GITNUX MARKETDATA REPORT 2024

Must-Know Stem Education Statistics [Latest Report]

Highlights: The Most Important Stem Education Statistics

  • By 2025, 2 million jobs will go unfilled due to the lack of qualified STEM talent.
  • As of 2018, 7.6 million people held STEM jobs in the United States.
  • Jobs in STEM are expected to grow by 8.9% between 2014 and 2024.
  • Approximately 28% of high school freshmen declare an interest in a STEM-related field.
  • STEM majors who are women account for only 28% of the total students.
  • Only about 13% of the world’s engineers are women.
  • In 2018, Hispanics made up only 7% of all STEM workers in the U.S.
  • 60% of U.S. bachelor’s degree holders in STEM fields don’t work in STEM occupations.
  • U.S. students ranked 38 out of 71 in math on the worldwide PISA test in 2015.
  • Women hold less than 25% of STEM jobs in the US.
  • African-Americans represent 11% of the U.S. workforce but only 9% of STEM workers.
  • Students who take AP Exam courses in high school are much more likely than their peers to graduate with a STEM degree.
  • In 2019, only about 18% of computer science bachelor’s degrees in the U.S. were awarded to women.
  • By 2022, it is predicted World-wide there will be shortage of 85 million tech workers.
  • In 2015 in the UK, only 9% of the engineering workforce was female.
  • In 2015, only 29% of environmental scientists and geoscientists were female.

Table of Contents

In today’s rapidly evolving digital era, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education is increasingly taking center stage in shaping our future. Its profound impact on individual development, job creation, and global economy is undeniable. But just how significant is this educational approach? By exploring a treasure trove of facts and numbers, our blog post will delve into the intriguing world of STEM Education Statistics. Get ready to be enlightened about the compelling trends and surprising truths surrounding this pivotal sector of education, undeniably painting a picture of our potential future.

The Latest Stem Education Statistics Unveiled

By 2025, 2 million jobs will go unfilled due to the lack of qualified STEM talent.

Contemplating upon the glaring forecast that by 2025, the gaping void in STEM fields might render 2 million jobs unoccupied, brings an unignorable urgency to the discourse around STEM Education Statistics. This stark projection holds the torch to the urgent need for industries, educators, and policymakers to pivot decisively towards comprehensive STEM education strategies. It shines a spotlight on the dire prospect that the insufficient supply of STEM competency may impede progress and productivity across sectors, underlining the need for a greater focus on fostering and cultivating more expertise in these critical areas. Ultimately, this statistic serves as a cogent clarion call to heighten our collective efforts to nurture STEM talent and future-proof the economy.

As of 2018, 7.6 million people held STEM jobs in the United States.

Painting the vivid landscape of STEM education with numerical imagery, the statistic that 7.6 million people held STEM jobs in the United States as of 2018 regales a potent narrative. It provides a tangible measure of the vibrant ecosystem of STEM careers, underlining the blossoming opportunities for students who pursue such pathways. This is a quantifiable testament to the vital nature of STEM education, illustrating the relative high demand for professionals adept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Using this significant statistic, we open a gateway into understanding the impact STEM education has on the workforce, and consequently, the economy as a whole. It’s akin to holding a mirror to the future, refracting the luminous potential benefits of our continued investment and refinement of STEM education strategies.

Jobs in STEM are expected to grow by 8.9% between 2014 and 2024.

Draped in data, the statistics: ‘Jobs in STEM expected to proliferate by 8.9% between 2014 and 2024’, act as a beacon for the future, heralding an era where STEM-centric professions take center stage. This forecast not only underpins the increasing influence of STEM fields in our increasingly technology-driven and digitally-dependent world, but also underlines the urgency and importance of investing in STEM education. With this statistic in hand, we illuminate the path ahead and shape the narrative for our blog post on STEM education statistics. We posit the compelling argument that harnessing and nurturing scientific curiosity today, will translate into a highly skilled workforce tomorrow, poised to meet the growing demand for STEM professionals. This figure serves not as a distant echo, but rather a resounding call to action for educators, policy makers, parents and students alike, to recognize the critical role of STEM education and its potential impact on our global workforce and economy.

Approximately 28% of high school freshmen declare an interest in a STEM-related field.

Peeling back the layers of the STEM education landscape, one unearths a striking fact that about 28% of high school freshmen are already envisioning a future in STEM-related fields. This figure emanates a luminary beacon highlighting the early onset of scientific curiosity and technological zeal amongst our young scholars. Not merely a numerical value, this 28% embodies the burgeoning passion for STEM that can transform our society.

In the flowing narrative of a blog post concerning STEM Education Statistics, this revelation serves as a potent plot twist. It accentuates the unfolding story of how early interest in STEM shapes the educational terrain and sets the stage for future innovations. The discussion around this statistic invites the readers to envisage the potential scientific upsurge that these young minds could bring about.

Furthermore, it ignites a dialogue on the importance of empowering this enthusiastic 28% through robust initiatives, effective policies, and innovative educational strategies. Finally, this statistic artfully sets the precedence for dissecting more complex layers of STEM statistics, bridging the gap between raw numbers and their profound implications on our collective future.

STEM majors who are women account for only 28% of the total students.

Delving into the symbol of ‘28%’, it unveils a significant narrative about gender disparity in STEM education. This number serves as a magnifying glass, highlighting the underrepresentation of women within these academically demanding fields. It illuminates a critical area for improvement and presents a call-to-action in our ongoing effort to secure balance in the STEM educational landscape. Given this stark disparity, anyone caring for the evolution of STEM education would be more than provoked to address this imbalance, thereby fostering a conducive, enabling, and inspiring environment for women in these fields. This discerning figure, therefore, not only enriches our understanding but also informs the discourse on gender equality in STEM education.

Only about 13% of the world’s engineers are women.

Highlighting the statistic that only about 13% of the world’s engineers are women serves as a poignant commentary on the current state of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education. It underscores the prevalent gender imbalance in this field, raising critical questions about inclusivity and gender parity in STEM. As we delve deeper into STEM education statistics, this figure sharpens our focus on the barriers that deter women from pursuing engineering and other STEM careers. It acts as a mirror, reflecting the stark realities of gender bias at both academic and professional levels. But this statistic also becomes a call to action. It illuminates the path towards fostering greater female representation in engineering, sparking important conversations about the strategies needed to inspire and encourage more women and girls to carve their future in the STEM world.

In 2018, Hispanics made up only 7% of all STEM workers in the U.S.

In unfolding the narrative surrounding STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education Statistics, it’s essential to shine a spotlight on an under-emphasized statistic: As of 2018, Hispanics comprised a mere 7% of all STEM workers in the U.S. This figure not only underscores the representation gap in these critical sectors but also suggests potential untapped talent. Highlighting such a statistic amplifies the call for initiatives to scaffold Hispanic involvement in STEM fields, thereby empowering a diverse range of voices and perspectives. Through such varied viewpoints, one can spur innovation, productivity, and competitiveness further in STEM industries. Intriguingly, this discussion also provokes thought on how to make STEM career pathways more inclusive and accessible.

60% of U.S. bachelor’s degree holders in STEM fields don’t work in STEM occupations.

Delving into the peculiar realm of STEM education statistics, one can’t help but stumble upon a fascinating nugget of data: A surprising 60% of U.S. bachelor’s degree holders in STEM fields are not employed in STEM occupations. This percentage is not merely a number, but a story waiting to be unraveled and understood in our quest to straddle the intricacies of STEM education.

In this intriguing tale of numbers, we explore how a majority of those armed with STEM degrees are finding employment outside of their study niche. This statistic could be pointing to the great versatility and applicability of a STEM education. It might indicate that the analytical and problem-solving skills developed within these pursuits are highly valued and transferable across a variety of fields.

Alternatively, it could be hinting at potential issues within the STEM industry itself. Are there enough absorbing and lucrative career opportunities in the industry to retain these graduates? Are we experiencing a surplus of STEM graduates where the demand does not meet supply? Do these graduates find the STEM field less appealing once they’ve sampled the workforce?

It can also shed light on the effectiveness of STEM education. If a large portion of these degree holders are not working in the associated fields, it may point to the need for improvements or modifications in how STEM education is designed and imparted.

Hence, this statistic serves as a compass, directing our exploration of STEM education’s real-world implications. By understanding such aspects, we, as a society, can better strategize and maximize the potency of a STEM education for future generations.

U.S. students ranked 38 out of 71 in math on the worldwide PISA test in 2015.

Highlighting the 2015 global PISA statistic, which saw U.S students positioned at 38 out of 71 in math, is like igniting a powerful beacon that underscores the urgency for a renewed focus on STEM education. This numerical narrative is a stark wake-up call, spotlighting the fact that the battleground of mathematics excellence is internationally competitive, and the United States currently lags behind. Bringing this statistic into the limelight, the blog post on STEM Education Statistics provides an intriguing launchpad to discuss strategies that could propel U.S. learners to the leading edge of mathematical excellence on a global stage.

Women hold less than 25% of STEM jobs in the US.

Weaving through a tapestry of STEM education statistics, a thread stands out rather strikingly: women occupy lesser than 25% of the STEM jobs in the US. This number ripples much farther than one might think and its importance can’t be overstressed.

In a hyper-connected world accelerating on technologies, STEM fields – Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, are the hard-core drivers. These fields are not just teeming with ideas that revolutionize the world, but are home to some of the highest-paying jobs. Yet, if three-quarters of those manpower driving these fields are men, we are clearly overseeing or misplacing rich talent, diversity, and potential innovation opportunities budding in the other half of the population.

Such a significant gender discrepancy hints at the underlying obstacles that women might face throughout their journey in the STEM medium, ranging from subtle biases in classrooms and workplaces, to lack of role models, and the prevalent misconceptions. Illuminate this statistic in any related narrative and it becomes a stark reminder that our efforts to engage girls and women in STEM education needs to be amplified and diversified.

The ramifications of not paying heed to this statistic, not only impede our progress towards gender equality but could also restrict the pace of our scientific and technological advancements in the long run.

African-Americans represent 11% of the U.S. workforce but only 9% of STEM workers.

Delving into the realm of STEM Education Statistics reveals a noticeable discrepancy: African-Americans make up 11% of the U.S. workforce, yet their representation drops to a mere 9% within STEM-related careers. This disparity shines a reflective light on the root of the issue, the accessibility and inclusivity of STEM education to diverse segments of the populace. This highlights urgent calls for enhanced, early exposure to STEM fields, as well as support systems to ensure equal opportunity in securing STEM occupations. Engaging in a thoughtful discourse on this issue helps strategize long-term interventions and potentially inspires subsequent generations of minority STEM professionals, overturning the status quo and creating a more balanced landscape. The future of STEM relies upon harnessing the power of diversity, and these statistics strongly indicate that we still have significant strides to make in this direction.

Students who take AP Exam courses in high school are much more likely than their peers to graduate with a STEM degree.

Delving into the heart of that cogent number, it offers us a telling glimpse into the powerful link between early exposure to rigorous courses like AP Exams in high school and future success in STEM fields. The propensity of these high school students to graduate with a STEM degree illuminates the probable effectiveness of nurturing budding interests and fostering academic rigor from a young age to shape tomorrow’s science and technology leaders. Mirroring the prevalence of STEM in today’s world, the statistic underscores the pivotal role early education plays in equipping students to navigate and contribute to a world heavily reliant on science, technology, engineering and mathematics. In the larger discourse about STEM education statistics, it contributes a compelling narrative about the importance of investing in and strengthening robust high school programs like AP Exams to cultivate and sustain interest in STEM starting from the formative education years.

In 2019, only about 18% of computer science bachelor’s degrees in the U.S. were awarded to women.

The vibrancy of the statistic ‘18% of computer science bachelor’s degrees in the U.S. awarded to women in 2019’ emerges like a beacon within the larger conversation of STEM education statistics. It is a stark testament to the gender disparity that currently exists in a field central to today’s technology-driven society. This discrepancy not only awakens us to the underrepresentation of women in computer science, it also ignites critical discourse on the importance of cultivating diversity and inclusivity within STEM education. By participating in this intellectual exchange, we get the opportunity to explore potential solutions whilst challenging ourselves, and the educational system, to ensure STEM fields are a panorama of diverse minds.

By 2022, it is predicted World-wide there will be shortage of 85 million tech workers.

Projected to strike a deficit of 85 million tech workers globally by 2022, this dramatic statistic lights a fire under the importance of STEM education. It’s not just a forecast, but a loud clarion call. Drawing attention to the imperative need for accelerating STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education, it underscores the global dilemma we are on the brink of facing.

Visualize this – a shortage on this scale could potentially descend our technologically driven world into chaos, hampering innovation and stalling growth. Now, isn’t this a compelling case in point for nurturing young minds towards STEM? It puts us square in front of the reality and amplifies the voice advocating for STEM education.

This statistic reinforces our role in empowering today’s students – tomorrow’s workforce, with a robust foundation in these subjects. The ticking time bomb of a statistic, of an impending worldwide shortfall of 85 million tech workers, accentuates the alarmingly widening gap in the tech industry and emphasizes why STEM Education needs to be our top priority in a blog post about its statistics.

In 2015 in the UK, only 9% of the engineering workforce was female.

Casting one’s gaze on the 2015 statistic that suggests a mere 9% of the UK engineering workforce was female reveals an underlying narrative about gender imbalances in STEM-related fields. This datapoint weaves a tapestry of silent stories echoing through the halls of engineering firms – stories of potential female engineers suppressed by a palpable gender gap. It begs the question of how STEM education translates into real world professions, calling us to scrutinize the ingrained biases and structural barriers that may be thwarting the transition of women from the classroom to the engineering workspace. This quantitative snapshot propels the discourse further by casting a spotlight on the imperative need for concrete actions to democratize STEM education, and by extension, the STEM workforce. Far from insurmountable, this imbalance invites us to reimagine, reinvent, and realign the relationship between gender and STEM education. Ultimately, it sends a loud, unmistakable signal: the time for change is now.

In 2015, only 29% of environmental scientists and geoscientists were female.

Highlighting the 2015 data that only 29% of environmental scientists and geoscientists were female underpins an important narrative in the discussion around STEM education statistics. It drives home the crucial point that gender imbalances persistently exist in these sectors, hinting at potential barriers that prevent women from equally participating or advancing in these fields. In turn, this statistic compels us to delve deeper into the underlying factors contributing to this discrepancy, such as societal attitudes, educational opportunities, and workplace environments. It underscores the pressing need for improvements within the STEM education framework, to inspire and empower a new generation of female scholars and professionals. Ultimately, this statistic serves as a compass, guiding the focus of the post towards the urgency for more inclusive, equitable policies and practices in STEM education.

Conclusion

In summary, STEM education statistics provide an illuminating snapshot of the current condition of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning. These fields play a crucial role not only in fueling innovation and technological advancement, but also in developing critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills among learners. However, despite its importance, current statistics reveal gaps in terms of gender, race, and economic disparities which merits our urgent attention. Ensuring inclusivity and accessibility to quality STEM education is not only beneficial for individual learners, but is also vital to our global competitiveness. It is crucial that stakeholders –from educators to policymakers– leverage these statistics to inform future efforts that aim to improve teaching approaches, advance diversity, and ultimately strengthen our global standing in these pivotal fields.

References

0. – https://www.www.educationdive.com

1. – https://www.www.census.gov

2. – https://www.www.pewresearch.org

3. – https://www.www.edweek.org

4. – https://www.www.engineeringforkids.com

5. – https://www.www.whitehouse.gov

6. – https://www.bootcamp.cvn.columbia.edu

7. – https://www.www.edtechmagazine.com

8. – https://www.www.engineeringuk.com

9. – https://www.www.catalyst.org

10. – https://www.worldwidewe.com

11. – https://www.nces.ed.gov

12. – https://www.www.ncwit.org

13. – https://www.www.scientificamerican.com

14. – https://www.www.aft.org

FAQs

What does STEM stand for in the context of education?

STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It is an educational approach which integrates these four disciplines into a cohesive learning paradigm based on real-world applications.

Why is STEM education important?

STEM education fosters critical thinking, problem-solving capabilities, creativity, and innovative mentality. It is also vital for equipping students with the skills necessary to excel in the fast-growing, high-demand fields of the modern world.

How does STEM education enhance a student's learning experience?

STEM education integrates multiple disciplines, encouraging students to apply knowledge in one area to understand others. It makes learning more engaging and relatable to real-world scenarios, promoting active, experiential learning rather than passive memorization.

Is STEM education beneficial for all students, or only those planning to pursue careers in related fields?

While STEM education proves highly beneficial for students planning careers in related fields, it's advantageous for all students, regardless of their career aspirations. The skills developed through STEM, like problem-solving, logical thinking, and creativity, are valuable in any area of work or life.

What are some examples of STEM education in practice?

Examples of STEM education range from basic science experiments in elementary grades to more complex projects like robotics programming, designing and building structures, or solving real-world problems using mathematical models. More advanced instances are seen in high schools and universities, where students often engage in in-depth research and innovative projects.

How we write our statistic reports:

We have not conducted any studies ourselves. Our article provides a summary of all the statistics and studies available at the time of writing. We are solely presenting a summary, not expressing our own opinion. We have collected all statistics within our internal database. In some cases, we use Artificial Intelligence for formulating the statistics. The articles are updated regularly.

See our Editorial Process.

Table of Contents