GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Entertainment EventsTop 10 Best Audience Participation Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of Audience Participation Software for events, comparing Slido, Mentimeter, Kahoot and more with strengths and tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Slido
Real-time moderated Q&A with attendee voting
Built for conference teams running moderated live Q&A and polls at scale.
Mentimeter
Editor pickLive word clouds that update in real time as participants submit responses
Built for facilitators running interactive workshops and live remote participation sessions.
Kahoot!
Editor pickLive gamified quizzes with real-time scoreboards and instant result visuals
Built for live training sessions and classrooms needing fast audience participation.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates audience participation tools such as Slido, Mentimeter, Kahoot!, Vevox, and Poll Everywhere by integration depth, data model, and the automation plus API surface each platform exposes. It also contrasts admin and governance controls like RBAC, provisioning workflows, and audit log coverage so teams can map platform behavior to internal requirements. The table highlights configuration options, schema choices, and extensibility points that affect throughput and integration scope across live and on-demand sessions.
Slido
event engagementSlido runs live polls, Q&A, and audience engagement for events with web and mobile participant access.
Real-time moderated Q&A with attendee voting
Slido stands out for turning live sessions into interactive experiences with real-time Q&A and polls that fit directly into meeting workflows. Attendees can submit questions, vote, and upvote ideas while hosts moderate and keep discussions on track.
Moderators also gain structured results views for themes and common questions during and after events. Built-in integrations with common webinar and conferencing ecosystems reduce the friction of running participation activities.
- +Real-time Q&A with voting keeps large-group discussions focused
- +Polls, word clouds, and surveys support multiple participation formats
- +Moderation tools help hosts manage duplicates and inappropriate submissions
- +Event analytics summarize engagement and question themes for follow-up
- –Advanced setups can require more host steps than simpler poll tools
- –Design customization is limited compared with dedicated survey-first platforms
- –Highly complex workflows need planning to keep moderation efficient
- –Managing many concurrent sessions can feel operationally heavy for hosts
Event organizers running conferences or industry summits with speaking sessions
Collect live audience questions during each talk and route them through moderated Q&A with voting and upvoting
Higher relevance of audience Q&A, fewer off-topic questions, and better coverage of the topics that attendees care about most.
Corporate HR and internal communications teams hosting all-hands and leadership town halls
Run engagement polls and structured Q&A during all-hands meetings to gather employee sentiment and concerns
Documented engagement signals and a clear set of prioritized concerns that leadership can address in follow-up communications.
Show 2 more scenarios
Academic institutions and instructors running lectures, seminars, and remote classes
Use real-time participation activities such as polls and Q&A to check understanding and manage student questions during class
Improved feedback loop for teaching decisions and targeted follow-up instruction based on student question patterns.
Slido supports interactive participation where students can submit questions and vote on answers or topics, while instructors moderate the queue. The results views provide instructors with a breakdown of recurring questions and concept gaps.
Sales enablement and customer success teams running product webinars and training sessions
Facilitate attendee questions and prioritize troubleshooting topics through live Q&A and voting
More efficient Q&A that reduces repetitive troubleshooting and increases satisfaction with the training or product session.
Slido fits webinar and conferencing workflows by letting teams capture questions during the session and moderate them so the presenter addresses high-priority items first. Voting helps signal which issues or features matter most to attendees.
Best for: Conference teams running moderated live Q&A and polls at scale
More related reading
Mentimeter
interactive pollingMentimeter delivers real-time audience polls, Q&A, and interactive slides that presenters can launch during live events.
Live word clouds that update in real time as participants submit responses
Mentimeter stands out with real-time audience polling that turns responses into instantly generated visuals. It supports multiple question types like multiple choice, word clouds, and Q&A to keep workshops and meetings interactive.
Presenters can customize themes and display results on shared screens while participants join via link-based access. The live presentation flow and embedding options make it usable for events, training, and remote engagement.
- +Fast live polls with automatic visual charts for instant feedback
- +Multiple question types including word clouds and open Q&A
- +Brandable themes and screen-friendly layouts for speaker-led sessions
- +Flexible access via shareable links for in-room and remote participation
- –Advanced analysis and export options are limited for heavy reporting needs
- –Question setup is straightforward but can feel rigid for complex workshop flows
- –Customization beyond basic themes is less extensive than specialized survey tools
Corporate learning and enablement teams
Facilitating interactive training sessions with live polls, word clouds, and Q&A during webinars or in-room workshops
Higher engagement during training and faster collection of feedback that can inform follow-up materials.
Community managers and organizers running events and meetups
Driving audience participation during live talks and panel-style sessions using multiple choice questions and open Q&A
More questions from attendees and structured audience input that reduces manual moderation.
Show 1 more scenario
Remote team leads and internal communication owners
Gathering pulse-check feedback during distributed meetings with prompts that generate instant charts from participants' responses
Decision-ready insights from meeting participants without waiting for post-meeting surveys.
Mentimeter supports interactive questions that team members answer during a scheduled meeting using a browser. The resulting visuals appear during the session for quick discussion.
Best for: Facilitators running interactive workshops and live remote participation sessions
Kahoot!
game-based participationKahoot! hosts live quizzes and interactive game-based sessions that audiences join using a code.
Live gamified quizzes with real-time scoreboards and instant result visuals
Kahoot! stands out for turning live audience answers into fast, gamified moments with short question formats. It supports quiz, polls, and interactive slides that can run on participant devices while a presenter controls pacing and timing.
Built-in tools for question creation, moderation, and live result visuals help sessions stay engaging across classrooms and meetings. The platform is strongest for participation-driven content where speed, simplicity, and audience feedback are the main goals.
- +Real-time quiz gameplay with instant audience feedback
- +Presenter controls pacing and live results for smooth facilitation
- +Quick content creation using templates and question builder
- +Works well with mobile browsers and low setup overhead
- +Team-friendly moderation tools for session management
- –Limited depth for long-form interactive workflows beyond short questions
- –Less suited for complex scoring rules and multi-round logic
- –Customization stays within game format constraints for branding needs
- –Large sessions can feel crowded with minimal participant management
K-12 teachers running in-class review
Use Kahoot! quizzes during end-of-unit practice to turn student answers into live class rankings and feedback.
Teachers get immediate visibility into which concepts need reteaching based on aggregate live results.
Corporate L&D trainers delivering training sessions
Use Kahoot! polls and quizzes to validate learning during onboarding and compliance refreshers.
Trainers reduce follow-up time by identifying misconceptions while the session is still in progress.
Show 2 more scenarios
Event organizers and conference moderators
Run live audience Q&A-style engagement using interactive slides during keynote segments.
Speakers receive instant audience feedback that can inform the next segment of the program.
Interactive slides help moderators gather audience input on topics as the talk progresses. Participants can respond from their own devices while the host manages timing and transitions.
Community groups and workshop facilitators
Use Kahoot! question rounds for icebreakers and group activities in remote or hybrid sessions.
Facilitators increase participation by giving every attendee an easy way to respond during the session.
Gamified polls and quizzes provide a low-friction way for distributed participants to contribute during workshops. Live result screens keep groups oriented without requiring separate survey tools.
Best for: Live training sessions and classrooms needing fast audience participation
More related reading
Vevox
live Q&AVevox provides live audience polling and Q&A for meetings and events with presenter controls and participant voting.
Live Q&A moderation with voting and priority controls during the event
Vevox centers audience engagement with live polls, quizzes, and Q&A that work during presentations and events. It supports real-time moderator controls, question management, and interactive participation workflows.
The platform also offers results visualization and exporting options for captured engagement data. Use cases commonly include classrooms, conferences, and corporate town halls.
- +Real-time audience polls and quizzes with immediate visualization of results
- +Moderator tools for managing Q&A flow and participant questions
- +Fast attendee join experience using simple codes for live sessions
- –Limited depth for advanced survey logic compared to survey-first platforms
- –Analytics focus on session outputs rather than long-term audience trends
- –Customization of branding and UI is less flexible than white-label solutions
Best for: Facilitators running live Q&A and polling for classrooms and conferences
Poll Everywhere
survey and pollingPoll Everywhere powers audience polls, live surveys, and Q&A with participants joining via web or SMS.
Real-time slide-integrated polling with instant results display
Poll Everywhere stands out with real-time audience responses that work directly in an existing slide or webpage workflow. It supports polls, Q&A, quizzes, and word clouds, with results that can be displayed live or exported after sessions.
Moderation tools and accessibility options help facilitators manage participation at scale during meetings, trainings, and classroom sessions. Autogenerated participant responses can be used to drive follow-up discussion without requiring manual data collection.
- +Live polling inside slides with immediate visualization for audience feedback
- +Supports multiple interaction formats including polls, quizzes, and word clouds
- +Strong facilitation controls like moderation for managing participant responses
- +Exports and reporting help turn session results into actionable notes
- –Advanced question logic can feel limited compared to dedicated quiz platforms
- –Engagement features still rely on participants using provided methods
- –Results layouts need setup to match highly specific event branding
Best for: Educators and internal teams running live interactive sessions and Q&A
TurningPoint
classroom-style votingTurningPoint enables interactive audience participation with live polls, questions, and device-based or browser participation.
Live polling and interactive question slides with real-time results for each activity
TurningPoint stands out with classroom-tested audience interaction tools that emphasize live polling and interactive presentations. It supports real-time student or attendee responses across multiple device types and formats, including question slides and activity workflows. Moderation controls, results display, and engagement analytics help presenters manage participation during sessions and review outcomes afterward.
- +Real-time polling and interactive slide activities drive immediate audience participation
- +Presenter controls make it easy to manage questions and display results live
- +Built-in reporting supports session review with engagement and response summaries
- –Setup and device pairing can add friction compared with simpler web-only tools
- –Advanced presentation workflows require more presenter practice to run smoothly
Best for: Educators and trainers running frequent live interactive sessions with quick feedback
More related reading
Speecheloquence (Speechelo)
audience interactionSpeechelo supports interactive event participation workflows through audience input prompts and engagement features.
Speech-style refinement controls that shape delivery for interactive speaking segments
Speecheloquence focuses on transforming live presentation delivery into a more engaging audience experience with guided speaking style controls. The core capability centers on generating and refining voice output for speeches, announcements, and participatory prompts. Audience participation is supported through scripted delivery and timing that helps presenters run interactive segments consistently.
- +Voice-focused tools help keep interactive prompts sounding polished
- +Script-to-delivery workflow supports consistent participatory segments
- +Fast adjustments make it easier to iterate speaking style quickly
- –Limited native engagement mechanics like polls, voting, or live Q&A
- –Audience interaction relies more on scripting than in-tool participation
- –Less suitable for event teams needing multi-user coordination
Best for: Presenters adding scripted audience engagement with improved speech delivery
Sli.do (Sli.do)
conference engagementSli.do provides real-time event engagement with polls, Q&A, and audience feedback during conferences.
Moderator-led Q&A with audience upvoting and real-time question control
Sli.do stands out for running interactive audience sessions with a live, question-first experience that organizers can curate in real time. It supports audience Q&A, polls, and live reactions, plus moderation controls like upvoting and filtering to keep discussions focused. Event makers can brand the experience and manage participation flow through presenter views and question handling workflows.
- +Live Q&A with upvoting keeps answers prioritized by the audience
- +Presenter moderation tools help control question relevance during sessions
- +Works well for polls, Q&A, and reactions within one participation flow
- –Advanced customization options can feel limited for complex event requirements
- –Room-level workflows rely on manual setup for smooth transitions
- –Participation insights are useful but not as deep as dedicated analytics tools
Best for: Event teams needing moderated Q&A, polls, and reactions for live sessions
More related reading
Viberate (Event engagement)
event platformViberate helps run interactive audience experiences for events with engagement tools tied to event platforms.
Event engagement analytics that tie participation actions to specific interactive moments
Viberate focuses event engagement through interactive participation workflows tied to events and their audiences. It supports campaign-style fan engagement with app-integrated interactions, including participation and content-driven engagement mechanics. The platform also emphasizes data capture for measuring engagement actions, helping organizers assess which prompts drive participation.
- +Event-centric engagement flows built around participation actions
- +Strong engagement analytics for tracking which interactions drive participation
- +Designed to run branded participation moments inside event programs
- –Setup can require coordination with event operators and data sources
- –Less suited for lightweight, one-off audience prompts without structure
- –Customization depth may feel heavy for small teams
Best for: Event organizers needing interactive audience participation with measurable engagement tracking
AhaSlides
presentation interactivityAhaSlides enables live audience participation using polls, Q&A, and interactive activities linked to presentations.
Slide-based live Q&A with moderation controls and real-time response aggregation
AhaSlides stands out for its fast, slide-based audience interaction flow that turns presentations into real-time participation sessions. It supports live polls, Q&A, word clouds, and collaborative activities like brainstorming boards tied to slide content.
The tool focuses on collecting responses during a talk, then visualizing results instantly so facilitators can steer discussion. Session setup is lightweight compared with heavier webinar engagement suites.
- +Live poll, Q&A, and word cloud widgets update instantly during presentations
- +Slide-native editor lets facilitators design activities without switching tools
- +Participant access via a short code reduces setup friction for audiences
- +Results visualization stays on-brand and can be embedded into slide flows
- –Collaboration features are limited compared with dedicated engagement platforms
- –Advanced analytics for learning outcomes are not the primary focus
- –Long-running sessions can feel less structured than webinar-grade tools
- –Customization depth for complex branching activities is constrained
Best for: Teams running interactive presentations, workshops, and training discussions
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 entertainment events, Slido stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Audience Participation Software
This buyer's guide compares Slido, Mentimeter, Kahoot!, Vevox, Poll Everywhere, TurningPoint, Sli.do, Viberate, AhaSlides, and Speecheloquence using concrete capabilities shown in their event participation flows.
The guide focuses on integration depth, data model design, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls so event teams can choose tools that fit their operating model.
Sections cover key evaluation criteria, decision steps, audience-fit segments, and common implementation mistakes tied to specific tools and their tradeoffs.
Live participation platforms for moderated Q&A, polls, and audience response capture
Audience Participation Software delivers live polls, Q&A, quizzes, word clouds, or interactive slide activities that audiences trigger during meetings, classes, and conferences.
These tools solve participation latency and moderation problems by collecting responses in real time, showing results instantly, and letting hosts curate or prioritize inputs.
Tools like Slido and Vevox support moderated Q&A with voting and structured question handling for event teams that need controlled discussions at scale.
Integration, governance, and automation controls that determine event-day reliability
Audience participation tools fail operationally when they cannot fit an event stack, cannot expose participation data in usable structures, or cannot enforce host controls during peak input.
The criteria below map to how tools handle integration breadth, data model structure, automation via API and integrations, and admin governance like moderation workflow control and auditability.
These checks distinguish Slido, Mentimeter, and Poll Everywhere from tools that center on slide or quiz delivery without deeper control planes.
Moderated Q&A with attendee voting and priority controls
Slido enables real-time moderated Q&A where attendees submit questions, vote, and upvote ideas while hosts manage duplicates and inappropriate submissions. Vevox adds live Q&A moderation with voting and priority controls during events, which reduces moderation load when question volume spikes.
Slide-native or workflow-native delivery that reduces operator steps
Poll Everywhere powers real-time slide-integrated polling and Q&A so results display inside the existing slide or webpage workflow. AhaSlides adds a slide-native editor that turns presentations into live participation sessions with inline widgets for polls, Q&A, and word clouds.
Live visualization formats aligned to participation intent
Mentimeter updates live word clouds as participants submit responses, which supports ideation sessions and workshops that depend on rapid clustering. Kahoot! provides live gamified quizzes with real-time scoreboards and instant result visuals, which supports training pacing driven by short questions.
Extensible results handling, exports, and structured follow-up outputs
Slido includes event analytics that summarize engagement and question themes during and after events, which supports structured follow-up. Poll Everywhere supports exports and reporting that turn session results into actionable notes, while Vevox provides exporting options for captured engagement data.
Automation and API surface for provisioning and programmatic event control
Event teams that need repeatable participation programs should prioritize tools with documented automation and API access for creating participation sessions, reading engagement outputs, and connecting participation data to downstream systems. Slido is positioned for workflow fit with built-in integrations with common webinar and conferencing ecosystems, while Poll Everywhere emphasizes slide-integrated participation that fits existing content delivery systems.
Admin governance controls for moderation throughput under concurrent inputs
Slido’s moderation tools support duplicates management and handling inappropriate submissions, which directly affects moderator throughput. Sli.do adds moderator-led Q&A with audience upvoting and real-time question control, which helps governance by pushing prioritization into the event workflow.
A control-first selection process for participation reliability
The right tool depends on how event operators need to run moderation, how participation data must be captured for reporting, and how quickly the tool must fit into an existing event workflow.
Integration depth and automation access matter most when events run frequently and when participation outputs must feed downstream reporting or content review.
This process compares Slido, Mentimeter, Kahoot!, and Poll Everywhere by aligning tool mechanics to operational control needs.
Map the required participation mechanics to the tool’s native interaction model
If the event needs moderated Q&A at scale with duplicate handling and voting, Slido and Vevox match that interaction model. If the event needs ideation with fast aggregation, Mentimeter’s live word clouds align better than quiz-first formats like Kahoot!.
Choose workflow placement to minimize host steps on event day
If participation must appear inside slides without a separate operator workflow, Poll Everywhere and AhaSlides reduce setup friction by integrating polling widgets into the slide flow. If the event is structured as a hosted participation room with question-first curation, Slido and Sli.do emphasize moderated Q&A workflows.
Validate moderation governance for expected question volume and risk handling
For high-volume Q&A, Slido’s moderation tools for duplicates and inappropriate submissions and Vevox’s voting and priority controls reduce moderator bottlenecks. For events that rely on audience prioritization, Sli.do’s upvoting and real-time question control keeps the host loop short.
Confirm data capture outputs match downstream reporting needs
If engagement reporting must summarize themes and results after events, Slido’s structured results views and event analytics support that follow-up. If export-heavy reporting is required, Poll Everywhere and Vevox offer exporting options, while Mentimeter’s advanced analysis and export options are limited for heavy reporting.
Test integration fit and automation expectations before committing to production use
For teams running webinar and conferencing ecosystems, Slido’s built-in integrations reduce friction when launching participation inside meeting workflows. For organizations that require automation and API-based provisioning, prioritize tools with a documented automation and API surface that can create and read participation data without manual exports.
Which teams get the most control from each participation tool
Different participation tools concentrate their strengths in moderation, slide embedding, quiz pacing, or event-centric engagement data capture.
The best fit depends on the operator workload, the required interaction types, and how participation outputs must be used after the event.
The segments below map directly to the tools’ stated best-fit contexts.
Conference teams running moderated live Q&A and polls at scale
Slido fits because it supports real-time moderated Q&A with attendee voting and host moderation tools that manage duplicates and inappropriate submissions. Sli.do also supports moderated Q&A with audience upvoting and real-time question control when event teams need a tightly guided question flow.
Facilitators running interactive workshops and live remote participation sessions
Mentimeter fits because it generates live visuals from responses with multiple question types like word clouds and open Q&A. AhaSlides also fits workshop discussions when the interaction must stay slide-native with live polling and moderation controls.
Educators and trainers prioritizing fast audience feedback and quiz pacing
Kahoot! fits classrooms and training sessions that need gamified quiz moments with real-time scoreboards and instant visuals. TurningPoint fits frequent interactive sessions when device-based or browser participation and interactive question slides with real-time results support classroom cadence.
Organizations that need measurable event participation analytics tied to interactive moments
Viberate fits event operators that need engagement analytics tied to specific interactive moments and participation actions. Slido also supports event analytics with engagement and question theme summaries that support structured follow-up even when moderation is the primary focus.
Operational pitfalls that appear when the participation model and governance model mismatch
Common failures come from selecting a tool that cannot moderate efficiently, cannot export structured outputs, or requires manual steps that break under event pressure.
Another failure comes from choosing a slide or quiz centric workflow when the event needs full moderated Q&A governance. The mistakes below map directly to tool constraints and tradeoffs described in their use cases.
Choosing quiz-first tools for high-volume moderated Q&A
Kahoot! excels at short gamified quizzes with real-time scoreboards, but it is less suited for long-form interactive workflows and complex scoring logic. Slido and Vevox better match events that require moderated Q&A with voting and priority controls during the event.
Underestimating setup and moderation overhead for advanced workflows
Slido can require more host steps for advanced setups, so event teams should pre-plan moderation workflows to keep duplicates handling efficient. Sli.do’s room-level workflows rely more on manual setup for smooth transitions, which can create friction if question flow is not rehearsed.
Relying on limited export and analysis when reporting requirements are heavy
Mentimeter’s advanced analysis and export options are limited for heavy reporting needs, which can constrain post-event reporting depth. Poll Everywhere and Vevox provide exports and exporting options that better support turning session outputs into follow-up notes.
Expecting deep customization from tools that constrain branding to templates
Slido has limited design customization compared with dedicated survey-first platforms, and Kahoot! stays within game format constraints for branding. Poll Everywhere and AhaSlides provide on-brand results and embedding into slide flows, which suits screen-forward events more directly than heavy UI redesign requirements.
Selecting a tool that captures engagement but needs extra coordination for data sources
Viberate can require coordination with event operators and data sources, which can slow adoption if data pipelines are not ready. Slido and Sli.do focus on moderated live question and engagement flows that work as the primary participation surface without requiring external data source wiring.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Slido, Mentimeter, Kahoot!, Vevox, Poll Everywhere, TurningPoint, Sli.Do, Viberate, AhaSlides, and Speecheloquence using a criteria-based scoring approach built from features, ease of use, and value. Features carried the most weight at 40% because live participation outcomes depend on question types, moderation mechanics, and results handling. Ease of use and value each accounted for 30% because event teams need operator speed and reliable session execution. The ranking reflects consistent scoring patterns across each tool’s strengths and tradeoffs shown in the provided tool capabilities and limitations.
Slido separated itself from lower-ranked tools through its real-time moderated Q&A with attendee voting and its structured results views that summarize engagement and question themes during and after events. That capability lifted the features score for governance and follow-up reporting, which then influenced the overall ranking more than presentation-only interaction tools.
Frequently Asked Questions About Audience Participation Software
How do Slido, Sli.do, and Vevox differ in moderated Q&A workflows?
Which tools are best for slide-first interaction, and how do they handle Q&A alongside polls?
What integration and embedding options matter for recurring webinar and conference workflows?
How do API and automation capabilities affect exporting engagement data and syncing with other systems?
What session types are strongest for Mentimeter versus Kahoot! during remote workshops and training?
How do the tools manage participant pacing and timing during live events?
Which platform supports collaborative brainstorming boards during a live session?
What admin controls and governance features are most relevant for large conferences with many questions?
How does data model design change when audience engagement must map to event moments?
When scripted delivery is required for interactive participation, which tool handles it best?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Entertainment Events alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of entertainment events tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare entertainment events tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.