
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Chat Server Software of 2026
Top 10 chat server software ranking for teams. Editorial comparison covers Rocket.Chat, Mattermost, Zulip, with key tradeoffs for admins.
How we ranked these tools
An editor sets the topic, the inclusion criteria, and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Rocket.Chat is the strongest pick for teams that need an open-source, self-hosted chat hub with API-driven admin workflows and extensible moderation bots, whereas Zulip fits better if you want threaded topic clarity and automation around message events without the heavier enterprise governance.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Rocket.Chat
Server-side app framework that can subscribe to chat events and implement custom moderation workflows.
Best for: Fits when teams need API-driven admin workflows plus extensible moderation bots.
Mattermost
Editor pickPlugin framework plus event-driven integrations that connect chat participation to external systems.
Best for: Fits when organizations need self-hosted chat with admin governance and workflow automation.
Zulip
Editor pickTopic-based threading within streams, so each subject keeps its own conversation state.
Best for: Fits when teams need topic-thread clarity and automation around message events.
Comparison Table
Rocket.Chat
enterpriseOpen-source self-hosted team communication platform with channels, direct messaging, and video calls.
Server-side app framework that can subscribe to chat events and implement custom moderation workflows.
Rocket.Chat supports group chat with fine-grained room moderation tools, occupant roles, and affiliation-like group membership management for structured access inside the server. Chat persistence uses built-in message archiving and last-message storage so rooms can show recent context after reconnects. The automation surface includes REST APIs for users, rooms, and administration tasks, plus real-time features through its WebSocket gateway for live updates.
A key tradeoff is that deep governance and retention outcomes require careful configuration of policies and retention windows across servers and apps. Rocket.Chat fits teams that want a chat server with extensibility and an API-driven admin workflow, such as organizations standardizing onboarding and moderation across many rooms.
- +REST APIs cover user, room, and administration automation
- +App framework enables event-driven bots and custom commands
- +Message retention controls reduce audit and compliance gaps
- +Real-time updates via WebSocket gateway for low-latency UX
- –Retention and policy tuning requires admin discipline
- –Federation setup adds operational complexity for multi-server deployments
- –Advanced moderation often needs custom automation apps
- –Performance tuning may be needed for very large room counts
IT operations teams
Automate user and room provisioning
Fewer manual admin steps
Security and compliance teams
Enforce consistent message retention
Predictable retention outcomes
Show 2 more scenarios
Community moderators
Automate room moderation actions
Faster intervention cycles
Custom apps can react to events and apply moderation rules or alerts.
Distributed engineering teams
Bridge communications across servers
Reduced fragmentation
Federation support helps link separate deployments while keeping local room controls.
Best for: Fits when teams need API-driven admin workflows plus extensible moderation bots.
Mattermost
enterpriseSelf-hosted messaging platform designed for developer workflows and enterprise compliance.
Plugin framework plus event-driven integrations that connect chat participation to external systems.
Mattermost is designed for organizations that want chat persistence, moderated channels, and admin controls that map to real governance needs. Room roles and permissions support structured collaboration across teams, and audit-grade visibility is available through server logs and admin tooling. The integration story is driven by a documented REST API, plus hooks and event-driven automation for external systems that need message, user, or workflow context.
A key tradeoff is that Mattermost’s differentiation is centered on server-side collaboration features rather than protocol-level federation. Mattermost fits well when chat is the front end for operational workflows like incident updates, approvals, and engineering notifications, and when teams need admin discipline over retention, permissions, and access.
- +Admin controls support room governance and org-wide user management
- +REST API enables message and user automation for external workflow systems
- +Plugin framework supports server-side extensions for custom workflows
- +Retention and audit-oriented server logging fit compliance review processes
- –Not built as a federation-first messaging server for external protocol ecosystems
- –Operational setup requires planning for backups, scaling, and index tuning
IT operations teams
Incident channels with automated updates
Faster triage and consistent updates
Enterprise compliance teams
Moderated collaboration with visibility controls
More controlled internal communication
Show 2 more scenarios
Platform engineering teams
Chat-driven release coordination
Lower coordination overhead
Webhooks and the REST API sync builds, deployments, and approvals across toolchains.
Customer support teams
Case handoff through structured rooms
Cleaner handoffs and routing
Support orgs use role-based rooms and automations to route conversations to the right group.
Best for: Fits when organizations need self-hosted chat with admin governance and workflow automation.
Zulip
SMBThreaded open-source chat server organizing conversations by topics within streams.
Topic-based threading within streams, so each subject keeps its own conversation state.
Zulip organizes communication as streams with per-topic threads inside each stream, which keeps cross-team coordination from turning into a linear feed. Core capabilities include real-time delivery, presence signals, message editing, and full-text search over stored messages with retention controls governed by the server configuration. Administration includes user provisioning hooks, org-wide settings, and permission controls for posting and managing streams and topics.
A key tradeoff is that strict topic discipline matters, because each topic becomes a distinct thread and misused topics fragment discussions. Zulip fits well for teams that need long-running coordination with repeatable discussion themes, like incident follow-ups, release notes, and recurring engineering reviews.
- +Topic-thread message model keeps context attached to ongoing work
- +Bots and integrations can react to message and topic activity
- +Strong message search and history retention for audits and reviews
- +Granular controls for stream membership and stream/topic moderation
- –Topic structure can fragment discussions when norms are weak
- –Some federation and external chat interoperability needs careful planning
- –Moderation and governance require consistent operator attention
- –Large installs need tuning to keep search and delivery responsive
Engineering teams
Track features with reusable discussion topics
Faster retrieval of decisions
Operations and support
Coordinate incidents with structured follow-ups
Lower time to compile timelines
Show 1 more scenario
Community and education
Run cohorts and Q&A in channels
Less duplicate Q&A
Moderators manage posting rules per stream while topic threads keep recurring questions searchable.
Best for: Fits when teams need topic-thread clarity and automation around message events.
Element
enterpriseMatrix-based secure messaging client and homeserver hosting for decentralized communication.
Device verification and encryption key trust management are integrated into Element for secure cross-device messaging.
Element is best evaluated as a Matrix client used with a Matrix homeserver, because rooms, history, and federation behavior are determined by server components and Matrix event processing. The client exposes common collaboration affordances like read markers, typing signals, and threaded discussions through Matrix’s event model rather than separate proprietary channels.
Automation and integration typically center on Matrix room events, state changes, and account or device lifecycle actions, which map cleanly to external services built with Matrix application services. That makes Element a strong endpoint for workflows that need audit-friendly event streams and deterministic room state transitions.
Administrative controls like federation policy, account provisioning rules, and retention are implemented on the homeserver side, so the client configuration is mostly about encryption setup, key backup behavior, and usability settings. For moderation at scale, bots and server-side policy plugins are usually required to enforce repeatable room governance.
- +Matrix-native rooms support threads, reactions, and message history without client workarounds
- +Device keys and verification flows are built into the client for end-to-end encryption users
- +Event-based APIs fit room automation and integration with external systems
- +Federated rooms enable cross-organization collaboration without custom gateways
- –Admin governance settings often require homeserver tuning beyond the client interface
- –Granular moderation workflows depend on server policies and bots rather than core UI controls
Best for: Fits when teams need federated, standards-based group chat with end-to-end encryption and room automation via Matrix events.
Synapse
API-firstReference Matrix homeserver implementation written in Python for federated chat.
Federation-aware room state and persistence lets a homeserver participate in cross-server rooms without external message relays.
Synapse runs as a Matrix homeserver that accepts client connections, routes messages to local rooms, and forwards federated traffic to other Matrix servers. It provides server-side persistence with message history support and room membership state so clients can reload timelines and presence consistently.
Administration is centered on configuration files plus an HTTP API, with operational controls for federation, rate limits, and retention. Synapse also exposes automation hooks through Matrix APIs and supports extensions via the Synapse ecosystem and standard federation behaviors.
- +Mature Matrix homeserver implementation with stable room and federation behavior
- +Message history storage supports client sync and timeline reloads
- +Operational controls include federation toggles and admin HTTP endpoints
- +Strong extensibility path through Matrix-compatible clients and federation peers
- –Deep configuration requires careful ops discipline for production deployments
- –Advanced admin automation relies on internal APIs and platform knowledge
- –Performance tuning depends on workload patterns and data retention settings
- –Moderation workflows often require external bots and policy wiring
Best for: Fits when teams need a standards-based Matrix homeserver with federation and long-lived room history.
ejabberd
enterpriseScalable XMPP chat server written in Erlang with proven telecom-grade reliability.
Erlang-based module hooks let teams implement custom stanza handling and event-driven logic inside ejabberd.
ejabberd is an XMPP chat server known for long-term deployments in federated messaging and high-availability setups. It runs core XMPP features like MUC group chats, presence relaying, and stream management with offline message handling for interrupted sessions.
Administration is done through configuration files and an HTTP and Erlang runtime surface, which supports scripted automation around service startup, health checks, and custom integrations. Extensibility is achieved via Erlang code and modules, including hooks that can feed event-driven workflows into moderation, archiving, or custom routing.
- +MUC group chat support with configurable room behavior and access controls
- +Federation-ready XMPP routing with server-to-server dialback and TLS options
- +Stream management support improves delivery continuity on unstable networks
- +Erlang module system enables custom stanza processing and event hooks
- –Configuration via text files adds operational friction versus web-first admin consoles
- –Advanced governance workflows often require custom modules and external tooling
- –Feature depth can increase the need for careful tuning under load
- –Debugging Erlang runtime issues can slow troubleshooting for teams without expertise
Best for: Fits when XMPP federation and custom stanza workflows matter more than a web-first admin UI.
Prosody
SMBLightweight XMPP server built in Lua prioritizing simplicity and low resource usage.
Event-driven module system that lets deployments implement custom stanza handling and room automation without patching the core.
Prosody positions itself as an XMPP server for teams that want a configurable, code-friendly chat backbone rather than a single monolith. It supports core chat-server behavior such as user authentication, multi-user rooms, presence handling, and reliable routing of message stanzas.
Prosody’s strength is the extensibility surface through modules and event-driven hooks, which lets deployments tailor federation, archiving, and moderation workflows. Administrators can manage behavior through granular configuration files that map directly to routing, TLS, and feature enablement for the server.
- +Module-based extensibility for federation, archiving, and custom routing logic
- +Granular configuration for TLS, authentication, and feature enablement
- +Solid multi-user room support with occupant roles and room policies
- +Mature XMPP mechanics for presence and message delivery behavior
- –Operational setup is configuration-heavy compared with chat platforms
- –Automation requires scripting around events and module hooks
Best for: Fits when teams need an XMPP-based chat server with custom modules and control over routing features.
Centrifugo
enterpriseOpen-source real-time messaging server.
Authorization and subscription control can be enforced through server-side APIs and hooks around each client channel.
Centrifugo is a real-time chat server that focuses on a WebSocket gateway and publish-subscribe messaging model. It serves clients with room-oriented broadcasting and supports message persistence through configurable backends rather than a fixed monolith.
Centrifugo exposes an admin API for managing users and subscriptions plus a programmable event pipeline through hooks and server-side handlers. For chat teams, it pairs room delivery controls with fine-grained client subscription flows to reduce custom gateway code.
- +WebSocket gateway with room broadcast primitives for chat delivery
- +API-driven subscriptions fit multi-tenant chat provisioning workflows
- +Pluggable persistence backends for chat history storage control
- +Hook and handler pipeline enables custom moderation and enrichment logic
- –Chat features like typing indicators need explicit client and event wiring
- –Server deployments require careful scaling of pub-sub and persistence components
- –Room ACL enforcement often must be implemented through custom authorization hooks
- –XMPP-style interoperability and stanza semantics are not part of the core feature set
Best for: Fits when teams need WebSocket chat delivery with programmable subscription and persistence controls.
Discord
vertical specialistVoice, video, and text chat community platform.
Voice channels integrated with text threads and channel permissions for one cohesive team conversation flow.
Discord runs real-time group chats with voice channels, screen sharing, and threaded conversations. It centers on community spaces built from servers, channels, roles, and permission overwrites, with moderation features like automations and member timeouts.
Media and conversation access are managed inside a proprietary data model, with search and message history available per server settings. Extensibility comes through a bot framework and webhook-style integrations, which enable workflow automation inside channels.
- +Fast client experience for chat, voice, and screen sharing in one workflow
- +Granular permissions using roles plus channel-specific permission overwrites
- +Built-in automation via bots and server rules for moderation and workflows
- +Threads and channel organization keep long discussions navigable
- –Governance and audit trails are limited compared with enterprise chat platforms
- –Advanced data retention and export require app-level tooling and planning
- –Room control granularity is narrower than XMPP-style stanza-level ACLs
- –Reliance on bots for many workflows increases operational dependency
Best for: Fits when teams need chat plus voice with lightweight automation and role-based access for ongoing communities.
Guilded
vertical specialistCommunity chat server designed for gaming and teams.
Native event and scheduling workflow inside team spaces, managed alongside channels and voice rooms.
Guilded is a chat server tool built around team spaces, real-time chat, and event-style coordination. Its core experience combines text channels, voice rooms, and structured groups so communities can run live discussions and planning in the same place.
Guilded also provides moderation controls for room behavior, plus bots and automation hooks for recurring workflows. Administration is centered on user management, channel permissions, and governance for large team adoption.
- +Voice rooms and chat channels share the same team navigation model
- +Room moderation tooling covers practical day to day governance tasks
- +Bots and automation integrations fit recurring community workflows
- +Permission controls support channel level access patterns for teams
- –Federation style server to server interoperability is not a core design goal
- –Advanced integrations depend on bot and API surface quality rather than built in enterprise controls
- –Message retention and search depth are less transparent than in admin first systems
- –Migration from IRC like or self hosted community layouts can require rework
Best for: Fits when teams want chat and voice plus automation in one workspace.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 chat server software, Rocket.Chat stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Chat Server Software
This buyer's guide covers chat server software built for self-hosted team messaging and governed collaboration, with Rocket.Chat, Mattermost, and Zulip highlighted across different message models and automation surfaces. The guide then compares Element and the Matrix homeserver stack through Synapse, along with XMPP server options from ejabberd and Prosody, and it adds WebSocket delivery from Centrifugo plus workflow-centric community platforms like Discord and Guilded.
Rocket.Chat is included for server-side app extensibility, Mattermost for admin governance and workflow automation, and Zulip for topic-thread conversation state. Other entries are included where protocol federation, module hooks, or WebSocket subscription control changes how chat persistence and integrations are operated.
Chat Server Software for team messaging with federation, automation APIs, and controlled persistence
Chat server software runs the backend that manages rooms or channels, user sessions, message delivery, and message history storage, then exposes controls for moderation, governance, and integrations. Teams choose between products built around extensible event-driven frameworks, standards-based federation, and topic-scoped conversation state. Rocket.Chat emphasizes a server-side app framework that can subscribe to chat events and drive REST API-based admin automation for user and room workflows.
Zulip emphasizes a topic-thread message model within streams so conversation state stays attached to each subject while bots and integrations react to message and topic activity. Matrix-focused deployments often split responsibilities across Element clients and a Matrix homeserver such as Synapse, where federation-aware room state and persistence lets a homeserver participate in cross-server rooms with long-lived history.
Chat server capabilities that determine moderation, automation, and persistence behavior
Chat server software needs a clear automation surface so moderation actions, user lifecycle events, and room governance can be driven by APIs and event hooks instead of manual admin UI work. Message history storage and retention controls then determine what “chat persistence” actually means when users reload timelines, admins enforce policies, and integrations replay events.
Server-side extensibility with a programmable event loop
Rocket.Chat uses a server-side app framework that can subscribe to chat events and implement custom moderation workflows. Prosody uses an event-driven module system where deployments add stanza handling and room automation without patching the core.
Admin governance controls tied to room and org workflows
Mattermost provides admin controls for room governance and org-wide user management with a REST API for workflow automation. Discord includes channel permissions with role-based access, but governance and audit trails are limited versus enterprise chat platforms.
Message model that preserves conversation context per unit of work
Zulip’s topic-thread message model keeps context attached to each subject inside streams, which supports automation around message and topic activity. Rocket.Chat is centered on room-based workflows with app-driven moderation rather than topic-thread conversation state as the primary organizing model.
Federation and standards alignment for cross-server rooms
Synapse is a federation-aware Matrix homeserver where persistent room state supports long-lived cross-server participation. ejabberd is federation-ready for XMPP routing using server-to-server dialback and TLS options with MUC group chat support.
WebSocket delivery control for multi-tenant chat provisioning
Centrifugo provides a WebSocket gateway with room broadcast primitives and API-driven subscriptions to support multi-tenant provisioning workflows. Rocket.Chat focuses on server-side event extensibility for chat operations and moderation bots rather than WebSocket subscription enforcement as the primary architecture.
A decision framework for selecting Chat Server Software by automation depth and message architecture
Start with the automation and governance workflow that admins must run, then map that workflow to the server’s extensibility and API surface. Then choose the message architecture that will keep context stable for users, because topic-scoped threading, room-based histories, and federation-first persistence lead to different operational patterns.
Pick the event and automation surface admins will extend
If moderation needs custom bots that react to chat events and perform server-driven admin automation, Rocket.Chat’s REST APIs and app framework fit this pattern. If custom chat behavior must be added as deploy-time modules around stanza handling, Prosody and ejabberd support configuration-heavy module or hook workflows.
Choose the conversation state model that matches how teams work
If teams need each subject to retain its own conversation state across messages, Zulip’s topic-thread model keeps context attached to each ongoing work item. If teams organize work around rooms and moderation workflows, Mattermost and Rocket.Chat align naturally with room governance and event-driven integrations.
Decide whether federation is core to the server design
If cross-server rooms with long-lived history must be first-order, Synapse is built for federation-aware room state and persistence. If cross-server messaging must follow XMPP routing behavior with MUC group chat and server-to-server dialback, ejabberd and Prosody are designed around that protocol model.
Select the integration approach for real-time delivery and subscriptions
If the chat platform must expose programmable delivery control over WebSocket channels for multi-tenant subscription provisioning, Centrifugo provides API-driven subscriptions and broadcast primitives. If real-time chat operations should be governed inside the messaging server with a moderation extension framework, Rocket.Chat and Mattermost focus on server-side automation for chat participation.
Plan for the operational work behind retention, indexing, and governance
If message retention and policy tuning will be continuously adjusted, Rocket.Chat explicitly requires admin discipline for retention and policy tuning. If scaling relies on index tuning and operational planning, Mattermost calls out backup, scaling, and index tuning as part of deployment setup.
Who each Chat Server Software fits best based on governance and message architecture
Different chat server software choices cluster around specific admin workflows and conversation-state requirements. Teams also differ on whether the server must be federation-first, whether WebSocket delivery must be separately programmable, and whether encryption governance depends on homeserver settings rather than client defaults.
Teams that require custom moderation workflows driven by server-side code
Rocket.Chat supports a server-side app framework that subscribes to chat events and automates moderation actions via REST APIs. This matches teams that want automation breadth inside the messaging server instead of external glue scripts.
Organizations that need self-hosted governance and workflow automation tied to room and user lifecycle
Mattermost provides admin controls for room governance and org-wide user management and exposes a REST API for messaging and user automation. This fits when governance and workflow integration must live in the same system administrators manage daily.
Teams that organize collaboration around subjects where context must stay attached
Zulip’s topic-thread message model keeps conversation state anchored to each topic within streams. This fits when staff need automation and clarity around recurring work items rather than room-only history browsing.
Deployments that must participate in federation-based cross-server rooms using Matrix or XMPP
Synapse provides federation-aware room state and persistence for long-lived Matrix rooms, while ejabberd and Prosody provide federation-ready XMPP routing with server-to-server dialback and MUC support. These teams need standards-aligned server behavior rather than federation added as an add-on.
Platforms that need programmable real-time delivery and subscription control over WebSockets
Centrifugo offers a WebSocket gateway with room broadcast primitives and API-driven subscriptions. This fits when chat delivery must integrate with separate multi-tenant provisioning workflows and custom client event wiring.
Common buyer pitfalls when selecting Chat Server Software for persistence, governance, and federation
Many failures come from selecting a chat server by client experience while underestimating server-side governance, retention, and operational tuning. Other failures happen when federation or extensibility expectations exceed what the chosen architecture natively supports, which increases integration work during deployment.
Choosing a product for federation expectations without checking the server’s federation-first persistence behavior
Synapse is designed for federation-aware room state and persistent timelines in Matrix deployments. Guilded and Discord position federation-style interoperability as non-core, so cross-server interoperability needs careful planning and may rely on third-party bots or export tooling.
Assuming chat extensions and moderation can be implemented with only client-side automation
Rocket.Chat’s server-side app framework is built to subscribe to chat events and implement custom moderation workflows. Prosody and ejabberd also emphasize server-side module or stanza handling, so governance logic should be designed as deploy-time modules or server hooks rather than UI-only actions.
Underestimating how retention and policy tuning affects ongoing operations
Rocket.Chat explicitly flags that retention and policy tuning requires admin discipline. Mattermost similarly calls out operational setup planning for backups, scaling, and index tuning, which affects how message history and governance actions behave at scale.
Confusing topic-scoped conversation needs with room-scoped history browsing
Zulip’s topic-thread model keeps context attached to each subject and can fragment discussions when norms are weak. Room-first platforms like Mattermost and Rocket.Chat rely on room governance and moderation workflows, so topic clarity must be enforced through process and bot rules rather than inherent threading.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Rocket.Chat, Mattermost, Zulip, Element, Synapse, ejabberd, Prosody, Centrifugo, Discord, and Guilded on feature coverage, operational usability, and fit for governed team messaging. Features accounted for 40% of scoring, while ease of administration and day-to-day operational value each accounted for 30%.
Rocket.Chat set the pace by combining REST APIs for user and room administration automation with a server-side app framework that subscribes to chat events for custom moderation workflows. This combination mapped directly to integration depth and automation control depth, which then influenced its overall ranking.
Frequently Asked Questions About Chat Server Software
How do Rocket.Chat and Zulip differ in message organization for large teams?
Which tool provides the strongest admin automation surface for provisioning and moderation workflows?
What breaks if a team needs federation-level interoperability instead of a single-server collaboration model?
How do Element and Synapse handle encryption and device trust in day-to-day operations?
When do ejabberd and Prosody become a better fit than WebSocket-first servers like Centrifugo?
Where does Centrifugo fall short if the requirement is full chat-room persistence and protocol-grade history controls?
How do admin controls and auditability typically differ between Rocket.Chat and Discord?
Which integration path works best for connecting chat participation to external ticketing or DevOps workflows?
What tradeoff appears when selecting Rocket.Chat versus Mattermost for extensibility and governance?
How should a team plan data migration when moving from a legacy chat system to Synapse or ejabberd?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Top 10 Best Folder Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Foil Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Mapping Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Making Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Online Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Drawing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Designer Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flowchart Design Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flow Diagram Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flow Chart Making Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flow Charts Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flow Chart Maker Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flow Chart Mac Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flipping Page Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flipping Pages Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flexibility Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flash Usb Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flash Text Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flash Memory Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Flash Drive Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→