GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Market ResearchTop 10 Best Mystery Shopping Services of 2026
Top 10 mystery shopping services ranked by process, reporting, and sample quality for retail brands, with notes on NielsenIQ, Kantar, Acuras.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Intouch Insight fits when a retail brand needs repeatable mystery shopping fieldwork and scoring across many locations, whereas Market Force is the better alternative if you want controlled evidence collection with consistent reporting that scales across a distributed team.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Intouch Insight
Quality assurance review workflow that cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment.
Built for fits when a retail brand needs repeatable field execution and scoring across many locations..
Secret Shopper
Editor pickRubric-linked narrative comments tie shopper observations to scoring, improving auditability for customer experience audits.
Built for fits when retail CX teams need consistently scored shops across many locations with managed fieldwork..
BestMark
Editor pickManaged assignment execution with evidence capture expectations that tie shopper comments to scoring outcomes.
Built for fits when retail brands need consistent field execution and report structure across many locations..
Comparison Table
Intouch Insight
specialistCanadian CX measurement company delivering mystery shopping, mobile surveys, and operational audits.
Quality assurance review workflow that cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment.
Intouch Insight is positioned for brands that need controlled field operations rather than ad hoc shopper sourcing. Shopper recruitment and shopper screening are handled as part of the managed program, which reduces the operational burden on internal teams. Evidence capture workflows support receipt upload and other submission artifacts, which makes it easier to review compliance visit findings and customer experience audit notes.
A practical tradeoff is that integration depth tends to favor program configuration and internal workflows over deep API automation, so teams with custom systems may require additional coordination. Intouch Insight fits when fieldwork volume is high enough to benefit from centralized briefing, consistent scoring rubric application, and repeatable quality assurance review cycles.
- +Managed shopper recruitment and screening reduce internal field ops load
- +Assignment briefing and questionnaire design keep evaluation criteria consistent
- +Evidence capture supports receipt upload and review-ready submissions
- +Field validation and quality assurance review reduce critical fail risk
- –API automation depth is not the primary focus for custom integrations
- –Complex multi-market programs require tighter governance from the client team
- –Evidence workflows depend on shopper compliance with submission requirements
- –Web and mobile audit formats may require more tailoring per scenario
Retail field operations teams
Multi-store compliance and service checks
More uniform store ratings
Insights and analytics managers
Benchmarking across regions
Cleaner cross-region comparisons
Show 2 more scenarios
Brand quality assurance leads
Reducing evidence gaps in fieldwork
Fewer incomplete submissions
Quality assurance review processes flag missing or inconsistent evidence before reporting finalization.
Category program owners
Periodic merchandising and service audits
Higher audit comparability
Shop questionnaire workflows standardize scenario design and scoring rubric application across cycles.
Best for: Fits when a retail brand needs repeatable field execution and scoring across many locations.
Secret Shopper
specialistOne of the longest-operating mystery shopping providers in the United States, serving retail and restaurant brands.
Rubric-linked narrative comments tie shopper observations to scoring, improving auditability for customer experience audits.
Secret Shopper is well suited to teams that need repeatable mystery shopping execution with a clear chain from shop questionnaire setup through shopper validation and fieldwork management to published mystery shopping report outputs. The program workflow is geared toward retail use cases like staff interactions and service quality checks across in-store and remote formats.
A tradeoff is that the outcome depends on how tightly the client defines the scenario design and evaluation criteria, because the service cannot compensate for vague standards. It works best when the organization needs consistent compliance visit style visits across many stores and wants the same scoring rubric to apply from one wave to the next.
- +Managed execution that keeps shop instructions consistent across waves
- +Reporting format supports rubric-based scoring and comparable narratives
- +Evidence capture guidance improves usefulness of receipts and media
- +Fieldwork workflow fits retail CX audits with repeatable scenarios
- –Best results require tight scenario design and evaluation criteria upfront
- –Less suited to programs needing highly customized automation or self-serve tooling
- –Iteration cycles can slow if briefing changes after recruitment starts
- –Reporting depth may feel limited for teams requiring bespoke data exports
Retail operations leaders
Multi-store service quality benchmarking
Standardized performance baselines
Brand compliance teams
Staff behavior and process checks
Comparable adherence scoring
Show 1 more scenario
Customer experience analysts
Quarterly channel experience audits
Actionable CX trends
Turns narrative comments into rubric-aligned results that can be used for benchmarking analysis.
Best for: Fits when retail CX teams need consistently scored shops across many locations with managed fieldwork.
BestMark
specialistOne of the largest and longest-operating mystery shopping service providers in North America, founded in 1976.
Managed assignment execution with evidence capture expectations that tie shopper comments to scoring outcomes.
BestMark fits teams that need coordinated fieldwork management from shopper onboarding through assignment briefing and completion evidence, because the workflow is designed around executed visits rather than just template creation. The process emphasizes shopper validation through screening steps before field deployment, and it standardizes evaluation criteria through structured questionnaires and scoring rubrics. Evidence requirements such as photos and document uploads help support narrative comments and scoring traceability inside the final mystery shopping report.
A tradeoff appears in the way complex scenario design changes can slow turnaround when approvals and evidence expectations need to be aligned across the program. BestMark works best when the program has stable evaluation criteria and enough lead time for briefing refinement, such as recurring in-store experience audits or periodic telephone mystery shop validation.
- +Fieldwork is run as a managed program, not a manual shopper marketplace.
- +Assignment briefing structure reduces evaluator variability across locations.
- +Evidence capture requirements improve traceability inside the final report.
- +Scoring outcomes connect to shopper narrative comments for auditability.
- –Scenario redesigns can require coordination across briefing approvals.
- –Automations and API surface are not described in public materials.
Retail operations leaders
Monthly in-store experience audits
Clear CX benchmarking by location
Customer experience analytics teams
Quarterly evaluation criteria refresh
Lower scoring variance across shops
Show 1 more scenario
Brand compliance managers
Covert observation for policy adherence
Documented compliance findings
Evidence capture expectations support review of critical fail conditions in reports.
Best for: Fits when retail brands need consistent field execution and report structure across many locations.
Bare International
specialistGlobal mystery shopping and brand audit firm operating across more than 150 countries.
Case-level briefing to questionnaire execution that keeps scoring and evidence expectations aligned for every visit.
Bare International is a mystery shopping program provider with a field operations focus that supports retail customer experience audits across multiple engagement formats. It is structured around assignment brief creation, shopper recruitment and screening, and controlled fieldwork execution with evidence capture workflows.
Reporting centers on shop results that translate into actionable narrative comments and consistent scoring outputs for benchmarking comparisons. The operational differentiator is how case-level instructions flow from brief to questionnaire and into the final evaluation package.
- +Assignment briefs map cleanly to shop questionnaires and evaluation criteria
- +Fieldwork execution emphasizes evidence capture for consistent reporting packages
- +Operational workflow fits retail compliance and customer experience audit programs
- +Report outputs support benchmarking-ready comparisons across locations
- –Automation depth for high-throughput cases appears less documented than leaders
- –Governance controls for multi-brand teams may require disciplined process design
- –Scenario design customization can feel constrained for atypical channel formats
Best for: Fits when retail brands need consistent customer experience audits with controlled brief-to-report execution.
Market Force
enterprise_vendorCustomer experience intelligence provider offering mystery shopping alongside location audits and surveys.
Centralized shop deliverable handling that ties shopper evidence, scoring rubric results, and narrative comments into one review package.
Market Force runs mystery shopping program fieldwork from shopper recruitment through assignment briefing, execution, and final shop deliverables. The company is geared toward retail customer experience audits that rely on consistent evidence capture and standardized evaluation criteria.
Programs are managed through operational workflows for assigning shops, handling shopper compliance, and consolidating narrative comments and scored outputs for benchmarking analysis. Market Force also supports integrations and automation requests for teams that need controlled data flows into reporting systems.
- +Evidence capture workflows fit retail audits with consistent photo and receipt handling
- +Standardized shop questionnaires and scoring rubrics support cross-store comparisons
- +Fieldwork management reduces assignment churn through controlled briefing cycles
- +Reporting outputs support benchmarking analysis and narrative comment review
- –Onboarding requires scenario design and evaluation criteria alignment before scale
- –Automation and API support depend on the specific integration path used
- –Higher-touch programs can increase operational coordination overhead for stakeholders
- –Complex multi-channel scenarios need tighter scenario design to avoid reviewer drift
Best for: Fits when retail brands need repeatable mystery shopping reporting with controlled evidence collection.
TrendSource
specialistField management and mystery shopping provider serving retail, dining, and healthcare sectors.
Evidence requirements are enforced within assignment execution steps, tying shopper submissions to evaluation criteria and follow-up review.
TrendSource supports end-to-end mystery shopping program operations from shopper recruitment and screening through assignment briefing and final mystery shopping report delivery.
Assignment packages include structured shop questionnaires and scenario constraints that drive shopper behavior during covert or in-store observation.
Operational quality assurance review and scoring rubric alignment focus on repeatability for compliance visit and customer experience audit style programs.
- +Program workflows align assignment briefing, questionnaire collection, and final reporting stages
- +Shopper profile matching reduces manual routing for recurring retail formats
- +Field evidence expectations are handled as part of each assignment package
- +Operational review cycles support consistent scoring rubric adherence
- –Governance controls for large shopper panels require more process discipline
- –Evidence capture formats can limit flexibility for highly custom compliance needs
- –API and automation depth is less transparent than some rank leaders
- –Scenario design iteration depends on staff involvement for tighter turnaround
Best for: Fits when retail brands need repeatable mystery shopping workflows across regions with measured compliance evidence.
Coyle Hospitality Group
specialistHospitality-focused mystery shopping firm evaluating luxury hotels, restaurants, and spas.
Hospitality-focused scenario templates that measure service recovery behaviors and observable operational steps.
Coyle Hospitality Group delivers mystery shopping programs focused on hospitality operations where staff behavior and service recovery are the measurement targets. Fieldwork coordination is geared toward managing ongoing visits across locations and ensuring consistent scenario execution.
Reporting emphasizes structured evaluator inputs and narrative evidence so brands can translate shop results into operational changes. Shopper recruitment and screening are treated as part of program delivery, not a separate vendor step.
- +Hospitality-first shop design targets service steps and staff behaviors across visits
- +Fieldwork coordination supports consistent scenario execution across multiple locations
- +Structured evaluator inputs help standardize scoring and narrative comments
- +Evidence capture workflows fit receipt, photo, and observation collection needs
- –Limited transparency into automated data integration and API availability
- –Automation and governance features appear less mature than higher-ranked programs
- –Configuration flexibility for complex evaluation schemas is harder to validate
- –Reporting depth depends on scenario design choices and evaluator alignment
Best for: Fits when hospitality brands need managed mystery shopping visits and consistent evaluator outputs across locations.
Measure Consumer Perspectives
specialistMystery shopping and customer experience firm serving retail, healthcare, and automotive sectors.
Retail-ready shop questionnaires paired with scoring rubric outputs that keep narrative comments and results comparable across sites.
Measure Consumer Perspectives delivers mystery shopping and customer experience audit fieldwork built around recruited shopper profiles, scripted visit workflows, and structured shop questionnaires. Reporting centers on completed shop narratives plus scored evaluation criteria tied to scenario design, which supports retail benchmarks across locations. The service fit is strongest for retailers that need consistent briefing packets, standardized evidence capture, and consolidated shop report outputs for ongoing CX monitoring.
- +Standardized assignment briefing that keeps scenario design consistent across stores
- +Shop questionnaire outputs map cleanly to evaluation criteria and scoring rubrics
- +Evidence capture workflow supports receipt upload and other visit proof needs
- +Consolidated mystery shopping reports help compare performance by location
- –Automation and API surface for integration is not emphasized for self-serve workflows
- –Throughput depends on field capacity and scheduling cycles for higher-volume programs
- –Fieldwork management detail is less visible than buyer teams expect for governance
- –Some advanced evidence formats require tighter coordination during onboarding
Best for: Fits when retail brands need consistent CX audits and scored mystery shop reports across many locations.
Second To None
specialistMystery shopping and customer experience measurement firm serving retail, healthcare, and financial services.
Narrative comment capture is integrated into the evaluation workflow to tie evidence directly to scoring outcomes.
Second To None runs mystery shopping program fieldwork by recruiting and managing shoppers, assigning visits, and collecting evidence tied to scenario design. The service focuses on structured shop questionnaire workflows, including briefing inputs, evaluation criteria, and narrative comment capture for customer experience audits.
Field operations are organized around assignment briefing and evidence collection steps that reduce missing data in reports. Delivery is geared toward retail and multi-location benchmarking needs where consistent scoring rubrics and actionable narrative comments matter.
- +Structured shop questionnaires and scoring rubrics for consistent results
- +Evidence capture workflow supports clear customer experience audit narratives
- +Shopper recruitment and screening process reduces assignment variance
- +Assignment briefing structure helps keep fieldwork aligned to evaluation criteria
- –Lower integration depth for teams expecting direct API and automated provisioning
- –Governance controls can feel thin for multi-team approvals and audit log needs
- –Evidence workflows depend heavily on briefing quality to avoid incomplete uploads
- –Reporting flexibility can be constrained when brands need custom scoring logic
Best for: Fits when brands need managed mystery shopping fieldwork with consistent questionnaires and narrative scoring.
Sinclair Customer Metrics
specialistCustomer experience measurement firm offering mystery shopping, call monitoring, and survey services.
Evidence capture workflow tied to execution and shopper deliverables, keeping compliance-ready artifacts attached to each visit.
Sinclair Customer Metrics is a mystery shopping service provider focused on retail customer experience audits tied to visit execution and evidence capture. It organizes assignment briefing into shopper instructions and shop questionnaire workflows used by field teams and recruited shoppers.
The delivery model centers on controlled fieldwork management with review and scoring support aimed at consistent mystery shopping report outputs. Its distinct value comes from operational handling of mystery shopping programs rather than only collecting survey responses.
- +Operational fieldwork management supports recurring retail mystery shopping programs
- +Shop questionnaire workflows help standardize shopper responses across assignments
- +Evidence capture handling improves auditability of in-store observation findings
- +Report production focuses on actionable customer experience audit outputs
- –Limited visibility into assignment configuration and rubric tuning controls
- –Fewer integration options than enterprise research ecosystems
- –Automation coverage appears narrower for large shopper panel throughput
- –Turnaround depends on field execution cadence rather than self-serve control
Best for: Fits when retail teams need managed mystery shopping execution and report generation with consistent evidence handling.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 market research, Intouch Insight stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right mystery shopping
Mystery shopping programs need more than shopper recruitment and a scenario brief. This buyer’s guide frames category differences through execution workflows, scoring traceability, and evidence handling across Intouch Insight, Secret Shopper, and the other providers that follow.
The coverage includes NielsenIQ, Kantar, and Acuras notes alongside ten dedicated mystery shopping services, with Intouch Insight placed as the top-ranked option for quality assurance review workflow and evidence cross-checking. Secret Shopper and BestMark are also highlighted for how rubric-linked narratives and managed assignment execution shape report consistency across locations.
Mystery shopping programs: evidence capture, scoring traceability, and field execution control
Mystery shopping is a controlled customer experience audit that assigns scenarios to recruited shoppers, collects evidence like photos and receipts, and produces a scored mystery shopping report with narrative comments tied to evaluation criteria. Fieldwork management typically links assignment briefing and shop questionnaires to scoring rubrics and final narrative comments so the deliverable matches the intended evaluation criteria.
Intouch Insight differentiates the workflow by running a quality assurance review that cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment. Secret Shopper emphasizes rubric-linked narrative comments that connect shopper observations to scoring, which improves auditability when retailers need consistent results across many stores.
Execution workflows, scoring traceability, and evidence handling
Mystery shopping buyers need end-to-end field execution control from assignment briefing through shop questionnaire completion to the final mystery shopping report. The differentiator is whether each provider preserves traceability between evaluation criteria, shopper narrative comments, and the evidence package returned for each assignment.
Quality assurance cross-checks between validation signals and submissions
Intouch Insight includes a quality assurance review workflow that cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment. This reduces scoring drift when shoppers follow instructions imperfectly across locations.
Rubric-linked narrative comments for audit-ready scoring
Secret Shopper ties rubric-linked narrative comments to scoring so customer experience audits have consistent justification for each rated item. BestMark also runs managed assignment execution that ties evidence capture expectations to scoring outcomes.
Brief-to-questionnaire alignment that keeps scoring consistent
Bare International uses case-level briefing that maps directly to shop questionnaires and evaluation criteria for each visit. Measure Consumer Perspectives pairs standardized assignment briefing with questionnaire outputs that map to evaluation criteria and scoring rubrics.
Centralized evidence deliverables that combine evidence, rubric results, and narratives
Market Force centralizes shop deliverable handling so shopper evidence, scoring rubric results, and narrative comments land in one review package. TrendSource enforces evidence requirements within assignment execution steps so submissions align to evaluation criteria and follow-up review.
Fieldwork management designed for repeatable retail operations
Intouch Insight, Secret Shopper, and Sinclair Customer Metrics all support managed recurring retail mystery shopping execution with consistent report structures. Second To None integrates narrative comment capture directly into the evaluation workflow to tie evidence to scoring outcomes.
Choose by integration depth and governance discipline for multi-location fieldwork
The right provider depends on how assignment execution, scoring output, and evidence packaging must behave at scale for retail teams. Teams that need measurable control over evidence-to-score traceability should prioritize workflow governance, while teams that need fast internal integration should prioritize automation and API surface coverage.
Match the provider’s evidence-to-score workflow to audit expectations
Pick Intouch Insight when a quality assurance review must cross-check shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment. Pick Market Force when a centralized deliverable package must combine evidence capture, rubric scoring, and narrative comments for review.
Lock scoring justification to the rubric with narrative capture mechanisms
Pick Secret Shopper when rubric-linked narrative comments must tie shopper observations directly to scoring for customer experience audit narratives. Pick Second To None when narrative comment capture must be integrated into the evaluation workflow so scoring stays connected to evidence.
Decide how much scenario redesign effort the team can absorb
Pick BestMark when managed assignment execution is preferred and briefing structure should reduce evaluator variability across locations. Avoid BestMark when scenario redesign coordination across briefing approvals cannot fit the operational timeline.
Confirm the brief-to-questionnaire mapping model for repeatable customer experience audits
Pick Bare International when case-level briefing must map cleanly to shop questionnaires and evaluation criteria so scoring and evidence expectations stay aligned. Pick Measure Consumer Perspectives when standardized assignment briefing must keep scenario design consistent across stores.
Evaluate governance for large panels and high-throughput operations
Pick TrendSource when evidence requirements should be enforced inside assignment execution steps and shopper profile matching must reduce manual routing. Avoid TrendSource when governance controls for large shopper panels must operate with minimal process discipline.
Validate integration needs beyond workflow control
Choose Intouch Insight if the priority is workflow governance and evidence cross-checking rather than heavy customization through API automation depth. Choose providers like Secret Shopper and BestMark only when their public integration and automation expectations match internal systems requirements.
Who should buy mystery shopping services from these providers
Mystery shopping services fit retail brands that need consistent customer experience audits across many locations with evidence capture tied to scoring. The provider selection should reflect how much field execution management and scoring traceability the organization must control rather than just how many shops can be fielded.
Retail CX teams running scored audits across many stores
Secret Shopper and Measure Consumer Perspectives both emphasize consistently scored mystery shops with questionnaire outputs mapped to evaluation rubrics for cross-store comparability.
Retail research and analytics teams that require traceability between validation, evidence, and scoring
Intouch Insight adds a quality assurance review workflow that cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments per assignment.
Retail operations teams coordinating standardized field execution waves
BestMark and Bare International both focus on managed assignment execution and structured brief-to-questionnaire alignment to reduce evaluator variability across locations.
Brands that need evidence deliverables packaged for audit review
Market Force ties evidence capture workflows to standardized shop questionnaires and scoring rubrics so reviewers receive a coherent evidence-and-score package in one place.
Organizations with recurring mystery shopping formats that rely on shopper matching
TrendSource includes shopper profile matching intended to reduce manual routing for recurring retail formats with evidence requirements enforced during assignment execution.
Common mystery shopping buying mistakes that create reporting risk
Buyers often mis-specify the relationship between assignment briefing, shopper evidence capture, and scoring outputs. The result is a report that looks consistent at a glance but fails to connect narrative comments to evaluation criteria in a way reviewers can defend.
Choosing a provider based on evidence capture volume while ignoring evidence-to-score traceability
Intouch Insight and Market Force both tie the evidence workflow to scoring and narrative review so deliverables support scoring justification rather than standalone uploads.
Under-investing in scenario design and evaluation criteria alignment before rolling out multi-market work
Secret Shopper and BestMark both indicate that best results depend on scenario design and evaluation criteria upfront so rubric-linked narrative comments align with scoring.
Assuming governance controls will handle multi-team approvals without disciplined briefing processes
Intouch Insight flags that complex multi-market programs require tighter governance from the client team, while Second To None notes thin governance feel for multi-team approvals and audit log needs.
Expecting deep automation and API coverage without prioritizing the provider workflow model
Intouch Insight is not primarily positioned for custom integrations through API automation depth, and Acuras is mentioned as a category reference point rather than a feature substitute in these provider cards.
Letting evidence formats constrain compliance coverage for specialized retail requirements
TrendSource notes evidence capture formats can limit flexibility for highly custom compliance needs, which can undermine critical fail detection for edge-case visits.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated Intouch Insight, Secret Shopper, BestMark, Bare International, Market Force, TrendSource, Coyle Hospitality Group, Measure Consumer Perspectives, Second To None, and Sinclair Customer Metrics using features as the primary factor, ease/value as the next factor, and overall fit to mystery shopping execution workflows. Features were weighted at 40% based on how each provider ties assignment briefing, shop questionnaires, scoring rubric outputs, and evidence capture into a coherent mystery shopping report with traceable narrative comments.
Ease and value were weighted at 30% each based on the clarity of managed field execution workflows across many locations and the operational effort implied by evidence capture expectations and delivery packaging. Intouch Insight ranked first because its quality assurance review workflow cross-checks shopper validation signals against submitted evidence and narrative comments for each assignment, which directly strengthens scoring traceability end to end.
Frequently Asked Questions About mystery shopping
How do Intouch Insight and TrendSource keep assignment briefing consistent across many locations?
Which service providers support evidence capture workflows that reduce missing data in mystery shopping reports?
When does a quality assurance review catch mismatched shopper validation signals in the field?
What breaks if a mystery shopping program relies only on shopper narratives without rubric-linked scoring?
How do Bare International and Market Force move case instructions from brief to final evaluation package?
How do shopper recruitment and screening workflows affect scenario execution quality in retail audits?
Which providers handle integrations and automation for mystery shopping reporting data flows?
How do admin controls and RBAC-style permissions typically show up in fieldwork management?
Where does shopper onboarding and onboarding artifacts matter most for reducing rework on evaluation packages?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Market ResearchTop 10 Best Market Research Services of 2026
- Market ResearchTop 10 Best Customer Satisfaction Market Research Services of 2026
- International MarketsTop 10 Best Market Research Global Services of 2026
- Market ResearchTop 10 Best Mystery Shopping Software of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Mystery Shopper Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Market Research alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of market research tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare market research tools→