
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Policy Government MattersTop 10 Best Anti Corruption Software of 2026
Ranked top 10 anti corruption software tools with features and pricing signals, plus comparisons for compliance and ethics teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
NAVEX One is the best fit for compliance teams that need governed anti-corruption case workflows and attestations across business units, whereas Whispli works better when you want repeatable reporting and case handling with a strong audit trail.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
NAVEX One
Unified case management with status-driven audit trails that connect intake, assignments, and investigation closure.
Built for fits when compliance teams need governed case workflows and attestations across business units..
OneTrust Ethics Program Management
Editor pickConfigurable ethics case management links intake, investigation steps, and closure artifacts under a single audit-tracked workflow.
Built for fits when ethics and investigations operations require structured case workflows with controlled access and traceable history..
Whispli
Editor pickCase stage audit history that captures each decision, reviewer, and attachment trail across disclosures and third-party reviews.
Built for fits when compliance teams need repeatable anti-corruption case workflows with strong audit history..
Related reading
Comparison Table
NAVEX One
enterpriseCompliance software covering ethics reporting, investigations, policy management, and third-party risk.
Unified case management with status-driven audit trails that connect intake, assignments, and investigation closure.
NAVEX One supports program operations that run end to end, including employee attestations, training completion tracking, and speak-up case workflows tied to investigation records. Admin controls cover assignment configuration, permissioning for compliance roles, and reporting that shows which items are due, completed, or overdue.
A key tradeoff is that organizations often need deliberate configuration work to map internal roles, approval sequences, and ownership rules into the platform workflow engine. NAVEX One fits best when compliance teams need consistent governance across business units and can formalize how requests move from intake to approval to closure.
- +Configurable approval workflows for attestations, cases, and compliance tasks
- +Role-based access controls for restricted compliance operations and case handling
- +Case management records maintain a structured audit trail across statuses
- +Training assignment tracking links completion to compliance governance reporting
- –Requires governance discipline to align workflow steps with internal operating model
- –Integration setup can be heavier when multiple enterprise systems must exchange events
- –Some investigations and reviews need process refinement before teams can scale intake
- –Cross module reporting takes careful configuration to match internal KPIs
Compliance program managers
Run global attestation and approvals
Fewer missed commitments
Investigations teams
Manage speak-up investigation lifecycle
Consistent case handling
Show 2 more scenarios
Third-party risk analysts
Standardize counterparty review documentation
More repeatable decisions
Collect structured review inputs and document outcomes for repeatable oversight and internal review cycles.
Compliance admins
Control access and governance policies
Stronger internal controls
Use role-based access controls and configuration settings to restrict workflow actions to approved roles.
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed case workflows and attestations across business units.
More related reading
OneTrust Ethics Program Management
enterpriseEthics and compliance software for reporting, case management, policies, and training.
Configurable ethics case management links intake, investigation steps, and closure artifacts under a single audit-tracked workflow.
OneTrust Ethics Program Management is designed for ethics program operations that must run speak-up intake, triage, and investigation under a controlled workflow. It provides structured reporting forms and configurable intake fields so organizations can standardize allegation details before case assignment and tracking. It also records activity history for case steps so compliance teams can show how decisions moved through the workflow. Integration depth is strongest when the broader OneTrust suite is already in use, because identity, data flows, and governance patterns tend to align across modules.
A key tradeoff is that the ethics workflow configuration and data modeling require admin attention to avoid inconsistent intake outcomes across reporting channels. A common usage situation is when an enterprise ethics team must coordinate investigations across regions and business units while maintaining consistent case steps, assignments, and audit trail continuity.
- +Configurable speak-up case workflows with structured intake fields
- +Case activity history supports audit trail continuity across steps
- +Role-based access supports separation between intake, investigators, and reviewers
- +Investigation management stays linked to reporting and closure evidence
- –Admin workflow and intake configuration needs governance discipline
- –Customization can increase time for requirement mapping across regions
- –Cross-tool implementation depends on how the broader OneTrust environment is set up
- –Advanced automation often needs process design rather than out-of-the-box rules
Ethics and investigations teams
Run investigations from intake to closure
Consistent case handling
Compliance operations managers
Coordinate multi-region speak-up processes
Fewer process variations
Show 2 more scenarios
Legal and audit stakeholders
Review case decision trails
Clear audit support
Use case activity history to verify who changed statuses and when decisions advanced.
GRC program owners
Centralize ethics reporting intake
Faster initial assessment
Collect structured allegation details to improve triage quality and assignment accuracy.
Best for: Fits when ethics and investigations operations require structured case workflows with controlled access and traceable history.
Whispli
SMBSecure reporting and case management software for workplace misconduct and compliance concerns.
Case stage audit history that captures each decision, reviewer, and attachment trail across disclosures and third-party reviews.
Whispli’s core capability is structured case management for anti-corruption evidence, with configurable steps for collecting disclosures and resolving exceptions. Review flows can be assigned to specific approvers and compliance owners, which supports consistent handling of gifts, hospitality, and conflict disclosures. The audit trail records activity at each stage, which helps reduce gaps when disputes require reconstruction.
A tradeoff is that Whispli is most effective when compliance processes map cleanly to its built-in intake and workflow patterns, since highly custom schemas may need workaround mapping. It fits situations where teams run frequent disclosures and third-party reviews and need repeatable routing plus durable history for internal audits and investigations.
- +Configurable review workflows for disclosures and exceptions
- +Audit trail ties actions to case stages and reviewers
- +Guided intake reduces inconsistent submissions
- +Role-based access supports separation of duties
- –Workflow mapping can be limiting for unusual processes
- –Deep third-party data enrichment needs additional sources
- –Bulk operations may feel slow for very large registries
- –Admin setup requires careful governance to avoid misroutes
Compliance operations teams
Manage gifts and hospitality disclosures
Fewer missed reviews
Third-party risk teams
Track intermediary due diligence cases
Consistent case closure
Show 2 more scenarios
Legal and investigation teams
Run internal allegation workflows
Faster evidence reconstruction
Maintain a controlled case timeline with documented actions and supporting materials.
HR and business managers
Collect conflict-of-interest attestations
Lower compliance follow-up
Assign attestations, collect responses, and escalate flagged entries through defined routing.
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need repeatable anti-corruption case workflows with strong audit history.
More related reading
Aravo
enterpriseThird-party risk management software for due diligence, onboarding, monitoring, and compliance.
Configuration of governed third-party questionnaire workflows tied to status, evidence collection, and approval routing.
Aravo targets third-party risk and anti-corruption workflows by centralizing questionnaires, evidence requests, and case tracking for counterparty due diligence. It supports structured approval and document collection loops, with an audit trail that records responses, status changes, and review outcomes. Automation focuses on intake, reminders, and routing so governance teams can keep investigations and remediation actions moving across vendors and intermediaries.
- +Workflow-driven due diligence keeps approvals, documents, and exceptions in one process view
- +Audit trail captures response and status history across questionnaires and reviews
- +Automation for intake and evidence collection reduces manual follow-ups
- +Case tracking supports remediation and review cycles for high-risk counterparties
- –Reporting depth can lag specialized compliance analytics tools
- –Setup requires careful workflow configuration to avoid duplicate questionnaires
- –Advanced automation depends on administrators maintaining mappings and templates
- –Integration breadth varies by deployment pattern and may require professional services
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed third-party due diligence workflows with audit trail and case management.
GAN Integrity
enterpriseCompliance management software for third-party risk, policies, training, and reporting.
Case record workflow ties review evidence, decision outcome, and investigator actions to one auditable activity timeline.
GAN Integrity provides anti-corruption risk management workflows that connect third-party due diligence, case handling, and policy attestation into one operational record. The system supports risk scoring and evidence collection for counterparty reviews, including document uploads and status-driven progression through approval steps.
Admin configuration focuses on assignment, role separation, and audit trail generation for investigator and approver activity. Automation is centered on queue management and workflow transitions rather than content generation.
- +Workflow-driven third-party reviews with evidence capture and status controls
- +Audit trail supports traceability from intake to final decision
- +Assignment rules help keep case ownership consistent across teams
- +Configuration supports role separation for approver and reviewer duties
- –API coverage appears limited for custom integrations and high-throughput sync
- –Advanced investigation workflows may require process discipline to stay consistent
- –Reporting depth for compliance KPIs can feel constrained for mature programs
- –Data governance features for complex entity hierarchies may be basic
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need controlled third-party reviews with clear ownership and an audit trail.
EQS Integrity Line
enterpriseWhistleblowing and case management software for compliance and integrity reporting.
Integrated speak-up intake and investigation workflow with audit trail coverage across case lifecycle actions.
EQS Integrity Line is an anti-corruption and integrity case management system built around speak-up reporting workflows and case handling. It supports multilingual reporting channels, anonymous intake options, and structured investigation support with audit-ready activity trails.
The product also connects compliance administration tasks such as policy attestations, training assignment tracking, and conflict-of-interest disclosures to managed governance workflows. EQS Integrity Line is differentiated by its emphasis on end-to-end reporting-to-investigation operations rather than point screening only.
- +Case workflow design ties intake, triage, and investigation steps together
- +Audit logs track case status changes for governance reviews
- +Multi-channel reporting supports anonymous submissions
- +Admin configuration supports role-based access for case handlers
- –Case handling configuration requires governance discipline across jurisdictions
- –Third-party due diligence and screening breadth is not the core focus
- –Deep integrations depend on the available API and connector setup
- –Workflow customization can feel heavy for small teams
Best for: Fits when integrity programs need end-to-end speak-up case workflows with structured governance trails.
More related reading
Case IQ
enterpriseInvestigation management software for ethics cases, misconduct reports, and compliance issues.
Configurable investigation case workflows that link actions and evidence to an auditable activity history.
Case IQ focuses on managing bribery and corruption cases through configurable case workflows tied to evidence, actions, and outcomes. It centralizes investigation management with structured tasks and documentation so compliance teams can track reviews end-to-end.
The system supports approval workflows for remediation steps and stores an audit trail for activity history. Case IQ is built to fit organizations that need governed case handling rather than only risk scoring.
- +Case workflow configuration supports evidence, tasks, and outcomes in one place
- +Audit trail captures who changed what across case activities
- +Approval workflow support fits remediation steps with documented sign-off
- +Investigation-centric design reduces spreadsheet-based case tracking
- –RBAC and governance controls need deliberate configuration for larger teams
- –Third-party due diligence integrations are narrower than broad screening suites
- –Automation depth depends on workflow setup rather than built-in orchestration
- –Reporting granularity can lag behind specialized compliance analytics tools
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed investigation case management with evidence tracking and sign-off workflows.
Whistleblower Software
SMBWhistleblowing software for confidential reports, investigations, and compliance documentation.
Case timeline that records every intake, assignment, and status change linked back to the original report record.
Whistleblower Software is built around speak-up reporting workflows that route submissions into case management for triage, investigation, and resolution. The product centers on anonymous reporting options and an audit trail that tracks submission handling actions over time.
Admin users manage access and workflow steps for intake, assignment, and closure decisions. Integration and automation depend on its export and API-oriented hooks for connecting external compliance tooling to the case workflow.
- +Anonymous submission handling with case-linked audit trail
- +Configurable triage to investigation workflow steps
- +RBAC-style access separation for intake, investigators, and administrators
- +Case timeline preserves status changes for internal accountability
- –Automation depth depends on API coverage rather than no-code workflows
- –Third-party due diligence views are not a native replacement for screening tools
- –Reporting templates need configuration work for multi-region governance
- –Complex escalation paths require careful workflow design
Best for: Fits when organizations need managed whistleblower intake and investigation workflows with auditable case handling.
More related reading
Red Flag Reporting
SMBAnonymous reporting software for fraud, bribery, misconduct, and compliance violations.
Investigation case management that connects report intake, step-by-step updates, and audit-ready history in one workflow.
Red Flag Reporting manages compliance case workflows tied to allegations, audit evidence, and follow-up actions. The system supports ingestion of reports, routing to investigators, and retention of an audit trail for later review.
Admin controls center on assignment, permissions, and documented activity history. Its focus on reporting-to-case execution makes it a better fit for speak-up operations than for end-to-end risk scoring alone.
- +Case workflow ties incoming reports to investigation steps and closure
- +Audit trail records user actions across routing, updates, and outcomes
- +Assignment and permissions support controlled investigator access
- +Retention of evidence links helps keep investigations reviewable
- –Limited visibility into third-party risk data sources and screening feeds
- –Approval workflow depth can feel shallow for complex multi-stage signoffs
- –Automation options for proactive monitoring are not prominent
- –Requires consistent governance of evidence tagging and case taxonomy
Best for: Fits when organizations need structured speak-up case handling with a clear audit trail for investigations.
StarCompliance
enterpriseEmployee compliance software covering conflicts, disclosures, attestations, and monitoring.
Configurable case workflows that link screening signals to approvals, investigation steps, and immutable decision history.
StarCompliance is an anti-corruption risk management system aimed at end-to-end third-party due diligence and ongoing oversight. It connects screening inputs like sanctions, adverse media, and politically exposed person data into investigations, case workflows, and decision records.
It also supports governance artifacts such as audit trails, approvals, and configurable policies that align with anti-bribery requirements. Teams typically use it to centralize counterparty risk signals, assign reviews, and retain structured documentation for compliance reporting.
- +Case management ties screening results to documented decisions and outcomes
- +Approval workflows support multi-step review patterns for higher-risk counters
- +Audit trail preserves who approved, changed, or closed each review
- +Automation reduces manual handoffs between screening intake and investigations
- –Requires strong onboarding to map internal risk criteria to the configuration model
- –Investigation workflows can feel complex when only simple screening is needed
- –API coverage is narrower for custom reporting than for core screening intake and case actions
- –Data import patterns need careful normalization to avoid duplicate counterparties
Best for: Fits when compliance teams need governed case workflows that connect counterparty screening to auditable decisions.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 policy government matters, NAVEX One stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right anti corruption software
Anti corruption software in this guide is evaluated through the way it runs case lifecycles, records auditable timelines, and governs who can act on intake, evidence, and outcomes. Coverage ranges from NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management for governed ethics and investigation workflows to Aravo and GAN Integrity for third-party due diligence and review-centric case management.
The selection set also includes Whispli, EQS Integrity Line, Case IQ, Whistleblower Software, Red Flag Reporting, and StarCompliance, each with different emphasis on stage-based audit trails, speak-up routing, and how screening or questionnaires connect to approvals and closure artifacts.
Anti corruption software for governed ethics cases, third-party reviews, and audit-tracked decisions
Anti corruption software coordinates structured workflows for ethics reports, investigations, and third-party due diligence so every decision is tied back to a case record with a controllable audit trail. NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management focus on configurable case workflows that connect intake to investigation steps and closure artifacts under governed access controls.
For third-party due diligence, Aravo centers questionnaire workflows that link evidence collection and approval routing to case status and audit history. StarCompliance connects counterparty screening signals to multi-step approvals and immutable decision history so risk findings translate into documented outcomes that case teams can act on and audit.
Anti corruption case governance, audit trails, and workflow control
Anti corruption software should treat every intake, decision, and closure artifact as a case lifecycle event tied to an auditable history. Tools in this set vary most on how tightly intake and evidence link to approvals and how consistently the audit trail spans multiple workflow steps.
Category teams also need controlled access to case actions so only assigned roles can edit evidence, move stages, and record final outcomes. The strongest options here pair workflow configuration with governed access controls so the audit record reflects actual governance behavior, not just document storage.
Unification of case workflow with status-driven audit trails
NAVEX One ties intake, assignments, and investigation closure into a unified case record with status-driven audit trails. OneTrust Ethics Program Management also centralizes ethics case management with audit-tracked workflow steps from intake to closure artifacts.
Speak-up intake and structured investigation lifecycle routing
EQs Integrity Line combines speak-up intake with investigation workflow design and audit log coverage across case lifecycle actions. Red Flag Reporting connects incoming reports to investigation steps and closure in one workflow with audit-ready history.
Third-party due diligence workflows with evidence capture and approval routing
Aravo focuses on governed third-party questionnaire workflows tied to status, evidence collection, and approval routing. GAN Integrity ties review evidence, decision outcomes, and investigator actions into a single auditable activity timeline for controlled third-party reviews.
Audit-tracked decision history linked to case stages and reviewer actions
Whispli captures case stage audit history that records each decision, reviewer, and attachment trail across disclosures and third-party reviews. StarCompliance links screening signals to approvals, investigation steps, and immutable decision history so documented outcomes connect to screening findings.
Evidence-linked investigation case workflows with configurable sign-offs
Case IQ supports configurable investigation case workflows that link evidence, tasks, and outcomes into one auditable activity history. Whistleblower Software adds anonymous submission handling with case-linked audit trail and configurable triage to investigation workflow steps.
Select by workflow model: governed case lifecycles versus screening-to-decision mapping
The primary selection fork is how the product models the case lifecycle. NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management are built around governed case workflows that connect intake to investigation steps and closure artifacts with configurable workflow approvals.
A second fork is whether the system centers third-party questionnaire orchestration or screening-to-decision traceability. Aravo and GAN Integrity focus on third-party review workflows with evidence and approvals, while StarCompliance ties counterparty screening signals directly to documented decisions and immutable decision history.
Map the workflow backbone to intake-to-closure governance
If intake, assignments, and investigation closure must live on one status-driven case timeline, evaluate NAVEX One because it explicitly connects those lifecycle points with status-driven audit trails. If ethics operations require a structured ethics workflow that links speak-up intake, investigation steps, and closure artifacts under a single audit-tracked workflow, evaluate OneTrust Ethics Program Management.
Choose the control layer for case actions and approvals
If restricted compliance operations need role-based access controls alongside configurable approval workflows for cases and attestations, prioritize NAVEX One because it includes RBAC for restricted compliance and case handling. If controlled access is enough and the core requirement is configuration of speak-up workflows with structured intake fields and case activity history, evaluate OneTrust Ethics Program Management.
Decide whether third-party questionnaires drive the compliance workflow
If third-party due diligence depends on governed questionnaire workflows tied to status, evidence collection, and approval routing, prioritize Aravo. If the priority is controlled third-party reviews where evidence capture and investigator actions are bound to an auditable activity timeline, evaluate GAN Integrity.
Align audit history granularity with case stage behavior
If audit evidence must show reviewer actions and attachment trails across case stages and decisions, evaluate Whispli because it captures case stage audit history with reviewer and attachment trail detail. If audit history must connect screening signals to multi-step review patterns and immutable decision records, evaluate StarCompliance because it ties screening results to documented decisions and outcomes.
Test whether configuration supports unusual workflows without bottlenecks
If the program expects non-standard processes that need workflow mapping flexibility, review Whispli because its workflow mapping can be limiting for unusual processes. If the team expects complex, multi-stage signoffs, validate whether Red Flag Reporting’s approval workflow depth supports those signoff patterns without feeling shallow for complex routing.
Confirm integration and automation expectations before rollout
If custom integration requirements must support high-throughput sync, assess GAN Integrity because its API coverage appears limited for custom integrations and high-throughput sync. If third-party data enrichment depth matters beyond native questionnaire workflows, validate Whispli because deep third-party data enrichment needs additional sources.
Who anti corruption software fits, based on workflow ownership and audit expectations
Anti corruption software buyers in this set usually own either ethics and investigations case governance or third-party due diligence workflows that must carry audit trails. The tools differ in where they concentrate configuration effort and how directly they connect intake, evidence, and outcomes to an audit-ready history.
Best-fit use cases appear when governance requires documented decisions, stage-based histories, and controlled access for case action owners. Buyers should match the product model to the workflow model used by internal investigators and third-party due diligence teams.
Compliance teams running governed ethics investigations across business units
NAVEX One fits when governed case workflows and attestations must stay consistent across business units with approval workflows and RBAC for restricted operations.
Ethics operations that manage speak-up triage and structured case closure artifacts
OneTrust Ethics Program Management fits when speak-up intake and investigation steps need structured case workflows with a single audit-tracked process history.
Teams that orchestrate third-party due diligence with questionnaires and evidence collection
Aravo fits when third-party due diligence depends on governed questionnaire workflows that capture evidence, track status, and route approvals.
Investigations teams that need stage-level audit histories with reviewer accountability
Whispli fits when stage decisions and attachment trails must be auditable with reviewer-level decision capture across disclosures and reviews.
Organizations that must connect screening findings to documented counterparty decisions
StarCompliance fits when counterparty screening signals must translate into multi-step approvals and immutable decision history tied to case outcomes.
Common anti corruption workflow mistakes that break audit defensibility
The most frequent failure mode is choosing a product that can store documents but cannot consistently govern case transitions and audit history. Several tools here require disciplined configuration to match the organization’s operating model so audit trails reflect decision-making rather than ad hoc handling.
Another recurring issue is underestimating third-party review data needs and integration coverage. Several options in this set focus on workflows and audit histories but show limitations for screening feeds, enrichment depth, or custom integration throughput.
Treating workflow configuration as a one-time setup instead of a governance alignment exercise
NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management both require governance discipline to align configured steps and intake fields with how teams actually operate during attestations and case handling.
Assuming third-party due diligence workflows replace broader screening and enrichment
Whispli’s deep third-party data enrichment depends on additional sources, and Red Flag Reporting provides limited visibility into third-party risk data sources and screening feeds.
Overloading a case workflow with unusual processes that exceed the workflow mapping model
Whispli can be limiting for unusual processes, so unusual decision branches should be validated during workflow mapping rather than after rollout.
Choosing a tool without checking API coverage for integration throughput requirements
GAN Integrity shows limited API coverage for custom integrations and high-throughput sync, so high-volume event exchange requirements need early validation.
Mapping screening outputs without a clear path to approvals and immutable decisions
StarCompliance connects screening signals to multi-step approvals and immutable decision history, while StarCompliance-like requirements need configuration depth that StarCompliance provides but other tools may not match as directly.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated how each platform runs anti corruption case lifecycles with auditable timelines, then scored feature coverage at 40% based on workflow control, evidence capture, and audit-trail continuity across intake, investigation steps, and closure. Ease of use and value each accounted for 30% by assessing how quickly teams can configure case workflows and maintain operational consistency across jurisdictions or business units.
NAVEX One earned the top ranking by combining configurable approval workflows for attestations and cases with role-based access controls for restricted compliance operations and by linking intake, assignments, and investigation closure into status-driven audit trails. The remaining tools ranked by how consistently their standout case workflows connect reviewer actions, evidence attachments, and closure artifacts to governance-grade history.
Frequently Asked Questions About anti corruption software
How do NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management differ in governing end-to-end compliance workflows?
Which tools support API- and export-based integration hooks for routing cases into other compliance systems?
How does conflict-of-interest and gifts workflow automation work in Whispli compared with Aravo?
When should anti-corruption teams choose GAN Integrity over Case IQ for investigation management?
What breaks if approvals and RBAC are not configured before case intake in NAVEX One and OneTrust Ethics Program Management?
How do Whistleblower Software and Red Flag Reporting handle anonymous submissions and subsequent case audit trails?
Where does EQS Integrity Line fall short for teams that mainly need third-party due diligence screening workflows?
How do audit trail coverage goals differ between NAVEX One and Whispli during disclosure handling?
Which tool is better suited for integrating sanctions, adverse media, and politically exposed person signals into a governed case workflow?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Policy Government Matters alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of policy government matters tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare policy government matters tools→