GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Healthcare MedicineTop 10 Best Hme Dme Software of 2026
Top 10 hme dme software ranking with side-by-side feature comparisons for HME/DME billing and operations, including TIMS Software, Procura, TeamDME.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
TIMS Software is the best fit if you run a multi-staff HME business that needs automation from order capture through denial-ready claim artifacts, whereas Procura works better when your priority is controlled order-to-claim workflows with audit-ready documentation ties.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
TIMS Software
Order-to-document workflow coordination that keeps physician order intent aligned with medical necessity and delivery evidence.
Built for fits when multi-staff HME operations need automation from order capture to denial-ready claim artifacts..
Procura
Editor pickStructured physician order and documentation handling that keeps claim packet completeness attached to each order.
Built for fits when HME teams need controlled order-to-claim workflows with audit-ready documentation ties..
TeamDME
Editor pickConfigurable record routing that links intake documents to downstream claims tasks and user responsibilities.
Built for fits when mid-size DME teams need intake-to-claims traceability with governed multi-user workflows..
Related reading
Comparison Table
TIMS Software
vertical specialistUnified HME/DME business management system connecting financials, inventory, sales, and delivery.
Order-to-document workflow coordination that keeps physician order intent aligned with medical necessity and delivery evidence.
TIMS Software centers on the operational loop that drives durable medical equipment fulfillment workflows. The core experience includes patient intake capture, physician order management processes, and document assembly for medical necessity and proof-of-delivery expectations. Eligibility checks and claim readiness tooling reduce manual handoffs by keeping payer context close to claims work.
A key tradeoff is that TIMS Software requires deliberate setup of item mapping and workflow rules so claims artifacts match each payer and product line. It fits teams with consistent supply catalogs and repeating order patterns, where automation can keep clinicians and billing staff aligned without constant re-keying.
- +End-to-end documentation workflow links orders to proof-of-delivery outputs
- +Payer eligibility checks sit directly in the pre-claim workflow
- +Operational configuration supports multi-role and multi-site processing
- +Activity tracking supports operational review during claim disputes
- –Initial workflow and item mapping setup takes time for new product lines
- –External EHR and clearinghouse integrations can add project scope
Billing operations managers
Reduce claim rework from missing documents
Fewer denials from omissions
Clinical intake teams
Standardize physician order data capture
Faster order-to-claim readiness
Show 2 more scenarios
Revenue cycle analysts
Triage exceptions from claim disputes
Quicker root-cause analysis
Activity tracking helps trace operational steps behind remittance outcomes and denial reasons.
Multi-location operations staff
Run consistent workflows across sites
Lower cross-site variance
Configuration and access controls support standardized processing for shared catalogs.
Best for: Fits when multi-staff HME operations need automation from order capture to denial-ready claim artifacts.
More related reading
Procura
enterpriseHome medical equipment and home health software with billing and clinical documentation.
Structured physician order and documentation handling that keeps claim packet completeness attached to each order.
Procura is built around the durable equipment lifecycle, including intake, order processing, and documentation capture that ties into claim readiness. It supports physician order management and the associated medical necessity workflow used to assemble claim packets. Built-in guidance for eligibility and claim status workflows reduces manual lookup effort during high-volume cycles.
A tradeoff appears in workflow configuration and document mapping, which can take time for teams with unusual internal processes. Procura is a strong fit for an established HME provider that runs consistent referral and order intake patterns and wants tighter control over documentation completeness before claims move forward.
- +Order to claim workflows stay connected through structured documentation
- +Authorization and eligibility steps reduce manual status chasing
- +Denials and aging reporting supports targeted follow-up work
- +Automation for recurring supply and follow-up reduces routine labor
- –Document and workflow mapping requires disciplined setup work
- –Complex edge cases can still require manual queue management
- –Reporting coverage depends on how fields are configured upstream
- –Navigation speed can drop when users manage many parallel orders
Revenue cycle teams
Reduce claim packet rework and denials
Fewer resubmissions and faster clears
Clinical intake coordinators
Standardize orders from referrals
Lower back-and-forth during setup
Show 2 more scenarios
Operations managers
Coordinate recurring supply replenishment
More consistent recurring fulfillment
Operations track replenishment cycles and follow-up states across ongoing equipment usage.
Billing supervisors
Run denial and aging follow-ups
Higher follow-up throughput
Supervisors prioritize follow-up using reporting views tied to claim outcomes and timelines.
Best for: Fits when HME teams need controlled order-to-claim workflows with audit-ready documentation ties.
TeamDME
SMBCloud software for DME intake, billing, inventory, delivery scheduling, and documentation.
Configurable record routing that links intake documents to downstream claims tasks and user responsibilities.
TeamDME routes data from referral and order intake into downstream billing tasks, which reduces re-keying between teams. It supports recurring supply workflows and proof-of-delivery artifacts that billing teams need for payer review. The platform’s governance controls help assign roles across intake, documentation, and claims work, which matters when multiple clinics or locations share one workspace.
A key tradeoff is that organizations with highly customized internal processes may spend time aligning TeamDME forms and routing rules to their current SOPs. TeamDME fits best when operations teams need end-to-end visibility from referral intake to claim submission artifacts, not when they only need standalone claim editing.
- +End-to-end workflow from intake through claims documentation artifacts
- +Role-based task routing separates intake, documentation, and billing work
- +Automation for repeating supply and order-related operational steps
- +Operational auditability for who handled which record and when
- –Workflow configuration takes longer for teams with nonstandard intake forms
- –Some specialized maintenance and repair workflows need tighter process mapping
- –Complex multi-location setups require careful permission design to avoid friction
Clinic operations teams
Automated intake routing and documentation capture
Fewer missed documents
DME billing teams
Claims preparation with traceable evidence
Lower rework after denials
Show 2 more scenarios
Revenue operations leaders
Governed multi-user workflows by role
Better operational control
Admin controls manage access to intake, documentation, and submission tasks across shared workspaces.
Supply management staff
Recurring supply order execution
More consistent fulfillment
Teams schedule and manage recurring supply steps with order-linked documentation for billing follow-through.
Best for: Fits when mid-size DME teams need intake-to-claims traceability with governed multi-user workflows.
ComputCare
SMBDME and HME software platform with point-of-sale, billing, and inventory modules.
Workflow-driven order status and staff task queues keep every order in an explicit fulfillment sequence with linked documents.
ComputCare is a home medical equipment and durable medical equipment management suite focused on operational workflows around referrals, orders, and patient delivery. It supports the end-to-end movement of a job from intake to fulfillment with status tracking and document handling that reduce manual handoffs.
Administrative tooling centers on staff assignment, task visibility, and audit-ready activity trails for changes to orders and related records. Automation is geared toward reducing repeated steps in common DMEPOS processes such as order updates and recurring work queues.
- +Order lifecycle tracking ties intake, fulfillment, and documentation into one workflow
- +Staff task queues make handoffs visible without spreadsheets or email threads
- +Document management keeps supporting records associated with the right order
- +Audit trails track operational changes across order and patient activity
- –Automation coverage depends on configuration of workflow steps and statuses
- –Integration depth for external EHR and clearinghouse workflows can be limited by available connectors
- –Complex payer rule handling may require additional process design outside core screens
- –Role-based governance controls are less granular for highly segmented teams
Best for: Fits when mid-size HME or DMEPOS operators need workflow-centric order management with internal tracking and documentation controls.
Brightree
enterpriseCloud software for HME providers covering intake, billing, inventory, and clinical workflows.
Order-to-document execution ties clinical packet creation and proof capture directly to each patient case.
Brightree handles end-to-end DMEPOS and home medical workflows, including referrals, clinical documentation, and Medicare-facing claim processes. The system centers on case-based order and patient management tied to billing activities, which reduces handoff gaps between intake, authorization, and claims.
Automation features support recurring supply ordering and document generation for medical necessity and proof of delivery. Brightree also provides integration points for EHR and clearinghouse connectivity to move eligibility, orders, and claim data through the operational pipeline.
- +Case-based workflow connects referrals, orders, and billing tasks
- +Recurring supply ordering supports managed inventory and repeat fulfillment
- +Document generation supports medical necessity and proof of delivery packages
- +Integration options support clearinghouse and EHR data movement
- –Setup effort is high because configuration must match payer rules
- –Workflow depth can slow new users without role-based training
- –Automation coverage varies by order type and documentation requirements
- –Advanced reporting depends on consistent data entry discipline
Best for: Fits when mid-size DMEPOS organizations need controlled referral-to-claims workflows.
NikoHealth
vertical specialistCloud-based DME software for order intake, billing, inventory, delivery, and patient management.
Order-to-document automation that generates payer-ready documentation artifacts tied to each order lifecycle stage.
NikoHealth targets home medical equipment and durable medical equipment workflows with a focus on clinical documentation tied to order execution. It combines referral and physician order intake with document tracking used to support eligibility, medical necessity, and payer submission readiness.
The solution’s differentiator is automation around downstream paperwork and delivery-ready artifacts rather than only claim creation screens. Integrations and API access matter for teams that need to connect patient intake data, order status updates, and submission events across systems.
- +Workflow automation ties orders to documentation deliverables
- +Order and referral intake supports consistent physician documentation flow
- +Audit trails for document edits reduce compliance handling friction
- +Integration and API support for syncing order and status events
- –Complex configurations need governance to avoid inconsistent documentation paths
- –Less emphasis on deep inventory and serialized asset controls
- –Reporting depth depends on how events and document types are modeled
- –Some payer-specific exceptions require manual routing steps
Best for: Fits when HME and DME teams need automated documentation workflows tied to order execution.
DMEWorks
vertical specialistDME management software supporting billing, inventory, documentation, and regulatory workflows.
Exception handling tied to order readiness that flags blockers before downstream billing work starts
DMEWorks is an HME and DMEPOS workflow system focused on front-end operational intake through fulfillment. Core modules center on orders, physician and documentation workflows, and exception handling that supports payer submission readiness.
The application also supports operational tracking around deliveries and changes in service conditions. Administrative controls support multi-role usage for day-to-day clerical work and back-office claim processing.
- +Order-to-fulfillment workflow links clerical steps into a single operational path
- +Documentation workflow reduces handoffs by keeping requests and statuses in one place
- +Exception handling highlights blockers before claims move forward
- +Role-based access supports separate responsibilities across intake and billing teams
- –Deep payer-specific configuration can require careful governance to stay consistent
- –Less emphasis on advanced automation templates than some workflow-first competitors
- –Audit visibility across every field-level change is not as granular as high-compliance stacks
- –Integration options depend on custom connectivity for system-of-record environments
Best for: Fits when mid-size DME teams need end-to-end order workflow control with manageable governance.
WellSky DME/HME (Bonafide)
enterpriseCloud-based DME/HME management platform covering billing, inventory, intake, and compliance.
Event-to-claim traceability that ties delivery and documentation milestones to submission readiness checks.
WellSky DME/HME (Bonafide) is a DMEPOS operations system built around ongoing rental and supply workflows and payer-facing documentation. It supports referral intake, physician order management, eligibility and prior authorization workflows, and electronic claims submission with claim scrubbing style checks before submission.
Admin controls cover multi-user governance and operational auditing for field, warehouse, and billing roles. The key differentiator is how operational events such as delivery confirmation and service status feed the downstream claim and compliance record chain.
- +Delivery and order status changes drive claim readiness checks
- +Workflow coverage spans intake, orders, documentation, and claim submission
- +Eligibility and prior authorization steps reduce downstream denial loops
- +Role-separated screens for warehouse, field, and billing staff
- –More setup work is needed to align templates to each payer and product line
- –Customization options can add configuration complexity for unique documentation paths
- –Denial management depth depends on how remittance codes are mapped
- –API usage requires governance to maintain consistent integrations across environments
Best for: Fits when mid-market DMEPOS groups need end-to-end rental and supply workflows with tight documentation-to-claim traceability.
Curasev
API-firstAI-powered cloud DME and HME software for billing, inventory, and compliance management.
Configurable intake-to-fulfillment workflow engine with granular task routing across referral, order, and service stages.
Curasev manages home medical equipment workflows with an end-to-end view of referrals, orders, and service fulfillment from intake through delivery. The software focuses on operational coordination needed for durable equipment programs, including task routing, document handling, and status tracking across multiple stakeholders.
It supports integrations through an API surface for system connectivity and automation, which is central to reducing manual handoffs. Administrative controls center on user permissions, operational auditability, and configurable process steps to align care coordination with payer requirements.
- +Workflow orchestration from referral to fulfillment with consistent status tracking
- +API access supports automation for order movement and external system sync
- +Configurable process steps reduce reliance on spreadsheet-based coordination
- +Role-based access controls support separation across care coordinators and admins
- –Medicare DMEPOS-specific work must be configured for each program workflow
- –Complex billing exceptions often require manual intervention outside core flows
- –Inventory and serial-number workflows are not as deep as dedicated warehouse systems
- –Clearinghouse and claim exception handling depth depends on external connectivity
Best for: Fits when care coordination teams need cross-stakeholder order workflows and automation via API.
Nymbl Systems
vertical specialistCloud-based end-to-end DME and HME practice management platform.
Workflow orchestration that advances order status based on document and task completion events across teams.
Nymbl Systems targets HME and DME teams that need end-to-end management from referral to billing workflow execution, not just task tracking. The core capability centers on operational workflows for intake, authorization-related document collection, and claim readiness steps tied to the order record.
The system also supports administration features for team roles and audit-friendly activity history tied to patient and order changes. Automation focuses on routing and status-driven progression across orders and documentation rather than on one-off exports.
- +Status-driven workflow that keeps orders and documentation aligned
- +Role-based access supports controlled edits across intake and billing steps
- +Order record ties documents and billing readiness into one working context
- +Automation reduces manual handoffs between intake, authorizations, and claims work
- –Deep workflow configuration requires governance discipline to avoid process drift
- –Advanced payer-specific rules may require careful setup for each workflow variation
- –Integrations depend on connected systems for patient and EHR data inputs
- –High-volume teams can hit process bottlenecks if routing logic is not standardized
Best for: Fits when HME DME operations need workflow automation across intake, authorizations, and billing readiness with controlled role access.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 healthcare medicine, TIMS Software stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right hme dme software
This buyer's guide frames HME DME software around operational workflow from intake through documentation and claim readiness across TIMS Software, Procura, TeamDME, ComputCare, Brightree, NikoHealth, DMEWorks, WellSky DME/HME, Curasev, and Nymbl Systems.
The ten tools are compared on how orders stay linked to payer-ready artifacts, how workflow steps route tasks to the right users, and how automation and API surfaces support consistent status tracking across staff and systems.
HME DME billing workflow software that ties orders to documentation and claim readiness
HME DME software manages durable medical equipment workflows that convert referral and physician order intent into payer-ready documentation tied to each patient case, then carries orders through claim submission readiness.
Systems like TIMS Software and Procura keep order-to-document or order-to-claim workflows connected by structuring physician order and documentation steps and attaching eligibility and authorization actions directly into the pre-claim path. Other platforms such as Curasev add API-driven orchestration for cross-stakeholder order movement, while options like NikoHealth focus on automated documentation artifacts generated from order lifecycle stages.
For HME and DME teams, the differentiator is not just tracking orders, it is the way configured workflow routing, documentation artifacts, and status transitions stay traceable from intake to claim packet work without losing audit-ready evidence.
Workflow-to-claim controls that keep HME/DME orders traceable
HME DME billing software has to carry orders from intake and physician intent to payer-ready documentation and claim submission readiness without breaking traceability. TIMS Software, Procura, and TeamDME focus on keeping order steps tied to documentation artifacts and claim packet completeness so staff do not reconstruct evidence after statuses change.
The strongest tools also make exceptions visible at the point of order readiness instead of later during denial management work. DMEWorks and Nymbl Systems use workflow-driven status transitions and task routing across teams so blockers are flagged before downstream billing tasks begin.
Order-to-document linkage with payer-ready outputs
TIMS Software links physician order intent to medical necessity and delivery evidence so outputs stay attached to each order. Procura structures order-to-claim workflows so authorization and eligibility steps stay connected to the documentation packet.
Structured physician order handling tied to documentation completeness
Procura keeps structured physician order and documentation handling connected to each order’s claim packet completeness. TeamDME connects intake documents to downstream claims tasks through governed workflow routing by role.
Routing and accountability across intake, documentation, and billing users
TeamDME uses role-based task routing so documentation ownership and billing readiness steps are separated across users. ComputCare uses staff task queues so handoffs remain visible as orders move through fulfillment sequences.
Workflow-centric order status sequences with explicit task queues
ComputCare keeps every order in an explicit fulfillment sequence with linked documents and staff queues. DMEWorks ties workflow order status and documentation workflow into a single operational path so handoffs do not drift into email threads.
API-enabled orchestration for cross-stakeholder order movement
Curasev provides API access for automation that moves orders across referral, order, and service stages. Curasev also requires Medicare DMEPOS-specific program workflow configuration because each workflow must be set up.
Event-driven status advancement based on document and task completion
Nymbl Systems advances order status based on document and task completion events across teams while controlling edits with role-based access. NikoHealth generates payer-ready documentation artifacts tied to each order lifecycle stage through order-to-document automation.
Choose by workflow philosophy: end-to-end traceability vs queue-first control vs API orchestration
The decision hinges on whether the platform keeps evidence attached to the order throughout the workflow or depends on staff to maintain packet completeness. TIMS Software and Procura keep the order-to-document or order-to-claim path connected so documentation ties remain intact as statuses shift.
Teams also need to decide how much of the workflow is configured as explicit steps and queues versus generated from templates and lifecycle stages. ComputCare and DMEWorks emphasize workflow-centric order sequences and task queues, while Curasev shifts complexity toward API-driven orchestration and per-program workflow configuration.
Map clinical intent to documentation and lock the link through pre-claim work
Select TIMS Software if the operational requirement is order-to-document workflow coordination that keeps physician order intent aligned with medical necessity and delivery evidence. Select Procura if the requirement is structured physician order and documentation handling that keeps authorization and eligibility steps connected to claim packet completeness.
Decide whether queue visibility or automation depth should drive daily execution
Select ComputCare when daily execution needs staff task queues and an explicit fulfillment sequence where linked documents move with each order status. Select NikoHealth when the operational requirement prioritizes automated generation of payer-ready documentation artifacts tied to order lifecycle stages.
Test intake-to-claims routing complexity against current forms and staffing model
Select TeamDME when governed multi-user workflows must route tasks by role from intake through claims documentation artifacts. Select Brightree when case-based workflow must connect referrals, orders, and billing tasks and recurring supply ordering must support managed inventory and repeat fulfillment.
Evaluate exception handling needs at the point of order readiness
Select DMEWorks if the priority is exception handling that flags blockers before downstream billing work starts. Select Nymbl Systems if status-driven workflow needs to advance order progress based on document and task completion events with controlled role access.
Confirm whether API automation is a core requirement or a secondary option
Select Curasev when cross-stakeholder automation via API is required to move orders across referral, order, and service stages. Avoid choosing API-first tools as a default when the team cannot commit to Medicare DMEPOS-specific program workflow configuration for each workflow.
Stress-test governance load for multi-product or multi-program expansion
Select TIMS Software when the team must handle workflow and item mapping for new product lines with time allocated for setup discipline. Select Nymbl Systems when governance discipline must be planned to avoid process drift in deep workflow configuration and payer-specific rules.
Who should shortlist these HME/DME platforms
HME DME billing teams that manage multiple staff roles need software that keeps order documentation and claim readiness artifacts attached through every workflow handoff. Procura, TeamDME, and Nymbl Systems support role-based task routing and structured workflow steps that reduce status chasing across teams.
Organizations with automation requirements across systems or complex program workflows need API surface and orchestration patterns that match operational reality. Curasev targets API-driven orchestration, while Brightree emphasizes case-based workflow with recurring supply ordering for ongoing fulfillment cycles.
Multi-staff HME operations with order capture through denial-ready claim artifacts
TIMS Software supports automation from order capture to denial-ready claim artifacts with payer eligibility checks in the pre-claim workflow and end-to-end documentation workflow links.
DME teams that require controlled order-to-claim workflows with audit-ready documentation ties
Procura keeps order to claim workflows connected through structured documentation handling and connects authorization and eligibility steps to reduce manual status chasing.
Mid-size DMEPOS groups that need intake-to-claims traceability with governed multi-user workflows
TeamDME provides configurable record routing that links intake documents to downstream claims tasks with role-based task routing that separates intake, documentation, and billing work.
Cross-stakeholder care coordination teams that must automate order movement and sync
Curasev supports API access for automation and order movement across referral, order, and service stages, while Medicare DMEPOS-specific work requires per-program workflow configuration.
Operators that prioritize event-driven workflow progression tied to document and task completion
Nymbl Systems advances order status based on document and task completion events across teams and uses role-based access to control edits across intake, authorizations, and billing readiness.
Common failure modes when implementing HME/DME billing workflow software
Many implementations fail when workflow configuration does not mirror actual intake variation, documentation timing, and payer-specific requirements. Even workflow-first systems depend on mapping steps and statuses so evidence creation aligns with the way claims packets must be assembled.
Another recurring problem is underestimating integration scope and connector constraints when external EHR or clearinghouse workflows are required for full order-to-claim execution. TIMS Software and ComputCare both flag that external EHR and clearinghouse integration depth can affect project scope and completion timelines.
Treating workflow mapping as a one-time setup rather than an ongoing governance task
TIMS Software requires time for initial workflow and item mapping setup for new product lines, so implementation planning must include workload for mapping updates.
Assuming documentation and claim packet completeness will stay attached without disciplined workflow configuration
Procura and TeamDME both depend on structured order-to-claim or intake-to-claims routing, so teams should validate that document and workflow mapping covers real edge cases before go-live.
Selecting a queue-centric system without confirming the configuration effort needed for workflow steps and statuses
ComputCare calls out that automation coverage depends on configuration of workflow steps and statuses, so teams should allocate time to define those steps.
Overestimating integration depth for EHR and clearinghouse workflows during planning
TIMS Software and ComputCare note that external EHR and clearinghouse integrations can add scope, so integration feasibility should be evaluated against connector availability early.
Choosing automation-heavy orchestration without planning for manual handling of complex billing exceptions
Curasev still requires manual intervention outside core flows for complex billing exceptions, so teams should document which exceptions will remain outside automated orchestration.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each HME DME workflow platform on features that connect orders to documentation and claim packet readiness, and on automation paths that keep statuses and evidence aligned as work moves between staff. Features counted for 40% of the score, while ease and value each contributed 30% to the total.
TIMS Software separated from the field through order-to-document workflow coordination that keeps physician order intent aligned with medical necessity and delivery evidence, and through payer eligibility checks that sit directly in the pre-claim workflow. TeamDME, Procura, and ComputCare scored strongly when their task routing and order-to-claim continuity reduced handoffs, while Curasev and Nymbl Systems ranked higher when API or event-driven workflow progression matched automation requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions About hme dme software
How does TIMS Software coordinate physician order intent with medical necessity documentation and delivery evidence?
Which tools connect orders to downstream claim submission artifacts without manual packet assembly?
What breaks if an HME/DME workflow system lacks structured physician order and documentation handling per order record?
When should organizations choose Curasev over a case-based DMEPOS workflow built around patient case packets?
How do NikoHealth and Curasev differ in where automation runs in the order lifecycle?
Which platform offers admin controls that support governed multi-role workflows for multi-user teams?
How do integrations and API access affect eligibility verification and claim workflow automation?
What operational data model is required to handle event-to-claim traceability for delivery and service status changes?
When do recurring workflows like supply replenishment and status follow-ups become a deciding factor?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Healthcare Medicine alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of healthcare medicine tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare healthcare medicine tools→