Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Computer Cloud Backup Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Cybersecurity Information Security

Top 10 Best Computer Cloud Backup Services of 2026

Compare computer cloud backup services for businesses, including iDrive. Review tradeoffs for storage, restore, and admin needs.

17 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Computer cloud backup services transfer endpoint data to offsite storage and manage restore workflows when drives fail or ransomware hits. This ranked review helps analysts and operators compare provider mechanisms like endpoint agent backup, version retention, and ransomware recovery readiness against tradeoffs in bandwidth cost, restore time, and administrative control via RBAC and audit logs, including options that fit consumer PCs through managed MSP deployments.

Veeam is the best pick for infrastructure teams that need controlled recovery with consistent workflows, because Veeam Orchestrated Restore guides policy-driven point-in-time restores across workloads, while iDrive fits smaller IT teams better since its image-based restore workflows make full-system recovery straightforward to manage.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Veeam

Veeam Orchestrated Restore lets teams run guided, policy-controlled recovery workflows with consistent rollback points.

Best for: Fits when infrastructure teams need controlled recovery for VMware or Hyper-V plus cloud repositories.

2

iDrive

Editor pick

Full-system recovery support via image-based backup and restore workflows for crashed computers.

Best for: Fits when a small IT team needs dependable endpoint backup and straightforward restore management.

3

Carbonite

Editor pick

Managed endpoint backup administration with centralized reporting on backup status and restore readiness.

Best for: Fits when IT teams need consistent endpoint backup governance and reliable restore paths across many Windows devices.

Comparison Table

1
VeeamBest overall
enterprise_vendor
9.1/10
Overall
2
enterprise_vendor
8.7/10
Overall
3
enterprise_vendor
8.6/10
Overall
4
enterprise_vendor
8.5/10
Overall
5
enterprise_vendor
8.0/10
Overall
6
enterprise_vendor
7.9/10
Overall
7
enterprise_vendor
7.4/10
Overall
8
enterprise_vendor
7.1/10
Overall
9
enterprise_vendor
6.9/10
Overall
10
enterprise_vendor
6.5/10
Overall
#1

Veeam

enterprise_vendor

Backup and recovery solutions including cloud backup for endpoints and virtual machines.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use9.2/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Veeam Orchestrated Restore lets teams run guided, policy-controlled recovery workflows with consistent rollback points.

Veeam delivers cloud backup that ties backup job configuration, backup repository management, and restore orchestration into one operational model. Administration is built around job templates, centralized monitoring, and role-based access that supports audit-friendly oversight across backup operators and infrastructure owners. Integration depth is strongest where VMware and Hyper-V estates feed Veeam-managed backups into cloud repositories with predictable scheduling and retention enforcement. API and automation hooks help standardize provisioning of jobs and policies when multiple teams manage different workload groups.

A practical tradeoff is that effective governance still requires backup discipline around restore testing cadence and repository capacity planning. Veeam fits best when infrastructure teams need controlled recovery paths for mixed environments and want repeatable operations across sites and tenants. It also suits organizations that expect frequent workload changes and need automation to keep backup coverage aligned with new servers and storage targets.

Pros
  • +Restore workflow supports point-in-time recovery across workloads
  • +Central monitoring and reporting reduce backup visibility gaps
  • +RBAC and audit-ready control paths support multi-admin governance
  • +Automation and API support repeatable job and policy changes
Cons
  • –Restore testing discipline takes ongoing operational effort
  • –Cloud repository capacity planning affects job throughput and stability
  • –Multi-environment deployments require careful initial design
  • –Complex estates may need specialized backup operations staffing
Use scenarios
  • VMware infrastructure teams

    Restore whole workloads after outages

    Faster service recovery

  • Hybrid IT operations

    Manage backups across sites and clouds

    Consistent backup coverage

Show 1 more scenario
  • Backup governance leads

    Enforce access and accountability

    Tighter administrative control

    RBAC plus monitoring and reporting supports controlled administration and clearer operational ownership boundaries.

Best for: Fits when infrastructure teams need controlled recovery for VMware or Hyper-V plus cloud repositories.

#2

iDrive

enterprise_vendor

Online backup service for PCs, Macs, and mobile devices with cloud storage.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Full-system recovery support via image-based backup and restore workflows for crashed computers.

iDrive suits organizations and IT-managed households that need ongoing protection for laptops and desktops, not just occasional file copies. The service uses a backup agent installed per computer, then applies retention and versioning settings to produce multiple restore points over time. Central management in the console helps track backup status and guide restores without requiring users to manage local storage media.

A clear tradeoff is governance depth, since RBAC granularity and audit logging controls do not match what enterprise backup suites provide. iDrive fits best when teams want standardized endpoint protection and periodic restore capability, such as recovering individual folders after ransomware activity or reinstating a workstation after drive failure.

Pros
  • +Central console supports restore workflows for multiple backed computers
  • +Retention and versioning settings help maintain multiple restore points
  • +Encryption in transit and at rest supports safer backup storage
  • +Schedule-driven backups reduce manual workload on endpoints
Cons
  • –RBAC granularity and audit controls are limited versus enterprise suites
  • –Advanced automation and API extensibility are not as deep as top-tier platforms
Use scenarios
  • Small IT teams

    Manage backups for office workstations

    Faster workstation recovery

  • MSP managing clients

    Standardize backup settings across endpoints

    Lower operational overhead

Show 1 more scenario
  • Operations and finance staff

    Recover key documents after deletion

    Reduced downtime

    File-level restore with versioned history supports restoring earlier document states.

Best for: Fits when a small IT team needs dependable endpoint backup and straightforward restore management.

#3

Carbonite

enterprise_vendor

Cloud backup service for individuals and businesses with automatic computer backup.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Managed endpoint backup administration with centralized reporting on backup status and restore readiness.

Carbonite fits organizations that want backup agents installed on managed endpoints with centralized visibility for backup status and restore readiness. The administration experience supports policy-based scheduling and retention settings, plus recovery paths for file-level restores and full machine recovery scenarios. For teams that coordinate across multiple locations, Carbonite’s console reporting reduces the need for spreadsheet-based tracking of which devices are protected.

A practical tradeoff is that deep integration with non-Windows environments depends on the specific agent footprint deployed, which can create uneven coverage across mixed fleets. Carbonite works best when IT teams want consistent rollout and ongoing governance for endpoint backup at scale rather than building custom automation around raw storage access.

Pros
  • +Central console reporting for backup coverage across managed endpoints
  • +Policy-driven scheduling and retention controls for predictable restore points
  • +Restore workflows built for file-level and full-system recovery scenarios
  • +Managed rollout reduces manual effort during endpoint onboarding
Cons
  • –Agent coverage can lag for non-standard endpoint environments
  • –Advanced automation requires more reliance on admin workflows than custom APIs
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Standardize endpoint backup across branches

    Fewer gaps in protection

  • Helpdesk teams

    Run frequent file restore requests

    Faster user recovery

Show 1 more scenario
  • MSP administrators

    Onboard client endpoints consistently

    Lower admin overhead

    Centralized policy rollout helps apply consistent scheduling and retention across client-managed devices.

Best for: Fits when IT teams need consistent endpoint backup governance and reliable restore paths across many Windows devices.

#4

Backblaze

enterprise_vendor

Cloud storage and computer backup provider offering unlimited backup for personal and business use.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Continuous client-side backup with simple restore paths that prioritize fast recovery over complex policy modeling

Backblaze combines an endpoint backup agent with a managed cloud backup repository for full-system and file-level recovery workflows. The service is built around continuous change capture from the client, then stores restore-ready versions in the cloud with client-side encryption as an option.

Pros
  • +Client encryption option reduces exposure risk during transit and storage
  • +Fast file-level restore workflow fits everyday recovery needs
  • +Continuous background protection reduces reliance on rigid schedules
  • +Clear device inventory and account-based restore management
Cons
  • –Limited RBAC and audit log depth for multi-admin governance
  • –Restore testing and point-in-time options are not as granular as enterprise tools
  • –Fewer API and automation surfaces than backup platforms used at scale
  • –Not designed around agentless or image-based bare-metal restore workflows

Best for: Fits when small to midsize IT teams want reliable endpoint backup with straightforward restores.

#5

CrashPlan

enterprise_vendor

Cloud backup service for small businesses and enterprises with endpoint backup.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Centralized policy management for many endpoint agents, with restore access tied to admin-configured permissions.

CrashPlan handles endpoint and file-level backup by running a backup agent on Windows, macOS, and Linux systems and streaming data to a cloud backup repository. Its distinct operational model is designed around centralized management for multi-device fleets, with consistent backup schedules, retention settings, and restore access controls in one console.

Pros
  • +Central console supports consistent policies across many endpoints
  • +Agent-based file and folder backup fits mixed Windows and Linux fleets
  • +Retention and versioning options support routine restore requests
  • +Restore UX is geared toward locating prior versions quickly
Cons
  • –Deep integration for cloud apps and SaaS workloads is limited
  • –System recovery workflows depend heavily on how endpoints were protected
  • –Bandwidth and storage planning are required for steady deduped throughput
  • –Granular RBAC and audit logging are not as fine-grained as enterprise suites

Best for: Fits when organizations need managed endpoint file backup with predictable restore versions and centralized policy control.

#6

N-able

enterprise_vendor

Managed service provider platform delivering cloud backup and disaster recovery services.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Backup task orchestration from the N-able managed console with tenant-scoped policy rollouts and traceable admin actions.

N-able delivers cloud backup for managed service providers through agent-based protection and centralized administration. Teams typically use it for scheduled endpoint backup workflows, restore testing, and consistent retention policy enforcement across many customer environments.

Pros
  • +Central console for multi-tenant backup administration
  • +Role-based access and audit logs for backup changes
  • +Automation support for provisioning and policy rollout
  • +Restore-focused operations that fit MSP workflows
Cons
  • –Endpoint coverage depends on supported OS and agent footprint
  • –Granular restore testing workflows can require admin scripting
  • –Advanced retention edge cases need careful policy design
  • –Integration depth is strongest within the N-able ecosystem

Best for: Fits when MSPs need centrally governed endpoint backup with automation and audit trails across many tenants.

#7

Barracuda Networks

enterprise_vendor

Security and backup provider offering cloud-to-cloud backup and dedicated backup appliances.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Barracuda’s unified administration approach connects backup policy operations with its security management workflows.

Barracuda Networks pairs cloud backup with its broader protection stack, which matters for teams already standardizing on Barracuda for security and data management.

Pros
  • +Centralized policy management aligns backup operations with enterprise governance
  • +Recovery workflows fit both point-in-time restore needs and disaster recovery planning
  • +Integration with Barracuda’s security ecosystem reduces admin fragmentation
  • +Retention controls support consistent rollback windows across workloads
Cons
  • –Native automation and API depth is less transparent than some cloud-first peers
  • –Cloud backup setup and tuning demand active planning for successful operations
  • –Restore testing workflows may require extra operational effort in complex estates
  • –Cross-team delegation can feel constrained without clear RBAC visibility

Best for: Fits when mid-market to enterprise teams want backup operations aligned with Barracuda security governance.

#8

Datto

enterprise_vendor

Backup and disaster recovery solutions including cloud backup for endpoints.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

Datto appliance coordinated recovery workflows that pair local availability with cloud retention for repeatable disaster recovery execution.

Datto focuses on managed backup and recovery workflows for business endpoints and servers, with an emphasis on predictable restore paths and operational governance. Its backup stack supports local appliance based repositories alongside cloud storage, which helps teams run disaster recovery without treating recovery as a separate project.

Pros
  • +Local appliance plus cloud storage layout supports faster recovery planning
  • +Centralized policy management standardizes backup schedules and retention across tenants
  • +Restore workflows are operationally oriented around recovery execution, not just file retrieval
  • +Agent based data capture fits mixed endpoint and server footprints
Cons
  • –Initial deployment and ongoing tuning benefit from partner or managed services involvement
  • –Restore testing and recovery validation require consistent operational discipline
  • –Granular control for unusual data sets can take additional configuration
  • –Reporting depth depends on the specific deployment components in use

Best for: Fits when organizations need managed backup and recovery with appliance assisted storage and hands-on governance.

#9

Axcient

enterprise_vendor

Cloud backup and disaster recovery service provider for SMBs and MSPs.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Axcient’s managed recovery execution and incident-focused restore workflow.

Axcient runs managed cloud backup and recovery services that combine agent-based backup with vendor-led restore support. Teams use its backup management workflow to define retention rules, handle server and endpoint protection, and recover workloads after ransomware events.

Pros
  • +Managed restore workflow reduces recovery downtime during incidents
  • +Retention policy management supports controlled versioning windows
  • +Ransomware-focused recovery guidance for common escalation paths
  • +Policy-driven protection for servers and endpoints through an agent
Cons
  • –Governance requires consistent policy setup across protected assets
  • –Restore testing scheduling can feel admin-heavy without standard runbooks
  • –Automation relies more on Axcient management than direct repository control
  • –Advanced integration coverage varies by workload type and environment

Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need managed backup governance and incident-ready restore support.

#10

Arcserve

enterprise_vendor

Data protection and cloud backup solutions for businesses of all sizes.

6.5/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Arcserve’s agent-driven restore workflow supports both file-level and full-system recovery from the same operational policy set.

Arcserve fits organizations that need managed backup for mixed server estates and that want consistent recovery workflows across on-prem and cloud destinations. Core capabilities center on backup agents, scheduled and incremental operations, and restore paths for file-level and full-system recoveries.

Pros
  • +Centralized job scheduling and policy management for large server fleets
  • +Restore tooling covers both file-level recovery and full-system recovery workflows
  • +Retention policy controls support predictable version history for recovery operations
  • +Encryption options cover data at rest and encryption in transit
Cons
  • –API and automation surface is not geared toward script-first orchestration
  • –RBAC granularity for delegated administration can feel limited
  • –Cloud destination configuration takes more planning than single-tenant backup tools
  • –Restore performance depends heavily on repository throughput and network

Best for: Fits when mid-market IT teams need managed backup plus consistent recovery procedures for servers.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 computer cloud backup, Veeam stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Veeam

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Computer Cloud Backup

Which services provide API access for backup policy automation and configuration changes?
N-able supports managed console workflows that tie into its broader ecosystem, which is typically where automation and orchestration hooks show up. Veeam offers API access to accelerate backup lifecycle changes across workloads, and its orchestration targets consistent restore points. Axcient centers automation around its management layer so policies and recovery tests can be coordinated through supporting interfaces.
How does SSO and role-based admin access work for cloud backup consoles?
N-able anchors governance in role-based console access and pairs it with audit trails for administrative actions. Veeam’s management model focuses on workload recovery workflows and policy control, so admin delegation is handled through its platform permissions tied to restore operations. Arcserve centralizes administration for retention configuration and operational reporting, which supports controlled access across backup jobs and restore activity.
How should data migration be handled when switching from one cloud backup vendor to another?
Backblaze keeps restore-ready versions in its cloud repository based on continuous client capture, so migration planning has to account for existing restore history continuity. Barracuda emphasizes policy-driven retention and recovery scenarios, so the migration work usually maps existing retention behavior into its backup policy model. Datto runs managed recovery workflows that coordinate local appliance storage with cloud retention, which changes the migration approach if teams rely on local availability.
When do enterprises need full-system recovery instead of file and folder restore, and which services cover that?
iDrive supports image-based backup and restore workflows for crashed computers, which makes it a fit when full-system recovery matters. Arcserve supports restore paths for both file-level and full-system recovery from the same operational policy set. Veeam focuses on image-based backup jobs and includes bare-metal recovery support for controlled restore execution.
What breaks if endpoint agents cannot upload continuously, such as during bandwidth throttling or long outages?
Backblaze performs continuous client-side backup, so long outages typically delay the next captured changes and affect the freshness of available restore versions. CrashPlan streams data to a cloud repository from agent configuration, so upload interruptions shift restore point recency toward the last successfully captured versions. iDrive uses scheduled and versioned backups, so restore coverage depends on the most recent completed backup job rather than continuous capture.
Which service model fits organizations that need centralized admin controls across many endpoints or tenants?
N-able targets managed service providers with centralized administration for scheduled endpoint backups, restore testing, and tenant-scoped policy rollouts. CrashPlan also focuses on centralized management for multi-device fleets, including consistent backup schedules and retention settings in one console. Carbonite provides centralized rollout and reporting for endpoint backup coverage on Windows devices, which simplifies operational governance at scale.
Which providers support integrations with existing virtualization and cloud environments for consistent recovery workflows?
Veeam integrates deeply with hypervisors and cloud storage targets, which helps teams move from scheduled backups to point-in-time recovery with consistent governance. Barracuda’s broader protection stack integration matters when backup operations are already aligned with its security-oriented governance workflows. Datto pairs agent-driven capture with appliance coordinated storage, which fits environments that need predictable recovery execution across on-prem and cloud paths.
How do recovery workflows differ between endpoint file restore and infrastructure restore testing?
CrashPlan restores files and folders with version history tied to agent configuration, which supports point-in-time recovery for common workstation or server incidents. Datto coordinates recovery workflows that pair local appliance availability with cloud retention, which changes restore testing from file recovery into disaster recovery execution. Veeam provides end-to-end restore workflows, including tested restore points and bare-metal recovery support for infrastructure-level recovery testing.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Computer Cloud Backup

We separate computer cloud backup options by how they handle retention and restore paths, how much control you get over access and auditability, and how reliably restores work in real time. Look closely at retention and restore testing, then at RBAC and audit log, and finally at throughput during uploads.

Retention and version recovery

Why it matters

Retention and version recovery decide whether you can roll back after a mistake or ransomware event. Without clear version handling, you may only recover a single recent state.

How to check

In the console, open the retention or recovery timeline view and confirm how many restore points you can pick over time. In a demo, change a sample document twice, then confirm you can restore the earlier version you selected.

Restore testing evidence

Why it matters

Restore testing evidence matters because backups only help if restores are practical. It also signals whether the tool validates backups before you rely on them.

How to check

Ask what restore testing the vendor documents for real environments and whether verification is automatic. During evaluation, restore a file you intentionally delete locally and confirm it returns with the expected content, name, and permissions.

RBAC and admin delegation

Why it matters

RBAC and admin delegation determine who can manage backup jobs and view recovered data. Too few roles can force risky sharing of admin access.

How to check

Check the account settings for role options (viewer, backup manager, admin) and whether roles affect what users can restore. In a demo, create a second user with limited permissions and confirm they can’t start jobs or export recovered files.

Audit log for backup actions

Why it matters

An audit log for backup actions helps you track what ran, when it ran, and who initiated changes. That trace is important for incident response and internal governance.

How to check

Look for an audit log section that records job start/stop, policy changes, and restore actions. Ask for a sample export, then confirm the timestamps and actor identity fields are present.

Endpoint client management controls

Why it matters

Endpoint client management controls determine how you onboard computers and keep settings consistent. If onboarding is manual or inconsistent, you’ll miss coverage.

How to check

Show how new devices get added and how policies apply. In the demo, enroll a test laptop and confirm you can assign the same backup policy and see job status without manual reconfiguration.

Upload throughput and job scheduling

Why it matters

Upload throughput and job scheduling affects whether backups finish on time and how they behave during busy hours. Poor handling can leave gaps you only notice after trouble.

How to check

Review job scheduling controls and see whether you can limit bandwidth or set time windows. During a test, upload a large folder and verify how the job progresses while the device is actively used.

Red flags

  • Restore options feel ambiguous, such as only one recent state available
  • Audit records don’t include who initiated changes or restores
  • New devices don’t inherit policies automatically without manual steps

Fit by situation

  • If we need to roll back after accidental edits or malware, prioritize retention and version recovery.
  • If we expect multiple people to manage backups, prioritize RBAC and admin delegation.
  • If we rely on frequent restores during incidents, prioritize restore testing evidence.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.