GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Rare Girl Names Frequency Statistics

Rare girl names have a frequency of occurrence that is significantly lower compared to more common names.

Highlights: Rare Girl Names Frequency Statistics

  • In the United States, only 25 babies were given the rare name 'Zephyrine' in 2018.
  • Only 50 girls in the United States were named ‘Ariadne’ in 2018.
  • Among English-speaking countries, the name 'Britta' is given to less than three in 10,000 baby girls.
  • In 2018, only 147 babies were named 'Calliope' in the UK.
  • The name 'Damara' was given to only 13 babies in the United States in 2016.
  • The name 'Eudora' has not appeared in the top 1000 names for girls in the United States since 1906.
  • In 2019, 'Ferelith' was given as a first name to fewer than 3 babies in the UK.
  • No girls were named 'Heloise' in the UK in 2020.
  • In 2018, only 150 girls were named 'Isolde' in the United States.
  • The unique name 'Jocasta' was given to fewer than 3 babies in the UK in 2018.
  • Only 50 babies were named 'Kirrily' in Australia in 2019.
  • The name 'Lior' was given to only 10 girls in the UK in 2018.
  • The name 'Mehitabel' was given to fewer than 3 girls in the UK in 2019.
  • The unique name 'Nyssa' was used for less than 50 baby girls in the United States in 2020.
  • Only 51 girls in the United States were named 'Odessa' in 2020.
  • In 2018, the rare name 'Qadira' was not given to any baby girls in the United States.
  • Only 5 babies were named 'Radella' in the UK in 2019.
  • The unique name 'Sybella' was given to just 10 new-born girls in Australia in 2017.

Table of Contents

The Latest Rare Girl Names Frequency Statistics Explained

In the United States, only 25 babies were given the rare name ‘Zephyrine’ in 2018.

The statistic ‘In the United States, only 25 babies were given the rare name ‘Zephyrine’ in 2018′ indicates that ‘Zephyrine’ is an uncommon and unique name choice for newborns in the country. With only 25 occurrences in the entire year, it suggests that the name is not widely popular among parents and is considered rare. This statistic provides insight into naming trends and preferences within the U.S. population, showcasing a diverse range of choices beyond more common names. The low frequency of ‘Zephyrine’ being chosen as a baby name in 2018 serves as a point of interest for those studying cultural norms and individuality in naming practices.

Only 50 girls in the United States were named ‘Ariadne’ in 2018.

The statistic “Only 50 girls in the United States were named ‘Ariadne’ in 2018” indicates that the name ‘Ariadne’ was not a common choice among parents for their baby girls that year. With a total population exceeding tens of millions of females born each year in the United States, the fact that only 50 of them were named Ariadne highlights the name’s rarity and uniqueness. This statistic reflects the diversity and individuality in naming practices, where some names are more popular and widespread while others remain relatively uncommon.

Among English-speaking countries, the name ‘Britta’ is given to less than three in 10,000 baby girls.

The statistic indicates that the name ‘Britta’ is relatively uncommon among English-speaking countries, with less than three out of every 10,000 baby girls being given this name. This suggests that ‘Britta’ is a rare choice compared to other more popular names for baby girls. The low frequency of the name ‘Britta’ highlights its uniqueness and the likelihood that individuals with this name may stand out in a crowd. The statistic provides valuable insight into naming trends and preferences among English-speaking populations, emphasizing the diversity and variability in the selection of names for newborn girls.

In 2018, only 147 babies were named ‘Calliope’ in the UK.

The statistic that only 147 babies were named ‘Calliope’ in the UK in 2018 indicates that the name is relatively rare and not commonly chosen by parents. This data point provides insight into naming trends and preferences among the population. The low number suggests that ‘Calliope’ may not be a popular or mainstream choice in the UK, potentially reflecting individuality or cultural influences in baby naming practices. Additionally, it could indicate that parents may be opting for more traditional or familiar names for their children.

The name ‘Damara’ was given to only 13 babies in the United States in 2016.

This statistic indicates that in the year 2016, only 13 newborn babies in the United States were named ‘Damara’. This information provides insight into the popularity and frequency of the name within the given time period and geographical location. The relatively low count of babies receiving this name suggests that ‘Damara’ is a rare and unique choice among parents in the United States. By examining such statistics, researchers can track naming trends, cultural influences, and individual preferences in the population. Additionally, this information may be of interest to parents seeking a distinct name for their child or to individuals studying the diversity of names within different regions and time frames.

The name ‘Eudora’ has not appeared in the top 1000 names for girls in the United States since 1906.

This statistic indicates that the name ‘Eudora’ has not been popular enough to make it into the top 1000 names for girls in the United States since 1906. This suggests that the name has not been commonly used or favored by parents over the past century. The absence of the name in the top 1000 list indicates that it has not been a prevalent choice among American families, possibly reflecting shifts in cultural trends or naming preferences.

In 2019, ‘Ferelith’ was given as a first name to fewer than 3 babies in the UK.

The statistic indicates that in the year 2019, the name ‘Ferelith’ was relatively rare and unique as it was given to fewer than three babies in the United Kingdom. This suggests that ‘Ferelith’ is an uncommon name choice among parents during that year. The small number of instances in which the name was chosen highlights its rarity and distinctiveness in comparison to more popular or common names. Overall, this statistic reflects the diversity and individuality in the choices parents make when selecting names for their children.

No girls were named ‘Heloise’ in the UK in 2020.

The statistic “No girls were named ‘Heloise’ in the UK in 2020” indicates that the name ‘Heloise’ was not registered for any baby girls born in the UK during the year 2020. This suggests that ‘Heloise’ was not a popular name choice among parents in the UK during that particular year. The data can be used to analyze naming trends and preferences among individuals in the UK, as well as potentially reflect broader cultural or societal influences shaping naming practices.

In 2018, only 150 girls were named ‘Isolde’ in the United States.

In 2018, only 150 girls in the United States were given the name ‘Isolde’, indicating that this name is relatively uncommon and not among the most popular choices for baby girls during that year. The statistic suggests that ‘Isolde’ is a unique and uncommon name compared to more traditional or trendy names that may have been given to a larger number of babies. This figure provides insight into the diversity and individuality of naming trends, showing a preference for less common names like ‘Isolde’ among some parents.

The unique name ‘Jocasta’ was given to fewer than 3 babies in the UK in 2018.

The statistic suggests that the name ‘Jocasta’ was very uncommon in the UK in 2018, as it was given to fewer than 3 babies during that year. This indicates that the name ‘Jocasta’ was not a popular choice among parents and was likely an extremely rare selection for a baby name. The low occurrence of this name highlights its unique and uncommon nature within the context of baby naming trends in the UK for that particular year.

Only 50 babies were named ‘Kirrily’ in Australia in 2019.

The statistic stating that only 50 babies were named ‘Kirrily’ in Australia in 2019 provides insight into the popularity and rarity of the name within the country for that year. With a relatively low count of only 50 occurrences, ‘Kirrily’ can be considered a unique and uncommon name choice compared to more popular names. This data is valuable for tracking naming trends and preferences among parents, as well as reflecting cultural influences and individuality in naming practices. Additionally, this statistic could also be used to analyze factors such as regional variations, historical significance, and potential future trends in baby naming patterns.

The name ‘Lior’ was given to only 10 girls in the UK in 2018.

This statistic indicates that the name ‘Lior’ was relatively uncommon for girls born in the United Kingdom in 2018, as it was given to only 10 individuals. The low frequency suggests that this name is not widely popular or traditionally used in the UK compared to more common names. The number also reflects the diversity of name choices available to parents, as they have the freedom to select unique or uncommon names for their children. Overall, this statistic provides insight into naming trends and preferences within a specific region and time period.

The name ‘Mehitabel’ was given to fewer than 3 girls in the UK in 2019.

This statistic indicates that the name ‘Mehitabel’ was an extremely rare choice among parents in the UK in 2019, as fewer than 3 girls were given this name during that year. This suggests that ‘Mehitabel’ is not a popular or common name in contemporary UK society. The low frequency of this name highlights its uniqueness and non-conformity to mainstream naming trends, making it an outlier in the spectrum of baby names.

The unique name ‘Nyssa’ was used for less than 50 baby girls in the United States in 2020.

The statistic indicates that the name ‘Nyssa’ was given to fewer than 50 baby girls born in the United States in the year 2020. This data point suggests that the name ‘Nyssa’ is relatively uncommon and not widely used as a given name for newborn girls in the country. The low frequency of occurrences of this name among baby girls in 2020 suggests that it is not a popular or trendy choice among parents, and may be considered more unique or rare compared to more commonly used names.

Only 51 girls in the United States were named ‘Odessa’ in 2020.

The statistic stating that only 51 girls in the United States were named ‘Odessa’ in 2020 provides insight into the rarity of this particular name choice within the country. With a population of over 300 million people, the fact that so few parents opted for the name ‘Odessa’ for their daughters in that year highlights its unique and uncommon status. This statistic offers a glimpse into the diversity and individuality of naming practices, showing that while some names may be popular and widespread, others remain distinctive and less commonly chosen.

In 2018, the rare name ‘Qadira’ was not given to any baby girls in the United States.

The statistic indicates that in the year 2018, the name ‘Qadira’ was exceptionally uncommon among parents in the United States, as it was not chosen for any baby girls during that period. This suggests that ‘Qadira’ did not meet the minimum threshold required for data reporting in the official records of baby names. The absence of the name ‘Qadira’ among newborn baby girls in 2018 signifies its rarity and obscurity within American naming practices for that year, making it a unique and distinctive name choice.

Only 5 babies were named ‘Radella’ in the UK in 2019.

The statistic that only 5 babies were named ‘Radella’ in the UK in 2019 indicates that the name is relatively rare and uncommon. This information provides insight into naming trends and preferences among parents in the UK for that particular year. The small number of occurrences suggests that ‘Radella’ is not a popular choice compared to other more common names. It could also imply that the name may hold special significance or be unique to those few families who have chosen it for their child. Such statistics can be useful for researchers studying naming patterns and sociocultural influences on naming practices within a specific region.

The unique name ‘Sybella’ was given to just 10 new-born girls in Australia in 2017.

This statistic indicates that the name ‘Sybella’ was a very uncommon choice for parents of new-born girls in Australia in 2017. With only 10 instances of the name being given to girls born in that year, it suggests that ‘Sybella’ is a rare and unique name within the Australian population. This information can be useful for understanding naming trends and preferences among parents, as well as providing insight into the diversity and individuality of name choices for children in a particular country or region.

References

0. – https://www.www.ssa.gov

1. – https://www.www.mccrindle.com.au

2. – https://www.names.darkgreener.com

3. – https://www.www.babycenter.com

4. – https://www.www.babynamewizard.com

5. – https://www.www.socialsecurity.gov

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents

Names And Identity Statistics: Explore more posts from this category

... Before You Leave, Catch This! 🔥

Your next business insight is just a subscription away. Our newsletter The Week in Data delivers the freshest statistics and trends directly to you. Stay informed, stay ahead—subscribe now.

Sign up for our newsletter and become the navigator of tomorrow's trends. Equip your strategy with unparalleled insights!