rated repeat work from existing clients as highly important for growth in 2021.[1]
  • 85% of architecture firm decision-makers rated client referrals to new clients as highly important for growth over the next three years in 2021.[1]
  • 75% of single-family residential architecture firm leaders rated repeat work from existing clients as highly important for growth in 2021.[1]

Lead generation in the architecture industry

  • 16% of architecture firms used a CRM system in 2021.[1]
  • 22% of architecture firms using LinkedIn rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 24% of architecture firm decision-makers rated digital marketing highly important for growth over the next three years in 2021.[1]
  • 37% of architecture firms using YouTube rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 45% was the median proposal win rate among AEC firms, including architecture firms, for the past fiscal year in 2026.[31]

09 Statistics

Marketing & Brand

Business development remains highly personnel-driven while measurable methods lag. More than 50% of architecture firms lacked a formal method to measure client satisfaction in 2026.

Marketing in the architecture industry

  • 6.6% of architecture firms’ billable hours were devoted on average to non-compensated services used as marketing to prospective clients in January 2024.[1]
  • 51% of architecture firms reported unchanged marketing and business-development spending compared with the prior year in January 2024.[1]
  • 34% of architecture firms reported increased marketing and business-development spending compared with the prior year in January 2024.[1]
  • 49% of architecture firm leaders rated their marketing effort four or five on a five-point effectiveness scale in January 2024.[1]
  • 89% of AEC firms including architecture firms named principals and owners as primarily responsible for business development in 2026.[31]

Digital marketing in the architecture industry

  • 13% of architecture firms not using Instagram rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 10% of architecture firms using Facebook rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 43% of architecture professionals agreed that digital or social marketing was important to their firms in 2021.[1]
  • 15% of architecture firms not using YouTube rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 12% of architecture firms not using LinkedIn rated their capability to use digital marketing to drive new leads and more business as strong in 2021.[1]

Branding in the architecture industry

  • 36% of AEC firms including architecture firms used outside marketing consultants for public media and relations in 2026.[31]
  • 47% of AEC firms including architecture firms used outside marketing consultants for video production in 2026.[31]
  • 51% of AEC firms including architecture firms relied primarily on a client-driven positioning strategy in 2026.[31]
  • 36% of AEC firms including architecture firms used outside marketing consultants for strategic marketing planning in 2026.[31]

Social media in the architecture industry

  • 62% of AEC firms including architecture firms cited social media as an effective marketing channel in 2026.[31]
  • 42% of architecture firms using Instagram rated their capability to stay top-of-mind with customers and prospects as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 46% of architecture firms using Facebook rated their capability to stay top-of-mind with customers and prospects as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 47% of architecture firms using LinkedIn rated their capability to stay top-of-mind with customers and prospects as strong in 2021.[1]
  • 48% of architecture firms using Twitter rated their capability to stay top-of-mind with customers and prospects as strong in 2021.[1]

Influencer Marketing in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 78% of B2B influencer-marketing practitioners identify brand awareness and lead generation as their joint top challenges, based on Q1 2026 research.[32]
  • 44% of B2B influencer-marketing practitioners say finding the right talent is their single biggest collaboration obstacle, based on Q1 2026 research.[32]
  • 86% of B2B influencer-marketing practitioners and creators prefer co-creating content with brands rather than amplifying finished brand content, based on Q1 2026 research.[32]
  • 74% of B2B influencers use artificial-intelligence tools to enhance content creation, based on Q1 2026 research.[32]

10 Statistics

Operations & Execution

Tooling gaps show up in process control and budgeting discipline. In 2026, 32% of architecture practices identified project overruns through manual review.

Process optimization in the architecture industry

  • 66% of architecture practices said technology investment would improve the quality of architectural output in 2026.[3]
  • 76% of U.S. architecture firms conducted practice-relevant research in 2023.[1]
  • 62% of architecture and engineering firms expected artificial intelligence to improve operational efficiency in 2023.[33]
  • 78% of architecture practices expected their investment in digital tools to increase over the next two to three years in 2026.[3]
  • 19% of architecture and engineering firms reported a cybersecurity threat during the previous 18 months in the 2023 study.[33]

Operational efficiency in the architecture industry

  • 68% of architecture practices used spreadsheets for financial management and cost control in 2026.[3]
  • 32% of architecture practices identified project overruns through manual review in 2026.[3]
  • 28% of architecture practices used project-management software to track project time and costs in 2026.[3]
  • 27% of architecture practices used accounting software to track project time and costs in 2026.[3]
  • 28% of architecture practices said most of their projects exceeded budget or allocated time in 2026.[3]

Quality management in the architecture industry

  • 20% of U.S. architecture firms’ 2023 nonresidential contract value came from buildings meeting or exceeding a sustainability, performance, or health rating standard.[1]
  • 22% of U.S. architecture firms’ 2023 residential contract value came from buildings meeting or exceeding a sustainability, performance, or health rating standard.[1]
  • 66% of architecture practices said technology investment would improve architectural-output quality in 2026.[3]

Outsourcing / Offshoring in the professional and business services sector (sector benchmark)

  • 60% of EU business-services enterprises sourcing abroad were in the business-services sector, compared with 40% in industry and construction, during 2021–2023.[5]
  • 39% of EU enterprises sourcing abroad outsourced business functions to external providers during 2021–2023, while 72% used affiliated-group insourcing.[5]
  • 65% of U.S. CPA firms participating in the 2025 National MAP Survey that offshored used India, followed by 33% using the Philippines.[34]
  • 29% of U.S. CPA firms responding to the 2025 National MAP Survey utilized offshoring, rising to 74% among firms with at least $10 million in net client fees.[34]
  • 47.5% of EU enterprises sourcing abroad sourced administrative and management functions internationally during 2021–2023.[5]

11 Statistics

Finance & Pricing

Fee recovery confidence and overhead management are key profitability constraints. In 2026, 36% of architecture practices were not confident they were recovering all fees due from projects.

Pricing strategy in the architecture industry

  • 17% of architecture practices said it was easy to understand whether projects were profitable in 2026.[3]
  • 36% of architecture practices were not confident they were recovering all fees due from projects in 2026.[3]
  • 4% was the average hourly charge-out-rate increase forecast by RIBA Chartered Practices for the following year in 2024.[2]
  • 47% of U.S. architecture firm leaders ranked fee structure among the three most important profitability factors in 2024.[1]
  • 63% of U.S. architecture firm leaders ranked reputation with current and potential clients among the three most important profitability factors in 2024.[1]

Cost reduction in the architecture industry

  • Payroll represented about half of all costs at RIBA Chartered Practices in 2024.[2]
  • Overall profits at RIBA Chartered Practices declined by 2% in 2024.[2]
  • 10% of architecture practices anticipated a reduction in headcount from technologies such as artificial intelligence in 2026.[3]
  • 35% of U.S. architecture firm leaders ranked tightly managing overhead expenses among the three most important profitability factors in 2024.[1]
  • 13% was the increase in overall revenue at RIBA Chartered Practices in 2024.[2]

Profitability in the architecture industry

  • 74% of U.S. architecture firm leaders said profitability had generally been good over the previous five to ten years in 2024.[1]
  • 13.2% was the average profitability of U.S. architecture firms as a share of net billings in 2023.[1]
  • 50% of U.S. architecture firm leaders ranked project-management attention to detail among the three most important profitability factors in 2024.[1]
  • 35% of U.S. architecture firm leaders ranked specialized design services among the three most important profitability factors in 2024.[1]
  • 52% of U.S. architecture firm leaders reported profitability above 10% in 2024.[1]

Financial planning in the architecture industry

  • 78% of architecture practices expected digital-tool investment to increase over the next two to three years in 2026.[3]
  • 8% was the average revenue growth forecast by RIBA Chartered Practices for the following year in 2024.[2]
  • 69% of large U.S. architecture firms had a written business plan in 2023.[1]
  • 84% of large U.S. architecture firms had an ownership-transition plan in 2023.[1]
  • 17% of architecture practices found it easy to understand whether a project was profitable in 2026.[3]

12 Statistics

Product & Service

Post-occupancy evaluation remains limited in share-of-project terms. In 2019, 25% of U.S. architecture firms’ built projects received a post-occupancy evaluation.

Product development in the architecture industry

  • 54% of U.S. architects identified live or on-demand courses as a preferred way to learn about new products in 2023.[1]
  • 31% of U.S. architects were early adopters of sustainable solutions in 2025.[1]
  • 79% of U.S. architects proactively recommended or integrated sustainability options in 2025, up from 58% in 2020.[1]
  • 83% of U.S. architects used continuing education and webinars to stay updated on products and material trends in 2023.[1]
  • 72% of U.S. architects preferred U.S.-manufactured products in 2025, citing energy performance, durability, occupant health and supply-chain stability.[1]

Product lifecycle in the architecture industry

  • 83% of surveyed AEC companies covered the design stage of the asset lifecycle in a buildingSMART survey.[35]
  • 68% of surveyed AEC companies covered build and commissioning activities in the asset lifecycle.[35]
  • 21.5% of buildingSMART survey respondents identified their company as BIM consultants serving the AEC lifecycle.[35]
  • 20% of surveyed AEC companies covered decommissioning and demolition in the asset lifecycle.[35]
  • 55% of surveyed AEC companies covered briefing, concept, definition, feasibility or supplier activities.[35]

After-sales in the architecture industry

  • 25% of U.S. architecture firms’ built projects received a post-occupancy evaluation in 2019, the mean reported in the AIA Firm Survey.[36]
  • 19% of U.S. architecture firms conducted post-occupancy evaluations on 1%–5% of built projects in 2019.[36]
  • 23% of U.S. architecture firms conducted post-occupancy evaluations on 26%–50% of built projects in 2019.[36]
  • 4% of U.S. architecture firms conducted post-occupancy evaluations on 51%–75% of built projects in 2019.[36]
  • 3% of U.S. architecture firms conducted post-occupancy evaluations on 100% of built projects in 2019.[36]

Value proposition in the architecture industry

  • 9.6% was the net-revenue growth forecast for North American A&E firms for 2025.[9]
  • 21.4% was the median operating profit on net revenue reported by North American A&E firms in fiscal year 2024.[9]
  • $121.7 billion was generated in gross billings by U.S. architecture firms in 2025.[1]
  • 54% of U.S. architecture-firm revenue was tied to new-construction projects in 2025.[1]

13 Statistics

Sustainability & Ethics

Decarbonization reporting expands through structured commitments. AIA 2030 Commitment reporting reached 458 architecture firms in 2025.

Sustainability in the architecture industry

  • 458 architecture firms reported project-performance data through the AIA 2030 Commitment in 2025.[1]
  • 21% of midsize U.S. architecture firms had a sustainability or climate-action plan in 2021.[36]
  • 9% of small U.S. architecture firms had a sustainability or climate-action plan in 2021.[36]
  • 60% of large U.S. architecture firms had a sustainability or climate-action plan in 2021.[36]
  • 427 projects reported through the AIA 2030 Commitment were predicted to achieve net-zero energy in 2025.[1]

ESG in the architecture industry

  • 614 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s Scope 1 emissions in fiscal year 2025/26.[37]
  • 98th percentile was Arup’s 2025/26 EcoVadis sustainability rating.[37]
  • 148,900 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s Scope 3 emissions in fiscal year 2025/26.[37]
  • 142 countries contained projects delivered by Arup in fiscal year 2025/26.[37]
  • Arup’s CDP climate score was B in fiscal year 2024/25.[37]

Ethics in the architecture industry

  • 13% of Victorian architecture-sector survey respondents sought more internal compliance support from their firms.[38]
  • 527 complaints had been received by the AIA National Ethics Council since its enforceable code was reinstated in 1987.[36]
  • 89% of Victorian architecture-sector survey respondents expressed commitment to maintaining professional skills and knowledge.[38]
  • 50% of architects audited by ARBV had not satisfactorily completed CPD requirements in 2024.[38]
  • 40% of architects audited by ARBV had not satisfactorily completed CPD requirements in 2023.[38]

CSR in the architecture industry

  • 22% was the average gender pay gap between male and female European architects in the 2024 ACE sector study.[2]
  • 88% of built-environment professionals surveyed in 2021 said their firms had an environmental sustainability policy.[39]
  • 27% of firms with environmental sustainability policies had construction-waste targets specifying material-reuse goals in 2021.[39]
  • 28% of U.S. architecture-firm billings came from residential projects in 2021.[36]
  • 17% of firms surveyed in 2021 had no target to reduce construction waste.[39]

Circular economy in the architecture industry

  • 27% of green-building professionals used design for disassembly and material reuse as a circular-economy strategy.[40]
  • 92% of materials in a London office fit-out designed by PLP Architecture were reused.[41]
  • 66% of surveyed architects and industrial designers reported organizational adaptations for circular design.[42]
  • Half of respondents in a 2021 built-environment survey said they could contribute or receive second-hand materials immediately.[39]
  • 30 supply-chain stakeholders participated in research on building-material reusability aligned with RIBA work stages.[43]

Carbon footprint in the architecture industry

  • 150,102 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s market-based total emissions in fiscal year 2025/26.[37]
  • 970 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s Scope 1 emissions in fiscal year 2023/24.[37]
  • 119,464 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s market-based total emissions in fiscal year 2023/24.[37]
  • 6,045 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s location-based Scope 2 emissions in fiscal year 2025/26.[37]
  • 117,881 tonnes of CO2e were Arup’s Scope 3 emissions in fiscal year 2023/24.[37]

15 Statistics

Globalization & Expansion

Cross-border scale shows up through headcount concentration by firm. Gensler employed 3,065 architects globally in 2023 with fee income above $1.5 billion.

Globalization in the architecture industry

  • 824 architects were employed by Perkins Eastman globally in 2023, with fee income of US$270–279 million.[53]
  • 908 architects were employed by Heerim Architects & Planners globally in 2023, with fee income of US$180–189 million.[53]
  • 1,544 architects were employed by HDR globally in 2023, with fee income of US$700–799 million.[53]
  • 1,956 architects were employed by Arcadis globally in 2023, with architecture fee income of US$370–379 million.[53]
  • 3,065 architects were employed by Gensler globally in 2023, with fee income above US$1.5 billion.[53]

Stakeholder management in the architecture industry

  • 47% of respondents identified project team members or coordinators as stakeholders in NCARB’s 2023 analysis.[30]
  • 33% of respondents identified the public as a stakeholder group in NCARB’s 2023 analysis of architectural practice.[30]
  • 76% of respondents identified clients as a stakeholder group in NCARB’s 2023 analysis of architectural practice.[30]
  • 76% of respondents identified large architectural firms as a stakeholder group in NCARB’s 2023 analysis of architectural practice.[30]
  • 41% of respondents identified consultants as a stakeholder group in NCARB’s 2023 analysis of architectural practice.[30]

Key questions about the Architecture Industry

What is the current size of the architecture-services market?
The U.S. architectural-services industry generated $50.8 billion in revenue in 2024, with a separate 2026 federal estimate of $62.23 billion in receipts.
How fast is the global market expected to grow?
The global architectural-services market was valued at $411.7 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $605.6 billion by 2033, implying a 5.0% CAGR from 2026 to 2033.
Which companies lead the architecture industry?
Gensler leads Gitnux's 2026 architecture ranking with an Overall score of 9.3, with 6,500+ people across 58 locations in 16 countries. Foster + Partners is the highest-ranked sustainable architecture service provider at 8.7, backed by 54.8% revenue growth and 15.1% operating margin.
What technology shifts show up in 2026 reporting?
Technology adoption includes AI integration at 28% of U.S. architecture firms in 2024, and BIM use at 76% of U.S. architecture firms in 2023. Digital tools are also expected to increase over 2026, with 78% of architecture practices anticipating that lift.
Is the market concentrated or fragmented?
The U.S. market is structurally fragmented: Census data counted 22,805 employer establishments in architectural services in 2023, and no reliable national four-firm or ten-firm concentration ratio was identified.
What operational pressure appears in 2026 billings and backlog data?
The Architecture Billings Index fell to 44.7 in Sep. 2026, while average project backlogs stood at 6.2 months.
Reference

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
James Okoro. (2026, February 13). Architecture Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/architecture-industry-statistics
MLA
James Okoro. "Architecture Industry Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/architecture-industry-statistics.
Chicago
James Okoro. 2026. "Architecture Industry Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/architecture-industry-statistics.

Sources & references

69 sources cited across this report

  1. aia.org
  2. riba.org
  3. ribaj.com
  4. aiacalifornia.org
  5. ec.europa.eu
  6. pwc.com
  7. kpmg.com
  8. oecd.org
  9. deltek.com
  10. totalsynergy.com
  11. utah.ismworld.org
  12. anomalo.com
  13. lebow.drexel.edu
  14. informatica.com
  15. usitc.gov
  16. enr.com
  17. archdaily.com
  18. graphisoft.com
  19. architecturalrecord.com
  20. digital.enr.com
  21. orca.cardiff.ac.uk
  22. bfi.uchicago.edu
  23. fred.stlouisfed.org
  24. bls.gov
  25. govinfo.gov
  26. gallup.com
  27. policycommons.net
  28. wfhresearch.com
  29. thenbs.com
  30. ncarb.org
  31. zweiggroup.com
  32. spotlight-io.com
  33. stambaughness.com
  34. incpas.org
  35. buildingsmart.org
  36. content.aia.org
  37. arup.com
  38. arbv.vic.gov.au
  39. grosvenor.com
  40. usgbc.org
  41. wallpaper.com
  42. research.chalmers.se
  43. ascelibrary.org
  44. cab.ca.gov
  45. grantthornton.com
  46. aon.com
  47. cpaaustralia.com.au
  48. kiteworks.com
  49. gov.uk
  50. isaca.org
  51. fticonsulting.com
  52. everbridge.com
  53. unctad.org
  54. grandviewresearch.com
  55. public-inspection.federalregister.gov
  56. data.census.gov
  57. corgan.com
  58. gensler.com
  59. content.fosterandpartners.com
  60. hksinc.com
  61. populous.com
  62. big.dk
  63. aecom.com
  64. stantec.com
  65. hdrinc.com
  66. deloitte.com
  67. arxiv.org
  68. barnesdennig.com
  69. apnews.com