GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Ehs Tracking Software of 2026
Top 10 ehs tracking software roundup for safety and compliance teams, ranking tools like Dakota Software, Cority, and Sphera by key criteria.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Dakota Software is the best fit if multi-site EHS teams need standardized field capture with auditable corrective action workflows, while Cority is a stronger enterprise pick when you want workflow enforcement and traceable action closure without Excel resets.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Dakota Software
Linking regulatory obligations and audit findings to the underlying operational records for traceable evidence.
Built for fits when multi-site EHS teams need standardized field capture and auditable corrective action workflows..
Cority
Editor pickConfigurable action workflow engine links findings to assignment, due dates, evidence, and closure states with traceability.
Built for fits when multi-site EHS teams need workflow enforcement and traceable action closure without Excel resets..
Sphera
Editor pickCross-workflow traceability that links hazard assessment outputs to CAPA execution and closure tracking for audit continuity.
Built for fits when multi-site EHS teams need workflow traceability and controlled evidence across safety and environmental obligations..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Dakota Software
vertical specialistDakota Software provides EHS compliance management and regulatory tracking software.
Linking regulatory obligations and audit findings to the underlying operational records for traceable evidence.
Dakota Software records operational EHS data in a consistent set of entities that connect events to follow-up actions and closure. Inspection and observation processes can be standardized with form templates and recurring items for field capture. Regulatory register and audit management features connect compliance requirements to evidence and findings so audits can be traced to operational records. The administration model supports role-based access settings and controlled configuration so teams can separate authoring from review.
A key tradeoff is that deeper automation depends on configuring workflow rules and field templates for each department process. Dakota Software fits best when a company needs one system to standardize field capture, route action items, and retain audit evidence across locations. It is less efficient for teams that only need lightweight incident logging with minimal workflow change.
- +Configurable workflow routing ties incidents, findings, and action closure together
- +Regulatory register and audit management connect obligations to evidence
- +Template-driven inspections and observations standardize field data capture
- +Role-based access supports separation between authors and reviewers
- –Workflow and form configuration can require disciplined internal governance
- –Advanced automation can take more setup than incident-only tools
- –Some integration paths rely on exports and custom mappings
- –Large multi-site deployments may need careful template version control
EHS compliance managers
Maintain a regulatory register with evidence links
Faster audit evidence assembly
Safety operations teams
Route corrective actions from incidents
Reduced action aging
Show 2 more scenarios
Plant supervisors
Standardize inspections and observations
Consistent inspection documentation
Use templates for recurring field inspections and generate action items from each result.
Training coordinators
Track training records tied to tasks
Improved training compliance visibility
Maintain training records and drive completion reviews through workflow status and assignment.
Best for: Fits when multi-site EHS teams need standardized field capture and auditable corrective action workflows.
More related reading
Cority
enterpriseCority provides EHS, quality, industrial hygiene, and sustainability management software.
Configurable action workflow engine links findings to assignment, due dates, evidence, and closure states with traceability.
EHS teams get end-to-end tracking from frontline reporting through assignment, due dates, and closure, with configurable templates for consistent capture. Cority’s automation surface supports conditional routing and reminders so action items move without spreadsheet follow-ups. Audit management works as a separate track that links findings to corrective work and evidence so reviews are traceable. This fit is strongest for organizations that standardize reporting formats and want workflow enforcement across sites.
A tradeoff appears in the need for upfront configuration to map forms, workflows, and approval paths to each business unit’s practices. Cority fits teams handling multi-site compliance where inconsistent data capture would otherwise break reporting and action closure. It can be less efficient when reporting requirements are ad hoc and change weekly without a defined template strategy.
- +Configurable workflows enforce assignment, due dates, and closure steps
- +Audit trails keep record edits traceable across action lifecycle
- +RBAC and approval paths support controlled access to records
- +API and imports help connect EHS events to operational systems
- –Initial setup requires workflow mapping for each business unit
- –Mobile capture can require template discipline for consistent fields
- –Some advanced automation depends on careful configuration choices
- –Cross-system data alignment can take time for complex data sources
EHS compliance managers
Manage audit findings into corrective actions
Faster closure of audit actions
Safety operations teams
Standardize investigation workflow and outcomes
More consistent investigation records
Show 2 more scenarios
Plant managers
Run inspection programs with accountable tasks
Higher inspection-to-action follow-through
Create inspections that generate corrective work and track completion against due dates.
GRC and EHS administrators
Control record access and approvals
Reduced unauthorized record changes
Use RBAC and approval paths to restrict edits and govern publishing of EHS records.
Best for: Fits when multi-site EHS teams need workflow enforcement and traceable action closure without Excel resets.
Sphera
enterpriseSphera provides software for operational risk, process safety, product stewardship, and EHS management.
Cross-workflow traceability that links hazard assessment outputs to CAPA execution and closure tracking for audit continuity.
Sphera’s core strength is traceability across safety and environmental tasks, from hazard assessment outputs to follow-up actions and compliance status. The product supports audit-style review cycles with configurable work processes for inspection findings and CAPA handling. Integration capability is a major fit signal, because organizations typically need data exchange with enterprise systems and data imports for chemicals and obligations.
A tradeoff is that strong governance is required to keep workflows, forms, and obligation mappings consistent across sites. Sphera fits situations where EHS teams need cross-site consistency for incident handling and environmental compliance tracking with defined ownership and audit-ready evidence.
- +End-to-end traceability from assessments to actions and closure
- +Configurable workflows for inspections, findings, and CAPA routing
- +Centralization of chemical and environmental compliance records
- +Integration-focused design for enterprise data exchange
- –Workflow configuration requires disciplined governance across sites
- –Some day-to-day screens can feel form-heavy without tailored templates
- –Mobile capture depends on configured field sets per workflow
- –Advanced reporting can require admin time to standardize views
EHS compliance owners
Manage obligations and evidence
Faster compliance evidence assembly
Safety program managers
Run incident and observation workflows
Lower time to corrective action
Show 2 more scenarios
Environmental compliance teams
Maintain chemical and environmental records
Fewer record mismatches
Centralize environmental data used in daily compliance checks and change tracking.
Operations audit coordinators
Standardize inspection finding closure
More consistent audit outcomes
Convert inspection findings into routed actions with consistent status updates and audit history.
Best for: Fits when multi-site EHS teams need workflow traceability and controlled evidence across safety and environmental obligations.
EcoOnline
enterpriseEcoOnline provides EHS software for chemical management, incidents, risk assessments, and training.
End-to-end case handling from safety observation through corrective action assignment with traceable status changes.
EcoOnline is an EHS tracking system focused on keeping safety, compliance, and risk workflows connected across organizations and assets. The product supports incident and safety observation workflows, corrective actions, and structured hazard assessment and compliance tracking work.
EcoOnline also provides document and chemical-related capabilities that help teams control SDS and substance information tied to workplace risk. Admin tooling for controlled access and oversight is built around auditability, with configuration options for recurring processes like inspections, reporting, and action management.
- +Connected incident, observations, and corrective actions keep accountability in one workflow
- +Hazard assessment workflows align risk scoring to actionable follow-through
- +Chemical and document control features reduce gaps between substance data and field activity
- +Administration and audit trails support governance of EHS processes
- –Configuration depth can slow rollout for teams with many locations
- –Some workflows require tighter process design than teams expect
- –Integration setup can take effort when existing systems use custom data structures
- –Mobile data capture depends on process configuration and field-form design
Best for: Fits when safety teams need linked incident, observation, and action workflows with governed access.
Evotix
enterpriseEvotix provides EHS and sustainability software for incidents, audits, risks, and corrective actions.
Case-centric action workflow that links investigations to corrective and preventive action ownership and closure history.
Evotix captures and routes EHS workflows for incident reporting, observations, and follow-up actions tied to investigation outcomes. It focuses on configurable forms, structured action tracking, and assignment workflows that keep corrective and preventive actions from stalling across departments.
The product supports audit trails for case history and document attachments that attach evidence to specific compliance records. Automation is built around workflow transitions and task assignment so common EHS loops can run with minimal manual chasing.
- +Configurable forms for incidents, observations, and investigations
- +Action tracking ties owners and due dates to investigation outcomes
- +Document attachments maintain evidence per compliance case
- +Workflow transitions reduce manual status updates
- –RBAC depth and fine-grained governance controls feel limited
- –Automation depends on correctly configured workflow transitions
- –Complex integrations require careful mapping of fields and IDs
- –Mobile offline capture is not a first-class workflow in typical deployments
Best for: Fits when EHS teams need configurable case workflows with tracked assignments and evidence attachments for follow-up.
EHS Insight
SMBEHS Insight provides software for incidents, inspections, audits, training, and corrective actions.
Unified follow-up from incident or inspection intake into CAPA-style action assignments with closure tracking.
EHS Insight is an EHS tracking system built for managing compliance records across safety, environment, and contractor workflows. It supports incident reporting, corrective and preventive actions, and inspection or safety observation capture that can be turned into assigned action items.
The solution focuses on structured follow-up so teams can track status, owners, and closure evidence across the audit trail. EHS Insight also supports documentation flows for common compliance artifacts like training records and regulatory obligation tracking.
- +Action-item escalation links incidents, observations, and CAPA workflow steps.
- +Regulatory obligation register supports traceability from requirement to record.
- +Structured inspection and observation intake reduces missing fields.
- +Contractor-facing workflows support separate accountability and tracking.
- –Configuration depth is high for custom workflows and required fields.
- –Reporting coverage can feel limited versus incident and CAPA workflows.
- –API and automation documentation lacks enough detail for complex integrations.
- –Offline capture support is not consistently described for mobile use cases.
Best for: Fits when EHS teams need coordinated incident-to-action tracking with audit-ready history across safety and environmental obligations.
KPA Flex
SMBKPA Flex provides EHS software for risk management, training, inspections, incidents, and compliance.
Workflow-driven CAPA with template-based intake that keeps investigations and follow-ups connected end to end.
KPA Flex from kpa.io focuses on configurable EHS workflows with structured action tracking tied to inspections and observations. It supports incident and investigation capture, then routes results into corrective and preventive actions with status visibility for stakeholders.
The system organizes compliance artifacts into reusable templates and forms, which helps standardize reporting across sites. Admin controls include user permissions, configurable processes, and auditability for key record changes.
- +Configurable EHS workflows that map directly to action lifecycles
- +Structured CAPA tracking with review, assignment, and status progression
- +Reusable form templates for consistent reporting across locations
- +Permission controls support role separation across site and corporate users
- –More setup time than tools with fully prebuilt compliance modules
- –Reporting depth depends on how templates are modeled during configuration
- –Mobile capture requires careful field design to avoid incomplete submissions
- –Complex integrations need a custom approach instead of turnkey connectors
Best for: Fits when EHS teams need configurable workflows and action tracking across multiple sites without manual spreadsheets.
Intelex
enterpriseIntelex provides EHSQ software for incidents, audits, compliance, training, and corrective actions.
Configurable CAPA lifecycle with action-item assignment, approval gates, and closure verification across related records.
Intelex is an EHS tracking system built around enterprise workflows for safety, environment, and audit operations. It manages structured records for incidents, corrective and preventive actions, inspections, and compliance obligations, then routes action items through configurable approval and escalation steps.
The system supports collaboration through role-based access, centralized forms, and configurable status tracking across work queues. Intelex also provides an integration and extensibility surface through APIs and connector options for syncing data with HR, ERP, and other enterprise systems.
- +Workflow-driven CAPA with configurable routing, approvals, and status tracking
- +Centralized EHS record handling across incidents, inspections, and audits
- +Role-based access controls and audit trail for governance across teams
- +Integration options for syncing EHS events with enterprise systems
- –Advanced configuration takes time and process discipline to maintain
- –Some offline mobile capture workflows depend on device and setup choices
- –Report and dashboard design can feel complex for small EHS teams
- –Deep customization may require vendor or systems integration support
Best for: Fits when enterprises need end-to-end EHS records with workflow routing and governed collaboration across sites.
SafetyCulture
SMBSafetyCulture provides mobile-first inspections, incident reporting, actions, training, and safety workflows.
SafetyCulture supports offline-capable mobile inspection capture that syncs to configurable checklist and action workflows with full audit history.
SafetyCulture is built around field data capture for incidents, near-misses, and safety observations using mobile workflows.
It turns EHS inspections into structured checklists with action items, assignments, and completion tracking.
Its extensibility relies on automation and an API surface for pushing results into other systems.
Governance is supported through team roles, audit trails, and configurable templates across locations.
- +Mobile-first inspection and observation capture with offline capability
- +Action items with assignments and due dates for follow-through tracking
- +Template-driven workflows for consistent compliance execution across sites
- +API and automation surface for connecting EHS data to other systems
- –Deep compliance analytics depends on how checklists and fields are modeled
- –Global multi-location governance can require disciplined template ownership
- –Reporting breadth varies by data captured in each template
- –Some advanced integrations depend on external systems to normalize data
Best for: Fits when distributed teams need mobile inspections and action tracking with API-backed integration for compliance reporting.
myosh
SMBmyosh provides cloud software for safety, quality, environmental, and risk management.
Workflow rules that move CAPA records through review, assignment, and closure states with full history.
myosh is an EHS tracking software for teams that need structured incident and action workflows tied to workplace locations. Core capabilities center on reporting inputs, configurable workflows for corrective and preventive actions, and tracking of open items through completion.
The product is built around audit-oriented records, including attachments and timestamps, so activities stay traceable during reviews. Automation is driven through workflow rules and status transitions rather than manual chasing of owners.
- +Configurable corrective and preventive actions workflow with status-based tracking
- +Strong audit trail with attachments and time-stamped record histories
- +Location-aware record organization for incident follow-ups
- +Workflow-driven escalation reduces manual owner tracking
- –Requires setup discipline to keep workflows aligned with site practices
- –Integration and API coverage is less transparent than incident-first competitors
- –Mobile data capture depth is limited for offline-heavy field work
- –Advanced reporting and analytics depth can lag behind inspection-centric tools
Best for: Fits when EHS teams need structured CAPA workflows with traceable records tied to locations.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 environment energy, Dakota Software stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right ehs tracking software
This buyer's guide covers how to select ehs tracking software for incidents, inspections, observations, corrective and preventive actions, and audit-ready recordkeeping.
It compares Dakota Software, Cority, Sphera, EcoOnline, Evotix, EHS Insight, KPA Flex, Intelex, SafetyCulture, and myosh using selection criteria that reflect how these platforms handle workflows, governance, and integration.
The guide explains what to prioritize for multi-site standardization in Dakota Software and Cority, cross-workflow traceability in Sphera, chemical and document linkage in EcoOnline, and mobile-first capture in SafetyCulture.
EHS tracking software for workflow-managed compliance records and CAPA traceability
EHS tracking software captures incidents, near-miss style observations, inspections, hazard assessments, and corrective and preventive actions, then routes ownership through configurable workflow steps. It stores audit evidence and timestamps so reviews can trace a requirement or finding to the underlying operational record.
Teams use these tools to replace manual tracking with structured intake, assignment, due dates, approval gates, and closure states across multiple functions and locations. Dakota Software shows what this looks like when regulatory registers and audit management connect obligations to evidence captured from field workflows.
Evaluation criteria that map to real EHS workflow outcomes
The right tool has to enforce the lifecycle from intake to closure so corrective work does not stall across departments. It also needs governance controls that keep edits traceable and keep templates consistent when multiple sites enter data.
Integration and automation matter because EHS events rarely live only in the EHS system. Cority and Intelex emphasize API and extensibility for syncing EHS events with enterprise systems.
Obligation-to-evidence traceability across records
Dakota Software links regulatory obligations and audit findings to the operational records behind them, so evidence is traceable through the workflow lifecycle. Sphera provides cross-workflow traceability from hazard assessment outputs to CAPA execution and closure tracking for audit continuity.
Configurable CAPA and action workflow engines with assignment and closure history
Cority uses a configurable action workflow engine that ties findings to assignment, due dates, evidence, and closure states with traceability. Intelex provides a configurable CAPA lifecycle with action-item assignment, approval gates, and closure verification across related records.
Template-driven inspection and observation intake
EcoOnline connects incident, observations, and corrective actions in one workflow while using hazard assessment workflows that align risk scoring to follow-through. SafetyCulture uses template-driven checklist and action workflows that standardize compliance execution across sites, with offline capture for field teams.
Structured audit trails and RBAC for controlled record edits
Cority includes audit trails that keep record edits traceable across action lifecycle, plus role-based access and approval paths for controlled access to records. Dakota Software supports role-based access separation between authors and reviewers, which helps teams keep corrective evidence reviewable.
Document and evidence attachment handling per compliance case
Evotix attaches documents and evidence to specific compliance records for investigation follow-up, so attachments stay tied to the case history. Evotix also uses workflow transitions so status updates follow configured transitions instead of manual chasing.
Integration and automation surface for connecting EHS data to other systems
Intelex offers APIs and connector options for syncing EHS events with HR, ERP, and other enterprise systems. Dakota Software emphasizes API-style connectivity and data exchange exports for custom systems, while SafetyCulture exposes an API and automation surface for system-to-system reporting.
Choose an EHS tracker based on workflow control, governance, and integration depth
Selection should start with workflow philosophy because the best fit differs between workflow-enforced CAPA engines and mobile-first checklist capture. Governance needs also determine whether teams can sustain template and workflow discipline across sites without inconsistent field data.
Integration and automation depth determine whether EHS records can move into HR, ERP, and other enterprise systems without manual exports. Intelex and Cority focus on API and imports, while Dakota Software uses exports and API-style connectivity for custom mapping.
Match the workflow philosophy to the compliance lifecycle
If the required model is obligation-to-evidence traceability, Dakota Software connects regulatory registers and audit findings to operational records and closure outcomes. If the required model is end-to-end traceability from assessments to CAPA execution, Sphera links hazard assessment outputs to CAPA execution and closure tracking.
Decide how much governance discipline the organization can sustain
Cority enforces assignment, due dates, and closure steps through configurable workflows and traceable action lifecycles, but workflow mapping per business unit requires setup work. Dakota Software and EcoOnline similarly depend on template and workflow governance so mobile capture fields remain consistent across locations.
Confirm how the tool handles approvals, escalation, and closure verification
Intelex supports workflow routing plus configurable approval gates and closure verification across related records. Evotix and EHS Insight reduce manual status chasing using workflow transitions and action-item escalation that links incident or inspection intake to CAPA-style assignments.
Plan the inspection and observation capture method for field teams
For mobile-first inspection work with offline-capable capture, SafetyCulture supports offline mobile inspection capture that syncs to configurable checklist and action workflows. For case-centric investigative workflows, Evotix and KPA Flex use configurable forms and workflow-driven CAPA that keeps investigations and follow-ups connected end to end.
Validate integration and API-driven automation for the systems that must consume EHS records
For deeper enterprise syncing across systems like HR and ERP, Intelex provides APIs and connector options for syncing EHS events. For custom connectivity, Dakota Software uses API-style connectivity and data exchange exports, while Cority uses APIs and data imports to connect EHS events to operational systems.
Which teams get the most value from workflow-managed EHS tracking
EHS tracking tools fit teams that run repeatable compliance workflows and need audit-ready evidence that ties intake to corrective action closure. The best match depends on whether the organization is organized around multi-site consistency, investigation-centered CAPA cases, or mobile-first field capture.
The tools below align to the documented best-fit segments, including Dakota Software for multi-site standardization and SafetyCulture for distributed field inspection capture.
Multi-site EHS compliance programs that require standardized field capture
Dakota Software is designed for multi-site EHS teams that need standardized field capture and auditable corrective action workflows. Cority also targets multi-site workflow enforcement with traceable action closure without Excel resets.
Organizations that require assessment-to-CAPA traceability across safety and environmental obligations
Sphera fits multi-site teams that need workflow traceability and controlled evidence across safety and environmental obligations. EcoOnline fits teams that want linked incident, observation, and action workflows with governed access and tighter chemical and document linkage.
Enterprises that need end-to-end governed collaboration and approval gates across EHS records
Intelex fits enterprises that need workflow routing and governed collaboration across sites with approval gates and closure verification. Cority also supports RBAC and approval paths, which helps teams control record edits across lifecycle steps.
Distributed field teams that run inspections and observations with offline capture
SafetyCulture fits distributed teams that need mobile inspections and action tracking with offline capability and API-backed integration for compliance reporting. EcoOnline can also work for teams focused on incident and observation workflows, but its rollout depends on configuration depth for many locations.
EHS teams that manage CAPA cases tied to investigations and evidence attachments
Evotix fits teams that need configurable case workflows with tracked assignments and evidence attachments for follow-up. EHS Insight fits teams that coordinate incident-to-action tracking with unified follow-up into CAPA-style action assignments and closure tracking.
Common failure modes when rolling out EHS tracking workflows
EHS trackers fail most often when workflow configuration is treated as a one-time setup instead of a controlled governance process. Another common break is choosing a tool whose field capture model does not match how sites enter data on mobile devices.
Integration issues also appear when automation expectations exceed the documented API and mapping surface.
Running configurable workflows without sustained template governance
Workflow and form configuration in Dakota Software and Cority requires disciplined internal governance for consistent fields and controlled routing. A mitigation is to standardize templates and control template versioning across multi-site teams instead of allowing per-site drift.
Expecting deep reporting without aligning intake fields to analytics needs
EHS Insight can limit reporting breadth versus incident and CAPA workflows when reporting views rely on how fields are modeled. SafetyCulture also reports best when checklists and fields are modeled for the analytics needed, so under-modeled templates produce weaker reporting.
Overestimating automation when workflow transitions are not fully mapped
Evotix automation depends on correctly configured workflow transitions, so partial configuration leads to manual status updates. KPA Flex also routes CAPA progress based on how templates and workflow steps are configured, so incomplete configuration creates stuck follow-ups.
Assuming mobile offline capture is first-class across every workflow
SafetyCulture includes offline-capable mobile inspection capture, while Evotix notes that mobile offline capture is not a first-class workflow in typical deployments. EHS teams should validate offline behavior for the exact workflow types used in field practice, not just for inspections.
Under-scoping integration requirements for custom data structures
Dakota Software integration paths rely on exports and custom mappings, which can require careful template version control for large multi-site deployments. EcoOnline can also take effort when existing systems use custom data structures, so integration planning must include field and identifier alignment.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Dakota Software, Cority, Sphera, EcoOnline, Evotix, EHS Insight, KPA Flex, Intelex, SafetyCulture, and myosh on documented workflow capabilities, ease of use, and value for managing EHS records from intake to closure. Features carried the most weight in the overall scoring, while ease of use and value each contributed a large share to the final ranking. Each tool was scored by how its configuration supports structured intake, assignment, audit trails, and action closure steps for compliance work.
Dakota Software separated itself by linking regulatory obligations and audit findings to the operational records behind them, which directly lifts both features and ease-of-use alignment for auditable workflows. That traceability mechanism connects field outcomes to obligation evidence and reduces the gap between records created in the EHS system and the evidence demanded during audits.
Frequently Asked Questions About ehs tracking software
Which EHS tracking tools enforce corrective action workflows without Excel resets?
How do these platforms link field findings to audit-ready evidence?
When should teams choose offline-capable mobile capture over desktop-only workflows?
Which tools provide an API and data exchange surface for automation and integrations?
How does SSO and RBAC typically show up across enterprise-grade EHS tracking?
What breaks if data migration has to preserve timestamps, attachments, and audit history?
Where does extensibility matter most: adding workflow steps or mapping a custom data model?
How do teams prevent CAPA records from stalling across departments?
When should EHS tracking be built around contractor safety management versus internal worker workflows?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→