GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
HR In IndustryTop 10 Best Labor Allocation Software of 2026
Top 10 labor allocation software ranking for workforce planning and scheduling, with tools like UKG Pro, Legion, and Homebase compared for teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
UKG Pro Workforce Management is the best fit for customers who need rule-governed scheduling and approvals that stay consistent with time capture, while Homebase is a strong low-friction entry for hourly teams that must approve shifts fast, and Quinyx works best when you want automated allocation with approval control and better reconciliation.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
UKG Pro Workforce Management
Schedule approval workflows tied to operational audit logs for traceable staffing changes across planning cycles.
Built for fits when UKG Pro customers need rule-governed scheduling and approvals tied to time capture consistency..
Legion
Editor pickLegion’s allocation workflow ties rule-driven staffing decisions to approval steps per planning period.
Built for fits when multi-location teams need governed labor allocation with approvals and actual-versus-planned reconciliation..
Homebase
Editor pickShift approvals and team lead workflows for swap and coverage changes, tied to time tracking reconciliation.
Built for fits when hourly teams need fast scheduling, shift approvals, and reconciliation of planned versus actual hours..
Related reading
Comparison Table
UKG Pro Workforce Management
enterpriseUKG Pro Workforce Management covers scheduling, forecasting, timekeeping, and labor analytics.
Schedule approval workflows tied to operational audit logs for traceable staffing changes across planning cycles.
UKG Pro Workforce Management is geared toward labor distribution and operational scheduling where demand inputs drive staffing assignments under constraint logic. The system handles approval workflows for schedule changes and provides traceability through operational audit logs for staffing decisions. It also benefits from native linkage to time and attendance and payroll processes within UKG Pro, which reduces reconciliation gaps between planned labor and recorded work.
A practical tradeoff is that effective allocation rules and governance require disciplined setup of labor standards, shift templates, and approval paths so planners can avoid rule conflicts. It fits best for organizations already running UKG Pro for HR core and payroll, where workforce planning and scheduling must stay consistent with time capture and downstream reporting.
- +Constraint-based scheduling that respects skills, availability, and labor rules
- +Approval workflows for schedule changes with operational audit trails
- +Tighter consistency between planned schedules and UKG Pro time capture
- +Scenario planning to test demand changes before schedule commitment
- –Rule and approval configuration takes sustained governance discipline
- –Cross-system exceptions require process work when time capture is not UKG-based
- –Planner experience depends on clean templates and naming conventions
Plant operations schedulers
Shift plans with labor constraints
Fewer overtime overruns
Workforce planners
Demand scenario staffing tests
Faster staffing decisions
Show 2 more scenarios
HR operations leaders
Consistent labor records
Lower reconciliation effort
UKG Pro linkage keeps schedule outcomes aligned with time capture and downstream labor reporting.
Finance operations teams
Allocation-ready labor data
Reduced labor variance
Schedule and labor rule outputs provide a clearer basis for cost-center and department labor tracking.
Best for: Fits when UKG Pro customers need rule-governed scheduling and approvals tied to time capture consistency.
More related reading
Legion
enterpriseLegion uses demand forecasts, employee preferences, and operational rules to create labor schedules.
Legion’s allocation workflow ties rule-driven staffing decisions to approval steps per planning period.
Legion supports labor forecasting inputs and workload modeling so planners can generate staffing requirements and translate them into shift and allocation plans. Allocation rules can account for availability constraints and role fit while keeping approvals tied to specific planning periods. Integration coverage focuses on syncing schedules and time capture so planned versus actual labor can drive variance analysis for the next scenario.
A practical tradeoff is that Legion’s configuration of allocation rules and constraint logic can take meaningful upfront governance to keep outcomes consistent across departments. Legion fits teams that run recurring planning cycles and need audit-friendly approvals tied to labor distribution decisions, such as multi-location operations with recurring headcount changes.
- +Allocation rules maintain role fit and availability constraints
- +Planned versus actual reconciliation improves variance analysis loops
- +Approval workflows keep planners and managers aligned per cycle
- +Integrations reduce manual transfer of schedule and time data
- –Rule and constraint configuration needs disciplined governance
- –Complex multi-site scenarios can lengthen planning run times
- –Scenario comparisons require more planner attention to inputs
- –Some advanced reporting needs tighter process setup to stay clean
Workforce planning teams
Translate demand scenarios into staffed allocations
Faster staffing decisions with traceability
Operations managers
Control labor distribution across locations
Lower planning rework
Show 2 more scenarios
Scheduling coordinators
Reconcile shifts against time capture
More accurate next-cycle staffing
Legion syncs time and attendance inputs to compare planned allocations with actual coverage.
Finance and job costing teams
Track labor cost allocation by assignment
Clearer cost-center labor reporting
Allocation results can be mapped to cost centers for actual-versus-planned labor visibility.
Best for: Fits when multi-location teams need governed labor allocation with approvals and actual-versus-planned reconciliation.
Homebase
SMBHomebase combines hourly employee scheduling, time tracking, payroll support, and team messaging.
Shift approvals and team lead workflows for swap and coverage changes, tied to time tracking reconciliation.
Homebase uses shift templates, availability rules, and swap and approval workflows to route staffing decisions through managers and team leads. Labor allocation is represented as assignable shift coverage with constraints like role or location and scheduling windows that reduce over-allocation risk. Time tracking data feeds schedule reconciliation so teams can compare planned versus actual hours for operational variance reviews.
A tradeoff appears when organizations need detailed project costing or cost-center allocation beyond hourly labor scheduling. Homebase fits situations where teams manage frequent schedule changes, approve adjustments, and want automated reporting on staffing utilization for daily operations.
- +Availability-driven shift assignment reduces manual coverage back-and-forth
- +Schedule approval workflows add governance for frequent changes
- +Clocked-time reconciliation supports planned versus actual hours reviews
- +Multi-location operations support consistent scheduling patterns
- –Complex skills-based assignment needs external role modeling
- –API and automation depth may not match enterprise workforce planning suites
- –Workload modeling and scenario planning are limited for long-range forecasts
- –Advanced allocation by cost center or job costing is not the primary focus
Restaurant ops managers
Approve schedule swaps and coverage
Fewer understaffed shifts
Multi-location retail supervisors
Coordinate staffing across locations
Lower scheduling variance
Show 2 more scenarios
HR and compliance leads
Audit schedule changes and approvals
Stronger change accountability
Approval trails support internal review of who changed a schedule and when it was authorized.
Workforce analysts
Review staffing utilization weekly
Better labor planning feedback
Reconciliation reporting highlights gaps between planned coverage and clocked time per shift.
Best for: Fits when hourly teams need fast scheduling, shift approvals, and reconciliation of planned versus actual hours.
Deputy
enterpriseDeputy combines labor scheduling, availability management, time tracking, and payroll preparation.
Approval-driven scheduling workflows that connect requested shift changes to employee timesheets for audit-ready history.
Deputy combines shift scheduling with time and attendance workflows, then adds labor allocation controls through role-based staff assignments and approvals. The system supports manager driven scheduling changes, employee swap handling, and clock-in to timesheet reconciliation when integrated with payroll and accounting setups.
Deputy’s automation surface centers on configurable rules for staffing requests, shift coverage, and approval states across scheduled work and recorded hours. Reporting focuses on planned versus actual patterns that feed staffing adjustments and variance discussions.
- +Built-in shift scheduling plus time capture in one workflow
- +Configurable approvals and coverage handling for staffing changes
- +Integrates scheduling data into timesheets to reduce reconciliation effort
- +Granular permissioning for managers versus employees
- –Labor planning depth depends on add-ons and integration scope
- –Workload allocation requires careful rule setup across roles and locations
- –Scenario modeling for headcount and capacity is limited versus forecasting-first tools
- –Multi-system deployments can create mapping overhead for labor attributes
Best for: Fits when operations teams need scheduling, approvals, and time reconciliation for labor distribution across locations.
Quinyx
enterpriseQuinyx provides workforce planning, demand forecasting, scheduling, and labor optimization.
Manager-facing planning boards that accept exception changes and feed approved re-planning without losing audit history.
Quinyx performs labor allocation by generating and adjusting work plans tied to real-time capacity and shift constraints. Core capabilities include workforce demand planning inputs, automated scheduling logic, and rule-based allocation across roles and skill requirements.
The system supports approvals and change tracking so managers can control staffing adjustments without losing historical context. Quinyx also integrates with time-and-attendance and payroll-related systems to reduce manual reconciliation between schedules and recorded labor.
- +Rule-based allocation supports skill and constraint-driven staffing decisions
- +Work plan adjustments flow through approval steps with visible change history
- +Integrations reduce manual reconciliation between scheduling and recorded labor
- +Scenario planning helps compare staffing outcomes against cost and coverage targets
- –Advanced configuration requires governance to keep allocation rules consistent
- –Reporting depth can depend on the quality of underlying master data
- –Some scheduling workflows need more clicks to reach exception handling
- –Automation tuning takes time when staffing volumes and roles change
Best for: Fits when mid-size and enterprise teams need automated allocation with approval control and integration-driven reconciliation.
Float
professional servicesFloat provides resource scheduling, capacity planning, project allocation, and utilization reporting.
Assignment workflows combine availability, role constraints, and approval steps inside one roster editing flow.
Float targets teams that need practical shift planning and headcount coverage views without building a custom scheduling stack. Core functions include role-based availability capture, drag-and-drop shift assignments, and rule-driven approvals for staffing changes.
It also supports integrations that connect schedules to calendars and time-and-attendance workflows, reducing manual reconciliation. Float’s reporting centers on utilization and allocation visibility across teams and time periods.
- +Drag-and-drop scheduling with clear coverage gaps and exception visibility.
- +Role and assignment controls that fit common approvals for roster changes.
- +Calendar-oriented integrations that reduce manual shift re-entry.
- +Utilization-focused reporting for planned versus assigned workload views.
- –Scenario planning for staffing requirements is limited compared with forecasting-first systems.
- –Deeper governance like detailed audit trails may require process discipline.
- –Skills-based assignment needs careful setup of roles and constraints.
- –API automation can be constrained for complex labor modeling workflows.
Best for: Fits when mid-size teams need visual shift planning and allocation visibility with calendar and time integrations.
7shifts
vertical specialist7shifts provides restaurant scheduling, labor budgeting, time tracking, and team communication.
Schedule change approvals with role-based permissions that control who can edit assignments per shift.
7shifts focuses on shift scheduling with labor allocation controls that link staffing needs to real coverage across locations. It supports availability rules, assignment workflows, and change approvals that help keep coverage aligned with demand.
The system also ties schedules to time tracking workflows for review of actual coverage and staffing variance. Automation is centered on schedule builds and recurring staffing patterns rather than full workforce-demand forecasting engines.
- +Built for practical shift scheduling with assignment-level labor controls
- +Approval workflow keeps schedule changes under admin governance
- +Time tracking links to scheduling views for fast coverage review
- +Multi-location scheduling supports consistent staffing rules
- –Limited workforce-demand planning and scenario forecasting depth
- –Advanced skills-based assignment requires careful role and rule setup
- –API and automation surface is narrower than full workforce suite products
- –Audit trail coverage is strong for scheduling events but not activity costing
Best for: Fits when staffing managers need enforceable shift coverage workflows across locations.
Connecteam
SMBConnecteam combines employee scheduling, job assignments, time tracking, and field workforce communication.
Assignment workflows can trigger manager approvals and status updates across mobile tasks in one configuration flow.
Connecteam centers labor allocation around shift and task workflows delivered through employee mobile access. Managers can assign tasks and track execution status in the same place, which reduces handoffs between scheduling and time capture.
The product also supports approvals and change control for operational updates that affect staffing plans. Connecteam further connects scheduling-related work to timesheet and workforce records via integrations and exports rather than keeping allocation isolated in spreadsheets.
- +Mobile-first task assignment with live status visibility for supervisors
- +Built-in approvals for staffing plan changes tied to operational actions
- +Workflow configuration supports conditional task routing by role and location
- +Integrations and exports reduce data duplication between planning and time records
- –Allocation logic is more workflow oriented than rules engine oriented
- –Advanced skills-based assignment requires careful configuration of user attributes
- –Audit detail depends on admin settings and may need process discipline
- –Scenario planning depth is limited compared with dedicated workforce planning tools
Best for: Fits when operations teams need mobile task allocation tied to approvals and time capture.
RotaCloud
SMBRotaCloud handles rota creation, employee availability, leave, time tracking, and shift changes.
Approval-based change control for rosters, including a structured audit trail of who altered coverage and when.
RotaCloud schedules staff by converting workforce rules into shift-ready rosters and availability-aware assignments. Core workflow support covers shift scheduling, labor distribution across locations, and approvals that route changes through designated roles.
The solution focuses on operational scheduling needs like call-offs and day-to-day coverage rather than only forecasting outputs. Integration support centers on connecting schedules and attendance signals with external HR and time systems through its available API and integration points.
- +Rule-driven roster generation supports allocation logic beyond manual shift edits.
- +Approval workflows track schedule changes through defined authorizations.
- +Availability and constraints reduce avoidable conflicts during assignment.
- +Integration options and API support help connect schedules with external systems.
- –Complex constraint sets can require careful configuration to avoid unexpected coverage gaps.
- –Advanced skills-based assignment requires disciplined setup of eligibility data.
- –Scenario planning depth for staffing alternatives is limited compared with dedicated demand-planning suites.
- –Audit history coverage is narrower for non-standard scheduling modifications.
Best for: Fits when operations teams need fast, rule-based rosters with approvals and external time-system alignment.
Runn
professional servicesRunn combines resource scheduling, project forecasting, capacity planning, and utilization analysis.
Constraint-aware allocation that ties staffing plan demand to assignable resources with approval-gated changes.
Runn supports labor allocation workflows built around staffing plans, shift coverage, and capacity trade-offs. It focuses on scheduling inputs like roles, availability constraints, and assignment rules, then drives allocation outcomes into day-to-day execution views. Runn is distinct for operational planning that connects forecast-style demand to assignable resources instead of treating scheduling as a separate process.
- +Allocation rules help convert demand into assignments with fewer manual passes
- +Scenario planning supports quick what-if comparisons for coverage gaps
- +Role and constraint modeling reduces mismatches in shift coverage
- +Approval workflows add a control layer for planned versus changed assignments
- –Integration surface for time and attendance is narrower than many labor suite options
- –Workflows require careful configuration of constraints to avoid silent assignment failures
- –Audit trail depth is limited compared with enterprise workforce platforms
- –Large multi-department planning can feel slow when rebalancing many assignments
Best for: Fits when staffing managers need constraint-aware allocation scenarios that feed operational shift coverage.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 hr in industry, UKG Pro Workforce Management stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right labor allocation software
Labor allocation software coordinates staffing demand with assignable labor by turning planned coverage into governed shift assignments and auditable change histories. This guide covers UKG Pro Workforce Management, Legion, and the rest of the ten tools from the buyer shortlist.
Across the set, the differentiator is how planning decisions move through approvals, how planned-versus-actual reconciliation is handled, and how scheduling changes connect back to time capture. Tools covered include Homebase, Deputy, Quinyx, Float, 7shifts, Connecteam, RotaCloud, and Runn.
Labor allocation software for governed shift planning, approvals, and planned-versus-actual reconciliation
Labor allocation software translates labor forecasting and staffing requirements into schedules and allocations that follow constraint rules like skills, availability, and labor standards. It also keeps labor distribution traceable by recording schedule changes with approval workflows tied to operational audit logs and time capture, as shown in UKG Pro Workforce Management.
The stronger systems connect allocation or roster edits to planned-versus-actual reconciliation so variance analysis can feed the next planning cycle, as illustrated by Legion’s planned versus actual reconciliation loop. Other tools focus more on roster editing workflows and operational governance, like Float’s drag-and-drop assignment flow with visible coverage gaps and exception visibility.
Governed allocation workflows, approvals, and reconciliation controls
Labor allocation software earns operational trust when every shift change can be traced from planning intent to executed time capture. UKG Pro Workforce Management, Legion, and other shortlisted tools show this through approval workflows that connect roster decisions to auditable staffing history.
The second differentiator is whether planned-versus-actual reconciliation closes the loop back to allocation rules. Legion’s planned versus actual reconciliation strengthens variance analysis loops, while Float and Homebase focus more on roster editing visibility like coverage gaps and exception handling.
Approval-gated scheduling changes with traceable audit history
UKG Pro Workforce Management ties schedule approval workflows to operational audit logs so traceable staffing changes persist across planning cycles. RotaCloud also emphasizes structured audit trail control for roster changes with defined authorizations.
Constraint-based allocation that respects skills, availability, and labor rules
UKG Pro Workforce Management uses constraint-based scheduling that respects skills, availability, and labor rules. Quinyx and RotaCloud also support rule-driven roster generation where skills and eligibility data drive allocation outcomes.
Planned-versus-actual reconciliation for variance-driven re-planning
Legion connects governance to reconciliation so planned versus actual tracking improves variance analysis loops. Runn’s scenario planning supports quick what-if comparisons for coverage gaps that relate planning demand to assignable resources.
Approval workflows linked to time capture and timesheet alignment
Deputy connects requested shift changes to employee timesheets so approval history aligns with time reconciliation. Homebase and 7shifts emphasize schedule approvals that keep shift changes governed and easier to reconcile with time tracking.
Multi-location planning controls with governed allocation decisions
Legion targets multi-location teams with allocation workflows that include approval steps per planning period. Deputy supports scheduling and approvals for labor distribution across locations while keeping coverage handling configurable.
Manager planning boards and change history during exception re-planning
Quinyx provides manager-facing planning boards that accept exception changes and feed approved re-planning without losing change history. Legion also ties allocation rules to approval steps per planning period so exceptions remain controlled in the same workflow.
Pick allocation governance based on workflow ownership and reconciliation depth
The correct fit depends on where allocation governance should live. Some tools center governance in enterprise planning with approval history tied to operational audit logs, while others center governance in roster editing workflows where managers approve coverage changes and then reconcile time.
A second decision fork is whether the organization needs planned-versus-actual reconciliation to drive the next planning cycle. Tools like Legion treat reconciliation as a core loop, while Float and Homebase lean toward visual roster control such as coverage gaps and exception visibility.
Choose the governance checkpoint that must be auditable
Select UKG Pro Workforce Management when scheduling approvals must attach to operational audit logs so staffing changes remain traceable across planning cycles. Select RotaCloud when roster change control needs structured authorizations and an audit trail tied to who altered coverage and when.
Decide where approvals should connect in the workflow
Select Deputy when requested shift changes must connect to employee timesheets so audit-ready history sits alongside time reconciliation. Select 7shifts when approval-gated edit permissions per shift are the primary enforcement mechanism for managers.
Confirm whether planned-versus-actual reconciliation drives re-planning
Select Legion when planned-versus-actual reconciliation needs to improve variance analysis loops so allocation rules tighten each cycle. Select Float when roster editing and exception visibility are the planning focus and reconciliation is less central to re-planning logic.
Test constraint depth against real eligibility complexity
Select UKG Pro Workforce Management when constraint-based scheduling must respect skills, availability, and labor rules under sustained governance discipline. Select Quinyx when rule-based allocation must handle skill and constraint-driven staffing decisions while preserving approval-controlled change history.
Validate planning performance for multi-site run cadence
Select Legion when multi-location governed allocation decisions must include approvals and planned-versus-actual reconciliation even if rule configuration needs disciplined governance. Select Homebase when fast shift approvals and team lead swap or coverage changes matter more than deep enterprise planning runs.
Match the team work style to allocation editing surfaces
Select Quinyx or Float when managers need planning boards or drag-and-drop roster editing with visible coverage gaps and exception handling. Select Connecteam when mobile-first task allocation with manager approval triggers and status updates fits daily supervisor workflows.
Who should shortlist these labor allocation tools
Labor allocation software fits teams that must translate staffing requirements into governed shift assignments with approvals and reconciliation. The shortlist here targets organizations where operational accuracy depends on consistent rules application and traceable scheduling changes.
The best match depends on whether the organization treats workforce planning as an audit-governed process or a roster editing workflow that still produces reconciliation-ready outcomes.
Enterprises standardizing rule-governed scheduling across planning cycles
UKG Pro Workforce Management fits teams that need constraint-based scheduling with approval workflows tied to operational audit logs so staffing decisions stay traceable end to end.
Multi-location operations teams running variance-driven staffing improvements
Legion fits when planned-versus-actual reconciliation must feed allocation decisions per planning period with approval steps tied to rule-driven staffing choices.
Hourly workforce teams that must keep approvals fast during frequent swaps and coverage changes
Homebase fits teams that prioritize shift approvals and team lead swap and coverage changes tied to time tracking reconciliation with availability-driven shift assignment.
Operations groups that need scheduling requests to land cleanly in timesheets
Deputy fits when employee timesheets must reflect approved shift changes so labor distribution across locations stays audit-ready through the same workflow.
Mid-size and enterprise managers who plan by exception using planning boards
Quinyx fits when managers need exception-driven re-planning with approval control and visible change history so allocation rules remain consistent after edits.
Common pitfalls in labor allocation software selection and rollout
Teams often underestimate how much governance discipline the allocation rules require after roles, eligibility, and labor constraints go live. Several tools explicitly depend on sustained rule setup to avoid approval workflow churn and planning drift.
Teams also misjudge how planning surfaces map to reconciliation outcomes. Tools that excel at roster editing and shift approvals can still be a weaker fit when the organization expects a tight planned-versus-actual feedback loop.
Picking a rules-first product but treating constraint setup as one-time configuration
UKG Pro Workforce Management and Legion both require sustained governance discipline to keep rule and approval configuration consistent across planning runs.
Expecting advanced skills-based assignment to work without disciplined role and eligibility modeling
Float and Homebase note that complex skills-based assignment needs external role modeling, while 7shifts and RotaCloud require careful eligibility data setup for advanced skills-based assignment.
Assuming approval workflows automatically guarantee planned-versus-actual variance improvement
Legion ties planned versus actual reconciliation directly to variance analysis loops, while Float focuses more on roster editing and exception visibility than scenario planning for staffing requirements.
Under-scoping integration or add-ons for workforce planning depth
Deputy flags that labor planning depth can depend on add-ons and integration scope, so selecting it without time and attendance alignment can limit workload allocation outcomes.
Using constraint-based allocation tools without validating constraint failure modes
Runn warns that workflows require careful configuration of constraints to avoid silent assignment failures, so constraint tests must run before real demand is scheduled.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each shortlisted vendor on feature coverage for governed labor allocation, approval workflows, and planned-versus-actual reconciliation. Features accounted for 40% of the score, and ease of use and value each accounted for 30% of the score.
UKG Pro Workforce Management ranked highest because schedule approval workflows tie to operational audit logs for traceable staffing changes across planning cycles. Its constraint-based scheduling that respects skills, availability, and labor rules also reduces manual rework during shift assignment governance compared with roster-first tools like Float and shift-editing workflows like 7shifts.
Frequently Asked Questions About labor allocation software
How do UKG Pro Workforce Management and Legion differ in getting from labor forecasting to daily assignments?
Which tools provide allocation work that passes through shift approvals and audit trails?
What breaks if a labor allocation system cannot reconcile posted schedules with time-and-attendance data?
How do RotaCloud and Legion handle call-offs or coverage changes during active operations?
When do skill constraints and role-based rules materially change allocation outcomes?
Which systems support administrator controls for managing planners and configuration changes across planning cycles?
How do 7shifts and Homebase differ in the workflow emphasis for assignment changes?
What integration patterns show up most often between scheduling, time capture, and payroll handoff?
How does RotaCloud’s API support external system alignment compared with Float’s approach?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
HR In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of hr in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare hr in industry tools→