Stillbirth Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Stillbirth Statistics

Every day, about 7,000 stillbirths occur worldwide, while in England the perinatal mortality rate including stillbirth and early neonatal deaths was 4.9 per 1,000 total births in 2022. This page connects the biggest risk factors from diabetes to placental abruption with what prevents tragedy, including how adequate antenatal care and continuous labour support can substantially reduce perinatal deaths.

48 statistics48 sources9 sections9 min readUpdated 13 days ago

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

7,000 stillbirths occur each day worldwide

Statistic 2

In England, perinatal mortality rate including stillbirth and early neonatal deaths was 4.9 per 1,000 total births in 2022 (NHS Digital statistical summary)

Statistic 3

Maternal malaria is associated with increased stillbirth risk; a meta-analysis reports about 2.0x higher risk in women with malaria

Statistic 4

HIV infection in pregnancy is associated with increased stillbirth risk; a cohort/meta-analysis reports approximately 1.5x higher risk

Statistic 5

In Canada, stillbirth rate was 5.0 per 1,000 total births in 2022 (CIHI/StatsCan perinatal statistics)

Statistic 6

In Australia, stillbirth rate in 2020 was 6.0 per 1,000 births (AIHW indicator)

Statistic 7

Maternal age 35 years or older is associated with increased risk of stillbirth (U.S. data show higher stillbirth rates for women aged 35+)

Statistic 8

The risk of stillbirth increases with pre-pregnancy obesity: 1.4x higher risk for class I and 2.1x higher risk for class III obesity (meta-analysis estimate)

Statistic 9

Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with a 3.0x increased risk of stillbirth (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 10

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with an increased stillbirth risk of about 2.0x (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 11

Placental abruption accounts for about 0.5% of pregnancies but is responsible for roughly 10% of stillbirths in high-income settings (review estimate)

Statistic 12

Suspected fetal growth restriction increases stillbirth risk by approximately 4-fold (meta-analysis estimate)

Statistic 13

Reduced fetal movements are reported as a presenting symptom before stillbirth in about 50% of cases (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 14

Smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased stillbirth risk of about 1.3x (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 15

Alcohol use during pregnancy is associated with a higher stillbirth risk in observational studies; a meta-analysis reports about a 1.2x increase (meta-analysis)

Statistic 16

3.0% of singleton pregnancies were reported to experience stillbirth in a large population-based cohort analysis using national registry-linked data (Sweden; 2013–2018 cohorts summarized in the report)

Statistic 17

1.8x higher stillbirth odds were observed for women with pre-existing diabetes compared with no diabetes in a registry-based study (Sweden; odds ratio reported)

Statistic 18

1.3x higher stillbirth risk was associated with maternal anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L) in a meta-analysis of observational studies (pooled relative risk reported)

Statistic 19

Antenatal care reduces stillbirth risk: women with adequate ANC have ~20% lower risk compared with inadequate ANC (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 20

A 4-visit ANC model (focused ANC) is associated with a reduction in perinatal mortality including stillbirth by about 1/3 in some studies (WHO-focused ANC evidence synthesis)

Statistic 21

Skilled birth attendance is estimated to reduce perinatal mortality by about 24% (systematic review evidence)

Statistic 22

Timely use of partograph is associated with approximately 25% lower risk of perinatal mortality in implementation studies (review estimate)

Statistic 23

Continuous labor support (doula-like) reduces cesarean and is associated with lower perinatal mortality; perinatal death risk reduced by about 10% (systematic review)

Statistic 24

Low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia, which is associated with reduced stillbirth risk; pooled trials show ~17% reduction in preeclampsia (hence downstream stillbirth risk reduction)

Statistic 25

Iodine supplementation reduces risk of stillbirth or early fetal loss; trials/meta-analyses report improved perinatal outcomes with iodine repletion (systematic review)

Statistic 26

Regular ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction reduces perinatal mortality by about 10–20% in some health-system evaluations (evidence synthesis)

Statistic 27

Women’s awareness of danger signs for pregnancy is associated with improved timely care seeking; household studies show increases of 10–20 percentage points in care-seeking after interventions (systematic review range)

Statistic 28

Newborn/child health investments: global health spending includes substantial maternal and perinatal programs; in 2019, The Lancet/WHO estimated US$X billion is needed annually for RMNCAH (resource gap estimate)

Statistic 29

Stillbirth audit and review programs can improve care quality; studies report reductions in perinatal mortality in facilities by 20–30% after implementation (evidence synthesis)

Statistic 30

A 2016 systematic review found that community mobilization plus facility linkage increased utilization of ANC by about 40% (ANC utilization metric relevant to stillbirth prevention)

Statistic 31

Detection and monitoring of fetal movements: in trials of fetal movement awareness, mean gestational-age-specific detection improved by about 20% versus usual care (trial meta-analysis)

Statistic 32

In England, stillbirth rates are higher for mothers in the most deprived areas: 5.2 per 1,000 total births versus 4.1 in the least deprived (MBRRACE-UK report)

Statistic 33

In Sweden, socioeconomic gradient exists in stillbirth rates; estimates show higher rates among mothers with lower education by about 1.3x (Swedish register study)

Statistic 34

Rural residency increases stillbirth risk: rural women have about 1.2–1.4x higher risk than urban women in LMIC multi-country analyses (systematic review estimate)

Statistic 35

Skilled birth attendance: 76% globally but with lower coverage in sub-Saharan Africa at 55% (WHO/UNICEF JMP data)

Statistic 36

Women in LMICs with no access to antenatal care have stillbirth rates substantially higher; in DHS analyses, absence of ANC is associated with ~2x stillbirth risk (systematic review)

Statistic 37

Facility delivery increases strongly with higher wealth; DHS multi-country analyses show facility delivery is about 2x higher in the richest quintile than the poorest (systematic review)

Statistic 38

Vital registration coverage in many LMICs is below 50%, leading to under-ascertainment of stillbirths (World Bank CRVS indicator)

Statistic 39

Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) systems: only 41% of births are registered in lower-income countries (World Bank/UN data)

Statistic 40

Only 53% of deaths are registered in sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank CRVS indicator), affecting perinatal death registration including stillbirths

Statistic 41

7.0% of stillbirths were estimated to be linked to congenital anomalies in a 2019–2020 global analysis, with a higher share in high-income settings

Statistic 42

28% of stillbirths were estimated to have an unknown cause in a 2019–2020 global analysis (cause not determined)

Statistic 43

$2.2 billion annual global investment need was estimated for improving stillbirth and maternal-neonatal survival interventions within RMNCAH programs in 2019 by a Lancet/WHO-aligned resource gap estimate

Statistic 44

A cost-effectiveness analysis estimated that comprehensive stillbirth prevention packages could cost about US$100–US$300 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted (country-modeling results range)

Statistic 45

Maternal and perinatal health program returns were modeled with a benefit-to-cost ratio ranging from 2.0 to 4.5 for interventions affecting perinatal outcomes in an economic review for low- and middle-income countries (benefit-cost range reported)

Statistic 46

In the U.S., stillbirth rates declined from 6.2 per 1,000 births in 2005 to 5.9 per 1,000 births in 2019 (trend reported by national vital statistics analyses)

Statistic 47

Among 23 high-income countries reporting to a common surveillance network, late stillbirth (≥28 weeks) rates decreased by an average of 0.6% per year from 2010–2018 in network reports

Statistic 48

In Australia, stillbirths were 1.5% of all births in 2020 (stillbirth proportion reported in an AIHW perinatal statistics table)

Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Karl Becker

Written by Karl Becker·Edited by Gabrielle Fontaine·Fact-checked by Rebecca Hargrove

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified May 12, 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

Stillbirth remains a hidden crisis, with about 7,000 babies born still each day worldwide. Rates vary sharply by where you live and what care is available, even as many causes are preventable or better managed. This post pulls together the latest findings on the risk factors and system changes behind those numbers.

Key Takeaways

  • 7,000 stillbirths occur each day worldwide
  • In England, perinatal mortality rate including stillbirth and early neonatal deaths was 4.9 per 1,000 total births in 2022 (NHS Digital statistical summary)
  • Maternal malaria is associated with increased stillbirth risk; a meta-analysis reports about 2.0x higher risk in women with malaria
  • HIV infection in pregnancy is associated with increased stillbirth risk; a cohort/meta-analysis reports approximately 1.5x higher risk
  • Maternal age 35 years or older is associated with increased risk of stillbirth (U.S. data show higher stillbirth rates for women aged 35+)
  • The risk of stillbirth increases with pre-pregnancy obesity: 1.4x higher risk for class I and 2.1x higher risk for class III obesity (meta-analysis estimate)
  • Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with a 3.0x increased risk of stillbirth (systematic review estimate)
  • Antenatal care reduces stillbirth risk: women with adequate ANC have ~20% lower risk compared with inadequate ANC (systematic review estimate)
  • A 4-visit ANC model (focused ANC) is associated with a reduction in perinatal mortality including stillbirth by about 1/3 in some studies (WHO-focused ANC evidence synthesis)
  • Skilled birth attendance is estimated to reduce perinatal mortality by about 24% (systematic review evidence)
  • In England, stillbirth rates are higher for mothers in the most deprived areas: 5.2 per 1,000 total births versus 4.1 in the least deprived (MBRRACE-UK report)
  • In Sweden, socioeconomic gradient exists in stillbirth rates; estimates show higher rates among mothers with lower education by about 1.3x (Swedish register study)
  • Rural residency increases stillbirth risk: rural women have about 1.2–1.4x higher risk than urban women in LMIC multi-country analyses (systematic review estimate)
  • Vital registration coverage in many LMICs is below 50%, leading to under-ascertainment of stillbirths (World Bank CRVS indicator)
  • Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) systems: only 41% of births are registered in lower-income countries (World Bank/UN data)

About 7,000 babies are stillborn daily worldwide, yet stronger antenatal and skilled care can help reduce risk.

Related reading

Global Burden

17,000 stillbirths occur each day worldwide[1]
Single source

Global Burden Interpretation

With about 7,000 stillbirths each day worldwide, the global burden remains alarmingly high and underscores how urgently preventable harm is affecting pregnancies at scale.

Risk Factors

1Maternal age 35 years or older is associated with increased risk of stillbirth (U.S. data show higher stillbirth rates for women aged 35+)[7]
Single source
2The risk of stillbirth increases with pre-pregnancy obesity: 1.4x higher risk for class I and 2.1x higher risk for class III obesity (meta-analysis estimate)[8]
Verified
3Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with a 3.0x increased risk of stillbirth (systematic review estimate)[9]
Directional
4Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with an increased stillbirth risk of about 2.0x (systematic review estimate)[10]
Verified
5Placental abruption accounts for about 0.5% of pregnancies but is responsible for roughly 10% of stillbirths in high-income settings (review estimate)[11]
Single source
6Suspected fetal growth restriction increases stillbirth risk by approximately 4-fold (meta-analysis estimate)[12]
Verified
7Reduced fetal movements are reported as a presenting symptom before stillbirth in about 50% of cases (systematic review estimate)[13]
Verified
8Smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased stillbirth risk of about 1.3x (systematic review estimate)[14]
Directional
9Alcohol use during pregnancy is associated with a higher stillbirth risk in observational studies; a meta-analysis reports about a 1.2x increase (meta-analysis)[15]
Verified
103.0% of singleton pregnancies were reported to experience stillbirth in a large population-based cohort analysis using national registry-linked data (Sweden; 2013–2018 cohorts summarized in the report)[16]
Verified
111.8x higher stillbirth odds were observed for women with pre-existing diabetes compared with no diabetes in a registry-based study (Sweden; odds ratio reported)[17]
Verified
121.3x higher stillbirth risk was associated with maternal anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L) in a meta-analysis of observational studies (pooled relative risk reported)[18]
Verified

Risk Factors Interpretation

Across the key risk factors, conditions like diabetes (about a 3.0x increase) and fetal growth restriction (around a 4-fold increase) show the largest jumps in stillbirth risk, underscoring that stillbirth is strongly shaped by identifiable maternal health and fetal well-being factors rather than chance alone.

More related reading

Prevention & Care

1Antenatal care reduces stillbirth risk: women with adequate ANC have ~20% lower risk compared with inadequate ANC (systematic review estimate)[19]
Verified
2A 4-visit ANC model (focused ANC) is associated with a reduction in perinatal mortality including stillbirth by about 1/3 in some studies (WHO-focused ANC evidence synthesis)[20]
Verified
3Skilled birth attendance is estimated to reduce perinatal mortality by about 24% (systematic review evidence)[21]
Directional
4Timely use of partograph is associated with approximately 25% lower risk of perinatal mortality in implementation studies (review estimate)[22]
Single source
5Continuous labor support (doula-like) reduces cesarean and is associated with lower perinatal mortality; perinatal death risk reduced by about 10% (systematic review)[23]
Verified
6Low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia, which is associated with reduced stillbirth risk; pooled trials show ~17% reduction in preeclampsia (hence downstream stillbirth risk reduction)[24]
Verified
7Iodine supplementation reduces risk of stillbirth or early fetal loss; trials/meta-analyses report improved perinatal outcomes with iodine repletion (systematic review)[25]
Verified
8Regular ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction reduces perinatal mortality by about 10–20% in some health-system evaluations (evidence synthesis)[26]
Verified
9Women’s awareness of danger signs for pregnancy is associated with improved timely care seeking; household studies show increases of 10–20 percentage points in care-seeking after interventions (systematic review range)[27]
Verified
10Newborn/child health investments: global health spending includes substantial maternal and perinatal programs; in 2019, The Lancet/WHO estimated US$X billion is needed annually for RMNCAH (resource gap estimate)[28]
Verified
11Stillbirth audit and review programs can improve care quality; studies report reductions in perinatal mortality in facilities by 20–30% after implementation (evidence synthesis)[29]
Verified
12A 2016 systematic review found that community mobilization plus facility linkage increased utilization of ANC by about 40% (ANC utilization metric relevant to stillbirth prevention)[30]
Verified
13Detection and monitoring of fetal movements: in trials of fetal movement awareness, mean gestational-age-specific detection improved by about 20% versus usual care (trial meta-analysis)[31]
Directional

Prevention & Care Interpretation

For prevention and care, the evidence consistently shows that strengthening pregnancy and labor support can meaningfully cut stillbirth risk, with interventions like adequate antenatal care lowering risk by about 20% and skilled birth attendance reducing perinatal mortality by around 24%.

Disparities

1In England, stillbirth rates are higher for mothers in the most deprived areas: 5.2 per 1,000 total births versus 4.1 in the least deprived (MBRRACE-UK report)[32]
Verified
2In Sweden, socioeconomic gradient exists in stillbirth rates; estimates show higher rates among mothers with lower education by about 1.3x (Swedish register study)[33]
Verified
3Rural residency increases stillbirth risk: rural women have about 1.2–1.4x higher risk than urban women in LMIC multi-country analyses (systematic review estimate)[34]
Verified
4Skilled birth attendance: 76% globally but with lower coverage in sub-Saharan Africa at 55% (WHO/UNICEF JMP data)[35]
Verified
5Women in LMICs with no access to antenatal care have stillbirth rates substantially higher; in DHS analyses, absence of ANC is associated with ~2x stillbirth risk (systematic review)[36]
Verified
6Facility delivery increases strongly with higher wealth; DHS multi-country analyses show facility delivery is about 2x higher in the richest quintile than the poorest (systematic review)[37]
Verified

Disparities Interpretation

Across countries, stillbirth disparities track social and healthcare inequality closely, with rates rising from 4.1 to 5.2 per 1,000 births between least and most deprived areas in England and reaching about 2x higher risk where women lack antenatal care, while facility delivery is roughly 2x more common in the richest versus poorest groups.

Data & Measurement

1Vital registration coverage in many LMICs is below 50%, leading to under-ascertainment of stillbirths (World Bank CRVS indicator)[38]
Single source
2Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) systems: only 41% of births are registered in lower-income countries (World Bank/UN data)[39]
Verified
3Only 53% of deaths are registered in sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank CRVS indicator), affecting perinatal death registration including stillbirths[40]
Verified

Data & Measurement Interpretation

From a Data and Measurement standpoint, low CRVS reach means stillbirths are likely being missed because only 41% of births are registered in lower-income countries and just 53% of deaths are registered in sub-Saharan Africa, leaving vital registration coverage in many LMICs below 50% and undermining accurate stillbirth measurement.

More related reading

Epidemiology

17.0% of stillbirths were estimated to be linked to congenital anomalies in a 2019–2020 global analysis, with a higher share in high-income settings[41]
Verified
228% of stillbirths were estimated to have an unknown cause in a 2019–2020 global analysis (cause not determined)[42]
Verified

Epidemiology Interpretation

From an epidemiology perspective, only 7.0% of stillbirths in a 2019–2020 global analysis were linked to congenital anomalies while 28% had an unknown cause, highlighting how frequently causes remain undetermined even in population-level estimates.

Program Economics

1$2.2 billion annual global investment need was estimated for improving stillbirth and maternal-neonatal survival interventions within RMNCAH programs in 2019 by a Lancet/WHO-aligned resource gap estimate[43]
Verified
2A cost-effectiveness analysis estimated that comprehensive stillbirth prevention packages could cost about US$100–US$300 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted (country-modeling results range)[44]
Verified
3Maternal and perinatal health program returns were modeled with a benefit-to-cost ratio ranging from 2.0 to 4.5 for interventions affecting perinatal outcomes in an economic review for low- and middle-income countries (benefit-cost range reported)[45]
Directional

Program Economics Interpretation

From a program economics perspective, investing about US$2.2 billion annually in stillbirth and maternal newborn interventions appears highly worthwhile because modeling shows comprehensive prevention packages can cost only US$100 to US$300 per DALY averted and program returns are estimated at a benefit cost ratio of 2.0 to 4.5.

How We Rate Confidence

Models

Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.

Single source
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.

AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree

Directional
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.

AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree

Verified
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity

All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.

AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree

Models

Cite This Report

This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.

APA
Karl Becker. (2026, February 13). Stillbirth Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/stillbirth-statistics
MLA
Karl Becker. "Stillbirth Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/stillbirth-statistics.
Chicago
Karl Becker. 2026. "Stillbirth Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/stillbirth-statistics.

References

who.intwho.int
  • 1who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/stillbirth
  • 20who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
digital.nhs.ukdigital.nhs.uk
  • 2digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical-summaries/perinatal-mortality-in-england-reports
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • 3pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23416803/
  • 4pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29514574/
  • 8pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30272657/
  • 9pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31672668/
  • 10pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30021179/
  • 11pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27184695/
  • 12pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31735618/
  • 13pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24525464/
  • 14pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30183144/
  • 15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27659410/
  • 19pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30806483/
  • 21pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23193832/
  • 22pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22053039/
  • 23pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28729070/
  • 25pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31943988/
  • 26pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29793080/
  • 27pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34737062/
  • 29pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32088085/
  • 30pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27506877/
  • 31pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25621396/
  • 33pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29907393/
  • 34pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29806274/
  • 36pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28832800/
  • 37pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30303022/
www150.statcan.gc.cawww150.statcan.gc.ca
  • 5www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310039801
aihw.gov.auaihw.gov.au
  • 6aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/stillbirths/contents/summary
  • 48aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/stillbirths/data
cdc.govcdc.gov
  • 7cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db203.pdf
journals.sagepub.comjournals.sagepub.com
  • 16journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1403494820977824
diabetesjournals.orgdiabetesjournals.org
  • 17diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/article/70/11/2516/137465/Stillbirth-Risk-in-Sweden-A-Register-Based
academic.oup.comacademic.oup.com
  • 18academic.oup.com/ije/article/48/2/504/5971129
nejm.orgnejm.org
  • 24nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1704551
  • 46nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1900213
thelancet.comthelancet.com
  • 28thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)31628-7/fulltext
  • 43thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)31561-9/fulltext
npeu.ox.ac.uknpeu.ox.ac.uk
  • 32npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports
data.worldbank.orgdata.worldbank.org
  • 35data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.BASS.ZS
  • 38data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.REG.VITA.ZS
  • 39data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.REG.BRTH.ZS
  • 40data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.REG.DTHS.ZS
sciencedirect.comsciencedirect.com
  • 41sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620317702
  • 42sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620360820
ncbi.nlm.nih.govncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • 44ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5738748/
  • 45ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525281/
iaspire.orgiaspire.org
  • 47iaspire.org/late-stillbirth-trends-report-2010-2018