Race In College Admissions Statistics: Market Report & Data

Table of Contents

In the context of understanding equity and diversity in higher education, analyzing Race in College Admissions Statistics can yield insightful revelations. This blog post delves into a comprehensive analysis of how race influences college admissions decisions. We scrutinize the statistical data to ascertain the trends, disparities and potential biases present in admissions across diverse educational institutions. Enlightening for administrators, educators, students, and their families alike, understanding the dynamics of race can promote a more balanced and socially aware approach towards the future of college admissions.

The Latest Race In College Admissions Statistics Unveiled

70% of white students admitted to colleges and universities were admitted purely based on academic capabilities, while 65%, 55%, and 50% of Latinos, African-Americans, and Native Americans respectively were admitted on the same grounds.

In the exploration of race in college admissions statistics, the stated figures infuse an intriguing aspect, pinpointing a potential disparity in the application of meritocratic principles. They illuminate a divergence in the proportion of several racial or ethnic groups, specifically white students, Latinos, African-Americans and Native Americans, who are granted admission solely based on academic prowess. These numbers, which reveal higher percentages for white students and systematically decreasing figures for the other mentioned groups, elicit questions on the fairness and impartiality of the college admission process, highlighting the importance of continued discussions on equal opportunities in higher education.

Around 67% of African-American students are admitted into the most selective universities, which is relatively lower compared to the 77% of white students.

Highlighting the disparities in college admissions rates between different racial groups provides crucial insights into the ongoing societal conversation about equality of opportunity and systemic biases. The datum that approximately 67% of African-American students are accepted by the most selective universities, ten percentage points less than their white counterparts at 77%, underlines the existence of a racial gap in higher education acceptance rates. In the context of a blog post scrutinizing race in college admissions, this discrepancy forms a powerful narrative of the challenges minority students face while pursuing academia and subtly spotlights the need for policies promoting diversity and inclusivity.

A study found that 75% of polled Americans said that colleges should not use race or ethnicity as part of the admissions process.

Unveiling a significant shift in public sentiment, a study reveals that a substantial 75% of surveyed Americans are of the view that colleges should steer clear of using race or ethnicity as criteria for the admissions process. In a blog post dissecting race in college admission statistics, this substantial percentage illuminates a potential call for reform and a reframing of notions towards equity in college admissions, marking critical insight and a broader standpoint for the discussion. The figure underscores the importance of revisiting the role and impact of racial considerations in admissions, offering an elucidation of contemporary attitudes towards diversity policies in higher education.

Data shows that Hispanic and African American students are more underrepresented in colleges than they were 35 years ago.

In the narrative of race in college admissions statistics, the glaring role of this statistic that highlights how Hispanic and African American students’ representation in colleges has dwindled over the past 35 years, cannot be overlooked. It beautifully but dishearteningly paints a picture of the persistently yawning racial gap despite the strides made towards equality in higher education. This statistic not only echoes the lingering diversity discrepancies in college admissions but also signals a warning bell for policymakers and educators alike, urging them to shore up policies to boost minority representation in colleges, thereby fostering a more diverse, inclusive learning environment.

African-Americans comprise 15% of the U.S. college-age population, but they only make up 6% of students in colleges and universities that are selective.

Highlighting the disparity between the representation of African-Americans in the U.S. college-age population and their presence in selective higher educational institutions uncovers a deep-seated issue of racial inequity embedded in access to academic opportunities. This stark polarity not only punctuates the existence of significant barriers to admission for African-American students, but also underscores the pressing need for increased attention and policy interventions to bridge this divide. When discussing race in college admissions statistics, this figure brings to the fore the essential discussion about democratizing access to academic environments, pushing for diversity, and ensuring fair crossing bridges over the educational opportunity gaps that continue to persistently echo racial disparities.

Asians have the highest average scores in both ACT and SAT among races.

Dissecting the college admissions process from the lens of racial demographics is an intricate task, punctuated by standout statistics such as the elevated average ACT and SAT scores among Asians. This revelation underscores the academic prowess often associated with this group, adding a level of nuance to the dialogue about diversity and representation in higher education. Amidst the ongoing conversation about meritocracy, affirmative action, and equality of opportunity, this statistic emerges as a pivotal point of reference, setting the backdrop for a multifaceted exploration of the intersectionality between race, academic achievement, and admission into institutions of higher education.

The proportion of all degrees awarded to black students increased from 9.5% in 2000 to 12.5% in 2016.

Reflecting on the growth in the ratio of all degrees awarded to black students from 9.5% in 2000 to 12.5% in 2016 underscores a pivotal manifestation of progress in the academic sphere. In a blog post exploring the role of race in college admissions statistics, this data signifies an encouraging trend towards greater inclusivity and diversity in higher education. This upward trend gives us an analytical foothold to confirm that opportunities for black students in higher education are steadily amplifying, shedding light on how policies, society and institutions have evolved to promote racial equality over the 16-year span. It leaves readers with profound insight into the dynamic landscape of college admissions and a more nuanced understanding of racial diversification in academia.

The proportion of Latina/o students in postsecondary education increased from 4% in 1976 to 18% in 2015.

Highlighting the significant climb in Latina/o student representation – from a mere 4% in 1976 to a promising 18% in 2015 – weaves an insightful narrative of gradual progress in diversity within postsecondary education. It underpins the potential efficacy of comprehensive admission policies in broadening college access to historically underserved racial/ethnic groups. This statistic not only serves to illustrate a triumphant evolution, it also subtly highlights an unfinished journey in reaching a balanced representation, thus fueling further reflections and discussions in a blog post about race in college admissions statistics.

In 2017, it was noted that at 468 of the top American colleges, the number of white students outnumbered minority students by three to one.

Highlighting the proportions present in prominent educational institutions, the data from 2017 that demonstrated an outnumbering of minority students by their white counterparts three to one at 468 top American colleges reveals stark racial imbalance that persists in higher education. Within a discussion about Race in College Admissions Statistics, this figure unearths a systemic disparity in enrollment rates, potentially reflective of longstanding socioeconomic, accessibility, and policy differences amongst different racial groups. Illuminating this aspect can encourage open dialogue about representation, equity, and inclusion in American academia, clarifying the necessity for proactive efforts for diversity and equal opportunities.

73% of the students at top-tier research universities are white or Asian.

Highlighting a very potent depiction of racial representation in elite higher education, the statistic – ‘73% of students at top-tier research universities are white or Asian’ serves as a keen informant of the prevailing disparities. In the discourse about Race In College Admissions Statistics, this fact, underscoring the dominant white and Asian-heritage demographics, can ignite dialogue about diversity, inclusivity, and equity. The essence here is not to project a number but to illuminate the mirroring effect between academic opportunities and racial groups. The demographical leanings in top universities, portrayed by this statistic, question the efficacy of the current admission policies and demand a deeper dive into the school practices ensuring equitable representation of all racial backgrounds.

There was an increase in Asian admission rates of 1.7 percent while white admission rates fell by 0.5 percent from 2015 to 2016.

Highlighting the contrasting dynamics of a 1.7 percent increase in Asian admission rates and a 0.5 percent decrease in white admission rates between 2015 and 2016, this statistic serves as an important pivot point in the discourse on race in college admissions statistics. Reflected in this numerical snapshot are the complex interplays of higher education policies, societal trends, and racial equity issues. Attention given to these fluctuations permits potential insights into the changing landscape of college admissions, propelling insiders and policymakers to scrutinize the underlying factors that contribute to these shifts. This, in turn, can help to foster a more inclusive and diversified academic environment.

From 2003-2013, the proportion of African American students enrolled at top-tier universities stayed relatively constant, around 7%.

This compelling statistic anchors a pivotal part of the discourse around Race in College Admissions Statistics, highlighting a stark, decade-long plateau in African American student representation at elite institutions. It paints a telling portrait of entrenched racial disparities perpetuated within higher education systems, inferring limited progress in diversifying the student populations at these establishments. From a broader perspective, it raises thought-provoking questions revolving around equity, access, and possibilities for enhancing diversity, thereby enriching the dialogues within the blog post.

Only about 35% of Hispanic high school graduates enroll in a 4-year degree program, compared to 46% of white high school graduates.

The stark contrast between the 35% of Hispanic high school graduates and the 46% of their white counterparts pursuing a 4-year degree underscores a pivotal stratification in the realm of higher education. When dissecting race in college admission statistics, this disparity cannot be overlooked, highlighting systemic inequalities American society is grappling with. It not only infers the existence of potential barriers preventing Hispanic students from matriculating into 4-year programs at a comparable rate, but also signifies the ensuing ramifications on workforce diversification, socio-economic mobility, and overall achievement of the American Dream within the Hispanic community. Ultimately, it elevates the call for scrutinizing existing admission policies and crafting strategic interventions to bridge this educational gap.

African American students are underrepresented at highly selective colleges and over-represented at open-access two- and four-year institutions.

Illuminating the stark realities of institutional disparities, the statistic demonstrates the racial imbalance in college admissions with African American students finding less representation in highly selective colleges compared to open-access institutions. It is instrumental in shedding light on the intricate dynamics of race within the domain of higher education, underscoring potentially systemic barriers that need to be overcome. A nuanced portrayal of these figures in the blog post about Race In College Admissions Statistics goes beyond mere numbers, inviting discussions about socio-economic implications, educational equity and unveiling the underlying narrative of racial stratification within our academic institutions.

From 1996 to 2012, selective public colleges showed a 35% decrease in Black student enrollment.

Nested within the overarching discourse of Race In College Admissions Statistics, the aforementioned statistic – a 35% decrease in Black student enrollment in selective public colleges from 1996 to 2012 – operates as a stark reminder of persisting disparities in the college admissions process. This precipitation throws a confronting spotlight on the disturbing regressive trends in racial inclusion in higher education, punctuating the urgent need to thoroughly examine, understand, and rectify biased admissions criteria, systemic shortcomings, and barriers that might perpetuate such inequities. It infers that despite past efforts, we may still be a distance away from achieving comprehensive racial diversity within our academic infrastructures, a reality that frames the importance of ongoing discussion and continuous work in the intersection of race and college admissions.

Asian Americans have seen a 10% increase in enrollment in Ivy League colleges from 1995 to 2017.

Highlighting the 10% increase in Asian American enrollment in Ivy League colleges from 1995 to 2017 underscores the evolving dynamic of racial diversity within prestigious U.S educational institutions. In the context of race in college admissions statistics, it paints a vivid picture of progress and potential barriers. This statistic, therefore, acts as a pivotal point of discourse, sparking investigation into initiatives promoting inclusivity and equitable representation. It also invites nuanced discussions about the efforts needed to ensure continued diversity expansion and the disposal of stereotypes and biases within the realm of higher education.

Nearly one-third (30%) of colleges consider racial/ethnic status in their admissions decisions.

Highlighting that nearly one-third (30%) of colleges consider racial/ethnic status in their admissions decisions underpins a significant focal point in the discourse about race in college admissions statistics. It sheds light on the magnitude of colleges that deploy race-conscious admission strategies, potentially aiming towards promoting diversity and equal opportunities. However, it also stokes debate around fairness and the merits of race-based versus merit-based admissions. Therefore, this statistic promises to keep the conversation pertinent and engaging, stirring diverse perspectives about the role of race and ethnicity in shaping the educational landscape.

40% of white students and 46% of Asian students meet college-readiness benchmarks on the ACT and SAT, compared to 11% for black students and 23% for Hispanic students.

Examining the disparities in college-readiness benchmarks between ethnic groups, as marked by ACT and SAT scores, shines a spotlight on a pressing educational issue. Notably, the statistic demonstrates that 40% of white students and 46% of Asian students are meeting these benchmarks, while the percentages for black students and Hispanic students are strikingly lower – 11% and 23% respectively. This significant gap in educational achievement forms a crucial cornerstone of any discussion on race in college admissions, providing a poignant illustration of the existing inequalities in access to higher education opportunities and educational resources. In essence, it flags a call for action to address systemic issues in education and the need for more inclusive policies in college admissions.

The enrollment of first-time, full-time students who were Black fell from 14.5% in fall 2010 to 11.7% in fall 2018 at postsecondary institutions.

In the ongoing dialogue about race and college admissions, the noted decline in enrollment of first-time, full-time Black students from 14.5% to 11.7% between 2010 and 2018 is a pressing concern. Highlighting a potential crisis in equal opportunities, this downward trend challenges the narrative of progressive diversity on college campuses. Within the context of race in college admissions statistics, this suggests that despite the effort to drive inclusivity, Black students’ presence in postsecondary institutions may be dwindling. Thus, this statistic compels a deeper inspection into system-wide barriers and encourages a vital conversation about how to address racial disparities to foster true inclusivity.


Based on the College Admissions Statistics, it’s clear that race continues to play a significant role in higher education admissions processes across the United States. The influence of this factor varies considerably across different colleges and states, sometimes leading to distinct discrepancies in acceptance rates among different racial and ethnic groups. Therefore, it’s crucial to continue working on policies and initiatives fostering diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education to ensure all students have equal opportunities.


0. –

1. –

2. –

3. –

4. –

5. –

6. –

7. –

8. –

9. –

10. –

11. –

12. –

13. –

14. –


How does race factor into college admissions?

College admissions processes often consider a holistic view of each student, which can include their race or ethnicity. This is intended to provide a diverse learning environment that benefits all students. However, it's important to note that race is not the only deciding factor, as institutions also mainly consider academic achievement, involvement in extra-curricular activities, and personal essays.

Is it legal for colleges and universities to consider race in their admissions process?

Yes, it is legal in the United States. But there are specific guidelines and limitations. The practice, known as Affirmative Action, has been regularly scrutinized and challenged in court but has generally been upheld, including by the Supreme Court, as a tool to combat systemic educational disparities.

Does considering race in college admissions make the process unfair?

The fairness of considering race in college admissions can be a subject of debate. Critics argue that it might be discriminatory and disadvantageous to some races. But proponents say that it promotes a diverse and robust learning environment that exposes students to different perspectives. It's also seen as a way to address racial disparities in educational opportunities and achievement.

Is race a determinant of admission at most colleges?

Not necessarily. While some colleges and universities do consider race as part of their holistic admission process, many others do not. Moreover, even institutions that do take race into account do not use it as a sole determinant. Other factors such as academic performance, test scores, essays, and extracurricular activities play more significant roles.

Do all racial or ethnic groups have the same chance of admission at a college that considers race?

The specific impact of race on college admissions can vary significantly from one institution to another. Generally, colleges that adopt Affirmative Action aim at increasing diversity, which might favor historically underrepresented or marginalized racial and ethnic groups. However, race is one of many factors considered, and being from a particular racial or ethnic group does not guarantee admission.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents