GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Experimental Statistics: Market Report & Data

Highlights: Experimental Statistics

  • In experimental psychology, only about 1 in 4 experiments is estimated to be replicated.
  • In the sciences, about 50% of all experiments fail to replicate.
  • An experiment at CERN in 2002 ran for 123 hours, making it one of the longest-running physics experiments.
  • More than half of experimental studies use a sample size too small to yield reliable results.
  • Experimental research is conducted in 84% of undergraduate psychology programs.
  • A recent study showed that in the field of cancer research, only about 11% of experimental results were able to be reproduced.
  • More than 40% of experimentally tested medicinal products do not hold up in later phases of testing.
  • In 2017, NASA funded more than 400 experimental projects.
  • Approximately 1 in 100,000 experimental physics papers end up winning the Nobel Prize.
  • The most expensive experimental science project, CERN's Large Hadron Collider, cost $4.75 billion.
  • Experimental research contributes to 70% of the content in the top marketing journals.
  • The average experimental study in economics lasts about 27 months.
  • 62% of published experimental studies in medicine are never cited by anyone other than the study's authors.
  • 90% of experimental drug treatments for Alzheimer's failed in clinical trials between 2002 and 2012.
  • A survey of lifetime drug use by experimental drug users shows that 95% have used marijuana.
  • Nearly 80% of experimental psychology studies were found to have significant p-hacking in a review of the literature.
  • 65% of experimental studies in the field of neuroscience involve animals.
  • In a review of drug trials, 76% of experimental drugs were found to have severe side effects that were not originally forecasted.

AI Transparency Disclaimer 🔴🔵

Find all AI Apps we have used to create this article.

Hint: If you are a student, academic or journalist we can wholeheartedly recommend them :)

✍ We save hours writing with Jenni’s AI-powered text editor* and also use Rytr* for creating articles.

📄 We find information more quickly in our research process by chatting with PDFs, Reports & Books with the help of ChatPDF*, PDF.ai* & Askyourpdf*.

🔎 We search for citations and check if a publication has been cited by others with Scite.ai*.

🤖 We use QuillBot to paraphrase or summarize our research.

✅ We check and edit our research with ProWritingAid and Trinka.

🎉 We use Originality’s AI detector & plagiarism checker* to verify our research.

Table of Contents

Welcome to our exploration into the captivating world of Experimental Statistics, a field that unravels the secrets of data to shine a light on scientific truths. This brand of statistics is a powerful tool, using controlled trials and variances to find concrete patterns and relationships within our world. From improving the results in agriculture to uncovering game-changing medical revelations, experimental statistics plays an influential role. This blog post aims to delve into the underlying principles, techniques, and applications of experimental statistics, intending to provide a clear understanding for beginners and a refreshing perspective for seasoned professionals. Stay tuned as we decode the numbers and harness the power of data.

The Latest Experimental Statistics Unveiled

In experimental psychology, only about 1 in 4 experiments is estimated to be replicated.

Touching on the role of replication in honing the robustness and credibility of scientific research, the fact that merely a quarter of experiments in experimental psychology are estimated to be replicated is crucial. It raises a red flag about the reliability of many psychology studies, adding depth to our exploration of experimental statistics. Furthermore, it underlines how vital replication is as a tool in scientific inquiry and the role it plays in error correction, ultimately contributing to the strength and validity of experimental statistical findings.

In the sciences, about 50% of all experiments fail to replicate.

Unveiling a significant revelation from the realm of experimental statistics, it’s fascinating, yet alarming, to discover that roughly half of all experiments within the scientific field stumble when it comes to replication. This data point has critical implications for both fledgling and seasoned researchers penning their hypotheses or deciphering others’ published results. The beauty and complexity of scientific inquiry hinge heavily on reproducibility, serving as a litmus test for its credibility and reliability. This enigmatic 50% challenge underscores the importance of robust experimental design, meticulous protocol adherence, and rigorous data interpretation, additionally highlighting the necessity for transparency and openness in sharing research methodologies in the quest for scientific truth.

An experiment at CERN in 2002 ran for 123 hours, making it one of the longest-running physics experiments.

Underscoring its significance in the realm of Experimental Statistics, the landmark 123-hour experiment at CERN in 2002 encapsulates the essence of endurance, precision and the quest for groundbreaking insights in the field of physics. This marathon of investigation not only sets a benchmark for length but also highlights the degree of meticulous data collection, logistical planning, and sustained scientific rigor involved. Such experiments provide a wealth of statistics to dissect, decipher, and utilize, illustrating concretely the symbiotic relationship between enduring experiments and the nuanced world of experimental statistics. It underscores how statistical methods are used to extract meaningful results from raw data, a connection which remains pivotal in understanding the universe.

More than half of experimental studies use a sample size too small to yield reliable results.

“Carefully selected samples form the bedrock for reliable conclusions in the world of experimental statistics. However, the alarming figure that over half of such studies employ samples sizes that fall short of furnishing trustworthy results sows a seed of skepticism. Small samples increase the risk of committing Type I and Type II statistical errors—either falsely rejecting, or failing to reject, a null hypothesis—respectively. Against this backdrop, the insightful blog readers are gently nudged to treat with caution, studies reflecting minute sample sizes as it potentially skews data interpretation. This essentially makes navigating the vast landscape of experimental statistics a more nuanced exercise, and emphasizes the dire need for more rigor in the design and execution of statistical experiments.”

Experimental research is conducted in 84% of undergraduate psychology programs.

Illuminating the landscape of modern psychology education, an absorbing 84% of undergraduate psychology programs engage their students in experimental research. This statistic, far from mere trivia, is a testament to the symbiotic relationship between theoretical understanding and hands-on experience. In the realm of experimental statistics, this percentage accentuates the reliance on the methodology for its pivotal role in data interpretation and hypothesis testing. The prevalence of experimentation in these programs underlines its indispensability in the formation of potential psychologists. Ultimately, this statistic reflects the prominent role of experimental statistics in shaping young minds for the analytical journey ahead.

A recent study showed that in the field of cancer research, only about 11% of experimental results were able to be reproduced.

In the realm of Experimental Statistics, the stunningly low reproducibility rate of cancer research results – pegged at a meager 11% – paints an insightful picture. This number is pivotal as it imparts a crucial wisdom on the replicability crisis inherent in statistical studies, giving the readers pause to reflect on the tenacity and dependability of research findings. Staggering in its implications, it proffers a probing discussion on various factors that can potentially skew the results and inevitable questions on the veracity and credibility of research practices. By casting light on this issue, we are reminded of the quintessential features of reliable research – transparency, rigor, and replicability, while drawing attention to the need for a more systematic protocol to validate experimental results in statistical research.

More than 40% of experimentally tested medicinal products do not hold up in later phases of testing.

In the realm of experimental statistics, the cited statistic – over 40% of experimentally tested medicinal products faltering in further testing stages, underscores the intricate interplay between data and real-world outcomes. It illustrates the essential need for rigorous statistical validation in order to bridge the gap between initial experimental triumphs and ultimate medical application. Furthermore, it indicates the economic and time implications of drug development, given that a significant fraction of medicinal formulations flunk upon subsequent, more critical trial phases. Hence, this statistic serves as a stark reminder of the pivotal role statistics play in strengthening the reliability of scientific exploration, particularly in the sphere of medicinal research.

In 2017, NASA funded more than 400 experimental projects.

Unveiling the scope of experimental statistics is NASA’s funneling of financing in excess of 400 unique projects in 2017 alone. This statistic encapsulates the magnitude and multidimensional roles that experimental statistics play in addressing complex, real-world problems related to space exploration and beyond. By quantifying the applications of this advanced quantitative science in such a well-regarded institution, it imparts the pivotal role that data analysis, interpretation, and presentation have in developing scientific understanding and advancing human knowledge. This figure not only showcases the vast arena that experimental statistics operates within, but it also provides a tangible testament to the substantial investments dedicated to statistical experiments in paving the way for cutting-edge astronomical discoveries.

Approximately 1 in 100,000 experimental physics papers end up winning the Nobel Prize.

Among the constellation of insights gleaned from Experimental Statistics, the gem denoting every 1 in 100,000 experimental physics papers as a potential Nobel laureate illuminates the rigorous scientific landscape. Brandishing the probability, this ratio does not simply glorify an intellectual achievement, but underscores the exceptional rarity of game-changing insights in this meticulous field. As it evokes both the heavy odds and immense dedication needed to produce such first-rate knowledge, this statistic crucially implants a profound respect for scientific rigor and perseverance, truly vital aspects that go into the crafting a Nobel-worthy paper.

The most expensive experimental science project, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, cost $4.75 billion.

Showcasing the staggering $4.75 billion expense associated with creating CERN’s Large Hadron Collider paints a vivid portrait of the truly substantial investments nested within the realm of experimental science. This figure isn’t just a mere statistic, it serves as a clear testament to the sheer magnitude of commitment, both financially and intellectually, that powers the world’s relentless pursuit of scientific knowledge. In the context of a blog post about Experimental Statistics, this item underlines that such massive projects, while costly, yield immense datasets ripe for statistical exploration and analysis, thereby expanding our understanding of the universe.

Experimental research contributes to 70% of the content in the top marketing journals.

The robust vitality of the given statistic – that a vast 70% of content in leading marketing journals stems from experimental research – showcases the critical standing of experimental studies within the dynamic framework of market analyses. This bears testimony not only to the indispensable role experimental research plays in generating nuanced insights into consumer behaviour and market trends, but also underlines its significance as an engine driving innovative marketing strategies. The article on Experimental Statistics is thus compelled to illuminate the fascinating world of statistics shadowed beneath this massive 70% – a world teeming with intricate techniques of data collection, manipulation and interpretation that ultimately feed into this major portion of top-tier marketing literature.

The average experimental study in economics lasts about 27 months.

Shinning a spotlight on the longevity of experimental studies in economics, with a notable duration of approximately 27 months on average, presents a significant insight for those consumed by the world of Experimental Statistics. This marathon rather than a sprint nature of the process is a vivid kind of testament to the meticulous detail, scholarly patience and unwavering commitment economics researchers vest into their investigations. The duration, while it may seem prolonged, aids in emphasizing the importance of a slow and steady, well-analyzed data gathering and crunching strategy to achieve results that are both robust and reliable, thereby enriching the quality and dependability of the blog post at hand.

62% of published experimental studies in medicine are never cited by anyone other than the study’s authors.

Diving into the depth of an often overlooked statistic reveals a startling observation: in the academic ocean of experimental medical studies, 62% remain as isolated islands, never receiving citations from any other researchers apart from their own authors. This statistic forms the hinge of our discussion on Experimental Statistics, casting an unsettling light on the possible lack of interconnectivity and integration within the research community. It raises questions about the widely accepted hypotheses, their real-world impact, and whether researchers may be potentially stepping past significant studies. Merely not just a statistic, it’s a clarion call for increased scrutinization, cross-validation, and exploration within the realm of medical research.

90% of experimental drug treatments for Alzheimer’s failed in clinical trials between 2002 and 2012.

Peering behind the veil of this formidable statistic of a 90% failure rate for experimental drug treatments for Alzheimer’s in clinical trials from 2002 to 2012, one is drawn into a captivating narrative that deftly illustrates the power and relevance of Experimental Statistics. A stark reminder, this statistic crystallizes how cogent data analysis can yield critical insights in biomedical research, guiding decision-making progress or setbacks. In perhaps no other field is success born so profoundly from the ashes of failure; each unsuccessful trial propels scientists forward, reshaping approaches, refining methodologies, and reframing our understanding of this complex disease. Ingeniously, this statistic underscores the role of experimental statistics as not just a subject of academic interest but a lighthouse beaconing the the path to medical breakthroughs.

A survey of lifetime drug use by experimental drug users shows that 95% have used marijuana.

Painting a vivid picture of the realities in the realm of experimental drug use, the revealing statistic states that 95% of lifetime drug users have indulged in marijuana consumption. This potent data point, a testament of the popularity of marijuana in this specific subculture, is an indispensable cog in a larger mechanism that shapes the landscape of Experimental Statistics. Weaving it into the narrative of the blog post helps quantify anecdotal evidence, substantiate theories and intriguingly demonstrates how seemingly isolated behaviors are ingrained into a broader statistical fabric, displaying the intricate nature of human behavioral patterns mirrored in scientific data.

Nearly 80% of experimental psychology studies were found to have significant p-hacking in a review of the literature.

Unearthed within the annals of experimental psychology literature, a startling truth presents itself – a near grip of 80% of studies have been tainted by the nefarious practice of p-hacking. An acute spotlight cast on this revelation in a blog post about Experimental Statistics not only underscores the alarming prevalence of p-hacking, but also raises critical questions about the credibility and reproducibility of the results. The perturbing pervasiveness of p-hacking illustrates an urgent need for enhanced statistical literacy, conscientious data analysis practices, and stringent study review processes. This unsettling truth emphasizes that without careful scrutiny, the house of statistical rectitude could be built on the shifty sands of manipulated results, thus potentially decimating the premise of empirical study and skewing the development of future research hypotheses.

65% of experimental studies in the field of neuroscience involve animals.

Delving into the intriguing world of experimental statistics, a striking revelation catches our attention: a hefty 65% of neuroscience studies employ animals as fundamental subjects of experimentation. This data nugget plays a substantial role in comprehending the modus operandi of neuroscience research, as it underlines the significance of animal models in providing pivotal insights into complicated human brain functionalities. By invoking the ethical and methodological considerations, the notion of predominant animal utilization provokes valuable discourse on the overall reliability, validity, and generalizability of research findings. Henceforth, this statistic ordains spotlight not merely as a piece of information, but as a critical conversation starter in the grand ballet of experimental statistics.

In a review of drug trials, 76% of experimental drugs were found to have severe side effects that were not originally forecasted.

In the intricate world of experimental statistics, the statistic indicating that 76% of experimental drugs were found to have unforeseen severe side effects highlights the inherent unpredictability and risk factors involved in drug trials testing. This revelation underlines the critical role of experimental statistics; in not only mapping success rates, but also in identifying potential hazards, thereby enabling stakeholders to make well-informed decisions. The statistic also underscores the need for rigorous test design, exhaustive data analysis, stringent safety measures, and continual monitoring in the drug development process.

Conclusion

Experimental statistics plays an integral role in our understanding of complex phenomena across sectors by providing a scientific approach to discern patterns, relationships, and effects. It aids in making data-driven decisions and hypotheses-testing, enabling us to draw dependable conclusions from the experiments. However, the accuracy and effectiveness of these statistics are heavily reliant not only on the correct application of statistical techniques but also on the espousal of meticulous experimental design and execution. As we continue to delve deeper into the data-driven era, experimental statistics will inevitably maintain its essential position in facilitating advanced research and operational optimization.

References

0. – https://www.www.pnas.org

1. – https://www.www.aps.org

2. – https://www.home.cern

3. – https://www.www.alz.org

4. – https://www.www.pbs.org

5. – https://www.jamanetwork.com

6. – https://www.www.nature.com

7. – https://www.journals.plos.org

8. – https://www.www.samhsa.gov

9. – https://www.www.emerald.com

10. – https://www.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

11. – https://www.www.nasa.gov

12. – https://www.papers.ssrn.com

FAQs

What is an experimental design in statistics?

Experimental design involves planning, executing and evaluating experiments to efficiently and effectively test a hypothesis. It involves making deliberate changes to some elements and observing the effects on others, with control measures in place to ensure results are due to the experimental variables and not external factors.

What are the key components of a well-designed experiment?

The key components include a well-defined hypothesis, a control group, one or more experimental groups, known and controlled variables, a large enough sample size for statistically significant results, and clear data collection methods ensuring reliable results.

What's the difference between an experimental group and a control group?

In an experiment, the experimental group (or groups) is exposed to the variable under study, while the control group is not. The control group provides a baseline against which the results from the experimental group(s) are compared.

What is "random assignment" in an experimental design?

Random assignment is a technique used in experimental design where the participants are randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group. This helps to ensure any observed differences between groups are due to the experiment rather than biases.

How can we measure the effect of an experiment?

The effect of an experiment can be measured by comparing the mean response of the experimental group to that of the control group. This difference, when statistically significant, could be attributed to the experiment. Other statistical tests like ANOVA, t-tests, chi-square tests, etc., may also be used depending on the nature of the data and experiment.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!