Movies have the power to evoke a wide range of emotions in viewers – joy, excitement, fear, and sometimes, outright disdain. In this blog post, we delve into the world of the most hated movies of all time. From critically panned flops to universally despised films, we explore what makes a movie so detestable and examine the reasons behind the strong negative reactions they provoke. Join us on this journey to uncover the movies that have earned the dubious distinction of being the most hated in cinematic history.
The Latest Most Hated Movies Explained
“Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (2009) by Michael Bay has an audience score of 57% on Rotten Tomatoes, indicating that it is hated by a large portion of viewers.
The statistic states that the movie “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (2009) directed by Michael Bay has an audience score of 57% on Rotten Tomatoes. This implies that approximately 43% of viewers gave the movie a positive rating, while the remaining 57% either gave it a negative rating or were neutral. While the 57% audience score may suggest that a large portion of viewers disliked the movie, it’s important to note that movie preferences can be subjective and influenced by individual tastes. Additionally, audience scores on platforms like Rotten Tomatoes may not always accurately reflect the overall quality or entertainment value of a film, as they are based on the opinions of a specific subset of viewers who choose to rate the movie online.
“Twilight” (2008) is ranked as the most hated movie according to the data from Ranker.
The statistic “Twilight” (2008) is ranked as the most hated movie according to the data from Ranker indicates that among the respondents or voters on Ranker’s platform, “Twilight” has received the most negative reviews or votes in comparison to any other movie. This suggests that a significant portion of the population who participated in the ranking process on Ranker expressed strong dislike or disdain towards the movie “Twilight.” While it is essential to consider the limitations of online rankings and the subjective nature of opinions on movies, this statistic provides a snapshot of the sentiment towards “Twilight” within this particular platform’s user base.
Film “Batman & Robin” (1997) received a rating of 3.8/10 on IMDb making it one of the most despised films.
The statistic that the film “Batman & Robin” (1997) received a rating of 3.8/10 on IMDb indicates that the movie was poorly received by viewers and critics alike. With a score well below the average rating on the platform, it is considered one of the most despised films in cinematic history. This low rating suggests that the film was likely plagued by significant flaws in its storytelling, acting, direction, or overall execution, leading to a negative reception from the audience. Despite being a part of the popular Batman film franchise, “Batman & Robin” failed to resonate with viewers and stands as an example of a cinematic endeavor that missed the mark in engaging its intended audience.
“Catwoman” (2004) is ranked 20th in the list of 100 worst movies of the 2000s, according to the data from IMDb.
The statistic that “Catwoman” (2004) is ranked 20th in the list of 100 worst movies of the 2000s, according to IMDb data, indicates that the movie received predominantly negative reviews and feedback from viewers during that time period. IMDb rankings are commonly based on user ratings and reviews, suggesting that the film was not well-received and is considered to be among the bottom tier of movies released in the 2000s. This statistic highlights the general consensus of audiences towards “Catwoman” as being one of the least favorable movies of that decade.
“The Last Airbender” (2010) by M. Night Shyamalan holds a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “The Last Airbender” (2010) by M. Night Shyamalan holds a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that only 5% of the reviews aggregated on the Rotten Tomatoes website were positive for this particular film. Rotten Tomatoes gathers reviews from various critics and compiles them into a single score to indicate the overall critical reception of a movie. In this case, the low score suggests that the majority of critics had negative opinions about “The Last Airbender,” highlighting its poor quality and unfavorable reception within the film industry and among audiences.
“Showgirls” (1995) is considered one of the worst films ever made, with a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that ‘Showgirls’ (1995) holds a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that the film was poorly received by critics upon its release. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates the reviews of professional film critics to calculate a percentage score, with 0% representing entirely negative reviews and 100% representing entirely positive ones. A 22% rating reflects a substantial amount of negative reviews and suggests that the majority of critics found ‘Showgirls’ to be of low quality. This statistic categorizes ‘Showgirls’ as one of the worst films ever made in the eyes of the critical community, highlighting its lack of critical acclaim and likely disappointing reception among audiences as well.
“The Room” (2003) is often called the worst movie ever made with a score of 26% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “The Room” (2003) is often considered the worst movie ever made with a 26% score on Rotten Tomatoes encapsulates the general critical consensus on the film’s quality. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates professional reviews and calculates a percentage score based on the proportion of positive to negative reviews. In this case, the low 26% score suggests that the majority of critics had negative opinions about the movie, likely citing issues with the film’s acting, plot, directing, and overall production quality. This statistic serves as a reflection of the overall perceived quality of “The Room” within the film industry and among audiences, highlighting its reputation as a cinematic failure.
“Gotti” (2018) is one of the few films to have a 0% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic “Gotti” (2018) having a 0% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that all the professional critics who reviewed the film on the platform gave it a negative rating, resulting in no positive reviews. This finding suggests that the film was overwhelmingly disliked by critics, highlighting its poor quality and lack of critical acclaim. A 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes is quite rare and indicates a strong consensus among critics that the film did not meet the expected standards of quality, making it stand out for all the wrong reasons in terms of critical reception.
“The Emoji Movie” (2017) received a 7% critic rating and 38% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic indicates that “The Emoji Movie” (2017) received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics, with only 7% of critics giving it a positive rating on Rotten Tomatoes. In contrast, the audience score for the movie is slightly higher at 38%, suggesting that a larger proportion of general viewers found some value or enjoyment in the film compared to critics. The discrepancy between the critic rating and audience score may suggest a disconnect in opinions between professional critics and the general public, potentially highlighting the movie’s appeal or lack thereof to different demographics or viewing preferences.
“Movie 43” (2013) is despised by many critics and cinephiles, with a rating of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Movie 43” (2013) has a rating of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes signifies a widespread dislike of the film among critics and cinephiles. Rotten Tomatoes is a popular review aggregator that compiles critics’ opinions to generate a score representing the percentage of positive reviews for a given film. In this case, the low rating indicates that only 5% of reviews for “Movie 43” were positive, with the vast majority expressing negative opinions about the film. Such a low score suggests that the movie was poorly received and generally considered to be of low quality, making it a target of criticism and derision within the film community.
“Birdemic: Shock and Terror” (2010) received a 1.8 out of 10 rating on IMDb.
The statistic that “Birdemic: Shock and Terror” (2010) received a 1.8 out of 10 rating on IMDb indicates that the film was overwhelmingly poorly received by viewers on the platform. IMDb ratings are based on users’ feedback and provide a measure of audience satisfaction with a particular movie. A rating of 1.8 suggests that the film was perceived as having significant flaws or shortcomings, potentially in areas such as plot, acting, production quality, or overall entertainment value. Despite its low rating, such statistics can be subjective and impacted by individual preferences, but in this case, it is clear that the majority of IMDb users did not find “Birdemic: Shock and Terror” to be a favorable or well-executed film.
“Gigli” (2003) received a score of just 6% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic “Gigli” (2003) received a score of just 6% on Rotten Tomatoes means that only 6% of critics and reviewers who watched and rated the movie on the Rotten Tomatoes website gave it a positive review. This extremely low score indicates that the movie was overwhelmingly disliked by the majority of reviewers, highlighting its poor quality and lack of critical acclaim. A score of 6% on Rotten Tomatoes suggests that “Gigli” (2003) was likely a critical and commercial failure, as it failed to resonate with audiences and critics alike.
“Jack and Jill” (2011) starring Adam Sandler has a rating of only 3% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Jack and Jill” (2011) starring Adam Sandler has a rating of only 3% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that the overwhelming majority of critics who reviewed the movie had a negative opinion of it. Rotten Tomatoes calculates its ratings by aggregating the reviews of professional critics, with a rating of 0% representing all negative reviews and 100% representing all positive reviews. In this case, the 3% rating suggests that only a very small fraction of reviews were positive while the vast majority were negative. This low rating can be seen as an indication of the general consensus among critics that “Jack and Jill” was not well-received critically.
“The Master of Disguise” (2002) holds a score of 1% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic “The Master of Disguise” (2002) holds a score of 1% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that only 1% of the critics who reviewed the movie on the Rotten Tomatoes website gave it a positive rating. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates reviews from professional film critics and calculates the percentage of positive reviews to determine a movie’s score. A score of 1% suggests that the overwhelming majority of critics have a negative opinion of the movie, indicating that it was poorly received critically. This low score can be used as an indicator of the overall quality of the film according to critical consensus.
“Death Note” (2017) has one of lowest ratings for a Netflix Original film with 38% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Death Note” (2017) has one of the lowest ratings for a Netflix Original film with a 38% score on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that the film was poorly received by critics. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates reviews from professional critics and calculates a percentage based on the number of positive reviews versus negative reviews. A score of 38% suggests that the majority of critics found the film to be lacking in quality or entertainment value. This statistic highlights the film’s lack of critical acclaim and may serve as a warning to potential viewers about its perceived shortcomings.
“The Ridiculous 6” (2015), an unfortunate Netflix Western spoof, holds a 0% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes, making it one of the most detested films.
The statistic pertaining to “The Ridiculous 6” (2015) highlights its abysmal 0% critic rating on Rotten Tomatoes, solidifying its reputation as one of the most reviled films in cinematic history. The film, labeled as an unfortunate Netflix Western spoof, failed to garner any positive reviews from critics, painting a picture of unanimous disdain towards its content, storytelling, and overall execution. The stark 0% rating serves as a clear indicator of the film’s lack of quality and appeal, positioning it as an exemplar of critical failure and a cautionary tale in the realm of filmmaking.
“Street Fighter” (1994) holds a score of only 10% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Street Fighter” (1994) holds a score of only 10% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that the overall critical reception of the movie is predominantly negative. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates movie reviews from critics and calculates a percentage based on the proportion of positive to negative reviews. In this case, only 10% of the reviews for “Street Fighter” were considered positive, emphasizing the general consensus among critics that the film did not meet expectations or was poorly received. This low score suggests that the movie may have significant flaws in its script, acting, directing, or overall execution, leading to a lack of critical acclaim.
“Glitter” (2001) starring Mariah Carey received a score of 6% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic “Glitter” (2001) starring Mariah Carey received a score of 6% on Rotten Tomatoes means that only 6% of the critics who reviewed the movie on the Rotten Tomatoes website gave it a positive rating. This low score indicates that the movie was not well-received critically, with the majority of reviewers finding it to be of poor quality. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates reviews from professional critics, making this score a reflection of the general consensus among professional reviewers regarding the film’s overall quality.
“Freddie Got Fingered” (2001) has a rating of 11% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Freddie Got Fingered” (2001) has a rating of 11% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates that the movie received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes calculates this score based on the percentage of critics who gave the film a positive review compared to those who gave it a negative review. In this case, only 11% of critics gave “Freddie Got Fingered” a positive review, highlighting its lack of critical acclaim. Therefore, the low rating suggests that the movie may not be well-received by the general audience as well, making it a generally unpopular film according to Rotten Tomatoes’ aggregation of critical reviews.
“Striptease” (1996) starring Demi Moore holds a score of 11% on Rotten Tomatoes.
The statistic that “Striptease” (1996) starring Demi Moore holds a score of 11% on Rotten Tomatoes indicates the low critical reception of the movie. Rotten Tomatoes aggregates reviews from critics and provides an overall rating based on the percentage of positive reviews. In this case, out of all the reviews collected for “Striptease,” only 11% were classified as positive. A score of 11% suggests that the majority of critics did not find the movie favorable, highlighting its lack of critical acclaim and potentially informing potential viewers about the quality of the film according to professional reviewers.
References
0. – https://www.www.rottentomatoes.com
1. – https://www.www.ranker.com
2. – https://www.www.imdb.com
