Key Takeaways
- In the United States, the overall survival to hospital discharge rate for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with CPR is approximately 9.1% based on 2021 CARES data
- Shockable initial rhythm in OHCA leads to a survival rate of 29.7% to hospital discharge compared to 1.8% for non-shockable rhythms per 2022 AHA report
- In urban areas, OHCA survival to discharge is 11.2% versus 6.8% in rural areas according to 2019 ROC registry analysis
- In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) survival to discharge is 25.8% per 2022 AHA Get With The Guidelines
- Shockable rhythm IHCA survival 38.9% versus 11.7% asystole/PEA in US 2021 registry
- IHCA in ICU survival to discharge 22.4% versus 29.1% in general wards per 2019 study
- Bystander CPR in OHCA increases survival to discharge by 2.8 times (from 7% to 19.6%) per 2022 AHA
- Dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR triples survival from 5.6% to 17.7% in unwitnessed OHCA 2021 study
- Bystander CPR in public OHCA yields 45% survival if AED also used versus 15% CPR alone Japan 2020
- Public AED use by bystanders before EMS arrival increases OHCA survival to 67% in shockable rhythms per 2022 Japanese registry
- Bystander AED application within 3 minutes yields 74% survival in witnessed VF OHCA Seattle 2020
- AED-equipped public sites OHCA survival 54.2% versus 9.3% non-equipped locations 2021 CARES
- Pediatric OHCA survival to discharge 9.2% overall lower than adults per 2022 AHA
- Infant (<1 year) CPR survival 5.6% versus 12.4% children 1-12 in US 2021 CARES
- Bystander CPR in pediatric OHCA survival 15.5% vs 4.5% no bystander per ROC 2020
Several key factors greatly increase the chance of surviving a cardiac arrest with CPR.
AED
AED Interpretation
Bystander CPR
Bystander CPR Interpretation
IHCA
IHCA Interpretation
OHCA
OHCA Interpretation
Pediatric
Pediatric Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Diana Reeves. (2026, February 13). Cpr Survival Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/cpr-survival-statistics
Diana Reeves. "Cpr Survival Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/cpr-survival-statistics.
Diana Reeves. 2026. "Cpr Survival Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/cpr-survival-statistics.
Sources & References
- Reference 1MYCARESmycares.netVisit source
- Reference 2CPRcpr.heart.orgVisit source
- Reference 3PUBMEDpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 4RESUSCITATIONJOURNALresuscitationjournal.comVisit source
- Reference 5RESUSresus.org.ukVisit source
- Reference 6EUROINTERVENTIONeurointervention.pcronline.comVisit source
- Reference 7PROFESSIONALprofessional.heart.orgVisit source
- Reference 8NEJMnejm.orgVisit source
- Reference 9PUBMEDpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.nih.govVisit source






