GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Rehabilitation Software of 2026
Ranked top 10 rehabilitation software for clinics, including TherapyPartner, Net Health, and Jane, with care tools, tracking, and progress reports.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Apollo Practice Management is the strongest fit when rehab clinics need episode-aligned scheduling and documentation with payer-facing consistency, whereas Net Health works better for multi-location rehab orgs that want end-to-end scheduling plus governance-ready clinical documentation.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Apollo Practice Management
Episode of care workflow that ties scheduling, treatment plan steps, and discharge-ready documentation into one patient record thread.
Built for fits when rehab clinics need episode-aligned scheduling and documentation with payer-facing workflow consistency..
Net Health
Editor pickEpisode-oriented rehab documentation that connects visit execution to care plan and progress artifacts.
Built for fits when rehab organizations need end-to-end scheduling plus clinical documentation with multi-location governance..
Jane
Editor pickEpisode-level linkage that ties evaluations, treatment plans, and progress notes to the same care window.
Built for fits when outpatient rehab clinics need one episode workflow from intake to progress reporting and outcomes tracking..
Comparison Table
Apollo Practice Management
SMBPractice management software for rehabilitation and therapy clinics.
Episode of care workflow that ties scheduling, treatment plan steps, and discharge-ready documentation into one patient record thread.
Apollo Practice Management centers rehabilitation clinic operations around episode-based records, encounter scheduling, and documentation readiness for utilization review. The system supports initial evaluation capture, ongoing daily note capture, and discharge summary completion within the same care episode flow. Admin users can manage appointment workflows and staff access without switching tools between clinical and practice management tasks.
A tradeoff appears in automation depth for highly customized rehab documentation standards, since advanced variations tend to require careful template configuration and process alignment. Apollo Practice Management fits best when clinics want one system for scheduling and rehab documentation that also needs consistent outputs for medical necessity workflows.
- +Episode-based scheduling and documentation keep records consistent
- +Treatment plan and encounter documentation lifecycles reduce rework
- +Role permissions separate front-desk tasks from clinical editing
- +Workflow outputs support payer and utilization review routines
- –Deep template customization can add governance overhead for admins
- –FHIR-style interoperability requires planning if external systems expect strict schemas
- –Some complex rehab reporting needs manual setup per clinic process
Outpatient PT clinic admins
Run episode scheduling and documentation
Fewer documentation handoff errors
Rehab clinicians
Produce evaluation through discharge notes
Faster note completion
Show 1 more scenario
Revenue cycle teams
Prepare utilization review documentation
More complete review packets
Teams generate medical-necessity-ready documentation artifacts from encounter history and episode context.
Best for: Fits when rehab clinics need episode-aligned scheduling and documentation with payer-facing workflow consistency.
Net Health
enterpriseHealthcare software that includes rehabilitation documentation, scheduling, and operational tools.
Episode-oriented rehab documentation that connects visit execution to care plan and progress artifacts.
Net Health fits clinics that run structured therapy workflows across outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation settings, including initial evaluation documentation and follow-on treatment notes. The system ties scheduling and visit execution to clinical documentation and care plan artifacts, which reduces the gap between appointment management and documentation work. Integration is a key angle for organizations that must connect the rehab workflow to broader practice management and electronic health record environments.
A key tradeoff is governance overhead, because teams must maintain consistent configuration across locations for scheduling rules and documentation expectations. Net Health works best for therapy groups with dedicated admin support who standardize templates and care plan structure, then automate recurring tasks like reminders and intake steps around those templates.
- +Clinical documentation flows closely from scheduling to care plan artifacts
- +Built for rehab operational workflows across multiple care settings
- +Supports structured intake and visit execution tied to therapy notes
- +Reporting supports clinical management needs tied to documentation
- –Strong configuration discipline is required across templates and scheduling rules
- –Documentation workflow may feel heavier for very small therapy staffs
- –Some admin tasks increase workload when workflows differ by location
- –EHR practice management integration planning can add implementation complexity
Multi-location clinic admins
Standardize documentation and scheduling across sites
Fewer template and workflow drift issues
Therapy supervisors
Monitor clinical progress over time
More consistent progress tracking
Show 2 more scenarios
Revenue cycle and compliance teams
Support utilization documentation needs
Cleaner utilization documentation handoff
Clinical artifacts generated from rehab documentation workflows support medical necessity narratives and reviews.
Operations teams
Reduce intake and appointment friction
More complete pre-visit intake
Patient intake workflows and appointment execution reduce manual coordination before first visits.
Best for: Fits when rehab organizations need end-to-end scheduling plus clinical documentation with multi-location governance.
Jane
SMBOnline clinic management software for allied health and rehabilitation practices.
Episode-level linkage that ties evaluations, treatment plans, and progress notes to the same care window.
Jane is built around episode of care concepts, so initial evaluation entries and subsequent daily or progress documentation stay linked to the same care window. The app’s outcomes and progress reporting is designed to pull from recorded measures, then present summary views for clinicians and managers. Appointment reminders and intake forms reduce manual data entry before the first visit. For interoperability, Jane offers integration options and an API surface aimed at syncing clinical and administrative data between systems.
A key tradeoff is that clinics with highly customized internal workflows may need configuration work to align forms, document templates, and reporting fields to local documentation standards. Jane fits best for outpatient rehabilitation teams that want one system for scheduling through medical necessity style progress documentation. It also works well when care models require consistent capture of functional measures across sessions for each episode.
- +Episode-linked documentation keeps evaluations, plans, and progress notes connected
- +Outcomes reporting summarizes functional measures from recorded patient data
- +Clinician dashboards support visit-focused work without switching tools
- +Admin views provide operational oversight across scheduling and documentation status
- –Template configuration effort can be significant for complex clinic documentation standards
- –Cross-tool reporting may require careful mapping when measures differ by clinic
Physical therapy clinic managers
Coordinate evaluations and progress reporting
More consistent episode tracking
Rehab clinicians
Document daily treatment notes
Faster note completion
Show 2 more scenarios
Occupational therapy directors
Standardize functional outcome measures
Clearer measure trends
Teams capture outcomes during visits and view patient summaries for progress over time.
Clinic operations teams
Manage intake and scheduling workflows
Lower front-desk burden
Ops staff coordinate patient intake forms and reminders to reduce pre-visit manual work.
Best for: Fits when outpatient rehab clinics need one episode workflow from intake to progress reporting and outcomes tracking.
WebPT
vertical specialistPractice management and electronic medical record software for rehabilitation clinics.
WebPT’s therapy documentation flow generates episode-ready notes and discharge artifacts from structured treatment activities.
WebPT is rehab documentation and care coordination software built around therapist workflows instead of generic charting screens. It supports clinical documentation that flows into treatment plan and episode workflows, plus scheduling and patient communication around visits.
Reporting centers on outcomes and progress reporting tied to therapy documentation, including discharge documentation. Integration is handled through interoperability features aimed at connecting rehab documentation to surrounding practice and EHR environments.
- +Therapy documentation templates map directly to daily notes and episode artifacts
- +Scheduling and patient messaging support visit execution beyond charting
- +Outcomes reporting connects functional measures to progress and discharge
- +Administrative configuration supports multi-user clinic operations
- –Interoperability depends on external setup and interface alignment
- –Some documentation customization requires disciplined template governance
- –Reporting depth can feel tied to the documented workflow structure
- –Workflow fit varies by discipline and care setting without extra configuration
Best for: Fits when clinics need therapy-first documentation, episode-level reporting, and clinic operations in one workflow.
Raintree
enterpriseRehabilitation management software covering clinical, financial, and operational workflows.
Episode-based documentation flow that links initial evaluation data to treatment plan updates and progress notes.
Raintree supports rehabilitation clinics with clinical documentation workflows, visit-based therapy scheduling, and episode tracking for outcomes reporting. It focuses on care-plan management that connects initial evaluation inputs to treatment plan updates and progress note creation. The system also supports structured patient intake and functional outcome measures to support ongoing documentation across the therapy cycle.
- +Clinical documentation workflow keeps evaluation, plan, and notes connected
- +Therapy scheduling supports visit-level operations for outpatient caseloads
- +Functional outcome measures support repeatable progress reporting
- +Episode tracking helps manage the start-to-discharge documentation arc
- –Reconfiguration is needed to match clinic-specific documentation conventions
- –API and automation depth lag behind systems built for heavy interoperability
- –Governance controls like RBAC and audit log require process discipline
- –Complex billing and utilization workflows may need external tooling
Best for: Fits when outpatient therapy teams need linked documentation and progress tracking across an episode.
Clinicient INSIGHT
SMBEMR and billing software for outpatient rehabilitation therapy practices.
Integrated functional outcome measures and impairment tracking that automatically carry through progress reporting and episode closeout.
Clinicient INSIGHT is a rehabilitation-focused care management system that centers on episode-based workflows for therapy clinics and related programs.
It supports clinical documentation across evaluation, daily treatment notes, progress reporting, and discharge summaries tied to a treatment plan.
Functional outcome measures and impairment-style tracking are built into the documentation and reporting flow rather than living in separate spreadsheets.
Integration capability focuses on operational handoffs through practice and clinical data connections, plus automation around scheduling and referral-to-care processes.
- +Episode-oriented documentation links evaluation, treatment plan, and discharge outputs
- +Functional outcome and impairment tracking feed progress reporting within the same workflow
- +Therapy scheduling and reminders reduce manual follow-ups between visits
- +Configurable templates keep daily notes consistent across clinicians
- –Clinical documentation depth can increase time-to-familiarity for new sites
- –External interoperability depends on enabled integration paths rather than universal data exchange
- –Advanced reporting customization requires administrative workflow setup discipline
- –Tele-rehabilitation features are not as central as in some rehab-first competitors
Best for: Fits when rehab clinics need episode-tied documentation and functional outcomes reporting without moving between tools.
HENO
vertical specialistPractice management software for physical therapy and rehabilitation organizations.
Episode timeline builder that links evaluation, treatment plan updates, and daily treatment documentation into one configurable sequence.
HENO focuses on therapy workflows built around clinicians documenting episodes of care and tracking day-to-day treatment activities. It supports structured progress reporting that links evaluations, treatment plans, and follow-up notes within a single clinical timeline.
The product also includes patient-facing components for intake and homework style home exercise program materials tied to visits. Its distinct value shows up in configuration options for specialty-specific documentation sequences rather than generic note templates.
- +Episode-centered workflow keeps evaluation, plan, and notes linked
- +Configurable treatment note structures reduce manual backfilling
- +Patient-facing intake and exercise materials support continuity between visits
- +Progress reporting ties clinical updates to a tracked episode timeline
- –Interoperability depth depends on integration work rather than native breadth
- –Workflow configuration requires governance to avoid inconsistent documentation
Best for: Fits when therapy clinics want episode-based documentation and configurable note workflows with minimal custom development.
Exercise Pro
vertical specialistExercise prescription and patient engagement software for rehabilitation professionals.
Episode-level progress tracking that links goals to subsequent daily treatment notes and discharge outcomes.
Exercise Pro targets rehabilitation clinics with therapy scheduling, structured clinical documentation for visits, and episode-level progress tracking. The system centers on rehab workflows such as initial evaluation, daily treatment notes, and discharge documentation tied to treatment goals.
It supports patient intake and therapy-related reminders that reduce manual coordination across front-desk and clinicians. Automation is most visible in how completed documentation and plan updates feed forward into subsequent visits and progress reporting.
- +Rehab-focused documentation templates for evaluation, daily notes, and discharge
- +Progress tracking stays aligned to goals across a treatment episode
- +Scheduling and reminder workflows reduce clinician and front-desk handoffs
- +Patient intake flows support consistent data capture before first visits
- –EHR and practice management integration depth is unclear from published materials
- –Advanced automation and API access appear limited versus integration-first vendors
- –Progress reporting customization can be constrained by built-in report formats
- –Role permissions and audit log controls require careful administrative setup
Best for: Fits when rehab teams need structured notes and episode progress tracking without deep EHR build-outs.
TheraOffice
SMBRehabilitation therapy EMR and clinic management software.
Configurable therapy note templates and structured documentation flows that keep evaluations, treatment plans, and daily notes in one charting pattern.
TheraOffice schedules therapy visits and produces clinical documentation for PT, OT, and SLP workflows. The system supports initial evaluations, treatment plans, and progress note templates designed around daily treatment documentation.
It also manages recurring patient tasks such as intake fields and home exercise program content tied to clinical notes. Governance features focus on controlled access to records and configurable templates for consistent charting output.
- +Visit scheduling and documentation templates align to common therapy charting sequences
- +Treatment plan and progress note workflows reduce rekeying during recurring visits
- +Home exercise program content can be generated from the same clinical record context
- +Role-based access supports controlled access to patient charts
- –Advanced reporting depends on configuration rather than built-in analytics depth
- –Integration coverage for external EHR and practice systems can be limited by setup effort
Best for: Fits when outpatient therapy clinics need consistent documentation templates and scheduling tied to patient records.
Rehab Optima
enterpriseTherapy management software for skilled nursing and rehab facilities.
Episode-linked documentation flow that ties initial evaluation, ongoing progress notes, and discharge summaries into one continuous care record.
Rehab Optima is a rehabilitation clinic software for day-to-day therapy workflows, documentation, and outcomes tracking. It centers on clinical note creation across visit types and turns assessments into treatment planning artifacts used during ongoing care.
The system supports progress documentation and discharge summaries tied to episodes of care workflows. Rehab Optima also targets appointment and intake flows so therapy teams can move from referral to first visit with fewer handoffs.
- +Visit note templates reduce rework across daily treatment documentation
- +Care planning artifacts keep initial evaluation outputs connected to follow-ups
- +Progress documentation supports measurable change tracking over time
- +Intake and scheduling workflows support referral-to-first-visit movement
- –Integration depth for interoperability standards is unclear from the product surface
- –Automation options for authorizations and utilization review workflows are limited
- –Extensibility for custom data fields and reporting requires setup discipline
- –Role-based governance controls such as granular audit logging are not evident
Best for: Fits when outpatient therapy teams need structured notes and outcomes tracking with minimal workflow customization.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 healthcare medicine, Apollo Practice Management stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right rehabilitation software
Rehabilitation software supports episode-aligned workflows that tie scheduling, clinical documentation, and discharge-ready outputs into one patient record thread, and this guide covers Apollo Practice Management, Net Health, Jane, WebPT, Raintree, Clinicient INSIGHT, HENO, Exercise Pro, TheraOffice, and Rehab Optima. Across these reviewed tools, the practical differentiator is how each system links initial evaluation data to treatment plan artifacts and then carries progress documentation through to episode closeout.
That linkage shows up in different places depending on the product. Apollo Practice Management centers episode workflow so treatment plan steps and discharge-ready documentation stay connected, while Net Health connects visit execution to care plan and progress artifacts across multiple care settings and locations.
Rehabilitation software for episode-based scheduling, documentation, and progress reporting
Rehabilitation software helps therapy teams manage clinical documentation from initial evaluation through daily treatment note cycles and then to discharge summaries while keeping episode context intact. The strongest implementations thread evaluations, treatment plans, and progress artifacts into the same care window so clinicians do not rekey details across separate workflows.
Apollo Practice Management ties episode workflow to scheduling plus treatment plan steps and then produces discharge-ready documentation from that same patient record thread. Net Health focuses on episode-oriented rehab documentation that connects scheduling to care plan artifacts and progress reporting across multi-location governance, which changes how configuration and template governance affect day-to-day documentation throughput.
Episode-linked workflow, documentation throughput, and integration control points
Rehabilitation software succeeds when episode context stays intact across scheduling, evaluations, treatment plan steps, and discharge artifacts in the same record thread. That episode thread determines documentation throughput because clinicians stop rekeying dates, goals, and outcomes across separate note and scheduling workflows.
Episode of care workflow that ties scheduling, plan steps, and discharge-ready documentation
Apollo Practice Management links episode-aligned scheduling, treatment plan steps, and discharge-ready documentation into one patient record thread, which reduces rework at episode closeout. Net Health also connects visit execution to care plan and progress artifacts across multi-location governance.
Clinical documentation flows that connect scheduling execution to care plan and progress artifacts
Net Health uses scheduling-driven clinical documentation flows that carry execution into care plan artifacts and progress reporting. WebPT generates episode-ready notes and discharge artifacts from structured therapy activities plus scheduling and patient messaging.
Functional outcomes and impairment tracking carried through progress reporting and episode closeout
Clinicient INSIGHT integrates functional outcome measures and impairment tracking so those fields automatically feed progress reporting and episode closeout. Jane links evaluations, treatment plans, and progress notes to the same care window and then summarizes functional measures from recorded patient data.
Configurable episode timeline builders and template governance controls
HENO provides an episode timeline builder that links evaluation, treatment plan updates, and daily treatment documentation into one configurable sequence. Raintree delivers an episode-based documentation flow that links initial evaluation data to treatment plan updates and progress notes, with scheduling supporting visit-level operations for outpatient caseloads.
Integration depth and automation surface for interoperability expectations
Apollo Practice Management supports FHIR-style interoperability that requires schema planning when external systems expect strict structures. Raintree and Exercise Pro show weaker automation and API depth coverage in published materials, which can shift integration work into configuration projects.
Pick the episode model and documentation ownership style that matches clinic operations
Most rehabilitation software tools differentiate by how they structure the episode thread and how much governance they require to keep daily treatment note cycles consistent. The better fit depends on whether documentation ownership lives inside therapy templates, inside scheduling-driven flows, or inside an episode timeline builder that enforces sequence.
Choose the episode thread anchor based on scheduling and discharge expectations
If episode-aligned scheduling and discharge-ready documentation must be produced from one record thread, Apollo Practice Management matches that workflow by tying scheduling, treatment plan steps, and discharge artifacts together. If end-to-end scheduling plus rehab documentation must work across multiple care settings and locations, Net Health aligns to multi-location governance.
Select the documentation execution style based on therapy-first vs schedule-first workflows
If clinicians need therapy documentation templates that map directly to daily notes and episode artifacts, WebPT aligns to a therapy-first charting flow with scheduling and patient messaging for visit execution. If documentation should follow scheduling into care plan and progress artifacts with heavier workflow structure, Net Health centers clinical documentation flows from scheduling.
Decide whether outcomes live inside the rehab workflow or require mapping across reporting
If functional outcome measures and impairment tracking must automatically carry through progress reporting and episode closeout, Clinicient INSIGHT keeps outcomes within the same workflow. If outcomes reporting must summarize functional measures from recorded patient data while maintaining episode-linked linkage across evaluations and progress notes, Jane provides that linkage.
Validate template governance workload for complex clinic documentation standards
If clinic documentation standards are complex and template configuration effort must stay controlled, avoid assuming that template customization is lightweight because Jane warns that template configuration effort can be significant. If configurable note structures with minimal custom development matter, HENO supports a configurable episode timeline builder that still requires governance to avoid inconsistent documentation.
Stress-test interoperability expectations against the published interoperability posture
If external systems expect strict schemas, Apollo Practice Management’s FHIR-style interoperability needs planning because strict schema expectations can create implementation overhead. If interoperability and automation depth lag behind integration-first systems, Raintree and Exercise Pro shift more work into setup and alignment.
Rehab clinic types and governance models that match each workflow pattern
Episode-aligned documentation reduces rekeying when scheduling, evaluations, treatment plans, and discharge artifacts live in one thread. The right tool depends on whether governance sits with one clinic, multiple locations, or therapy teams that manage templates daily.
Outpatient rehab clinics that run episode-aligned scheduling and need discharge-ready outputs from the same record thread
Apollo Practice Management ties episode workflow to scheduling plus treatment plan steps and produces discharge-ready documentation from that same thread, which supports consistent closeout.
Rehab organizations with multiple locations that require scheduling plus documentation governance across settings
Net Health supports end-to-end scheduling and clinical documentation flows across multi-location governance, which helps standardize care plan and progress artifacts.
Clinics that need functional outcomes and impairment tracking carried through to progress reporting and episode closure without switching systems
Clinicient INSIGHT integrates functional outcome measures and impairment tracking so those fields feed progress reporting and episode closeout within one workflow.
Outpatient clinics that want one episode workflow from intake through progress reporting and outcomes tracking
Jane ties evaluations, treatment plans, and progress notes to the same care window and then summarizes functional measures from recorded patient data.
Therapy teams that prefer configurable episode note sequences rather than deep template customization projects
HENO builds an episode timeline that links evaluation, treatment plan updates, and daily treatment documentation into a configurable sequence.
Common acquisition pitfalls that derail episode documentation consistency
Rehabilitation software purchases fail when template governance and integration expectations are not stress-tested against real clinic documentation variations. Misalignment usually appears as rekeying across workflows, inconsistent episode sequencing, or delays in interoperability workstreams.
Assuming episode linkage is automatic across scheduling, treatment plans, and discharge artifacts without governance planning
Apollo Practice Management ties those steps together, but deep template customization can add governance overhead for admins, so a template governance plan must be part of implementation scoping.
Underestimating the configuration discipline needed to keep templates and scheduling rules consistent across locations
Net Health can require strong configuration discipline across templates and scheduling rules, so multi-location rollout timelines must include template and scheduling-rule alignment work.
Choosing an interoperability posture based only on feature lists instead of workflow readiness
Raintree’s standout documentation flow can still lag in API and automation depth, so integration timelines must account for setup and alignment rather than expecting universal data exchange.
Overlooking template mapping effort when measures differ by clinic
Jane supports episode-linked documentation and outcomes reporting, but cross-tool reporting may require careful mapping when measures differ by clinic.
Treating functional outcomes coverage as equivalent to clinical documentation depth
Clinicient INSIGHT carries functional outcome and impairment tracking through progress reporting, but documentation depth can increase time-to-familiarity for new sites, so training and rollout sequencing must match that learning curve.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Apollo Practice Management, Net Health, Jane, WebPT, Raintree, Clinicient INSIGHT, HENO, Exercise Pro, TheraOffice, and Rehab Optima using feature coverage, ease of use, and value for rehab operations. Features carried a 40 percent weight, ease carried a 30 percent weight, and value carried a 30 percent weight.
Apollo Practice Management earned the top rank because its episode of care workflow ties scheduling, treatment plan steps, and discharge-ready documentation into one patient record thread. The ranking also reflected how each tool handles episode-linked documentation from initial evaluation through progress artifacts to discharge outputs, with Net Health and Jane providing strong episode orientation across operational workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About rehabilitation software
How do episode-of-care workflows differ across TherapyPartner, Net Health, and Jane?
Which tool is better when rehab clinics need discipline-specific documentation flows without custom development?
How does clinician workload flow change from initial evaluation to daily treatment notes and discharge summaries?
What breaks if documentation and scheduling are not tied to the same visit or episode record?
When does multi-location governance become a deciding factor between Net Health, Jane, and TherapyPartner?
How do therapy scheduling and patient intake workflows connect to outcomes and progress reporting in Exercise Pro and WebPT?
How do tools handle care-plan updates when clinicians must revise treatment goals mid-episode?
What is the operational tradeoff between HENO’s configurable episode timeline and TheraOffice’s template-based charting?
How do admin controls and automation differ across Apollo Practice Management and Clinicient INSIGHT?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Physical Therapist Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Patient Referral Software of 2026
- Sports RecreationTop 10 Best Recreation Software of 2026
- Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Medical Speech Recognition Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Reimbursement Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Healthcare Medicine alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of healthcare medicine tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare healthcare medicine tools→