Key Takeaways
- 26.0% of U.S. high school students reported using social media daily (YRBSS 2021)
- 1 in 4 teens report using social media to find out about products or services at least sometimes (Pew Research Center, 2022)
- 48% of U.S. teens say they have used a dating app or site (Pew Research Center, 2021)
- 50% of U.S. parents say they worry about teen dating violence (American Psychological Association survey, 2020)
- VAWnet reports that 25–33% of teens experience dating violence (VAWnet)
- The U.S. Department of Justice estimates 750,000 victims are age 12–34 for intimate partner violence each year (DOJ/NCVS-based)
- Second Step program has evidence of improvements in social-emotional competencies including reducing bullying and aggression (RAND evaluation/CDC)
- A systematic review found bystander intervention training can increase intention to intervene and related attitudes (peer-reviewed)
- A randomized trial of the Safe Dates program found reductions in physical dating violence among participants (peer-reviewed paper)
- CDC YRBS sampling uses a two-stage cluster design with weights to produce population estimates (CDC methods)
- A JAMA Pediatrics study reports the average annual cost associated with adolescent violence-related injuries (peer-reviewed)
- A RAND report estimates the economic burden of youth violence in the U.S. at $8.9 billion annually (RAND)
- $4.9 billion annual cost of nonfatal injuries from youth violence in the U.S. (cost magnitude).
- 33% of teens report that a friend has told them to stop bullying or to intervene (bystander willingness context).
- 56% of educators reported having a bullying prevention program or policy in place in the 2023–2024 school year (prevention adoption).
Social media use is widespread, yet unwanted messages and dating violence concerns highlight the need for prevention.
User Adoption
User Adoption Interpretation
Industry Trends
Industry Trends Interpretation
Performance Metrics
Performance Metrics Interpretation
Cost Analysis
Cost Analysis Interpretation
Economic Impact
Economic Impact Interpretation
Bystander & Prevention
Bystander & Prevention Interpretation
Attitudes & Beliefs
Attitudes & Beliefs Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Christopher Morgan. (2026, February 13). High School Relationship Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/high-school-relationship-statistics
Christopher Morgan. "High School Relationship Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/high-school-relationship-statistics.
Christopher Morgan. 2026. "High School Relationship Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/high-school-relationship-statistics.
References
- 1cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/index.htm
- 16cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/methods.htm
- 2pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/
- 3pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/teens-social-media-and-technology-2021/
- 4pewresearch.org/science-and-technology/2019/12/12/teens-and-sex/
- 5pewresearch.org/internet/2022/09/01/online-harassment/
- 6commonsensemedia.org/research
- 7apa.org/news/press/releases/2020/12/teen-dating-violence
- 8vawnet.org/material/teen-dating-violence
- 9bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv09.pdf
- 10rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3090.html
- 18rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2682.html
- 19rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1531.html
- 11journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167702620956707
- 12pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14977765/
- 13pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26302645/
- 14pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17893326/
- 15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31571470/
- 17jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2730472
- 20ditchthelabel.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Ditch-the-Label-State-of-Online-Hate-2024.pdf
- 22ditchthelabel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Ditch-the-Label-Online-Bullying-Report-2023.pdf
- 21proquest.com/openview/6f3f8d3e2e4c9d9d5d1b5c3d1c0f2e0c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- 23ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/227921/childrens-use-of-the-internet-2024.pdf
- 24advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/teens-dating-violence-attitudes-report.pdf
- 25advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/social-media-and-abusive-relationships-survey.pdf







