Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Virtual Party Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Wedding Event Planning

Top 10 Best Virtual Party Services of 2026

Compare virtual party services for planning teams, with tradeoffs and fit guidance for events like games, hosts, and venue-free moments.

19 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Virtual party services coordinate hosted sessions that blend entertainment, group interaction, and event operations for distributed teams and families. This comparison helps planners weigh hosted quiz nights, virtual museum experiences, and interactive game formats against operational fit, scheduling workflows, and the degree of facilitation needed, including options such as Confetti for teams that want someone to run the session end to end.

Hooray Teams is the best choice for planners who want staffed emcee facilitation with cue-based backstage coordination because that run of show keeps live entertainment and interaction flowing without last-minute scrambling, while Go Game fits teams needing host-led timed interactive games with structured pacing.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Hooray Teams

Staffed emcee facilitation plus cue-based backstage coordination tied to a prebuilt run of show.

Best for: Fits when planners need staffed production and moderated audience engagement for virtual celebrations.

2

Confetti

Editor pick

Run-of-show cue coordination for emcee-led segments, designed to keep interactive games and transitions on timing.

Best for: Fits when teams want hosted virtual party production with guided facilitation and structured audience engagement.

3

TeamBuilding

Editor pick

Run of show and production cue sheets for live emcee timing across interactive games.

Best for: Fits when event planners need managed virtual party production with guided facilitation.

Comparison Table

1
Hooray TeamsBest overall
specialist
9.2/10
Overall
2
specialist
8.8/10
Overall
3
specialist
8.6/10
Overall
4
agency
8.4/10
Overall
5
specialist
8.3/10
Overall
6
specialist
7.9/10
Overall
7
7.6/10
Overall
8
specialist
7.2/10
Overall
9
6.9/10
Overall
10
specialist
6.6/10
Overall
#1

Hooray Teams

specialist

Remote culture and team event provider that organizes virtual holiday parties and hosted online group activities.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

Staffed emcee facilitation plus cue-based backstage coordination tied to a prebuilt run of show.

For event planners who need more than video conferencing, Hooray Teams supplies a staffed production model that pairs emcee facilitation with a structured run of show and technical rehearsal support. The engagement layer centers on moderated audience interaction and interactive segments that keep participation active across a live stream. The operator workflow is designed around cueing and backstage coordination so speakers and performers get consistent guidance before the live moment.

A key tradeoff is that the managed production approach can require more coordination with Hooray Teams than a do-it-yourself virtual venue setup. Hooray Teams fits best for organizations running celebratory or marketing events where timing, entertainment flow, and audience moderation matter more than building custom tooling.

Pros
  • +Managed facilitation reduces coordination risk during live party segments
  • +Run-of-show planning helps keep entertainment and speaker flow on schedule
  • +Rehearsal and cueing workflows support consistent production execution
  • +Audience moderation keeps live chat interaction structured
Cons
  • –Managed delivery adds planning dependency versus self-serve event tools
  • –Customization depth is limited when planners want fully DIY experiences
  • –Interactive segments may require advance assets and segment approvals
  • –Complex production changes later in the timeline increase coordination load
Use scenarios
  • Event marketing teams

    Live brand party with moderated audience moments

    Higher participation during key segments

  • People operations teams

    Employee celebration with rehearsed entertainment flow

    Smoother transitions between acts

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Agency event producers

    Client event needing turnkey virtual hosting

    Fewer last-minute hosting failures

    Hooray Teams coordinates facilitation so client stakeholders focus on approvals and assets.

  • Community organizers

    Interactive online party with structured chat

    More engagement with less chaos

    Moderation and interactive segments structure participation while staying on schedule.

Best for: Fits when planners need staffed production and moderated audience engagement for virtual celebrations.

#2

Confetti

specialist

Virtual team building company that runs hosted online parties, games, and social events for distributed teams.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Run-of-show cue coordination for emcee-led segments, designed to keep interactive games and transitions on timing.

Confetti is a virtual party service provider focused on hosted event experiences with emcee-led production and interactive segments. It supports attendee engagement flows such as live games and moderated chat, with run-of-show control used to coordinate cues and pacing across the event.

The service is geared toward end-to-end virtual event production rather than DIY-only webinar hosting. Confetti also emphasizes post-event delivery and replay so attendees can revisit the session content.

Pros
  • +Emcee facilitation coordinates pacing, cues, and transitions across the live program
  • +Interactive game formats keep engagement moving without requiring complex participant tooling
  • +Moderated chat workflow reduces off-topic drift during the live party
  • +Replay delivery supports follow-up viewing for attendees who missed segments
Cons
  • –Event outcomes depend on production coordination, which limits fully self-serve control
  • –Breakout-style participation is not the primary strength versus single-room party formats
  • –Technical rehearsal depth can require planning time to avoid connectivity surprises
  • –Extensibility for custom integrations can feel limited compared with full webinar platforms
Use scenarios
  • HR and culture teams

    Remote employee engagement party

    Higher live participation

  • Marketing event coordinators

    Customer community virtual kickoff

    Better attendee engagement

Show 1 more scenario
  • Nonprofit program staff

    Fundraiser with live interaction

    Reusable event content

    Coordinated cues and replay delivery help supporters follow the program and revisit highlights.

Best for: Fits when teams want hosted virtual party production with guided facilitation and structured audience engagement.

#3

TeamBuilding

specialist

Remote event company that offers hosted virtual holiday parties, games, and online social experiences.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Run of show and production cue sheets for live emcee timing across interactive games.

TeamBuilding runs virtual party events with a production-led workflow that pairs emcee facilitation with guided game pacing. The service coordinates attendee onboarding, moderated chat mechanics, and live facilitation cues through a run of show built for remote sessions.

Engagement analytics and event recording delivery support post-event review for organizers. Delivery quality centers on live moderation rather than self-serve templates.

Pros
  • +Production cue sheet approach keeps live pacing consistent across sessions
  • +Emcee facilitation supports interactive segments without instructor improvisation
  • +Moderated chat reduces derailments during high-participation games
  • +Event recording delivery helps teams reuse content for follow-up
Cons
  • –Agenda changes late in planning can require re-running facilitation prep
  • –Limited self-serve customization compared with DIY virtual event builders
  • –Breakout room formats depend on the pre-scripted interaction design
  • –Accessibility polish relies on the chosen format rather than granular controls
Use scenarios
  • Team lead groups

    Remote team bonding event

    Stronger team rapport

  • People ops managers

    Onboarding session with activities

    Faster social connection

Show 2 more scenarios
  • L&D coordinators

    Training-themed virtual party

    Clear training takeaways

    Run-of-show cues and event recording support follow-up review for attendees.

  • Operations analysts

    Engagement review after events

    Measurable participation

    Engagement analytics and recordings give organizers evidence for future session planning.

Best for: Fits when event planners need managed virtual party production with guided facilitation.

#4

Go Game

agency

Corporate event company that produces virtual parties, online game shows, and remote team celebrations.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Host-led game facilitation with timed activities designed for participant engagement during live party sessions.

Go Game is geared toward event planners who need a host-led party experience with a clear production cue sheet and live moderation. It focuses on interactive segments that keep attendees active during the session, with facilitator-led pacing that reduces awkward downtime. Production coordination work can include rehearsal planning and a structured run-of-show so the party stays on timeline. This makes Go Game more suitable for parties and team celebrations than for purely informational webinars.

Pros
  • +Interactive game-led facilitation keeps attendees moving through timed segments
  • +Run-of-show support helps planners keep remote parties on schedule
  • +Facilitator moderation reduces participant friction during live moments
  • +Game format options support different group sizes and session lengths
Cons
  • –Game customization can be limited by the underlying game format
  • –Planning effort is higher than for simple video calls
  • –Advanced multi-track production needs may exceed scope
  • –Accessibility features depend on the selected game mechanics
Use scenarios
  • Corporate event planners

    Remote team celebration party session

    Lower downtime, higher participation

  • HR and internal communications

    Onboarding or anniversary engagement activity

    Better social connection metrics

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Community program managers

    Membership meetup with interactive format

    Smoother engagement for all

    A live host moderates participation so the event stays inclusive across remote attendees.

  • Event operations leads

    Seasonal party with custom themes

    Consistent experience across runs

    Planners map a party theme into timed gameplay segments with rehearsal guidance.

Best for: Fits when planners need a host-led, interactive party with structured pacing for remote groups.

#5

Quiz Coconut

specialist

Hosted entertainment company that specializes in virtual quiz nights and online party events for groups and workplaces.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Facilitator-led round control that standardizes question delivery and scoring across live sessions.

Quiz Coconut is designed around quiz production as the core virtual party experience, with an event run flow that guides the emcee through each round. This makes the service a good match for planners who need predictable pacing and a consistent audience interaction loop without building custom game logic. The strongest fit appears when the event is primarily a live, facilitated game rather than a general-purpose webinar shell.

Pros
  • +Facilitated quiz pacing reduces organizer micromanagement during the stream
  • +Round-based structure keeps scoring and transitions consistent
  • +Engagement mechanics run on the quiz format instead of add-on apps
  • +Post-event replay delivery supports follow-up sharing
Cons
  • –Custom agenda segments beyond quizzes need separate event coverage
  • –Quiz design flexibility can be limited versus fully custom interactive platforms
  • –Moderation is geared to quiz flow rather than open-form chat marathons
Use scenarios
  • HR teams

    Company quiz night for remote staff

    Higher attendance during the event

  • Event planners

    Virtual party with a single anchor activity

    Fewer production surprises

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Community organizers

    Fundraiser quiz with friendly competition

    Sustained audience attention

    The service manages live gameplay to keep the audience engaged through multiple rounds.

  • Sales enablement teams

    Onboarding fun quiz for new cohorts

    Faster group bonding

    Participant onboarding supports smooth entry into live quiz sessions.

Best for: Fits when planners need a moderated quiz as the main virtual party activity.

#6

Museum Hack

specialist

Guided virtual museum tours and interactive party events led by professional hosts.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Facilitator-led museum-themed party scripts with real-time audience prompts and pacing management.

Museum Hack delivers virtual party programming through hosted experiences built around guided storytelling and interactive audience moments. Sessions typically include a live facilitator who manages pacing, audience prompts, and on-camera interactions to keep groups engaged.

Pros
  • +Live facilitator format keeps energy consistent across large groups
  • +Guided storytelling structure gives guests clear participation prompts
  • +Run-of-show coordination reduces timing drift during the event
  • +Entertainment-led production reduces burden on hosts
Cons
  • –Limited self-serve control compared with tool-first virtual event platforms
  • –Interactive elements depend on facilitator moderation and attendee participation
  • –Technical depth for streaming workflows is not the primary deliverable
  • –Breakout-style customization is constrained versus event production studios
Use scenarios
  • Private event planners

    Interactive virtual museum celebration

    Engaged guest experience

  • Community engagement teams

    Neighborhood group virtual outing

    Shared interactive moments

Show 1 more scenario
  • Corporate social committees

    Culture-focused team party

    Higher on-camera participation

    Interactive audience moments maintain pace and participation during the hosted session.

Best for: Fits when organizers want a hosted entertainment experience with guided participation and tight pacing control.

#7

Eventective Virtual Events

other

Event services marketplace that connects buyers with providers for online parties and virtual event entertainment.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Production cue sheet driven virtual venue hosting that coordinates host timing, moderation, and segment transitions in one event run.

Eventective Virtual Events supports hosted virtual parties with agenda-driven production and a venue-style event experience for remote guests. The service focuses on end-to-end event operations, including cueing for hosts and moderation workflows that keep live sessions on schedule.

Pros
  • +Run-of-show cueing reduces live production drift during multi-segment parties
  • +Moderated chat and Q&A handling fit events that need controlled audience participation
  • +Backstage production workflows support host transitions and on-air timing
  • +Post-event replay delivery supports guest catch-up after the live session
Cons
  • –Event moderation depends on assigned production support instead of full self-serve controls
  • –Advanced engagement mechanics are limited compared with tools built for interactive games
Use scenarios
  • Wedding planning teams

    Remote guest reception session

    On-schedule guest experience

  • Public sector coordinators

    Virtual community appreciation event

    Accessible replay availability

Show 1 more scenario
  • Education program staff

    Recognition event with captioned viewing

    Improved accessibility

    Captioning-supported viewing assets help participants revisit the program with accessibility needs.

Best for: Fits when event planners need guided virtual production for parties with scheduled segments and moderated guest interaction.

#8

Yaymaker

specialist

Live virtual paint and sip parties hosted by professional art instructors.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Guided activity run-of-show that standardizes host cues across live virtual party formats.

Yaymaker fits event planners who need a pre-built virtual party production workflow with structured activities and an emcee-style guide. It supports live-streamed sessions with host moderation, interactive prompts, and attendee engagement through built-in activity flows.

Pros
  • +Pre-sequenced party formats reduce run-of-show building time
  • +Host moderation tools align with emcee-style facilitation
  • +Interactive activity prompts keep engagement structured during the event
  • +Guided production flow helps teams avoid missing segment handoffs
Cons
  • –Limited flexibility for custom interactive mechanics beyond preset flows
  • –Integration depth is restricted when organizers need enterprise onboarding controls
Use scenarios
  • Event planners

    Live virtual party with guided activities

    Consistent participant engagement

  • Sales enablement teams

    Client appreciation live event

    Better client involvement

Show 1 more scenario
  • Brand managers

    Coordinated virtual campaign celebration

    Smooth segment transitions

    Built-in sequencing supports scripted segment cues for a repeatable branded experience.

Best for: Fits when organizers want guided virtual party production with consistent segment pacing and host-led moderation.

#9

Unexpected Virtual Tours

specialist

Hosted online event provider that delivers virtual parties, celebrations, and interactive cultural experiences.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Live emcee facilitation tailored to guided tour storytelling with moderated participation during the stream.

Unexpected Virtual Tours targets event planners who need a virtual tour experience with emcee-led party flow and attendee interaction. The service typically bundles live-streamed tour hosting with moderated participation, including chat management during the event.

Pros
  • +Emcee facilitation keeps the tour narrative aligned with party segments
  • +Moderated chat reduces off-topic noise during live viewing
  • +Run of show cue planning supports consistent pacing across segments
  • +Replay-oriented delivery makes post-event sharing straightforward
Cons
  • –Limited evidence of self-serve configuration for advanced interaction patterns
  • –Works best with operator-led sessions rather than fully DIY production
  • –Registration-page integration options are not clearly documented
  • –Analytics depth for engagement metrics appears limited compared to specialist stacks
Use scenarios
  • Travel and tourism teams

    Brand tour for remote audiences

    Higher audience interaction

  • Association event leads

    Member meetup with interactive tour

    Cohesive group experience

Show 1 more scenario
  • Corporate outreach coordinators

    Client entertainment tour night

    Rewatchable event content

    Replay delivery ensures attendees can revisit the tour content after missing live parts.

Best for: Fits when a planner wants an operator-led virtual party built around a guided tour flow.

#10

Escapely

specialist

Interactive event company that offers hosted online parties, virtual escape rooms, and celebration formats for teams.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Host-facilitated mystery gameplay with synchronized participant roles that drives the entire event flow.

Escapely delivers live, host-led virtual party experiences centered on interactive mystery games that run through a guided video call. The service emphasizes scripted emcee facilitation, role-based participant materials, and a structured run of show that keeps groups moving together.

Pros
  • +Host-led mystery gameplay reduces planning burden during the session
  • +Clear run of show keeps large groups engaged without constant moderator input
  • +Role-specific participation materials support group dynamics and pacing
  • +Post-event recording delivery provides value for attendees who missed live moments
Cons
  • –Interactivity depends on participant attention during scripted cues
  • –Limited self-serve production controls compared with fully DIY virtual venue setups
  • –Audio and camera quality can affect group comprehension in live facilitation
  • –Requires coordination of arrival timing to keep gameplay synchronized
Use scenarios
  • Event organizers

    Remote mystery game team party

    Coordinated group progress

  • Customer community managers

    Interactive customer night event

    Fewer live issues

Show 2 more scenarios
  • HR coordinators

    Virtual celebration with structured roles

    Higher engagement during play

    A run-of-show mystery format provides shared focus and role clarity for dispersed employees.

  • Nonprofit outreach teams

    Fundraising mystery party with replay

    Replay for late attendees

    Post-event replay delivery supports viewers who could not attend every game segment live.

Best for: Fits when groups want a guided, interactive party format with minimal production management.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 virtual party, Hooray Teams stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Hooray Teams

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Party

How should event planners choose between a quiz-centric flow and game-driven pacing?
Quiz Coconut fits parties where the core activity is round-based trivia with facilitator-led scoring and a standardized question flow. Go Game fits parties where timed, host-led activities drive pacing across multiple moments, not just a single quiz mechanic.
Which service providers handle staffed emcee facilitation with cue-based run-of-show control?
Hooray Teams provides staffed emcee facilitation plus backstage coordination tied to a prebuilt run of show. Confetti and TeamBuilding also run emcee-led segments with cue coordination, and Eventective Virtual Events drives cueing across hosts and moderation workflows.
How does onboarding work for live attendees during a virtual party session?
Quiz Coconut includes participant onboarding for live sessions and keeps onboarding aligned with moderated question delivery. Escapely uses role-based participant materials so attendees can join the correct mystery game flow without manual setup by the organizer.
When an event requires interactive audience moderation, which providers support that workflow?
Confetti uses run-of-show cue coordination to coordinate interactive games and moderated chat timing. Eventective Virtual Events runs venue-style hosting with cueing for hosts and moderation workflows that keep guests on schedule during scheduled segments.
What breaks if a team expects DIY webinar tooling instead of production-led virtual party operations?
Yaymaker is designed for guided activity run-of-show sequencing, and it is less suited to teams that require deep custom integrations or full control over onboarding and streaming mechanics. Hooray Teams and Eventective Virtual Events emphasize operational run-of-show execution, so DIY expecting a self-serve webinar layer will find less control over the end-to-end production workflow.
Which providers deliver replay-ready or post-event viewing assets for attendees who miss segments?
Quiz Coconut focuses on replay-ready deliverables after the event. Confetti and Escapely both center on replay delivery after the live session, and Eventective Virtual Events includes post-event viewing assets with captioning support.
How should planners handle technical rehearsal and production cue sheets for live timing?
TeamBuilding centers delivery on production cue sheets and emcee timing across interactive games. Hooray Teams supports operator workflows for hosting, cueing, and rehearsing so the run of show executes without last-minute gaps.
Where does guided storytelling fit better than generic entertainment segments?
Unexpected Virtual Tours is built around live-streamed tour hosting with a narrative synchronized to party segments and moderated participation. Museum Hack uses facilitator-led scripts with real-time audience prompts and pacing control, which fits parties where the storyline drives engagement.
Which service is the best fit when the party must stay synchronized around a single guided format, like a tour or mystery?
Unexpected Virtual Tours keeps the narrative synchronized by pairing tour storytelling with run-of-show cue planning and chat management during the stream. Escapely keeps the group moving together through scripted emcee facilitation and synchronized participant roles that power the mystery game flow.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Virtual Party

We focus on what separates options for a virtual party: whether you can reliably run the program and manage changes live. The biggest differentiator is usually Event production control, followed by Moderation tools and Engagement mechanics.

Event production control

Why it matters

Event production control matters because a virtual party often shifts in real time, and you need the show to keep pace without breaking the flow. When control is granular, you can correct timing mid-event rather than waiting for a restart.

How to check

Ask the host to switch between agenda items during a demo and watch what changes instantly. Then test whether you can pause, resume, or reorder segments without losing chat, queues, or stage state.

Moderation tools and chat governance

Why it matters

Moderation tools and chat governance reduce disruption during a virtual party and keep participation on track. Strong governance helps you handle spam, off-topic messages, and staged participation without derailing the host.

How to check

On a demo, look for message filtering and role-based controls, then ask the presenter to try blocking or restricting a participant. Also check whether you can toggle chat modes during key moments like introductions and activities.

Audience engagement mechanics

Why it matters

Audience engagement mechanics decide whether your virtual party feels participatory rather than passive. If engagement is limited or hard to time, participation drops and your plan becomes harder to execute.

How to check

During a demo, run one activity that requires audience input and confirm you can trigger it at the right moment. Ask what happens when someone joins late or a participant disconnects briefly.

On-demand and scheduled content handling

Why it matters

On-demand and scheduled content handling matters because a virtual party usually mixes pre-made media with live moments. Good handling prevents broken playback, wrong captions, or sync drift when you swap segments.

How to check

Have the host load one pre-recorded segment and one scheduled segment, then start both from the control area. Ask what formats are accepted and whether the system shows playback status to the host.

Participant access and role management

Why it matters

Participant access and role management supports your workflow during a virtual party, especially when multiple organizers share duties. Clear roles help prevent accidental control takeovers and make delegation practical.

How to check

Request a walkthrough of how you assign roles (for example, organizer vs. speaker vs. participant) and what each role can do during the event. Then test adding someone mid-event and verify their permissions.

Event activity reporting and export

Why it matters

Event activity reporting and export helps you review what worked after a virtual party and plan the next one. When reporting is detailed and exportable, your team can adjust programming without guessing.

How to check

Ask for a sample report from a past event and confirm it includes the actions and participation you care about. Then check whether the export includes timestamps and can be downloaded in common formats.

Red flags

  • Controls lag or reset show state during segment swaps
  • Chat moderation lacks clear role-based limits
  • Engagement activities fail for late joiners

Fit by situation

  • If you run live segments with frequent timing changes, prioritize Event production control.
  • If you expect lots of chat participation or sensitive topics, prioritize Moderation tools and chat governance.
  • If you need participation to feel active, prioritize Audience engagement mechanics.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.