Key Takeaways
- Medicare spending for amputations in people with diabetes increased from $1.2 billion (2011) to $2.1 billion (2016)
- In the U.S., the total economic costs of diabetes (including direct and indirect) were $1.3 trillion in 2017
- A 2017 U.S. estimate put the incremental cost of diabetes-related complications at $19,185 per person per year for those with complications (vs. those without)
- Between 2000 and 2010 in the U.S., the proportion of U.S. adults with diabetes who underwent a major lower-extremity amputation fell from 2.1 per 1,000 to 1.2 per 1,000
- 2019 data from the U.S. showed that 96.4% of lower-extremity amputations in people with diabetes were associated with diabetic foot ulcers
- In a 2018 analysis, diabetes accounted for 50% of all U.S. non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations
- In a systematic review, 1-year mortality after amputation in people with diabetes was 20.3% (pooled)
- In a meta-analysis, diabetes increases the risk of lower-limb amputation by about 25-fold compared with people without diabetes
- In a 2020 cohort study, 5-year survival after major amputation in people with diabetes was 45%
- The global diabetic foot ulcer treatment market was valued at $2.0 billion in 2021 and projected to reach $3.3 billion by 2028 (CAGR 7.4%)
- The global diabetes device market (including monitoring and related devices) reached $20.8 billion in 2023
- The global continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) market was valued at $8.4 billion in 2022 and expected to reach $21.3 billion by 2030 (CAGR ~12.5%)
- A 2021 cohort study found that 30-day readmission after major amputation in patients with diabetes was 18%
- In a 2020 study, timely revascularization within 14 days for critical limb-threatening ischemia reduced major amputation rates by 31%
- In a large claims study, multidisciplinary diabetic foot care programs reduced amputation risk by 45%
Rising diabetes costs and ulcer burden drive fewer but still high amputation risks, especially when care delays or complications persist.
Cost Analysis
Cost Analysis Interpretation
Disease Burden
Disease Burden Interpretation
Risk & Outcomes
Risk & Outcomes Interpretation
Market & Industry
Market & Industry Interpretation
Treatment & Practice
Treatment & Practice Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Sophie Moreland. (2026, February 13). Diabetes And Amputations Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/diabetes-and-amputations-statistics
Sophie Moreland. "Diabetes And Amputations Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/diabetes-and-amputations-statistics.
Sophie Moreland. 2026. "Diabetes And Amputations Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/diabetes-and-amputations-statistics.
References
- 1jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2779664
- 3jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2659783
- 2diabetesjournals.org/care/article/42/8/1669/35732/Economic-costs-of-diabetes-in-the-U-S-in-2017
- 10diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/article/68/5/1155/35357/Proportion-of-amputations-in-diabetes-associated-with
- 33diabetesjournals.org/care/article/44/5/1092/37779/Diabetes-prevalence-and-associated-chronic
- 34diabetesjournals.org/care/article/44/2/354/35000
- 4pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23957603/
- 5pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29186891/
- 6pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31019991/
- 7pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32259520/
- 8pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34422976/
- 9pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31642125/
- 14pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30421396/
- 15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30852189/
- 16pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21414214/
- 17pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33119353/
- 18pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31758584/
- 19pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31425203/
- 20pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31924005/
- 21pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35827244/
- 22pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30626811/
- 23pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28127095/
- 24pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28759950/
- 25pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27490661/
- 35pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34628763/
- 37pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32467269/
- 38pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32825866/
- 39pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30791333/
- 40pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29632826/
- 41pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32662254/
- 43pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28672734/
- 44pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33937012/
- 11ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103487/
- 12ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433346/
- 13ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6033029/
- 26fortunebusinessinsights.com/diabetic-foot-ulcer-treatment-market-102875
- 27idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS51298423
- 28globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/09/26/2741937/0/en/Continuous-Glucose-Monitoring-Market-Size-Was-USD-8-4-Billion-in-2022-and-is-Expected-to-Reach-USD-21-3-Billion-by-2030.html
- 29grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/diabetes-care-market
- 30grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/wound-care-industry
- 31imarcgroup.com/negative-pressure-wound-therapy-market
- 32accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm
- 36ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043556
- 42academic.oup.com/journal/article/74/3/5/6559780







