GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital MarketingTop 10 Best Honolulu SEO Services of 2026
Compare Honolulu Seo Services providers for local SEO, with a factual top 10 ranking, criteria, and tradeoffs for businesses in Honolulu.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Straight North
Ongoing local SEO delivery that coordinates technical remediation, content, and authority work.
Built for fits when mid-market teams need managed Honolulu SEO execution with reporting and technical coordination..
Ignite Visibility
Editor pickOngoing SEO reporting tied to technical and on-page action planning.
Built for fits when local teams need managed SEO execution with strong reporting and controlled review cycles..
Victorious
Editor pickCampaign workflow data model that links SEO tasks to measurable performance reporting.
Built for fits when Honolulu teams need structured SEO execution with controlled reporting and repeatable reporting cycles..
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps Honolulu SEO service providers across integration depth, data model alignment, and automation and API surface. It also contrasts admin and governance controls such as RBAC, audit log coverage, and provisioning options so teams can assess how changes flow into reporting, schema, and workflows. Use the dimensions to evaluate extensibility, configuration boundaries, and throughput limits when connecting SEO tooling to existing analytics and content systems.
Straight North
enterprise_vendorProvides technical SEO audits, ongoing SEO management, and content and link acquisition with reporting for local and national search outcomes.
Ongoing local SEO delivery that coordinates technical remediation, content, and authority work.
Straight North handles on-page, technical, and off-page SEO work as an ongoing service delivery process, not just one-time audits. The engagement approach is typically wired into measurement through reporting artifacts and workflow handoffs that connect site changes to visible search signals. This makes it a practical option for teams that want configuration and governance around SEO tasks rather than ad hoc fixes.
The tradeoff is lower direct visibility into its underlying data model and automation surface, since most operational control happens through the service workflow rather than a self-serve API. It fits best for Honolulu teams that need managed execution of technical remediation and content production tied to a defined local targeting scope.
- +Local SEO execution tailored to Honolulu targeting and local intent signals
- +Technical and on-page changes tied to measurable reporting artifacts
- +Campaign workflow supports ongoing optimization rather than static recommendations
- +Delivery typically coordinates content and authority work with technical priorities
- –Limited publicly documented API and automation surface for custom integrations
- –Deeper data model access and schema-level exports are not oriented around developer control
- –Automation throughput depends on service workflow rather than self-serve provisioning
- –Admin governance such as RBAC and audit log access is not clearly exposed
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need managed Honolulu SEO execution with reporting and technical coordination.
More related reading
Ignite Visibility
agencyDelivers SEO strategy, technical SEO, local search optimization, and content support with dashboards and campaign reporting.
Ongoing SEO reporting tied to technical and on-page action planning.
Ignite Visibility is a managed SEO service provider where core work starts with technical and on-page audits, then moves into keyword mapping, content recommendations, and link strategy planning. Delivery is structured around ongoing optimization cycles, with reporting that tracks organic performance and surfaces next actions for both technical and content areas. Teams that already have analytics and measurement in place benefit from clearer handoffs between crawl findings, schema and on-page fixes, and performance reporting expectations.
A concrete tradeoff is that automation and API extensibility are not presented as a primary surface, so deep programmatic provisioning depends on the agency’s workflow fit rather than a first-party developer platform. This matters when internal teams require custom data models, automated ingestion from multiple enterprise sources, or sandbox testing before rollout. A common usage situation is a Honolulu business that wants managed execution plus consistent executive-ready reporting, while keeping internal systems for governance and approvals.
- +Structured audit to ongoing optimization workflow
- +Clear handoff between technical findings and content recommendations
- +Reporting supports internal review and decisioning cadence
- +Execution focus aligns with measurable organic search targets
- +Works well when analytics and measurement are already established
- –Limited emphasis on public API and automation extensibility
- –Custom data model provisioning depends on process fit
- –Schema or technical changes still require human implementation cycles
- –Programmatic governance and sandboxing are not described as first-party capabilities
Best for: Fits when local teams need managed SEO execution with strong reporting and controlled review cycles.
Victorious
agencyRuns SEO and content programs focused on search demand capture with technical fixes, page-level optimization, and link acquisition.
Campaign workflow data model that links SEO tasks to measurable performance reporting.
Victorious is differentiated by how it operationalizes SEO work into an execution loop that connects research inputs to deliverables and then to measurable outcomes. The service design emphasizes a repeatable data model for campaign entities, performance metrics, and task status so that reporting aligns with execution state. Integration depth is strongest when content, technical observations, and rank or conversion metrics can be kept in sync through the same schema.
A key tradeoff is that deep automation depends on how well the local measurement sources map into Victorious reporting objects and fields. Teams get the best fit when they need consistent cross-site reporting and ongoing iteration rather than one-time audits. Usage fits scenarios where multiple stakeholders require controlled access to reporting views and change history, with governance that reduces handoff ambiguity.
- +Consistent campaign data model ties execution status to reporting outputs
- +Automation supports repeatable analysis and reporting refresh cycles
- +Governance supports controlled access across multi-stakeholder SEO operations
- –Automation depth depends on mapping local data sources to Victorious objects
- –API and integration effort can increase when measurement and taxonomy differ
Best for: Fits when Honolulu teams need structured SEO execution with controlled reporting and repeatable reporting cycles.
WebFX
agencyOffers SEO services spanning technical SEO, on-page optimization, local SEO, and performance reporting for multi-location brands.
Managed SEO reporting that links campaign actions to KPI movement over time.
WebFX serves Honolulu SEO needs with implementation depth tied to measurable campaign operations and reporting. The service model supports integration breadth across on-page, technical, and off-page work with recurring execution and performance tracking.
Its governance and automation posture is strongest when stakeholders need documented workflows, repeatable configuration, and clear change history for SEO activities. Teams that prioritize an explicit data model for KPIs, assets, and issues will find the operational control surfaces easier to manage.
- +Campaign execution uses repeatable checklists across technical, on-page, and off-page work
- +Reporting ties SEO activities to measurable KPI changes for stakeholder reviews
- +Works with defined briefs and tracked deliverables for execution consistency
- +Operational cadence supports ongoing improvements instead of one-time tasks
- –API surface details for custom automation are not clearly documented publicly
- –Integration depth depends on coordination around tracking and data sources
- –Automation control granularity may lag teams wanting fine RBAC and provisioning
- –Change governance and audit log behavior is not specified in a technical manner
Best for: Fits when local SEO execution and KPI reporting require managed implementation and tight coordination.
Thrive Internet Marketing Agency
agencyProvides technical and local SEO, keyword and content planning, and conversion-aware optimization with measurable performance tracking.
Keyword and page asset tracking mapped to reporting for iterative on-page and content changes.
Thrive Internet Marketing Agency provides Honolulu SEO services with ongoing optimization and content execution. Delivery centers on an integration-first workflow, using documented process handoffs across keyword research, on-page changes, technical checks, and reporting.
The team typically coordinates SEO outputs through a data model built around page-level assets, query intent, and performance time series. Control depth depends on how changes are governed in the client toolchain, including access control, auditability of edits, and automation hooks into analytics or CMS operations.
- +Page-level optimization workflow tied to measurable query and SERP outcomes
- +Execution handoffs cover technical checks, on-page edits, and content production
- +Reporting cadence supports ongoing iteration rather than one-time deliverables
- +Configuration-driven process fits teams with existing analytics and CMS tooling
- –API and automation surface details are not stated for external system integration
- –RBAC and audit log capabilities depend on client-side tooling choices
- –Extensibility to custom schema needs may require manual operational coordination
- –Sandboxing for SEO change experiments is not described as a formal capability
Best for: Fits when Honolulu teams need managed SEO execution tied to existing analytics and CMS workflows.
Power Digital Marketing
agencyDelivers SEO for enterprise and ecommerce teams including technical SEO, content planning, and link strategy with analytics support.
Schema-aware technical SEO fixes coordinated with redirect and template change governance.
Power Digital Marketing suits Honolulu teams that need SEO execution with integration-first workflows tied to tracking, reporting, and site changes. Delivery centers on schema-aware technical SEO fixes, page-level content optimization, and search visibility reporting tied to defined KPIs.
Integration depth is strongest when the team provides analytics and tag configurations that can be validated against a consistent data model for crawl, index, and conversion signals. Automation and API surface are most useful when tasks can be scheduled around provisioning steps like CMS template edits, redirect rules, and governance checks.
- +Focus on technical SEO schema work tied to measurable crawl and index signals
- +Page-level optimization workflow supports repeatable content and metadata updates
- +Reporting can be mapped to defined KPIs across analytics and search console
- +Governance checks fit environments needing controlled changes and documented QA
- –Automation depth depends on provided instrumentation and consistent tracking definitions
- –API-led extensibility is limited unless internal tooling and endpoints are specified
- –Throughput can lag when approvals delay template or redirect provisioning work
- –Sandboxing for risky changes is only practical if staging access and rollback rules exist
Best for: Fits when Honolulu teams need managed SEO changes coordinated with tracking governance.
HigherVisibility
agencyExecutes technical SEO, on-page improvements, local SEO, and content strategy tied to rankings, traffic, and leads.
Reporting artifacts with stable schema fields that support downstream automation and governance workflows.
HigherVisibility focuses on SEO delivery that can be integrated into an existing marketing analytics data model through repeatable workflows and reporting artifacts. The provider’s work tends to support schema-driven tracking for page, campaign, and landing performance so downstream automation can consume consistent fields.
Integration depth is best evaluated through shared tagging conventions, ingestion of search visibility metrics into reporting systems, and clear change logs that support operational governance. Automation and API surface are not its primary documented differentiator, so extensibility depends on how reliably reports and exports map into the customer’s provisioning and RBAC model.
- +Consistent reporting fields support ingestion into existing analytics data models
- +On-page recommendations map to concrete content and technical change tasks
- +Change tracking and documentation improve auditability for SEO workstreams
- +Workflow handoffs align with marketing operations and campaign management
- +Localization and Honolulu targeting are handled at the content and intent level
- –Public API surface for automation is limited in documented availability
- –Deep RBAC and audit log controls depend on client reporting ownership
- –Automation throughput is constrained by export and manual reporting patterns
- –Integration breadth varies by the customer’s tooling and tagging discipline
Best for: Fits when teams need managed Honolulu SEO execution and standardized reporting exports.
Local SEO Guide
specialistProvides local SEO services focused on Google Business Profile optimization, local citations, and on-page targeting for service areas.
Provisioning workflow for business listing and location-page updates using a structured schema-driven record set.
Local SEO Guide fits Honolulu local SEO service delivery by focusing on integration breadth across local listings and on-page signals. The service emphasizes a clear data model tied to business profile schema, citation records, and on-site location pages, which improves configuration control during rollout.
Automation and API surface are presented through repeatable provisioning workflows for audits and updates, plus structured export formats that can feed downstream tooling. Governance is handled with operational checklists and change tracking expectations, but RBAC, audit log granularity, and sandboxing controls are not positioned as explicit admin features.
- +Business profile schema focus supports consistent local listing updates
- +Repeatable provisioning workflows reduce manual citation update churn
- +Structured exports help integrate with reporting and CMS processes
- +Location-page guidance ties changes to measurable local relevance signals
- –RBAC roles and permission scoping are not described as explicit controls
- –Audit log depth for who changed what is not documented in detail
- –API surface is not described as a first-class automation interface
- –Sandboxing and safe testing environments are not positioned for high-change teams
Best for: Fits when Honolulu teams need managed local listing and on-page alignment with repeatable workflows.
HawkSEM
agencyDelivers technical SEO, local SEO, and content optimization for B2B and consumer brands with ongoing campaign management.
Technical monitoring and structured reporting support ongoing prioritization of site SEO changes.
HawkSEM delivers Honolulu SEO services with implementation work that centers on site and schema changes, on-page optimization, and ongoing technical monitoring. Integration depth is driven by how work is wired into analytics and search console data feeds, then mapped into a repeatable reporting and action data model.
Automation and API surface matter because campaign tasks and reporting updates depend on structured inputs for throughput, consistency, and auditability. Admin and governance controls are evaluated through change control practices for configurations, role separation, and audit log visibility around SEO changes.
- +SEO implementation work focuses on actionable on-page and technical changes
- +Workflows rely on structured reporting inputs for consistent campaign tracking
- +Technical monitoring supports ongoing issue detection and prioritization
- +Documentation of change steps improves operational handoffs
- –API surface and automation endpoints are not evident from public service materials
- –RBAC scope and audit log coverage for SEO changes are unclear
- –Data model depth for custom schema and multi-domain governance is limited
- –Integration options may require manual configuration for analytics alignment
Best for: Fits when Honolulu teams need managed SEO execution with repeatable reporting inputs.
How to Choose the Right Honolulu Seo Services
This buyer's guide helps Honolulu teams pick an SEO services provider by focusing on integration depth, the underlying data model, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls. Coverage includes Straight North, Ignite Visibility, Victorious, WebFX, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, Power Digital Marketing, HigherVisibility, Local SEO Guide, and HawkSEM.
Each section maps real provider strengths to decision points like how reporting artifacts connect to technical and on-page work and how access control and change tracking show up in day-to-day operations. The goal is to translate SEO delivery into measurable integration breadth and control depth for Honolulu launches and ongoing campaigns.
Honolulu SEO services that translate crawl, listings, and content work into controlled reporting outputs
Honolulu SEO services are managed engagements that run technical SEO, on-page optimization, local search execution, and reporting that ties actions to measurable outcomes like organic visibility and local intent signals. Straight North combines technical remediation coordination with content and authority work for Honolulu targets and produces reporting artifacts that stakeholders can track.
Ignite Visibility and HigherVisibility focus on ongoing reporting tied to technical and on-page action planning using repeatable workflows and standardized export fields. Teams typically use these services when analytics, tag management, and search data sources already exist and when internal stakeholders need consistent review and decisioning cycles.
Evaluation criteria for Honolulu SEO providers: integration, automation, governance, and data model fit
Honolulu SEO delivery only scales when reporting artifacts map cleanly into the team’s analytics data model and into the operational steps that implement fixes. Straight North and Victorious connect execution state to reporting outputs through campaign workflows and ongoing local execution.
Automation and API surface matter when internal teams want predictable throughput for refresh cycles and when changes must follow controlled approvals. Ignite Visibility, WebFX, and HigherVisibility emphasize reporting cadence and schema stability, while several providers keep API extensibility and governance controls less explicit.
Reporting artifacts that track action to KPI movement
WebFX links SEO activity to measurable KPI movement over time, which helps governance during stakeholder reviews. Straight North also ties technical and on-page changes to measurable reporting artifacts for Honolulu outcomes.
Campaign workflow data model that ties tasks to performance reporting
Victorious uses a consistent campaign data model that links SEO tasks to measurable performance outputs, which supports repeated analysis and refresh cycles. This reduces ambiguity when multiple stakeholders manage multi-site SEO programs.
Schema-stable exports for downstream automation and analytics ingestion
HigherVisibility emphasizes reporting artifacts with stable schema fields that downstream systems can ingest into existing analytics data models. Ignite Visibility also focuses on structured audit-to-optimization workflows that support decisioning cadence.
Integration-first coordination across technical fixes, on-page changes, and local listings
Straight North coordinates technical remediation with content and authority work for Honolulu targeting, which improves integration breadth across execution lanes. Local SEO Guide provides integration breadth across business profile schema, citation records, and location pages with repeatable provisioning workflows.
Automation and API surface for repeatable refresh cycles
Victorious uses automation to support repeatable analysis and reporting refresh cycles tied to its objects and campaign workflow. Many providers, including Straight North and Ignite Visibility, keep public API and automation extensibility limited, which can shift throughput constraints into manual coordination.
Admin and governance controls such as controlled access and auditability of changes
HawkSEM and Victorious emphasize change control practices and controlled access with auditability focus, which matters for multi-stakeholder SEO operations. Several providers, including Straight North and Local SEO Guide, do not position RBAC and audit log granularity as first-party admin features.
A decision framework for selecting Honolulu SEO services with predictable integration and control
A provider should be evaluated on how its delivery artifacts map into the team’s operational toolchain for reporting, approvals, and implementation. The evaluation should start with integration depth across analytics, search data sources, and the execution steps that change site and listing behavior.
Next, the provider should be tested against automation and governance expectations using concrete questions about data objects, exports, access control, and change history. Straight North, Ignite Visibility, Victorious, WebFX, and HigherVisibility can fit different governance and integration profiles based on how they model SEO work and reporting outputs.
Confirm the reporting data model matches the team’s KPI and schema expectations
Teams that require stable fields for ingestion should prioritize HigherVisibility because it supports reporting artifacts with stable schema fields for downstream automation and governance workflows. Teams that need execution-to-report linkage for task status should evaluate Victorious, which uses a campaign workflow data model that links SEO tasks to measurable performance reporting.
Validate integration depth across Honolulu execution lanes
If the execution plan needs coordination across technical remediation, on-page edits, content, and authority, Straight North is built around ongoing local SEO delivery that coordinates those lanes for Honolulu. If the execution plan depends on Google Business Profile and citation rollout plus location-page guidance, Local SEO Guide uses a business profile schema focus and structured provisioning workflows.
Assess automation throughput and the API surface for repeated reporting refresh cycles
Victorious supports automation that powers repeatable analysis and reporting refresh cycles tied to campaign objects and workflow steps. For teams expecting custom automation endpoints or programmatic provisioning, providers like Straight North, Ignite Visibility, and WebFX keep public API and automation extensibility less explicit, which can require more manual coordination.
Demand explicit answers on admin controls, auditability, and who can approve changes
For governance-heavy environments, HawkSEM and Victorious focus on controlled access and auditability of changes through change control practices for configurations. When RBAC roles and audit log depth are not described as first-party admin controls, as with Straight North and Local SEO Guide, the approval workflow often depends more on client-side tooling alignment.
Align on implementation ownership for technical SEO schema work and redirect or template changes
Power Digital Marketing coordinates schema-aware technical SEO fixes with redirect and template change governance, which fits teams that need controlled changes to crawl and index signals. For multi-location KPI reporting and repeatable execution checklists, WebFX ties campaign actions to measurable KPI movement over time.
Which Honolulu teams should consider each SEO services provider
Different Honolulu teams need different combinations of integration depth, reporting schema stability, and governance controls. The best match depends on whether the internal team prioritizes repeatable workflow data models, schema-stable exports, or local listing and location-page provisioning.
Mid-market teams needing managed Honolulu technical, content, and authority coordination
Straight North fits when internal stakeholders need ongoing local SEO delivery that coordinates technical remediation, content, and authority work with reporting artifacts tied to campaign activity.
Local teams that require repeatable audit-to-optimization reporting and controlled review cycles
Ignite Visibility matches teams that want structured audit workflows and reporting that supports internal decisioning cadence and handoff between technical findings and content recommendations.
Teams that want a campaign workflow data model that ties task state to performance outputs
Victorious fits teams that manage multi-stakeholder SEO operations and need controlled reporting and repeatable refresh cycles driven by a consistent campaign data model.
Multi-location brands prioritizing KPI reporting tied to actions and checklists
WebFX suits Honolulu teams that need managed implementation with repeatable checklists across technical, on-page, and off-page work and that want reporting tied to KPI changes over time.
Teams focused on Google Business Profile, citations, and location-page alignment with repeatable provisioning
Local SEO Guide is a fit when the work depends on business profile schema updates, citation records, and location-page changes using structured provisioning workflows.
Common Honolulu SEO selection pitfalls that break integration, automation, and governance
Several recurring pitfalls show up across the reviewed providers when teams assume the same level of API-driven automation and admin governance. Misalignment usually appears as manual throughput constraints, unclear access control, or exports that do not map cleanly into the team’s operational data model.
These pitfalls are avoidable by requiring concrete workflow and control evidence from providers before selecting a long-running Honolulu engagement.
Selecting without confirming how reporting fields map into the team’s analytics and tagging model
HigherVisibility is a stronger match for teams needing stable schema fields that downstream automation can ingest because its reporting exports emphasize consistent fields. HigherVisibility and Ignite Visibility both focus on structured reporting artifacts, while Straight North and WebFX can require more coordination when teams want schema-level developer control.
Assuming public API and automation extensibility exists for custom workflows
Straight North and Ignite Visibility keep public API and automation extensibility limited in the described service posture, which can push custom integration into manual workflow work. Victorious supports automation for repeatable refresh cycles inside its workflow model, but external API-led extensibility can still require extra integration effort when measurement taxonomy differs.
Ignoring admin governance requirements like RBAC and audit log granularity
When auditability and controlled access are central, HawkSEM and Victorious emphasize change control practices and auditability focus for SEO change steps. Straight North and Local SEO Guide do not position RBAC roles and audit log depth as explicit admin features, which can create gaps for teams that need fine-grained governance.
Choosing a provider that specializes in one lane without alignment on the full Honolulu execution plan
Local listing rollout requires a different integration breadth than technical schema remediation, and Local SEO Guide is built around business profile schema, citations, and location-page updates. Straight North coordinates technical remediation with content and authority work, while Power Digital Marketing coordinates schema-aware technical fixes with redirect and template governance.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated Straight North, Ignite Visibility, Victorious, WebFX, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, Power Digital Marketing, HigherVisibility, Local SEO Guide, and HawkSEM on capabilities, ease of use, and value, with capabilities carrying the most weight because integration depth, data model fit, and operational control show up as concrete execution constraints. The overall ranking uses a weighted average that emphasizes capabilities at 40 percent, then balances ease of use and value at 30 percent each. This editorial research focuses on the provider delivery mechanisms described for reporting, workflow structure, automation behavior, and governance posture, not on hands-on lab testing or private benchmark experiments.
Straight North rose above most lower-ranked providers because it pairs ongoing local SEO delivery with coordination across technical remediation, content, and authority work, then ties those actions to measurable reporting artifacts. That combination lifted capabilities and supported higher usability because stakeholders get campaign-linked reporting outputs aligned to execution priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions About Honolulu Seo Services
Which Honolulu SEO providers expose integrations or APIs for automated reporting and data refresh?
How do the providers handle SSO, RBAC, and auditability for teams managing multiple Honolulu sites?
What onboarding steps reduce risk when migrating SEO content, tags, and reporting baselines?
Which provider workflow is best suited to teams that need strict admin controls and change history for SEO edits?
How do Honolulu SEO providers model data for KPIs, schema, and tracking alignment across tools?
Which provider fits best when Honolulu business listings and location-page signals must stay consistent during updates?
What common technical bottlenecks can cause Honolulu SEO reporting mismatches, and which providers address them structurally?
Which provider is best for teams that want schema-driven technical SEO changes coordinated with CMS or template provisioning?
How should teams choose between Straight North and Ignite Visibility for Honolulu SEO execution with reporting and stakeholder visibility?
Conclusion
After evaluating 9 digital marketing, Straight North stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Marketing alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital marketing tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital marketing tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.