GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Telecommunications ConnectivityTop 9 Best Bandwidth Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Bandwidth Software tools for reliable calling and messaging. Review picks like MessageBird and Vonage, then choose.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
MessageBird
Delivery webhook events for SMS and voice that power real-time status-driven automation
Built for teams building omnichannel messaging and programmable voice without separate integrations.
Vonage
Programmable Voice APIs for call control with webhooks and routing integration
Built for teams building API-driven voice and messaging into existing business apps.
Nexmo (Vonage Communications Platform)
Verify APIs for multi-channel authentication and identity checks
Built for developers building custom SMS and voice features with verification.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps Bandwidth Software’s communication and telecom-integration building blocks against MessageBird, Vonage, and Vonage Communications Platform and related platforms like Nexmo. Readers can compare capabilities such as call and messaging delivery, operational tooling in the Bandwidth Control Center, and enterprise directory integration via Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) to find the closest fit for specific network and workflow requirements.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MessageBird Delivers global messaging and voice capabilities via APIs for building telecom connectivity into applications. | messaging-api | 8.4/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 2 | Vonage Provides communications APIs for voice and messaging that enable application-driven telecom connectivity. | communications-api | 8.0/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 3 | Nexmo (Vonage Communications Platform) Operates a communications API surface for messaging and voice that supports telecom connectivity use cases. | api-platform | 8.0/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 4 | Bandwidth Control Center Provides administrative visibility and configuration interfaces for Bandwidth connectivity services and messaging operations. | ops-dashboard | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 5 | Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) for telecom integrations Supplies an authentication and directory service that telecom systems frequently integrate to manage connectivity access control. | directory-auth | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | 6.5/10 | 7.3/10 |
| 6 | FreeRADIUS Provides a RADIUS server used to authenticate and authorize network access for telecom connectivity workflows. | radius-auth | 7.3/10 | 8.1/10 | 6.2/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 7 | WireGuard Implements modern VPN tunneling for secure connectivity between network endpoints used in telecom backhaul and integration. | vpn-transport | 6.8/10 | 6.6/10 | 7.1/10 | 6.8/10 |
| 8 | OpenAI Provides API access to AI models that can be integrated with telecom applications that orchestrate messaging and voice workflows. | AI for communications | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 9 |  AWS Offers cloud services like Amazon Connect and messaging integrations that support telecommunications connectivity in production architectures. | cloud telecom infrastructure | 8.1/10 | 9.2/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 |
Delivers global messaging and voice capabilities via APIs for building telecom connectivity into applications.
Provides communications APIs for voice and messaging that enable application-driven telecom connectivity.
Operates a communications API surface for messaging and voice that supports telecom connectivity use cases.
Provides administrative visibility and configuration interfaces for Bandwidth connectivity services and messaging operations.
Supplies an authentication and directory service that telecom systems frequently integrate to manage connectivity access control.
Provides a RADIUS server used to authenticate and authorize network access for telecom connectivity workflows.
Implements modern VPN tunneling for secure connectivity between network endpoints used in telecom backhaul and integration.
Provides API access to AI models that can be integrated with telecom applications that orchestrate messaging and voice workflows.
Offers cloud services like Amazon Connect and messaging integrations that support telecommunications connectivity in production architectures.
MessageBird
messaging-apiDelivers global messaging and voice capabilities via APIs for building telecom connectivity into applications.
Delivery webhook events for SMS and voice that power real-time status-driven automation
MessageBird stands out for omnichannel communication APIs that unify SMS, voice, and chat-style messaging into one developer workflow. It provides message routing, delivery notifications, and programmable voice features for customer engagement flows. Bandwidth teams can integrate with contact-center and business messaging journeys without building separate channel stacks.
Pros
- Omnichannel messaging APIs for SMS, voice, and chat-driven experiences
- Delivery status and event webhooks support reliable, observable workflows
- Programmable voice tools fit call routing and interactive voice experiences
- Unified developer experience reduces channel-specific integration duplication
- Robust filtering and templating helps standardize high-volume outbound messaging
Cons
- Advanced routing and compliance controls require deliberate configuration
- Voice-centric use cases can involve more setup than SMS-first deployments
- Multi-region behavior can add complexity to testing and troubleshooting
Best For
Teams building omnichannel messaging and programmable voice without separate integrations
More related reading
Vonage
communications-apiProvides communications APIs for voice and messaging that enable application-driven telecom connectivity.
Programmable Voice APIs for call control with webhooks and routing integration
Vonage stands out for combining programmable communications with cloud APIs that support voice, messaging, and contact-center style workflows. Core capabilities include SIP trunking for voice, SMS and MMS messaging, and voice solutions exposed through programmable interfaces. The platform also supports authentication and device-related communications patterns that fit omnichannel deployments. Integration options center on API-driven routing and event handling for building custom communication flows.
Pros
- Programmable voice and messaging APIs support custom routing logic.
- SIP trunking fits existing PBX and carrier voice architectures.
- Event-driven callbacks help synchronize app state with call activity.
Cons
- Advanced call flows require developer work for reliable orchestration.
- Configuration complexity increases when combining voice, SMS, and routing rules.
- Reporting depth can feel limited versus full contact-center suites.
Best For
Teams building API-driven voice and messaging into existing business apps
Nexmo (Vonage Communications Platform)
api-platformOperates a communications API surface for messaging and voice that supports telecom connectivity use cases.
Verify APIs for multi-channel authentication and identity checks
Nexmo, branded as Vonage Communications Platform, stands out with programmable communications APIs that target SMS, voice, and verification workflows. Core capabilities include programmable voice calling, SMS messaging, number management, and conversational messaging via its messaging endpoints. It also supports authentication flows through verification APIs that integrate with existing applications and account logic. The platform emphasizes direct API control for developers rather than built-in call center agents or drag-and-drop automation.
Pros
- Strong REST APIs for SMS, voice, and verification workflows
- Flexible number and routing controls for multi-region deployments
- Developer-focused tooling that fits custom communication products
Cons
- Complex event and webhook handling requires solid backend expertise
- Limited visibility features compared with full contact-center suites
- Debugging integrations can take time when campaigns span regions
Best For
Developers building custom SMS and voice features with verification
More related reading
Bandwidth Control Center
ops-dashboardProvides administrative visibility and configuration interfaces for Bandwidth connectivity services and messaging operations.
Service health and usage dashboards that unify operational monitoring for Bandwidth-managed delivery
Bandwidth Control Center stands out for consolidating network and service visibility for Bandwidth accounts into one operational console. Core capabilities focus on monitoring service health, tracking usage, and managing bandwidth-related settings and reporting. The tool also supports troubleshooting workflows with logs and operational dashboards tied to Bandwidth delivery. Administrators get centralized control without stitching together multiple external monitoring systems.
Pros
- Central dashboards connect service status, usage, and operational reporting in one place
- Granular visibility supports faster troubleshooting across bandwidth-related activity
- Account-level control reduces the need for separate internal reporting tools
- Dashboards and logs make it easier to validate changes and detect anomalies
Cons
- Deep configuration can be harder to navigate without prior network context
- Reporting workflows feel more operational than customizable for advanced analytics
- Some troubleshooting requires manual correlation across multiple views
Best For
Teams managing Bandwidth services needing operational visibility and accountable usage tracking
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) for telecom integrations
directory-authSupplies an authentication and directory service that telecom systems frequently integrate to manage connectivity access control.
Overlay framework for adding behaviors without rewriting directory data models
OpenLDAP provides an LDAP directory server built for telecom integrations that require standards-based user, device, or subscriber identity storage and lookup. It supports common LDAP operations like bind, search, modify, and access control using configurable backends and overlays for extending directory behavior. The deployment model fits environments that need externalized authentication sources and consistent query semantics across multiple network systems.
Pros
- Rich backend and overlay system supports diverse telecom directory patterns
- Standard LDAP operations with configurable schemas and access controls
- Reliable replication and operational tooling for multi-node deployments
Cons
- Configuration and troubleshooting require deeper LDAP and schema knowledge
- Authorization behavior depends heavily on correct ACL and schema tuning
Best For
Telecom teams integrating LDAP-based identity lookups into network services
More related reading
FreeRADIUS
radius-authProvides a RADIUS server used to authenticate and authorize network access for telecom connectivity workflows.
Hot-pluggable module architecture with tunable request, reply, and accounting processing
FreeRADIUS stands out as a highly configurable RADIUS server built for AAA authentication, authorization, and accounting. It supports common enterprise integrations like LDAP for identity lookup and SQL for policy and accounting storage. It also handles advanced network access control use cases with attribute-based rules and per-user or per-group policies. Operations depend on careful configuration of modules, policies, and logging to match the target Wi-Fi, VPN, or switch environment.
Pros
- Robust AAA support for authentication, authorization, and accounting in one daemon
- Extensive module ecosystem for LDAP, SQL, and multiple backend integrations
- Policy control via request, reply, and accounting modules for fine-grained access rules
- Mature protocol handling for Wi‑Fi, VPN, and network device RADIUS deployments
Cons
- Configuration complexity requires strong RADIUS and module knowledge
- Troubleshooting often depends on reading detailed logs and tracing module decisions
- Operational risk increases with misordered policy logic and overlapping rule conditions
Best For
Networks needing standards-based AAA for Wi-Fi or VPN access control
WireGuard
vpn-transportImplements modern VPN tunneling for secure connectivity between network endpoints used in telecom backhaul and integration.
AllowedIPs-based routing per peer in WireGuard interface configuration
WireGuard stands out for its minimal VPN design and small, auditable codebase. It provides secure point-to-point and site-to-site tunneling using modern cryptography and fast handshakes. Core capabilities include peer-based configuration, interface management, and routing through allowed IPs for granular traffic control. It is typically deployed at the network layer rather than as a bandwidth monitoring or workflow product.
Pros
- Small codebase enables straightforward security review and auditing
- High-performance VPN tunnels with fast key rekeying
- Peer-based configuration supports flexible site-to-site routing
Cons
- Not a bandwidth analytics or reporting tool for usage monitoring
- Configuration and routing require solid networking knowledge
- No built-in centralized policy management for many sites
Best For
Teams needing lightweight encrypted tunnels between servers and networks
More related reading
OpenAI
AI for communicationsProvides API access to AI models that can be integrated with telecom applications that orchestrate messaging and voice workflows.
Tool calling and structured outputs for converting model text into workflow-ready fields
OpenAI stands out with strong general-purpose generative AI models built for text, code, vision, and speech. Core capabilities include API access to foundation models, Chat Completions style reasoning workflows, and structured outputs via tool and function calling patterns. Developers can build retrieval-augmented experiences and agent-like flows by combining the models with external data sources and orchestration logic.
Pros
- High-quality text generation for support drafts, summaries, and knowledge assistance
- Tool and function calling patterns support structured outputs for workflows
- Vision and code-capable models enable multi-modal automation beyond text
Cons
- Prompting and output reliability require ongoing tuning and validation
- Complex orchestration work falls on integrators building agent behaviors
- Lacks Bandwidth-native workflow builders for turnkey contact-center automation
Best For
Teams integrating AI into Bandwidth workflows with custom engineering and orchestration
AWS
cloud telecom infrastructureOffers cloud services like Amazon Connect and messaging integrations that support telecommunications connectivity in production architectures.
AWS Identity and Access Management with fine-grained roles, policies, and federation
AWS is distinct because it offers a broad portfolio of infrastructure and managed services that support Bandwidth Software workloads end to end. Core capabilities include compute via EC2 and containers via ECS and EKS, managed data services like RDS and DynamoDB, and messaging through SQS and SNS for event-driven systems. Strong security controls include IAM, encryption options across services, and network isolation with VPC. AWS also supports reliable telecom adjacent architectures using integrations such as API Gateway and event routing patterns for call related workflows.
Pros
- Massive service breadth for compute, data, messaging, and networking integration
- Granular IAM controls and VPC isolation for secure Bandwidth related deployments
- Strong managed services reduce operational load for scalable application backends
Cons
- Service complexity increases setup and troubleshooting time for new teams
- Distributed architecture requires careful monitoring and failure mode planning
- Cross service configuration can become fragmented without strong platform conventions
Best For
Teams building scalable telecom workflows on managed infrastructure
How to Choose the Right Bandwidth Software
This buyer's guide explains how to choose Bandwidth Software tooling for messaging, voice, authentication, directory, AAA, secure tunneling, and orchestration using tools such as MessageBird, Vonage, Nexmo, and Bandwidth Control Center. It also covers infrastructure and identity building blocks like OpenLDAP, FreeRADIUS, WireGuard, OpenAI, and AWS. The guide focuses on concrete selection criteria tied to specific capabilities described in each tool.
What Is Bandwidth Software?
Bandwidth Software refers to platforms that enable telecom-style capabilities such as SMS, programmable voice, delivery events, and service operations to run inside application and network workflows. It also includes the supporting components needed to authenticate users, authorize network access, and route traffic reliably across systems. Teams typically use API-first communications tools like MessageBird, Vonage, and Nexmo to embed messaging and call control into custom products. Operators use administrative visibility tools like Bandwidth Control Center to monitor service health and track usage for Bandwidth-managed delivery.
Key Features to Look For
The right feature set determines whether messaging and voice workflows run observably, route correctly, and integrate cleanly with identity, access control, and infrastructure.
Delivery and event webhooks for SMS and voice
Real-time delivery status and events enable automation driven by message outcomes rather than polling. MessageBird is built around delivery webhook events for SMS and voice that power status-driven workflows. Vonage also uses event-driven callbacks to synchronize application state with call activity.
Programmable voice and call routing with webhooks
Voice control requires call control endpoints and routing logic that can trigger when call state changes. Vonage stands out with Programmable Voice APIs for call control with webhooks and routing integration. MessageBird adds programmable voice capabilities designed for call routing and interactive voice experiences.
Multi-channel verification and identity checks
Verification is a core telecom need for login, onboarding, and identity assurance. Nexmo provides Verify APIs designed for multi-channel authentication and identity checks. OpenAI can complement verification by converting model output into structured workflow-ready fields used to drive verification flows in custom systems.
Service health, usage dashboards, and operational logs
Operational visibility reduces time-to-troubleshoot when campaigns or integrations misbehave. Bandwidth Control Center consolidates service health and usage dashboards plus logs tied to Bandwidth delivery. This helps teams validate changes and detect anomalies without stitching together multiple monitoring systems.
Standards-based directory integration with overlays
Directory services support consistent identity storage and lookup across network systems. OpenLDAP provides an overlay framework that adds behaviors without rewriting directory data models. This is valuable for telecom integration environments that require configurable schemas and access controls.
AAA policy enforcement with hot-pluggable RADIUS modules
AAA needs clear authorization logic and accounting records for network access workflows. FreeRADIUS offers hot-pluggable modules with tunable request, reply, and accounting processing. It also supports LDAP for identity lookup and SQL for policy and accounting storage.
How to Choose the Right Bandwidth Software
A workable choice starts by matching the tool to the workflow owner role, then validating event handling, routing control, and operational observability for the channels in scope.
Map the channels and workflow type to the right communications layer
If the goal is omnichannel messaging and programmable voice inside one developer workflow, MessageBird fits teams that unify SMS, voice, and chat-style messaging. If the goal is API-driven voice and messaging into existing business apps with SIP trunking, Vonage aligns with programmable communications and call activity webhooks. If verification and custom-built SMS and voice products are the priority, Nexmo targets REST APIs for SMS, voice, number management, and verification workflows.
Confirm event-driven integration depth before building automation
Use tools that emit delivery status and event callbacks for reliable automation. MessageBird supports delivery webhook events for SMS and voice that power real-time status-driven automation. Vonage provides event-driven callbacks that synchronize app state with call activity. Nexmo can work well for developers but requires solid backend expertise for complex event and webhook handling.
Plan routing, call orchestration, and multi-region testing upfront
Programmable voice requires intentional routing and orchestration logic in the application layer. Vonage supports call routing via programmable voice APIs but advanced call flows require developer work for reliable orchestration. MessageBird supports programmable voice with routing and can add complexity in multi-region behavior during testing and troubleshooting. Nexmo provides flexible number and routing controls for multi-region deployments and can still demand careful debugging for campaigns spanning regions.
Select the operational visibility tool based on who will troubleshoot
If the operational team must monitor Bandwidth-managed delivery health and usage in one console, Bandwidth Control Center is the direct fit. It unifies service status, usage tracking, operational reporting, and logs for troubleshooting workflows. This reduces manual correlation across external systems when diagnosing anomalies tied to Bandwidth delivery.
Choose identity, AAA, and network security components that match the authentication model
If externalized user or device identity lookup must be standardized across network services, pair OpenLDAP with application and telecom components. If network access requires AAA for Wi‑Fi or VPN with policy and accounting, FreeRADIUS provides authentication, authorization, and accounting with LDAP and SQL integrations. For secure transport between endpoints, WireGuard provides lightweight encrypted tunnels using AllowedIPs-based routing per peer, and AWS supplies infrastructure primitives like IAM and VPC isolation when scaling Bandwidth-related backends.
Who Needs Bandwidth Software?
Bandwidth-focused tooling benefits teams that build or operate messaging, voice, verification, and telecom-connected authentication and networking workflows.
Teams building omnichannel messaging plus programmable voice without channel duplication
MessageBird is the best match for teams that want unified SMS, voice, and chat-style messaging with a single developer workflow. Delivery webhook events for SMS and voice support real-time automation that depends on observable delivery outcomes.
Teams embedding API-driven voice and messaging into existing business applications
Vonage fits teams that want programmable voice and messaging APIs plus SIP trunking for voice architectures. Event-driven callbacks help keep application state aligned with call activity.
Developers building custom SMS, voice, and verification experiences with developer-first control
Nexmo targets developers who need REST API control for SMS, programmable voice calling, number management, and verification via Verify APIs. Multi-channel authentication and identity checks are central to the platform design.
Operators who need Bandwidth-managed service health and accountable usage tracking
Bandwidth Control Center supports teams that manage Bandwidth services and need dashboards tied to service status and usage. Centralized logs and operational dashboards reduce time spent validating changes and detecting anomalies.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Misalignment between workflow requirements and tool capabilities creates avoidable setup work and troubleshooting delays across the reviewed options.
Building automation without event visibility
Teams that start without confirming delivery notifications end up relying on brittle polling instead of workflow-ready events. MessageBird’s delivery webhook events for SMS and voice enable real-time status-driven automation, while Vonage’s event-driven callbacks synchronize application state with call activity.
Underestimating voice orchestration complexity
Voice-centric deployments require deliberate configuration and call control logic in the application layer. Vonage can require developer work for reliable orchestration of advanced call flows, and MessageBird voice setups can involve more setup than SMS-first deployments.
Ignoring webhook and multi-region integration debugging demands
Teams that treat webhook handling as plug-and-play get stuck when campaigns span regions. Nexmo requires solid backend expertise for complex event and webhook handling, and multi-region behavior can add testing and troubleshooting complexity in tools that support large routing scopes.
Using the wrong layer for operational troubleshooting
Teams that try to perform service health and usage validation inside application code lose time when diagnosing Bandwidth-managed delivery issues. Bandwidth Control Center provides unified service health, usage dashboards, and operational logs designed for troubleshooting workflows.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions using a weighted average. Features have weight 0.4, ease of use has weight 0.3, and value has weight 0.3. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. MessageBird separated from lower-ranked tools on features by emphasizing delivery webhook events for SMS and voice that power real-time status-driven automation, which directly strengthens workflow observability.
Frequently Asked Questions About Bandwidth Software
Which Bandwidth-focused tool provides operational visibility into service health and usage without stitching together external monitors?
Bandwidth Control Center consolidates service health, usage tracking, and operational dashboards into a single console for Bandwidth-managed delivery. It also supports troubleshooting workflows with logs tied to account services.
How do MessageBird and Vonage differ when building omnichannel messaging that includes voice and real-time delivery status automation?
MessageBird unifies SMS, voice, and chat-style messaging into one developer workflow and emphasizes delivery webhook events that drive real-time status automation. Vonage targets API-driven voice and messaging with programmable voice call control exposed through webhooks and routing integrations.
What solution fits verification-heavy authentication flows that need programmable control over SMS, voice, and identity checks?
Vonage Communications Platform (Nexmo) focuses on programmable communications APIs for SMS, voice, and verification workflows. Its Verify APIs support multi-channel authentication and identity checks that can connect directly to application logic.
When does an LDAP directory become necessary in telecom integrations alongside Bandwidth delivery systems?
LDAP for telecom integrations using OpenLDAP supports standards-based identity storage and lookup for users, devices, or subscribers. It enables consistent bind, search, and access control semantics when network services must query an external authentication source.
Which tool is best suited for AAA authentication and authorization for Wi-Fi or VPN access control in the same identity ecosystem as Bandwidth services?
FreeRADIUS provides AAA authentication, authorization, and accounting with a modular architecture. It integrates with LDAP for identity lookup and can store policy and accounting data in SQL, which supports attribute-based access rules.
Which networking component supports secure encrypted tunnels that can carry traffic to Bandwidth-linked backend services?
WireGuard is a lightweight VPN implementation that provides site-to-site and point-to-point encrypted tunnels using modern cryptography. Its peer-based configuration and AllowedIPs routing enable granular traffic control at the interface level.
How can AWS support event-driven telecom workflows that coordinate with Bandwidth delivery and call-related logic?
AWS builds telecom-adjacent architectures using services like SQS for queues and SNS for pub-sub event routing. AWS also offers API Gateway for request intake and IAM for fine-grained access control across the workflow.
What approach supports turning model outputs into workflow-ready fields for Bandwidth automation pipelines?
OpenAI enables structured outputs through tool and function calling patterns. That design helps convert model responses into deterministic workflow fields that can feed downstream automation around Bandwidth-driven communications.
Which tool is the right choice for centralized troubleshooting of Bandwidth-managed delivery failures when multiple systems log separately?
Bandwidth Control Center links operational dashboards and logs directly to Bandwidth-managed service health and usage. That reduces the need to correlate delivery problems across separate monitoring systems.
Conclusion
After evaluating 9 telecommunications connectivity, MessageBird stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
aws.amazon.comReferenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Telecommunications Connectivity alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of telecommunications connectivity tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare telecommunications connectivity tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.