
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Employee Monitoring System Software of 2026
Top 10 ranking of employee monitoring system software with criteria and tradeoffs for IT and HR, including Teramind, Time Doctor, Hubstaff.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Teramind is the best choice for IT and HR that need governed evidence trails for endpoint and app activity investigations, while Time Doctor fits teams that prioritize consistent time-based activity reporting for distributed work and want monitoring tied to reporting.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Teramind
Investigation timelines that correlate agent telemetry with rule-triggered events, giving analysts a single evidence view.
Built for fits when IT and HR need governed evidence trails for endpoint and app activity investigations..
Time Doctor
Editor pickWork-session reporting that links idle time and application usage to time tracking analytics.
Built for fits when HR needs consistent time-based activity reporting for distributed teams..
Hubstaff
Editor pickScreenshot capture can be configured on a timed schedule and aligned to work periods for consistent review.
Built for fits when distributed teams need time-linked oversight evidence with configurable manager alerts..
Comparison Table
Teramind
enterpriseEmployee monitoring, user activity tracking, and insider threat prevention platform.
Investigation timelines that correlate agent telemetry with rule-triggered events, giving analysts a single evidence view.
Teramind collects agent-based signals from endpoints and can add application usage, web browsing, and screen-based capture depending on deployment configuration. Monitoring rules can trigger alerts that route to investigation workflows, and evidence views let admins review activity timelines around incidents. Governance controls include RBAC-style permissions and administrative audit trails that record who changed monitoring settings and when.
A tradeoff is that fine-grained capture increases operational load because retention policies and evidence access must be governed carefully across teams. Teramind fits situations where IT and HR share a need to investigate access or performance incidents, such as suspected policy violations or high-risk user behavior, while maintaining controlled analyst access.
- +Configurable monitoring rules that generate investigator-ready alert context
- +Agent-based endpoint telemetry with optional app and web activity capture
- +RBAC-style access controls for analysts and separate admin permissions
- +API and SIEM log forwarding support integration into existing workflows
- –Fine-grained capture increases governance and retention management workload
- –Alert tuning can take iteration to reduce noise in mixed user environments
- –Screen capture depth may require careful policy design to match needs
- –Endpoint agent rollout planning is required for consistent coverage
HR investigations teams
Review suspected policy violations
Faster case documentation with audit trails
IT security operations
Investigate account misuse indicators
More consistent triage and evidence
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance and audit teams
Maintain evidence retention governance
Repeatable evidence handling
Retention and access controls support controlled review windows for audits and inquiries.
Workforce risk managers
Detect risky user behavior trends
Higher signal for interventions
Alert configuration and reporting support repeated review of high-risk activity patterns.
Best for: Fits when IT and HR need governed evidence trails for endpoint and app activity investigations.
Time Doctor
SMBTime tracking and employee monitoring with screenshots and web/app usage logging.
Work-session reporting that links idle time and application usage to time tracking analytics.
Time Doctor is a fit for IT managers and HR teams that want monitoring tied to work-session reporting rather than forensic-only investigations. The Admin console supports role-based access for managing who can view reports and configure monitoring behavior. Reporting exports help teams compile audit-friendly documentation for attendance and usage trends.
A key tradeoff is that Time Doctor focuses on productivity and time narratives more than deep investigation workflows such as complex evidence retention controls or forensic-grade artifact trails. It fits when supervisors need consistent visibility into idle time and application activity across distributed teams.
- +Time and activity reporting are designed around work sessions
- +Central dashboard supports role-based access to monitoring reports
- +Application usage and idle time patterns are easy to review
- +Administrative configuration keeps monitoring rules consistent across devices
- –Investigation workflows are less detailed than dedicated enterprise monitoring suites
- –Monitoring accuracy depends on stable agent deployment and user device behavior
HR operations teams
Investigate attendance and productivity patterns
Faster coaching and policy enforcement
IT managers
Standardize monitoring across endpoints
Lower variance across devices
Show 1 more scenario
Team leads
Review daily focus and workload
More targeted one-on-ones
Leads can use activity reports to spot prolonged idle time and off-task app usage.
Best for: Fits when HR needs consistent time-based activity reporting for distributed teams.
Hubstaff
SMBTime tracking with screenshots, activity levels, and GPS monitoring for remote teams.
Screenshot capture can be configured on a timed schedule and aligned to work periods for consistent review.
Hubstaff is commonly used when teams need a measurable work log plus lightweight monitoring evidence tied to shifts and roles. The system records activity at the application and desktop level and can capture screenshots on a schedule, which supports workforce oversight during remote work. Alerting is rule based, and reports can be exported for review cycles.
A tradeoff is that Hubstaff monitoring depth is not positioned as network and endpoint interception for deep incident response. It fits best when HR and operations teams need consistency across distributed teams and managers want audit-friendly logs tied to time entries and attendance patterns. For internal IT or compliance groups, the integration and governance effort depends on how widely automation and data forwarding are required.
- +Scheduling-based evidence collection ties screenshots to work windows
- +Rule-based alerts support manager review without manual sorting
- +Exports and analytics make monthly oversight reporting straightforward
- +API access supports custom dashboards and data pipelines
- –Monitoring is not designed for network traffic visibility
- –Privacy governance requires careful configuration of capture schedules
- –Advanced workflows depend on integration maturity and setup time
- –Evidence retention controls need active policy management by admins
Operations and HR teams
Remote schedule adherence monitoring
More consistent work attendance
Customer support supervisors
App usage productivity checks
Faster coaching interventions
Show 2 more scenarios
IT operations leaders
Custom reporting dashboards
Centralized analytics
Teams use the Hubstaff API to pull monitoring and time data into internal reporting.
Compliance and governance owners
Evidence retention policy review
Documented oversight cycles
Admins export activity reports to support periodic reviews of monitoring practices.
Best for: Fits when distributed teams need time-linked oversight evidence with configurable manager alerts.
Insightful
SMBEmployee monitoring and time tracking software formerly known as Workpuls.
Retention clock governance ties evidence lifespan to admin-defined policy and review windows across captured activity.
Insightful is an employee monitoring system that focuses on web, app, and endpoint behavior visibility with an evidence-first approach for HR and IT investigations. The product emphasizes configurable collection rules, retention governance, and role-based access so teams can control what gets captured and who can review it.
Insightful also supports admin workflows like alerting and escalation and provides exportable reporting for compliance review. Integration options rely heavily on API and log forwarding patterns for downstream tooling, which affects how quickly SIEM and helpdesk processes can be wired in.
- +Configurable capture scope reduces evidence sprawl across endpoints
- +Alerting and escalation workflows support faster incident triage
- +Retention governance helps align evidence lifecycles to policy clocks
- +Audit-friendly access logging supports review trails for administrators
- –Advanced rollout needs careful endpoint agent configuration discipline
- –For deeper network and TLS visibility, setup complexity increases
- –Reporting exports require manual mapping to internal compliance formats
- –High-volume sites can stress alert tuning without governance standards
Best for: Fits when HR and IT need configurable evidence retention and audit trails for workplace investigations.
InterGuard
enterpriseEndpoint employee monitoring with keystroke logging, screenshots, and content filtering.
Group-scoped monitoring configuration that ties policy scope to device and directory group membership.
InterGuard records employee endpoint activity with admin-configurable monitoring scopes and evidence retention. The product combines agent-based telemetry for device and application events with reporting views for review workflows.
InterGuard also supports investigation-style exports that help translate collected activity into case materials for internal review. Setup centers on policy configuration and role-based access to monitoring data.
- +Endpoint-focused monitoring policies that cover device and application events
- +Role-scoped access controls for viewing monitored activity
- +Investigation exports that convert activity into review-ready evidence
- +Configurable monitoring scope per group and device
- –Less integration depth than suites with wide SIEM and app ecosystem coverage
- –Admin governance depends on consistent policy configuration across groups
Best for: Fits when IT and HR need endpoint-centered evidence for internal investigations with controlled access.
Kickidler
enterpriseEmployee monitoring and screen recording with real-time desktop viewing.
Retention clock governance with configurable evidence lifecycle and exportable audit-friendly session records.
Kickidler is an employee monitoring system focused on evidence capture and admin workflow for managing workforce surveillance use cases. It combines endpoint activity timelines with application usage views, configurable alerts, and retention controls that support ongoing access logging and review.
The solution also supports centralized policy configuration for multi-user rollouts and exports for compliance reporting workflows. Kickidler is typically assessed by IT managers and HR teams that need controllable monitoring scope with audit trail review instead of ad hoc viewing.
- +Configurable alert rules tied to monitored endpoint activity patterns
- +Clear activity timelines that combine apps, idle time, and session context
- +Centralized retention governance controls for evidence lifecycle management
- +Export-oriented reporting for compliance review workflows
- –Deep governance requires careful configuration to avoid overly broad coverage
- –Some investigation workflows rely on navigation across multiple report views
- –API and automation features are not the primary strength versus UI controls
- –Agent-based data collection can add operational overhead during rollouts
Best for: Fits when HR and IT need evidence retention governance plus alert-driven investigations for endpoint activity.
CurrentWare
SMBEndpoint security and employee monitoring suite with BrowseReporter and BrowseControl.
Rule-based alerting tied to monitoring configurations creates an audit trail from trigger to escalation workflow.
CurrentWare focuses on employee endpoint monitoring with a governance-first admin console. The product supports agent-based telemetry for web and application activity, screen behavior, and device usage signals, then routes results into searchable evidence views.
CurrentWare also provides alerting and escalation workflows tied to monitoring rules, with retention controls aimed at keeping evidence accessible for investigations. Integration capability centers on directory synchronization and log export patterns that help connect monitoring output to existing compliance reporting and security workflows.
- +Agent-based endpoint telemetry supports detailed employee activity evidence views
- +Alerting and escalation workflows map monitoring rules to operational responses
- +Directory synchronization helps keep user targets aligned with corporate identities
- +Retention controls support evidence governance for ongoing investigations
- –Configuration requires monitoring policy design and evidence retention planning discipline
- –Workforce activity coverage depends on endpoint agent deployment and stability
- –Deep governance and review workflows may add admin workload for small teams
- –Some security integration paths rely on exported logs rather than native SIEM connectors
Best for: Fits when mid-size IT and HR teams need endpoint-focused evidence capture with rule-driven alerts for investigations.
ActivTrak
enterpriseWorkforce analytics and productivity monitoring with behavioral insights.
Retention governance controls that manage how evidence clocks run for investigations across endpoints.
ActivTrak focuses on agent-based endpoint monitoring and activity analytics across web, applications, and idle time. The product emphasizes configurable monitoring rules, evidence retention controls, and admin visibility into who accessed what.
ActivTrak also supports integrations for exporting operational data and for routing alerts into downstream workflows. Organizations evaluate it for governance-first deployment patterns and investigation workflows built around captured activity timelines.
- +Agent-based endpoint telemetry with activity timelines by user and device
- +Configurable monitoring rules for web and application usage categories
- +Evidence retention governance controls for investigative traceability
- +Alerting workflow that supports downstream escalation and triage
- –Web and app category tuning can take time to reach consistent signal
- –Screen capture and deeper collection features may require add-on enablement
- –Large estates need careful performance planning for reporting workloads
- –RBAC depth may require manual review of admin role boundaries
Best for: Fits when IT and HR need endpoint activity monitoring with retention governance and repeatable investigations.
WorkTime
SMBEmployee productivity and time tracking software by NesterSoft.
WorkTime’s alerting rules map directly to device activity events and drive escalation workflows.
WorkTime captures employee activity from managed endpoints and turns it into timelines for application usage and idle time. It supports alerting and escalation workflows tied to measurable events, and it includes reporting designed for compliance-style evidence retention.
The agent-based telemetry model focuses on what users do on devices, with integrations aimed at identity synchronization and SIEM export. Administration centers on role-based access, audit logs, and configuration controls for monitoring scope.
- +Event-based timelines for applications and idle time on managed endpoints
- +Configurable alerting and escalation tied to monitoring events
- +Identity synchronization support helps reduce manual user provisioning
- +Audit logs support governance checks for changes and access
- –Agent deployment is required, which limits coverage for unmanaged devices
- –Advanced retention governance requires careful policy configuration by admins
- –Web and app evidence depth can vary by app type and OS behavior
- –API and automation surface is narrower than the largest enterprise suites
Best for: Fits when IT and HR teams need endpoint-focused activity evidence plus alert workflows.
SentryPC
SMBComputer monitoring, filtering, and time management software for employees and families.
Evidence-style investigation reports that combine screen activity, application usage, and web activity on a single device timeline.
SentryPC targets IT and HR teams that need endpoint-focused employee activity monitoring with centralized visibility. It collects agent telemetry for application usage, web activity, and screen activity, then organizes findings into searchable reports for HR investigations.
The admin surface centers on policy configuration, role-based access for monitoring tasks, and retention controls for the evidence dataset. Integrations focus on exporting event data for operational workflows and aligning logs with existing security processes.
- +Endpoint agent collects application, web, and screen activity for investigation timelines.
- +Central policy configuration supports consistent monitoring coverage across managed devices.
- +Role-based access restricts who can view reports and export evidence datasets.
- +Audit-oriented event records support internal review workflows and documentation.
- –Monitoring scope depends on agent deployment, which adds rollout and onboarding overhead.
- –Event-to-investigation context can require manual report assembly for complex cases.
- –API and automation are limited for workflow orchestration compared with enterprise monitoring suites.
Best for: Fits when HR and IT need agent-based endpoint monitoring reports and controlled access for internal case reviews.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 hr in industry, Teramind stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right employee monitoring system software
Employee monitoring system software uses agent-based endpoint telemetry and configurable rules to produce evidence timelines for employee activity monitoring across applications and devices. This buyer’s guide covers Teramind, Time Doctor, Hubstaff, Insightful, InterGuard, Kickidler, CurrentWare, ActivTrak, WorkTime, and SentryPC based on how they generate investigation-ready context, how they govern evidence lifespan, and how they drive alerting and escalation workflows.
The sections that follow focus on integration depth and administration controls, especially where tools connect monitoring events to investigator views and retention clock governance. Teramind is highlighted for correlating agent telemetry with rule-triggered events in a single evidence view, while Time Doctor is positioned around work-session reporting that links idle time and application usage to time tracking analytics.
Employee monitoring system software for governed endpoint activity evidence
Employee monitoring system software collects endpoint agent telemetry and turns it into auditable activity records that support investigations, alerting, and escalation workflows. These systems typically include configurable monitoring rules, evidence capture scheduling, and retention clock governance so administrators can control what gets collected and how long it is kept.
Teramind emphasizes investigation timelines that correlate agent telemetry with rule-triggered events so analysts can view event-to-evidence context without manually stitching reports. Insightful centers retention clock governance that ties evidence lifespan to admin-defined policy and review windows across captured activity, which reduces evidence sprawl when policies need consistent enforcement.
Integration, governance, and evidence-linking features to compare
Employee monitoring system software becomes actionable only when monitoring events and investigator views connect through consistent rules, evidence timelines, and retention clock governance. Tools vary most in how they structure investigation context, how they control evidence lifespan, and how they automate alert-to-escalation workflows.
Event-to-evidence correlation for investigator timelines
Teramind correlates agent telemetry with rule-triggered events so analysts get a single evidence view for investigations. SentryPC also builds evidence-style device timelines but its event-to-investigation context can require manual report assembly for complex cases.
Retention clock governance for evidence lifecycle control
Insightful ties evidence lifespan to admin-defined policy and review windows to prevent uncontrolled evidence growth. Kickidler and ActivTrak both use retention clock governance, but Insightful emphasizes evidence sprawl reduction through configurable capture scope.
Alerting and escalation workflow mapping to monitoring rules
CurrentWare maps rule triggers to alerting and escalation workflows so each investigation starts with audit-relevant trigger context. WorkTime also ties event-based timelines to configurable alerting and escalation workflows, but its advanced retention governance requires careful admin policy configuration.
Role-based access control and manager or case access scoping
Time Doctor provides a central dashboard with role-based access to monitoring reports so HR can focus on time-based reporting. InterGuard limits access through group-scoped monitoring configuration and role-scoped controls for viewing monitored activity.
Capture scope control with scheduled or policy-based evidence collection
Hubstaff schedules screenshot capture aligned to work periods so evidence is tied to specific time windows for manager review. Insightful and Kickidler focus on configurable capture scope and retention governance so evidence coverage stays aligned with policy rather than collecting everything by default.
Monitoring depth tied to endpoint agent deployment stability
Teramind and CurrentWare deliver agent-based endpoint telemetry coverage that depends on stable rollout across managed endpoints. WorkTime and ActivTrak also rely on endpoint agents, and coverage quality can degrade when agent deployment and user device behavior are inconsistent.
Choose by governance depth, evidence-linking workflow, and coverage scope
The first decision should separate tools that prioritize investigation-ready evidence correlation from tools that prioritize work-session reporting for HR timekeeping. The second decision should focus on governance and automation surfaces, especially how alert context and retention clocks behave under real investigation load.
Pick the workflow shape: evidence correlation versus time-session reporting
If investigations require linking agent telemetry to rule-triggered events in one evidence view, Teramind is built around investigator-ready context correlation. If the primary need is time-based reporting tied to idle time and application usage for HR, Time Doctor centers on work-session reporting designed for consistent distributed team analytics.
Require retention clock governance tied to admin policy and review windows
For audit-focused organizations that must control how long captured evidence remains accessible, Insightful ties evidence lifespan to admin-defined policy and review windows. Kickidler and ActivTrak also provide retention clock governance, so the selection should compare how each tool reduces evidence sprawl across endpoints and sessions.
Match alerting automation to how escalation cases are actually handled
If alert triggers must map directly into an operational escalation workflow with trigger-to-work context, CurrentWare is designed around rule-based alerting that produces an audit trail through escalation. If escalation is driven by device event timelines and admin-configured rules, WorkTime supports event-based timelines with configurable alerting and escalation workflows.
Select governance scoping based on your HR and IT access boundaries
If case access must be restricted to HR roles and reporting views, Time Doctor’s role-based access to monitoring reports helps keep monitoring use aligned to specific job functions. If access must be limited by device and directory group membership, InterGuard’s group-scoped monitoring configuration and role-scoped viewing controls align policy scope to directory groups.
Decide how evidence should be captured: scheduled capture windows versus broad capture coverage
If evidence needs to be tied to work periods, Hubstaff’s screenshot capture can be configured on a timed schedule aligned to work windows. If evidence must be constrained to prevent sprawl, tools like Insightful and Kickidler emphasize configurable capture scope paired with retention clock governance.
Validate coverage assumptions with endpoint agent rollout constraints
If endpoint agent deployment can be maintained across the managed fleet, Teramind and SentryPC support agent-based endpoint activity collection that feeds investigation timelines. If there are unmanaged device segments or rollout friction, tools that depend on agent stability like WorkTime and ActivTrak may reduce evidence reliability when devices or users behave inconsistently.
Who needs employee monitoring system software and which fit matters
Different teams use employee monitoring system software for different operational goals. HR teams typically need consistent, role-scoped reporting tied to time and activity patterns, while IT teams need governance controls and predictable evidence lifecycle management for investigations.
IT administrators and security operations teams handling endpoint investigation cases
Teramind supports investigator-ready evidence correlation, and CurrentWare maps alert triggers to escalation workflows with audit-relevant trigger context. These fit teams that need a controlled investigation trail across endpoint activity events.
HR leaders responsible for distributed workforce time reporting and oversight
Time Doctor is built around work-session reporting that links idle time and application usage to time tracking analytics with role-based access to reports. This fits HR oversight workflows that prioritize time and activity consistency over deep multi-view investigations.
Mid-size HR and IT teams standardizing evidence handling across endpoints
Insightful and Kickidler both emphasize evidence lifecycle governance through retention clock controls, which reduces evidence sprawl when policies must be enforced consistently. This fits teams that want configurable capture scope paired with review-window governance.
Organizations requiring access control aligned to directory or group membership
InterGuard ties monitoring policy scope to device and directory group membership and uses role-scoped access controls for viewing monitored activity. This fits environments where monitoring access boundaries must follow established group governance.
Manager-led monitoring teams that review evidence tied to scheduled work windows
Hubstaff schedules screenshot capture aligned to work periods and uses rule-based alerts to support manager review without manual sorting. This fits manager workflows that depend on predictable capture timing.
Common buyer pitfalls in employee monitoring system software
Mistakes usually happen when evidence retention and investigator context are treated as afterthoughts. Buyers also fail when rollout planning does not match the tool’s dependency on endpoint agents.
Selecting a tool for monitoring coverage without validating retention clock governance requirements
Insightful and ActivTrak both provide retention clock governance, but advanced governance still requires deliberate admin policy configuration. Evidence lifecycle planning should be evaluated before rollout because fine-grained capture can create retention management workload.
Assuming alert notifications will be enough for investigations without evidence correlation
Teramind’s correlation of agent telemetry with rule-triggered events provides a single evidence view that reduces investigator stitching. Tools like SentryPC can require manual report assembly for complex cases when event-to-investigation context is not already packaged.
Choosing scheduled capture without aligning screenshot windows to actual work patterns and privacy expectations
Hubstaff can align screenshot capture to work windows through timed schedules, but privacy governance still depends on careful configuration of capture schedules. Screenshot evidence should be mapped to operational work hours before production use.
Overlooking rollout discipline for endpoint agent stability
WorkTime and ActivTrak depend on endpoint agent deployment for evidence accuracy and coverage. If endpoint rollout is incomplete or device behavior is inconsistent, monitoring accuracy can degrade and alerts may not reflect intended activity patterns.
Using group access controls without standardizing policy scope across groups
InterGuard’s group-scoped monitoring ties policy scope to directory groups, which can cause governance gaps if policy configuration is inconsistent. CurrentWare and Insightful also require monitoring policy design and evidence retention planning discipline to avoid overly broad coverage.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated employee monitoring system software on features depth, ease of administration, and the value teams get from governance and investigation workflows. Features accounted for 40% of the scoring because investigation-ready context depends on how rules, evidence timelines, and alerts fit together.
Ease of administration and value each accounted for 30% of the scoring because retention governance and alert tuning directly impact day-to-day workload. Teramind set the ranking pace by correlating agent telemetry with rule-triggered events into a single investigator-ready evidence view, which reduces the time needed to connect triggers to employee activity evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions About employee monitoring system software
How do Teramind and Insightful differ in evidence retention governance for investigations?
Which tools provide alerting and escalation workflows that map to investigation cases rather than just notifications?
How does RBAC and audit logging differ between Teramind and InterGuard during daily admin operations?
When teams need identity and directory-driven scope, how do InterGuard and CurrentWare handle monitoring scope?
What breaks if data migration and schema planning are skipped for tools that feed SIEM or downstream workflows?
How do Time Doctor and Hubstaff differ when time tracking accuracy depends on monitoring signals?
Which tools are better suited for configurable collection control at the rule and scope level?
When geolocation monitoring and device compliance telemetry matter, which tools align best with endpoint governance expectations?
How should administrators validate automation pipelines that pull monitoring data into operational workflows?
Where does screenshot capture fall short compared with full evidence timelines in products like Hubstaff and SentryPC?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Employee System Monitoring Software of 2026
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Employee Remote Work Monitoring Software of 2026
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Employee Monitoring & Time Tracking Software of 2026
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Employee Screen Monitoring Software of 2026
- HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Linux Employee Monitoring Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
HR In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of hr in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare hr in industry tools→