GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Clinical Trial Recruitment Industry Statistics

The clinical trial recruitment industry is growing rapidly, with increasing demand for diverse participants and innovative recruitment strategies to overcome challenges related to patient diversity and enrollment rates.

Highlights: Clinical Trial Recruitment Industry Statistics

  • Up to 80% of clinical trials fail to meet their recruitment targets on time.
  • About 27% of phase 3 clinical trials fail to recruit enough participants.
  • Only 3-5% of cancer patients enroll in a clinical trial, leading to recruitment troubles.
  • Approximately 38% of trials fail to meet their enrolment targets, while another 13% fail to enroll a single subject.
  • The global clinical trial service market was about $50 billion in 2020 and expected to increase annually by 7.5%.
  • It costs up to $50,000 per day for a clinical trial if it runs over the estimated timeline due to recruitment issues.
  • The cost to identify and recruit a new patient for a clinical trial generally averages around $20,000.
  • Approximately 11% of sites fail to recruit a single patient.
  • Roughly 50% of all research sites under-enroll patients for clinical trials.
  • Around 18% of trials are terminated early due to low recruitment.
  • Clinical trial recruitment costs typically represent 30% or more of the total expenditure for a trial.
  • Around 19% of clinical trials use social media for recruitment, with about 11% of these actually recruiting any participants from there.
  • Almost 20% of the sites recruit more than 100% of the targeted total sample size, contributing to as high as 36% of all patients who were randomized.
  • Clinical trials in the U.S. take approximately 31 months to complete, and patient recruitment consumes approximately 1/3 of that time.
  • It is projected that the global clinical trial market size will reach $69.8 billion by 2027.
  • In the US alone, more than 11,000 clinical trials can’t begin because they lack the necessary volunteers.
  • Online patient communities can increase clinical trial enrollments by 25%.
  • 25% of cancer trial closures are due to inadequate patient accrual, reflecting challenges in effective patient recruitment.

Table of Contents

The Latest Clinical Trial Recruitment Industry Statistics Explained

Up to 80% of clinical trials fail to meet their recruitment targets on time.

The statistic suggests that a large proportion of clinical trials face challenges in recruiting a sufficient number of participants within the planned timeline, with up to 80% of trials experiencing recruitment delays. This trend is concerning as delays in recruitment can lead to extended trial durations, increased costs, and potential implications for the validity and generalizability of study findings. Factors contributing to recruitment challenges in clinical trials may include strict eligibility criteria, limited patient awareness or access to trials, reluctance to participate in research, and operational constraints. Efficient strategies to enhance recruitment efforts, such as targeted outreach, collaboration with patient advocacy groups, and leveraging digital platforms, are crucial to improve trial success rates and expedite the development of new treatments and therapies.

About 27% of phase 3 clinical trials fail to recruit enough participants.

The statistic “About 27% of phase 3 clinical trials fail to recruit enough participants” indicates that approximately one-quarter of phase 3 clinical trials in the medical research field struggle to enroll the target number of participants necessary for the study to be conducted effectively and produce reliable results. This recruitment challenge can have significant implications for the progress and success of these trials, as insufficient participant numbers can compromise the statistical power and generalizability of the findings. Researchers and sponsors of clinical trials must address these recruitment issues through strategic planning, improved communication, and targeted outreach efforts to increase participation rates and ensure the timely completion of high-quality studies.

Only 3-5% of cancer patients enroll in a clinical trial, leading to recruitment troubles.

The statistic that only 3-5% of cancer patients enroll in a clinical trial highlights a significant challenge in the medical research field. Clinical trials are essential for testing the efficacy and safety of new treatments, but the low enrollment rate impedes the progress of research and development efforts. This low participation rate can be attributed to various factors such as lack of awareness about clinical trials, concerns about potential side effects, eligibility criteria, logistical challenges, and mistrust in the healthcare system. Efforts to increase awareness, improve communication between researchers and patients, address logistical barriers, and build trust are crucial in addressing recruitment troubles and ensuring the successful completion of clinical trials for cancer patients.

Approximately 38% of trials fail to meet their enrolment targets, while another 13% fail to enroll a single subject.

This statistic highlights a significant challenge within clinical trial research, indicating that a substantial portion of trials face issues with achieving their desired participant enrollment levels. Specifically, approximately 38% of trials fall short of meeting the pre-determined enrolment targets, which can have implications for the study’s overall success and validity. Moreover, another 13% of trials struggle even more severely, failing to enroll any subjects at all. These findings underscore the complexity and unpredictability involved in conducting clinical trials, emphasizing the need for careful planning, effective recruitment strategies, and potential adaptations throughout the research process to address these enrolment challenges and minimize the risk of trial failure.

The global clinical trial service market was about $50 billion in 2020 and expected to increase annually by 7.5%.

The statistic stated that the global clinical trial service market was valued at approximately $50 billion in 2020 and is projected to grow at an annual rate of 7.5%. This figure signifies the significant size and importance of the clinical trial services industry, which plays a crucial role in the development and testing of new medical treatments and pharmaceutical products. The predicted annual growth rate of 7.5% suggests a positive outlook for the market, indicating potential advancements in healthcare research and development efforts. This growth trajectory may be driven by factors such as increasing demand for innovative therapies, advancements in technology, and the globalization of clinical trials. Overall, the statistic highlights the expanding opportunities within the clinical trial services sector and underscores its impact on shaping the future of healthcare innovation.

It costs up to $50,000 per day for a clinical trial if it runs over the estimated timeline due to recruitment issues.

This statistic highlights the significant financial impact that recruitment issues can have on the cost of conducting a clinical trial. Specifically, it indicates that for each day a trial exceeds the estimated timeline due to challenges in recruiting participants, the costs can escalate up to $50,000. This underscores the importance of efficient recruitment strategies and careful planning to ensure that trials are completed within the projected timeframe and budget. By addressing recruitment issues promptly and effectively, researchers can help minimize the financial burden associated with delays in clinical trial timelines.

The cost to identify and recruit a new patient for a clinical trial generally averages around $20,000.

This statistic refers to the average cost incurred by organizations to locate and enroll a new participant for a clinical trial, which typically amounts to around $20,000. This cost includes various expenses such as advertising, outreach efforts, screening procedures, and administrative tasks involved in the recruitment process. Clinical trials are essential for advancing medical research and developing new treatments, but their success heavily relies on enrolling an adequate number of suitable participants. The high cost per patient recruited underscores the challenges and resources required in identifying eligible individuals willing to participate in these trials, highlighting the importance of efficient recruitment strategies in clinical research.

Approximately 11% of sites fail to recruit a single patient.

The statistic “Approximately 11% of sites fail to recruit a single patient” indicates that out of all the sites involved in a particular clinical trial or study, around 11% are unable to successfully recruit any patients. This may be a significant challenge for the study organizers, as sites are crucial for enrolling participants and collecting data. A failure to recruit any patients at these sites could impact the overall progress and outcomes of the study, potentially leading to delays or limitations in the results. Identifying and addressing the reasons behind this recruitment failure at these sites is important for ensuring the success of the study.

Roughly 50% of all research sites under-enroll patients for clinical trials.

The statistic that roughly 50% of all research sites under-enroll patients for clinical trials indicates that half of the locations where studies are conducted are not meeting their target enrollment numbers. This under-enrollment can have significant consequences, such as prolonging the time it takes to complete the trial, increasing costs, and potentially compromising the validity and generalizability of the study results. Factors contributing to under-enrollment may include challenges in patient recruitment, eligibility criteria that are too restrictive, lack of awareness about the trial among potential participants, and logistical issues. Addressing this issue is crucial to improving the efficiency and success of clinical trials in advancing medical research and developing new treatments.

Around 18% of trials are terminated early due to low recruitment.

The statistic “Around 18% of trials are terminated early due to low recruitment” indicates that a substantial proportion of research studies are prematurely halted because they fail to enroll enough participants. This suggests a common challenge in conducting clinical trials, where the inability to recruit a sufficient number of subjects can hinder the study’s progress or compromise the reliability of the results. Early termination due to low recruitment can have significant implications for the validity and generalizability of the findings, as well as for the investment of resources and time dedicated to the research study. This statistic underscores the importance of effective recruitment strategies and proactive planning in ensuring the successful completion of clinical trials.

Clinical trial recruitment costs typically represent 30% or more of the total expenditure for a trial.

This statistic suggests that a considerable proportion of the total expenditure for a clinical trial is allocated towards recruitment costs, with at least 30% of the budget typically being dedicated to this purpose. The recruitment of participants is a crucial aspect of conducting a successful clinical trial, as the study’s validity and results heavily rely on obtaining a sufficient number of eligible participants. These recruitment costs may encompass various expenses such as advertising, screening, enrollment incentives, and staff time spent on recruitment activities. Ensuring an effective recruitment strategy is essential in order to achieve the necessary sample size and adhere to the study timeline and budget constraints.

Around 19% of clinical trials use social media for recruitment, with about 11% of these actually recruiting any participants from there.

The statistic suggests that approximately 19% of clinical trials are utilizing social media platforms as a means of recruitment. However, only about 11% of these trials are successful in recruiting participants from these channels. This indicates that while a significant portion of clinical trials are turning to social media for recruitment purposes, the effectiveness of this strategy in actually enrolling participants is relatively low. It may be indicative of potential challenges or limitations in engaging and converting individuals from social media platforms into active participants in clinical trials, highlighting the need for further research and strategies to optimize recruitment efforts in this digital landscape.

Almost 20% of the sites recruit more than 100% of the targeted total sample size, contributing to as high as 36% of all patients who were randomized.

The statistic indicates that a significant number of research sites in a study are recruiting more participants than originally planned for, with almost 20% of sites exceeding 100% of their intended sample size. This phenomenon is leading to a situation where as much as 36% of all randomized patients in the study are coming from these sites. The over-recruitment at these sites suggests either a high level of participant interest or effective recruitment strategies being employed. However, it may also raise concerns about the representativeness of the study sample, potential biases in the recruitment process, and the need for careful evaluation of the data to ensure the study’s findings are robust and generalizable.

Clinical trials in the U.S. take approximately 31 months to complete, and patient recruitment consumes approximately 1/3 of that time.

The statistic highlights the average timeline of clinical trials in the U.S., with the entire process taking around 31 months to complete. Notably, patient recruitment, a critical aspect of the trial process, accounts for approximately one-third of the total duration, indicating that on average, around 10 months are dedicated solely to recruiting participants. This emphasis on patient recruitment underscores the challenges and time-consuming nature of identifying and enrolling suitable candidates for clinical trials, which is crucial for the successful execution and completion of medical research studies aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of new treatments or interventions.

It is projected that the global clinical trial market size will reach $69.8 billion by 2027.

This statistic projects that the global clinical trial market size is expected to grow significantly and reach $69.8 billion by the year 2027. This indicates a substantial increase in the demand for clinical trials worldwide, reflecting a growing emphasis on research and development in the healthcare industry. The projected market size suggests a rising investment in clinical research to develop and test new treatments, drugs, and medical devices. Factors such as advancements in technology, increasing prevalence of diseases, and the need for evidence-based medicine are likely driving this growth in the global clinical trial market. This projection serves as a key indicator of the expanding opportunities and importance of clinical trials in shaping the future of healthcare and pharmaceutical industries.

In the US alone, more than 11,000 clinical trials can’t begin because they lack the necessary volunteers.

The statistic reveals a significant issue in the United States where more than 11,000 clinical trials are unable to start due to a shortage of volunteers. This shortage of participants hinders the progress of medical research and potentially delays the development of new treatments and therapies. Clinical trials are crucial for testing the safety and efficacy of new drugs, treatments, and medical devices, and the inability to start these trials poses a barrier to advancements in healthcare. Encouraging participation in clinical trials is essential for advancing medical knowledge and ultimately improving patient care. Efforts to raise awareness about the importance of clinical trial participation and to address barriers that prevent individuals from volunteering may help address this issue and facilitate the timely initiation of critical research studies.

Online patient communities can increase clinical trial enrollments by 25%.

This statistic suggests that online patient communities have a significant impact on increasing clinical trial enrollments by 25%. This means that individuals who are part of online patient communities are more likely to enroll in clinical trials compared to those who are not involved in such communities. This increase in enrollment can be attributed to the support, information sharing, and engagement opportunities that online patient communities provide for individuals considering participation in clinical trials. By leveraging these online platforms, researchers and healthcare providers can tap into a larger pool of potential participants and ultimately improve the recruitment and retention rates for their clinical trials.

25% of cancer trial closures are due to inadequate patient accrual, reflecting challenges in effective patient recruitment.

This statistic means that one-fourth of clinical trials investigating cancer treatments are prematurely terminated due to insufficient enrollment of patients, underscoring the difficulties in effectively recruiting patients for these trials. When a trial lacks enough participants, it can lead to delays in research progress, hinder the ability to draw meaningful conclusions about the treatment being studied, and may ultimately impact the development of new therapies for cancer patients. Improving patient recruitment strategies, increasing awareness about clinical trials, and addressing barriers that prevent patients from participating are critical to ensuring the success and completion of cancer trials.

Conclusion

The statistics related to the Clinical Trial Recruitment industry provide valuable insights into the current landscape of participant recruitment and retention. Understanding these trends and challenges is crucial for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of clinical trials. By staying informed about the latest statistics, stakeholders can make informed decisions to enhance the overall success of clinical trials and ultimately advance medical research.

References

0. – https://www.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

1. – https://www.www.acrpnet.org

2. – https://www.www.pharmavoice.com

3. – https://www.www.biopharmadive.com

4. – https://www.jamanetwork.com

5. – https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

6. – https://www.www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com

7. – https://www.www.clinicalleader.com

8. – https://www.www.forteresearch.com

9. – https://www.www.grandviewresearch.com

10. – https://www.www2.deloitte.com

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!