Key Takeaways
- In 2023, IC3 classified 33% of social engineering scams as 'imposter scams' in their fraud typology (IC3)
- In 2024, Verizon’s Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) found social engineering involved in 17% of breaches (scam-related attack chain)
- Verizon DBIR 2024 reported that phishing accounted for 36% of initial access incidents (scam delivery mechanism)
- In a 2022 study, victims reported an average of 2.5 attempts to contact by scammers before they paid (U.S. survey)
- The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated global cybercrime costs at $8 trillion in 2019 and projected $10.5 trillion by 2025
- A 2022 peer-reviewed paper estimates that online fraud harms consumer welfare significantly; the authors quantify average economic losses per victim at hundreds of dollars (cross-study)
- IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach report (2024) found breaches averaged 277 days to identify and contain
- Mandiant’s 2024 report on social engineering showed that credential theft led to compromise in 24% of observed intrusions (includes scam-related access)
- A 2022 peer-reviewed study found that using machine-learning-based spam filtering reduced successful phishing emails by 90% in controlled experiments
- In the U.K., 2.4 million fraud victims were recorded in 2023, reflecting a large share of reported scam-related harm.
- In 2023, 45% of organizations reported experiencing phishing attempts targeting employees, according to a Microsoft Work Trend Index report.
- In Cloudflare’s 2024 security report, automated attacks comprised 98% of Internet traffic observed on protected endpoints.
- Google’s 2024 Transparency Report states that passkey adoption increased the share of sign-ins protected by phishing-resistant methods (passkeys) across supported accounts.
- In a 2019 peer-reviewed study, security training combined with simulated phishing reduced click rates by 37% compared with control groups.
- In a 2021 NBER working paper, simulated phishing and feedback interventions were associated with measurable reductions in reporting and risky behaviors over time.
From rising social engineering costs to stronger defenses, phishing and fraud remain widespread but protections can meaningfully cut harm.
Tactics & Trends
Tactics & Trends Interpretation
Victim Impact
Victim Impact Interpretation
Cost Analysis
Cost Analysis Interpretation
Mitigation & Defenses
Mitigation & Defenses Interpretation
Consumer Impact
Consumer Impact Interpretation
Attack Patterns
Attack Patterns Interpretation
Mitigation Effectiveness
Mitigation Effectiveness Interpretation
Regulation & Reporting
Regulation & Reporting Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
James Okoro. (2026, February 13). Scam Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/scam-statistics
James Okoro. "Scam Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/scam-statistics.
James Okoro. 2026. "Scam Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/scam-statistics.
References
- 1ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2023_IC3Report.pdf
- 2verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/
- 3verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2024/
- 4papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4214025
- 5csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/191103_CyberCrime_Report.pdf
- 6sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178122000614
- 7ibm.com/reports/data-breach
- 8cloud.google.com/blog/products/management-tools/mandiant-report-2024
- 9ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9908685
- 16ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7522945
- 10nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/who-we-are/publications/377-publications-2024/1230-2023-uk-fraud-the-true-story
- 11microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/security-insider/2024-phishing-attack-survey
- 12cloudflare.com/learning/security/what-is-a-bot/
- 13transparencyreport.google.com/?hl=en&cu=2
- 14ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6708049/
- 15nber.org/papers/w29155
- 17pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63-3.html
- 18actionfraud.police.uk/report-a-fraud
- 19legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/contents/enacted
- 20eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
- 21eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1624/oj







