Key Takeaways
- 300 million full-time jobs globally could be automated by generative AI
- 18% of work globally could be automated by AI with a larger impact on developed markets
- AI could contribute a 7% increase in global GDP over a 10-year period
- 44% of legal tasks can be automated by generative AI
- 46% of administrative tasks are liable to be replaced by AI algorithms
- 35% of business and financial operations tasks could be automated by AI
- 80% of US workers could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by LLMs
- 19% of US workers could see at least 50% of their tasks impacted by AI
- Women are 58% more likely than men to be in roles at high risk of AI automation
- Jobs requiring creative thinking show a 73% increase in demand despite AI
- Analytical thinking is the top skill prioritized for training by 48% of companies
- Demand for AI and machine learning specialists is expected to grow by 40% by 2027
- 49% of executives believe AI will reduce the size of their total workforce by 2025
- 79% of business leaders believe AI is necessary to remain competitive
- 55% of companies are using AI in at least one business function
Generative AI could replace many jobs but also create new roles and economic growth.
Corporate Adoption & Strategy
Corporate Adoption & Strategy Interpretation
Future Skills & Training
Future Skills & Training Interpretation
Global Economic Impact
Global Economic Impact Interpretation
Sector-Specific Disruption
Sector-Specific Disruption Interpretation
Workforce Demographics
Workforce Demographics Interpretation
Sources & References
- Reference 1GOLDMANSACHSgoldmansachs.comVisit source
- Reference 2IMFimf.orgVisit source
- Reference 3WEFORUMweforum.orgVisit source
- Reference 4MCKINSEYmckinsey.comVisit source
- Reference 5STATISTAstatista.comVisit source
- Reference 6ONSons.gov.ukVisit source
- Reference 7PWCpwc.comVisit source
- Reference 8ILOilo.orgVisit source
- Reference 9IBMibm.comVisit source
- Reference 10IDCidc.comVisit source
- Reference 11OXFORDECONOMICSoxfordeconomics.comVisit source
- Reference 12GARTNERgartner.comVisit source
- Reference 13ACCENTUREaccenture.comVisit source
- Reference 14REUTERSreuters.comVisit source
- Reference 15WELLS FARGOwells fargo.comVisit source
- Reference 16PWCpwc.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 17BROOKINGSbrookings.eduVisit source
- Reference 18HUBSPOThubspot.comVisit source
- Reference 19OECDoecd.orgVisit source
- Reference 20ORACLEoracle.comVisit source
- Reference 21BLSbls.govVisit source
- Reference 22ERICSSONericsson.comVisit source
- Reference 23THOMSONREUTERSthomsonreuters.comVisit source
- Reference 24SHRMshrm.orgVisit source
- Reference 25ETHNOLOGUEethnologue.comVisit source
- Reference 26NARnar.realtorVisit source
- Reference 27IFRifr.orgVisit source
- Reference 28IEAiea.orgVisit source
- Reference 29EYey.comVisit source
- Reference 30OPENAIopenai.comVisit source
- Reference 31KENAN-FLAGLERkenan-flagler.unc.eduVisit source
- Reference 32PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 33MICROSOFTmicrosoft.comVisit source
- Reference 34SBAsba.govVisit source
- Reference 35SALESFORCEsalesforce.comVisit source
- Reference 36AARPaarp.orgVisit source
- Reference 37WFHRESEARCHwfhresearch.comVisit source
- Reference 38NBERnber.orgVisit source
- Reference 39RESUMEBUILDERresumebuilder.comVisit source
- Reference 40UPWORKupwork.comVisit source
- Reference 41OECD-OPSIoecd-opsi.orgVisit source
- Reference 42LIGHTCASTlightcast.ioVisit source
- Reference 43DOLdol.govVisit source
- Reference 444DAYWEEK4dayweek.comVisit source
- Reference 45JPMORGANCHASEjpmorganchase.comVisit source
- Reference 46LINKEDINlinkedin.comVisit source
- Reference 47MCKINSEYmckinsey.comVisit source
- Reference 48HOLONIQholoniq.comVisit source
- Reference 49UNESCOunesco.orgVisit source
- Reference 50DELOITTEdeloitte.comVisit source
- Reference 51EDed.govVisit source
- Reference 52MITmit.eduVisit source
- Reference 53FORBESforbes.comVisit source
- Reference 54NATUREnature.comVisit source
- Reference 55GOOGLEgoogle.comVisit source
- Reference 56ADWEEKadweek.comVisit source






