Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Pre Press Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Art Design

Top 10 Best Pre Press Services of 2026

Editorial roundup comparing pre press services and fit for print teams, with tradeoffs to weigh and provider options like Zephyr Communications.

20 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Pre press services turn submitted artwork and layout files into press-ready output by running preflight, enforcing color and trapping rules, planning imposition, and producing export packages print teams can run on schedule. This comparison helps analysts and operators weigh workflow fit and file handling depth, including how providers manage proofs, packaging dielines, and handoff formats from Zephyr Communications through other production-focused options.

Zephyr Communications is the best pick for teams that need automated pre-press integration with auditability and role-based governance because its RBAC and event audit trail tie every job change to configuration and processing history, while Informatics Prepress and Print Consulting is the stronger alternative for production groups that want governed workflow configuration with controlled provisioning steps and repeatable outputs.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Zephyr Communications

RBAC plus audit log for pre-press job events tied to configuration and processing history.

Best for: Fits when teams need automated pre-press integration with auditability and role-based governance.

2

Informatics Prepress and Print Consulting

Editor pick

Governed workflow configuration that ties prepress stages to consistent schemas and controlled provisioning steps.

Best for: Fits when production teams need governed prepress integrations with clear configuration and controlled changes.

3

Informa Print & Packaging Services

Editor pick

Packaging-ready imposition and press-ready file preparation from preflight through output.

Best for: Fits when packaging-heavy jobs need controlled pre press execution and fewer proof cycles.

Comparison Table

1
agency
9.4/10
Overall
2
8.9/10
Overall
3
8.8/10
Overall
4
8.3/10
Overall
5
8.1/10
Overall
6
7.8/10
Overall
7
7.5/10
Overall
8
7.2/10
Overall
9
6.8/10
Overall
10
agency
6.6/10
Overall
#1

Zephyr Communications

agency

Offers prepress and production services for editorial and marketing art design, including PDF preflight, imposition support, and print-ready handoff.

9.4/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.5/10
Value9.3/10
Standout feature

RBAC plus audit log for pre-press job events tied to configuration and processing history.

Zephyr Communications supports pre-press delivery by converting inbound design assets into print-ready outputs while preserving a structured data model for layout, color, and job metadata. Integration depth shows up through API and automation hooks that enable schema mapping and job provisioning from upstream systems without manual handoffs. Governance controls cover RBAC for role separation and an audit log that records configuration and processing events tied to each job.

A key tradeoff is the need to align upstream metadata to Zephyr Communications data model and schemas before automation can run end-to-end. Teams see best fit when production volume requires repeatable throughput, such as campaign batches where art, versions, and vendor routing must stay traceable across many revisions.

Pros
  • +API-driven automation for job provisioning and orchestration
  • +Structured data model reduces metadata drift across revisions
  • +RBAC and audit log support governance for multi-role teams
  • +Extensibility points for custom schema mapping
Cons
  • –Automation depends on upstream schema alignment for best results
  • –More configuration work than ad hoc, low-volume print runs
Use scenarios
  • Prepress operations teams

    Automate batch jobs across multiple vendors

    Higher throughput with fewer errors

  • Workflow integration engineers

    Connect DAM and job systems via API

    Consistent outputs per revision

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Brand governance teams

    Enforce approvals and traceable processing

    Clear accountability on revisions

    RBAC and audit log track who changed configuration and which processing steps ran per job.

  • Creative production managers

    Manage versioned layouts and asset variants

    Reduced reprocessing cycles

    Data model keeps layout metadata and processing settings consistent across art updates.

Best for: Fits when teams need automated pre-press integration with auditability and role-based governance.

#2

Informatics Prepress and Print Consulting

specialist

Provides production-focused prepress services including file preflight, imposition, color management support, and print-ready output workflows for publishing and packaging work.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

Governed workflow configuration that ties prepress stages to consistent schemas and controlled provisioning steps.

Informatics Prepress and Print Consulting delivers prepress and print consulting with a focus on production integration across systems, files, and shop-floor workflows. The distinct strength is governance around configuration changes, including controlled data handling that supports repeatable outputs.

Delivery commonly centers on automation touchpoints such as workflow orchestration, job setup rules, and integration of prepress stages into wider operations. The engagement emphasis supports throughput and auditability by standardizing schemas, provisioning steps, and change management across production runs.

Pros
  • +Production workflow integration across file handling, proofing, and press handoff stages
  • +Configuration governance for repeatable outputs across reorders and rule changes
  • +Practical automation guidance for job setup rules and stage-to-stage orchestration
  • +Structured data model alignment for schemas used across prepress processes
Cons
  • –Automation surface details can be limited without explicit API scope mapping
  • –RBAC and audit log specifics depend on the client environment and tooling
  • –Extensibility options may require custom integration work for niche systems
  • –Sandbox and safe rollout mechanisms are not always documented in engagements
Use scenarios
  • Print operations leaders

    Standardize job setup rules across runs

    Fewer output inconsistencies

  • Workflow engineering teams

    Orchestrate prepress stages across tools

    More predictable handoffs

Show 1 more scenario
  • Production governance owners

    Audit configuration changes and data handling

    Stronger operational auditability

    Implements change management patterns that support traceability for configuration-driven transforms.

Best for: Fits when production teams need governed prepress integrations with clear configuration and controlled changes.

#3

Informa Print & Packaging Services

specialist

Prepress and print production services that handle artwork remediation, proofing cycles, and print-ready export preparation for packaging and commercial printing.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Packaging-ready imposition and press-ready file preparation from preflight through output.

Informa Print & Packaging Services supports pre press deliverables that map to print production needs, including preflight validation, layout corrections, and production-ready output preparation. Integration depth is most visible in how file requirements and packaging constraints carry through toward press handoff. The data model is job-centric, centered on packaging formats, print attributes, and production specs rather than a generic document metadata schema.

Automation and API surface appear geared toward operational throughput through process controls, not toward exposing a programmable schema for external orchestration. A concrete tradeoff is limited extensibility for teams needing deep API automation, because job handling emphasizes internal production workflows. In usage situations where packaging rules and proof cycles must stay consistent across frequent reprints, the service helps maintain configuration discipline and reduces file churn.

Pros
  • +Job-centric pre press workflow aligns with production handoff
  • +Packaging-aware preparation reduces packaging-spec rework
  • +Preflight and correction handling supports consistent press-ready output
Cons
  • –Limited evidence of a public API for schema-driven automation
  • –Extensibility for custom governance workflows appears constrained
Use scenarios
  • Brand ops teams

    Repeat packaging runs with tight tolerances

    Fewer resubmissions and proofs

  • Production coordinators

    Consolidate preflight and press-ready handoff

    Lower downstream rework

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Print service providers

    Standardize job files for multiple presses

    More consistent throughput

    Applies consistent pre press checks to align job specs to press requirements.

  • Packaging design teams

    Handle color and layout constraints

    More press-ready artwork

    Supports color and layout readiness so packaging designs survive production constraints.

Best for: Fits when packaging-heavy jobs need controlled pre press execution and fewer proof cycles.

#4

JDS Industries Print and Prepress

other

Provides prepress services alongside print production, including file preparation, proofing support, and press-ready export for production print jobs.

8.3/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Prepress workflow configuration that enforces file specifications across job assets.

JDS Industries Print and Prepress performs prepress production intake, file preparation checks, and print-ready output routing for commercial print workflows. Integration depth centers on handling client file specifications through configurable prepress processes tied to a consistent data model for jobs, assets, and production steps.

Pros
  • +Prepress intake to print-ready output mapping reduces manual handoffs
  • +Configurable processing steps support consistent file-spec enforcement
  • +Job and asset workflow structure helps maintain traceability through production
  • +Operational focus on throughput for repeat print runs
Cons
  • –Automation surface needs verification for API coverage and job schema completeness
  • –Workflow configuration governance needs clear RBAC and audit log documentation
  • –Extensibility options may be limited to supported processing steps
  • –Data model mapping for complex variants may require manual configuration
Use scenarios
  • Commercial print operations

    Route client specs into standard jobs

    Lower rework rates

  • Production automation owners

    Handle status and job intake interfaces

    Fewer intake bottlenecks

Show 1 more scenario
  • IT admins

    Enforce RBAC and audit logs

    Controlled configuration access

    Supports governance by RBAC evaluation and audit log coverage for workflow and configuration edits.

Best for: Fits when print teams need controlled prepress processing with auditable configuration.

#5

Xpedition Studio

specialist

Provides prepress production services for packaging and editorial work, including preflight, imposition planning, and print-ready PDF output.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Workflow state and metadata modeled for API-driven provisioning and controlled execution.

Teams that manage high-volume print preparation can use Xpedition Studio to connect asset intake, imposition, preflight checks, and export to existing systems through API-driven automation. The integration depth is strongest when jobs, metadata, and transformation parameters are already represented as structured objects that can map to a consistent schema and workflow state.

Pros
  • +API-first automation for job orchestration across pre press stages
  • +Schema-driven data model for consistent metadata and transformations
  • +RBAC and audit log support controlled multi-user operations
Cons
  • –Automation requires disciplined input schemas and mapping rules
  • –Best outcomes depend on upfront configuration of transformation parameters
Use scenarios
  • Print operations teams

    Automate intake to export with API jobs

    Fewer manual handoffs

  • Brand and production coordinators

    Standardize approvals and output mapping

    More predictable reprints

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Systems and integration engineers

    Provision pipelines from internal schemas

    Higher integration throughput

    Uses an API surface to connect job parameters and configuration to pre press rules.

  • Managed services operations

    Run multi-client workflows with governance

    Stronger compliance controls

    Applies RBAC and audit logging to maintain traceability across shared environments.

Best for: Fits when print operations need governed automation and deep system integration.

#6

Graphic Whizard Prepress

specialist

Prepress services for art and print workflows that include file corrections, imposition support, and preparation for production output.

7.8/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Configuration-driven preflight and PDF processing workflow for repeatable production-ready outputs.

Graphic Whizard Prepress performs prepress workflows such as PDF handling, print-ready checks, and file preparation for production handoff. It distinguishes itself with an automation-first delivery model where configuration drives repeatable output rather than manual per-job adjustments.

Pros
  • +Job-driven configuration reduces manual rework between prepress and production
  • +Preflight checks align output to print constraints before handoff
  • +Workflow automation improves throughput for repeatable packaging and label work
  • +Extensibility through repeatable transformations supports multiple output targets
Cons
  • –Automation depends on correct schema mapping of job inputs and constraints
  • –API surface depth is limited for complex orchestration without custom work
  • –Governance controls require defined roles and review paths per workflow
  • –Throughput gains drop when asset volumes need manual exception handling
Use scenarios
  • Prepress coordinators

    Run repeatable PDF readiness checks

    More consistent approvals

  • Print production teams

    Enforce asset constraints for exports

    Fewer format surprises

Show 1 more scenario
  • Operations analysts

    Reduce variance between submissions

    Lower downstream remake risk

    Limits manual adjustments by aligning operational handoffs with defined asset and constraint rules.

Best for: Fits when packaging and label teams need controlled prepress automation and consistent output.

#7

Packz Printing

agency

Packaging print production that delivers prepress services such as dieline validation, artwork cleanup, and production-ready file preparation.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Job-centric prepress workflow configuration that standardizes validation and output preparation.

Packz Printing delivers pre press services focused on production readiness for print files and packaging workflows. It emphasizes file intake, validation, and preparation tasks that feed downstream press systems with fewer last-mile corrections.

Pros
  • +Workflow rules applied consistently across recurring packaging job types
  • +Prepress file checks reduce press-side rework from common production gaps
  • +Configuration supports repeatable preparation for predictable throughput
  • +Automation surfaces support batch processing and standardized output handling
Cons
  • –Automation coverage depends on workflow fit for specific packaging formats
  • –API surface details are harder to assess without direct integration discovery
  • –Extensibility may require custom operational mapping for edge-case schemas
Use scenarios
  • Packaging production managers

    Validate files before press handoff

    Reduced press corrections

  • Prepress operations staff

    Prepare validated packaging assets

    Faster production starts

Show 1 more scenario
  • Operations governance teams

    Apply RBAC with traceable activity records

    Clear operational accountability

    Supports audit-friendly activity records tied to role-based access for prepress configuration changes.

Best for: Fits when packaging teams need governed pre press automation with repeatable preparation rules.

#8

Proforma Print Services

agency

Managed print production services that coordinate prepress steps like proofing, file preparation, and output coordination across print runs and formats.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Order-linked pre press coordination for production-ready handoffs across fulfillment steps.

Proforma Print Services fits print operations that need pre press workflows integrated into multi-location fulfillment and quote-to-production handoffs. Its core capabilities center on production-ready file preparation support, print-ready output coordination, and order document processing that connects creative assets to downstream finishing steps.

Pros
  • +Pre-press handling geared to production-ready file preparation workflows.
  • +Order-driven processing supports coordination across print and finishing steps.
  • +Managed handoffs reduce manual translation between departments.
Cons
  • –Public API and schema details are not a clear integration starting point.
  • –Automation extensibility appears constrained compared with API-first services.
  • –Governance controls like RBAC and audit logs are not clearly documented publicly.
Use scenarios
  • Multi-location print operators

    Coordinate print-ready outputs across sites

    Fewer cross-site discrepancies

  • Order management teams

    Connect quotes to production file checks

    Cleaner order-to-make flow

Show 1 more scenario
  • Production planners

    Link creative assets to finishing requirements

    More predictable finishing outcomes

    Ensures creative deliverables match production constraints for downstream finishing execution.

Best for: Fits when teams need managed pre press execution tied to production order routing.

#9

Landa Digital Printing Services

enterprise_vendor

Print production and prepress support for digital printing workflows including file readiness checks, color and imaging preparation guidance, and production handoff.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Production-aligned pre-press file readiness validation for controlled print handoff.

Landa Digital Printing Services is differentiated by its print-ready focus on pre-press workflows tied to Landa production systems. The service supports integration into job preparation and production handoff, using configurable data handling and production-ready output formats.

Pros
  • +Pre-press workflow tuned for Landa production handoff
  • +Color-managed processing supports consistent output across jobs
  • +File readiness checks reduce production rework from malformed assets
  • +Workflow configuration supports controlled output formatting rules
Cons
  • –Automation depth favors managed workflow configuration over open APIs
  • –RBAC, audit log, and governance controls are not presented as programmable primitives
  • –Extensibility relies more on operational processes than schema-driven integrations
  • –Sandbox and automated provisioning paths are not clearly documented for developers
Use scenarios
  • Digital print production teams

    Prepare color-managed files for handoff

    Lower remake frequency

  • Job preparation coordinators

    Convert inputs into print-ready formats

    More reliable job acceptance

Show 1 more scenario
  • Workflow administrators

    Configure controlled workflow execution

    Tighter governance of runs

    Implements workflow configuration and managed controls tied to production operational requirements.

Best for: Fits when teams need managed pre-press execution aligned to Landa production workflows.

#10

Ryonet

agency

Print production support that includes prepress-related checks and file preparation services for production pipelines feeding print vendors.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use6.6/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Job intake configuration with approval-driven handoffs to manage pre press throughput.

Ryonet fits production teams that need pre press services integrated into existing production workflows. Its documented service delivery centers on file preparation, pre press production support, and press-ready output handling tied to job intake and approvals.

Pros
  • +Production-focused pre press handling tied to job intake and deliverable specs
  • +Operational governance supports repeatability across recurring print workflows
  • +Configuration around file types and output requirements reduces rework loops
  • +Clear handoffs for approvals and production status tracking
Cons
  • –API surface and automation depth are not positioned as a general public platform
  • –Data model details for machine-to-machine provisioning are not presented in-page
  • –Extensibility depends on engagement scope rather than self-serve customization
  • –Sandboxing and governance controls like RBAC and audit log are not explicitly documented
Use scenarios
  • Production teams

    Prepare files for existing approval steps

    Fewer approval delays

  • Job intake coordinators

    Standardize press-ready output handling

    More consistent press handoffs

Show 1 more scenario
  • Automation program leads

    Align governance with recurring job types

    Higher repeatable throughput

    Implements operational governance patterns to manage throughput across repeating production categories.

Best for: Fits when print production teams need managed pre press execution with controlled handoffs.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 pre press, Zephyr Communications stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Zephyr Communications

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Pre Press Services

Which pre-press provider has the most explicit API-driven automation surface for job orchestration and schema mapping?
Zephyr Communications is the clearest match because its documented API-driven automation connects provisioning, schema mapping, and job orchestration to studio and vendor systems. Xpedition Studio also centers on a documented API surface, but its workflow state and schema-driven job handling focus more on governed execution than orchestration across external vendor systems.
How do Zephyr Communications and Xpedition Studio handle governance for multi-client or multi-plant operations?
Zephyr Communications pairs RBAC with an audit log that ties pre-press job events to configuration and processing history. Xpedition Studio also uses RBAC and audit logging, with workflow state and metadata modeled to control operations across clients or plants.
Which provider is best for packaging-heavy jobs that need press-ready imposition from preflight through output?
Informa Print & Packaging Services is built for packaging pre-press work because it includes preflight plus imposition support and color handling that ends in packaging-ready layouts for press-ready output. Packz Printing focuses on production readiness and validation for packaging workflows, but its emphasis stays closer to repeatable preparation rules and fewer proof cycles.
For a print operation that needs controlled pre-press configuration changes across runs, which option fits best?
Informatics Prepress and Print Consulting is designed around governed configuration changes and repeatable outputs, with standardizing schemas and provisioning steps for change management. Graphic Whizard Prepress also uses configuration-driven preflight and PDF processing, but its strongest emphasis is repeatable exports from a defined data model of assets, constraints, and output targets.
Which providers support auditable, configurable intake of client file specifications for commercial print workflows?
JDS Industries Print and Prepress fits when client file specifications must be enforced through configurable pre-press processes tied to a consistent data model for jobs and assets. Zephyr Communications can also provide auditability through RBAC plus an audit log, but JDS places more weight on prepress workflow configuration that enforces file specifications for output routing.
What delivery model differs most between Proforma Print Services and developer-first pre-press services?
Proforma Print Services emphasizes managed execution around file checks and order-linked pre-press coordination for production-ready handoffs, and its public API and schema details are not treated as a primary interface. Zephyr Communications and Xpedition Studio foreground an API-driven, schema-driven automation model that exposes integration surfaces for provisioning and workflow handling.
Which provider aligns best with a specific production system for file readiness validation and color-managed processing?
Landa Digital Printing Services aligns tightly with Landa production systems by delivering production-aligned pre-press file readiness validation and color-managed processing. Ryonet supports job intake and approvals for pre-press handoffs, but it does not position its workflow as tied to a single production ecosystem in the same way.
Which option is strongest for repeatable PDF handling and preflight that reduces variation between submissions and exports?
Graphic Whizard Prepress is strongest for configuration-driven preflight and PDF processing because its defined data model targets assets, constraints, and output targets for controlled transformations. Xpedition Studio also models workflow state and transformation rules, but Graphic Whizard centers on PDF handling and export consistency for packaging and label teams.
How do teams typically onboard and move existing job data into a controlled pre-press workflow without losing traceability?
Zephyr Communications fits migrations where job metadata and processing history must preserve traceability because its controlled data models, repeatable configuration, RBAC, and audit log cover pre-press job events. Xpedition Studio is also migration-friendly for governed execution because workflow state and metadata are modeled for schema-driven provisioning, but teams should plan mapping into that workflow state model.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Pre Press

We separate pre press options by how they handle the handoff from design to press: especially PDF/X compliance, color handling, and workflow control. The best choice for a trial usually shows clear behavior on the first real file you import and validate.

PDF/X compliance options

Why it matters

PDF/X compliance options determine whether the tool enforces a predictable container for pre press deliverables. That affects downstream failures when you swap vendors or automate submissions.

How to check

Open a sample job that is known to fail in other tools and import it to see if you get a targeted validation report. Confirm what compliance modes it supports and whether it can export an approved PDF/X variant for press.

Color management and proofing support

Why it matters

Color management and proofing support matters because press teams need consistent output when converting CMYK or managing spot behavior. It also reduces surprises when monitors differ from the proof workflow.

How to check

Run the same job through the tool twice with the same settings, then check what it does with ICC profiles and spot colors. Ask the demo to show how it produces a proof and how closely it matches a reference hard proof from your current process.

Trapping and overprint controls

Why it matters

Trapping and overprint controls affect edge artifacts and ink interaction, especially for dense text and mixed fills. Better controls make it easier to keep established print standards across jobs.

How to check

Load artwork that includes overprints and tight vector details, then compare output with trapping enabled vs disabled. Check whether you can set overprint behavior explicitly and review the produced previews or reports.

Imposition and signature layout tools

Why it matters

Imposition and signature layout tools affect pagination, scaling, and final sheet layout accuracy. When you change formats often, control here prevents costly imposition rework.

How to check

Use a template job with multiple pages and imposition requirements, then confirm you can create or adjust signature layout without breaking page content. Verify output imposition guides and that trim/bleed handling stays consistent in the preview.

Automation and API for batch jobs

Why it matters

Automation and API for batch jobs matters when pre press volume is high or handoffs are time-sensitive. It also lets you standardize checks and exports so teams do the same thing every time.

How to check

In the demo, ask for an example batch run that validates and exports files from a folder or queue. Check whether it exposes an API or scripting hooks for job parameters and reports, and whether you can reuse configurations safely.

Red flags

  • Validation reports that are vague or hard to act on.
  • Color output changes between runs with identical settings.
  • Imposition previews that don’t match final exported layouts.

Fit by situation

  • If you switch between print shops, prioritize PDF/X compliance options.
  • If your jobs rely on spot and profile-driven color, prioritize Color management and proofing support.
  • If you handle many page layouts and signatures, prioritize Imposition and signature layout tools.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.