If 2026 workplaces feel more scrutinized than ever, the data says the shift is not happening fast enough to stop bullying. In the US, 60% of employees think HR should be involved when bullying occurs, while 71% of organizations worldwide still report only a formal reporting channel rather than consistent prevention. We also see the human cost in the outcomes, from productivity losses to higher distress and burnout, so it is worth understanding exactly what is driving the pattern.
Key Takeaways
- 34% of bullied workers reported being assigned unreasonable workloads as part of bullying — behavior type share (Eurofound analysis)
- 28% of employees in Germany reported experiencing workplace bullying — prevalence estimate referenced in the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) risk monitoring material
- 60% of US employees say HR should be involved when bullying occurs — governance expectation rate from Workhuman's employee experience research on bullying/harassment
- 71% of organizations worldwide report having a formal process or channel for reporting misconduct — compliance channel adoption rate from Deloitte human capital reporting
- Workers who experienced workplace bullying are 1.5x more likely to report reduced productivity — relative productivity impact estimate from a systematic review
- The global workplace bullying market for HR case management/training solutions is estimated at $2.8 billion in 2023 — market size estimate relevant to prevention/management technology spend
- Europe’s direct economic costs of bullying at work are estimated at €20 billion annually — cost estimate reported in a European Commission context document
- Bullying victims show a 0.59 standard deviation increase in psychological distress compared with non-victims — standardized effect size from a meta-analysis
- Workplace bullying increases risk of self-reported ill health by 1.44 (relative risk) — pooled effect size from a systematic review
- Meta-analysis evidence links workplace bullying with increased work-related strain and psychosocial outcomes with an average correlation of r=0.30 — pooled relationship strength (peer-reviewed meta-analysis)
- 76% of HR professionals report increased attention to employee well-being and psychological safety post-2020 — policy/priority trend relevant to bullying prevention
- 20% of surveyed US workers reported experiencing some form of workplace bullying or harassment during the past year (2014–2018 NHIS analysis referenced in NIOSH report)
- Workplace bullying was associated with increased PTSD symptom severity (standardized mean difference 0.67) in a meta-analysis
- A systematic review found workplace bullying increased odds of common mental disorders by 1.29 (pooled odds ratio)
- In a global workplace survey, 60% of employees reported they would not report misconduct if they believed it would have negative consequences for them
Workplace bullying affects millions, harms health and productivity, yet most workplaces lack effective support and reporting.
Related reading
01 · Category
Perpetrators & Victims1 stats
01
34% of bullied workers reported being assigned unreasonable workloads as part of bullying — behavior type share (Eurofound analysis)
Interpretation
Perpetrators & Victims Interpretation
From the “Perpetrators & Victims” perspective, 34% of bullied workers say the bullying included being given unreasonable workloads, underscoring how perpetrators may target victims by overloading them.
02 · Category
Prevalence Rates1 stats
01
28% of employees in Germany reported experiencing workplace bullying — prevalence estimate referenced in the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) risk monitoring material
Interpretation
Prevalence Rates Interpretation
Under the Prevalence Rates lens, 28% of employees in Germany reported experiencing workplace bullying, highlighting that this problem affects more than a quarter of the workforce and is not a rare occurrence.
03 · Category
Organizational Controls2 stats
01
60% of US employees say HR should be involved when bullying occurs — governance expectation rate from Workhuman's employee experience research on bullying/harassment
02
71% of organizations worldwide report having a formal process or channel for reporting misconduct — compliance channel adoption rate from Deloitte human capital reporting
Interpretation
Organizational Controls Interpretation
With 71% of organizations worldwide reporting formal reporting channels for misconduct, it is clear that strong organizational controls are taking hold, yet the fact that only 60% of US employees expect HR involvement shows there is still a gap between process availability and how people believe bullying should be governed.
04 · Category
Economic Cost6 stats
01
Workers who experienced workplace bullying are 1.5x more likely to report reduced productivity — relative productivity impact estimate from a systematic review
02
The global workplace bullying market for HR case management/training solutions is estimated at $2.8 billion in 2023 — market size estimate relevant to prevention/management technology spend
03
Europe’s direct economic costs of bullying at work are estimated at €20 billion annually — cost estimate reported in a European Commission context document
04
US employers lose $200 billion per year due to workplace stress-related conditions, with bullying/harassment identified as a contributor — estimated macro cost in US stress burden report
05
In the UK, estimates suggest bullying and harassment costs organizations £2.3 billion per year — economic cost estimate in trade/commissioned analysis
06
Workplace bullying is associated with increased absenteeism; victims take 4.6 more absence days per year than non-victims — estimate from an empirical study
Interpretation
Economic Cost Interpretation
From an Economic Cost perspective, workplace bullying is linked to measurable financial drag, including 1.5 times higher odds of reduced productivity and added absenteeism of 4.6 days per year for victims, while direct annual losses reach about €20 billion in Europe and up to £2.3 billion in the UK.
05 · Category
Health & Impact7 stats
01
Bullying victims show a 0.59 standard deviation increase in psychological distress compared with non-victims — standardized effect size from a meta-analysis
02
Workplace bullying increases risk of self-reported ill health by 1.44 (relative risk) — pooled effect size from a systematic review
03
Meta-analysis evidence links workplace bullying with increased work-related strain and psychosocial outcomes with an average correlation of r=0.30 — pooled relationship strength (peer-reviewed meta-analysis)
04
Victims of workplace bullying report an average reduction in perceived self-esteem of 0.50 standard deviations — standardized mean difference reported in a meta-analysis
05
Bullied workers have a 1.7x increased risk of musculoskeletal symptoms — pooled finding from a systematic review (workplace bullying health effects)
06
Bullying victims experience 2.3x higher odds of burnout — pooled odds ratio from a meta-analysis
07
Bullying is associated with a 1.8x higher odds of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) — effect estimate from a peer-reviewed review
Interpretation
Health & Impact Interpretation
Workplace bullying strongly harms health, with victims showing a 0.59 standard deviation increase in psychological distress and a 2.3x higher odds of burnout, while also facing elevated risks of ill health and musculoskeletal symptoms, underscoring its serious Health and Impact across both mental and physical well-being.
06 · Category
Trends & Drivers1 stats
01
76% of HR professionals report increased attention to employee well-being and psychological safety post-2020 — policy/priority trend relevant to bullying prevention
Interpretation
Trends & Drivers Interpretation
Since 2020, 76% of HR professionals say attention to employee well-being and psychological safety has increased, showing that broader shifts in workplace care are driving stronger momentum for bullying prevention under Trends and Drivers.
More related reading
07 · Category
Prevalence & Incidence1 stats
01
20% of surveyed US workers reported experiencing some form of workplace bullying or harassment during the past year (2014–2018 NHIS analysis referenced in NIOSH report)
Interpretation
Prevalence & Incidence Interpretation
In the prevalence and incidence category, 20% of surveyed US workers reported experiencing some form of workplace bullying or harassment in the past year, showing that such harm is common enough to affect one in five workers.
08 · Category
Health Impacts2 stats
01
Workplace bullying was associated with increased PTSD symptom severity (standardized mean difference 0.67) in a meta-analysis
02
A systematic review found workplace bullying increased odds of common mental disorders by 1.29 (pooled odds ratio)
Interpretation
Health Impacts Interpretation
In the Health Impacts category, workplace bullying is linked to worse mental health outcomes, including a 0.67 standardized mean difference increase in PTSD symptom severity and a 1.29 pooled odds ratio rise in common mental disorders.
09 · Category
Reporting & Governance1 stats
01
In a global workplace survey, 60% of employees reported they would not report misconduct if they believed it would have negative consequences for them
Interpretation
Reporting & Governance Interpretation
In the reporting and governance context, 60% of employees say they would not report misconduct if they feared negative consequences, showing that fear of repercussions is a major barrier to effective workplace bullying reporting.
10 · Category
Cost Analysis4 stats
01
Companies with high levels of workplace bullying/harassment experience higher turnover; turnover intent was 1.5x higher among victims (model-based estimate reported in a peer-reviewed study)
02
In a systematic review, workplace bullying was associated with increased work absence (effect size: standardized mean difference 0.42)
03
In a meta-analysis, workplace bullying was associated with increased turnover intentions (standardized effect size 0.44)
04
The UK estimated economic cost of bullying/harassment to employers and individuals at £2.3 billion per year (Commissioned analysis year 2022)
Interpretation
Cost Analysis Interpretation
From a Cost Analysis perspective, workplace bullying is not just a wellbeing issue because victims are estimated to have 1.5 times higher turnover intent and bullying also links to increased absence and turnover intentions, while the UK alone estimates the total annual economic cost to employers and individuals is £2.3 billion.
11 · Category
Industry Trends2 stats
01
In the US, NIOSH reported that workplace bullying and harassment are associated with increased risk for adverse health outcomes based on NHIS surveillance data analysis
02
In the ILO/WHO/ITUC context for violence and harassment, 4 in 10 workers are affected by psychological harassment (global estimate stated)
Interpretation
Industry Trends Interpretation
Industry trends show that in the US, NIOSH links workplace bullying and harassment to higher risk of adverse health outcomes, and globally 4 in 10 workers face psychological harassment, underscoring how widespread harassment is becoming a major occupational health issue rather than an isolated workplace problem.
Reference
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
APA
Diana Reeves. (2026, February 13). Workplace Bullying Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/workplace-bullying-statistics
MLA
Diana Reeves. "Workplace Bullying Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/workplace-bullying-statistics.
Chicago
Diana Reeves. 2026. "Workplace Bullying Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/workplace-bullying-statistics.
Sources & references
28 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level
+10 additional datasets cited (not shown individually)